AsthmaPhase 3NCT02555371
Cessation Versus Continuation of Long-term Mepolizumab in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Patients
A Phase 3 study testing Mepolizumab 100mg in people with Asthma, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 73 sites in 14 countries.
Trial summary
Primary objective of the study is to evaluate whether patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who have received long-term treatment with mepolizumab (at least 3 years) need to maintain treatment with mepolizumab to continue to receive benefit. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Asthma
- What is being tested?
- Mepolizumab 100mg
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 306 participants
- Where
- 73 sitesin 14 countries
- Study dates
- 7 Jan 2016to 24 Jul 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Informed Consent: Prior to commencing any study related activities, subjects must be able and willing to provide written informed consent, and an assent for subjects under 18 years of age, at Visit 0 (or Visit 1 if these Visits are conducted on the same day).
- MEA115666 or 201312 Study Participation: Participation (through the Follow Up/Exit Visit or Early Withdrawal) in either study with documented evidence of at least 6 months of continuous mepolizumab treatment prior to Visit 1. Continuous treatment with mepolizumab is defined as no more than 2 consecutive missed doses (no treatment gaps of more than 12 weeks [84 days] between any two doses).
- Current Anti-Asthma Therapy: Asthma is currently being treated with a controller medication and the subject has been on a controller medication for the past 12 weeks. Subjects will be expected to continue controller therapy for the duration of the study.
- Male or Eligible Female Subjects: A female is eligible to enter and participate in the study if she is of: Non-child bearing potential (i.e., physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, including any female who is post-menopausal or surgically sterile). Surgically sterile females are defined as those with a documented hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy or tubal ligation. Post-menopausal females are defined as being amenorrhoeic for greater than 1 year with an appropriate clinical profile, e.g., age appropriate, > 45 years, in the absence of hormone replacement therapy.
- OR Child bearing potential, has a negative pregnancy test at screening, and agrees to acceptable contraceptive methods approved in their local country, when used consistently and correctly (i.e., in accordance with the approved product label and the instructions of the physician) for the duration of the study and for 4 months after the last study drug administration.
- A urine pregnancy test is required of all females of child-bearing potential at each scheduled study visit prior to the injection of study treatment, and at the Exit Visit, Early Withdrawal (EW) or Discontinuation of IP Visit.
- French subjects: In France, a subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if either affiliated to or a beneficiary of a social security category.
Who cannot join
- MEA115666 or 201312 IP Discontinuation: Subjects withdrawn from IP or withdrawn from study participation from either MEA115666 or 201312 for safety reasons.
- Health Status: Clinically significant deterioration in health status at the completion of participation or EW from either the MEA115666 or 201312 trials which in the opinion of the investigator would make the subject unsuitable for participation in this study.
- Pregnancy: Subjects who are pregnant or breastfeeding. Subjects should not be enrolled if they plan to become pregnant during the time of study participation.
- Cardiovascular: Subjects who have severe or clinically significant cardiovascular disease uncontrolled with standard treatment. Including but not limited to:
- known ejection fraction of <30% OR severe heart failure meeting New York Heart Association Class IV classification OR hospitalised in the 12 months prior to Visit 1 for severe heart failure meeting New York Heart Association Class III OR angina diagnosed less than 3 months prior to Visit 1 or at Visit 1.
- 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG): ECG which has a clinically significant abnormality observed at the Screening Visit as determined by the investigator. Subjects with the following abnormalities are excluded from study participation: QT interval corrected for heart rate by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) > 450 milliseconds (msec), or QTcF >480 msec for subjects with Bundle Branch Block.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Malignancy: A current malignancy or previous history of cancer in remission for less than 12 months prior to screening (Subjects that had localized carcinoma of the skin which was resected for cure will not be excluded).
- Note for South Korea: Korean subjects with a diagnosis of malignancy within 5 years are excluded.
- Other Monoclonal Antibodies: Subjects who have received any monoclonal antibody (other than XOLAIR®) to treat inflammatory disease within 5 half-lives of Visit 1.
- XOLAIR is a registered trademark of Genentech USA, Inc. and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
- Adherence: Subjects who have known evidence of lack of adherence within studies MEA115666 or 201312 (less than 80%) to controller medications, scheduled study visits and/or ability to follow physician's recommendations.
- Smoking status: Current smokers
- Inability to read: In the opinion of the Investigator, any subject who is unable to read and/or would not be able to complete a questionnaire.
Trial locations and contacts
73 sites in 14 countries.
