Missing ToothNCT02536716
The Effect of Platform-Matching Versus Platform-Switching Dental Implants on Peri-implant Hard and Soft Tissue Healing
A study testing Platform-matched dental implant and Platform-switched dental implant in people with Missing Tooth, run by University of Louisville at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
To compare platform-switched implants to platform-matched implants for replacement of a single missing tooth and their effect on: 1) Interproximal alveolar crest level in relation to implant platform. 2) Buccal implant recession. 3) Presence or absence of black triangle apical to the contact point. 4) Implant Success. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Missing Tooth
- What is being tested?
- Platform-matched dental implant and Platform-switched dental implant
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 12 Jan 2016to 21 Jul 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 1. Have one edentulous site bordered by 2 teeth.
- 2. Healthy persons at least 18 years old.
- 3. Understands and has signed the informed consent.
Who cannot join
- 1. Patients with uncontrolled diabetes, immune disease, or systemic disease that significantly affects the periodontium.
- 2. Previous head and neck radiation.
- 3. Patients who have been on IV bisphosphonates or oral bisphosphonates for > 3 years.
- 4. Smokers.
- 5. Patients who need prophylactic antibiotics prior to dental procedures.
- 6. Patients with allergy to any medication or material used in the study.
Show all 11Show fewer
- 7. Chemotherapy in the previous 12 months.
- 8. Severe psychological problems.
- 9. Patients unable to sign the informed consent.
- 10. Pregnant patients.
- 11. History of allergy to common dentifrice ingredients.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Platform-Matching Versus Platform-Switching Using Standard Internal Versus Tapered Internal Plus Dental Implants on Peri-implant Hard and Soft Tissue Healing
To compare platform-switched implants to platform-matched implants for replacement of a single missing tooth and their effect on: 1) Interproximal alveolar crest level in relation to implant platform. 2) Buccal implant recession. 3) Presence or absence of black triangle apical to the contact point. 4) Implant Success. 5) Adequate buccal tissue thickness.
Read the detailed description
Thirty patients will have a dental implant placed. Fifteen patients will be randomly selected by a coin toss to receive a platform-switched implant while the other fifteen will receive platform-matched implant. Each patient will receive a diagnostic work-up including standardized radiographs (periapicals), study casts, clinical photographs, and a clinical examination of teeth adjacent to the edentulous sites. Pre-surgical preparation will include detailed oral hygiene instructions. Baseline data will be collected at initial exam, and at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months. Parameters measured will include: plaque index, gingival index, probing depth, keratinized tissue, bleeding on probing, and digital radiographic examination. Pre-surgical measurements will include: cemento-enamel junction to osseous crest on adjacent teeth by direct measurement at surgery, and by radiograph at baseline, 2, 4, 6, and 12 months, periodontal form, periodontal biotype, tooth shape, and papilla harmony. Patients will be randomly selected for treatment group assignment using a coin toss before surgery by the mentor. One investigator who is unaware of group assignment will perform all baseline examinations and all follow-up examinations. Means and standard deviations will be calculated for all parameters. A paired t-test will be used to evaluate the statistical significance of the differences between initial and final data. An unpaired t-test will be used to evaluate statistical differences between the test and control groups. A sample size of 15 gives 80% statistical power to detect a difference of 0.5 mm of implant bone loss between groups. All surgical procedures will be completed by one operator under the direction of one mentor. Pre-surgical measurements will be taken first. Local anesthesia will be administered. The surgical procedure will consist of the reflection of full thickness flaps to expose the alveolar crest. The implant platform will be placed 3 to 4 mm apical to the mid-facial gingival margin using dental implant osteotomy drills for preparation of the site. The surgical procedures will be documented with clinical photographs. Sutures will be used to close the flap and bury the implant under the tissue. Records will be kept of healing periodically for the first 8 weeks, then at 4, 6 and 12 months. The test group will use a BioHorizons Tapered Internal Plus "platform-switched" implant. The control group will be BioHorizons standard Internal "platform-matched" implant. All patients will be seen at 1-2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks to monitor healing. At week 8 the implant will be uncovered surgically and provisionalized, and at the 4 month visit the final crown will be placed. Subsequent examinations will take place at 6 and 12 months. Post-surgically, patients will take an antibiotic (doxycycline hyclate 100 mg once a day for two weeks), an analgesic (Vicodin ES every 4-6 hours as needed for pain), and an anti-inflammatory agent (Naproxen 375mg every 12 hours for one week). At post-operative visits plaque removal, and oral hygiene instruction, as needed, will be performed along with clinical photographs and standardized radiographs as scheduled. The results of this study will allow comparison of peri-implant soft and hard tissue healing following placement of a BioHorizons "platform-switched" Tapered Internal Plus implant versus a standard Internal "platform-matched" implant in terms of the effect on marginal bone loss, buccal recession, and papilla fill.
