Diabetic Macular OedemaADDENDUMNCT02554747
Aflibercept anD navigateD vErsus coNvensional Laser in Diabetic macUlar edeMa
A study testing Navigated laser and Conventional laser in people with Diabetic Macular Oedema, run by Odense University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Diabetic macular edema (DME) in diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of visual impairment among the 300,000 Danish patients with diabetes (DM) and will in time affect 29% of patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Macular Oedema
- What is being tested?
- Navigated laser and Conventional laser
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 48 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Oct 2015to Nov 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diabetes mellitus
- Clinically significant macular edema in the study eye.
- Central retinal thickness > 300 μm in the study eye.
- Best corrected visual acuity 35-80 ETDRS letters (0.10-0.80 Snellen equivalent) in the study eye.
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy.
- Active proliferative diabetic retinopathy in the study eye.
- History of cataract surgery, YAG capsulotomy, vitrectomy or retinal laser treatment in the study eye within 4 months prior to randomization.
- Ocular condition(s) in the study eye that in the opinion of the investigator would prevent improvement of visual acuity.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site
Research Unit of Ophthalmology, Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Ophthalmology, Odense University Hospital.
Odense, Fyn, 5000
About this study
Diabetic macular edema (DME) in diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of visual impairment among the 300,000 Danish patients with diabetes (DM) and will in time affect 29% of patients. Because of DME, 550 intravitreal injections were given at Odense University Hospital in 2014 with medicine expenses approximating 3.3 million DKK. With an increasing prevalence of diabetes, the number is expected to rise significantly for the years to come.
The investigators hypothesize that combination therapy with intravitreal aflibercept and a new computer navigated photocoagulations system (Navilas®) leads to a decreased need for intravitreal injections.
Read more
Further, the investigators wish to identify retinal risk markers for DME treatment outcome to assist individualized treatment planning. The evaluation of the baseline level of macular ischemia as marker of successful treatment outcome is of particular interest as this is still highly debatable and may prove a significant prognostic factor of anatomical and functional outcome to anti-VEGF treatment.
The ADDENDUM study (four-year part-time PhD study) is a 12-month prospective randomized 1:1 study to compare intravitreal aflibercept and Navilas® laser (Group A) with intravitreal aflibercept and conventional Pascal laser (Group B) in the treatment of DME.
Eligibility criteria: DM, age 18-99, clinically significant macular edema, central retinal thickness > 300 μm, best corrected visual acuity 35-75 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters.
The investigators believe that this study holds the potential to set precedent for a new gold standard of DME-treatment with increased treatment effect, reduced risks and a more cost-effective approach.
Read the detailed description
Introduction:
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most common complication among the 300,000 Danish patients with diabetes. Amongst those with diabetes, diabetic macular edema (DME) is a leading cause of visual impairment and will in time affect 29% of all patients.
It was established by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) that focal/grid laser photocoagulation reduces the risk of visual loss in patients with DME but with a small likelihood of visual improvement. In recent years intravitreal anti-VEGF agents like bevacizumab, ranibizumab and aflibercept have consistently demonstrated efficacy and visual improvement in DME-treatment. However, a high number of injections is needed per patient to achieve sustainable visual improvement. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net) showed, that the median number of intravitreal ranibizumab injections was 9 in the first and 3 in the second year.
The burden of intravitreal injections is a concern and it is substantial both for patients as well as the health care system. Because of DME, 550 intravitreal injections were given at Odense University Hospital in 2014. The medicine expenses of this approximate 3.3 million DKK and with an increasing prevalence of diabetes the number is expected to rise significantly for the years to come.
This calls for initiatives like a more cost-effective treatment and a better understanding of underlying predictors of successful treatment in order to improve and individualize treatment.
Navilas®(OD-OS GmbH, Teltow, Germany) is a navigated laser photocoagulation system that combines fluorescein angiography with image stabilization and tracking. This increases the capability to localize and then subsequently treat leaking microaneurysms. The ability to preplan and deliver planned spots in an automatic mode led to the observation that navigated laser treatment reduces the need for intravitreal injections of bevacizumab and ranibizumab. In a 12-month prospective study of patients with center-involving DME Liegl et al compared navigated laser and ranibizumab with ranibizumab monotherapy. All patients initially received 3 monthly ranibizumab injections and additional injections pro re nata. In addition, patients in the combination group received navigated laser photocoagulation after the loading phase. The study demonstrated a similar improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) but a significant lower need for additional intravitreal injections (35% vs. 84%, p<0.001) as well as a lower number of additional injections in the combination group (mean 0.9 vs. 3.9, p<0.001).
