AzTrials
AzTrials

Subjets Requiring a ColonoscopyPhase 4B-CLEANNCT02547571

The Bowel CLEAnsing: A National Initiative

A Phase 4 study testing High volume PEG split-dose, Low volume PEG split-dose and High volume PEG non split, day before in people with Subjets Requiring a Colonoscopy, run by Alan Barkun at 10 sites in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare diet, type of bowel preparation and time of colonoscopy to determine if one method is better than the other and, if they are the same, identify the one which is the most convenient for the patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Subjets Requiring a Colonoscopy
What is being tested?
High volume PEG split-dose, Low volume PEG split-dose and High volume PEG non split, day before
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
3,476 participants
Where
10 sitesCanada
Study dates
Mar 2016to Sep 2018
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Outpatients
  • 18 years or older
  • Able to comprehend the trial
  • Have an indication for full colonoscopy

Who cannot join

  • Subjects are excluded from enrollment into the study if any of the following are present:
  • General exclusion criteria:
  • Subject refusal
  • Previous bowel preparation in the last 14 days
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Reduced mobility
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Medical/Endoscopic exclusion criteria:
  • Suspected or diagnosed with bowel obstruction
  • Any colonic surgery
  • Toxic megacolon
  • Ileus
  • Ischemic colitis
  • Decompensated heart failure
  • Severe acute renal failure
  • Severe liver disease
  • Severe electrolyte imbalance

Trial locations and contacts

10 sites in 1 country.

10 sites in 1 country

Canada10 sites
  • Forzani & MacPhail Colon Cancer Screening Centre

    Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6

  • University of Alberta Hospital

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2X8

  • QEII HSC

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9

  • Western University

    London, Ontario, N6A 5W9

  • CHUM

    Montreal, Quebec, H2W 2J3

  • McGill University Health Centre

    Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4

  • The Ottawa Hospital

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 1A2

  • Hôpital St-Sacrement, CHU de Québec-Université Laval

    Québec, G1S 4L8

  • St. Paul's Hospital

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 2K5

  • Health Sciences center and St. Boniface Hospital

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2H 2A6

Other trials in Canada

About this study

The purpose of this study is to compare diet, type of bowel preparation and time of colonoscopy to determine if one method is better than the other and, if they are the same, identify the one which is the most convenient for the patients.

Read the detailed description

The objective of the current proposed trial is thus to compare the cleanliness achieved with PEG high-volume (2L+2L) split-dose versus PEG (1L+1L)+Bisacodyl low-volume split-dose, or PEG high volume (4L) non-split day before versus PEG low volume (2L) non-split same day preparation, according to time of endoscopy (early or later), as well as assess the role of diet (low residue or clear liquid diet) according to these different Canadian outpatient preparation regimens.

Being tested
High volume PEG split-dose, Low volume PEG split-dose, High volume PEG non split, day before, Low volume PEG non split, same day, Clear liquid diet
Keywords
Outpatient

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • High volume PEG split-doseDrug

    Also called Colyte® or PegLyte®

    Colyte® or PegLyte® will be provided to the subject who will be asked to drink 2L of the preparation starting at 7:00 PM the day before the procedure at a rate of 240 mL every 10 minutes until completed. The second dose of 2L of preparation will be taken the morning of the colonoscopy starting 4-5 hours prior to the planned procedural time at a rate of 240 mL every 10 minutes until completed.

  • Low volume PEG split-doseDrug

    Also called Bi-PegLyte®

    Bi-PegLyte® will be provided to the subject who will be asked to ingest 3 tabs of Bisacodyl 5 mg (total 15 mg) at 2:00 PM the day before the procedure. After the first bowel movement, or if there is no bowel movement within 6 hours of taking the Bisacodyl tablets, the subject will be asked to drink 1L of the solution at a rate of 240 mL every 10 minutes until the solution is completed. The second dose of 1L of preparation will be taken the morning of the colonoscopy starting 4-5 hours prior to the procedure at a rate of 240 mL every 10 minutes. Use of antacids will not be permitted within one hour of taking bisacodyl.

  • High volume PEG non split, day beforeDrug

    Also called Colyte® or PegLyte®

    Colyte® or PegLyte® will be provided to the subject who will be asked to drink 4L of preparation starting at 6:00 PM the day before the procedure, at a rate of 240 mL every 10 minutes until completed.

