InfluenzaNCT02559505
Influenza Immunity in Children
A study testing Seasonal IIV 0.25 mL dose, Natural influenza infection and Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL dose in people with Influenza, run by University of Rochester at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study evaluates how different methods of early exposure to influenza (natural infection, live attenuated influenza vaccination, inactivated influenza vaccination) initially stimulate immunity and poise the immune system to respond to a future challenge with the inactivated influenza vaccine. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 months to 8 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Influenza
- What is being tested?
- Seasonal IIV 0.25 mL dose, Natural influenza infection and Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL dose
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 134 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2015to 3 Jul 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 months to 8 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Age
- Between 6 and 12 months to participate in the vaccination arm of cohort 1 (cohort 1A)
- Between 3 and 12 months to participate in the natural infection arm of cohort 1 (cohort 1B)
- Between 13 and 35 months of age to participate in either the vaccination or natural infection arm of cohort 2
- Between 36 months and 5 years of age to participate in either the vaccination or natural infection arm of cohort 3
- Between 6 years and 8 years of age to participate in either the vaccination or natural infection arm of cohort 4
Show all 11Show fewer
- Gestational age of ≥37 weeks at birth
- Parent/guardian can provide informed consent
- Available for the duration of the study
- History of previous IIV administration ONLY for participation in the vaccination arm of cohorts 2, 3, or 4
- Acute illness documented to be due to influenza virus ONLY for participation in the natural infection arms of cohorts 1-4
Who cannot join
- Immunosuppression as a result of an underlying illness or condition (including HIV or a primary immunodeficiency syndrome)
- Active neoplastic disease
- Use of potentially immunosuppressive medications currently or within the past year (including chemotherapeutic agents) or chronic (>2 weeks) use of oral or inhaled steroid therapy
- A diagnosis of asthma requiring chronic controller medication
- Previous administration of influenza vaccine in the current influenza season ONLY for subjects receiving an influenza vaccination
- Receipt of immunoglobulin or another blood product within the year prior to study enrollment
- An acute illness within the previous 3 days or temperature >38o on screening EXCEPT for participation in the natural infection arms of cohorts 1-4
- A contraindication to influenza vaccination EXCEPT infants between 3 and 5 months presenting with natural influenza infection whose only contraindication is their current age
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Understanding How the Initial Encounter With Influenza Virus Poises Children for Protective Immunity
This study evaluates how different methods of early exposure to influenza (natural infection, live attenuated influenza vaccination, inactivated influenza vaccination) initially stimulate immunity and poise the immune system to respond to a future challenge with the inactivated influenza vaccine.
Read the detailed description
The proposed research addresses the fact that, despite high childhood morbidity from influenza and broad recommendations for vaccination, very little is known about how anti-influenza immunity is shaped by the method of initial exposure. The objective of this research is to understand how CD4 T cell and B cell responses are altered by the method of initial influenza priming, with the long-term goal of determining how a child's initial influenza encounter poises the immune system to respond to subsequent influenza challenges. The investigators central hypothesis is that differences in the mode of influenza antigen exposure in early childhood will generate long lasting, detectable changes in memory CD4 T cell and B cell specificity and function that influence the response to future influenza vaccinations and infections. This hypothesis will be tested by comparing 1) CD4 T cell and 2) antibody responses in cohorts of children initially exposed to influenza through either natural infection or inactivated or live attenuated vaccination. A combination of multiparameter assays will be used to determine the phenotype and functional potential of hemagglutinin (HA)- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells. The breadth and avidity of the neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibody responses and its distribution against head and stalk epitopes will also be evaluated. By determining how initial priming shapes the specificity and functional potential of the anti-influenza CD4 T cell and antibody responses, the investigators will gain the knowledge necessary to optimize current influenza vaccination strategies and develop novel influenza vaccines able to provide highly efficacious universal protection against both seasonal and potentially pandemic viral strains.
