HIVENNCT02536612
Empower, Nudge: Increasing Dual Protection in South Africa
A study testing Lottery and No Lottery in people with HIV and Pregnancy, run by Brown University at 1 site in South Africa.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to test feasibility and acceptability of a lottery to help women in Cape Town, South Africa to continue using long-acting reversible contraceptives to avoid unintended pregnancies, and to also use condoms to reduce sexually transmitted infections including HIV. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- What is being tested?
- Lottery and No Lottery
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Africa
- Study dates
- May 2015to Jun 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Female
- ages 18-40 years
- Has been pregnant within the last 12 months (and has either delivered a baby, had a miscarriage, or an abortion within the last 12 months).
- Has chosen one of the following contraceptive methods: IUD, Implant, or injectable
Who cannot join
- Unwillingness to sign an informed consent to participate in research
- Unwillingness to participate in the Control group, if so assigned in the randomization
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Africa1 site
Lady Michaelis Community Health Clinic
Cape Town, Western Cape
About this study
Official title: Empower, Nudge: Increasing Dual Protection Among Young Women in South Africa
The purpose of the study is to test feasibility and acceptability of a lottery to help women in Cape Town, South Africa to continue using long-acting reversible contraceptives to avoid unintended pregnancies, and to also use condoms to reduce sexually transmitted infections including HIV.
Read the detailed description
The overall objective is to implement a pilot project offering conditional economic incentives (CEI) for dual protection (the prevention of HIV or other sexually transmitted infections and pregnancy via the simultaneous use of condoms plus effective contraception) among young women in Cape Town, South Africa, to test feasibility and acceptability, and to gather preliminary evidence on effect sizes to inform a future efficacy trial. CEI are an innovative structural approach for dual protection, which so far has not been tested in generalized HIV epidemic settings. The project has three aims. First, it will test the feasibility and acceptability of a conditional economic incentive (CEI) program to incentivize dual protection among young women in Cape Town. The working hypothesis is that a program with modest economic incentives in the form of a lottery to continue using modern contraception and stay free of sexually transmitted infections (STI) can be implemented among young women who express a desire to avoid unintended pregnancies. The hypothesis is that the CEI treatment group will exhibit greater program participation and retention rates as compared to the control group. Second, the study will obtain estimates of the effect of CEI on the primary outcomes (adherence to the dual protection regimen) through: (1) continuation of a contraceptive method of choice throughout the six month study period, and (2) self-reported condom use. Contraceptive continuation will be measured via clinic records (proxy for clinical checkup) at the 3 and 6 month follow up visits. Self-reported condom use will not be used to provide any incentives. The hypothesis is that receipt of CEI (lotteries) will be associated with higher rates of dual protection. Third, the study will examine the degree to which CEI (lotteries) impact secondary outcomes: a urine pregnancy test and STI status (measured at baseline and 6 month follow up). A selected STI (syphilis) will be monitored for assessment of the STI outcome, using a rapid test that can be administered at clinic level. The working hypothesis is that the participants in the CEI (lottery) treatment group will have reduced rates of STI and they will have lower rates of pregnancy.
This pilot trial will include young women, ages 18-40, recruited from a community clinic in Cape Town. A maximum of 96 women will be randomly assigned to one of two arms (n=48 each) in a randomized controlled trial design. In the trial, Arm 1 (control) will receive transport compensation for study visits at each of the study visits at baseline and at months 3 and 6. Arm 2 (intervention) will receive transport compensation for study visits at each visit at baseline and at months 3 and 6, plus the opportunity for entry in a lottery. Participants in Arm 2 will have a chance to receive two lottery tickets: (a) the first when returning by month 3, subject to confirmation of continued use of the participant's preferred contraceptive; (b) the second upon completion of the six month study period, subject to confirmation of continued use of the participant's preferred contraceptive over the course of the 6 month study period; and if they are free of a new curable STI. The lottery tickets will enter the participant into a drawing for a prize at month 3 and at the end of the six month study period. All participants will receive transport compensation each time at baseline, month 3 and month 6. There will be 15-20 minute follow-up sessions for everyone at months 3 and 6 when receiving STI results, and CEI (lotteries) for those in the treatment group. At month 3, follow-up sessions will include some reinforcement of key messages related to dual protection. At months 3 and 6, the follow-up sessions will include administration of the study questionnaire.