73 sites in 14 countries
United States13 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Albany, Georgia, 31707
GSK Investigational Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21224
GSK Investigational Site
Denver, Colorado, 80206
GSK Investigational Site
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
GSK Investigational Site
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
GSK Investigational Site
Long Beach, California, 90808
GSK Investigational Site
Murray, Utah, 84107
GSK Investigational Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212
GSK Investigational Site
New Haven, Connecticut, 6504
GSK Investigational Site
Riverside, California, 92506
GSK Investigational Site
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
GSK Investigational Site
Rochester, New York, 14642
GSK Investigational Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27104
Japan9 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Chiba, 296-8602
GSK Investigational Site
Fukuoka, 802-0052
GSK Investigational Site
Fukuoka, 811-1394
GSK Investigational Site
Gunma, 370-0615
GSK Investigational Site
Ibaraki, 319-1113
GSK Investigational Site
Kanagawa, 252-0392
GSK Investigational Site
Osaka, 596-8501
GSK Investigational Site
Tokyo, 102-0083
GSK Investigational Site
Tokyo, 103-0027
South Korea7 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Anyang-Si, Gyeonggi-do, 14068
GSK Investigational Site
Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, 14584
GSK Investigational Site
Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, 28644
GSK Investigational Site
Gwangju, 61469
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 06973
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 120/752
GSK Investigational Site
Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, 16499
Germany6 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 10367
GSK Investigational Site
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60596
GSK Investigational Site
Gelnhausen, Hesse, 63571
GSK Investigational Site
Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, 23552
GSK Investigational Site
Magdeburg, 39120
GSK Investigational Site
Neu-Isenburg, Hesse, 63263
Argentina5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1424BSF
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1426ABP
GSK Investigational Site
Mendoza, M5500CCG
GSK Investigational Site
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, S2000DBS
GSK Investigational Site
San Rafael, Mendoza Province, 5600
France5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275
GSK Investigational Site
Lille, 59037
GSK Investigational Site
Marseille, 13915
GSK Investigational Site
Montpellier, 34295
GSK Investigational Site
Paris, 75877
Russia5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Barnaul, 656 045
GSK Investigational Site
Chelyabinsk, 454106
GSK Investigational Site
Moscow, 123182
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 194354
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 194356
Spain5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Alicante, 03004
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08025
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08036
GSK Investigational Site
Pozuelo de Alarcón/Madrid, 28223
GSK Investigational Site
Sabadell (Barcelona), 08208
Canada4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 3E4
GSK Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, H4J 1C5
GSK Investigational Site
Québec, G1V 4G5
GSK Investigational Site
Saint-Charles-Borromée, Quebec, J6E 2B4
Poland4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bialystok, 15-044
GSK Investigational Site
Krakow, 30-033
GSK Investigational Site
Lodz, 90-153
GSK Investigational Site
Wroclaw, 54-239
Ukraine4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Dnipropetrovsk, 49074
GSK Investigational Site
Kharkiv, 61124
GSK Investigational Site
Mykolayiv, 54003
GSK Investigational Site
Vinnytsia, 21018
Australia2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009
GSK Investigational Site
New Lambton, New South Wales, 2305
Netherlands2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Amsterdam, 1105 AZ
GSK Investigational Site
Leeuwarden, 8934 AD
Romania2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bucharest, 050159
GSK Investigational Site
Iași, 700115
About this study
Official title: A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Compare Cessation Versus Continuation of Long-term Mepolizumab Treatment in Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma (201810)
Primary objective of the study is to evaluate whether patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who have received long-term treatment with mepolizumab (at least 3 years) need to maintain treatment with mepolizumab to continue to receive benefit. Subjects who participated in the open-label studies MEA115666 or 201312 with at least 6 months of treatment with mepolizumab prior to Visit 1 and who have no more than 2 consecutive missed doses of mepolizumab treatment will be eligible to participate in this study. This study will be conducted in 4 parts in approximately 300 subjects. Part A will be Variable Open-Label Run-in (for subjects with less than 3 years of mepolizumab treatment). Once the required 3 year exposure is reached, subjects will enter Part B- Fixed Open-Label Run-In (4 weeks to 8 weeks). During Part A and B subjects will be administered Open-label mepolizumab (100 milligram [mg] Subcutaneous [SC]) every 4 weeks. Part C will be the randomized double-blinded part. Upon completion of Part B, eligible subjects will be randomized to mepolizumab (100 mg SC) every 4 weeks or placebo administered SC every 4 weeks for 52 weeks.
