Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseNCT02557178
Home-Based Health Management of COPD Patients
A study testing health coaching in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Sara Seifert at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Minnesota HealthSolutions Corporation (MHS) proposes to develop and evaluate a program to motivate and monitor people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to complete home exercise as part of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- What is being tested?
- health coaching
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 154 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2016to Mar 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- diagnosis of GOLD stage II, III, or IV COPD
- current or previous smoker with at least 10 pack-years of cigarette smoking
- be hospitalized for an exacerbation of COPD
Who cannot join
- high likelihood of being lost to follow-up or contact
- inability to provide good data or follow commands
- inability to do mild exercise
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Minnesota HealthSolutions Corporation (MHS) proposes to develop and evaluate a program to motivate and monitor people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to complete home exercise as part of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). The proposed system has two components: home-based activity monitoring and health coaching. The investigators will conduct a randomized, wait-list controlled clinical study to evaluate the effects of the activity monitoring system and health coaching on quality of life and daily steps.
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Being tested
- health coaching
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
health coachingBehavioural
Supportive coaching to encourage compliance with prescribed pulmonary rehabilitation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Activity Monitor plus Health Coaching | Experimental | Device: Actigraph Participants will wear the device daily during weeks 1, 9, and 17. Daily steps and activity will be measured. It will identify if they complete a prescribed exercise regimen. Participants in the intervention condition (wearing the Actigraph) will also receive supportive health coaching to encourage them to exercise. Receives: Behavioral: health coaching |
| Control | No intervention | Device: Actigraph Participants will wear the device daily during weeks 1, 9, and 17. Daily steps and activity will be measured. It will identify if they complete a prescribed exercise regimen. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Number of Daily Steps Between the Intervention and Control Conditions
Number of daily steps as measured by the SenseWear Pro ArmBand, which is an accepted criterion measure for daily physical activity in adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Measured: Steps measured at baseline (week 1) and week 9
Change in Physical Quality of Life Between the Intervention and Control Conditions
Measure Description: The Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire measures physical and emotional aspects with 20 items in four domains/categories. The two domains/categories used for physical summary were dyspnea and fatigue. The items are assessed numerically on a 7-point modified Likert scale (from 1 to 7). Scores are obtained by adding the scores for the items that make up each category and dividing by the number of items. Physical quality of life is obtained by adding the fatigue and dyspnea scores and dividing by two; hence, the score range is from 1 to 7. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life. Scores are obtained by adding the scores for the items that make up each category and dividing by the number of items. A minimally important difference is a change in score of 0.5 or more.
Measured: Quality of Life measured at baseline (week 1) and week 9
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2016
- Primary completionMar 2019
- Study completionMar 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 154 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sara Seifert
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Mayo Clinic
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Sara Seifert, Minnesota HealthSolutions
- Investigators
- Sara Seifert, MPH, Principal investigator, Minnesota HealthSolutions
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02557178
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R44HL114162-02A1
- Other IDs
- R44HL114162
- Status last verified
- Feb 2021
- First submitted
- 3 Mar 2015
- Last updated
- 24 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Benzo RP, Ridgeway J, Hoult JP, Novotny P, Thomas BE, Lam NM, V Benzo M, Kramer K, Seifert S. Feasibility of a Health Coaching and Home-Based Rehabilitation Intervention With Remote Monitoring for COPD. Respir Care. 2021 Jun;66(6):960-971. doi: 10.4187/respcare.08580. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
PubMed 33906954
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Home-Based Health Management of COPD Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02557178
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R44HL114162-02A1
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 154 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sara SeifertIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Mayo Clinic
- Study start
- Sep 2016
- Primary completion
- Mar 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Feb 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Minnesota HealthSolutions Corporation (MHS) proposes to develop and evaluate a program to motivate and monitor people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to complete home exercise as part of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). The proposed system has two components: home-based activity monitoring and health coaching. The investigators will conduct a randomized, wait-list controlled clinical study to evaluate the effects of the activity monitoring system and health coaching on quality of life and daily steps.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Activity Monitor plus Health Coaching | Experimental | Behavioral: health coachingDevice: Actigraph Participants will wear the device daily during weeks 1, 9, and 17. Daily steps and activity will be measured. It will identify if they complete a prescribed exercise regimen. Participants in the intervention condition (wearing the Actigraph) will also receive supportive health coaching to encourage them to exercise. |
| Control | No intervention | –Device: Actigraph Participants will wear the device daily during weeks 1, 9, and 17. Daily steps and activity will be measured. It will identify if they complete a prescribed exercise regimen. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- diagnosis of GOLD stage II, III, or IV COPD
- current or previous smoker with at least 10 pack-years of cigarette smoking
- be hospitalized for an exacerbation of COPD
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- high likelihood of being lost to follow-up or contact
- inability to provide good data or follow commands
- inability to do mild exercise
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| health coachingSupportive coaching to encourage compliance with prescribed pulmonary rehabilitation. | Behavioural | Activity Monitor plus Health Coaching |
Primary outcome
Change in Number of Daily Steps Between the Intervention and Control Conditions
Time frame: Steps measured at baseline (week 1) and week 9
Number of daily steps as measured by the SenseWear Pro ArmBand, which is an accepted criterion measure for daily physical activity in adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Change in Physical Quality of Life Between the Intervention and Control Conditions
Time frame: Quality of Life measured at baseline (week 1) and week 9
Measure Description: The Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire measures physical and emotional aspects with 20 items in four domains/categories. The two domains/categories used for physical summary were dyspnea and fatigue. The items are assessed numerically on a 7-point modified Likert scale (from 1 to 7). Scores are obtained by adding the scores for the items that make up each category and dividing by the number of items. Physical quality of life is obtained by adding the fatigue and dyspnea scores and dividing by two; hence, the score range is from 1 to 7. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life. Scores are obtained by adding the scores for the items that make up each category and dividing by the number of items. A minimally important difference is a change in score of 0.5 or more.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Feb 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33906954Benzo RP, Ridgeway J, Hoult JP, Novotny P, Thomas BE, Lam NM, V Benzo M, Kramer K, Seifert S. Feasibility of a Health Coaching and Home-Based Rehabilitation Intervention With Remote Monitoring for COPD. Respir Care. 2021 Jun;66(6):960-971. doi: 10.4187/respcare.08580. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of Treprostinil Administered Via Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sara Seifert, MPH principal investigator
Minnesota HealthSolutions
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing health coaching in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Sara Seifert at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Feb 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Number of Daily Steps Between the Intervention and Control Conditions (time frame: Steps measured at baseline (week 1) and week 9). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02557178, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Feb 2021.