Physical ActivityBEFITNCT02531763
Behavioral Economics Framingham Incentive Trial (BE FIT)
A study testing Social incentive intervention in people with Physical Activity, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
Trial summary
BE FIT (Behavioral Economics Framingham Incentive Trial) is a pilot study to test the deployment of a social incentive intervention using the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) Offspring, Generation 3, and Omni cohorts to increase physical activity (PA). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Physical Activity
- What is being tested?
- Social incentive intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 206 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Sep 2015to Aug 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- FHS study members from any of the existing cohorts (Offspring, Gen 3, Omni groups 1)
- Must have active email address
- Must have participated in the FHS Digital Connectedness Survey
- Must have at least 2 family members in the FHS
Who cannot join
- Not currently participating in any other physical activity studies.
- Not told by a physician not to exercise.
- Not currently pregnant.
- Not had at least one fall with significant injury in the past year.
- Not had any surgical procedures in the participants' legs that would prohibit physical activity.
- Not have any other medical conditions or other reasons to prevent participation in a 6 month physical activity program.
About this study
Official title: Behavioral Economics Framingham Incentive Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial
BE FIT (Behavioral Economics Framingham Incentive Trial) is a pilot study to test the deployment of a social incentive intervention using the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) Offspring, Generation 3, and Omni cohorts to increase physical activity (PA). The investigators will leverage the strength of FHS by recruiting trios and nuclear families to test whether social connectedness increases PA. The investigators will utilize a randomized controlled trial design. The investigators will test a social incentive intervention strategy using a team-based design in which participants work together to jointly achieve their PA goals, and a social connectedness intervention.
Read the detailed description
Physical inactivity is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, including obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, and an increased risk for CVD and death. In the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) Third Generation (Gen 3) and multiethnic Omni 2 cohort participants, objectively measured accelerometry physical activity (PA) data showed that moderate to vigorous PA was associated with healthier CVD risk factor profiles.6 Despite the health benefits of engaging in PA, only about half of FHS participants are achieving U.S. recommended aerobic PA guidelines, consistent with the low rates observed in adults nationally. Experts estimate that increasing PA by only 10% would annually save ½ million lives worldwide.
There has been a lot of interest in using "social" or team-based designs to increase PA. Prior evaluations of the FHS found that rates of smoking and obesity were associated with social connectedness within social networks. Evidence from other industries has found that interventions using social comparisons feedback to change electricity use were effective, but only if paired with appropriate social approval or disapproval. PA interventions could leverage such social incentives to design interventions that increase peer support, accountability, and unity towards a common goal. In five pilot studies conducted in 2014 at the University of Pennsylvania, the investigators have found that different incentive and feedback designs resulted in differential effectiveness. These preliminary data support the notion that careful testing of alternative social incentive combinations are important to conduct before deciding which intervention to scale more broadly.
The rapidly expanding availability of mobile technologies provides a resource effective way to implement social incentive interventions to improve health. Many types of health devices (e.g. glucometers, pedometers) provide individual feedback on performance (e.g. blood sugar or step count). With wireless devices it is technologically feasible to provide relative feedback at periodic intervals. However, utilizing mobile health (mHealth) devices is rarely done and could represent a significant opportunity to improve health behavior at low cost. For our study, the investigators will leverage the University of Pennsylvania's NIH-funded Way to Health infrastructure. The platform incorporates automated inputs from wireless devices to capture behavior and deliver automated feedback to participants. While conducting the 5 pilot studies noted above, the investigators found that most smartphones and wearable devices were accurate for tracking physical activity data.
