Multiple SclerosisNCT02544373
CPAP to Treat Cognitive Dysfunction in MS
A study testing PAP therapy in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The objectives of this study are to determine the effects of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on cognitive function in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS); and to evaluate whether OSA treatment with positive airway pressure therapy could improve cognitive dysfunction in MS patients who have OSA. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Sclerosis
- What is being tested?
- PAP therapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 135 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 12 Nov 2015to 25 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age of 18-70 years at screening
- Diagnosis of clinically definite MS
- Willingness to undergo in-lab baseline polysomnography (PSG) and positive airway pressure (PAP) titration (if needed)
- Willingness to undergo 2 separate 90-minute cognitive testing sessions
- Either one of the following:
- Score of >=2 sleep apnea risk factors on the "STOP-Bang" sleep apnea screening questionnaire. The STOP-Bang questionnaire is a screening tool consisting of eight items which reflect OSA risk factors. STOP-Bang scores of ≥3 indicate elevated risk for moderate-severe OSA in the general population, and scores as low as 2 are frequently seen in MS patients with OSA, based on previous data from the PI).
Show all 9Show fewer
- OR
- Have a pre-existing diagnosis of OSA based on a previous overnight sleep study (either home study or in-lab) but have not yet started using PAP therapy on a compliant basis. If OSA was NOT diagnosed by a U-M in-lab sleep study within the past year prior to screening, subjects must be willing to get new baseline in-lab U-M PSG as part of study.
- Willingness to start treatment with PAP if OSA present
Who cannot join
- Physical, psychiatric or cognitive impairment that prevents informed consent, PSG, PAP use, or reliable longitudinal follow-up
- Cardiopulmonary conditions that may increase sleep apnea risk
- Current treatment, such as PAP, for obstructive or central sleep apnea
- History of surgical treatment for OSA
- Nervous system diseases other than MS that may predispose subjects to OSA (such as Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or recent stroke)
- History of concomitant central nervous system disease that could influence cognition, such as large vessel territory stroke, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, or Lewy body dementia
Show all 16Show fewer
- Concomitant systemic autoimmune disease with secondary central nervous system involvement (including CNS lupus or neurosarcoidosis).
- Pregnancy
- Evidence of clinical MS relapse within the last 30 days prior to enrollment
- Systemic high dose steroid use (1 gram IV methylprednisolone daily for 3-5 days or equivalent)for an MS relapse within the last 30 days prior to enrollment
- Unwillingness to initiate PAP therapy if clinically indicated
- Severe depression at screening per the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) (The PHQ-8 is a brief, self-administered questionnaire that evaluates core symptoms associated with major depressive disorder. Scores range from 0 to 24 based on the frequency and severity of depressive symptoms over the previous two weeks.)
- Anticipated initiation, dosage change, or discontinuation in medications that could, per the opinion of the investigators, influence cognitive test scores from baseline to follow-up, including MS disease modifying therapies, hypnotic agents, narcotic-based medications, benzodiazepines, antispasmodics, or 4-aminopyridine
- ESS scores >= 16 on baseline visit
- Subjects with extreme OSA accompanied by signs of cardiopulmonary compromise (RDI>60 respiratory events per hour with severe nocturnal hypoxia or unstable ECG rhythms on PSG), will be excluded unless they are randomized to immediate PAP arm
- Any other condition or treatment that in the opinion of the investigator could affect subject safety or study eligibility
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Michigan Medical Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Trial of Positive Airway Pressure Therapy to Treat Cognitive Dysfunction in MS Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea
The objectives of this study are to determine the effects of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on cognitive function in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS); and to evaluate whether OSA treatment with positive airway pressure therapy could improve cognitive dysfunction in MS patients who have OSA.
Read the detailed description
Up to 70% of patients with MS suffer from cognitive dysfunction (difficulties with thinking, information processing, verbal expression, or memory). Cognitive dysfunction is one of the most disabling symptoms of MS, that can profoundly affect job performance, family responsibilities, and quality of life. While no treatments have been shown to improve cognitive dysfunction in MS, many patients have not been evaluated or treated for other common health problems that could be contributing to their cognitive dysfunction.