Aflibercept replaced ranibizumab as first-choice treatment in AMD in Denmark, while in DME-treatment results indicate a lower number of intravitreal injections required as well as a greater improvement in visual acuity, especially amongst those with worst visual acuity at baseline, as compared to ranibizumab. However, the combination of aflibercept and navigated laser therapy so far has not been tested in DME. In present standard regime of DME-treatment, both aflibercept and ranibizumab are prescribed as drugs of first.
Features of the geometrical pattern of retinal vascular system have consistently been correlated to diabetic retinopathy (DR). In earlier studies the investigators demonstrated that retinal vascular diameter and fractal dimension were independently able to predict long-term microvascular complications in diabetes (proliferative DR, nephropathy and neuropathy). In DME, the investigators reported that laser photocoagulation was associated with a lower macular retinal vascular diameter, possibly due to autoregulated vascular narrowing given the lower oxygen demand after laser therapy. The investigators speculate that changes in retinal vascular geometry may be used as a measure of treatment response but this has not been tested in any prospective studies.
Retinal vessel oxygen saturation is another non-invasive measurement of retinal function. Oxymap T1 (Oxymap, Reykjavik, Iceland) has made it possible to evaluate the metabolic changes in the retina. It has been demonstrated by Jørgensen et al that patients with DME have a higher oxygen saturation in retinal venules, but the treatment response on retinal vessel oxygen saturation is still unknown.
The effect of macular ischemia on DME is still debatable. Macular ischemia and its impact on the functional and anatomical outcome after intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF have only been studied in a few short-term studies. In a case-control study, Douvali et al demonstrated that after six months in patients treated with ranibizumab for DME there was a negative functional outcome for those who had macular ischemia at baseline as compared to those who were non-ischemic. However, the effect of macular ischemia on the functional and anatomical outcome of DME-treatment has not been demonstrated in aflibercept-treatment.
Primary goals:
In a randomized 12-months prospective 1:1 study of patients with diabetic macular edema, ADDENDUM aims to (1) examine the treatment response of intravitreal aflibercept and navigated laser as compared to intravitreal aflibercept and conventional Pascal laser, (2) identify non-invasive retinal risk factors (retinal vessel diameter, fractal dimension, and oxygen saturation) for successful treatment outcome, and (3) evaluate baseline level of macular ischemia as marker of successful treatment outcome.
Hypothesis:
- Combination therapy with intravitreal aflibercept and navigated laser leads to a decreased need for intravitreal injections.
- Non-invasive retinal markers make it possible to predict treatment response in patients with DME. Laser treatment leads to lower retinal vascular diameters, lower fractal dimensions and higher retinal oxygen saturation in patients with a successful treatment outcome (irrespectively of treatment group).
- The level of macular ischemia at baseline is negatively correlated with functional and anatomical outcome in patients treated with aflibercept for DME (irrespectively of treatment group).
Trial design:
Period:
1 September 2015 - 31 August 2019
Setup:
12-month randomized prospective 1:1 study to compare intravitreal aflibercept and navigated Navilas® laser (group A, n=24) with intravitreal aflibercept and conventional Pascal laser (group B, n=24).
Plan:
- Patients will be recruited in the Region of Southern Denmark and included in the study based on a clinical examination. Patients will be randomized at baseline (BL). Patients with both eyes eligible will participate with one eye in each group.
- Patients will receive intravitreal treatment at month (M) 0, 1 and 2 (see Treatment scheme). At M3 laser treatment will be performed if possible as determined by the examiner.
- From M4 patients will then be followed monthly with additional intravitreal injections given pro re nata.
- Criteria for re-treatment will be: 1. Central retinal thickness > 20% from lowest measurement. 2. Loss in BCVA>5 letters as compared to baseline.
- Eyes not suitable for laser treatment by M3 will continue treatment in a monthly pro re nata intravitreal regimen. If laser has not been given by the end of M5 patients will be withdrawn from the study.
Examination:
- Systemic biomarkers: Age, type of diabetes, duration of diabetes, health history, smoking status, blood pressure, body mass index, hemoglobin A1c, glomerular filtration rate, serum creatinine (BL).
- Diabetes therapy (BL, M12).
- ETDRS BCVA measurement (BL, M0-M12).
- Intraocular pressure (BL, M12).
- Cataract LOCS grading.
- Heidelberg fluorescein angiography, incl. measurement of area of foveal avascular zone [FAZ] (BL, M3, M12).
- Topcon 3D OCT-2000 spectral domain OCT (BL, M0-M12).
- Retinal vessel geometry measurements (BL, M3, M6, M12).
