PROMNCT02524691
Efficacy Study of Rapid Immunoassay Diagnostic Test Utilizing PP12 and AFP, ROM Plus
An observational study of PROM, run by Clinical Innovations, LLC at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The study is designed to establish the level of agreement between the ROM Plus test and the diagnosis of ROM as defined by the patient's clinical course, with respect to a population of pregnant women who present to the clinical site with signs and symptoms suggestive of ROM. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- PROM
- What is being tested?
- Use of Rapid Immunoassay Tests for the Detection of PROM
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 324 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2015to Oct 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Pregnant women undergoing an evaluation for suspected ROM.
Who may be able to join
- Pregnant women >15 weeks gestation undergoing an evaluation for suspected ROM, as indicated by standard site procedures (multiple gestations will not be excluded).
- Patients (or their legal representatives) who are willing to voluntarily agree to sign a consent form.
Who cannot join
- Known placental previa
- Active vaginal bleeding (≥ menstrual period)
- Individuals < 18 years of age.
- Patients (or their legal representatives) who are unwilling to voluntarily agree to sign a consent form.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
Cooper Health System
Camden, New Jersey, 08103
Christiana Care Health Services
Newark, Delaware, 19713
Intermountain Healthcare
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84123
About this study
The study is designed to establish the level of agreement between the ROM Plus test and the diagnosis of ROM as defined by the patient's clinical course, with respect to a population of pregnant women who present to the clinical site with signs and symptoms suggestive of ROM.
Read the detailed description
Premature rupture of membranes (PROM), defined as spontaneous rupture of membranes (ROM) before the onset of uterine contractions, is one of the most common diagnostic dilemmas in contemporary obstetrical practice. Premature rupture of membranes can occur at any gestational age, and preterm PROM (PPROM, defined as PROM before 37 weeks) is responsible for 20-40% of preterm births. Early and accurate diagnosis of PROM would allow for gestational age-specific obstetrical interventions designed to optimize perinatal outcome and minimize serious complications such as cord prolapse, preterm delivery, fetal distress and infectious morbidity (chorioamnionitis, neonatal sepsis). Conversely, a false-positive diagnosis of PROM may lead to unnecessary obstetric interventions, including hospitalization, administration of antibiotics and corticosteroids, and even induction of labor. Therefore, the correct and timely diagnosis of this disorder is of critical importance to the clinician because PROM and PPROM may be associated with serious maternal and neonatal consequences.
The diagnosis of fetal membrane rupture is conventionally made using a clinical assessment. The most common method of diagnosis includes the sterile speculum exam (SSE) which includes visual inspection of pooling of fluid in the posterior fornix, a nitrazine/pH testing of the vaginal environment, and a microscopic evaluation of the collected specimen (ferning). If during the sterile speculum exam, the clinician observes amniotic fluid leaking from the cervical os, then the diagnosis of rupture can be made without the three additional evaluations. Although the SSE approach is considered an acceptable standard, it requires an intrusive (speculum) examination and may not provide a rapid or accurate diagnosis.
The literature has shown the SSE to have limitations in terms of diagnostic accuracy, cost and technical ease. The test becomes progressively less accurate when more than one hour has elapsed after the membranes are ruptured. The nitrazine assessment, which is the most common method of determining the status of the membranes in hospitals today, has a sensitivity reported between 90-97%, but a specificity as low as 16-70%. The poor specificity is thought to be due to a high rate of false-positives caused by cervicitis, vaginitis, and contamination with blood, urine, semen and antiseptic agents. The reported sensitivity and specificity for the fern test are also less than adequate, at 51% and 70% respectively.
As a result, rapid, point of care, qualitative immunochromatographic tests (ie., ROM Plus®, Amnisure®) have recently gained popularity as aids in the diagnosis of fetal membrane rupture. These tests are designed to detect proteins found in amniotic fluid at high concentrations. One such test, ROM Plus, uses a unique monoclonal/polyclonal antibody approach to detect two different proteins found in amniotic fluid at high concentrations. ROM Plus detects Placental Protein-12 (PP-12, also known as Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Protein-1) as well as Alpha Fetoprotein (AFP). The combination of PP12 and AFP were chosen not only because of their robust historical literature support as ideal protein markers for amniotic fluid, but also their unique characteristics. PP12 is synthesized by the decidua of the placenta and reaches a very high concentration level in the amniotic fluid early in the first trimester and stays at that level until delivery. AFP is synthesized by the fetal liver and yolk sac and reaches its peak concentration late in the second trimester/early third trimester. This increases the chance that the proteins will be detected, especially in the preterm patients, when the diagnosis of ROM is most crucial. Amnisure uses a monoclonal/monoclonal antibody approach to detect one protein, Placenta-Alpha Microglobulin-1 (PAMG-1).
