Huntington DiseaseHD-DBSNCT02535884
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the Globus Pallidus (GP) in Huntington's Disease (HD)
A study testing ACTIVA® PC neurostimulator (Model 37601) in people with Huntington Disease, run by Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf at 12 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to prove the efficacy and safety of pallidal DBS in HD patients and to show superiority of DBS on motor function in the stimulation group compared to stimulation-off group Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Huntington Disease
- What is being tested?
- ACTIVA® PC neurostimulator (Model 37601)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 48 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2014to 31 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinically symptomatic and genetically confirmed HD (number of CAG repeats ≥ 36)
- Age ≥18 years
- Moderate stage of the disease (UHDRS motor score ≥ 30)
- Chorea despite best medical treatment (UHDRS chorea subscore ≥ 10)
- Mattis Dementia Rating Scale ≥ 120 (or > 80% of items testable independently from motor impairment)
- Patient has stable medication prior six weeks before inclusion
- Signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- Juvenile HD (Westphal variant) or predominant bradykinesia
- Postural instability with UHDRS retropulsion score > 2
- Severe comorbidity compromising operability and/or life expectancy and/or quality of life during the trial duration (e.g. cancer with life expectancy < 6 months, NYHA 3 and 4 rising the anaesthetic risk according to the anaesthesiologist)
- Acute suicidality
- Acute psychosis (symptoms within previous 6 months)
- Participation in any interventional clinical trial within 2 months before screening
Show all 11Show fewer
- Cortical atrophy grade 3
- Patients with risk of coagulopathies and/or increased risk of haemorrhage
- Patients with an implanted pacemaker or defibrillator
- Pregnancy
- lactation
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 4 countries.
12 sites in 4 countries
Germany7 sites
Charité Campus Virchow Klinikum
Berlin, 13353
University hospital Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf, 40225
University Hospital Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
Kiel, 24105
Universität zu Lübeck
Lübeck, 23562
University hospital Munich LMU
Munich, 80336
kbo-Isar-Amper-Clinic Taufkirchen
Taufkirchen, 84416
France2 sites
CHU Amiens Hôpital nord, Department of neurosurgery and Department of neurology
Amiens, 80054
Hôpital Roger Salengro, Service de Neurologie et Pathologie du mouvement
Lille, 59037
Switzerland2 sites
Center for Neurology
Bern, Gümlingen, 3073
Inselspital, Department of Neurology
Bern, 3010
About this study
Official title: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the Globus Pallidus (GP) in Huntington's Disease (HD): A Prospective, Randomised, Controlled, International, Multi-centre Study
The aim of the study is to prove the efficacy and safety of pallidal DBS in HD patients and to show superiority of DBS on motor function in the stimulation group compared to stimulation-off group
Read the detailed description
In this study the efficacy and safety of pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in HD patients shall be investigated and superiority of DBS on motor function in the stimulation group compared to the stimulation-off group shall be shown. This study is a prospective, randomised, double blind, parallel group, sham-controlled, multi-centre trial. Patients in the stimulation group will be stimulated for three months while the stimulator in the sham-group will be turned off for three months. After three months the primary endpoint will be assessed. Afterwards the stimulator will be turned on in all patients.
- Conditions
- Huntington Disease
- Being tested
- ACTIVA® PC neurostimulator (Model 37601)
- Keywords
- Huntington Disease, DBS, Chorea
- Medical subject headings
- Huntington Disease, Chorea
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ACTIVA® PC neurostimulator (Model 37601)Device
the stimulator in the stimulation group will be turned on after implantation of the device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Stimulation group | Experimental | Patients in the stimulation group will be stimulated immediately after implantation of the Stimulator (ACTIVA® PC neurostimulator (Model 37601)) Receives: Device: ACTIVA® PC neurostimulator (Model 37601) |
| Non-stimulation group | Sham comparator | Patients in the non-stimulation group will not be stimulated for the first three months after implantation of the Stimulator (ACTIVA® PC neurostimulator (Model 37601)) Receives: Device: ACTIVA® PC neurostimulator (Model 37601) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
UHDRS-TMS difference
Difference between the groups in the UHDRS total motor score (UHDRS-TMS) at 12 weeks postoperatively compared to baseline.