- Oxymap retinal oximetry measurement (BL, M3, M6, M12).
- Optos widefield retinal imaging (BL, M3, M6, M12).
Primary endpoint:
- Percentage of eyes that received additional aflibercept injections after laser at month 12 in group A and B (Paper I).
Secondary endpoints:
- Number of additional aflibercept injections after laser at month 12 in group A and B (Paper I).
- Change in ETDRS visual acuity from baseline to month 12 in group A and B (Paper I).
- Change in global and macular retinal vessel geometric markers (retinal vascular diameter and fractal dimension) from baseline to month 12 in group A and B (Paper II).
- Change in global and macular oxygen saturation from baseline to month 12 in group A and B (Paper II).
- Evaluation of non-invasive retinal risk factors (retinal vascular geometric markers and oxygen saturation) for successful treatment outcome at month 12 (in multiple logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex, duration of diabetes, smoking, blood pressure, body mass index, hemoglobin A1c and renal markers) (Paper II).
- Change in level of macular ischemia (area of FAZ) from baseline to month 12 in group A and B (Paper III).
- Evaluation of baseline area of FAZ as marker of successful treatment outcome at month 12 (in multiple logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex, duration of diabetes, smoking, blood pressure, body mass index, hemoglobin A1c and renal markers) (Paper III).
Clinical implication and scientific outcome:
Combination therapy with intravitreal aflibercept and navigated laser photocoagulation is likely to be the future in DME-treatment. As compared to intravitreal monotherapy, the fewer injections and lower cost meets the demand of the patients as well as those of society. Identification of retinal risk markers for DME treatment outcome offers an attractive assistance in the guidance of individualized treatment planning.
The present study will be performed at a PhD Study at University of Southern Denmark. Three papers in high-ranking international peer-reviewed journals have been planned. All results will be published irrespective positive or negative outcome.
Facilities:
A research laboratory has been established at the Department of Ophthalmology, Odense University Hospital. Necessary equipment for the study as well as office facilities will be available at the department. Oxymap T1, Pascal laser, Navilas® laser and software for retinal vascular measurement analysis (IVAN image analysis software and Singapore Institute Vessel Assessment-Fractal version 1.0) will be available. Rental of a Topcon 3D OCT-2000 will be included in the budget.
Statistical calculations:
The primary endpoint of the present study will be the percentage of eyes that will need additional intravitreal injections after laser.
Sample size calculations were based on the study by Liegl et al that evaluated the effect of combined intravitreal ranibizumab and navigated laser treatment versus ranibizumab monotherapy in DME. In that study additional injections needed was 35% and 85%, respectively. Given a probability level of 0.05 and a statistical power level of 90%, a study size of 19 patients in each group will be needed in the present study. In order to compensate for a 20% drop-out rate, 24 patients will be included in each group.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Macular Oedema
- Being tested
- Navigated laser, Conventional laser
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Navigated laserDevice
Aflibercept, Navilas®
Conventional laserDevice
Aflibercept, Pascal
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Navigated laser | Experimental | Aflibercept, Navilas® Receives: Device: Navigated laser |
| Conventional laser | Active comparator | Aflibercept, Pascal Receives: Device: Conventional laser |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of eyes that received additional aflibercept injections after laser at month 12 in group A and B
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (9)
Number of additional aflibercept injections after laser at month 12 in group A and B
Measured: 1 year
Change in ETDRS visual acuity from baseline to month 12 in group A and B
Measured: 1 year
Change in global retinal vessel geometric markers from baseline to month 12 in group A and B
Measured: 1 year
Change in macular retinal vessel geometric markers from baseline to month 12 in group A and B
Measured: 1 year
Change in global oxygen saturation from baseline to month 12 in group A and B
Measured: 1 year
Change in macular oxygen saturation from baseline to month 12 in group A and B
Measured: 1 year
Evaluation of non-invasive retinal risk factors (retinal vascular geometric markers and oxygen saturation) for successful treatment outcome at month 12
Measured: 1 year
Change in level of macular ischemia (area of foveal avascular zone (FAZ)) from baseline to month 12 in group A and B
Measured: 1 year
Evaluation of baseline area of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) as marker of successful treatment outcome at month 12
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2015
- Primary completionDec 2017
- Study completionNov 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetic Macular OedemaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Odense University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Søren Leer Blindbæk, Odense University Hospital
- Investigators
- Søren Leer Blindbæk, MD, Principal investigator, Research Unit of Ophthalmology, Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark and Department of Ophthalmology, Odense University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02554747
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SDUSF-2015-21-(129)
- Other IDs
- S-20150077
- Acronym
- ADDENDUM
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 11 Sep 2015
- Last updated
- 19 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: A minimum of 3 pier reviewed articles. All results will be published wether positive or negative.
