Metabolism and Nutrition DisorderPhase 3NCT02527200
Effect of Liraglutide for Weight Management in Paediatric Subjects With Prader-Willi Syndrome
A Phase 3 study testing liraglutide in people with Metabolism and Nutrition Disorder and Obesity, run by Novo Nordisk A/S at 32 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
This trial is conducted globally. The aim of this trial is to investigate the effect of liraglutide for weight management in paediatric subjects with Prader-Willi Syndrome. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Metabolism and Nutrition Disorder, Obesity
- What is being tested?
- liraglutide
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 56 participants
- Where
- 32 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- 9 Nov 2015to 19 Nov 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Informed consent obtained before any trial-related activities. Trial-related activities are any procedures that are carried out as part of the trial, including activities to determine suitability for the trial
- Confirmed diagnosis of PWS (Prader-Willi Syndrome) (by genetic testing)
- Male or female, age at the time of signing informed consent: - Part A: above or equal to 12 years and less than 18 years
- Tanner stage 2-5 pubertal development for part A, and Tanner stage 1 for part B
- BMI (body mass index) corresponding to equal or above 30 kg/m^2 for adults by international cut-off points1 and equal or above the 95th percentile for age and sex (for diagnosis of obesity)
- Stable body weight during the previous 90 days before screening ( below 10 kg self-reported weight change)
- Testing has been performed to evaluate for adrenal insufficiency and documented in medical record
Who cannot join
- Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM)
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)
- Calcitonin equal or above 50 ng/L
- No change in treatment plan with growth hormone (GH) from randomisation to the end of the open-label period patients on growth hormone to stay on, patients off GH to stay off during this period. Adjustments in doses of growth hormone will be permitted)
- Family or personal history of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2 (MEN2) or Medullary Thyroids Carcinoma (MTC)
- History of pancreatitis (acute or chronic)
Show all 9Show fewer
- Treatment with any medication prescribed for weight loss within 90 days before screening (e.g. orlistat, zonisamide, topiramate/phentermine, lorcaserin, phentermine, bupropion/naltrexone,liraglutide, metformin)
- Untreated adrenal insufficiency
- Suggestive history of, or significant risk of gastroparesis (e.g. marked abdominal bloating post meal, history of vomiting, severe constipation), as judged by the Investigator
Trial locations and contacts
32 sites in 8 countries.
32 sites in 8 countries
France13 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Angers, 49033
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bordeaux, 33076
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Brest, 29609
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bron, 69677
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Haguenau, 67504
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Lille, 59037
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Marseille Cédex 05, 13385
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Montpellier, 34295
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Nice, 06200
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Paris, 75012
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Paris, 75015
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Rouen, 76031
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Toulouse, 31059
United States5 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21229
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Buffalo, New York, 14203
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43235
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Mineola, New York, 11501
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Ankara, 06010
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Istanbul, 34093
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Istanbul, 34890
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Samsun, 55139
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Trabzon, 61080
Italy3 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Fiumicino, 00050
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Milan, 20132
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Padova, 35128
Australia2 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Parkville, Victoria, 3052
Canada2 sites
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Calgary, Alberta, T3B 6A8
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1
About this study
Official title: Effect of Liraglutide for Weight Management in Paediatric Subjects With Prader-Willi Syndrome.
This trial is conducted globally. The aim of this trial is to investigate the effect of liraglutide for weight management in paediatric subjects with Prader-Willi Syndrome.
- Conditions
- Metabolism and Nutrition Disorder, Obesity
- Being tested
- liraglutide, placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Nutrition Disorders, Obesity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
liraglutideDrug
Injected s.c./ subcutaneously (under the skin) This trial consists of a part A and a part B. Part A of the trial is conducted in obese adolescents with PWS. Part B of the trial is conducted in obese children with PWS. Entry into part A and part B of the trial will be sequential.
placeboDrug
Injected s.c./ subcutaneously (under the skin) This trial consists of a part A and a part B. Part A of the trial is conducted in obese adolescents with PWS. Part B of the trial is conducted in obese children with PWS. Entry into part A and part B of the trial will be sequential.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: liraglutide |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS) From Baseline to 16 Weeks
Change in BMI SDS from baseline to week 16 is presented. BMI SDS also called Z-scores, was calculated using the following formula: Z=[(y / M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), Box-cox power (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents', y= individual BMI. BMI provided for each sex and age. For each participant, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. Possible values range from -3 to +3, a negative score being beneficial.