- Conditions
- Influenza
- Being tested
- Seasonal IIV 0.25 mL dose, Natural influenza infection, Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL dose
- Keywords
- natural influenza infection, live attenuated influenza vaccination (LAIV), inactivated influenza vaccination (IIV), infants, children
- Medical subject headings
- Influenza, Human
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Seasonal IIV 0.25 mL doseBiological
Also called Inactivated influenza vaccine
Fluzone (Sanofi Pasteur) 0.25 mL administered intramuscularly to children between 6 and 35 months of age
Natural influenza infectionOther
Children enrolled on presentation to their primary care provider with a natural influenza infection
Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL doseBiological
Also called inactivated influenza vaccine
Fluzone (Sanofi Pasteur) 0.25 mL administered intramuscularly to children between 6 and 35 months of age
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 6-12 months Seasonal IIV | Experimental | Children 6 - 12 months of age vaccinated with seasonal IIV Receives: Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.25 mL dose |
| 3-12 months natural infection | Experimental | Children 3-12 months of age presenting with natural influenza infection Receives: Other: Natural influenza infection; Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL dose |
| 13-35 months Seasonal IIV | Experimental | Children 13-35 months of age vaccinated with seasonal IIV Receives: Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.25 mL dose |
| 13-35 months natural infection | Experimental | Children 13-35 months of age presenting with natural influenza infection Receives: Other: Natural influenza infection; Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL dose |
| 3-5 years Seasonal IIV | Experimental | Children 3-5 years of age vaccinated with seasonal IIV Receives: Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL dose |
| 3-5 years natural infection | Experimental | Children 3-5 years of age presenting with natural influenza infection Receives: Other: Natural influenza infection; Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL dose |
| 6-8 years Seasonal IIV | Experimental | Children 6-8 years of age vaccinated with seasonal IIV Receives: Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL dose |
| 6-8 years natural infection | Experimental | Children 6-8 years of age presenting with natural influenza infection Receives: Other: Natural influenza infection; Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL dose |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects
% H3- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells were measured using intracellular cytokine staining
Measured: Visit 2 (day 8-14 post enrollment)
Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects
% H3- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells were measured using intracellular cytokine staining
Measured: Visit 3 (day 20-28 post enrollment)
Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects
% H3- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells were measured using intracellular cytokine staining
Measured: Visit 4 (day of vaccination year 2)
Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects
% H3 protein- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells were measured using intracellular cytokine staining
Measured: Visit 5 (day 8-14 post-vaccination year 2)
Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects
% H3 Protein- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells were measured using intracellular cytokine staining
Measured: Visit 6 (day 20-28 post-vaccination year 2)
Secondary outcomes (2)
Mean Change in Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Vaccinated Subjects in Different Age Subsets
CD4 T cell quantity and specificity will be measured using intracellular cytokine staining. We report here the mean change in percent of cells reactive to the influenza HA protein and H3 protein.
Measured: Baseline to day 24 study year 1
Mean Change in Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Vaccinated Subjects in Different Age Subsets
CD4 T cell quantity and specificity will be measured using intracellular cytokine staining. We report here the mean change in percent of cells reactive to the influenza HA protein and H3 protein.
Measured: Baseline to day 24 study year 2
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2015
- Primary completion3 Jul 2020
- Study completion3 Jul 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for InfluenzaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 134 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Rochester
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jennifer Nayak, University of Rochester
- Investigators
- Jennifer L Nayak, MD, Principal investigator, University of Rochester
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02559505
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RSRB00058437
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 18 Sep 2015
- Last updated
- 2 Sep 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Shannon I, White CL, Yang H, Nayak JL. Differences in Influenza-Specific CD4 T-Cell Mediated Immunity Following Acute Infection Versus Inactivated Vaccination in Children. J Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 15;223(12):2164-2173. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa664.
PubMed 33074330
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Sep 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Understanding How the Initial Encounter With Influenza Virus Poises Children for Protective Immunity
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02559505
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RSRB00058437
- Conditions
- Influenza
- Keywords
- natural influenza infection, live attenuated influenza vaccination (LAIV), inactivated influenza vaccination (IIV), infants, children
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 134 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of RochesterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Jul 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Sep 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 2 Sep 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates how different methods of early exposure to influenza (natural infection, live attenuated influenza vaccination, inactivated influenza vaccination) initially stimulate immunity and poise the immune system to respond to a future challenge with the inactivated influenza vaccine.