Publications
Grauslund J, Green A, Sjolie AK. Prevalence and 25 year incidence of proliferative retinopathy among Danish type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetologia. 2009 Sep;52(9):1829-35. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1450-4. Epub 2009 Jul 12.
PubMed 19593541Klein R, Knudtson MD, Lee KE, Gangnon R, Klein BE. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy XXIII: the twenty-five-year incidence of macular edema in persons with type 1 diabetes. Ophthalmology. 2009 Mar;116(3):497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.10.016. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
PubMed 19167079Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 9. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology. 1991 May;98(5 Suppl):766-85.
PubMed 2062512Rajendram R, Fraser-Bell S, Kaines A, Michaelides M, Hamilton RD, Esposti SD, Peto T, Egan C, Bunce C, Leslie RD, Hykin PG. A 2-year prospective randomized controlled trial of intravitreal bevacizumab or laser therapy (BOLT) in the management of diabetic macular edema: 24-month data: report 3. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Aug;130(8):972-9. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.393.
PubMed 22491395Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network; Elman MJ, Aiello LP, Beck RW, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Edwards AR, Ferris FL 3rd, Friedman SM, Glassman AR, Miller KM, Scott IU, Stockdale CR, Sun JK. Randomized trial evaluating ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2010 Jun;117(6):1064-1077.e35. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.031. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
PubMed 20427088Do DV, Nguyen QD, Boyer D, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Brown DM, Vitti R, Berliner AJ, Gao B, Zeitz O, Ruckert R, Schmelter T, Sandbrink R, Heier JS; da Vinci Study Group. One-year outcomes of the da Vinci Study of VEGF Trap-Eye in eyes with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2012 Aug;119(8):1658-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.010. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
PubMed 22537617Neubauer AS, Langer J, Liegl R, Haritoglou C, Wolf A, Kozak I, Seidensticker F, Ulbig M, Freeman WR, Kampik A, Kernt M. Navigated macular laser decreases retreatment rate for diabetic macular edema: a comparison with conventional macular laser. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:121-8. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S38559. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
PubMed 23345966Barteselli G, Kozak I, El-Emam S, Chhablani J, Cortes MA, Freeman WR. 12-month results of the standardised combination therapy for diabetic macular oedema: intravitreal bevacizumab and navigated retinal photocoagulation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;98(8):1036-41. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304488. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
PubMed 24723616Liegl R, Langer J, Seidensticker F, Reznicek L, Haritoglou C, Ulbig MW, Neubauer AS, Kampik A, Kernt M. Comparative evaluation of combined navigated laser photocoagulation and intravitreal ranibizumab in the treatment of diabetic macular edema. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 26;9(12):e113981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113981. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25541960Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network; Wells JA, Glassman AR, Ayala AR, Jampol LM, Aiello LP, Antoszyk AN, Arnold-Bush B, Baker CW, Bressler NM, Browning DJ, Elman MJ, Ferris FL, Friedman SM, Melia M, Pieramici DJ, Sun JK, Beck RW. Aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema. N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 26;372(13):1193-203. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414264. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
PubMed 25692915Broe R, Rasmussen ML, Frydkjaer-Olsen U, Olsen BS, Mortensen HB, Hodgson L, Wong TY, Peto T, Grauslund J. Retinal vessel calibers predict long-term microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes: the Danish Cohort of Pediatric Diabetes 1987 (DCPD1987). Diabetes. 2014 Nov;63(11):3906-14. doi: 10.2337/db14-0227. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
PubMed 24914239Broe R, Rasmussen ML, Frydkjaer-Olsen U, Olsen BS, Mortensen HB, Peto T, Grauslund J. Retinal vascular fractals predict long-term microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes mellitus: the Danish Cohort of Pediatric Diabetes 1987 (DCPD1987). Diabetologia. 2014 Oct;57(10):2215-21. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3317-6. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
PubMed 24981770Lundberg K, Kawasaki R, Sjolie AK, Wong TY, Grauslund J. Localized changes in retinal vessel caliber after focal/grid laser treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema: a measure of treatment response? Retina. 2013 Nov-Dec;33(10):2089-95. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182891dda.
