Ulcerative ColitisPhase 3NCT02522780
Mesalamine 2 g Sachet for the Maintenance of Clinical and Endoscopic Remission in Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
A Phase 3 study testing Mesalamine in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Ferring Pharmaceuticals at 96 sites in 11 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this trial was to investigate the safety and efficacy of mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet) once a day (QD) for maintenance of clinical and endoscopic remission in subjects with UC. The duration of treatment for each subject was 6 months. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Ulcerative Colitis
- What is being tested?
- Mesalamine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 276 participants
- Where
- 96 sitesin 11 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2016to 19 Sep 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female subjects aged 18 to 75 years, with Ulcerative Colitis in remission
Who cannot join
- Evidence of other forms of inflammatory bowel disease
- Infectious disease (including human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], hepatitis B virus [HBV], or hepatitis C virus [HCV])
- Disease limited to proctitis <15 cm
- Short bowel syndrome
- Prior colon resection surgery
- History of severe/fulminant UC
Show all 11Show fewer
- Intolerant or allergic to aspirin or salicylate derivatives
- Use of rectal formulations (5-aminosalicylic acid [5-ASA], steroids) within ≤7 days
- Women who are pregnant or nursing
- History of known malignancy
- History of bleeding disorders, active gastric or active duodenal ulcers, autoimmune diseases, or mental/ emotional disorders, that would interfere with their participation in the trial
Trial locations and contacts
96 sites in 11 countries.
96 sites in 11 countries
Ukraine20 sites
Regional Municipal Institution Chernivtsi Regional Clinical Hospital
Chernivtsi
Municipal Institution Dnipropetrovsk Regional Clinical Hospital n.a. I.I. Mechnykov
Dnipropetrovsk
Municipal Healthcare Institution Kharkiv City Clinical Hospital #2
Kharkiv
SI National Institute of Therapy n.a. L.T. Mala of National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine
Kharkiv
Municipal Intitution "Kherson City Clinical Hospital n.a. A. and O. Tropinykh"
Kherson
Private Enterprise Private Manufactire Company "Acinus"
Kirovohrad
Kremenchuk city Hospital # n.a O.T.Bohaievskyi
Kremenchuk
Kyiv Municipal Clinical Hospital #18
Kyiv, Kyïv
Medical Center LLC Ukrainian German Antiulcer Gastroenterology Center BIK Kyiv
Kyiv, Kyïv
Kyiv City Clinical Hospital #8
Kyiv
Kyiv Municipal Clinical Hospital #18
Kyiv
Medical Center Universal Clinic Oberih of LLC Kapytal
Kyiv
Municipal City Clinical emergency Hospital
Lviv
Municipal Institution Odesa Regional Clinical Hospital
Odesa
Medical Clinical Research Center of Medical Center LLC Health Clinic
Vinnytsia
Small Business Private Enterprise Medical Center "Pulse"
Vinnytsia
Vinnytsia Regional Clinical Hospital Hospital n.a. M.I. Pyrohov
Vinnytsia
Municipal Institution 6th City Clinical Hospital of Zaporizhzhia City Council
Zaporizhzhya
Municipal Institution Zaporizhzhia Regional Clinical Hospital of Zaporizhzhia Regional Council
Zaporizhzhya
Medical Centre of PE First Private Clinic
Zhytomyr
United States18 sites
New River Valley Research Institute
Christiansburg, Virginia
Cumberland Research Associates, LLC
Fayetteville, North Carolina
Associates in Gastroenterology, PLC
Hermitage, Tennessee
BI Research Center
Houston, Texas
Biopharma Informatic Inc.