Up to 50% of MS patients also suffer from obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Obstructive sleep apnea is a common disorder in which the upper airway collapses during sleep, causing poor sleep quality and decreased oxygen levels in the blood. In patients without MS, OSA is a well-established cause of poor cognitive performance. Recent studies of non-MS patients also suggest that cognitive performance may improve with OSA treatment. Yet, despite the high number of MS patients with OSA, the relationship between OSA and cognitive performance, and the effects of OSA treatment on cognitive performance in MS, has not received sufficient study.
The objectives of this study are to determine the effects of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on cognitive function in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS); and to evaluate whether OSA treatment with positive airway pressure therapy could improve cognitive dysfunction in MS patients who also have OSA.
Interested participants with MS who screen positive on a commonly used screening tool used to detect those at high risk for OSA will be invited to participate. Consenting participants will have a baseline cognitive (memory and thinking) test to assess their cognitive function, and an overnight sleep study (polysomnogram, or PSG) to determine if they have obstructive sleep apnea. If the sleep study shows signs of sleep apnea, participants will be assigned treatment for their sleep apnea with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy, either immediately (Group 1), or 3 months after the baseline sleep study (Group 2). Groups will be assigned at random (like flipping a coin). There is a 2/3 chance that participants will be assigned to Group 1. PAP therapy is considered standard clinical care for OSA. It involves wearing an apparatus that includes a hose and a mask (that covers the nose, or nose and mouth), connected to a small machine that blows air into the airway during sleep. In order to determine which airway pressure most effectively treats an individual's sleep apnea, and what type of mask is needed, a separate sleep study known as an overnight "PAP titration study" will also be performed. This study is similar to a PSG but also involves fitting of various masks which are then hooked up to the individual and PAP machine to test the effectiveness of various PAP settings, and to determine which mask is most tolerable for the individual.
Participants will also receive repeat cognitive testing at 3 months to see if the immediate sleep apnea treatment group (Group 1) shows improvements memory and thinking, as compared to the standard care treatment group (Group 2), who will not start apnea treatment until after their repeat cognitive test. Participants will be compensated for their travel and time throughout the course of the study.
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Being tested
- PAP therapy
- Keywords
- OSA, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Cognition, Cognitive Dysfunction, Memory, Positive Aiway Pressure, CPAP, MS
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Sclerosis, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Cognitive Dysfunction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PAP therapyDevice
Also called Positive airway pressure, CPAP, BiPAP, Continuous positive airway pressure
Positive airway pressure treatment for obstructive sleep apnea
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate PAP therapy (Group 1) | Active comparator | Subjects will receive PAP treatment for OSA as soon as possible after baseline PSG and repeat baseline cognitive testing 3 months after initiation of PAP therapy. PAP therapy is considered standard clinical care for OSA. It involves wearing an apparatus that includes a hose and a mask (that covers the nose, or nose and mouth), connected to a small machine that blows air into the airway during sleep. The degree of air pressure given depends on your apnea severity, and the supplied air pressure can be continuous or change with your breathing pattern (bilevel). Receives: Device: PAP therapy |
| Standard Care PAP therapy (Group 2) | Other | Subjects will delay PAP treatment for 3 months following their baseline sleep study, and repeat their baseline cognitive testing prior to PAP treatment for sleep apnea. PAP therapy is considered standard clinical care for OSA. It involves wearing an apparatus that includes a hose and a mask (that covers the nose, or nose and mouth), connected to a small machine that blows air into the airway during sleep. The degree of air pressure given depends on your apnea severity, and the supplied air pressure can be continuous or change with your breathing pattern (bilevel). Receives: Device: PAP therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Association Between Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Severity [as Measured by Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) e.g., Number of Apneic Events Per Hour of Sleep] and Baseline Performance on the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in MS Battery (MACFIMS)
Bivariate associations between AHI measured with PSG, and baseline MACFIMS test results which include:
- Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT): verbal fluency;
- Judgement of Line Orientation test (JLO): visuospatial perception;
- Brief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised Total (BVMT-R Total) and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised Delayed (BVMT-R Delayed): visual memory \& learning;
- California Verbal Learning Test-II Total score (CVLT-II): verbal memory \& learning;
- Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test-2 (PASAT-2), Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test-3 (PASAT-3) and Symbol Digit Modalities test (SDMT): memory, attention, processing speed.