PubMed 23514802Jorgensen CM, Hardarson SH, Bek T. The oxygen saturation in retinal vessels from diabetic patients depends on the severity and type of vision-threatening retinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;92(1):34-9. doi: 10.1111/aos.12283. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
PubMed 24330421Neubauer AS, Kook D, Haritoglou C, Priglinger SG, Kampik A, Ulbig MW, Ceklic L. Bevacizumab and retinal ischemia. Ophthalmology. 2007 Nov;114(11):2096. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.05.057. No abstract available.
PubMed 17980746
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Aflibercept anD navigateD vErsus coNvensional Laser in Diabetic macUlar edeMa
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02554747
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ADDENDUM / SDUSF-2015-21-(129)
- Conditions
- Diabetic Macular Oedema
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
- Study start
- Oct 2015
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Diabetic macular edema (DME) in diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of visual impairment among the 300,000 Danish patients with diabetes (DM) and will in time affect 29% of patients. Because of DME, 550 intravitreal injections were given at Odense University Hospital in 2014 with medicine expenses approximating 3.3 million DKK. With an increasing prevalence of diabetes, the number is expected to rise significantly for the years to come.
The investigators hypothesize that combination therapy with intravitreal aflibercept and a new computer navigated photocoagulations system (Navilas®) leads to a decreased need for intravitreal injections.
Further, the investigators wish to identify retinal risk markers for DME treatment outcome to assist individualized treatment planning. The evaluation of the baseline level of macular ischemia as marker of successful treatment outcome is of particular interest as this is still highly debatable and may prove a significant prognostic factor of anatomical and functional outcome to anti-VEGF treatment.
The ADDENDUM study (four-year part-time PhD study) is a 12-month prospective randomized 1:1 study to compare intravitreal aflibercept and Navilas® laser (Group A) with intravitreal aflibercept and conventional Pascal laser (Group B) in the treatment of DME.
Eligibility criteria: DM, age 18-99, clinically significant macular edema, central retinal thickness > 300 μm, best corrected visual acuity 35-75 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters.
The investigators believe that this study holds the potential to set precedent for a new gold standard of DME-treatment with increased treatment effect, reduced risks and a more cost-effective approach.
Detailed description
Introduction:
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most common complication among the 300,000 Danish patients with diabetes. Amongst those with diabetes, diabetic macular edema (DME) is a leading cause of visual impairment and will in time affect 29% of all patients.
It was established by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) that focal/grid laser photocoagulation reduces the risk of visual loss in patients with DME but with a small likelihood of visual improvement. In recent years intravitreal anti-VEGF agents like bevacizumab, ranibizumab and aflibercept have consistently demonstrated efficacy and visual improvement in DME-treatment. However, a high number of injections is needed per patient to achieve sustainable visual improvement. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net) showed, that the median number of intravitreal ranibizumab injections was 9 in the first and 3 in the second year.
The burden of intravitreal injections is a concern and it is substantial both for patients as well as the health care system. Because of DME, 550 intravitreal injections were given at Odense University Hospital in 2014. The medicine expenses of this approximate 3.3 million DKK and with an increasing prevalence of diabetes the number is expected to rise significantly for the years to come.
This calls for initiatives like a more cost-effective treatment and a better understanding of underlying predictors of successful treatment in order to improve and individualize treatment.
Navilas®(OD-OS GmbH, Teltow, Germany) is a navigated laser photocoagulation system that combines fluorescein angiography with image stabilization and tracking. This increases the capability to localize and then subsequently treat leaking microaneurysms. The ability to preplan and deliver planned spots in an automatic mode led to the observation that navigated laser treatment reduces the need for intravitreal injections of bevacizumab and ranibizumab. In a 12-month prospective study of patients with center-involving DME Liegl et al compared navigated laser and ranibizumab with ranibizumab monotherapy. All patients initially received 3 monthly ranibizumab injections and additional injections pro re nata. In addition, patients in the combination group received navigated laser photocoagulation after the loading phase. The study demonstrated a similar improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) but a significant lower need for additional intravitreal injections (35% vs. 84%, p<0.001) as well as a lower number of additional injections in the combination group (mean 0.9 vs. 3.9, p<0.001).
Aflibercept replaced ranibizumab as first-choice treatment in AMD in Denmark, while in DME-treatment results indicate a lower number of intravitreal injections required as well as a greater improvement in visual acuity, especially amongst those with worst visual acuity at baseline, as compared to ranibizumab. However, the combination of aflibercept and navigated laser therapy so far has not been tested in DME. In present standard regime of DME-treatment, both aflibercept and ranibizumab are prescribed as drugs of first.