Measured: Week 0, Week 16
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS) From Baseline to 52 Weeks
Change in BMI SDS from baseline to week 52 is presented. BMI SDS also called Z-scores, was calculated using the following formula: Z=[(y / M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), Box-cox power (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents', y= individual BMI. BMI provided for each sex and age. For each participant, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. Possible values range from -3 to +3, a negative score being beneficial.
Measured: Week 0, Week 52
Secondary outcomes (104)
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 5% Reduction in Baseline BMI at Week 16
Percentage of participants achieving more than or equal to (≥) 5% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 16 is presented. In below table, 'Yes' infers percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 5% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 16 and 'No' infers percentage of participants who did not achieve ≥ 5% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 16.
Measured: At week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 5% Reduction in Baseline BMI at Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving more than or equal to (≥) 5% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 52 is presented. In below table, 'Yes' infers percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 5% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 52 and 'No' infers percentage of participants who did not achieve ≥ 5% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 52.
Measured: At week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 10% Reduction in Baseline BMI at Week 16
Percentage of participants achieving more than or equal to (≥) 10% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 16 is presented. In below table, 'Yes' infers percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 10% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 16 and 'No' infers percentage of participants who did not achieve ≥ 10% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 16.
Measured: At week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 10% Reduction in Baseline BMI at Week 52
Percentage of participants achieving more than or equal to (≥) 10% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 52 is presented. In below table, 'Yes' infers percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 10% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 52 and 'No' infers percentage of participants who did not achieve ≥ 10% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 52.
Measured: At week 52
Percentage of Participants With no Increase in BMI SDS at Week 16
Percentage of participants with no increase in BMI SDS at week 16 is presented. In below table, 'Yes' infers percentage of participants with no increase in BMI SDS at week 16 and 'No' infers percentage of participants with increase in BMI SDS at week 16.
Measured: At week 16
Percentage of Participants With no Increase in BMI SDS at Week 52
Percentage of participants with no increase in BMI SDS at week 52 is presented. In below table, 'Yes' infers percentage of participants with no increase in BMI SDS at week 52 and 'No' infers percentage of participants with increase in BMI SDS at week 52.
Measured: At week 52
Change in BMI From Baseline at Week 16
Change in body mass index (BMI) from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in BMI From Baseline at Week 52
Change in body mass index (BMI) from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Body Weight (Kilogram (kg)) From Baseline at Week 16
Change in body weight (kg) from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Body Weight (kg) From Baseline at Week 52
Change in body weight (kg) from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Body Weight (Pounds (lb)) From Baseline at Week 16
Change in body weight (lb) from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Body Weight (lb) From Baseline at Week 52
Change in body weight (lb) from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Body Weight (Percentage [%]) From Baseline at Week 16
Change in body weight (%) from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Body Weight (%) From Baseline at Week 52
Change in body weight (%) from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Waist Circumference From Baseline at Week 16
Change in waist circumference from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Waist Circumference From Baseline at Week 52
Change in waist circumference from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Waist-to-hip Circumference Ratio From Baseline at Week 16
Change in waist-to-hip circumference ratio from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Waist-to-hip Circumference Ratio From Baseline at Week 52
Change in waist-to-hip circumference ratio from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Hyperphagia Score: Total Score and Hyperphagic Behaviour, Drive and Severity Score From Baseline at Week 16
Change in hyperphagia score (hyperphagia total score and hyperphagic behaviour, drive and severity score respectively), from baseline to week 16 is presented. The Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Total Score. It contains 11 questions which are categorised into 3 subscales; Hyperphagic Behaviour, Hyperphagic Drive, and Hyperphagia Severity. The subscales are summed together to compute the Total Score. The Total Score ranges from 11-55, with higher scores indicating more hyperphagia and a worse outcome. The HQ-Behaviour Factor Score ranges from 5-25, with higher scores indicating more hyperphagic behaviours and a worse outcome. The HQ- Drive Factor Score ranges from 4-20, with higher scores indicating higher hyperphagic drive and a worse outcome. The HQ- Severity Factor Score ranges from 2-10, with higher scores indicating higher severity.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Hyperphagia Score: Total Score and Hyperphagic Behaviour, Drive and Severity Score From Baseline at Week 52