Measured: 12 weeks postoperatively compared to baseline
Secondary outcomes (12)
UHDRS-Chorea difference
Difference in the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) chorea subscore (items 14-20)
Measured: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
UHDRS-bradykinesia difference
Difference in the UHDRS bradykinesia subscore (items 22-25 and 27-29)
Measured: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
BFMDRS difference
Difference in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) motor score
Measured: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
Reilmann Battery differences
Difference in the Q-Motor "choreomotography" test (Reilmann Battery)
Measured: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
MDRS difference
Difference in the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS)
Measured: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
Verbal Fluency Test difference
Difference in the Verbal Fluency Test (formal lexical, categorical, category change)
Measured: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
SDMT difference
Difference in the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
Measured: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
STROOP Test differences
Difference in STROOP word reading, colour naming and colour of the word naming
Measured: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
HADS-SIS difference
Difference in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale combined with Snaith Irritability Scale (HADS-SIS)
Measured: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
PBA-s difference
Difference in the Problem Behaviours Assessment Short Form (PBA-s)
Measured: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
SF 36 difference
Difference in the Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)
Measured: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
CGI difference
Difference in the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI)
Measured: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2014
- Primary completion31 Dec 2021
- Study completion31 Dec 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Huntington DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Heinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- During the first 3 month the one group will be stimulated (pallidal DBS), thereafter 12 weeks open follow up, where patients in both groups are stimulated.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- KKS Netzwerk, Medtronic, The George Institute, Egyptian Society of Neurological Surgeons, CHDI Foundation, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jan Vesper, Prof Dr., Study chair, Dept. of Functional Neurosurgery and StereotaxyAlfons Schnitzler, Prof Dr, Principal investigator, Dept.of Neurology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02535884
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KKS-198
- Other IDs
- DRKS00006785
- Acronym
- HD-DBS
- Status last verified
- Jan 2022
- First submitted
- 27 Aug 2015
- Last updated
- 21 Jan 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: After the study the data will be provided to the CHDI. The Foundation may use, and make available for use by the Foundation Collaborators, the Study Data for the following purposes: (A) to design and guide future research studies and clinical trials and (B) to support and enable the following scientific discussion and research: (1) to better understand HD or other diseases being studied, (2) that furthers the development of treatments for HD or other diseases or (3) that furthers biomedical research.
Publications
Moro E, Lang AE, Strafella AP, Poon YY, Arango PM, Dagher A, Hutchison WD, Lozano AM. Bilateral globus pallidus stimulation for Huntington's disease. Ann Neurol. 2004 Aug;56(2):290-4. doi: 10.1002/ana.20183.
PubMed 15293283Groiss SJ WL, Suedmeyer, M, Ploner M, Reck C, Voges J, SturmV, Timmermann L, Schnitzler A. Effect of bilateral pallidal deep brain stimulation in Huntington's disease: A case report. Mov Disord, Volume 21, Issue S15. Tenth International Congress of Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders. Kyoto 2006.
Fasano A, Cadeddu F, Guidubaldi A, Piano C, Soleti F, Zinzi P, Bentivoglio AR. The long-term effect of tetrabenazine in the management of Huntington disease. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2008 Nov-Dec;31(6):313-8. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0b013e318166da60.
PubMed 19050408Wojtecki L, Groiss SJ, Ferrea S, Elben S, Hartmann CJ, Dunnett SB, Rosser A, Saft C, Sudmeyer M, Ohmann C, Schnitzler A, Vesper J; Surgical Approaches Working Group of the European Huntington's Disease Network (EHDN). A Prospective Pilot Trial for Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation in Huntington's Disease. Front Neurol. 2015 Aug 18;6:177. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00177. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26347707Wojtecki L, Groiss SJ, Hartmann CJ, Elben S, Omlor S, Schnitzler A, Vesper J. Deep Brain Stimulation in Huntington's Disease-Preliminary Evidence on Pathophysiology, Efficacy and Safety. Brain Sci. 2016 Aug 30;6(3):38. doi: 10.3390/brainsci6030038.
