Mental DisordersNCT02541890
Effects of Workplace Intervention in Occupational Rehabilitation on Return to Work
A study testing Work place intervention in people with Mental Disorders and Musculoskeletal Diseases, run by Norwegian University of Science and Technology at 1 site in Norway.
Trial summary
Aim is to study the effect of a work place intervention during a multicomponent return-to-work rehabilitation program on return-to-work. The intervention is compared with inpatient rehabilitation only, and participants will be recruited from the diagnostic groups dominating the sick-leave statistics, namely… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Mental Disorders, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic
- What is being tested?
- Work place intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 175 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNorway
- Study dates
- Apr 2015to Mar 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Resident of Central Norway
- Sick-listed due to common mental disorders, musculoskeletal pain/problems, unspecific disorders and/or fatigue
- Sick-listed more than 50 %
- Sick-listed longer than 8 weeks
- Has employer and is willing to participate in a work place intervention during the rehabilitation program
Who cannot join
- is self-employed
- has, or is currently examined for, a serious somatic or psychiatric disorder
- suffers from substance abuse
- has trouble with participating in a group
- is in a rehabilitation process that will interfere with the occupational rehabilitation program
- function level is to weak to participate in the rehabilitation program
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Norway1 site
Nowegian University of Science and Technology, Department of public health
Trondheim, 7491
About this study
Official title: Effects of Workplace Intervention in Inpatient Occupational Rehabilitation on Return to Work for Persons With Somatic and/or Common Mental Health Problems. A Randomised Controlled Trial
Aim is to study the effect of a work place intervention during a multicomponent return-to-work rehabilitation program on return-to-work. The intervention is compared with inpatient rehabilitation only, and participants will be recruited from the diagnostic groups dominating the sick-leave statistics, namely musculoskeletal disorders, common mental disorders (e.g. stress, depression and anxiety), and unspecific disorders including chronic fatigue.
Read the detailed description
Long-term sick-listing from work has considerable impact on social function, on the families of the sick-listed persons, the companies they work for, and society as a whole. Hence, the need for documented effective vocational rehabilitation programs is pressing. Vocational rehabilitation services described in the scientific literature have been specific to one single or a specific group of medical conditions (e.g.low back pain). In contrast, most people on sick leave have several health complaints, and many of the factors influencing sick leave are shared regardless of disorder (e.g. social surroundings, workplace environment), calling for rehabilitation programs that can be employed for both musculoskeletal, unspecific and common mental disorders. Research indicates that interventions on the work place might facilitate return to work. The aim of this study is therefore to investigate the effect of a work place intervention during a multicomponent return-to-work rehabilitation program on return-to-work.
- Being tested
- Work place intervention
- Keywords
- Rehabilitation, Return to Work
- Medical subject headings
- Mental Disorders, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Work place interventionBehavioural
Meeting at the work place including the patient, the employer and the rehabilitation therapist. Aim of meeting is to discuss challenges and possibilities in the patient's return to work process and to make a plan for return to work.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Work place intervention | Experimental | Work place intervention in addition to rehabilitation program. Receives: Behavioral: Work place intervention |
| Rehabilitation program only | No intervention | Rehabilitation program without intervention at the work place. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of days on sick-leave
Register data from the national health and welfare services
Measured: 12 months
Time until sustainable return to work
Register data from the national health and welfare services
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (10)
Use of health services. Questionnaire. "How much of this health/social service have you used during the last 4 months?"
160 participants. "How much of this health/social service have you used during the last 4 months?" Somatic and mental health specialized care (in-patient and outpatient), general practitioner, psychologist, group therapy, physiotherapist, chiropractor, occupational rehabilitation, welfare services, complementary practitioner, emergency unit, ambulatory services, occupational health services, other treatment.
Measured: 12 months
Pain. Questionnaire
Brief pain inventory (BPI). 160 participants
Measured: 12 months
Health related quality of life. Questionnaire
The 15D health-related quality of life instrument. 160 participants
Measured: 12 months
Psychological flexibility and acceptance. Questionnaire
Acceptance and action questionnaire and work acceptance and action questionnaire (AAQ2). 160 participants
Measured: 5 months
Return to work self efficacy. Questionnaire.
Return to work self-efficacy-19 (RTWSE-19). 160 participants.
Measured: 5 months
Fear and avoidance beliefs about work. Questionnaire
Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ). 160 participants
Measured: 5 months
Expectations about sick leave and return to work. Questionnaire
160 participants. "How long do you anticipate to be sick-listed (partly/fully)?" 3 questions.
Measured: 5 months
Work ability. Single question
160 participants. "How will you rate your work ability?" (scale from 0 (no ability) to 10 (my best ability)).
Measured: 5 months
Well-being at work. Single question
160 participants. "How happy are you at work?" (not at all, not so good, good. very good)
Measured: 5 months
Readiness for return to work. Questionnaire
160 participants. Readiness for return to work (RRTW) questionnaire.
Measured: 5 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2015
- Primary completionJul 2017
- Study completionMar 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Mental DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 175 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Trondheim University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Marius S Fimland, PhD, Principal investigator, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02541890
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2014/2279
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 18 Aug 2015
- Last updated
- 13 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Rise MB, Skagseth M, Klevanger NE, Aasdahl L, Borchgrevink P, Jensen C, Tenggren H, Halsteinli V, Jacobsen TN, Loland SB, Johnsen R, Fimland MS. Design of a study evaluating the effects, health economics, and stakeholder perspectives of a multi-component occupational rehabilitation program with an added workplace intervention - a study protocol. BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 5;18(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5130-5.