The investigators are conducting a pilot study and leveraging information acquired through our Digital Connectedness Survey to test the deployment of a social incentive intervention using the FHS Offspring, Generation 3, and Omni cohorts to increase PA. The investigators will leverage the strength of FHS by recruiting trios and nuclear families to test whether social connectedness increases PA. The investigators will utilize a randomized controlled trial design. The investigators will test a social incentive intervention strategy using a team-based design in which participants work together to jointly achieve their PA goals, and a social connectedness intervention. The primary outcome of the intervention pilot study will be the proportion of individual participant-days that the goal is achieved over a 12-week intervention period. Individuals find PA maintenance challenging and PA sustainability has not been studied systematically. As a secondary aim of the intervention study, the investigators will examine PA goal achievement durability for 12 weeks after the intervention ends.
Specific Aims:
Aim 1. To test the feasibility of using a team-based social incentive intervention to increase PA in FHS participants. H1: The demographic and clinical characteristics of individuals who agrees to be randomized are younger and healthier than those who do not agree to participate. H2: FHS participants who elect the Fitbit in place of the Moves app will differ based on demographic and clinical characteristics.
Aim 2. To evaluate the effectiveness of a team-based social incentive intervention to achieve PA goals among connected individuals on a team compared to a control group of individuals. H4: A team-based social incentive intervention comprised of connected individuals on a team is more effective for achieving PA goals than a control group of individuals.
Secondary Aim. To evaluate whether differences in achieving PA goals between study arms during the 12-week intervention are sustained during the 12-week follow-up period. H6: PA levels in the 12-week follow-up will decline for all arms but remain different in a similar fashion to that during the intervention period.
This study has the potential to address the major public health problem of sedentary lifestyle, with its consequent increased risks of obesity and CVD risk factor progression. The investigators bring together a multi-disciplinary team with expertise in PA, CVD epidemiology, biostatistics, and behavioral economics. The investigators propose an innovative linking of a classical randomized clinical trial (RCT) design with the many strengths of the epidemiological FHS. This pilot RCT will examine the effectiveness of different approaches to leveraging social incentives to improve health behaviors, an area with considerable promise for increasing the effectiveness of a variety of health interventions. Ultimately the goal is to leverage this pilot study to implement a larger study in the FHS. The investigators also anticipate ultimately linking these results with the extant FHS genetics databases.
- Conditions
- Physical Activity
- Being tested
- Social incentive intervention
- Keywords
- mHealth, behavioral economics, social incentives
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Social incentive interventionBehavioural
Participant sign a pre-commitment pledge to try to achieve their goal. They are entered into a game with their teammate in which they have the chance to earn points and advance through levels (bronze, silver, gold, platinum). At the end, those in gold or platinum will receive a coffee mug as a reward
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | FHS participants who enrolled with family member will not receive the social incentive intervention and will participate individually but will set a daily step goal and receive daily feedback on whether he or she achieved the goal or not. |
| Intervention | Active comparator | FHS participants who enrolled with a family member will be placed on a team as connected individuals (both in the same family) who will set a daily step goal, receive daily feedback on whether they achieved their goal, and receive the social incentive intervention. Receives: Behavioral: Social incentive intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
proportion of days achieving their step goals over intervention period.
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Mean daily steps adjusted for baseline step count
Measured: Weeks 1 to 12, and weeks 13 to 24
Proportion participant-days achieving step goals
Measured: Weeks 13 to 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2015
- Primary completionMay 2016
- Study completionAug 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Physical ActivityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 206 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Boston University, University of Pennsylvania
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Caroline S Fox, MD MPH, Principal investigator, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02531763
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1ZIAHL006094-05
- Other IDs
- HHSN268201500056P
- Acronym
- BEFIT
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 19 Aug 2015
- Last updated
- 30 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Patel MS, Benjamin EJ, Volpp KG, Fox CS, Small DS, Massaro JM, Lee JJ, Hilbert V, Valentino M, Taylor DH, Manders ES, Mutalik K, Zhu J, Wang W, Murabito JM. Effect of a Game-Based Intervention Designed to Enhance Social Incentives to Increase Physical Activity Among Families: The BE FIT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Nov 1;177(11):1586-1593. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.3458.