This study is designed to assess the performance (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) of ROM Plus and Amnisure as compared to the standard clinical assessment including but not limited to nitrazine, ferning and/or sterile speculum exam confirmed by a thorough chart review after delivery.
- Conditions
- PROM
- Being tested
- Use of Rapid Immunoassay Tests for the Detection of PROM
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Use of Rapid Immunoassay Tests for the Detection of PROMDevice
Also called ROM Plus, Amnisure
Patient will undergo both rapid immunoassay tests for the detection of PROM and the standard of care for the diagnosis of PROM using a sterile speculum (SSE). Women who cannot be confirmed clinically by the SSE will undergo an ultrasound evaluation to determine the amniotic fluid index. The patient will be treated according to the results of the SSE and ultrasound, not the results of rapid immunoassay tests. The provider conducting the SSE will be blinded to the results of the rapid immunoassay tests.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The level of agreement between the ROM Plus test and the diagnosis of ROM as defined by the patient's clinical course, with respect to a population of pregnant women who present to the clinical site with signs and symptoms suggestive of ROM
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Number of tests results from the ROM Plus test that provide the same result as the Amnisure test
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2015
- Primary completionMay 2016
- Study completionOct 2016 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for PROMStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 324 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Clinical Innovations, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ross W McQuivey, MD, Study chair, Clinical Innovations, LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02524691
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CI-002-RP
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 31 Jul 2015
- Last updated
- 9 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy Study of Rapid Immunoassay Diagnostic Test Utilizing PP12 and AFP, ROM Plus
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02524691
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CI-002-RP
- Conditions
- PROM
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 324 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Clinical Innovations, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Aug 2015
- Primary completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2016 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study is designed to establish the level of agreement between the ROM Plus test and the diagnosis of ROM as defined by the patient's clinical course, with respect to a population of pregnant women who present to the clinical site with signs and symptoms suggestive of ROM.
Detailed description
Premature rupture of membranes (PROM), defined as spontaneous rupture of membranes (ROM) before the onset of uterine contractions, is one of the most common diagnostic dilemmas in contemporary obstetrical practice. Premature rupture of membranes can occur at any gestational age, and preterm PROM (PPROM, defined as PROM before 37 weeks) is responsible for 20-40% of preterm births. Early and accurate diagnosis of PROM would allow for gestational age-specific obstetrical interventions designed to optimize perinatal outcome and minimize serious complications such as cord prolapse, preterm delivery, fetal distress and infectious morbidity (chorioamnionitis, neonatal sepsis). Conversely, a false-positive diagnosis of PROM may lead to unnecessary obstetric interventions, including hospitalization, administration of antibiotics and corticosteroids, and even induction of labor. Therefore, the correct and timely diagnosis of this disorder is of critical importance to the clinician because PROM and PPROM may be associated with serious maternal and neonatal consequences.
The diagnosis of fetal membrane rupture is conventionally made using a clinical assessment. The most common method of diagnosis includes the sterile speculum exam (SSE) which includes visual inspection of pooling of fluid in the posterior fornix, a nitrazine/pH testing of the vaginal environment, and a microscopic evaluation of the collected specimen (ferning). If during the sterile speculum exam, the clinician observes amniotic fluid leaking from the cervical os, then the diagnosis of rupture can be made without the three additional evaluations. Although the SSE approach is considered an acceptable standard, it requires an intrusive (speculum) examination and may not provide a rapid or accurate diagnosis.
The literature has shown the SSE to have limitations in terms of diagnostic accuracy, cost and technical ease. The test becomes progressively less accurate when more than one hour has elapsed after the membranes are ruptured. The nitrazine assessment, which is the most common method of determining the status of the membranes in hospitals today, has a sensitivity reported between 90-97%, but a specificity as low as 16-70%. The poor specificity is thought to be due to a high rate of false-positives caused by cervicitis, vaginitis, and contamination with blood, urine, semen and antiseptic agents. The reported sensitivity and specificity for the fern test are also less than adequate, at 51% and 70% respectively.
