Hepatocellular CarcinomaNCT02526043
Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
A study testing laparoscopic hepatectomy and Open hepatectomy in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Fudan University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to observe the curative effect and safety of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- laparoscopic hepatectomy and Open hepatectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 180 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Aug 2015to Dec 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis was HCC
- The tumor was located in segment: II, III, IVb, V, VI
- The tumor diameter < 5cm
- Without thrombosis in the portal vein, hepatic vein or bile duct
- Without intrahepatic and systemic metastasis
- The Child-pugh score was A-B7
Show all 9Show fewer
- The ASA(American Society of Anesthesiologists) score was I-III
- The patient age was between 18-75
- Sign the informed consent, and can fully understand the research content
Who cannot join
- Have surgery contraindications
- Pregnant or lactating women
- The Child-pugh score was B8-C
- The ASA(American Society of Anesthesiologists) score was IV-V
- With other malignant tumor
- With mental illness
- Participated in other clinical trials in the last three months
- Underwent other treatments(chemotherapy or radiotherapy) before operation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Randomized Control Trail of Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
The purpose of the study is to observe the curative effect and safety of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Read the detailed description
Liver resection is the most important treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Open hepatectomy was regarded as a giant surgery because of its big incision, influence of the liver function, and long hospital stay. Laparoscopic hepatectomy was widely used since it was reported by Reich in 1991. With the constant innovation of laparoscopic technique and equipment, there is no penalty area in laparoscopic hepatectomy. The Louisville consensus proposed that the best indication for laparoscopic hepatectomy was the tumor diameter < 5cm, located in segment II-VI.
Previous studies shows that compared with the open surgery, laparoscopic hepatectomy has the advantages of shorter operation time, less bleeding, shorter hospitalization time. The mortality, mobility, the overall survival and the disease-free survival was same in these two groups.
So far, however, the curative effect and safety research of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for HCC is limited to retrospective study and case-control study. A prospective, randomized, controlled study is urgently needed.
This study was proceeded to observe the curative effect and safety of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for HCC.
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Being tested
- laparoscopic hepatectomy, Open hepatectomy
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
laparoscopic hepatectomyProcedure or surgery
The HCC patients who meet the Louisville consensus will underwent liver resection by laparoscopy
Open hepatectomyProcedure or surgery
The HCC patients who meet the Louisville consensus will underwent liver resection by open surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| laparoscopic hepatectomy | Experimental | The HCC patients who meet the Louisville consensus will be underwent the liver resection by laparoscopic surgery Receives: Procedure: laparoscopic hepatectomy |
| Open hepatectomy | Experimental | The HCC patients who meet the Louisville consensus will be underwent the liver resection by open surgery Receives: Procedure: Open hepatectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall survival
The overall survival of HCC patients after operation
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
Disease free survival
The disease free survival of HCC patients after operation
Measured: 5 years
Incidence of postoperative complications
Incidence of postoperative complications
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2015
- Primary completionDec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hepatocellular CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Fudan UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fudan University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lunxiu Qin, Fudan University
- Investigators
- Lunxiu Qin, MD, Principal investigator, Department of general surgery, Huashan hospital, Fudan University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02526043
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Huashan 002
- Status last verified
- Aug 2022
- First submitted
- 5 Aug 2015
- Last updated
- 18 Aug 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ishizawa T, Gumbs AA, Kokudo N, Gayet B. Laparoscopic segmentectomy of the liver: from segment I to VIII. Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):959-64. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825ffed3.
PubMed 22968066Reich H, McGlynn F, DeCaprio J, Budin R. Laparoscopic excision of benign liver lesions. Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Nov;78(5 Pt 2):956-8.
PubMed 1833688Chen KH, Jeng KS, Huang SH, Chu SH. Laparoscopic caudate hepatectomy for cancer--an innovative approach to the no-man's land. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Mar;17(3):522-6. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2115-z. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
PubMed 23297026Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O'Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D'Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J, Strasberg S, Chari RS; World Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Surgery. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):825-30. doi: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b3b2d8.