Detailed description
The proposed research addresses the fact that, despite high childhood morbidity from influenza and broad recommendations for vaccination, very little is known about how anti-influenza immunity is shaped by the method of initial exposure. The objective of this research is to understand how CD4 T cell and B cell responses are altered by the method of initial influenza priming, with the long-term goal of determining how a child's initial influenza encounter poises the immune system to respond to subsequent influenza challenges. The investigators central hypothesis is that differences in the mode of influenza antigen exposure in early childhood will generate long lasting, detectable changes in memory CD4 T cell and B cell specificity and function that influence the response to future influenza vaccinations and infections. This hypothesis will be tested by comparing 1) CD4 T cell and 2) antibody responses in cohorts of children initially exposed to influenza through either natural infection or inactivated or live attenuated vaccination. A combination of multiparameter assays will be used to determine the phenotype and functional potential of hemagglutinin (HA)- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells. The breadth and avidity of the neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibody responses and its distribution against head and stalk epitopes will also be evaluated. By determining how initial priming shapes the specificity and functional potential of the anti-influenza CD4 T cell and antibody responses, the investigators will gain the knowledge necessary to optimize current influenza vaccination strategies and develop novel influenza vaccines able to provide highly efficacious universal protection against both seasonal and potentially pandemic viral strains.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 8
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 6-12 months Seasonal IIV | Experimental | Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.25 mL doseChildren 6 - 12 months of age vaccinated with seasonal IIV |
| 3-12 months natural infection | Experimental | Other: Natural influenza infection, Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL doseChildren 3-12 months of age presenting with natural influenza infection |
| 13-35 months Seasonal IIV | Experimental | Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.25 mL doseChildren 13-35 months of age vaccinated with seasonal IIV |
| 13-35 months natural infection | Experimental | Other: Natural influenza infection, Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL doseChildren 13-35 months of age presenting with natural influenza infection |
| 3-5 years Seasonal IIV | Experimental | Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL doseChildren 3-5 years of age vaccinated with seasonal IIV |
| 3-5 years natural infection | Experimental | Other: Natural influenza infection, Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL doseChildren 3-5 years of age presenting with natural influenza infection |
| 6-8 years Seasonal IIV | Experimental | Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL doseChildren 6-8 years of age vaccinated with seasonal IIV |
| 6-8 years natural infection | Experimental | Other: Natural influenza infection, Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL doseChildren 6-8 years of age presenting with natural influenza infection |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 months to 8 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Age
- Gestational age of ≥37 weeks at birth
- Parent/guardian can provide informed consent
- Available for the duration of the study
- History of previous IIV administration ONLY for participation in the vaccination arm of cohorts 2, 3, or 4
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Immunosuppression as a result of an underlying illness or condition (including HIV or a primary immunodeficiency syndrome)
- Active neoplastic disease
- Use of potentially immunosuppressive medications currently or within the past year (including chemotherapeutic agents) or chronic (>2 weeks) use of oral or inhaled steroid therapy
- A diagnosis of asthma requiring chronic controller medication
- Previous administration of influenza vaccine in the current influenza season ONLY for subjects receiving an influenza vaccination
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Seasonal IIV 0.25 mL doseAlso: Inactivated influenza vaccineFluzone (Sanofi Pasteur) 0.25 mL administered intramuscularly to children between 6 and 35 months of age | Biological | 13-35 months Seasonal IIV, 6-12 months Seasonal IIV |
| Natural influenza infectionChildren enrolled on presentation to their primary care provider with a natural influenza infection | Other | 13-35 months natural infection, 3-12 months natural infection, 3-5 years natural infection, 6-8 years natural infection |
| Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL doseAlso: inactivated influenza vaccineFluzone (Sanofi Pasteur) 0.25 mL administered intramuscularly to children between 6 and 35 months of age | Biological | 13-35 months natural infection, 3-12 months natural infection, 3-5 years Seasonal IIV, 3-5 years natural infection, 6-8 years Seasonal IIV, 6-8 years natural infection |
Primary outcome
Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects
Time frame: Visit 2 (day 8-14 post enrollment)
% H3- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells were measured using intracellular cytokine staining
Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects
Time frame: Visit 3 (day 20-28 post enrollment)
% H3- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells were measured using intracellular cytokine staining
Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects
Time frame: Visit 4 (day of vaccination year 2)
% H3- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells were measured using intracellular cytokine staining
Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects
Time frame: Visit 5 (day 8-14 post-vaccination year 2)
% H3 protein- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells were measured using intracellular cytokine staining
Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects
Time frame: Visit 6 (day 20-28 post-vaccination year 2)
% H3 Protein- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells were measured using intracellular cytokine staining
2 secondary outcomes
Mean Change in Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Vaccinated Subjects in Different Age Subsets
Time frame: Baseline to day 24 study year 1
Mean Change in Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Vaccinated Subjects in Different Age Subsets
Time frame: Baseline to day 24 study year 2
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Sep 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33074330Shannon I, White CL, Yang H, Nayak JL. Differences in Influenza-Specific CD4 T-Cell Mediated Immunity Following Acute Infection Versus Inactivated Vaccination in Children. J Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 15;223(12):2164-2173. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa664.
Related trials for Influenza
RecruitingPhase 2
BPL-1357 Against H1N1 Influenza Virus Challenge
Influenza, Human
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Immunogenicity of Chimeric Hemagglutinin mRNA Vaccine Candidates
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Tozorakimab in Patients Hospitalised for Viral Lung Infection Requiring Supplemental Oxygen
Viral Lung Infection and Acute Respiratory Failure
RecruitingObservational study
Screening for LID Clinical Studies Unit Healthy Volunteer Protocols
Zika, Influenza
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Long-term Observation of Hemagglutinin and Neuraminidase Inhibition Antibody Titers After Influenza Challenge
Post Influenza
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jennifer L Nayak, MD principal investigator
University of Rochester
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Seasonal IIV 0.25 mL dose, Natural influenza infection and Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL dose in people with Influenza, run by University of Rochester at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Sep 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects (time frame: Visit 2 (day 8-14 post enrollment)). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02559505, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Sep 2021.