AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyNCT02563015

Can Correction of Low Vitamin D Status in Infancy Program for a Leaner Body Composition?

A study testing cholecalciferol and Reference 400 in people with Healthy and Vitamin D Deficiency, run by McGill University at 1 site in Canada.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

One in four infants are born with low amounts of vitamin D stored in their body. This study is designed to test whether improving vitamin D status quickly after birth helps infants to build muscle and to normalize growth. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 1 weekHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
cholecalciferol and Reference 400
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
139 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
7 Mar 2016to 20 Sep 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 1 week
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Term;
  • Healthy;
  • Appropriate weight for gestational age;
  • Infants born to mothers with otherwise healthy pregnancy and free of medications that impact vitamin D metabolism (except vitamin/mineral supplements) or fetal growth and intent to breastfeed to at least 3 months;
  • Infants born to mothers with gestational diabetes (screened for vitamin D status at birth and randomized to 400 or 1000 IU/d vitamin D under an ancillary arm of this study following the same protocol).

Who cannot join

  • Preterm;
  • Small for gestational age;
  • Maternal smoking in pregnancy, diabetes (types 1 or 2), preeclampsia, celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease and medications that impact vitamin D/mineral metabolism.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Mary Emily Clinical Nutrition Research Unit

    Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, H9X 2E3

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Novel Functional Outcomes of Vitamin D in Infancy; Can Correction of Low Vitamin D Status Program for a Leaner Body Composition Phenotype?

One in four infants are born with low amounts of vitamin D stored in their body. This study is designed to test whether improving vitamin D status quickly after birth helps infants to build muscle and to normalize growth. This is important since the investigators have noticed in previous work that infants with low vitamin D have higher body weight relative to body length later on and that those who develop very good stores quickly have a leaner body type. Therefore, in this study infants with low stores early after birth will be given either the regular amount of supplementation or a higher amount to more rapidly build up the vitamin stores in the body. Infants in both groups will be measured for muscle and fat mass at standardized ages during the first year of life and into the toddler years. The information will inform health care professionals and parents of the importance of establishing good vitamin D stores early in life. Vitamin D supplementation is a modifiable factor that is already recommended for all term born infants. Knowing how much is needed in infants born with low stores has not been tested in a controlled manner in Canada.

Read the detailed description

Primary Trial Objective: To test whether rapid correction of vitamin D status early in the neonatal period results in greater lean mass in infancy.

It is hypothesized that neonates with low vitamin D status and provided a vitamin D supplement of 400 IU/d will have lower accretion of lean mass by 3 mo of age and thereafter by 12 months compared to infants given 1000 IU/d for the trial; and that this difference would be sustained up to 3 years after the trial at the post-trial follow-up phase.

Secondary Trial Objectives are designed a priori to test:

  1. Whether correction of low vitamin D status early in infancy using 1000 IU/d of vitamin D normalizes body composition (lean, fat, bone mass) and biomarkers across infancy; and for the follow-up (also referred to follow-on) study up to 3 y of age;
  2. Epigenetic mechanisms related to vitamin D metabolism and body composition that clarify how improving vitamin D status with 1000 IU/d of supplementation regulates the musculoskeletal system.

Tertiary Objective: outside of the trial, establish a healthy reference group with good neonatal vitamin D stores (>50 nmol/L 25(OH)D) and given 400 IU vitamin D/d with all of the same measurements as the trial since these are not all available (e.g. IGF-1, IGFBP3 using same assays).

The primary end-point is 12 months of age for the trial. The post-trial follow-up (also known as follow-on) study is up to 3 years with data obtained at 2 and 3 years of age.

The secondary outcomes include other variables: body composition including whole body fat mass, whole body bone mineral content, lumbar spine bone mineral content and density along with biomarkers related to vitamin D status, growth and bone.

Neonates from hospitals in the greater Montreal area will be studied. Neonates will be screened for low vitamin D status within 48 h of birth for 25(OH)D to enable rapid entry into study groups. Those with serum 25(OH)D <50 nmol/L will be randomized to 400 or 1000 IU/d until 1 y of age. Those with 25(OH)D >50 nmol/L will be provided standard of care (400 IU/d) and form a reference group.