PubMed 19916210Afaneh C, Kluger MD. Laparoscopic liver resection: lessons at the end of the second decade. Semin Liver Dis. 2013 Aug;33(3):226-35. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1351780. Epub 2013 Aug 13. Danish, English.
PubMed 23943103Bryant R, Laurent A, Tayar C, Cherqui D. Laparoscopic liver resection-understanding its role in current practice: the Henri Mondor Hospital experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Jul;250(1):103-11. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad6660.
PubMed 19561476Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, Vandeweyer H, Penninckx F. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection of hepatic neoplasms: comparative analysis of short-term results. Surg Endosc. 2008 Oct;22(10):2208-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0023-9. Epub 2008 Jul 12.
PubMed 18622562Tranchart H, Di Giuro G, Lainas P, Roudie J, Agostini H, Franco D, Dagher I. Laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched-pair comparative study. Surg Endosc. 2010 May;24(5):1170-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0745-3. Epub 2009 Nov 14.
PubMed 19915908Cai XJ, Yang J, Yu H, Liang X, Wang YF, Zhu ZY, Peng SY. Clinical study of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors. Surg Endosc. 2008 Nov;22(11):2350-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9789-z. Epub 2008 Feb 23.
PubMed 18297354Dagher I, Lainas P, Carloni A, Caillard C, Champault A, Smadja C, Franco D. Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2008 Feb;22(2):372-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9487-2. Epub 2007 Aug 18.
PubMed 17704878Lee KF, Chong CN, Wong J, Cheung YS, Wong J, Lai P. Long-term results of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-matched analysis. World J Surg. 2011 Oct;35(10):2268-74. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1212-6.
PubMed 21842300Slim A, Garancini M, Di Sandro S, Mangoni I, Lauterio A, Giacomoni A, De Carlis L. Laparoscopic versus open liver surgery: a single center analysis of post-operative in-hospital and post-discharge results. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Dec;397(8):1305-11. doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-0992-y. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
PubMed 22918605Yin Z, Fan X, Ye H, Yin D, Wang J. Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Apr;20(4):1203-15. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2705-8. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
PubMed 23099728
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Aug 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Randomized Control Trail of Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02526043
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Huashan 002
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fudan UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2015
- Primary completion
- Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to observe the curative effect and safety of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Detailed description
Liver resection is the most important treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Open hepatectomy was regarded as a giant surgery because of its big incision, influence of the liver function, and long hospital stay. Laparoscopic hepatectomy was widely used since it was reported by Reich in 1991. With the constant innovation of laparoscopic technique and equipment, there is no penalty area in laparoscopic hepatectomy. The Louisville consensus proposed that the best indication for laparoscopic hepatectomy was the tumor diameter < 5cm, located in segment II-VI.
Previous studies shows that compared with the open surgery, laparoscopic hepatectomy has the advantages of shorter operation time, less bleeding, shorter hospitalization time. The mortality, mobility, the overall survival and the disease-free survival was same in these two groups.
So far, however, the curative effect and safety research of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for HCC is limited to retrospective study and case-control study. A prospective, randomized, controlled study is urgently needed.
This study was proceeded to observe the curative effect and safety of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for HCC.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| laparoscopic hepatectomy | Experimental | Procedure: laparoscopic hepatectomyThe HCC patients who meet the Louisville consensus will be underwent the liver resection by laparoscopic surgery |
| Open hepatectomy | Experimental | Procedure: Open hepatectomyThe HCC patients who meet the Louisville consensus will be underwent the liver resection by open surgery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Diagnosis was HCC
- The tumor was located in segment: II, III, IVb, V, VI
- The tumor diameter < 5cm
- Without thrombosis in the portal vein, hepatic vein or bile duct
- Without intrahepatic and systemic metastasis
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Have surgery contraindications
- Pregnant or lactating women
- The Child-pugh score was B8-C
- The ASA(American Society of Anesthesiologists) score was IV-V
- With other malignant tumor
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| laparoscopic hepatectomyThe HCC patients who meet the Louisville consensus will underwent liver resection by laparoscopy | Procedure or surgery | laparoscopic hepatectomy |
| Open hepatectomyThe HCC patients who meet the Louisville consensus will underwent liver resection by open surgery | Procedure or surgery | Open hepatectomy |
Primary outcome
Overall survival
Time frame: 5 years
The overall survival of HCC patients after operation
2 secondary outcomes
Disease free survival
Time frame: 5 years
Incidence of postoperative complications
Time frame: 1 month
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Aug 2022.
