Bifidobacteria In Children With Abdominal Pain-Associated Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

The study was a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial conducted at two pediatric tertiary care centers in Naples and Foggia. All children aged 8-17 years referred for IBS or FD to the Pediatric Clinics of the two participating centers between January and December 2014 were eligible for the study. IBS and FD were diagnosed using the Rome III criteria for pediatric FGIDs. The main exclusion criterion was the presence of chronic organic gastrointestinal diseases, assessed by full clinical history and examination, and initial laboratory investigation including complete blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, serum amylase and lipase, tissue transglutaminase antibodies, total serum immunoglubulins A, and fecal calprotectin. Abnormalities in any of these tests resulted in the patient's exclusion from the study. Further exclusion criteria were previous abdominal surgery, diseases affecting bowel motility, or concomitant psychiatric, neurological, metabolic, renal, hepatic, infectious, hematological, cardiovascular or pulmonary disorders. Finally, patients who had been using any commercial preparation of probiotics during the previous 3 months were also excluded.

The study was articulated in 16 weeks. After recruitment, patients entered a 2 week-run-in phase during which evacuative frequency, stool features and gastrointestinal symptoms were recorded on a daily basis using a questionnaire/diary provided at the study entry by the physician. At the end of the baseline period, patients returned to the center where information regarding AP characteristics, bowel habits and associated symptoms were recorded using a previously validated interviewer-administered questionnaire for pediatric FGIDs. The "Functional Disability Inventory" (FDI), a second interviewer-administered validated questionnaire was used to assess physical and psychosocial functions and investigate patients' QoL. The instrument consists of 15 items concerning perceptions of activity limitations during the past 2 weeks; total scores are computed by summing the ratings for each item. Total available score ranges from 0 to 60 and higher scores indicate greater disability. After completing these questionnaires, patients were assigned in a double-blinded fashion to the placebo or intervention group according to a computer-generated randomization allocation table. Participants were randomized to receive either 1 sachet per day of a mixture of three Bifidobacteria (namely, 3 billions of Bifidobacterium longum BB536®, 1 billion of Bifidobacterium infantis M-63®, and 1 billion of Bifidobacterium breve M-16V®), or an identical looking and tasting placebo for six weeks. No further medication other than analgesics was allowed for the whole duration of the study.

After completing the six weeks of treatment, no preparation was administered for a 2-week-''washout'' period. Afterwards, each patient was switched to the other group and treated with placebo or probiotics for a period of six further weeks.

At each follow-up visit subjects underwent a complete physical examination, data recorded on the daily diaries were collected and compliance to treatment was verified. Furthermore, the FGIDs symptoms questionnaire and the FDI were administered by the physician and answers were recorded.

The main outcome parameters considered for the assessment of the efficacy of the administered treatment were abdominal pain and QoL. The investigators considered a decrease in FDI score of at least 75% of the baseline score to define a relevant improvement in QoL. Secondary outcome parameters were changes in bowel habit for IBS patients, and the effect of the tested treatment on nausea for FD subjects.

The investigators involved in the recruitment and follow-up of patients, those coordinating the study and analyzing the data, patients themselves and their caregivers were all unaware of the randomization group at each phase of the study.

The institutional ethical review boards of both participating centers approved the study protocol. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians before enrollment.