Treatment period: Trial is 1 week to 12 months of age; follow-up to 3 years of age.

Frequency and duration of follow up: 1 week (baseline), 3, 6 and 12 months of age for the trial; then for the follow-on (also referred to as follow-up study) 2 and 3 years of age for the follow-up visits.

At baseline (1 wk), 3, 6, 12 for the trial plus post-trial at 24 and 36 mo of age, infants will be seen at our research unit for measurement of anthropometry, body composition and bone as well as blood sampling, skin pigmentation and surveys for diet, developmental milestones, activity and demographic information.

Anthropometry - All measurements in infancy will be obtained nude and for 24 to 36 mo the child wearing standardized light clothing, dry diaper and no shoes. Weight will be taken using an electronic scale with a dynamic weighing program (Mettler-Toledo Inc., Switzerland). Length (0.1 cm) will be measured using an infantometer until 24 mo of age (O'Learly Length Boards, Ellard Instrumentation Ltd., US) and height at 36 mo will be measured using a stadiometer (Seca Medical Scales and Measuring Systems, US). Head circumference will be measured (0.1 cm) using a non-stretchable tape (Perspective Enterprises, US) to complete the anthropometric panel. Weight-for-age, height-for-age, and BMI-for-age Z-sores will be calculated using WHO software (WHO AnthroPlus, Switzerland). Mother's weight and height will be measured, while she is still breastfeeding, wearing standard clothing using a calibrated balance-beam scale (Detecto, Webb City, MO, USA) and a wall-mounted stadiometer (Seca model 226; new manufacturer Ayrton226 Hite-Rite Precision Mechanical Stadiometer) to calculate BMI.

Body Composition Measurements - Body composition will be assessed using a fan-beam DXA (APEX version 13.3:3, Hologic 4500A Discovery Series, Bedford, MA). Each infant will wear a light sleeper with no metal or plastic components and a diaper and be scanned using the infant whole body software; at 24 and 36 mo standardized light clothing will be worn and scans captured using whole body software. Whole body scans provide lean mass (g and % of weight), fat mass (g and %), BMC and BMD. Lumbar vertebra 1-4 and forearm BMC and BMD will be captured. Mother's body composition will be measured, while she is still breastfeeding, using BIA (Foot-to-foot tetrapolar Tanita TBF-310, Tanita Corp., Tokyo, Japan) as a rapid assessment.

Biochemistry Measurements - Capillary blood samples (0.5 ml) will be collected at screening; but venous sampling (1.0 ml: yields ~500-600 μl serum) used thereafter; samples will be centrifuged (2235 x g for 20 min at 4°C) to obtain serum (for biochemistry) and buffy coat (white blood cells for DNA) and stored frozen at -80°C until analysis. One 5 ml sample will be taken from parents at baseline (fasting) for measurement of serum 25(OH)D and buffy coat saved for future epigenetic work. For infant screening and maternal serum, total 25(OH)D will be measured using a dedicated auto-analyzer in the PI's laboratory (25 μl; 150 μl "dead volume" that is recovered, Liaison Diasorin Inc.); this assay will also be used for safety assessments at 3 and 6 mo, but is not to be used in analyzing the trial data outcomes as it does not capture all of the metabolites. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS by Dr. Jones', Queen's Univ.) will be used to measure of 25(OH)D3, 3-epi- 25(OH)D3, and 24,25(OH)2D for all time-points from baseline to 36 mo. In addition, 1,25(OH)2D (100 μl serum) will be similarly measured using an adapted LC-MS/MS method. Both laboratories are certificated by the Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme and will continue to participate in the National Institute of Standards and Technology quality assurance program. Blood-ionized calcium will be measured immediately using our portable unit (ABL80 FLEX Radiometer Medical A/S, Denmark) and compared to published standards (90). Remaining sample will be used for IGF-1 (20 μl) using Liaison (Diasorin Inc.); PTH (25 μl; Immutopics Inc CAT#60-3100) and IGFBP3 (20 μl; R\&D Systems CAT#SGB300) will be measured by ELISA. Sample for IGFBP3 will be pre-treated with protease inhibitors prior to storage. Plasma total calcium and phosphate (150 μl) and urinary calcium and phosphate:creatinine will be measured in a spot sample collected at each visit during the trial; Beckman Coulter UniCel DxC600 autoanalyzer. We will reserve remaining sample for later measurement of C-telepeptide, propeptide of type 1 collagen (P1NP) as biomarkers related to bone.