For each test higher scores indicate better cognitive performance. Beta coefficients were generated with multiple linear regression models, yielding the confidence intervals shown below.
Measured: Participants had up to 3 weeks to complete both baseline cognitive testing and PSG
Change From Baseline in Performance on the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in MS Battery (MACFIMS)
Mean change in scores on individual MACFIMS tests from baseline to month 3 cognitive testing, as calculated by Month 3 minus baseline score shown by treatment group. MACFIMS tests with score ranges (minimum-maximum) are listed here:
- Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) 0 - no recognized upper limit;
- Judgement of Line Orientation test (JLO) 0-34 based on scores adjusted for age and sex;
- Brief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised Total (BVMT-R Total) 0-36;
- Brief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised Delayed (BVMT-R Delayed), 0-12;
- California Verbal Learning Test-II Total score (CVLT-II); (T scores necessary for analysis; 50=population mean; 10=SD);
- Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test-2 (PASAT-2), 0-60;
- Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test-3 (PASAT-3) 0-60; and
- Symbol Digit Modalities test (SDMT) 0-110. For all measures, higher scores mean better performance, so based on subtracting 3 month values minus baseline, any positive numbers indicate improvement.
Measured: baseline, 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Study start12 Nov 2015
- Primary completion25 Jun 2021
- Study completion25 Jun 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (26)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Multiple SclerosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MichiganThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 135 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Multiple Sclerosis Society
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Tiffany J. Braley, MD, MS, University of Michigan
- Investigators
- Tiffany Braley, MD, MS, Principal investigator, University of Michigan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02544373
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HUM00098738
- Status last verified
- Aug 2022
- First submitted
- 26 May 2015
- Last updated
- 14 Sep 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Publications
Brassington JC, Marsh NV. Neuropsychological aspects of multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychol Rev. 1998 Jun;8(2):43-77. doi: 10.1023/a:1025621700003.
PubMed 9658410Diamond BJ, DeLuca J, Kim H, Kelley SM. The question of disproportionate impairments in visual and auditory information processing in multiple sclerosis. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997 Feb;19(1):34-42. doi: 10.1080/01688639708403834.
PubMed 9071639DeLuca J, Barbieri-Berger S, Johnson SK. The nature of memory impairments in multiple sclerosis: acquisition versus retrieval. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994 Apr;16(2):183-9. doi: 10.1080/01688639408402629.
PubMed 8021305Kujala P, Portin R, Ruutiainen J. Memory deficits and early cognitive deterioration in MS. Acta Neurol Scand. 1996 May;93(5):329-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1996.tb00005.x.
PubMed 8800343Rao SM, Leo GJ, Bernardin L, Unverzagt F. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology. 1991 May;41(5):685-91. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.5.685.
PubMed 2027484Peyser JM, Rao SM, LaRocca NG, Kaplan E. Guidelines for neuropsychological research in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 1990 Jan;47(1):94-7. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1990.00530010120030.
PubMed 2403789Beatty WW, Paul RH, Wilbanks SL, Hames KA, Blanco CR, Goodkin DE. Identifying multiple sclerosis patients with mild or global cognitive impairment using the Screening Examination for Cognitive Impairment (SEFCI). Neurology. 1995 Apr;45(4):718-23. doi: 10.1212/wnl.45.4.718.
PubMed 7723961Knight RG, Devereux RC, Godfrey HP. Psychosocial consequences of caring for a spouse with multiple sclerosis. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997 Feb;19(1):7-19. doi: 10.1080/01688639708403832.
PubMed 9071637Rao SM, Leo GJ, Ellington L, Nauertz T, Bernardin L, Unverzagt F. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. II. Impact on employment and social functioning. Neurology. 1991 May;41(5):692-6. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.5.692.
PubMed 1823781O'Brien AR, Chiaravalloti N, Goverover Y, Deluca J. Evidenced-based cognitive rehabilitation for persons with multiple sclerosis: a review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Apr;89(4):761-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.019.