PubMed 28973115
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Behavioral Economics Framingham Incentive Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02531763
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BEFIT / 1ZIAHL006094-05
- Conditions
- Physical Activity
- Keywords
- mHealth, behavioral economics, social incentives
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 206 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Boston University, University of Pennsylvania
- Study start
- Sep 2015
- Primary completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
BE FIT (Behavioral Economics Framingham Incentive Trial) is a pilot study to test the deployment of a social incentive intervention using the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) Offspring, Generation 3, and Omni cohorts to increase physical activity (PA). The investigators will leverage the strength of FHS by recruiting trios and nuclear families to test whether social connectedness increases PA. The investigators will utilize a randomized controlled trial design. The investigators will test a social incentive intervention strategy using a team-based design in which participants work together to jointly achieve their PA goals, and a social connectedness intervention.
Detailed description
Physical inactivity is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, including obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, and an increased risk for CVD and death. In the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) Third Generation (Gen 3) and multiethnic Omni 2 cohort participants, objectively measured accelerometry physical activity (PA) data showed that moderate to vigorous PA was associated with healthier CVD risk factor profiles.6 Despite the health benefits of engaging in PA, only about half of FHS participants are achieving U.S. recommended aerobic PA guidelines, consistent with the low rates observed in adults nationally. Experts estimate that increasing PA by only 10% would annually save ½ million lives worldwide.
There has been a lot of interest in using "social" or team-based designs to increase PA. Prior evaluations of the FHS found that rates of smoking and obesity were associated with social connectedness within social networks. Evidence from other industries has found that interventions using social comparisons feedback to change electricity use were effective, but only if paired with appropriate social approval or disapproval. PA interventions could leverage such social incentives to design interventions that increase peer support, accountability, and unity towards a common goal. In five pilot studies conducted in 2014 at the University of Pennsylvania, the investigators have found that different incentive and feedback designs resulted in differential effectiveness. These preliminary data support the notion that careful testing of alternative social incentive combinations are important to conduct before deciding which intervention to scale more broadly.
The rapidly expanding availability of mobile technologies provides a resource effective way to implement social incentive interventions to improve health. Many types of health devices (e.g. glucometers, pedometers) provide individual feedback on performance (e.g. blood sugar or step count). With wireless devices it is technologically feasible to provide relative feedback at periodic intervals. However, utilizing mobile health (mHealth) devices is rarely done and could represent a significant opportunity to improve health behavior at low cost. For our study, the investigators will leverage the University of Pennsylvania's NIH-funded Way to Health infrastructure. The platform incorporates automated inputs from wireless devices to capture behavior and deliver automated feedback to participants. While conducting the 5 pilot studies noted above, the investigators found that most smartphones and wearable devices were accurate for tracking physical activity data.
The investigators are conducting a pilot study and leveraging information acquired through our Digital Connectedness Survey to test the deployment of a social incentive intervention using the FHS Offspring, Generation 3, and Omni cohorts to increase PA. The investigators will leverage the strength of FHS by recruiting trios and nuclear families to test whether social connectedness increases PA. The investigators will utilize a randomized controlled trial design. The investigators will test a social incentive intervention strategy using a team-based design in which participants work together to jointly achieve their PA goals, and a social connectedness intervention. The primary outcome of the intervention pilot study will be the proportion of individual participant-days that the goal is achieved over a 12-week intervention period. Individuals find PA maintenance challenging and PA sustainability has not been studied systematically. As a secondary aim of the intervention study, the investigators will examine PA goal achievement durability for 12 weeks after the intervention ends.
Specific Aims:
Aim 1. To test the feasibility of using a team-based social incentive intervention to increase PA in FHS participants. H1: The demographic and clinical characteristics of individuals who agrees to be randomized are younger and healthier than those who do not agree to participate. H2: FHS participants who elect the Fitbit in place of the Moves app will differ based on demographic and clinical characteristics.