PubMed 27589813Kinfe T, Del Vecchio A, Nussel M, Zhao Y, Stadlbauer A, Buchfelder M. Deep brain stimulation and stereotactic-assisted brain graft injection targeting fronto-striatal circuits for Huntington's disease: an update. Expert Rev Neurother. 2022 Sep;22(9):781-788. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2022.2091988. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
PubMed 35766355Rodrigues FB, Ferreira JJ, Wild EJ. Huntington's Disease Clinical Trials Corner: June 2019. J Huntingtons Dis. 2019;8(3):363-371. doi: 10.3233/JHD-199003.
PubMed 31381524Hartmann CJ, Groiss SJ, Vesper J, Schnitzler A, Wojtecki L. Brain stimulation in Huntington's disease. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2016 Jun;6(3):223-36. doi: 10.2217/nmt-2016-0007. Epub 2016 May 27.
PubMed 27230813
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jan 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the Globus Pallidus (GP) in Huntington's Disease (HD): A Prospective, Randomised, Controlled, International, Multi-centre Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02535884
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HD-DBS / KKS-198
- Conditions
- Huntington Disease
- Keywords
- Huntington Disease, DBS, Chorea
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Heinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- KKS Netzwerk, Medtronic, The George Institute, Egyptian Society of Neurological Surgeons, CHDI Foundation, Inc.
- Study start
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to prove the efficacy and safety of pallidal DBS in HD patients and to show superiority of DBS on motor function in the stimulation group compared to stimulation-off group
Detailed description
In this study the efficacy and safety of pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in HD patients shall be investigated and superiority of DBS on motor function in the stimulation group compared to the stimulation-off group shall be shown. This study is a prospective, randomised, double blind, parallel group, sham-controlled, multi-centre trial. Patients in the stimulation group will be stimulated for three months while the stimulator in the sham-group will be turned off for three months. After three months the primary endpoint will be assessed. Afterwards the stimulator will be turned on in all patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- During the first 3 month the one group will be stimulated (pallidal DBS), thereafter 12 weeks open follow up, where patients in both groups are stimulated.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Stimulation group | Experimental | Device: ACTIVA® PC neurostimulator (Model 37601)Patients in the stimulation group will be stimulated immediately after implantation of the Stimulator (ACTIVA® PC neurostimulator (Model 37601)) |
| Non-stimulation group | Sham comparator | Device: ACTIVA® PC neurostimulator (Model 37601)Patients in the non-stimulation group will not be stimulated for the first three months after implantation of the Stimulator (ACTIVA® PC neurostimulator (Model 37601)) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Clinically symptomatic and genetically confirmed HD (number of CAG repeats ≥ 36)
- Age ≥18 years
- Moderate stage of the disease (UHDRS motor score ≥ 30)
- Chorea despite best medical treatment (UHDRS chorea subscore ≥ 10)
- Mattis Dementia Rating Scale ≥ 120 (or > 80% of items testable independently from motor impairment)
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Juvenile HD (Westphal variant) or predominant bradykinesia
- Postural instability with UHDRS retropulsion score > 2
- Severe comorbidity compromising operability and/or life expectancy and/or quality of life during the trial duration (e.g. cancer with life expectancy < 6 months, NYHA 3 and 4 rising the anaesthetic risk according to the anaesthesiologist)
- Acute suicidality
- Acute psychosis (symptoms within previous 6 months)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ACTIVA® PC neurostimulator (Model 37601)the stimulator in the stimulation group will be turned on after implantation of the device | Device | Non-stimulation group, Stimulation group |
Primary outcome
UHDRS-TMS difference
Time frame: 12 weeks postoperatively compared to baseline
Difference between the groups in the UHDRS total motor score (UHDRS-TMS) at 12 weeks postoperatively compared to baseline.
12 secondary outcomes
UHDRS-Chorea difference
Time frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
UHDRS-bradykinesia difference
Time frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
BFMDRS difference
Time frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
Reilmann Battery differences
Time frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
MDRS difference
Time frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
Verbal Fluency Test difference
Time frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
SDMT difference
Time frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
STROOP Test differences
Time frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
HADS-SIS difference
Time frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
PBA-s difference
Time frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
SF 36 difference
Time frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
CGI difference
Time frame: 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jan 2022.