- Being tested
- Lottery, No Lottery
- Keywords
- Motivation, Behavioral Economics, Conditional Economic Incentives, Conditional cash transfers, Contingency management
- Medical subject headings
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LotteryOther
Also called Lotto; Empower Lotto Bowl
Opportunity for entry in lottery (each time, at months 3 and 6).
No LotteryOther
Transport compensation for study visits at baseline and at months 3 and 6. No chance to win lottery ticket.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lottery | Experimental | Conditional economic incentive (CEI) lotto arm participants will get a chance to win a type of lottery or "lotto" ticket with a 50% chance of winning each time: (a) if they come back to the clinic and are still using a modern contraception method after 3 months (including IUD, injectable contraceptive, or implant); (b) if they come back to the clinic and are still using modern contraception after 6 months; and (c) if they come back to the clinic at 6 months and they don't have a new curable STD (such as syphilis).
They will also will receive reimbursement to cover their transport and time at baseline, at 3 months and at 6 months. Receives: Other: Lottery |
| No Lottery | Active comparator | Participants in the Control (No CEI Lotto) group will receive reimbursement to cover their transport and time at baseline, at 3 months and at 6 months; they will NOT have a chance to win a lottery even if they are still using a modern contraception and are free of new curable STDs. Receives: Other: No Lottery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Retention in the study
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Long-acting contraceptive continuation
continuation of a contraceptive method of choice throughout the six month study period
Measured: 6 months
Condom use
Self-reported condom use (male and/or female)
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2015
- Primary completionJun 2016
- Study completionJun 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIVStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Brown UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Brown University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Cape Town
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Omar Galarraga, PhD, Brown University
- Investigators
- Omar Galarraga, PhD, Principal investigator, Brown University School of Public HealthAbigail Harrison, PhD, Principal investigator, Brown University School of Public HealthJane Harries, PhD, Study director, University of Cape Town
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02536612
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IIA14-68
- Acronym
- EN
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 20 Aug 2015
- Last updated
- 23 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Galarraga O, Harries J, Maughan-Brown B, Cooper D, Short SE, Lurie MN, Harrison A. The Empower Nudge lottery to increase dual protection use: a proof-of-concept randomised pilot trial in South Africa. Reprod Health Matters. 2018 Dec;26(52):1510701. doi: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1510701.
PubMed 30212281Sullivan ME, Harrison A, Harries J, Sicwebu N, Rosen RK, Galarraga O. Women's reproductive decision making and abortion experiences in Cape Town, South Africa: A qualitative study. Health Care Women Int. 2018 Nov;39(11):1163-1176. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2017.1400034. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
PubMed 29111909
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Empower, Nudge: Increasing Dual Protection Among Young Women in South Africa
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02536612
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EN / IIA14-68
- Keywords
- Motivation, Behavioral Economics, Conditional Economic Incentives, Conditional cash transfers, Contingency management
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Brown UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Cape Town
- Study start
- May 2015
- Primary completion
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to test feasibility and acceptability of a lottery to help women in Cape Town, South Africa to continue using long-acting reversible contraceptives to avoid unintended pregnancies, and to also use condoms to reduce sexually transmitted infections including HIV.
Detailed description
The overall objective is to implement a pilot project offering conditional economic incentives (CEI) for dual protection (the prevention of HIV or other sexually transmitted infections and pregnancy via the simultaneous use of condoms plus effective contraception) among young women in Cape Town, South Africa, to test feasibility and acceptability, and to gather preliminary evidence on effect sizes to inform a future efficacy trial. CEI are an innovative structural approach for dual protection, which so far has not been tested in generalized HIV epidemic settings. The project has three aims. First, it will test the feasibility and acceptability of a conditional economic incentive (CEI) program to incentivize dual protection among young women in Cape Town. The working hypothesis is that a program with modest economic incentives in the form of a lottery to continue using modern contraception and stay free of sexually transmitted infections (STI) can be implemented among young women who express a desire to avoid unintended pregnancies. The hypothesis is that the CEI treatment group will exhibit greater program participation and retention rates as compared to the control group. Second, the study will obtain estimates of the effect of CEI on the primary outcomes (adherence to the dual protection regimen) through: (1) continuation of a contraceptive method of choice throughout the six month study period, and (2) self-reported condom use. Contraceptive continuation will be measured via clinic records (proxy for clinical checkup) at the 3 and 6 month follow up visits. Self-reported condom use will not be used to provide any incentives. The hypothesis is that receipt of CEI (lotteries) will be associated with higher rates of dual protection. Third, the study will examine the degree to which CEI (lotteries) impact secondary outcomes: a urine pregnancy test and STI status (measured at baseline and 6 month follow up). A selected STI (syphilis) will be monitored for assessment of the STI outcome, using a rapid test that can be administered at clinic level. The working hypothesis is that the participants in the CEI (lottery) treatment group will have reduced rates of STI and they will have lower rates of pregnancy.
