AzTrials
AzTrials

Physical ActivityBEFITNCT02531763

Behavioral Economics Framingham Incentive Trial (BE FIT)

A study testing Social incentive intervention in people with Physical Activity, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

BE FIT (Behavioral Economics Framingham Incentive Trial) is a pilot study to test the deployment of a social incentive intervention using the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) Offspring, Generation 3, and Omni cohorts to increase physical activity (PA). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Physical Activity
What is being tested?
Social incentive intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
206 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Sep 2015to Aug 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • FHS study members from any of the existing cohorts (Offspring, Gen 3, Omni groups 1)
  • Must have active email address
  • Must have participated in the FHS Digital Connectedness Survey
  • Must have at least 2 family members in the FHS

Who cannot join

  • Not currently participating in any other physical activity studies.
  • Not told by a physician not to exercise.
  • Not currently pregnant.
  • Not had at least one fall with significant injury in the past year.
  • Not had any surgical procedures in the participants' legs that would prohibit physical activity.
  • Not have any other medical conditions or other reasons to prevent participation in a 6 month physical activity program.

About this study

Official title: Behavioral Economics Framingham Incentive Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BE FIT (Behavioral Economics Framingham Incentive Trial) is a pilot study to test the deployment of a social incentive intervention using the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) Offspring, Generation 3, and Omni cohorts to increase physical activity (PA). The investigators will leverage the strength of FHS by recruiting trios and nuclear families to test whether social connectedness increases PA. The investigators will utilize a randomized controlled trial design. The investigators will test a social incentive intervention strategy using a team-based design in which participants work together to jointly achieve their PA goals, and a social connectedness intervention.

Read the detailed description

Physical inactivity is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, including obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, and an increased risk for CVD and death. In the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) Third Generation (Gen 3) and multiethnic Omni 2 cohort participants, objectively measured accelerometry physical activity (PA) data showed that moderate to vigorous PA was associated with healthier CVD risk factor profiles.6 Despite the health benefits of engaging in PA, only about half of FHS participants are achieving U.S. recommended aerobic PA guidelines, consistent with the low rates observed in adults nationally. Experts estimate that increasing PA by only 10% would annually save ½ million lives worldwide.

There has been a lot of interest in using "social" or team-based designs to increase PA. Prior evaluations of the FHS found that rates of smoking and obesity were associated with social connectedness within social networks. Evidence from other industries has found that interventions using social comparisons feedback to change electricity use were effective, but only if paired with appropriate social approval or disapproval. PA interventions could leverage such social incentives to design interventions that increase peer support, accountability, and unity towards a common goal. In five pilot studies conducted in 2014 at the University of Pennsylvania, the investigators have found that different incentive and feedback designs resulted in differential effectiveness. These preliminary data support the notion that careful testing of alternative social incentive combinations are important to conduct before deciding which intervention to scale more broadly.

The rapidly expanding availability of mobile technologies provides a resource effective way to implement social incentive interventions to improve health. Many types of health devices (e.g. glucometers, pedometers) provide individual feedback on performance (e.g. blood sugar or step count). With wireless devices it is technologically feasible to provide relative feedback at periodic intervals. However, utilizing mobile health (mHealth) devices is rarely done and could represent a significant opportunity to improve health behavior at low cost. For our study, the investigators will leverage the University of Pennsylvania's NIH-funded Way to Health infrastructure. The platform incorporates automated inputs from wireless devices to capture behavior and deliver automated feedback to participants. While conducting the 5 pilot studies noted above, the investigators found that most smartphones and wearable devices were accurate for tracking physical activity data.