- Conditions
- Missing Tooth
- Being tested
- Platform-matched dental implant, Platform-switched dental implant
- Keywords
- Dental Implant
- Medical subject headings
- Anodontia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Platform-matched dental implantProcedure or surgery
A platform-matched dental implant will be placed surgically, restored with a crown and evaluated for up to 12 months.
Platform-switched dental implantProcedure or surgery
A platform-switched dental implant will be placed surgically, restored with a crown and evaluated for up to 12 months.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Platform-matched dental implant | Active comparator | Platform-matched dental implant placement to measure marginal bone loss, gingival margin position, and papilla fill. Receives: Procedure: Platform-matched dental implant |
| Platform-switched dental implant | Experimental | Platform-switched dental implant placement to measure marginal bone loss, gingival margin position, and papilla fill. Receives: Procedure: Platform-switched dental implant |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Marginal alveolar bone loss
Bone loss will be measured radiographically using a stent
Measured: 12-months post dental implant placement
Secondary outcomes (3)
Buccal implant recession
Buccal implant recession will be measured using a North Carolina probe using the adjacent teeth and incisal edge of the crown
Measured: 12-months post dental implant placement
Papilla fill
Presence or absence of black triangle apical to the contact point
Measured: 12-months post dental implant placement
Buccal soft tissue thickness around implant
Thickness will be measured with an endodontic file using a rubber stopper (objective measure of tissue thickness by penetrating tissue and measuring the thickness in mm).
Measured: 12-months post dental implant placement
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Study start12 Jan 2016
- Primary completion21 Jul 2017
- Study completion21 Jul 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Missing ToothStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Louisville
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Henry Greenwell, University of Louisville
- Investigators
- Henry Greenwell, DMD, Principal investigator, University of Louisville
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02536716
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 15.0448
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 28 Aug 2015
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Platform-Matching Versus Platform-Switching Using Standard Internal Versus Tapered Internal Plus Dental Implants on Peri-implant Hard and Soft Tissue Healing
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02536716
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 15.0448
- Conditions
- Missing Tooth
- Keywords
- Dental Implant
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of LouisvilleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 Jan 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Jul 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To compare platform-switched implants to platform-matched implants for replacement of a single missing tooth and their effect on: 1) Interproximal alveolar crest level in relation to implant platform. 2) Buccal implant recession. 3) Presence or absence of black triangle apical to the contact point. 4) Implant Success. 5) Adequate buccal tissue thickness.
Detailed description
Thirty patients will have a dental implant placed. Fifteen patients will be randomly selected by a coin toss to receive a platform-switched implant while the other fifteen will receive platform-matched implant. Each patient will receive a diagnostic work-up including standardized radiographs (periapicals), study casts, clinical photographs, and a clinical examination of teeth adjacent to the edentulous sites. Pre-surgical preparation will include detailed oral hygiene instructions. Baseline data will be collected at initial exam, and at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months. Parameters measured will include: plaque index, gingival index, probing depth, keratinized tissue, bleeding on probing, and digital radiographic examination. Pre-surgical measurements will include: cemento-enamel junction to osseous crest on adjacent teeth by direct measurement at surgery, and by radiograph at baseline, 2, 4, 6, and 12 months, periodontal form, periodontal biotype, tooth shape, and papilla harmony. Patients will be randomly selected for treatment group assignment using a coin toss before surgery by the mentor. One investigator who is unaware of group assignment will perform all baseline examinations and all follow-up examinations. Means and standard deviations will be calculated for all parameters. A paired t-test will be used to evaluate the statistical significance of the differences between initial and final data. An unpaired t-test will be used to evaluate statistical differences between the test and control groups. A sample size of 15 gives 80% statistical power to detect a difference of 0.5 mm of implant bone loss between groups. All surgical procedures will be