- Background: PubMed 15293283Moro E, Lang AE, Strafella AP, Poon YY, Arango PM, Dagher A, Hutchison WD, Lozano AM. Bilateral globus pallidus stimulation for Huntington's disease. Ann Neurol. 2004 Aug;56(2):290-4. doi: 10.1002/ana.20183.
- BackgroundGroiss SJ WL, Suedmeyer, M, Ploner M, Reck C, Voges J, SturmV, Timmermann L, Schnitzler A. Effect of bilateral pallidal deep brain stimulation in Huntington's disease: A case report. Mov Disord, Volume 21, Issue S15. Tenth International Congress of Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders. Kyoto 2006.
- Background: PubMed 19050408Fasano A, Cadeddu F, Guidubaldi A, Piano C, Soleti F, Zinzi P, Bentivoglio AR. The long-term effect of tetrabenazine in the management of Huntington disease. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2008 Nov-Dec;31(6):313-8. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0b013e318166da60.
- Background: PubMed 26347707Wojtecki L, Groiss SJ, Ferrea S, Elben S, Hartmann CJ, Dunnett SB, Rosser A, Saft C, Sudmeyer M, Ohmann C, Schnitzler A, Vesper J; Surgical Approaches Working Group of the European Huntington's Disease Network (EHDN). A Prospective Pilot Trial for Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation in Huntington's Disease. Front Neurol. 2015 Aug 18;6:177. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00177. eCollection 2015.
- Background: PubMed 27589813Wojtecki L, Groiss SJ, Hartmann CJ, Elben S, Omlor S, Schnitzler A, Vesper J. Deep Brain Stimulation in Huntington's Disease-Preliminary Evidence on Pathophysiology, Efficacy and Safety. Brain Sci. 2016 Aug 30;6(3):38. doi: 10.3390/brainsci6030038.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35766355Kinfe T, Del Vecchio A, Nussel M, Zhao Y, Stadlbauer A, Buchfelder M. Deep brain stimulation and stereotactic-assisted brain graft injection targeting fronto-striatal circuits for Huntington's disease: an update. Expert Rev Neurother. 2022 Sep;22(9):781-788. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2022.2091988. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31381524Rodrigues FB, Ferreira JJ, Wild EJ. Huntington's Disease Clinical Trials Corner: June 2019. J Huntingtons Dis. 2019;8(3):363-371. doi: 10.3233/JHD-199003.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27230813Hartmann CJ, Groiss SJ, Vesper J, Schnitzler A, Wojtecki L. Brain stimulation in Huntington's disease. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2016 Jun;6(3):223-36. doi: 10.2217/nmt-2016-0007. Epub 2016 May 27.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. After the study the data will be provided to the CHDI. The Foundation may use, and make available for use by the Foundation Collaborators, the Study Data for the following purposes: (A) to design and guide future research studies and clinical trials and (B) to support and enable the following scientific discussion and research: (1) to better understand HD or other diseases being studied, (2) that furthers the development of treatments for HD or other diseases or (3) that furthers biomedical research.
Related trials for Huntington Disease
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Study to Evaluate the Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Efficacy of SKY-0515 in Participants With Huntington's Disease
Huntington Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
Pridopidine Phase 3 Study in Huntington's Disease
Huntington Disease
Not yet recruiting
Creatine and Beta-Hydroxy-Beta-Methylbutyrate (HMB) Supplementation Plus Home-Based Exercise for Sarcopenia in Huntington's Disease
Huntington Disease, Sarcopenia
Recruiting
Feasibility and Acceptability of an LLM-based Chatbot for Family Caregivers: Evaluation Study
Caregivers
RecruitingObservational study
Development of Non-Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis for Single Gene Disorders
Invasive PreNatal Diagnosis in a Context of Family History of Single-gene Disorders, Including, Sickle Cell Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jan Vesper, Prof Dr. study chair
Dept. of Functional Neurosurgery and Stereotaxy
Alfons Schnitzler, Prof Dr principal investigator
Dept.of Neurology
12 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ACTIVA® PC neurostimulator (Model 37601) in people with Huntington Disease, run by Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf at 12 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in Germany, France, Switzerland, Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
UHDRS-TMS difference (time frame: 12 weeks postoperatively compared to baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02535884, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jan 2022.