Houston, Texas
Clinical Trials of SWLA, LLC
Lake Charles, Louisiana
Preferred Research Partners
Little Rock, Arkansas
Research Associates of South Florida, LLC
Miami, Florida
United Research Institute
Murrieta, California
Quality Medical Research, PLLC
Nashville, Tennessee
Digestive & Liver Disease Specialists
Norfolk, Virginia
Advanced Research Institute
Ogden, Utah
IMIC
Palmetto Bay, Florida
Digestive Health Center
Pasadena, Texas
Medical Research Center of Florida
Pembroke Pines, Florida
Lenus Research and Medical Group
Sweetwater, Florida
DM Clinical Research
Tomball, Texas
Wilmington Gastroenterology Associates
Wilmington, North Carolina
Russia14 sites
Regional Clinical Hospital
Krasnoyarsk
City Clinical Hospital # 51
Moscow
Nizhegorodskaya Regional Clinical Hospital n.a. Semashko
Nizhny Novgorod
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Novosibirsk
Research Institute of Physiology of Sibirian Branch the RAMS
Novosibirsk
Omsk State Medical Academy
Omsk
Rostov State Medical University
Rostov-on-Don
Ryazan Regional Clinical Hospital
Ryazan
State Budget Institution of Ryazan region" Regional Clinical Hospital"
Ryazan
City Hospital #31
Saint Petersburg
City Polyclinic #38
Saint Petersburg
Russian Medical Military Academy n.a. S.M. Kirov
Saint Petersburg
Medical Company "Hepatolog", LLC
Samara
Stavropol State Medical Academy
Stavropol
Poland12 sites
Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Bialymstoku
Bialystok, Podlaskie Voivodeship
Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej Intermed
Częstochowa
Centrum Badan Klinicznych PI-House sp. z o.o.
Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship
Economicus - NZOZ ALL-MEDICUS
Katowice
Investigational site
Ksawerów
Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej CENTRUM MEDYCZNE Szpital Swietej Rodziny
Lodz
SPZOZ Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny nr 1 im. Norberta Barlickiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Lodzi
Lodz
Osrodek Medycyny Rodzinnej Sp. z o.o.
Sobótka, Lower Silesian Voivodeship
Endoskopia Sp. z o.o.
Sopot
Zespół Przychodni Specjalistycznych PRIMA Sp. z o.o.
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship
Instytut Pomnik Centrum Zdrowia Dziecka
Warsaw
Lexmedica
Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship
Bulgaria9 sites
Multiprofile Hospital For Active Treatment Avis Medica
Pleven
University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Kaspela
Plovdiv
Medical Center Excelsior OOD
Sevlievo
Medical Center-1-Sevlievo EOOD
Sevlievo
City Clinic University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment EOOD
Sofia
Medical Center Asklepion - Humane Medicine Research EOOD
Sofia
University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Sv Ivan Rilski EAD
Sofia
University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Tsaritsa Yoanna - ISUL EAD
Sofia
Diagnostic Consultative Centre Mladost M OOD
Varna
Hungary7 sites
Magyar Honvédség Egészségügyi Központ
Budapest
Pannónia Magánorvosi Centrum Kft
Budapest
Semmelweis Egyetem Institute
Budapest
Vasútegészségügyi Nonprofit Kiemelten Közhasznú Kft. Debreceni Egészségügyi Központja
Debrecen
ENDOMEDIX Kft.
Miskolc
Karolina Korhaz Rendelointezet
Mosonmagyaróvár
Clinfan Kft.
Szekszárd
Latvia5 sites
Polana-D, LTD
Daugavpils
Digestive Diseases Centre Gastro
Riga
Latvian Maritime Medicine Centre
Riga
Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital
Riga
Riga East Clinical University Hospital
Riga
Mexico3 sites
ICARO Investigaciones en Medicina, S.A de C.V
Chihuahua City
Maria Auxiliadora Hospital
Guadalajara
Investigación Biomédica para el Desarrollo de Fármacos, S.A. de C.V.
Zapopan
Serbia3 sites
Clinical Hospital Centar Zvezdara
Belgrade
Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa
Belgrade
Health Center Valjevo
Valjevo
Switzerland3 sites
Inselspital Bern
Bern
Investigational site
Bern
Universitätsspital Zürich
Zurich
Canada2 sites
Topstone Research Institute
Ottawa, Ontario
Toronto Digestive Disease Associates Inc
Toronto, Vaughan
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Mesalamine 2 g Extended Release Granules (Sachet) for Maintenance of Clinical and Endoscopic Remission in Ulcerative Colitis
The purpose of this trial was to investigate the safety and efficacy of mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet) once a day (QD) for maintenance of clinical and endoscopic remission in subjects with UC. The duration of treatment for each subject was 6 months.