Change in hyperphagia score (hyperphagia total score and hyperphagic behaviour, drive and severity score respectively), from baseline to week 52 is presented.The Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ)- Total Score. It contains 11 questions which are categorised into 3 subscales; Hyperphagic Behaviour, Hyperphagic Drive, and Hyperphagia Severity. The subscales are summed together to compute the Total Score. The Total Score ranges from 11-55, with higher scores indicating more hyperphagia and a worse outcome. The HQ-Behaviour Factor Score ranges from 5-25, with higher scores indicating more hyperphagic behaviours and a worse outcome. The HQ- Drive Factor Score ranges from 4-20, with higher scores indicating higher hyperphagic drive and a worse outcome. The HQ- Severity Factor Score ranges from 2-10, with higher scores indicating higher severity.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in High Sensitivity C Reactive Protein (hsCRP) From Baseline at Week 16
Change in hsCRP from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in High Sensitivity C Reactive Protein (hsCRP) From Baseline at Week 52
Change in hsCRP from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline at Week 16
Change in Total cholesterol (measured as millimoles per liter (mmol/L) from baseline to week 16 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline at Week 52
Change in total cholesterol (measured as millimoles per liter (mmol/L) from baseline to week 52 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL)-Cholesterol From Baseline at Week 16
Change in LDL-cholesterol (measured as mmol/L) from baseline to week 16 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL)-Cholesterol From Baseline at Week 52
Change in LDL-cholesterol (measured as mmol/L) from baseline to week 52 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL)-Cholesterol From Baseline at Week 16
Change in HDL-cholesterol (measured as mmol/L) from baseline to week 16 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL)-Cholesterol From Baseline at Week 52
Change in HDL-cholesterol (measured as mmol/L) from baseline to week 52 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Non-high Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL) Cholesterol From Baseline at Week 16
Change in non-HDL cholesterol (measured as mmol/L) from baseline to week 16 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Non-high Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL) Cholesterol From Baseline at Week 52
Change in non-HDL cholesterol (measured as mmol/L) from baseline to week 52 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Very Low-density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol From Baseline at Week 16
Change in VLDL cholesterol (measured as mmol/L) from baseline to week 16 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Very Low-density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol From Baseline at Week 52
Change in VLDL cholesterol (measured as mmol/L) from baseline to week 52 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Triglycerides From Baseline at Week 16
Change in triglycerides (measured as mmol/L) from baseline to week 16 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Triglycerides From Baseline at Week 52
Change in triglycerides (measured as mmol/L) from baseline to week 52 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Fasting Lipid: Free Fatty Acids (FFA) From Baseline at Week 16
Change in free fatty acids (measured as mmol/L) from baseline to week 16 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Fasting Lipid: Free Fatty Acids (FFA) From Baseline at Week 52
Change in free fatty acids (measured as mmol/L) from baseline to week 52 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline at Week 16
Change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline at Week 52
Change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline at Week 16
Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in HbA1c From Baseline at Week 52
Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline at Week 16
Change in FPG from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in FPG From Baseline at Week 52
Change in FPG from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Fasting Insulin From Baseline at Week 16
Change in fasting insulin (measured as picomoles per litre (pmol/L)) from baseline to week 16 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Fasting Insulin From Baseline at Week 52
Change in fasting insulin (measured as picomoles per litre (pmol/L)) from baseline to week 52 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Fasting C Peptide From Baseline at Week 16
Change in fasting C peptide (measured as nano moles per liter (nmol/L)) from baseline to week 16 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Fasting C Peptide From Baseline at Week 52
Change in fasting C peptide (measured as nano moles per liter (nmol/L)) from baseline to week 52 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Number of Participants in Glycaemic Category at Week 16
Number of participants in glycaemic categories, "normoglycaemia, pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes" at Week 16 are presented. These categories were set as per the following criteria: 1) Normoglycaemia: FPG <5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL) and/or HbA1c <5.7%. 2) Pre-diabetes: FPG 5.6-6.9 mmol/L (both inclusive), FPG 100-125 mg/dL (both inclusive) or HbA1c 5.7-6.4% (both inclusive). 3) Type 2 diabetes: FPG ≥7.0 mmol/L (≥126 mg/dL) and/or HbA1c ≥6.5%.
