AzTrials
AzTrials

Asthmatic BronchitisNCT02555345

Gene Expression Profile and Inflammation Profile of Classic Asthma, Cough Variant Asthma and Eosinophilic Bronchitis

An observational study of Asthmatic Bronchitis, run by State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to identify and validate the gene expression differentials of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and differential inflammation profiles and other aspects in classic asthma, cough-variant asthma and eosinophilic bronchitis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Asthmatic Bronchitis
How many people
250 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Oct 2014to Jan 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All of subjects with classic asthma, CVA, eosinophilic bronchitis, and healthy volunteers are recruited from respiratory outpatient clinics and from staff at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College between October 25, 2014 and January 20,2016.

Who may be able to join

  • The patients with classic asthma inclusion criteria Asthmatic patient inclusion criteria
  • Male or female patients aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 65, who have signed an Informed Consent form prior to initiation of any study-related procedure.
  • The patients with classic asthma had a history of episode dyspnea and wheezing with or without cough.
  • Clinical diagnosis of asthma confirmed by a chest physician according to international guidelines (GINA 2014); methacholine airway hyperresponsiveness (provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1(forced expiratory volume at one second )【PD20】),>12% improvement in FEV1 10 min after inhaling 200ug of salbutamol.
  • None of the patients with classic asthma had used inhaled or oral corticosteroids, long-acting β2-agonists, leukotriene antagonists, sodium cromoglycate,or nedocromil sodium, anticholinergic agents, during four weeks prior to entry into the study.
  • The patients with CVA inclusion criteria
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Male or female patients aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 65, who have signed an Informed Consent form prior to initiation of any study-related procedure.
  • The diagnosis of CVA is based on isolated cough lasting for ≥ 8 weeks without wheezing or dyspnea, airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), and relief of cough with bronchodilators according to recommendations in the Chinese national guidelines on the diagnosis and management of cough.
  • None of the patients with CVA had used inhaled or oral corticosteroids, long-acting β2-agonists, leukotriene antagonists, sodium cromoglycate,or nedocromil sodium, anticholinergic agents, during four weeks prior to entry into the study.
  • The patients with EB inclusion criteria
  • Male or female patients aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 65, who have signed an Informed Consent form prior to initiation of any study-related procedure.
  • The diagnosis of EB is based on cough lasting for ≥ 8 weeks according to recommendations in the Chinese national guidelines on the diagnosis and management of cough.
  • None of the patients with EB had used inhaled or oral corticosteroids, long-acting β2-agonists, leukotriene antagonists, sodium cromoglycate,or nedocromil sodium, anticholinergic agents, during four weeks prior to entry into the study.
  • Healthy subjects inclusion criteria
  • Male or female patients aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 65, who have signed an Informed Consent form prior to initiation of any study-related procedure.
  • Normal spirometry: baseline FEV1 ≥ 80% of the predicted normal value, FEV1/FVC(forced vital capacity) > LLN (lower limit of normal).
  • Normal airways responsiveness.
  • Healthy subjects have no any disease or negative allergen skin prick test results.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with classic asthma, CVA and EB exclusion criteria
  • The presence of any of the following will exclude a subject from study enrolment:
  • Current smokers, ex-smokers. Individuals with respiratory infection during the previous one month. Clinical history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD), bronchiectasis, pulmonary embolism.
  • Clinical history of haematological, immunologic, renal, neurologic, hepatic, endocrinal or other disease, or any condition that might compromise the results or interpretation of the study.
  • Asthma exacerbation and unstable asthma . Pregnant or lactating women.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Kefang Lai, PHD contact

8620-83062887

klai@163.com

Nanshan Zhong, MD contact

8620-83062718

nanshan@vip.163.com

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120

    Kefang Lai, PHD, 8620-83062887, Klai@163.com

    Nanshan Zhong, MD, 8620-83062718, nanshan@vip.163.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Difference in Gene Expression Profile in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells and Inflammation Profile in Patients With Classic Asthma, Cough Variant Asthma, and Eosinophilic Bronchitis Compared With Healthy Controls

This study aims to identify and validate the gene expression differentials of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and differential inflammation profiles and other aspects in classic asthma, cough-variant asthma and eosinophilic bronchitis.

Read the detailed description

Asthma is a common and heterogeneous respiratory disorder affecting millions of people, posing a considerable burden on health care systems globally. The disease is characterized by inflammation of the airways with eosinophils, neutrophils, mast cells, lymphocytes, airway epithelial cells, smooth muscle cells and other cells, by airflow obstruction and by bronchial hyperresponsiveness. The disease is triggered by multiple gene-environment interactions. Asthma heterogeneity is recognized in terms of clinical phenotypes of asthma whereby classic asthma (CA) and cough variant asthma (CVA) are identified. classic asthma is a common phenotype of asthma that presents episodic dyspnoea and wheezing with or without cough. Cough variant asthma is a phenotype of asthma that presents solely cause of chronic cough.

Eosinophilic bronchitis (EB) is a common cause of chronic cough, which like eosinophils asthma is characterized by airway eosinophilic inflammation, but unlike asthma there is no airway hyperresponsiveness or variable airflow obstruction.

Improvement of disease diagnosis and management require a better understanding of disease heterogeneity. A useful biomarker for phenotype recognition will represent underlying pathologic mechanisms of disease, marking heterogeneity and guiding personalized treatment approaches. Our hypothesis was that the different clinical manifestos in patients with eosinophilic bronchitis, classic asthma, and cough-variant asthma could be caused by differential gene expression profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and differential inflammation profiles and other aspects.