completed by one operator under the direction of one mentor. Pre-surgical measurements will be taken first. Local anesthesia will be administered. The surgical procedure will consist of the reflection of full thickness flaps to expose the alveolar crest. The implant platform will be placed 3 to 4 mm apical to the mid-facial gingival margin using dental implant osteotomy drills for preparation of the site. The surgical procedures will be documented with clinical photographs. Sutures will be used to close the flap and bury the implant under the tissue. Records will be kept of healing periodically for the first 8 weeks, then at 4, 6 and 12 months. The test group will use a BioHorizons Tapered Internal Plus "platform-switched" implant. The control group will be BioHorizons standard Internal "platform-matched" implant. All patients will be seen at 1-2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks to monitor healing. At week 8 the implant will be uncovered surgically and provisionalized, and at the 4 month visit the final crown will be placed. Subsequent examinations will take place at 6 and 12 months. Post-surgically, patients will take an antibiotic (doxycycline hyclate 100 mg once a day for two weeks), an analgesic (Vicodin ES every 4-6 hours as needed for pain), and an anti-inflammatory agent (Naproxen 375mg every 12 hours for one week). At post-operative visits plaque removal, and oral hygiene instruction, as needed, will be performed along with clinical photographs and standardized radiographs as scheduled. The results of this study will allow comparison of peri-implant soft and hard tissue healing following placement of a BioHorizons "platform-switched" Tapered Internal Plus implant versus a standard Internal "platform-matched" implant in terms of the effect on marginal bone loss, buccal recession, and papilla fill.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Platform-matched dental implant | Active comparator | Procedure: Platform-matched dental implantPlatform-matched dental implant placement to measure marginal bone loss, gingival margin position, and papilla fill. |
| Platform-switched dental implant | Experimental | Procedure: Platform-switched dental implantPlatform-switched dental implant placement to measure marginal bone loss, gingival margin position, and papilla fill. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- 1. Have one edentulous site bordered by 2 teeth.
- 2. Healthy persons at least 18 years old.
- 3. Understands and has signed the informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- 1. Patients with uncontrolled diabetes, immune disease, or systemic disease that significantly affects the periodontium.
- 2. Previous head and neck radiation.
- 3. Patients who have been on IV bisphosphonates or oral bisphosphonates for > 3 years.
- 4. Smokers.
- 5. Patients who need prophylactic antibiotics prior to dental procedures.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Platform-matched dental implantA platform-matched dental implant will be placed surgically, restored with a crown and evaluated for up to 12 months. | Procedure or surgery | Platform-matched dental implant |
| Platform-switched dental implantA platform-switched dental implant will be placed surgically, restored with a crown and evaluated for up to 12 months. | Procedure or surgery | Platform-switched dental implant |
Primary outcome
Marginal alveolar bone loss
Time frame: 12-months post dental implant placement
Bone loss will be measured radiographically using a stent
3 secondary outcomes
Buccal implant recession
Time frame: 12-months post dental implant placement
Papilla fill
Time frame: 12-months post dental implant placement
Buccal soft tissue thickness around implant
Time frame: 12-months post dental implant placement
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2020.
Related trials for Missing Tooth
Recruiting
Dental Implant Healing With TNF-Alpha Inhibitors
Dental Implants, TNF-alpha Inhibitors
Recruiting
Effect of Changing Grafting Sequences During Sinus Lifting & Simultaneous Implant Placement in the Gained Bone Using Customized Surgical Guide
Vertical Bone Defects, Missing Tooth/Teeth
RecruitingObservational study
Post Market Clinical Follow up (PMCF) Medical Device Registry of Z-Systems Zirconia Dental Products: Z-Systems Registry
Missing Teeth
Not yet recruiting
Multicenter Clinical Study on the Efficacy and Esthetic Outcomes of Immediate Implant Placement Using the Socket-Shield Technique Versus Conventional Immediate Implantation in the Anterior Maxillary Esthetic Zone
Teeth Absent, Teeth Missing
Active, not recruiting
Enhancing Soft Tissues Around Inserted Implants by Two Different Methods
Missing Teeth
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Henry Greenwell, DMD principal investigator
University of Louisville
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Platform-matched dental implant and Platform-switched dental implant in people with Missing Tooth, run by University of Louisville at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Marginal alveolar bone loss (time frame: 12-months post dental implant placement). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2020.