Measured: week 16
Number of Participants in Glycaemic Category at Week 52
Number of participants in glycaemic categories, "normoglycaemia, pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes" at Week 52 are presented. These categories were set as per the following criteria: 1) Normoglycaemia: FPG <5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL) and/or HbA1c <5.7%. 2) Pre-diabetes: FPG 5.6-6.9 mmol/L (both inclusive), FPG 100-125 mg/dL (both inclusive) or HbA1c 5.7-6.4% (both inclusive). 3) Type 2 diabetes: FPG ≥7.0 mmol/L (≥126 mg/dL) and/or HbA1c ≥6.5%.
Measured: Week 52
Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B) From Baseline at Week 16
Change in HOMA-B from baseline to week 16 is presented as ratio to baseline. HOMA-B was calculated as: Beta-cell function (%) = 20·fasting insulin[mU/L]/(FPG[mmol/L]-3.5).
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B) From Baseline at Week 52
Change in HOMA-B from baseline to week 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. HOMA-B was calculated as: Beta-cell function (%) = 20·fasting insulin[mU/L]/(FPG[mmol/L]-3.5).
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) From Baseline at Week 16
Change in HOMA-IR from baseline to week 16 is presented as ratio to baseline. HOMA-IR was calculated as: Insulin resistance (%) = fasting plasma glucose [mmol/L] x fasting insulin [mmol/L]/ 22.5.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) From Baseline at Week 52
Change in HOMA-IR from baseline to week 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. HOMA-IR was calculated as: Insulin resistance (%) = fasting plasma glucose [mmol/L] x fasting insulin [mmol/L]/ 22.5.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant administered or using a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or usage. All AEs reported here are TEAEs. TEAE is defined as an event that had onset date during the on-treatment period. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from on-treatment period. On-treatment period included AEs are with an onset date on or after the first day of trial product administration and any of the following dates, whichever came first: a) 14 days after the last day on trial product, or b) Follow-up visit (week 54) for participants with trial product discontinuation, or c) Last study visit (participants withdrawn without follow-up visit (week 54)).
Measured: From week 0 to week 54
Number of Severe Treatment Emergent Episodes of Hypoglycaemia
Hypoglycaemic episode (blood glucose less than or equal to (<=) 3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) Or greater than (>) 3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) occurring in conjunction with hypoglycaemic symptoms) is defined as treatment emergent if the onset of the episode was on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than 14 days after the last day on randomised treatment. Severe hypoglycaemia defined by American Diabetes Association (ADA) 2013 and International Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD) 2018: hypoglycaemic episode associated with severe cognitive impairment requiring external assistance for recovery. Endpoint was evaluated based on data from in-trial period which was defined as events with onset date on or after the first day of trial product administration and no later than the last study visit (week 54).
Measured: From week 0 to week 54
Number of Blood Glucose Confirmed Symptomatic Episodes of Hypoglycaemia
Symptomatic blood glucose confirmed hypoglycaemia: An episode that is blood glucose confirmed by plasma glucose value < 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episode is defined as treatment emergent if the onset of the episode was on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than 14 days after the last day on randomised treatment. Endpoint was evaluated based on data from in-trial period which was defined as events with onset date on or after the first day of trial product administration and no later than the last study visit (week 54).
Measured: From week 0 to week 54
Number of Participants With Occurrence of Anti-liraglutide Antibodies
Number of participants with occurrence of anti-liraglutide antibodies is presented. In the below table, 'Yes' infers number of participants with occurrence of anti- liraglutide antibodies and 'No' infers number of participants without anti- liraglutide antibodies.
Measured: From week 0 to week 54
Number of Participants With Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG) From Baseline at Week 16
A 12-lead ECG was performed at baseline (week 0) and week 16 and categorised as normal, abnormal and not clinically significant (abnormal NCS) or abnormal and clinically significant (abnormal CS). Number of participants in each ECG category at week 0 and weeks 16 are presented.
Measured: Week 0, Week 16
Number of Participants With Change in ECG From Baseline at Week 52
A 12-lead ECG was performed at baseline (week 0) and week 52 and categorised as normal, abnormal and not clinically significant (abnormal NCS) or abnormal and clinically significant (abnormal CS). Number of participants in each ECG category at week 0 and week 52 are presented.
