AzTrials
AzTrials

Foot Ulcer, DiabeticPhase 3NCT02563522

Safety and Efficacy Study of Engensis (VM202) in the Treatment of Chronic Non-Healing Foot Ulcers

A Phase 3 study testing Engensis (VM202) in people with Foot Ulcer, Diabetic, run by Helixmith Co., Ltd. at 22 sites in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will assess the safety and efficacy of using gene therapy via intramuscular injections of the calf for patients with chronic non-healing foot ulcers. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Foot Ulcer, Diabetic
What is being tested?
Engensis (VM202)
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
44 participants
Where
22 sitesUnited States
Study dates
27 Jun 2017to 24 Sep 2019
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female, between 18 and 80 years of age
  • Documented history of symptomatic PAD, with one or more of the following criteria satisfied:
  • ABI >0.40 and ≤0.90 or >1.4 (i.e., mild to severe PAD without critical limb ischemia) in target limb
  • TBI ≤0.7 in the target limb
  • Toe pressure of <55 mmHg in the target limb
  • A history of lower extremity PAD with previous related intervention in a leg
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Documented history of Type I or II diabetes with current treatment control (HbA1c of ≤12.0% at Screening) and currently on oral medication, injectable medication, and/or insulin
  • No significant changes were anticipated in diabetes medication regimen
  • At Screening, the subject had one ulcer on the target foot that fulfilled all of the following criteria:
  • Present for ≥2 weeks and ≤1 year
  • Full-thickness and not involving bone, tendon, or capsule (probing to tendon or capsule)
  • No sign of infection or osteomyelitis
  • Ulcer must have been 0.5 cm2 to 15 cm2 as measured at the Screening visit prior to debridement If more than one ulcer was present on the foot, the largest ulcer that fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria was considered the target (index) ulcer for the study. Subjects underwent protocol-defined standardized wound care during Screening (for two weeks or longer). Subjects were considered screen failures and did not receive study injections on Day 0 (Baseline) if the target ulcer did not meet all entry criteria (see above) as well as being confirmed as nonhealing.
  • Capable of understanding and complying with the protocol and signed the informed consent document prior to being subjected to any study related procedures
  • If female of childbearing potential, negative urine pregnancy test at Screening and used an acceptable method of birth control during the study

Who cannot join

  • Required revascularization in the target leg within 3 months of randomization
  • In the Investigator's assessment, required an amputation in the target leg within 3 months of randomization
  • Subjects with target foot ulcer with an etiology of vasculitis, pyoderma gangrenosum, necrobiosis lipoidica, hydrostatic pressure/venous insufficiency, any neoplasms (basalioma, Kaposi's sarcoma, squamous cell carcinoma, etc.), or due to a burn
  • The study ulcer increased or decreased by 50% or more at Baseline from Screening (as assessed by comparison of post-debridement photos taken at Screening and Day 0)
  • Evidence of active infection (e.g., cellulitis, osteomyelitis) or deep ulceration exposing bone or tendon in the foot planned for treatment
  • Any gangrene
Show all 29Show fewer
  • Current fracture in the target foot
  • Target ulcer located on an active (hot) Charcot foot
  • Heart Failure with a New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification of III or IV
  • Body mass index (BMI) >45 kg/m2 at Screening
  • Stroke or myocardial infarction within the last 3 months
  • Unstable angina
  • Uncontrolled hypertension defined as sustained systolic blood pressure (SBP) >200 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >110 mmHg at Baseline/Screening evaluation
  • Ophthalmologic conditions pertinent to proliferative retinopathy or conditions that precluded standard ophthalmologic examination
  • Inflammatory disorder of the blood vessels (inflammatory angiopathy, such as Buerger's disease)
  • Subjects with advanced liver disease including decompensated cirrhosis, jaundice, ascites, or bleeding varices
  • Subjects currently receiving immunosuppressive medications chemotherapy, or radiation therapy
  • Positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV) at Screening
  • Active hepatitis B or C infection as determined by hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb), hepatitis B core antibody (immunoglobulin G [IgG] and immunoglobulin M [IgM]; HBcAb), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and hepatitis C antibodies (Anti-HCV) at Screening
  • Clinically significant specific laboratory values at Screening (e.g., hemoglobin <8.0 g/dL, white blood cell [WBC] <3,000/μL, platelet count <75,000/mm3, aspartate aminotransferase [AST] and/or alanine aminotransferase [ALT] >3 times the upper limit of normal, or any other clinically significant lab abnormality which in the opinion of the Investigator was exclusionary)
  • Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 mL/min/1.73 m2
  • Subjects with a recent history (<5 years) of or new Screening finding of malignant neoplasm except basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (if excised and no evidence of recurrence for at least 1 year); subjects with medical history and/or family history of colon cancer in any first degree relative were excluded unless they had undergone a colonoscopy in the last 12 months with negative findings
  • Subjects with any comorbid conditions likely to have interfered with assessment of safety or efficacy or with an estimated life expectancy of less than 1 year
  • Subjects who required >81 mg daily of acetylsalicylic acid. If >81 mg was taken at Screening, subjects could be enrolled if they were willing/able to switch to another medication for the duration of the study
  • Subjects who required regular (daily) COX-2 inhibitor drug(s) or steroids (except inhaled steroids or ocular steroids); subjects could be enrolled if they were willing/able to undergo medication washout prior to the first dosing and refrained from taking these drugs during the study
  • Major psychiatric disorder in the past 6 months
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse/dependence in the past 2 years
  • Used an investigational drug in the past 3 months; used an investigational biologic in the past 12 months; concurrent participation in an investigational protocol or using unapproved therapeutics
  • Was unable or unwilling to give informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