Features of the geometrical pattern of retinal vascular system have consistently been correlated to diabetic retinopathy (DR). In earlier studies the investigators demonstrated that retinal vascular diameter and fractal dimension were independently able to predict long-term microvascular complications in diabetes (proliferative DR, nephropathy and neuropathy). In DME, the investigators reported that laser photocoagulation was associated with a lower macular retinal vascular diameter, possibly due to autoregulated vascular narrowing given the lower oxygen demand after laser therapy. The investigators speculate that changes in retinal vascular geometry may be used as a measure of treatment response but this has not been tested in any prospective studies.
Retinal vessel oxygen saturation is another non-invasive measurement of retinal function. Oxymap T1 (Oxymap, Reykjavik, Iceland) has made it possible to evaluate the metabolic changes in the retina. It has been demonstrated by Jørgensen et al that patients with DME have a higher oxygen saturation in retinal venules, but the treatment response on retinal vessel oxygen saturation is still unknown.
The effect of macular ischemia on DME is still debatable. Macular ischemia and its impact on the functional and anatomical outcome after intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF have only been studied in a few short-term studies. In a case-control study, Douvali et al demonstrated that after six months in patients treated with ranibizumab for DME there was a negative functional outcome for those who had macular ischemia at baseline as compared to those who were non-ischemic. However, the effect of macular ischemia on the functional and anatomical outcome of DME-treatment has not been demonstrated in aflibercept-treatment.
Primary goals:
In a randomized 12-months prospective 1:1 study of patients with diabetic macular edema, ADDENDUM aims to (1) examine the treatment response of intravitreal aflibercept and navigated laser as compared to intravitreal aflibercept and conventional Pascal laser, (2) identify non-invasive retinal risk factors (retinal vessel diameter, fractal dimension, and oxygen saturation) for successful treatment outcome, and (3) evaluate baseline level of macular ischemia as marker of successful treatment outcome.
Hypothesis:
- Combination therapy with intravitreal aflibercept and navigated laser leads to a decreased need for intravitreal injections.
- Non-invasive retinal markers make it possible to predict treatment response in patients with DME. Laser treatment leads to lower retinal vascular diameters, lower fractal dimensions and higher retinal oxygen saturation in patients with a successful treatment outcome (irrespectively of treatment group).
- The level of macular ischemia at baseline is negatively correlated with functional and anatomical outcome in patients treated with aflibercept for DME (irrespectively of treatment group).
Trial design:
Period:
1 September 2015 - 31 August 2019
Setup:
12-month randomized prospective 1:1 study to compare intravitreal aflibercept and navigated Navilas® laser (group A, n=24) with intravitreal aflibercept and conventional Pascal laser (group B, n=24).
Plan:
- Patients will be recruited in the Region of Southern Denmark and included in the study based on a clinical examination. Patients will be randomized at baseline (BL). Patients with both eyes eligible will participate with one eye in each group.
- Patients will receive intravitreal treatment at month (M) 0, 1 and 2 (see Treatment scheme). At M3 laser treatment will be performed if possible as determined by the examiner.
- From M4 patients will then be followed monthly with additional intravitreal injections given pro re nata.
- Criteria for re-treatment will be: 1. Central retinal thickness > 20% from lowest measurement. 2. Loss in BCVA>5 letters as compared to baseline.
- Eyes not suitable for laser treatment by M3 will continue treatment in a monthly pro re nata intravitreal regimen. If laser has not been given by the end of M5 patients will be withdrawn from the study.
Examination:
- Systemic biomarkers: Age, type of diabetes, duration of diabetes, health history, smoking status, blood pressure, body mass index, hemoglobin A1c, glomerular filtration rate, serum creatinine (BL).
- Diabetes therapy (BL, M12).
- ETDRS BCVA measurement (BL, M0-M12).
- Intraocular pressure (BL, M12).
- Cataract LOCS grading.
- Heidelberg fluorescein angiography, incl. measurement of area of foveal avascular zone [FAZ] (BL, M3, M12).
- Topcon 3D OCT-2000 spectral domain OCT (BL, M0-M12).
- Retinal vessel geometry measurements (BL, M3, M6, M12).
- Oxymap retinal oximetry measurement (BL, M3, M6, M12).
- Optos widefield retinal imaging (BL, M3, M6, M12).
Primary endpoint:
- Percentage of eyes that received additional aflibercept injections after laser at month 12 in group A and B (Paper I).
Secondary endpoints:
- Number of additional aflibercept injections after laser at month 12 in group A and B (Paper I).
- Change in ETDRS visual acuity from baseline to month 12 in group A and B (Paper I).
- Change in global and macular retinal vessel geometric markers (retinal vascular diameter and fractal dimension) from baseline to month 12 in group A and B (Paper II).