- Background: PubMed 22968066Ishizawa T, Gumbs AA, Kokudo N, Gayet B. Laparoscopic segmentectomy of the liver: from segment I to VIII. Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):959-64. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825ffed3.
- Background: PubMed 1833688Reich H, McGlynn F, DeCaprio J, Budin R. Laparoscopic excision of benign liver lesions. Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Nov;78(5 Pt 2):956-8.
- Background: PubMed 23297026Chen KH, Jeng KS, Huang SH, Chu SH. Laparoscopic caudate hepatectomy for cancer--an innovative approach to the no-man's land. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Mar;17(3):522-6. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2115-z. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
- Background: PubMed 19916210Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O'Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D'Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J, Strasberg S, Chari RS; World Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Surgery. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):825-30. doi: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b3b2d8.
- Background: PubMed 23943103Afaneh C, Kluger MD. Laparoscopic liver resection: lessons at the end of the second decade. Semin Liver Dis. 2013 Aug;33(3):226-35. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1351780. Epub 2013 Aug 13. Danish, English.
- Results publication: PubMed 19561476Bryant R, Laurent A, Tayar C, Cherqui D. Laparoscopic liver resection-understanding its role in current practice: the Henri Mondor Hospital experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Jul;250(1):103-11. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad6660.
- Results publication: PubMed 18622562Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, Vandeweyer H, Penninckx F. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection of hepatic neoplasms: comparative analysis of short-term results. Surg Endosc. 2008 Oct;22(10):2208-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0023-9. Epub 2008 Jul 12.
- Results publication: PubMed 19915908Tranchart H, Di Giuro G, Lainas P, Roudie J, Agostini H, Franco D, Dagher I. Laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched-pair comparative study. Surg Endosc. 2010 May;24(5):1170-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0745-3. Epub 2009 Nov 14.
- Results publication: PubMed 18297354Cai XJ, Yang J, Yu H, Liang X, Wang YF, Zhu ZY, Peng SY. Clinical study of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors. Surg Endosc. 2008 Nov;22(11):2350-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9789-z. Epub 2008 Feb 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 17704878Dagher I, Lainas P, Carloni A, Caillard C, Champault A, Smadja C, Franco D. Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2008 Feb;22(2):372-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9487-2. Epub 2007 Aug 18.
- Results publication: PubMed 21842300Lee KF, Chong CN, Wong J, Cheung YS, Wong J, Lai P. Long-term results of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-matched analysis. World J Surg. 2011 Oct;35(10):2268-74. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1212-6.
- Results publication: PubMed 22918605Slim A, Garancini M, Di Sandro S, Mangoni I, Lauterio A, Giacomoni A, De Carlis L. Laparoscopic versus open liver surgery: a single center analysis of post-operative in-hospital and post-discharge results. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Dec;397(8):1305-11. doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-0992-y. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
NIVO+IPI Neoadjuvant Therapy for Recurrent Resectable HCC
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), Recurrent Hepatocellular Cancer
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Liver Cancer Registry Platform
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), Cholangiocarcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Durvalumab and Tremelimumab in Combination With Propranolol and Chemotherapy for Treatment of Advanced Hepatopancreabiliary Tumors (BLOCKED)
Pancreatic Cancer, Hepatocellular Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Characterizing Tumor Hypoxia With BOLD-MRI to Predict Y-90 Treatment Response
Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Liver Cancer
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Detect and Expunge Concealed Tumors of the Liver
Liver Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lunxiu Qin, MD principal investigator
Department of general surgery, Huashan hospital, Fudan University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing laparoscopic hepatectomy and Open hepatectomy in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Fudan University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall survival (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02526043, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Aug 2022.