Demographic, Dietary and Activity Surveys - At screening/baseline, parents will be asked to complete a demographic survey regarding their anthropometry, ethnicity and race, income and education using the same descriptors as defined by Statistics Canada. Infant dietary intake over the study period will be assessed using 3-day diet records completed by parents after each visit. While infants are breastfed, milk intake will be assessed by test-weighing of the infant before and after breast feeding for a 24-hour period using a portable electronic scale (Tanita Corporation Inc., US). This will provide nutrient intakes to help explain growth. Dietary intake from other foods is documented using household measurement items and recorded on the 3-day record. All nutrient analysis will be completed using the Nutritionist Pro software version 4.7.0 (Axxya Systems LLC, Stafford, TX) and the most recent Canadian Nutrient File database (Health Canada). At 2 and 3 y of age, the Habitual Activity Estimation Scale Questionnaire (HAES) will be completed by parents for a weekday (Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday) and weekend day (Saturday) over the past 2 weeks. Parents divide their child's day into 4 segments (wake-up to breakfast, breakfast to lunch, lunch to dinner, dinner to bedtime). For each time interval, the % time spent in each activity level is used to estimate overall level of physical activity. The 4 activity levels as established by the HAES questionnaire are: "inactive" (lying down, sleeping, resting), "somewhat inactive" (sitting, watching television, activities done mostly sitting down), "somewhat active" (walking, playing with toys), and "very active" (activities that make a child "breathe hard and sweat," like running and skipping). Developmental milestones are surveyed at each visit (e.g. walking). In 2017, the parent-administered general development screening tool was added to the post-trial design of the study. We used Ages and Stages Questionnaire (24, and 36 months) to complement the activity survey.

Skin pigmentation and UVB exposure - Skin color (type) for the infant will be established by taking the average of three measurements at each site for constitutive pigmentation at the inner upper arm and facultative pigmentation (UVB exposure) at the forehead, mid-forearm and lower leg using a spectrophotometer (CM-700d/600d, Konica Minolta, USA). Individual typological angle (ITAo) will be calculated with the L* and b* values. Using constitutive pigmentation, infants will be classified into skin types (I-III: white; IV-VI: non-white) based on Fitzpatrick descriptions. Sun exposure, winter travel and use of sun block will also be surveyed. Sun exposure is expressed as a percentage of body surface area (BSA) exposed and then sun index calculated for each child by multiplying the percent BSA exposed by the time spent outside (min/d); this index does not include sun block.

Sample Size and Statistical Analyses Sample size: up to 74 infants per trial group. The minimum sample size (n=46) is based on the primary objective, lean mass (effect size of 0.59, SD of 670 g), an allocation ratio of 1:1, power of 80 and alpha of 0.05.

Intent-to-treat analyses. For the primary outcome, one analysis will be conducted on blinded groups after all infants have completed 12 months of study; and a second analysis again at 3 y. We wish to keep all of the staff blinded across the entire trial. All trial data will be audited and analyzed blinded; unblinding of the trial data will occur only after statistical analyses are complete. Baseline characteristics will be expressed as mean (SD or 95%CI) or median (IQR) depending on normality for continuous data or as proportions for ordinal data (e.g. sex). Continuous data for the primary outcome will be examined using mixed-effects regression model accounting for fixed effects (strata for allocation skin color, sex; plus dosage, time and demographic covariates) and random effects (modeled on participant ID); a similar model will be used for other outcomes. For the follow-on study for data at 2 and/or 3 years we will test whether any benefits as observed by the end of the trial were maintained using a similar mixed-effects model with additional time-points added to the model.