PubMed 18374010Canessa N, Castronovo V, Cappa SF, Aloia MS, Marelli S, Falini A, Alemanno F, Ferini-Strambi L. Obstructive sleep apnea: brain structural changes and neurocognitive function before and after treatment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 May 15;183(10):1419-26. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201005-0693OC. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
PubMed 21037021Benedict RH, Cookfair D, Gavett R, Gunther M, Munschauer F, Garg N, Weinstock-Guttman B. Validity of the minimal assessment of cognitive function in multiple sclerosis (MACFIMS). J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006 Jul;12(4):549-58. doi: 10.1017/s1355617706060723.
PubMed 16981607Benedict RH, Fischer JS, Archibald CJ, Arnett PA, Beatty WW, Bobholz J, Chelune GJ, Fisk JD, Langdon DW, Caruso L, Foley F, LaRocca NG, Vowels L, Weinstein A, DeLuca J, Rao SM, Munschauer F. Minimal neuropsychological assessment of MS patients: a consensus approach. Clin Neuropsychol. 2002 Aug;16(3):381-97. doi: 10.1076/clin.16.3.381.13859.
PubMed 12607150Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, Fujihara K, Havrdova E, Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Lublin FD, Montalban X, O'Connor P, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Thompson AJ, Waubant E, Weinshenker B, Wolinsky JS. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011 Feb;69(2):292-302. doi: 10.1002/ana.22366.
PubMed 21387374Kroenke K, Strine TW, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Berry JT, Mokdad AH. The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):163-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.026. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
PubMed 18752852
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Sep 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Trial of Positive Airway Pressure Therapy to Treat Cognitive Dysfunction in MS Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02544373
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HUM00098738
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Keywords
- OSA, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Cognition, Cognitive Dysfunction, Memory, Positive Aiway Pressure, CPAP, MS
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 135 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MichiganUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Multiple Sclerosis Society
- Study start
- 12 Nov 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Jun 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 14 Sep 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objectives of this study are to determine the effects of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on cognitive function in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS); and to evaluate whether OSA treatment with positive airway pressure therapy could improve cognitive dysfunction in MS patients who have OSA.
Detailed description
Up to 70% of patients with MS suffer from cognitive dysfunction (difficulties with thinking, information processing, verbal expression, or memory). Cognitive dysfunction is one of the most disabling symptoms of MS, that can profoundly affect job performance, family responsibilities, and quality of life. While no treatments have been shown to improve cognitive dysfunction in MS, many patients have not been evaluated or treated for other common health problems that could be contributing to their cognitive dysfunction.
Up to 50% of MS patients also suffer from obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Obstructive sleep apnea is a common disorder in which the upper airway collapses during sleep, causing poor sleep quality and decreased oxygen levels in the blood. In patients without MS, OSA is a well-established cause of poor cognitive performance. Recent studies of non-MS patients also suggest that cognitive performance may improve with OSA treatment. Yet, despite the high number of MS patients with OSA, the relationship between OSA and cognitive performance, and the effects of OSA treatment on cognitive performance in MS, has not received sufficient study.
The objectives of this study are to determine the effects of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on cognitive function in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS); and to evaluate whether OSA treatment with positive airway pressure therapy could improve cognitive dysfunction in MS patients who also have OSA.
Interested participants with MS who screen positive on a commonly used screening tool used to detect those at high risk for OSA will be invited to participate. Consenting participants will have a baseline cognitive (memory and thinking) test to assess their cognitive function, and an overnight sleep study (polysomnogram, or PSG) to determine if they have obstructive sleep apnea. If the sleep study shows signs of sleep apnea, participants will be assigned treatment for their sleep apnea with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy, either immediately (Group 1), or 3 months after the baseline sleep study (Group 2). Groups will be assigned at random (like flipping a coin). There is a 2/3 chance that participants will be assigned to Group 1. PAP therapy is considered standard clinical care for OSA. It involves wearing an apparatus that includes a hose and a mask (that covers the nose, or nose and mouth), connected to a small machine that blows air into the airway during sleep. In order to determine which airway pressure most effectively treats an individual's sleep apnea, and what type of mask is needed, a separate sleep study known as an overnight "PAP titration study" will also be performed. This study is similar to a PSG but also involves fitting of various masks which are then hooked up to the individual and PAP machine to test the effectiveness of various PAP settings, and to determine which mask is most tolerable for the individual.