Aim 2. To evaluate the effectiveness of a team-based social incentive intervention to achieve PA goals among connected individuals on a team compared to a control group of individuals. H4: A team-based social incentive intervention comprised of connected individuals on a team is more effective for achieving PA goals than a control group of individuals.
Secondary Aim. To evaluate whether differences in achieving PA goals between study arms during the 12-week intervention are sustained during the 12-week follow-up period. H6: PA levels in the 12-week follow-up will decline for all arms but remain different in a similar fashion to that during the intervention period.
This study has the potential to address the major public health problem of sedentary lifestyle, with its consequent increased risks of obesity and CVD risk factor progression. The investigators bring together a multi-disciplinary team with expertise in PA, CVD epidemiology, biostatistics, and behavioral economics. The investigators propose an innovative linking of a classical randomized clinical trial (RCT) design with the many strengths of the epidemiological FHS. This pilot RCT will examine the effectiveness of different approaches to leveraging social incentives to improve health behaviors, an area with considerable promise for increasing the effectiveness of a variety of health interventions. Ultimately the goal is to leverage this pilot study to implement a larger study in the FHS. The investigators also anticipate ultimately linking these results with the extant FHS genetics databases.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –FHS participants who enrolled with family member will not receive the social incentive intervention and will participate individually but will set a daily step goal and receive daily feedback on whether he or she achieved the goal or not. |
| Intervention | Active comparator | Behavioral: Social incentive interventionFHS participants who enrolled with a family member will be placed on a team as connected individuals (both in the same family) who will set a daily step goal, receive daily feedback on whether they achieved their goal, and receive the social incentive intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- FHS study members from any of the existing cohorts (Offspring, Gen 3, Omni groups 1)
- Must have active email address
- Must have participated in the FHS Digital Connectedness Survey
- Must have at least 2 family members in the FHS
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Not currently participating in any other physical activity studies.
- Not told by a physician not to exercise.
- Not currently pregnant.
- Not had at least one fall with significant injury in the past year.
- Not had any surgical procedures in the participants' legs that would prohibit physical activity.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Social incentive interventionParticipant sign a pre-commitment pledge to try to achieve their goal. They are entered into a game with their teammate in which they have the chance to earn points and advance through levels (bronze, silver, gold, platinum). At the end, those in gold or platinum will receive a coffee mug as a reward | Behavioural | Intervention |
Primary outcome
proportion of days achieving their step goals over intervention period.
Time frame: 12 weeks
2 secondary outcomes
Mean daily steps adjusted for baseline step count
Time frame: Weeks 1 to 12, and weeks 13 to 24
Proportion participant-days achieving step goals
Time frame: Weeks 13 to 24
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Aug 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28973115Patel MS, Benjamin EJ, Volpp KG, Fox CS, Small DS, Massaro JM, Lee JJ, Hilbert V, Valentino M, Taylor DH, Manders ES, Mutalik K, Zhu J, Wang W, Murabito JM. Effect of a Game-Based Intervention Designed to Enhance Social Incentives to Increase Physical Activity Among Families: The BE FIT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Nov 1;177(11):1586-1593. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.3458.
Related trials for Physical Activity
Enrolling by invitation
Exercise Intervention for Breast Cancer Patients With Sarcopenia
Sarcopenia, Breast Cancer
Recruiting
Effect of a Fermented Dairy Protein With Prebiotic Fiber on GI Complaints
Digestive Health, Quality of Life
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
Long-term Efficacy and Safety Extension (LTE) Study of Barzolvolimab in Participants With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
Recruiting
Regulated Stimulation for Optimized Network Activity and Therapeutic Equilibrium
Major Depressive Disorder
Recruiting
The Effectiveness of Structured Swallowing Exercise Therapy in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: An Assessment of Swallowing Function and Quality of Life
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Caroline S Fox, MD MPH principal investigator
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Social incentive intervention in people with Physical Activity, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
proportion of days achieving their step goals over intervention period. (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02531763, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Aug 2016.