AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthySAPONCT02521805

Enhanced Satiety With Pork Products Containing Dietary Fibre

A study testing Animal protein, Vegetable protein and Dietary fiber (cereal food matrice) in people with Healthy, run by University of Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A randomized cross-over meal study will investigate the effects of protein quality and a combination of dietary fibre and protein on appetite regulation. The study will use basic measures of ad libitum energy intake and visual-analogue scales of appetite (study A). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
What is being tested?
Animal protein, Vegetable protein and Dietary fiber (cereal food matrice)
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
42 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
Aug 2015to Dec 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants who have provided written informed consent
  • Healthy men
  • Ages between 18 and 40 years
  • BMI between 18.5 and 25.0 kg/m2
  • Pork eaters

Who cannot join

  • Any food allergy, dislike or special diet of relevance to the study
  • Daily use of prescription medicine or over-the-counter drugs affecting appetite, energy expenditure or protein metabolism
  • Irregular eating schedule
  • Self-reporting currently dieting or having lost/gained significant amount of weight (±3 kg) in the previous 3 months
  • Any known chronic diseases
  • Vigorous physical activity more than 10 hours/week
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Smoking, smoking cessation within the past 3 months or nicotine use (> 10 cigarettes per day)
  • Substance abuse
  • Alcohol intake above the recommendations from the Danish Health and Medicines Authority
  • Blood donation <3 month before study start and during study period (only relevant for the sub-study)
  • Participants who work in appetite or feeding related areas
  • Participation in other intervention studies
  • Participants not able to comply with the study protocol as judged by study personnel

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • University of Copenhagen

    Frederiksberg, 1958

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

A randomized cross-over meal study will investigate the effects of protein quality and a combination of dietary fibre and protein on appetite regulation.

The study will use basic measures of ad libitum energy intake and visual-analogue scales of appetite (study A). A sub-study (study B) will additionally include blood collection from 15 of the 40 participants to investigate biological markers targeted satiety.

The study days will be conducted at least one week apart to eliminate carry over effects. In the sub-study, the study days will be at least two weeks apart due to blood collection.

Read the detailed description

Dietary proteins have shown to be the most satiating macronutrient, however it is not clear whether various types of protein exert the same effect. The latest evidence on animal versus plant proteins show no differences on appetite and ad libitum energy intake, neither on weight loss but well-designed studies that control for macronutrient composition of protein-rich foods are rare and therefore needed.

Dietary fibre have also shown to play a role in appetite regulation, especially viscous dietary fibre have a greater effect on short-term satiety and subsequent energy intake than less viscous dietary fibers. A combination of dietary fibre and protein would therefore be beneficial in formulation of satiety-enhancing foods targeted consumers who want to maintain or loose weight.

Pork is a good source of high-quality protein and essential vitamins and minerals. The fat content of most retail pork cuts lives up to the Nordic Key Hole nutrition label having less than 10 g fat per 100 gram. Pork can therefore be recognized as a lean meat type delivering key nutrients as part of the diet. Processed pork products such as sausages, liver pate and salamis are nutritionally characterized as high-fat products. However, today the meat industry puts a lot of effort into product development of meat products with a healthier nutritional profile.

The investigators have previously shown that the addition of wheat and rye bran to sausages with 10% fat reduced appetite sensations. Also, the satisfying effect of dietary fibers was more pronounced when added to sausages than when added to bread. These findings point towards a potential for using dietary fibre in meat products in order to improve the nutritional profile of the product as well as the satiating effects.

The overall objective is to investigate the effects of protein quality and a combination of dietary fibre and protein on appetite regulation. Dietary protein and fibre will be combined into an animal protein based food (fiber-meat balls), a vegetable protein based food (veggie "meat balls"), a meal (meat balls with fiber bread) and compared to animal protein per se (meat balls). The study will use measures of ad libitum energy intake and visual-analogue scales of appetite in combination with biological markers targeted satiety.

This study will contribute to a substantial increase in the knowledge on macronutrients and their stimulating effects on appetite-regulating hormones. The study will focus on healthy and palatable pork products containing dietary fibre in order to be applicable to the food industry. The current evidence supports the need for satiating-enhancing foods high in protein and dietary fibre. However, macronutrients and their stimulating effects on appetite-regulating hormones have not been adequately investigated in well-controlled studies using real foods. Likewise, there is no clear evidence that animal protein is superior to vegetable protein with regard to their satiating effects on appetite and appetite-regulating hormones.

Conditions
Healthy
Being tested
Animal protein, Vegetable protein, Dietary fiber (cereal food matrice), Dietary fiber (meat food matrice), Dietary fiber (vegetable food matrice)
Keywords
Appetite, Protein, Protein quality, Dietary fibre, Satiety

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Animal proteinOther

  • Vegetable proteinOther

  • Dietary fiber (cereal food matrice)Other

  • Dietary fiber (meat food matrice)Other

  • Dietary fiber (vegetable food matrice)Other

Study groups in NCT02521805
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PASham comparatorAnimal protein and no fiber (control)
Receives: Other: Animal protein
PAFExperimentalAnimal protein added fiber
Receives: Other: Animal protein; Other: Dietary fiber (meat food matrice)
PVFExperimentalVegetable protein naturally containing dietary fiber
Receives: Other: Vegetable protein; Other: Dietary fiber (vegetable food matrice)
PAVMExperimentalAnimal protein and dietary fiber in meal
Receives: Other: Animal protein; Other: Dietary fiber (cereal food matrice)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Ad libitum energy intake (kJ)

    Food intake from ad libitum meal

    Measured: Acute (4 hours)

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Subjective appetite ratings (100 mm line scale)

    Measured: Acute (4 hours)

  2. Appetite regulating hormones (analysis)

    Measured: Postprandial concentrations (4 hours)

  3. Glucose (analysis)

    Measured: Postprandial concentrations (4 hours)

  4. Plasma amino acids (analysis)

    Measured: Postprandial concentrations (4 hours)

  5. Insulin (analysis)

    Measured: Postprandial concentrations (4 hours)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Aug 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2015
  3. Primary completionDec 2015
  4. Study completionDec 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
42 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02521805
Sponsor's protocol ID
B316 SAPO 2B
Acronym
SAPO
Status last verified
Apr 2016
First submitted
9 Jul 2015
Last updated
2 May 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Kehlet U, Kofod J, Holst JJ, Ritz C, Aaslyng MD, Raben A. Addition of Rye Bran and Pea Fiber to Pork Meatballs Enhances Subjective Satiety in Healthy Men, but Does Not Change Glycemic or Hormonal Responses: A Randomized Crossover Meal Test Study. J Nutr. 2017 Sep;147(9):1700-1708. doi: 10.3945/jn.117.250332. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

    PubMed 28794212

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Animal protein, Vegetable protein and Dietary fiber (cereal food matrice) in people with Healthy, run by University of Copenhagen at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Ad libitum energy intake (kJ) (time frame: Acute (4 hours)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02521805, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 May 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in