AzTrials
AzTrials

Familial Pancreatic CancerUNIFYNCT02560896

Understanding Genetic Incidental Findings in Your Family (UNIFY Study)

An observational study of Familial Pancreatic Cancer, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Currently, there is no clear legal or ethical guidance about how researchers and IRBs ought to proceed when the research participant in a biobank is deceased and there is clinically relevant information that could be disclosed to family members. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Familial Pancreatic Cancer
How many people
12 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2015to 4 Nov 2019
How long will I take part?
6 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Familial Pancreatic Cancer Kindred

Family members and others authorized to receive health information of participants enrolled under Institutional Review Board (IRB) #354-06 and #355-06 who carry one of several known cancer susceptibility genes.

  • Mentally competent and able to provide informed consent
  • Able to understand and read English

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Genomic Incidental Findings Disclosure (GIFD) in a Cancer Biobank: An Ethical, Legal and Social Implications (ELSI) Experiment (Protocol for Aim 3 Intervention)

Currently, there is no clear legal or ethical guidance about how researchers and IRBs ought to proceed when the research participant in a biobank is deceased and there is clinically relevant information that could be disclosed to family members. This study is designed to test a procedure offering genetic information to family members of research participants who participated in a pancreatic cancer biobank in a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) -compliant design.

Read the detailed description

To develop, prototype, and evaluate a novel procedure for offering probands' genetic results to family members. The intervention is to offer a deceased research participant's actionable germline genetic research finding, and depending upon the choice made by the next of kin, a disclosure of the research finding by a genetic counselor in a family conference call. Using mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative), the investigators will assess decision making, family communication, and actions and responses in individuals from families in which a proband is known to have a deleterious germline mutation in one of several known cancer susceptibility genes.

Keywords
Family, History, Pancreas, Cancer, Genetic
Medical subject headings
Pancreatic carcinoma, familial, Neoplasms

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Uptake of disclosure invitation

    The primary outcome is: relative proportions of individuals who, when offered genetic results of a deceased family member who participated in a biobank study, will decide to learn those results. Uptake will be a binary outcome (Yes/No). We will enumerate the number of invited participants who choose to learn results and who choose not to learn results.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Frequency and duration of physical activity

    We will measure and compare changes between baseline and 6 months following genetic test disclosure: number of self-reported days per week and exercise duration(minutes).

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Frequency and duration of alcohol use

    We will measure and compare changes between baseline and 6 months following genetic test disclosure: number of drinks containing alcohol taken per week over previous six months; frequency drinking 6 or more drinks in one occasion in past 6 months (Never; Less than monthly; Monthly; 2 to 3 times per week; 4 or more times per week)

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Current cigarette smoking status

    We will measure and compare changes between baseline and 6 months following genetic test disclosure: Current cigarette smoker (Yes/No)

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Quality and amount of sleep

    We will measure and compare changes between baseline and 6 months following genetic test disclosure: Quality of sleep (Very good; Fairly good; Fairly bad; Very bad); Number of hours of sleep in a 24 hour period (hours and minutes)

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Frequency of fruit and vegetable consumption

    We will measure and compare changes between baseline and 6 months following genetic test disclosure: Number of servings eaten in a typical day (None; 1 or less; 2; 3; 4; 5 or more)

    Measured: 6 months

  6. Frequency of red meat consumption

    We will measure and compare changes between baseline and 6 months following genetic test disclosure: Number of times consumed per typical week (0; 1 to 5; 6 to 10; 11 to 15; 16 to 20; 21 or more).

    Measured: 6 months

  7. Uptake of genetic testing

    The relative proportion of individuals who request and obtain genetic testing on their own by 6 months

    Measured: 6 months

  8. Quality of life

    Changes in self-reported quality of life on a scale of 0(a bad as it can be) to 10 (as good as it can be)

    Measured: 6 months

  9. Perceived cancer risk/worry

    Changes in self-reported worry of developing cancer on a scale of 1 (not at all or rarely to 4 (almost all the time)

    Measured: 6 months

  10. Decision regret

    Self-reported rating of regret to learn/not learn their relative's genetic research result using a 5-item scale rating (Strongly agree to Strongly disagree).

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Sep 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2015
  3. Primary completion4 Nov 2019
  4. Study completion4 Nov 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Family based
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
12 participants (actual)
Target duration
6 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02560896
Sponsor's protocol ID
15-001209
Acronym
UNIFY
Status last verified
Jun 2023
First submitted
27 Aug 2015
Last updated
6 Jun 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Familial Pancreatic Cancer, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Uptake of disclosure invitation (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in