PubMed 29402253Skagseth M, Fimland MS, Rise MB, Johnsen R, Borchgrevink PC, Aasdahl L. Effectiveness of adding a workplace intervention to an inpatient multimodal occupational rehabilitation program: A randomized clinical trial. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020 Jul 1;46(4):356-363. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3873. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
PubMed 31834410Klevanger NE, Fimland MS, Rise MB. Aligning stakeholders' understandings of the return-to-work process: a qualitative study on workplace meetings in inpatient multimodal occupational rehabilitation. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1946927. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2021.1946927.
PubMed 34278973
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Workplace Intervention in Inpatient Occupational Rehabilitation on Return to Work for Persons With Somatic and/or Common Mental Health Problems. A Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02541890
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2014/2279
- Keywords
- Rehabilitation, Return to Work
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 175 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Trondheim University Hospital
- Study start
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Aim is to study the effect of a work place intervention during a multicomponent return-to-work rehabilitation program on return-to-work. The intervention is compared with inpatient rehabilitation only, and participants will be recruited from the diagnostic groups dominating the sick-leave statistics, namely musculoskeletal disorders, common mental disorders (e.g. stress, depression and anxiety), and unspecific disorders including chronic fatigue.
Detailed description
Long-term sick-listing from work has considerable impact on social function, on the families of the sick-listed persons, the companies they work for, and society as a whole. Hence, the need for documented effective vocational rehabilitation programs is pressing. Vocational rehabilitation services described in the scientific literature have been specific to one single or a specific group of medical conditions (e.g.low back pain). In contrast, most people on sick leave have several health complaints, and many of the factors influencing sick leave are shared regardless of disorder (e.g. social surroundings, workplace environment), calling for rehabilitation programs that can be employed for both musculoskeletal, unspecific and common mental disorders. Research indicates that interventions on the work place might facilitate return to work. The aim of this study is therefore to investigate the effect of a work place intervention during a multicomponent return-to-work rehabilitation program on return-to-work.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Work place intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Work place interventionWork place intervention in addition to rehabilitation program. |
| Rehabilitation program only | No intervention | –Rehabilitation program without intervention at the work place. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Resident of Central Norway
- Sick-listed due to common mental disorders, musculoskeletal pain/problems, unspecific disorders and/or fatigue
- Sick-listed more than 50 %
- Sick-listed longer than 8 weeks
- Has employer and is willing to participate in a work place intervention during the rehabilitation program
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- is self-employed
- has, or is currently examined for, a serious somatic or psychiatric disorder
- suffers from substance abuse
- has trouble with participating in a group
- is in a rehabilitation process that will interfere with the occupational rehabilitation program
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Work place interventionMeeting at the work place including the patient, the employer and the rehabilitation therapist. Aim of meeting is to discuss challenges and possibilities in the patient's return to work process and to make a plan for return to work. | Behavioural | Work place intervention |
Primary outcome
Number of days on sick-leave
Time frame: 12 months
Register data from the national health and welfare services
Time until sustainable return to work
Time frame: 12 months
Register data from the national health and welfare services
10 secondary outcomes
Use of health services. Questionnaire. "How much of this health/social service have you used during the last 4 months?"
Time frame: 12 months
Pain. Questionnaire
Time frame: 12 months
Health related quality of life. Questionnaire
Time frame: 12 months
Psychological flexibility and acceptance. Questionnaire
Time frame: 5 months
Return to work self efficacy. Questionnaire.
Time frame: 5 months
Fear and avoidance beliefs about work. Questionnaire
Time frame: 5 months
Expectations about sick leave and return to work. Questionnaire
Time frame: 5 months
Work ability. Single question
Time frame: 5 months
Well-being at work. Single question
Time frame: 5 months
Readiness for return to work. Questionnaire
Time frame: 5 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Aug 2021.
- Background: PubMed 29402253Rise MB, Skagseth M, Klevanger NE, Aasdahl L, Borchgrevink P, Jensen C, Tenggren H, Halsteinli V, Jacobsen TN, Loland SB, Johnsen R, Fimland MS. Design of a study evaluating the effects, health economics, and stakeholder perspectives of a multi-component occupational rehabilitation program with an added workplace intervention - a study protocol. BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 5;18(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5130-5.
- Results publication: PubMed 31834410Skagseth M, Fimland MS, Rise MB, Johnsen R, Borchgrevink PC, Aasdahl L. Effectiveness of adding a workplace intervention to an inpatient multimodal occupational rehabilitation program: A randomized clinical trial. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020 Jul 1;46(4):356-363. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3873. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 34278973Klevanger NE, Fimland MS, Rise MB. Aligning stakeholders' understandings of the return-to-work process: a qualitative study on workplace meetings in inpatient multimodal occupational rehabilitation. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1946927. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2021.1946927.
Related trials for Mental Disorders
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
An Open-Label Study to Assess the Long-Term Safety of Solriamfetol in Children and Adolescents With ADHD
ADHD
Recruiting
Unified Protocol in Penitentiary Facilities
Depression Disorders, Anxiety
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marius S Fimland, PhD principal investigator
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Work place intervention in people with Mental Disorders and Musculoskeletal Diseases, run by Norwegian University of Science and Technology at 1 site in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of days on sick-leave (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02541890, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2021.