The investigators are conducting a pilot study and leveraging information acquired through our Digital Connectedness Survey to test the deployment of a social incentive intervention using the FHS Offspring, Generation 3, and Omni cohorts to increase PA. The investigators will leverage the strength of FHS by recruiting trios and nuclear families to test whether social connectedness increases PA. The investigators will utilize a randomized controlled trial design. The investigators will test a social incentive intervention strategy using a team-based design in which participants work together to jointly achieve their PA goals, and a social connectedness intervention. The primary outcome of the intervention pilot study will be the proportion of individual participant-days that the goal is achieved over a 12-week intervention period. Individuals find PA maintenance challenging and PA sustainability has not been studied systematically. As a secondary aim of the intervention study, the investigators will examine PA goal achievement durability for 12 weeks after the intervention ends.

Specific Aims:

Aim 1. To test the feasibility of using a team-based social incentive intervention to increase PA in FHS participants. H1: The demographic and clinical characteristics of individuals who agrees to be randomized are younger and healthier than those who do not agree to participate. H2: FHS participants who elect the Fitbit in place of the Moves app will differ based on demographic and clinical characteristics.

Aim 2. To evaluate the effectiveness of a team-based social incentive intervention to achieve PA goals among connected individuals on a team compared to a control group of individuals. H4: A team-based social incentive intervention comprised of connected individuals on a team is more effective for achieving PA goals than a control group of individuals.

Secondary Aim. To evaluate whether differences in achieving PA goals between study arms during the 12-week intervention are sustained during the 12-week follow-up period. H6: PA levels in the 12-week follow-up will decline for all arms but remain different in a similar fashion to that during the intervention period.

This study has the potential to address the major public health problem of sedentary lifestyle, with its consequent increased risks of obesity and CVD risk factor progression. The investigators bring together a multi-disciplinary team with expertise in PA, CVD epidemiology, biostatistics, and behavioral economics. The investigators propose an innovative linking of a classical randomized clinical trial (RCT) design with the many strengths of the epidemiological FHS. This pilot RCT will examine the effectiveness of different approaches to leveraging social incentives to improve health behaviors, an area with considerable promise for increasing the effectiveness of a variety of health interventions. Ultimately the goal is to leverage this pilot study to implement a larger study in the FHS. The investigators also anticipate ultimately linking these results with the extant FHS genetics databases.

Being tested
Social incentive intervention
Keywords
mHealth, behavioral economics, social incentives
Medical subject headings
Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Social incentive interventionBehavioural

    Participant sign a pre-commitment pledge to try to achieve their goal. They are entered into a game with their teammate in which they have the chance to earn points and advance through levels (bronze, silver, gold, platinum). At the end, those in gold or platinum will receive a coffee mug as a reward

Study groups in NCT02531763
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlNo interventionFHS participants who enrolled with family member will not receive the social incentive intervention and will participate individually but will set a daily step goal and receive daily feedback on whether he or she achieved the goal or not.
InterventionActive comparatorFHS participants who enrolled with a family member will be placed on a team as connected individuals (both in the same family) who will set a daily step goal, receive daily feedback on whether they achieved their goal, and receive the social incentive intervention.
Receives: Behavioral: Social incentive intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. proportion of days achieving their step goals over intervention period.

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Mean daily steps adjusted for baseline step count

    Measured: Weeks 1 to 12, and weeks 13 to 24

  2. Proportion participant-days achieving step goals

    Measured: Weeks 13 to 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Aug 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2015
  3. Primary completionMay 2016
  4. Study completionAug 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
206 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02531763
Sponsor's protocol ID
1ZIAHL006094-05
Other IDs
HHSN268201500056P
Acronym
BEFIT
Status last verified
Aug 2016
First submitted
19 Aug 2015
Last updated
30 Aug 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Patel MS, Benjamin EJ, Volpp KG, Fox CS, Small DS, Massaro JM, Lee JJ, Hilbert V, Valentino M, Taylor DH, Manders ES, Mutalik K, Zhu J, Wang W, Murabito JM. Effect of a Game-Based Intervention Designed to Enhance Social Incentives to Increase Physical Activity Among Families: The BE FIT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Nov 1;177(11):1586-1593. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.3458.

    PubMed 28973115

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Social incentive intervention in people with Physical Activity, run by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

proportion of days achieving their step goals over intervention period. (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02531763, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Aug 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in