AzTrials
AzTrials

Abdominal CancerPhase 4NCT02566096

Efficacy of Transverses Abdominis -Plane Block With Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine With Morphine Postoperatively

A Phase 4 study testing transversus abdominis-plane block with local anesthetic 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 10 mg morphine in people with Abdominal Cancer, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis-plane block with bupivicaine versus bupivacaine with morphine in patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Abdominal Cancer
What is being tested?
transversus abdominis-plane block with local anesthetic 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 10 mg morphine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
Sep 2015to Jul 2016
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • 60 ASA I-II cancer patients with age range (18-60) years,
  • weight (50- 85) kg

Who cannot join

  • with patients with known drug allergy to study drugs
  • with significant cardiac, respiratory, renal or hepatic disease
  • with coagulation disorders
  • those with psychiatric illnesses that would interfere with perception and assessment of pain.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • South Egypt Cancer Instuite

    Asyut, 171516

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Efficacy of Transverses Abdominis -Plane Block With Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine With Morphine in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Cancer Surgery

This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis-plane block with bupivicaine versus bupivacaine with morphine in patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery.

Read the detailed description

This randomized study will be approved by the local ethics committee of South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assuit University, Egypt after written informed consent. This study will include approximately 60 ASA I-II cancer patients with age range (18-60) years, weight (50- 85) kg who will be scheduled for lower abdominal cancer surgery (abdominal hysterectomy, oophorectomy and radical cystectomy). Exclude from the study Patients with known drug allergy to study drugs, significant cardiac, respiratory, renal or hepatic disease, coagulation disorders and those with psychiatric illnesses that would interfere with perception and assessment of pain. Preoperatively, patients will be taught how to evaluate their own pain intensity using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), scored from 0-10 (where 0= no pain and 10=worst pain imaginable).

Patients will be randomly assigned using an online research randomizer into two groups, 30 patients in each group:

Group 1:

30 patients receive ultrasound guided transversus abdominis-plane block with local anesthetic 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.5 % diluted in 20 ml saline (total volume 40 ml) in two divided doses i.e. 20 ml is administered on each side of the abdominal wall.

Group 2:

30 patients receive ultrasound guided transversus abdominis-plane block with local anesthetic 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 10 mg morphine diluted in 20 ml saline (total volume 40 ml) in two divided doses i.e. 20 ml is administered on each side of the abdominal wall.

Surgery will be performed under standard general anesthesia and ultrasound guided TAP block will be performed before induction of GA.

Being tested
transversus abdominis-plane block with local anesthetic 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 10 mg morphine
Keywords
major abdominal cancer

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • transversus abdominis-plane block with local anesthetic 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 10 mg morphineDrug

    compare the analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis-plane block with bupivicaine with morphine in patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery.

Study groups in NCT02566096
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TAP with bupivicainePlacebo comparator30 patients receive ultrasound guided transversus abdominis-plane block (TAP) with local anesthetic 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.5 % diluted in 20 ml saline (total volume 40 ml) in two divided doses i.e. 20 ml is administered on each side of the abdominal wall.
Receives: Drug: transversus abdominis-plane block with local anesthetic 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 10 mg morphine
TAP with bupivicaine with morphineActive comparator30 patients receive ultrasound guided transversus abdominis-plane block (TAP) with local anesthetic 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 10 mg morphine diluted in 20 ml saline (total volume 40 ml) in two divided doses i.e. 20 ml is administered on each side of the abdominal wall.
Receives: Drug: transversus abdominis-plane block with local anesthetic 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 10 mg morphine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The presence and severity of pain at rest and on coughing will be assessed using a Visual Analog Scale

    The presence and severity of pain at rest and on coughing will be assessed using a Visual Analog Scale will be assessed postoperatively at baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours.

    Measured: first 24 hours postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. the level of sedation by using sedation score

    the level of sedation by using sedation score (awake and alert = 0, quietly awake = 1, asleep but easily roused= 2, deep sleep = 3) will be assessed postoperatively at baseline, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours.

    Measured: 24 hours postoperatively

  2. first request for analgesia in minutes will be observed

    Measured: firsr 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Oct 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2015
  3. Primary completionJul 2016
  4. Study completionJul 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02566096
Sponsor's protocol ID
229
Status last verified
Mar 2016
First submitted
30 Sep 2015
Last updated
15 Jul 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • El Sherif FA, Mohamed SA, Kamal SM. The effect of morphine added to bupivacaine in ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for postoperative analgesia following lower abdominal cancer surgery, a randomized controlled study. J Clin Anesth. 2017 Jun;39:4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.03.009. Epub 2017 Mar 10.

    PubMed 28494906

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing transversus abdominis-plane block with local anesthetic 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 10 mg morphine in people with Abdominal Cancer, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The presence and severity of pain at rest and on coughing will be assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (time frame: first 24 hours postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02566096, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jul 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in