- Change in global and macular oxygen saturation from baseline to month 12 in group A and B (Paper II).
- Evaluation of non-invasive retinal risk factors (retinal vascular geometric markers and oxygen saturation) for successful treatment outcome at month 12 (in multiple logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex, duration of diabetes, smoking, blood pressure, body mass index, hemoglobin A1c and renal markers) (Paper II).
- Change in level of macular ischemia (area of FAZ) from baseline to month 12 in group A and B (Paper III).
- Evaluation of baseline area of FAZ as marker of successful treatment outcome at month 12 (in multiple logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex, duration of diabetes, smoking, blood pressure, body mass index, hemoglobin A1c and renal markers) (Paper III).
Clinical implication and scientific outcome:
Combination therapy with intravitreal aflibercept and navigated laser photocoagulation is likely to be the future in DME-treatment. As compared to intravitreal monotherapy, the fewer injections and lower cost meets the demand of the patients as well as those of society. Identification of retinal risk markers for DME treatment outcome offers an attractive assistance in the guidance of individualized treatment planning.
The present study will be performed at a PhD Study at University of Southern Denmark. Three papers in high-ranking international peer-reviewed journals have been planned. All results will be published irrespective positive or negative outcome.
Facilities:
A research laboratory has been established at the Department of Ophthalmology, Odense University Hospital. Necessary equipment for the study as well as office facilities will be available at the department. Oxymap T1, Pascal laser, Navilas® laser and software for retinal vascular measurement analysis (IVAN image analysis software and Singapore Institute Vessel Assessment-Fractal version 1.0) will be available. Rental of a Topcon 3D OCT-2000 will be included in the budget.
Statistical calculations:
The primary endpoint of the present study will be the percentage of eyes that will need additional intravitreal injections after laser.
Sample size calculations were based on the study by Liegl et al that evaluated the effect of combined intravitreal ranibizumab and navigated laser treatment versus ranibizumab monotherapy in DME. In that study additional injections needed was 35% and 85%, respectively. Given a probability level of 0.05 and a statistical power level of 90%, a study size of 19 patients in each group will be needed in the present study. In order to compensate for a 20% drop-out rate, 24 patients will be included in each group.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Navigated laser | Experimental | Device: Navigated laserAflibercept, Navilas® |
| Conventional laser | Active comparator | Device: Conventional laserAflibercept, Pascal |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Diabetes mellitus
- Clinically significant macular edema in the study eye.
- Central retinal thickness > 300 μm in the study eye.
- Best corrected visual acuity 35-80 ETDRS letters (0.10-0.80 Snellen equivalent) in the study eye.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Pregnancy.
- Active proliferative diabetic retinopathy in the study eye.
- History of cataract surgery, YAG capsulotomy, vitrectomy or retinal laser treatment in the study eye within 4 months prior to randomization.
- Ocular condition(s) in the study eye that in the opinion of the investigator would prevent improvement of visual acuity.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Navigated laserAflibercept, Navilas® | Device | Navigated laser |
| Conventional laserAflibercept, Pascal | Device | Conventional laser |
Primary outcome
Percentage of eyes that received additional aflibercept injections after laser at month 12 in group A and B
Time frame: 1 year
9 secondary outcomes
Number of additional aflibercept injections after laser at month 12 in group A and B
Time frame: 1 year
Change in ETDRS visual acuity from baseline to month 12 in group A and B
Time frame: 1 year
Change in global retinal vessel geometric markers from baseline to month 12 in group A and B
Time frame: 1 year
Change in macular retinal vessel geometric markers from baseline to month 12 in group A and B
Time frame: 1 year
Change in global oxygen saturation from baseline to month 12 in group A and B
Time frame: 1 year
Change in macular oxygen saturation from baseline to month 12 in group A and B
Time frame: 1 year
Evaluation of non-invasive retinal risk factors (retinal vascular geometric markers and oxygen saturation) for successful treatment outcome at month 12
Time frame: 1 year
Change in level of macular ischemia (area of foveal avascular zone (FAZ)) from baseline to month 12 in group A and B
Time frame: 1 year
Evaluation of baseline area of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) as marker of successful treatment outcome at month 12
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Mar 2019.
- Background: PubMed 19593541Grauslund J, Green A, Sjolie AK. Prevalence and 25 year incidence of proliferative retinopathy among Danish type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetologia. 2009 Sep;52(9):1829-35. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1450-4. Epub 2009 Jul 12.