Measured: Week 0, Week 52
Change in Pulse From Baseline at Week 16
Change in pulse from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Pulse From Baseline at Week 52
Change in pulse from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Haematology: Haemoglobin From Baseline at Week 16
Change in haemoglobin from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Haematology: Haemoglobin From Baseline at Week 52
Change in haemoglobin from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Haematology: Haematocrit From Baseline at Week 16
Change in haematocrit from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Haematology: Haematocrit From Baseline at Week 52
Change in haematocrit from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Haematology: Thrombocytes, Leukocytes, Eosinophils, Neutrophils, Basophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes From Baseline at Week 16
Change in thrombocytes, leukocytes, eosinophils, neutrophils, basophils, lymphocytes, monocytes from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Haematology: Thrombocytes, Leukocytes, Eosinophils, Neutrophils, Basophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes From Baseline at Week 52
Change in thrombocytes, leukocytes, eosinophils, neutrophils, basophils, lymphocytes, monocytes from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Haematology: Erythrocytes From Baseline at Week 16
Change in erythrocytes from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Haematology: Erythrocytes From Baseline at Week 52
Change in erythrocytes from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Biochemistry: Creatinine and Bilirubin (Total) From Baseline at Week 16
Change in creatinine and bilirubin (total) from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Biochemistry: Creatinine and Bilirubin (Total) From Baseline at Week 52
Change in creatinine and bilirubin (total) from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Biochemistry: Creatine Kinase, Amylase, Lipase, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) From Baseline at Week 16
Change in creatine kinase, amylase, lipase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Biochemistry: Creatine Kinase, Amylase, Lipase, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) From Baseline at Week 52
Change in creatine kinase, amylase, lipase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Biochemistry: Urea, Sodium, Potassium, Calcium Total and Calcium Albumin-corrected From Baseline at Week 16
Change in urea, sodium, potassium, calcium total and calcium albumin-corrected from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Biochemistry: Urea, Sodium, Potassium, Calcium Total and Calcium Albumin-corrected From Baseline at Week 52
Change in urea, sodium, potassium, calcium total and calcium albumin-corrected from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Biochemistry: Albumin From Baseline at Week 16
Change in albumin from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Biochemistry: Albumin From Baseline at Week 52
Change in albumin from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Hormone Level: Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) From Baseline at Week 16
Change in CEA serum from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Hormone Level: Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) From Baseline at Week 52
Change in CEA serum from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Hormone Level: Calcitonin From Baseline at Week 16
Change in calcitonin from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Hormone Level: Calcitonin From Baseline at Week 52
Change in calcitonin from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Hormone Level: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) and Prolactin From Baseline at Week 16
Change in TSH and prolactin from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Hormone Level: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) and Prolactin From Baseline at Week 52
Change in TSH and prolactin from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Hormone Level: Free Thyroxine (Free T4) and Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) From Baseline at Week 16
Change in free T4 and ACTH from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Hormone Level: Free Thyroxine (Free T4) and Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) From Baseline at Week 52
Change in free T4 and ACTH from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Hormone Level: Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) and Cortisol From Baseline at Week 16
Change in IGF-1 and cortisol from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Hormone Level: Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) and Cortisol From Baseline at Week 52
Change in IGF-1 and cortisol from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Hormone Level: Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate (DHEAS) From Baseline at Week 16
Change in DHEAS from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Hormone Level: Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate (DHEAS) From Baseline at Week 52
Change in DHEAS from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Hormone Level: Luteinising Hormone (LH), Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) From Baseline at Week 16
Change in LH and FSH from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Hormone Level: Luteinising Hormone (LH), Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) From Baseline at Week 52
Change in LH and FSH from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Hormone Level: Estradiol (Females) From Baseline at Week 16
Change in estradiol (only for females) from baseline to week 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Hormone Level: Estradiol (Females) From Baseline at Week 52
Change in estradiol (only for females) from baseline to week 52 is presented.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Change in Hormone Level: Testosterone (Males) From Baseline at Week 16
Change in testosterone (only for males) from baseline to week 16 is presented. The testosterone analysis for Part B could not be performed due to an unforeseen change in the assay used by the central laboratory to measure testosterone during the trial. This change in methodology prevented a direct comparison of values measured at different time points during the trial.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Change in Hormone Level: Testosterone (Males) From Baseline at Week 52
Change in testosterone (only for males) from baseline to week 52 is presented. The testosterone analysis for Part B could not be performed due to an unforeseen change in the assay used by the central laboratory to measure testosterone during the trial. This change in methodology prevented a direct comparison of values measured at different time points during the trial.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Number of Participants With Change in Pubertal Status From Baseline at Week 16
This outcome measure presents "pubertal status results" which is based on Tanner staging recorded at baseline (week 0), week 16. Tanner Stages is a scale that defines physical measurements of development based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. It was used in this study to assess pubertal development with values ranging from Stage 1 (pre-pubertal characteristics) to Stage 5 (adult or mature characteristics). Results are presented for the following categories: 1) For female: breast development and pubic hair development, 2) For male: penis development and pubic hair development. Each category shows number of participants in stages 1 to 5, where stage 1 represents "early pubertal development" and stage 5 represents "pubertal development equivalent to that of an adult".
