AzTrials
AzTrials

InfluenzaNCT02559505

Influenza Immunity in Children

A study testing Seasonal IIV 0.25 mL dose, Natural influenza infection and Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL dose in people with Influenza, run by University of Rochester at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates how different methods of early exposure to influenza (natural infection, live attenuated influenza vaccination, inactivated influenza vaccination) initially stimulate immunity and poise the immune system to respond to a future challenge with the inactivated influenza vaccine. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 months to 8 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Influenza
What is being tested?
Seasonal IIV 0.25 mL dose, Natural influenza infection and Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL dose
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
134 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2015to 3 Jul 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 months to 8 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Age
  • Between 6 and 12 months to participate in the vaccination arm of cohort 1 (cohort 1A)
  • Between 3 and 12 months to participate in the natural infection arm of cohort 1 (cohort 1B)
  • Between 13 and 35 months of age to participate in either the vaccination or natural infection arm of cohort 2
  • Between 36 months and 5 years of age to participate in either the vaccination or natural infection arm of cohort 3
  • Between 6 years and 8 years of age to participate in either the vaccination or natural infection arm of cohort 4
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Gestational age of ≥37 weeks at birth
  • Parent/guardian can provide informed consent
  • Available for the duration of the study
  • History of previous IIV administration ONLY for participation in the vaccination arm of cohorts 2, 3, or 4
  • Acute illness documented to be due to influenza virus ONLY for participation in the natural infection arms of cohorts 1-4

Who cannot join

  • Immunosuppression as a result of an underlying illness or condition (including HIV or a primary immunodeficiency syndrome)
  • Active neoplastic disease
  • Use of potentially immunosuppressive medications currently or within the past year (including chemotherapeutic agents) or chronic (>2 weeks) use of oral or inhaled steroid therapy
  • A diagnosis of asthma requiring chronic controller medication
  • Previous administration of influenza vaccine in the current influenza season ONLY for subjects receiving an influenza vaccination
  • Receipt of immunoglobulin or another blood product within the year prior to study enrollment
  • An acute illness within the previous 3 days or temperature >38o on screening EXCEPT for participation in the natural infection arms of cohorts 1-4
  • A contraindication to influenza vaccination EXCEPT infants between 3 and 5 months presenting with natural influenza infection whose only contraindication is their current age

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Rochester

    Rochester, New York, 14642

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Understanding How the Initial Encounter With Influenza Virus Poises Children for Protective Immunity

This study evaluates how different methods of early exposure to influenza (natural infection, live attenuated influenza vaccination, inactivated influenza vaccination) initially stimulate immunity and poise the immune system to respond to a future challenge with the inactivated influenza vaccine.

Read the detailed description

The proposed research addresses the fact that, despite high childhood morbidity from influenza and broad recommendations for vaccination, very little is known about how anti-influenza immunity is shaped by the method of initial exposure. The objective of this research is to understand how CD4 T cell and B cell responses are altered by the method of initial influenza priming, with the long-term goal of determining how a child's initial influenza encounter poises the immune system to respond to subsequent influenza challenges. The investigators central hypothesis is that differences in the mode of influenza antigen exposure in early childhood will generate long lasting, detectable changes in memory CD4 T cell and B cell specificity and function that influence the response to future influenza vaccinations and infections. This hypothesis will be tested by comparing 1) CD4 T cell and 2) antibody responses in cohorts of children initially exposed to influenza through either natural infection or inactivated or live attenuated vaccination. A combination of multiparameter assays will be used to determine the phenotype and functional potential of hemagglutinin (HA)- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells. The breadth and avidity of the neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibody responses and its distribution against head and stalk epitopes will also be evaluated. By determining how initial priming shapes the specificity and functional potential of the anti-influenza CD4 T cell and antibody responses, the investigators will gain the knowledge necessary to optimize current influenza vaccination strategies and develop novel influenza vaccines able to provide highly efficacious universal protection against both seasonal and potentially pandemic viral strains.