Subjects discontinuing investigational product (IP) due to a clinically significant asthma exacerbation will then enter optional Part D of the study. During Part D, subjects receive open-label mepolizumab in addition to their standard of care therapy for the remainder of the study, through Part D up to 52-weeks post-randomization. An Exit Visit will be conducted 52 weeks after randomization in order to assess subject's efficacy parameters, immunogenicity status, and to conduct additional safety assessments. Eligible subjects will participate in the study ranging from 56 to192 weeks, depending on the duration of Part A (0 to 132 weeks) and Part B (4 to 8 weeks).
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Being tested
- Mepolizumab 100mg, Placebo
- Keywords
- Severe eosinophilic asthma, mepolizumab, asthma exacerbation
- Medical subject headings
- Asthma, Pulmonary Eosinophilia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mepolizumab 100mgBiological
Mepolizumab is a fully humanised Immunoglobulin (IgG) antibody (IgG1, kappa) with human heavy and light chain frameworks. Mepolizumab will be provided as a lyophilised cake in sterile vials for individual use.
PlaceboDrug
The placebo will be 0.9% sodium chloride solution and will be provided by the study site.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm Mepolizumab 100 mg | Experimental | There will be 4 parts during the study. Part A will be Variable Open-Label Run-in (maximum up to 132 weeks). Part B- Fixed Open-Label Run-In (4 Weeks to 8 weeks). Part C will be randomized double-blind treatment period (Up to 52 weeks) and in case of clinically significant asthma exacerbation, optional open label switch Part D (Up to 52 weeks post randomization). Subjects will receive mepolizumab (100 mg SC) every 4 weeks throughout study Receives: Biological: Mepolizumab 100mg |
| Arm Placebo | Placebo comparator | There will be 4 parts during the study. Part A will be Variable Open-Label Run-in (maximum up to 132 weeks). Part B- Fixed Open-Label Run-In (4 Weeks to 8 weeks). Part C will be randomized double-blind treatment period (Up to 52 weeks) and in case of clinically significant asthma exacerbation, optional open label switch Part D (Up to 52 weeks post randomization). During Part A, B and D, subjects will receive open label mepolizumab (100 mg SC) every 4 weeks and during Part C, subjects will receive placebo SC every 4 weeks. Receives: Biological: Mepolizumab 100mg; Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With First Clinically Significant Exacerbation in Part C
Clinically significant exacerbation was defined as worsening of asthma which requires use of systemic corticosteroids (e.g., prednisone) for at least 3 days or a single intramuscular (IM) corticosteroid dose and/or hospitalization and/or emergency department (ED) visits. For participants on maintenance systemic corticosteroids, at least double the existing maintenance dose for at least 3 days is required. Percentage of participants with clinically significant exacerbation over time during the on-treatment period of Part C and 95% confidence interval were estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Intent-to-Treat Population includes all randomized participants who received at least one dose of double-blind study medication within Part C.
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 52
Secondary outcomes (3)
Ratio to Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Count in Part C
Blood samples were collected at specific time points to measure blood eosinophils level. Baseline was defined as the latest available assessment prior to first dose of double-blind treatment within Part C. Ratio to Baseline is defined as visit value divided by Baseline value and was analyzed using Mixed Model Repeated Measures with covariates of Baseline, region, exacerbations in the year prior to randomization (as an ordinal variable), Baseline maintenance oral corticosteroids (OCS) therapy (OCS versus no OCS), treatment and visit, plus interaction terms for visit by Baseline and visit by treatment group. The log transformation was applied to blood eosinophil counts prior to analysis. If a blood eosinophil count of zero was reported, a small value was added prior to log transforming the data. The dispersion measure used was log standard error.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 52
Percentage of Participants With 0.5 Point or More Increase in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-5 Score From Baseline in Part C
The ACQ-5 is a five-item, self-completed questionnaire. Five questions (concerning nocturnal awakening, waking in the morning, activity limitation, shortness of breath and wheeze) enquire about the frequency and/or severity of symptoms over the previous week. The response ranges from zero (no impairment/limitation) to six (total impairment/ limitation) scale. Increase in score of >= 0.5 units from Baseline indicates decrease in asthma control. Baseline is the latest available assessment prior to first dose of double-blind treatment within Part C. Percentage of participants with a 0.5 point or more increase in ACQ-5 score from Baseline over time during the on-treatment period of Part C and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 52
Percentage of Participants With Time to First Exacerbation Requiring Hospitalization or ED Visit in Part C
Exacerbations of asthma requiring hospitalization or ED visit were assessed. The analysis was performed from Cox Proportional Hazards Model with covariates of treatment group, region, exacerbations in the year prior to randomization (as an ordinal variable) and Baseline maintenance OCS therapy (OCS versus no OCS). Percentage of participants with an exacerbation over time and its 95% confidence intervals were estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Study start7 Jan 2016
- Primary completion24 Jul 2019
- Study completion24 Jul 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AsthmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 306 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02555371
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201810
- Other IDs
- 2015-002361-32, 2015
- Status last verified
- Jan 2020
- First submitted
- 17 Sep 2015
- Last updated
- 5 Feb 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
- Expanded access
- Available
Publications
Moore WC, Kornmann O, Humbert M, Poirier C, Bel EH, Kaneko N, Smith SG, Martin N, Gilson MJ, Price RG, Bradford ES, Liu MC. Stopping versus continuing long-term mepolizumab treatment in severe eosinophilic asthma (COMET study). Eur Respir J. 2022 Jan 6;59(1):2100396. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00396-2021. Print 2022 Jan.