Keywords
classic asthma, cough variant asthma,eosinophilic bronchitis
Medical subject headings
Bronchiolitis, Cough-Variant Asthma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02555345
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
classic asthma/No interventionPatients with classic asthma were stable.Chest X-ray or CT scan was normal.Fenofibrate(FeNO) was performed.Spirometry was needed. The leicester cough questionnaire (LCQ) was offered to physicians.Sputum,blood and urine samples were collected to study genetic, inflammation and other aspects of these diseases.
CVA/No interventionChest X-ray or CT scan was normal.FeNO was performed. Spirometry was needed. The LCQ was offered to physicians. Sputum,blood and urine samples were collected to study genetic, inflammation and other aspects of these diseases.
EB/No interventionChest X-ray or CT scan was normal.FeNO was performed. Spirometry was needed. The LCQ was offered.Sputum,blood and urine samples were collected to study genetic, inflammation and other aspects of these diseases.
Healthy/No interventionChest X-ray or CT scan was normal.FeNO was performed.Spirometry was needed. Sputum,blood and urine samples were collected to study genetic, inflammation and other aspects of these diseases.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Difference in Gene Expression Profile of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Classic Asthma,Cough Variant Asthma and Eosinophilic Bronchitis Compared with Healthy Controls

    Five milliliters of venous blood was collected. The peripheral blood mononuclear cells(PBMC) were isolated by the Ficoll-Paque plus(GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp, NJ ) according to the manufacture's recommendations. RNA from PBMC was extracted. RNA-seq, a high throughput RNA sequencing technology, would characterize the transcriptome by sequencing complementary cDNAs followed by mapping of the sequence reads to the genome.

    Measured: 15 months

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Induced sputum cytology

    Before sputum induction, subjects were instructed to rinse their mouth to remove any cellular debris. Nebulization was conducted using 3% saline via an ultrasonic nebulizer. Following expectoration into the clear sterile plastic pot, the sputum plugs were weighed and treated with 4 aliquots of dithiothreitol to completely dissolve the mucus. The mixture was subsequently vortexed, shaked and centrifuged. The supernatant was stored at -80℃ for inflammation profile analysis. The cell pallets were mounted on a glass slide for fixation with polyaldehyde and Haematoxylin-eosin staining. Samples with 5% or fewer epithelial cells of the total cell count were deemed eligible. This entailed counting of 400 non-squamous cells for cytology assessment. Inflammation phenotype was assigned based on a sputum eosinophil cutoff of greater than 3% and a sputum neutrophil cutoff of greater than 61%.

    Measured: 15 months

  2. Airway inflammation indices

    Sputum Interleukin-1β(IL-1β), IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IP-10 (CXCL10), MCP-1 (CCL2), MIP-1β(CCL4) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured using Luminex xMAP multiplex technology. Comparison in airway inflammation in patients with classic asthma, cough variant asthma and eosinophilic bronchitis was performed.

    Measured: 15 months

  3. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide Measurements

    Fractional exhaled nitric oxide Measurements will be performed by using a NIOX MINO device(Aerocrine, Sweden),based on the recommendations of international guidelines. The relationship between FENO levels and eosinophilic airway inflammation was assessed in patients with classic asthma, cough variant asthma and eosinophilic bronchitis.

    Measured: 15 months

  4. Peripheral blood eosinophil counts, serum IgE assessment

    Blood was drawn for differential and total cell counts.Serum total Immunoglobulin E(IgE) and specific IgE was measured using the Unicap system(Pharmacia Diagnostics, Uppasala, Sweden ).Relationship between peripheral blood eosinophilia and IgE was assessed.Relationship between peripheral blood eosinophilia and sputum eosinophilia was assessed.Relationship between FENO and peripheral blood eosinophilia was assessed.Relationship between FENO and sputum eosinophilia was assessed.

    Measured: 15 months

  5. Cumulative provocative dose causing 20% fall in FEV1 measured through the Methacholine bronchial challenge test

    Spirometric values at the baseline are referred to as FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC and MMEF. Spirometry tests are carried out using a spirometer (Jaeger, Germany). All operation procedures meet the joint recommendation by ATS and ERS.The predicted values are selected based on the reference regression model established by Jinping Zheng and nanshan Zhong.Methacholine bronchial challenge test was performed only in subjects with a baseline FEV1 greater than 60% predicted using hand-squeeze nebulizers.The bronchial challenge was ceased in case of FEV1 fall being 20% or greater, or the maximal cumulative dose of methacholine (2.50mg) had been given. Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) was defined as 20% or greater fall in FEV1.The cumulative provocative dose causing 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20FEV1-MCh) was reported in subjects with AHR. Relationship between FENO,serum IgE,airway and systematic inflammation and AHR was assessed.

    Measured: 15 months

  6. Using LCQ to evaluate the impact of cough on recruited patients with classic asthma, CVA and EB.

    The questionnaire of Leicester Cough Questionnaire(LCQ) comprises 19 questions. Scores range from 3 to 21, with higher scores representing a better quality of life. Comparison in LCQ total scores in patients with classic asthma, cough variant asthma and eosinophilic bronchitis was performed.

    Measured: 15 months

  7. Circulating markers of inflammation

    Serum was collected for analysis of systematic inflammation.systematic inflammation indices including IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1βand CRP.Comparison in systematic inflammation in patients with classic asthma, cough variant asthma and eosinophilic bronchitis was performed.

    Measured: 15 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Sep 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2014
  3. Primary completionJan 2016 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2016 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
250 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02555345
Sponsor's protocol ID
RZ-689
Status last verified
Sep 2015
First submitted
7 Sep 2015
Last updated
21 Sep 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Asthmatic Bronchitis, run by State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 18 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Kefang Lai, PHD (8620-83062887, klai@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Difference in Gene Expression Profile of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Classic Asthma,Cough Variant Asthma and Eosinophilic Bronchitis Compared with Healthy Controls (time frame: 15 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in