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Number of Participants With Change in Pubertal Status From Baseline at Week 52
This outcome measure presents "pubertal status results" which is based on Tanner staging recorded at baseline (week 0) and week 52. Tanner Stages is a scale that defines physical measurements of development based on external primary and secondary sex characteristics. It was used in this study to assess pubertal development with values ranging from Stage 1 (pre-pubertal characteristics) to Stage 5 (adult or mature characteristics). Results are presented for the following categories: 1) For female: breast development and pubic hair development, 2) For male: penis development and pubic hair development. Each category shows number of participants in stages 1 to 5, where stage 1 represents "early pubertal development" and stage 5 represents "pubertal development equivalent to that of an adult".
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Number of Participants With Change in Physical Examination From Baseline at Week 16
This outcome measure presents number of participants with physical examination findings, "normal; abnormal, not clinically significant (NCS) or abnormal, clinically significant (CS)" at baseline (week 0), week 16. These findings were categorised by the investigator. Results include examination of: general appearance; head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck; respiratory system; cardiovascular system (CVS); gastrointestinal (GI) system including mouth; musculoskeletal system; central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS); skin; thyroid gland and lymph node palpation.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Number of Participants With Change in Physical Examination From Baseline at Week 52
This outcome measure presents number of participants with physical examination findings, "normal; abnormal, not clinically significant (NCS) or abnormal, clinically significant (CS)" at baseline (week 0) and week 52. These findings were categorised by the investigator. Results include examination of: general appearance; head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck; respiratory system; cardiovascular system (CVS); gastrointestinal (GI) system including mouth; musculoskeletal system; central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS); skin; thyroid gland and lymph node palpation.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Height Velocity at Week 16
Height velocity was the change in height per year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and baseline divided by by time duration in days between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. Height velocity calculated at Weeks 16 is presented.
Measured: Week 16
Height Velocity at Week 52
Height velocity was the change in height per year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and baseline divided by by time duration in days between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. Height velocity calculated at Week 52 are presented.
Measured: week 52
Part A: Number of Participants With Change in Columbia Suicidality Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 16
C-SSRS (mapped to Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment [C-CASA]) is an interview-based rating scale to systematically assess suicidality, suicidal behaviour, suicidal ideation. Suicidality: emergence of any suicidal ideation or suicidal behaviour. Suicidal behaviour: when response is "yes" for any of the questions- actual attempt to suicide, engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behaviour, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, preparatory acts. Suicidal ideation: when response is "yes" for any of the questions- wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with methods without intent to act or some intent to act, without specific plan or with specific plan and intent to suicide. This outcome measure presents number of participants with "suicidal ideation or suicidal behaviour on C-SSRS" assessed at baseline (week 0), week 16. The questionnaire was not used in Part B due to the young age of the participants in Part B.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Part A: Number of Participants With Change in Columbia Suicidality Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Week 52
C-SSRS (mapped to Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment [C-CASA]) is an interview-based rating scale to systematically assess suicidality, suicidal behaviour, suicidal ideation. Suicidality: emergence of any suicidal ideation or suicidal behaviour. Suicidal behaviour: when response is "yes" for any of the questions- actual attempt to suicide, engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behaviour, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, preparatory acts. Suicidal ideation: when response is "yes" for any of the questions- wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with methods without intent to act or some intent to act, without specific plan or with specific plan and intent to suicide. This outcome measure presents number of participants with "suicidal ideation or suicidal behaviour on C-SSRS" assessed at baseline (week 0), week 52. The questionnaire was not used in Part B due to the young age of the participants in Part B.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Part A: Change in Patient Reported Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) From Baseline at Week 16
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) was evaluated from baseline (week 0) to weeks 16. The PHQ-9 questionnaire is a 9-item depression module included in the patient health questionnaire, a self-administered diagnostic tool used for assessment of mental disorders. The PHQ-9 total score ranges from 0-27; total scores of 1-4 represent no depression, total scores of 5-9 represent mild depression, total scores of 10-14 represent moderate depression, total scores of 15-19 represent moderately severe depression and total scores of 20-27 represent severe depression. The questionnaire was not used in Part B due to the young age of the participants in Part B.