PubMed 34172470
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Feb 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Compare Cessation Versus Continuation of Long-term Mepolizumab Treatment in Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma (201810)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02555371
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 201810
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Keywords
- Severe eosinophilic asthma, mepolizumab, asthma exacerbation
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 306 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 7 Jan 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Jul 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Feb 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary objective of the study is to evaluate whether patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who have received long-term treatment with mepolizumab (at least 3 years) need to maintain treatment with mepolizumab to continue to receive benefit. Subjects who participated in the open-label studies MEA115666 or 201312 with at least 6 months of treatment with mepolizumab prior to Visit 1 and who have no more than 2 consecutive missed doses of mepolizumab treatment will be eligible to participate in this study. This study will be conducted in 4 parts in approximately 300 subjects. Part A will be Variable Open-Label Run-in (for subjects with less than 3 years of mepolizumab treatment). Once the required 3 year exposure is reached, subjects will enter Part B- Fixed Open-Label Run-In (4 weeks to 8 weeks). During Part A and B subjects will be administered Open-label mepolizumab (100 milligram [mg] Subcutaneous [SC]) every 4 weeks. Part C will be the randomized double-blinded part. Upon completion of Part B, eligible subjects will be randomized to mepolizumab (100 mg SC) every 4 weeks or placebo administered SC every 4 weeks for 52 weeks.
Subjects discontinuing investigational product (IP) due to a clinically significant asthma exacerbation will then enter optional Part D of the study. During Part D, subjects receive open-label mepolizumab in addition to their standard of care therapy for the remainder of the study, through Part D up to 52-weeks post-randomization. An Exit Visit will be conducted 52 weeks after randomization in order to assess subject's efficacy parameters, immunogenicity status, and to conduct additional safety assessments. Eligible subjects will participate in the study ranging from 56 to192 weeks, depending on the duration of Part A (0 to 132 weeks) and Part B (4 to 8 weeks).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm Mepolizumab 100 mg | Experimental | Biological: Mepolizumab 100mgThere will be 4 parts during the study. Part A will be Variable Open-Label Run-in (maximum up to 132 weeks). Part B- Fixed Open-Label Run-In (4 Weeks to 8 weeks). Part C will be randomized double-blind treatment period (Up to 52 weeks) and in case of clinically significant asthma exacerbation, optional open label switch Part D (Up to 52 weeks post randomization). Subjects will receive mepolizumab (100 mg SC) every 4 weeks throughout study |
| Arm Placebo | Placebo comparator | Biological: Mepolizumab 100mg, Drug: PlaceboThere will be 4 parts during the study. Part A will be Variable Open-Label Run-in (maximum up to 132 weeks). Part B- Fixed Open-Label Run-In (4 Weeks to 8 weeks). Part C will be randomized double-blind treatment period (Up to 52 weeks) and in case of clinically significant asthma exacerbation, optional open label switch Part D (Up to 52 weeks post randomization). During Part A, B and D, subjects will receive open label mepolizumab (100 mg SC) every 4 weeks and during Part C, subjects will receive placebo SC every 4 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Informed Consent: Prior to commencing any study related activities, subjects must be able and willing to provide written informed consent, and an assent for subjects under 18 years of age, at Visit 0 (or Visit 1 if these Visits are conducted on the same day).
- MEA115666 or 201312 Study Participation: Participation (through the Follow Up/Exit Visit or Early Withdrawal) in either study with documented evidence of at least 6 months of continuous mepolizumab treatment prior to Visit 1. Continuous treatment with mepolizumab is defined as no more than 2 consecutive missed doses (no treatment gaps of more than 12 weeks [84 days] between any two doses).