Being tested
cholecalciferol, Reference 400
Keywords
Infant, Vitamin D, Deficiency, Lean Mass
Medical subject headings
Vitamin D Deficiency, Diabetes, Gestational

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • cholecalciferolDietary supplement

    Also called vitamin D3

    liquid drops

  • Reference 400Dietary supplement

    Also called vitaminD3

    liquid drops

Study groups in NCT02563015
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cholecalciferol 400Experimental400 IU orally per day
Receives: Dietary Supplement: cholecalciferol
Cholecalciferol 1000Experimental1000 IU orally per day
Receives: Dietary Supplement: cholecalciferol
Reference 400Active comparator400 IU orally per day
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Reference 400

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Lean mass

    Whole body lean mass

    Measured: Trial phase is 1-12 months with primary end-point of 12 months. The follow-on study is up to 3 years.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. 25(OH)D, body composition (lean, fat, bone), bone density, biomarkers of vitamin D status, growth and bone.

    Concentration of serum 25(OH)D; along with body composition including whole body fat mass, whole body bone mineral content, lumbar spine bone mineral content and density complemented by biomarkers related to vitamin D status (e.g. iCa, PTH, urinary Ca:creatinine), growth and bone.

    Measured: Trial phase 1-12 months; follow-on study up to 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Sep 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start7 Mar 2016
  3. Primary completion20 Sep 2020
  4. Study completion20 Sep 2020

Why it stopped: Covid19 pandemic prevented continuation of study visits

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
139 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02563015
Sponsor's protocol ID
HW-15-01
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
28 Sep 2015
Last updated
11 Jun 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Razaghi M, Gharibeh N, Vanstone CA, Wei SQ, McNally D, Rauch F, Jones G, Heinonen K, Weiler HA. Can correction of low vitamin D status in infancy program for a leaner body composition? A posttrial follow-up study of whole body lean mass in early childhood. Am J Clin Nutr. 2025 Nov;122(5):1338-1350. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.09.002. Epub 2025 Sep 9.

    PubMed 40935152
  • Gharibeh N, Razaghi M, Vanstone CA, Sotunde OF, Glenn L, Mullahoo K, Farahnak Z, Khamessan A, Wei SQ, McNally D, Rauch F, Jones G, Kaufmann M, Weiler HA. Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Bone Mass in Infants With 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations Less Than 50 nmol/L: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2023 Apr 1;177(4):353-362. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.5837.

    PubMed 36780180
  • Weiler HA, Attar A, Farahnak Z, Sotunde OF, Razaghi M, Gharibeh N, Khamessan A, Vanstone CA. Vitamin D Status of Infants of Mothers with Gestational Diabetes: Status at Birth and a Randomized Controlled Trial of Vitamin D Supplementation across Infancy. J Nutr. 2022 Nov;152(11):2441-2450. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxac194. Epub 2022 Sep 23.

    PubMed 36774110
  • Razaghi M, Gharibeh N, Vanstone CA, Sotunde OF, Khamessan A, Wei SQ, McNally D, Rauch F, Jones G, Kimmins S, Weiler HA. Correction of neonatal vitamin D status using 1000 IU vitamin D/d increased lean body mass by 12 months of age compared with 400 IU/d: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Jun 7;115(6):1612-1625. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab431.

    PubMed 35441210
  • Weiler HA, Vanstone CA, Razaghi M, Gharibeh N, Patel S, Wei SQ, McNally D. Disparities in Vitamin D Status of Newborn Infants from a Diverse Sociodemographic Population in Montreal, Canada. J Nutr. 2022 Jan 11;152(1):255-268. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab344.

    PubMed 34612495

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing cholecalciferol and Reference 400 in people with Healthy and Vitamin D Deficiency, run by McGill University at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Covid19 pandemic prevented continuation of study visits). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Lean mass (time frame: Trial phase is 1-12 months with primary end-point of 12 months. The follow-on study is up to 3 years.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02563015, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jun 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT02563015 | AzTrials