- Conditions
- Ulcerative Colitis
- Being tested
- Mesalamine, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Colitis, Ulcerative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MesalamineDrug
Also called Mesalazine, Pentasa
Pharmaceutical form: Granules in sachet; Route of administration: Oral use
PlaceboDrug
Pharmaceutical form: Granules in sachet; Route of administration: Oral use
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mesalamine | Experimental | Mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally once daily (QD) for 6 months. Receives: Drug: Mesalamine |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of Subjects With Remission at Month 6
The proportion of subjects with remission was defined by Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score: 0 for rectal bleeding; 0 or 1 for stool frequency; 0 or 1 for endoscopic score. The Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score ranged between 0 (normal) to 9 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. The score included clinical response component to assess subject's symptoms and endoscopic response component to assess objective evidence of inflammation. Clinical response component had two subscales: stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (>=5 stools more than normal) and rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). The Endoscopic response component had one subscale: flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Measured: Month 6
Secondary outcomes (11)
Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6
The proportion of subjects in clinical remission was defined as a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and 0 or 1 for stool frequency based on clinical response score component of the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score. Clinical response score component had two subscales to assess subject's symptoms: rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes) and stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (>=5 stools more than normal). The scores of clinical response component ranged from 0 (normal) to 6 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Measured: Month 2, 4, and 6
Time to Relapse
Time to relapse was defined as the number of days from randomization to the day of withdrawal due to escalation of therapy. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Measured: Time from randomization to the day of withdrawal due to escalation of therapy (up to 6 months)
Proportion of Subjects With an Increase From Baseline in the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score by 2 or More Points in at Least 1 Component or by 1 or More Points in at Least 2 Components at Month 6
The proportion of subjects with an increase from baseline in the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score by 2 or more points in at least 1 component, or by 1 or more points in at least 2 components were reported. The Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score ranged between 0 (normal) to 9 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. The score included clinical response component to assess subject's symptoms and endoscopic response component to assess objective evidence of inflammation. Clinical Response component had two subscales: stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (>=5 stools more than normal) and rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). The Endoscopic Response component had one subscale: flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Measured: Month 6
Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6
The adjusted mean change from baseline in serum CRP levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Measured: Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6
The adjusted mean change from baseline in fecal calprotectin levels at Month 2, 4, and 6 were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Measured: Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6
The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult subjects with ulcerative colitis. It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items). Subjects were asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best). The total IBDQ was computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better HRQOL. The adjusted mean change from baseline at Month 2, 4, and 6 for the IBDQ total scores were reported. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Measured: Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6
Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject participating in a clinical trial. Any AEs includes serious as well as non-serious AEs. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was an important medical event. Any AE which occurred in the time interval from initial dosing (investigational medicinal product [IMP] intake) to the end of treatment visit (Month 6) was considered treatment-emergent. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Measured: Up to Month 6
Severity of Adverse Events
The number of subjects with intensity of AEs (classified as mild, moderate or severe) were presented. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Measured: Up to Month 6
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in hematology values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (Hematology): Basophils/Leukocytes: >=5%, Eosinophils/Leukocytes: >=10%, Erythrocytes: <=3.5*10^6/μL, Hematocrit: <=0.32%; >=0.56%, Hemoglobin: <=11.5 g/dL, Leukocytes: <=2.8*10^3/μL; >=16.0*10^3/μL, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes: <=10%; >=80%, Monocytes/Leukocytes: >=20%, Neutrophils/Leukocytes: <=15%; >=90%, Platelets: <=75*10^3/μL; >=700*10^3/μL. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Coagulation
Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in coagulation values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (coagulation): Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT): >70 seconds (sec), Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio (INR): <0.8; >1.1. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Proportion of subjects with markedly abnormal changes from baseline in serum chemistry values are presented. Criteria for markedly abnormal laboratory (serum chemistry): Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): >3*upper limit of normal (ULN), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP): >3*ULN and 25% increase (inc) from baseline (BL), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST): >3* ULN, Bilirubin: >=1.5* ULN, Blood Urea Nitrogen: >=10.7 mg/dL, Calcium: <=1.8 mg/dL; >=3.9 mg/dL, Chloride: <=90 mmol/L; >=115 mmol/L, Creatinine: >=177 mg/dL, Gamma Glutamyl Transferase: >3*ULN, Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR): <30 mL/min, Glucose: <=2.8 mg/dL; >=10 mg/dL, Potassium: <=3.0 mmol/L; >=5.8 mmol/L, Sodium: <=130 mmol/L; >=155 mmol/L. Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