Participants will also receive repeat cognitive testing at 3 months to see if the immediate sleep apnea treatment group (Group 1) shows improvements memory and thinking, as compared to the standard care treatment group (Group 2), who will not start apnea treatment until after their repeat cognitive test. Participants will be compensated for their travel and time throughout the course of the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate PAP therapy (Group 1) | Active comparator | Device: PAP therapySubjects will receive PAP treatment for OSA as soon as possible after baseline PSG and repeat baseline cognitive testing 3 months after initiation of PAP therapy. PAP therapy is considered standard clinical care for OSA. It involves wearing an apparatus that includes a hose and a mask (that covers the nose, or nose and mouth), connected to a small machine that blows air into the airway during sleep. The degree of air pressure given depends on your apnea severity, and the supplied air pressure can be continuous or change with your breathing pattern (bilevel). |
| Standard Care PAP therapy (Group 2) | Other | Device: PAP therapySubjects will delay PAP treatment for 3 months following their baseline sleep study, and repeat their baseline cognitive testing prior to PAP treatment for sleep apnea. PAP therapy is considered standard clinical care for OSA. It involves wearing an apparatus that includes a hose and a mask (that covers the nose, or nose and mouth), connected to a small machine that blows air into the airway during sleep. The degree of air pressure given depends on your apnea severity, and the supplied air pressure can be continuous or change with your breathing pattern (bilevel). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Age of 18-70 years at screening
- Diagnosis of clinically definite MS
- Willingness to undergo in-lab baseline polysomnography (PSG) and positive airway pressure (PAP) titration (if needed)
- Willingness to undergo 2 separate 90-minute cognitive testing sessions
- Either one of the following:
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Physical, psychiatric or cognitive impairment that prevents informed consent, PSG, PAP use, or reliable longitudinal follow-up
- Cardiopulmonary conditions that may increase sleep apnea risk
- Current treatment, such as PAP, for obstructive or central sleep apnea
- History of surgical treatment for OSA
- Nervous system diseases other than MS that may predispose subjects to OSA (such as Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or recent stroke)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PAP therapyAlso: Positive airway pressure, CPAP, BiPAP, Continuous positive airway pressurePositive airway pressure treatment for obstructive sleep apnea | Device | Immediate PAP therapy (Group 1), Standard Care PAP therapy (Group 2) |
Primary outcome
Association Between Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Severity [as Measured by Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) e.g., Number of Apneic Events Per Hour of Sleep] and Baseline Performance on the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in MS Battery (MACFIMS)
Time frame: Participants had up to 3 weeks to complete both baseline cognitive testing and PSG
Bivariate associations between AHI measured with PSG, and baseline MACFIMS test results which include: * Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT): verbal fluency; * Judgement of Line Orientation test (JLO): visuospatial perception; * Brief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised Total (BVMT-R Total) and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised Delayed (BVMT-R Delayed): visual memory \& learning; * California Verbal Learning Test-II Total score (CVLT-II): verbal memory \& learning; * Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test-2 (PASAT-2), Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test-3 (PASAT-3) and Symbol Digit Modalities test (SDMT): memory, attention, processing speed. For each test higher scores indicate better cognitive performance. Beta coefficients were generated with multiple linear regression models, yielding the confidence intervals shown below.
Change From Baseline in Performance on the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in MS Battery (MACFIMS)
Time frame: baseline, 3 months
Mean change in scores on individual MACFIMS tests from baseline to month 3 cognitive testing, as calculated by Month 3 minus baseline score shown by treatment group. MACFIMS tests with score ranges (minimum-maximum) are listed here: * Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) 0 - no recognized upper limit; * Judgement of Line Orientation test (JLO) 0-34 based on scores adjusted for age and sex; * Brief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised Total (BVMT-R Total) 0-36; * Brief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised Delayed (BVMT-R Delayed), 0-12; * California Verbal Learning Test-II Total score (CVLT-II); (T scores necessary for analysis; 50=population mean; 10=SD); * Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test-2 (PASAT-2), 0-60; * Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test-3 (PASAT-3) 0-60; and * Symbol Digit Modalities test (SDMT) 0-110. For all measures, higher scores mean better performance, so based on subtracting 3 month values minus baseline, any positive numbers indicate improvement.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Sep 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 9658410Brassington JC, Marsh NV. Neuropsychological aspects of multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychol Rev. 1998 Jun;8(2):43-77. doi: 10.1023/a:1025621700003.