This pilot trial will include young women, ages 18-40, recruited from a community clinic in Cape Town. A maximum of 96 women will be randomly assigned to one of two arms (n=48 each) in a randomized controlled trial design. In the trial, Arm 1 (control) will receive transport compensation for study visits at each of the study visits at baseline and at months 3 and 6. Arm 2 (intervention) will receive transport compensation for study visits at each visit at baseline and at months 3 and 6, plus the opportunity for entry in a lottery. Participants in Arm 2 will have a chance to receive two lottery tickets: (a) the first when returning by month 3, subject to confirmation of continued use of the participant's preferred contraceptive; (b) the second upon completion of the six month study period, subject to confirmation of continued use of the participant's preferred contraceptive over the course of the 6 month study period; and if they are free of a new curable STI. The lottery tickets will enter the participant into a drawing for a prize at month 3 and at the end of the six month study period. All participants will receive transport compensation each time at baseline, month 3 and month 6. There will be 15-20 minute follow-up sessions for everyone at months 3 and 6 when receiving STI results, and CEI (lotteries) for those in the treatment group. At month 3, follow-up sessions will include some reinforcement of key messages related to dual protection. At months 3 and 6, the follow-up sessions will include administration of the study questionnaire.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lottery | Experimental | Other: LotteryConditional economic incentive (CEI) lotto arm participants will get a chance to win a type of lottery or "lotto" ticket with a 50% chance of winning each time: (a) if they come back to the clinic and are still using a modern contraception method after 3 months (including IUD, injectable contraceptive, or implant); (b) if they come back to the clinic and are still using modern contraception after 6 months; and (c) if they come back to the clinic at 6 months and they don't have a new curable STD (such as syphilis). They will also will receive reimbursement to cover their transport and time at baseline, at 3 months and at 6 months. |
| No Lottery | Active comparator | Other: No LotteryParticipants in the Control (No CEI Lotto) group will receive reimbursement to cover their transport and time at baseline, at 3 months and at 6 months; they will NOT have a chance to win a lottery even if they are still using a modern contraception and are free of new curable STDs. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Female
- ages 18-40 years
- Has been pregnant within the last 12 months (and has either delivered a baby, had a miscarriage, or an abortion within the last 12 months).
- Has chosen one of the following contraceptive methods: IUD, Implant, or injectable
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Unwillingness to sign an informed consent to participate in research
- Unwillingness to participate in the Control group, if so assigned in the randomization
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LotteryAlso: Lotto; Empower Lotto BowlOpportunity for entry in lottery (each time, at months 3 and 6). | Other | Lottery |
| No LotteryTransport compensation for study visits at baseline and at months 3 and 6. No chance to win lottery ticket. | Other | No Lottery |
Primary outcome
Retention in the study
Time frame: 6 months
2 secondary outcomes
Long-acting contraceptive continuation
Time frame: 6 months
Condom use
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jul 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 30212281Galarraga O, Harries J, Maughan-Brown B, Cooper D, Short SE, Lurie MN, Harrison A. The Empower Nudge lottery to increase dual protection use: a proof-of-concept randomised pilot trial in South Africa. Reprod Health Matters. 2018 Dec;26(52):1510701. doi: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1510701.
- Results publication: PubMed 29111909Sullivan ME, Harrison A, Harries J, Sicwebu N, Rosen RK, Galarraga O. Women's reproductive decision making and abortion experiences in Cape Town, South Africa: A qualitative study. Health Care Women Int. 2018 Nov;39(11):1163-1176. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2017.1400034. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
- Women's Health Research Unit webpageLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for HIV
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Omar Galarraga, PhD principal investigator
Brown University School of Public Health
Abigail Harrison, PhD principal investigator
Brown University School of Public Health
Jane Harries, PhD study director
University of Cape Town
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Lottery and No Lottery in people with HIV and Pregnancy, run by Brown University at 1 site in South Africa.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Retention in the study (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02536612, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2021.