Measured: Baseline, Month 6
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Study start1 Feb 2016
- Primary completion19 Sep 2018
- Study completion19 Sep 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Ulcerative ColitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 276 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ferring Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Global Clinical Compliance, Study director, Ferring Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02522780
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 000175
- Other IDs
- 2015-002558-11, 2015
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 12 Aug 2015
- Last updated
- 8 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Mesalamine 2 g Extended Release Granules (Sachet) for Maintenance of Clinical and Endoscopic Remission in Ulcerative Colitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02522780
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 000175
- Conditions
- Ulcerative Colitis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 276 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ferring PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Sep 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 14 Sep 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this trial was to investigate the safety and efficacy of mesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet) once a day (QD) for maintenance of clinical and endoscopic remission in subjects with UC. The duration of treatment for each subject was 6 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mesalamine | Experimental | Drug: MesalamineMesalamine 2 g extended release granules (sachet), administered orally once daily (QD) for 6 months. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo matched to mesalamine extended release granules (sachet), administered orally QD for 6 months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Male or female subjects aged 18 to 75 years, with Ulcerative Colitis in remission
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Evidence of other forms of inflammatory bowel disease
- Infectious disease (including human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], hepatitis B virus [HBV], or hepatitis C virus [HCV])
- Disease limited to proctitis <15 cm
- Short bowel syndrome
- Prior colon resection surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MesalamineAlso: Mesalazine, PentasaPharmaceutical form: Granules in sachet; Route of administration: Oral use | Drug | Mesalamine |
| PlaceboPharmaceutical form: Granules in sachet; Route of administration: Oral use | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Proportion of Subjects With Remission at Month 6
Time frame: Month 6
The proportion of subjects with remission was defined by Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score: 0 for rectal bleeding; 0 or 1 for stool frequency; 0 or 1 for endoscopic score. The Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score ranged between 0 (normal) to 9 (severe disease), higher scores indicating greater disease severity. The score included clinical response component to assess subject's symptoms and endoscopic response component to assess objective evidence of inflammation. Clinical response component had two subscales: stool frequency ranging from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (>=5 stools more than normal) and rectal bleeding ranging from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passes). The Endoscopic response component had one subscale: flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Data is presented cumulative for all pathways.
11 secondary outcomes
Proportion of Subjects in Clinical Remission at Month 2, 4, and 6
Time frame: Month 2, 4, and 6
Time to Relapse
Time frame: Time from randomization to the day of withdrawal due to escalation of therapy (up to 6 months)
Proportion of Subjects With an Increase From Baseline in the Clinical and Endoscopic Response Score by 2 or More Points in at Least 1 Component or by 1 or More Points in at Least 2 Components at Month 6
Time frame: Month 6
Change From Baseline in Serum C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6
Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin Levels at Month 2, 4, and 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Scores at Months 2, 4, and 6
Time frame: Baseline, Month 2, 4, and 6
Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Up to Month 6
Severity of Adverse Events
Time frame: Up to Month 6
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Hematology
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Coagulation
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Proportion of Subjects With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values: Serum Chemistry
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Nov 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Ulcerative Colitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Open-label, DDI Study to Investigate the Effects of Duvakitug on the PK of Selected Cytochrome P450 Substrates
Ulcerative Colitis, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Immunophenotyping of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Ibd CAncer and seRious Infections in France (I-CARE 2)
IBD, Ulcerative Colitis
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Colorectal Dysplasic Lesions and Stratification of Their Evolving Risk in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: a Prospective, Observational and Multicenter Study
Crohn Disease (CD), Colitis Ulcerative
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
MOdel-Informed Precision Dosing of Ustekinumab and VEdolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Crohn Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Global Clinical Compliance study director
Ferring Pharmaceuticals
96 sites in 11 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Mesalamine in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Ferring Pharmaceuticals at 96 sites in 11 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 96 sites in Ukraine, United States, Russia, Poland, Bulgaria and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Sep 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of Subjects With Remission at Month 6 (time frame: Month 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2021.