  • Low volume PEG non split, same dayDrug

    Also called Bi-PegLyte®

    Bi-PegLyte® will be provided to the subject, who will be asked to ingest 3 tabs of Bisacodyl 5 mg (total 15 mg) at 2:00 PM the day before the procedure and will drink 2L of preparation the morning of the colonoscopy starting 4 hours prior to the procedure at a rate of 240 mL every 10 minutes, until completed. Use of antacids will not be permitted within one hour of taking Bisacodyl.

  • Clear liquid dietOther

  • Low residue dietOther

  • Early colonoscopy (stratified)Other

    "Early" appointments: 7:30 AM to 10h30 AM

  • Later colonoscopy (stratified)Other

    "Later" appointments: 10:30 AM to 4:30 PM.

Study groups in NCT02547571
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1) Early colonoscopy; 2) High-dose, split-dose; 3)Clear liquidActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: High volume PEG split-dose; Other: Clear liquid diet; Other: Early colonoscopy (stratified)
1) Early colonoscopy; 2) High-dose, split-dose; 3)Low residueActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: High volume PEG split-dose; Other: Low residue diet; Other: Early colonoscopy (stratified)
1) Early colonoscopy; 2) Low volume split-dose; 3)Clear liquidActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Low volume PEG split-dose; Other: Clear liquid diet; Other: Early colonoscopy (stratified)
1) Early colonoscopy; 2) Low volume split-dose; 3)Low residueActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Low volume PEG split-dose; Other: Low residue diet; Other: Early colonoscopy (stratified)
1) Early colonoscopy; 2) High-dose, day before; 3)Clear liquidActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: High volume PEG non split, day before; Other: Clear liquid diet; Other: Early colonoscopy (stratified)
1) Early colonoscopy; 2) High-dose, day before; 3)Low residueActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: High volume PEG non split, day before; Other: Low residue diet; Other: Early colonoscopy (stratified)
1) Later colonoscopy; 2) High-dose, split-dose; 3)Clear liquidActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: High volume PEG split-dose; Other: Clear liquid diet; Other: Later colonoscopy (stratified)
1) Later colonoscopy; 2) High-dose, split-dose; 3)Low residueActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: High volume PEG split-dose; Other: Low residue diet; Other: Later colonoscopy (stratified)
1) Later colonoscopy; 2) Low volume split-dose; 3)Clear liquidActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Low volume PEG split-dose; Other: Clear liquid diet; Other: Later colonoscopy (stratified)
1) Later colonoscopy; 2) Low volume split-dose; 3)Low residueActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Low volume PEG split-dose; Other: Low residue diet; Other: Later colonoscopy (stratified)
1) Later colonoscopy; 2) Low volume day before; 3)Clear liquidActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Low volume PEG non split, same day; Other: Clear liquid diet; Other: Later colonoscopy (stratified)
1) Later colonoscopy; 2) Low volume day before; 3)Low residueActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Low volume PEG non split, same day; Other: Low residue diet; Other: Later colonoscopy (stratified)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Bowel cleansing according to the Boston Scale

    Measured: Day of colonoscopy

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Subject willingness to repeat the preparation (survey)

    Measured: Day of colonoscopy

  2. Withdrawal time and total procedural time

    Measured: Day of colonoscopy

  3. Cecal or ileal intubation rate for colonoscopies

    Measured: Day of colonoscopy

  4. Polyp detection and polypectomy rate

    Measured: Day of colonoscopy

  5. Right colon polyp detection rate

    Measured: Day of colonoscopy

  6. Specific lesional rates identified according to pathology

    Measured: up to 30 days

  7. % of preparation taken by the subject

    Measured: Day of colonoscopy

  8. Subject travel time to endoscopy unit (hrs)

    Measured: Day of colonoscopy

  9. Incontinence

    Measured: Day of colonoscopy

  10. Fecal Immunochemical Test value

    Measured: Day of colonoscopy

  11. Montreal score compared to BBPS

    Measured: Day of colonoscopy

  12. Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scores compared to BBPS

    Measured: Day of colonoscopy

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Sep 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2016
  3. Primary completionSep 2018
  4. Study completionSep 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
3,476 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02547571
Sponsor's protocol ID
V2015-001
Acronym
B-CLEAN
Status last verified
Sep 2018
First submitted
1 Sep 2015
Last updated
13 Sep 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Assal C, Watson PY. Angioedema as a hypersensitivity reaction to polyethylene glycol oral electrolyte solution. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Aug;64(2):294-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.02.008. Epub 2006 May 19. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16860094
  • Brahmania M, Ou G, Bressler B, Ko HK, Lam E, Telford J, Enns R. 2 L versus 4 L of PEG3350 + electrolytes for outpatient colonic preparation: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):408-416.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.035. Epub 2013 Oct 24.