22 sites in 1 country.

22 sites in 1 country

United States22 sites
  • Central Research Associates, Inc.

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35205

  • Sacramento Foot and Ankle

    Carmichael, California, 95608

  • Bay Area Foot and Ankle

    Castro Valley, California, 94546

  • Northwestern University

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • MedResearch, Inc

    El Paso, Texas, 79932

  • Oregon Foot and Ankle Center

    Eugene, Oregon, 97401

  • Acclaim Bone & Joint Institute

    Fort Worth, Texas, 76107

  • Texas Heart Institute

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • NEA Baptist

    Jonesboro, Arkansas, 72401

  • Advanced Foot & Ankle Center

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119

  • VA Long Beach Healthcare System

    Long Beach, California, 90822

  • USC Keck School of Medicine

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • Foot and Ankle Clinic

    Los Angeles, California, 90057

  • Futuro Clinical Trials

    McAllen, Texas, 78501

  • LCC Medical Research Institute

    Miami, Florida, 33126

  • Miami Dade Medical Research Institute, LLC

    Miami, Florida, 33176

  • Arizona Research Center

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85053

  • Center for Clinical Research Inc.

    San Francisco, California, 94115

  • Saint Louis University

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Olive View-UCLA Education & Research Institute

    Sylmar, California, 91342

  • University of Arizona

    Tucson, Arizona, 85724

  • UMASS Memorial Med Center

    Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of VM202 to Treat Chronic Nonhealing Foot Ulcers in Diabetic Patients With Concomitant Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD)

This study will assess the safety and efficacy of using gene therapy via intramuscular injections of the calf for patients with chronic non-healing foot ulcers.

Read the detailed description

A phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, 7-month study designed to assess the safety and efficacy of intramuscular (IM) injections in the calf of Engensis (VM202) in patients with chronic nonhealing foot ulcers. Three hundred patients will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio of VM202 or placebo injections:

  • Active -Engensis (VM202) + standard of care - 200 patients
  • Control - Placebo (VM202 Vehicle) + standard of care - 100 patients
Being tested
Engensis (VM202), Placebo
Keywords
non healing ulcers, VM202, Diabetic ulcers, foot ulcers, Engensis
Medical subject headings
Diabetic Foot, Foot Ulcer

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Engensis (VM202)Genetic

    gene therapy

  • PlaceboDrug

    Also called VM202 vehicle

    Standard of care plus placebo

Study groups in NCT02563522
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ActiveActive comparatorEngensis (VM202) + standard of care
Receives: Genetic: Engensis (VM202)
ControlPlacebo comparatorPlacebo (VM202 Vehicle) + standard of care
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of Subjects With a Target Wound Closure by the 4-month Follow-up Visit

    Determine the proportion of subjects with a target Wound Closure from baseline to month 4 visit

    Measured: Days 0 to Month 4

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Sep 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start27 Jun 2017
  3. Primary completion24 Sep 2019
  4. Study completion24 Sep 2019

Why it stopped: Low enrollment

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Active: Engensis (VM202) + standard of care - 200 subjects Control: Placebo (VM202 vehicle) + standard of care - 100 subjects
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
44 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02563522
Sponsor's protocol ID
VMNHU-003
Status last verified
Aug 2025
First submitted
28 Sep 2015
Last updated
9 Oct 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Perin E, Loveland L, Caporusso J, Dove C, Motley T, Sigal F, Vartivarian M, Oliva F, Armstrong DG; VMNHU-003 study group. Gene therapy for diabetic foot ulcers: Interim analysis of a randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of VM202 (ENGENSIS), a plasmid DNA expressing two isoforms of human hepatocyte growth factor. Int Wound J. 2023 Nov;20(9):3531-3539. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14226. Epub 2023 May 25.

    PubMed 37230802

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Engensis (VM202) in people with Foot Ulcer, Diabetic, run by Helixmith Co., Ltd. at 22 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 29 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 22 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Feb 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of Subjects With a Target Wound Closure by the 4-month Follow-up Visit (time frame: Days 0 to Month 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02563522, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Oct 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in