- Background: PubMed 19167079Klein R, Knudtson MD, Lee KE, Gangnon R, Klein BE. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy XXIII: the twenty-five-year incidence of macular edema in persons with type 1 diabetes. Ophthalmology. 2009 Mar;116(3):497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.10.016. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
- Background: PubMed 2062512Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 9. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology. 1991 May;98(5 Suppl):766-85.
- Background: PubMed 22491395Rajendram R, Fraser-Bell S, Kaines A, Michaelides M, Hamilton RD, Esposti SD, Peto T, Egan C, Bunce C, Leslie RD, Hykin PG. A 2-year prospective randomized controlled trial of intravitreal bevacizumab or laser therapy (BOLT) in the management of diabetic macular edema: 24-month data: report 3. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Aug;130(8):972-9. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.393.
- Background: PubMed 20427088Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network; Elman MJ, Aiello LP, Beck RW, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Edwards AR, Ferris FL 3rd, Friedman SM, Glassman AR, Miller KM, Scott IU, Stockdale CR, Sun JK. Randomized trial evaluating ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2010 Jun;117(6):1064-1077.e35. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.031. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
- Background: PubMed 22537617Do DV, Nguyen QD, Boyer D, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Brown DM, Vitti R, Berliner AJ, Gao B, Zeitz O, Ruckert R, Schmelter T, Sandbrink R, Heier JS; da Vinci Study Group. One-year outcomes of the da Vinci Study of VEGF Trap-Eye in eyes with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2012 Aug;119(8):1658-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.010. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
- Background: PubMed 23345966Neubauer AS, Langer J, Liegl R, Haritoglou C, Wolf A, Kozak I, Seidensticker F, Ulbig M, Freeman WR, Kampik A, Kernt M. Navigated macular laser decreases retreatment rate for diabetic macular edema: a comparison with conventional macular laser. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:121-8. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S38559. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
- Background: PubMed 24723616Barteselli G, Kozak I, El-Emam S, Chhablani J, Cortes MA, Freeman WR. 12-month results of the standardised combination therapy for diabetic macular oedema: intravitreal bevacizumab and navigated retinal photocoagulation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;98(8):1036-41. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304488. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
- Background: PubMed 25541960Liegl R, Langer J, Seidensticker F, Reznicek L, Haritoglou C, Ulbig MW, Neubauer AS, Kampik A, Kernt M. Comparative evaluation of combined navigated laser photocoagulation and intravitreal ranibizumab in the treatment of diabetic macular edema. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 26;9(12):e113981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113981. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 25692915Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network; Wells JA, Glassman AR, Ayala AR, Jampol LM, Aiello LP, Antoszyk AN, Arnold-Bush B, Baker CW, Bressler NM, Browning DJ, Elman MJ, Ferris FL, Friedman SM, Melia M, Pieramici DJ, Sun JK, Beck RW. Aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema. N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 26;372(13):1193-203. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414264. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
- Background: PubMed 24914239Broe R, Rasmussen ML, Frydkjaer-Olsen U, Olsen BS, Mortensen HB, Hodgson L, Wong TY, Peto T, Grauslund J. Retinal vessel calibers predict long-term microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes: the Danish Cohort of Pediatric Diabetes 1987 (DCPD1987). Diabetes. 2014 Nov;63(11):3906-14. doi: 10.2337/db14-0227. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
- Background: PubMed 24981770Broe R, Rasmussen ML, Frydkjaer-Olsen U, Olsen BS, Mortensen HB, Peto T, Grauslund J. Retinal vascular fractals predict long-term microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes mellitus: the Danish Cohort of Pediatric Diabetes 1987 (DCPD1987). Diabetologia. 2014 Oct;57(10):2215-21. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3317-6. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. A minimum of 3 pier reviewed articles. All results will be published wether positive or negative.
Related trials for Diabetic Macular Oedema
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence in China: Faricimab Use in Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (The Farseeing Study)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Long-Term Follow-Up Study of RGX-314 Administered in the Suprachoroidal Space for Participants With and Without Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetic Retinopathy, DR
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Trial for Intravitreal Injection of 4D-150 in Adults With Diabetic Macular Edema (DME).
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
RecruitingPhase 2
Oral N-Acetylcysteine on Diabetic Macular Edema
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
COMO: A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Masked Study Comparing the Efficacy of EYP-1901 Against Aflibercept in DME
Diabetic Macular Edema, DME
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Søren Leer Blindbæk, MD principal investigator
Research Unit of Ophthalmology, Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark and Department of Ophthalmology, Odense University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Navigated laser and Conventional laser in people with Diabetic Macular Oedema, run by Odense University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of eyes that received additional aflibercept injections after laser at month 12 in group A and B (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02554747, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2019.