Conditions
Influenza
Being tested
Seasonal IIV 0.25 mL dose, Natural influenza infection, Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL dose
Keywords
natural influenza infection, live attenuated influenza vaccination (LAIV), inactivated influenza vaccination (IIV), infants, children
Medical subject headings
Influenza, Human

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Seasonal IIV 0.25 mL doseBiological

    Also called Inactivated influenza vaccine

    Fluzone (Sanofi Pasteur) 0.25 mL administered intramuscularly to children between 6 and 35 months of age

  • Natural influenza infectionOther

    Children enrolled on presentation to their primary care provider with a natural influenza infection

  • Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL doseBiological

    Also called inactivated influenza vaccine

    Fluzone (Sanofi Pasteur) 0.25 mL administered intramuscularly to children between 6 and 35 months of age

Study groups in NCT02559505
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
6-12 months Seasonal IIVExperimentalChildren 6 - 12 months of age vaccinated with seasonal IIV
Receives: Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.25 mL dose
3-12 months natural infectionExperimentalChildren 3-12 months of age presenting with natural influenza infection
Receives: Other: Natural influenza infection; Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL dose
13-35 months Seasonal IIVExperimentalChildren 13-35 months of age vaccinated with seasonal IIV
Receives: Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.25 mL dose
13-35 months natural infectionExperimentalChildren 13-35 months of age presenting with natural influenza infection
Receives: Other: Natural influenza infection; Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL dose
3-5 years Seasonal IIVExperimentalChildren 3-5 years of age vaccinated with seasonal IIV
Receives: Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL dose
3-5 years natural infectionExperimentalChildren 3-5 years of age presenting with natural influenza infection
Receives: Other: Natural influenza infection; Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL dose
6-8 years Seasonal IIVExperimentalChildren 6-8 years of age vaccinated with seasonal IIV
Receives: Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL dose
6-8 years natural infectionExperimentalChildren 6-8 years of age presenting with natural influenza infection
Receives: Other: Natural influenza infection; Biological: Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL dose

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects

    % H3- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells were measured using intracellular cytokine staining

    Measured: Visit 2 (day 8-14 post enrollment)

  2. Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects

    % H3- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells were measured using intracellular cytokine staining

    Measured: Visit 3 (day 20-28 post enrollment)

  3. Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects

    % H3- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells were measured using intracellular cytokine staining

    Measured: Visit 4 (day of vaccination year 2)

  4. Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects

    % H3 protein- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells were measured using intracellular cytokine staining

    Measured: Visit 5 (day 8-14 post-vaccination year 2)

  5. Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects

    % H3 Protein- and nucleoprotein (NP)-specific CD4 T cells were measured using intracellular cytokine staining

    Measured: Visit 6 (day 20-28 post-vaccination year 2)

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Mean Change in Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Vaccinated Subjects in Different Age Subsets

    CD4 T cell quantity and specificity will be measured using intracellular cytokine staining. We report here the mean change in percent of cells reactive to the influenza HA protein and H3 protein.

    Measured: Baseline to day 24 study year 1

  2. Mean Change in Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Vaccinated Subjects in Different Age Subsets

    CD4 T cell quantity and specificity will be measured using intracellular cytokine staining. We report here the mean change in percent of cells reactive to the influenza HA protein and H3 protein.

    Measured: Baseline to day 24 study year 2

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Sep 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2015
  3. Primary completion3 Jul 2020
  4. Study completion3 Jul 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
134 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02559505
Sponsor's protocol ID
RSRB00058437
Status last verified
Aug 2021
First submitted
18 Sep 2015
Last updated
2 Sep 2021
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Shannon I, White CL, Yang H, Nayak JL. Differences in Influenza-Specific CD4 T-Cell Mediated Immunity Following Acute Infection Versus Inactivated Vaccination in Children. J Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 15;223(12):2164-2173. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa664.

    PubMed 33074330

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Seasonal IIV 0.25 mL dose, Natural influenza infection and Seasonal IIV 0.5 mL dose in people with Influenza, run by University of Rochester at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Sep 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean Percent of IFNg+ CD69+ CD4 T Cells Between Acute (H3N2) Infected and Vaccinated Subjects (time frame: Visit 2 (day 8-14 post enrollment)). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02559505, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Sep 2021.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in