    PubMed 24206747
  • Bucci C, Rotondano G, Hassan C, Rea M, Bianco MA, Cipolletta L, Ciacci C, Marmo R. Optimal bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: split the dose! A series of meta-analyses of controlled studies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Oct;80(4):566-576.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.05.320. Epub 2014 Jul 19.

    PubMed 25053529
  • Cesaro P, Hassan C, Spada C, Petruzziello L, Vitale G, Costamagna G. A new low-volume isosmotic polyethylene glycol solution plus bisacodyl versus split-dose 4 L polyethylene glycol for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial. Dig Liver Dis. 2013 Jan;45(1):23-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2012.07.011. Epub 2012 Aug 21.

    PubMed 22917636
  • Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.

    PubMed 3558716
  • Chorev N, Chadad B, Segal N, Shemesh I, Mor M, Plaut S, Fraser G, Geller A, Gal E, Niv Y. Preparation for colonoscopy in hospitalized patients. Dig Dis Sci. 2007 Mar;52(3):835-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-006-9591-5.

    PubMed 17253131
  • Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, Baron TH, Hutter MM, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Nemcek A Jr, Petersen BT, Petrini JL, Pike IM, Rabeneck L, Romagnuolo J, Vargo JJ. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):446-54. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027. No abstract available.

    PubMed 20189503
  • de Leone A, Tamayo D, Fiori G, Ravizza D, Trovato C, De Roberto G, Fazzini L, Dal Fante M, Crosta C. Same-day 2-L PEG-citrate-simethicone plus bisacodyl vs split 4-L PEG: Bowel cleansing for late-morning colonoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Sep 16;5(9):433-9. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i9.433.

    PubMed 24044042
  • El Sayed AM, Kanafani ZA, Mourad FH, Soweid AM, Barada KA, Adorian CS, Nasreddine WA, Sharara AI. A randomized single-blind trial of whole versus split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jul;58(1):36-40. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.318.

    PubMed 12838218
  • Eun CS, Han DS, Hyun YS, Bae JH, Park HS, Kim TY, Jeon YC, Sohn JH. The timing of bowel preparation is more important than the timing of colonoscopy in determining the quality of bowel cleansing. Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Feb;56(2):539-44. doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1457-1. Epub 2010 Nov 2.

    PubMed 21042853
  • Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Vader JP. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Mar;61(3):378-84. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02776-2.

    PubMed 15758907
  • Hangartner PJ, Munch R, Meier J, Ammann R, Buhler H. Comparison of three colon cleansing methods: evaluation of a randomized clinical trial with 300 ambulatory patients. Endoscopy. 1989 Nov;21(6):272-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1012967.

    PubMed 2693078
  • Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jul;58(1):76-9. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.294.

    PubMed 12838225
  • Hassan C, Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF, Polkowski M, Rembacken B, Saunders B, Benamouzig R, Holme O, Green S, Kuiper T, Marmo R, Omar M, Petruzziello L, Spada C, Zullo A, Dumonceau JM; European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy. 2013;45(2):142-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326186. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

    PubMed 23335011
  • Hendry PO, Jenkins JT, Diament RH. The impact of poor bowel preparation on colonoscopy: a prospective single centre study of 10,571 colonoscopies. Colorectal Dis. 2007 Oct;9(8):745-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01220.x. Epub 2007 Mar 7.

    PubMed 17477852

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing High volume PEG split-dose, Low volume PEG split-dose and High volume PEG non split, day before in people with Subjets Requiring a Colonoscopy, run by Alan Barkun at 10 sites in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 10 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Bowel cleansing according to the Boston Scale (time frame: Day of colonoscopy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02547571, which also lists 46 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in