Measured: Week 0, week 16
Part A: Change in Patient Reported Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) From Baseline at Week 52
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) was evaluated from baseline (week 0) to weeks 52. The PHQ-9 questionnaire is a 9-item depression module included in the patient health questionnaire, a self-administered diagnostic tool used for assessment of mental disorders. The PHQ-9 total score ranges from 0-27; total scores of 1-4 represent no depression, total scores of 5-9 represent mild depression, total scores of 10-14 represent moderate depression, total scores of 15-19 represent moderately severe depression and total scores of 20-27 represent severe depression. The questionnaire was not used in Part B due to the young age of the participants in Part B.
Measured: Week 0, week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Study start9 Nov 2015
- Primary completion4 Nov 2020
- Study completion19 Nov 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Metabolism and Nutrition DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novo Nordisk A/SThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novo Nordisk A/S
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02527200
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NN8022-4179
- Other IDs
- 2014-004415-37, U1111-1162-7884, NL54145.078.15, 2014
- Status last verified
- Jul 2023
- First submitted
- 17 Aug 2015
- Last updated
- 6 Jul 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: According to Novo Nordisk disclosure commitment on novonordisk-trials.com
Publications
Diene G, Angulo M, Hale PM, Jepsen CH, Hofman PL, Hokken-Koelega A, Ramesh C, Turan S, Tauber M. Liraglutide for Weight Management in Children and Adolescents With Prader-Willi Syndrome and Obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Dec 17;108(1):4-12. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac549.
PubMed 36181471
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jul 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Liraglutide for Weight Management in Paediatric Subjects With Prader-Willi Syndrome.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02527200
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NN8022-4179
- Conditions
- Metabolism and Nutrition Disorder, Obesity
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novo Nordisk A/SIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 9 Nov 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Nov 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 3 Feb 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This trial is conducted globally. The aim of this trial is to investigate the effect of liraglutide for weight management in paediatric subjects with Prader-Willi Syndrome.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide | Experimental | Drug: liraglutide |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Informed consent obtained before any trial-related activities. Trial-related activities are any procedures that are carried out as part of the trial, including activities to determine suitability for the trial
- Confirmed diagnosis of PWS (Prader-Willi Syndrome) (by genetic testing)
- Male or female, age at the time of signing informed consent: - Part A: above or equal to 12 years and less than 18 years
- Tanner stage 2-5 pubertal development for part A, and Tanner stage 1 for part B
- BMI (body mass index) corresponding to equal or above 30 kg/m^2 for adults by international cut-off points1 and equal or above the 95th percentile for age and sex (for diagnosis of obesity)
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM)
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)
- Calcitonin equal or above 50 ng/L
- No change in treatment plan with growth hormone (GH) from randomisation to the end of the open-label period patients on growth hormone to stay on, patients off GH to stay off during this period. Adjustments in doses of growth hormone will be permitted)
- Family or personal history of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2 (MEN2) or Medullary Thyroids Carcinoma (MTC)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| liraglutideInjected s.c./ subcutaneously (under the skin) This trial consists of a part A and a part B. Part A of the trial is conducted in obese adolescents with PWS. Part B of the trial is conducted in obese children with PWS. Entry into part A and part B of the trial will be sequential. | Drug | Liraglutide |
| placeboInjected s.c./ subcutaneously (under the skin) This trial consists of a part A and a part B. Part A of the trial is conducted in obese adolescents with PWS. Part B of the trial is conducted in obese children with PWS. Entry into part A and part B of the trial will be sequential. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS) From Baseline to 16 Weeks
Time frame: Week 0, Week 16
Change in BMI SDS from baseline to week 16 is presented. BMI SDS also called Z-scores, was calculated using the following formula: Z=[(y / M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), Box-cox power (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents', y= individual BMI. BMI provided for each sex and age. For each participant, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. Possible values range from -3 to +3, a negative score being beneficial.
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS) From Baseline to 52 Weeks
Time frame: Week 0, Week 52
Change in BMI SDS from baseline to week 52 is presented. BMI SDS also called Z-scores, was calculated using the following formula: Z=[(y / M)^L - 1] / S*L; where L, M and S are median (M), Box-cox power (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents', y= individual BMI. BMI provided for each sex and age. For each participant, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. Possible values range from -3 to +3, a negative score being beneficial.