- Current Anti-Asthma Therapy: Asthma is currently being treated with a controller medication and the subject has been on a controller medication for the past 12 weeks. Subjects will be expected to continue controller therapy for the duration of the study.
- Male or Eligible Female Subjects: A female is eligible to enter and participate in the study if she is of: Non-child bearing potential (i.e., physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, including any female who is post-menopausal or surgically sterile). Surgically sterile females are defined as those with a documented hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy or tubal ligation. Post-menopausal females are defined as being amenorrhoeic for greater than 1 year with an appropriate clinical profile, e.g., age appropriate, > 45 years, in the absence of hormone replacement therapy.
- OR Child bearing potential, has a negative pregnancy test at screening, and agrees to acceptable contraceptive methods approved in their local country, when used consistently and correctly (i.e., in accordance with the approved product label and the instructions of the physician) for the duration of the study and for 4 months after the last study drug administration.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- MEA115666 or 201312 IP Discontinuation: Subjects withdrawn from IP or withdrawn from study participation from either MEA115666 or 201312 for safety reasons.
- Health Status: Clinically significant deterioration in health status at the completion of participation or EW from either the MEA115666 or 201312 trials which in the opinion of the investigator would make the subject unsuitable for participation in this study.
- Pregnancy: Subjects who are pregnant or breastfeeding. Subjects should not be enrolled if they plan to become pregnant during the time of study participation.
- Cardiovascular: Subjects who have severe or clinically significant cardiovascular disease uncontrolled with standard treatment. Including but not limited to:
- known ejection fraction of <30% OR severe heart failure meeting New York Heart Association Class IV classification OR hospitalised in the 12 months prior to Visit 1 for severe heart failure meeting New York Heart Association Class III OR angina diagnosed less than 3 months prior to Visit 1 or at Visit 1.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mepolizumab 100mgMepolizumab is a fully humanised Immunoglobulin (IgG) antibody (IgG1, kappa) with human heavy and light chain frameworks. Mepolizumab will be provided as a lyophilised cake in sterile vials for individual use. | Biological | Arm Mepolizumab 100 mg, Arm Placebo |
| PlaceboThe placebo will be 0.9% sodium chloride solution and will be provided by the study site. | Drug | Arm Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With First Clinically Significant Exacerbation in Part C
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 52
Clinically significant exacerbation was defined as worsening of asthma which requires use of systemic corticosteroids (e.g., prednisone) for at least 3 days or a single intramuscular (IM) corticosteroid dose and/or hospitalization and/or emergency department (ED) visits. For participants on maintenance systemic corticosteroids, at least double the existing maintenance dose for at least 3 days is required. Percentage of participants with clinically significant exacerbation over time during the on-treatment period of Part C and 95% confidence interval were estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Intent-to-Treat Population includes all randomized participants who received at least one dose of double-blind study medication within Part C.
3 secondary outcomes
Ratio to Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Count in Part C
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 52
Percentage of Participants With 0.5 Point or More Increase in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-5 Score From Baseline in Part C
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 52
Percentage of Participants With Time to First Exacerbation Requiring Hospitalization or ED Visit in Part C
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Feb 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34172470Moore WC, Kornmann O, Humbert M, Poirier C, Bel EH, Kaneko N, Smith SG, Martin N, Gilson MJ, Price RG, Bradford ES, Liu MC. Stopping versus continuing long-term mepolizumab treatment in severe eosinophilic asthma (COMET study). Eur Respir J. 2022 Jan 6;59(1):2100396. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00396-2021. Print 2022 Jan.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
Related trials for Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
Pilot Study to Identify the Mediators and Inflammatory Cell Surface Receptors Involved in Allergic Airway Inflammation
Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Compare the Relative Potency of Salbutamol Administered Via Metered Dose Inhalers (MDI) Containing Propellants HFA-152a to HFA-134a in Mild Asthmatics Aged 18 to 65 Inclusive
Asthma, Mild Asthma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Assessing the Effect of Dupilumab on Inducing Clinical Remission in Asthma
Asthma Control
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Local Antibiotic Delivery for Community Acquired Pneumonia
Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-07275315 in People With Moderate-To-Severe Asthma
Asthma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
73 sites in 14 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Mepolizumab 100mg in people with Asthma, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 73 sites in 14 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 73 sites in United States, Japan, South Korea, Germany, Argentina and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Feb 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With First Clinically Significant Exacerbation in Part C (time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 52). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02555371, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2020.