As a result, rapid, point of care, qualitative immunochromatographic tests (ie., ROM Plus®, Amnisure®) have recently gained popularity as aids in the diagnosis of fetal membrane rupture. These tests are designed to detect proteins found in amniotic fluid at high concentrations. One such test, ROM Plus, uses a unique monoclonal/polyclonal antibody approach to detect two different proteins found in amniotic fluid at high concentrations. ROM Plus detects Placental Protein-12 (PP-12, also known as Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Protein-1) as well as Alpha Fetoprotein (AFP). The combination of PP12 and AFP were chosen not only because of their robust historical literature support as ideal protein markers for amniotic fluid, but also their unique characteristics. PP12 is synthesized by the decidua of the placenta and reaches a very high concentration level in the amniotic fluid early in the first trimester and stays at that level until delivery. AFP is synthesized by the fetal liver and yolk sac and reaches its peak concentration late in the second trimester/early third trimester. This increases the chance that the proteins will be detected, especially in the preterm patients, when the diagnosis of ROM is most crucial. Amnisure uses a monoclonal/monoclonal antibody approach to detect one protein, Placenta-Alpha Microglobulin-1 (PAMG-1).
This study is designed to assess the performance (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) of ROM Plus and Amnisure as compared to the standard clinical assessment including but not limited to nitrazine, ferning and/or sterile speculum exam confirmed by a thorough chart review after delivery.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Pregnant women undergoing an evaluation for suspected ROM.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Pregnant women >15 weeks gestation undergoing an evaluation for suspected ROM, as indicated by standard site procedures (multiple gestations will not be excluded).
- Patients (or their legal representatives) who are willing to voluntarily agree to sign a consent form.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Known placental previa
- Active vaginal bleeding (≥ menstrual period)
- Individuals < 18 years of age.
- Patients (or their legal representatives) who are unwilling to voluntarily agree to sign a consent form.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Use of Rapid Immunoassay Tests for the Detection of PROMAlso: ROM Plus, AmnisurePatient will undergo both rapid immunoassay tests for the detection of PROM and the standard of care for the diagnosis of PROM using a sterile speculum (SSE). Women who cannot be confirmed clinically by the SSE will undergo an ultrasound evaluation to determine the amniotic fluid index. The patient will be treated according to the results of the SSE and ultrasound, not the results of rapid immunoassay tests. The provider conducting the SSE will be blinded to the results of the rapid immunoassay tests. | Device | – |
Primary outcome
The level of agreement between the ROM Plus test and the diagnosis of ROM as defined by the patient's clinical course, with respect to a population of pregnant women who present to the clinical site with signs and symptoms suggestive of ROM
Time frame: 3 months
1 secondary outcome
Number of tests results from the ROM Plus test that provide the same result as the Amnisure test
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Aug 2016.
Related trials for PROM
RecruitingPhase 3
Selective Antibiotics When Symptoms Develop Versus Universal Antibiotics for Preterm Neonates
Sepsis, PROM, Preterm (Pregnancy)
Recruiting
Amnioinfusion for Chorioamnionitis: Targeting Neonatal Brain Injury Biomarkers
Chorioamnionitis Affecting Fetus or Newborn, Amnioinfusion
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Evaluation of the Anti-Plaque and Anti-Gingivitis Effects of Nanobiofusion Gingival Gel (NBF), Placebo Gel, and Commercial Toothpaste
Gingivitis, Healthy Adult
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Turkish Version of the Ankle Fracture Outcome of Rehabilitation Measure (A-FORM-TR): A Multi-Centre Validation Study
Ankle Fractures, Ankle Injuries
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Erythromycin Versus Azithromycin for Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes
Premature Rupture of Membrane
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ross W McQuivey, MD study chair
Clinical Innovations, LLC
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of PROM, run by Clinical Innovations, LLC at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The level of agreement between the ROM Plus test and the diagnosis of ROM as defined by the patient's clinical course, with respect to a population of pregnant women who present to the clinical site with signs and symptoms suggestive of ROM (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2016.