104 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 5% Reduction in Baseline BMI at Week 16
Time frame: At week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 5% Reduction in Baseline BMI at Week 52
Time frame: At week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 10% Reduction in Baseline BMI at Week 16
Time frame: At week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 10% Reduction in Baseline BMI at Week 52
Time frame: At week 52
Percentage of Participants With no Increase in BMI SDS at Week 16
Time frame: At week 16
Percentage of Participants With no Increase in BMI SDS at Week 52
Time frame: At week 52
Change in BMI From Baseline at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0, week 16
Change in BMI From Baseline at Week 52
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in Body Weight (Kilogram (kg)) From Baseline at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0, week 16
Change in Body Weight (kg) From Baseline at Week 52
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in Body Weight (Pounds (lb)) From Baseline at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0, week 16
Change in Body Weight (lb) From Baseline at Week 52
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in Body Weight (Percentage [%]) From Baseline at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0, week 16
Change in Body Weight (%) From Baseline at Week 52
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in Waist Circumference From Baseline at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0, week 16
Change in Waist Circumference From Baseline at Week 52
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in Waist-to-hip Circumference Ratio From Baseline at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0, week 16
Change in Waist-to-hip Circumference Ratio From Baseline at Week 52
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in Hyperphagia Score: Total Score and Hyperphagic Behaviour, Drive and Severity Score From Baseline at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0, week 16
Change in Hyperphagia Score: Total Score and Hyperphagic Behaviour, Drive and Severity Score From Baseline at Week 52
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in High Sensitivity C Reactive Protein (hsCRP) From Baseline at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0, week 16
Change in High Sensitivity C Reactive Protein (hsCRP) From Baseline at Week 52
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0, week 16
Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline at Week 52
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL)-Cholesterol From Baseline at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0, week 16
Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL)-Cholesterol From Baseline at Week 52
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL)-Cholesterol From Baseline at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0, week 16
Change in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL)-Cholesterol From Baseline at Week 52
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in Non-high Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL) Cholesterol From Baseline at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0, week 16
Change in Non-high Density Lipoprotein (Non-HDL) Cholesterol From Baseline at Week 52
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in Very Low-density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol From Baseline at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0, week 16
Change in Very Low-density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol From Baseline at Week 52
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in Triglycerides From Baseline at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0, week 16
Change in Triglycerides From Baseline at Week 52
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in Fasting Lipid: Free Fatty Acids (FFA) From Baseline at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0, week 16
Change in Fasting Lipid: Free Fatty Acids (FFA) From Baseline at Week 52
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0, week 16
Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline at Week 52
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline at Week 16
Time frame: Week 0, week 16
Change in HbA1c From Baseline at Week 52
Time frame: Week 0, week 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jul 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 36181471Diene G, Angulo M, Hale PM, Jepsen CH, Hofman PL, Hokken-Koelega A, Ramesh C, Turan S, Tauber M. Liraglutide for Weight Management in Children and Adolescents With Prader-Willi Syndrome and Obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Dec 17;108(1):4-12. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac549.
- Clinical Trials at Novo NordiskLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. According to Novo Nordisk disclosure commitment on novonordisk-trials.com
Related trials for Metabolism and Nutrition Disorder
RecruitingObservational study
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) Prospective Trial for Obesity (EGO-Trial)
Obesity
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Sequential Therapy With Mexidol® (Intravenous) and Mexidol® FORTE 250 (Oral) on Functional Brain Activity Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biochemical Parameters in Patients With Chronic Cerebral Ischemia: A Comparison of Patients With and Without Metabolic Disorders
Metabolic Abnormalities, Obesity & Overweight
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A First-in-human Study of KK8123 in Adults With X-linked Hypophosphatemia
X-linked Hypophosphatemia
Recruiting
Exercise Training and Vitamin D Metabolism
Obesity & Overweight, Vitamin D
Recruiting
Metabolic Health, Bones and Nuts During Weight Loss in Adults
Weight Loss, Bone Density
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
32 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing liraglutide in people with Metabolism and Nutrition Disorder and Obesity, run by Novo Nordisk A/S at 32 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 32 sites in France, United States, Turkey (Türkiye), Italy, Australia and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Feb 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS) From Baseline to 16 Weeks (time frame: Week 0, Week 16). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02527200, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jul 2023.