- Background: PubMed 9071639Diamond BJ, DeLuca J, Kim H, Kelley SM. The question of disproportionate impairments in visual and auditory information processing in multiple sclerosis. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997 Feb;19(1):34-42. doi: 10.1080/01688639708403834.
- Background: PubMed 8021305DeLuca J, Barbieri-Berger S, Johnson SK. The nature of memory impairments in multiple sclerosis: acquisition versus retrieval. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994 Apr;16(2):183-9. doi: 10.1080/01688639408402629.
- Background: PubMed 8800343Kujala P, Portin R, Ruutiainen J. Memory deficits and early cognitive deterioration in MS. Acta Neurol Scand. 1996 May;93(5):329-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1996.tb00005.x.
- Background: PubMed 2027484Rao SM, Leo GJ, Bernardin L, Unverzagt F. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology. 1991 May;41(5):685-91. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.5.685.
- Background: PubMed 2403789Peyser JM, Rao SM, LaRocca NG, Kaplan E. Guidelines for neuropsychological research in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 1990 Jan;47(1):94-7. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1990.00530010120030.
- Background: PubMed 7723961Beatty WW, Paul RH, Wilbanks SL, Hames KA, Blanco CR, Goodkin DE. Identifying multiple sclerosis patients with mild or global cognitive impairment using the Screening Examination for Cognitive Impairment (SEFCI). Neurology. 1995 Apr;45(4):718-23. doi: 10.1212/wnl.45.4.718.
- Background: PubMed 9071637Knight RG, Devereux RC, Godfrey HP. Psychosocial consequences of caring for a spouse with multiple sclerosis. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997 Feb;19(1):7-19. doi: 10.1080/01688639708403832.
- Background: PubMed 1823781Rao SM, Leo GJ, Ellington L, Nauertz T, Bernardin L, Unverzagt F. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. II. Impact on employment and social functioning. Neurology. 1991 May;41(5):692-6. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.5.692.
- Background: PubMed 18374010O'Brien AR, Chiaravalloti N, Goverover Y, Deluca J. Evidenced-based cognitive rehabilitation for persons with multiple sclerosis: a review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Apr;89(4):761-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.019.
- Background: PubMed 21037021Canessa N, Castronovo V, Cappa SF, Aloia MS, Marelli S, Falini A, Alemanno F, Ferini-Strambi L. Obstructive sleep apnea: brain structural changes and neurocognitive function before and after treatment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 May 15;183(10):1419-26. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201005-0693OC. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
- Background: PubMed 16981607Benedict RH, Cookfair D, Gavett R, Gunther M, Munschauer F, Garg N, Weinstock-Guttman B. Validity of the minimal assessment of cognitive function in multiple sclerosis (MACFIMS). J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006 Jul;12(4):549-58. doi: 10.1017/s1355617706060723.
Related trials for Multiple Sclerosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Rollover Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Ocrelizumab In Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Early Versus Late Ofatumumab (Kesimpta®) Use in Austrian RMS-Patients Over 2 Years
Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
RecruitingPhase 2
Efgartigimod for the Treatment of Acute Optic Neuritis
Optic Neuritis
RecruitingPhase 3
An Extension Study to Assess Impact of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) on Physical Function and Provide Continued Ocrelizumab Treatment
Multiple Sclerosis
Not yet recruiting
Neurogenetics and Multi-omics of Neuroinflammatory Diseases in Multiplex Families to Improve Patients Health
Multiple Sclerosis, Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tiffany Braley, MD, MS principal investigator
University of Michigan
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PAP therapy in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Sep 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Association Between Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Severity [as Measured by Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) e.g., Number of Apneic Events Per Hour of Sleep] and Baseline Performance on the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in MS Battery (MACFIMS) (time frame: Participants had up to 3 weeks to complete both baseline cognitive testing and PSG). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02544373, which also lists 26 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Sep 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.