PolyneuropathyNCT02566941
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in the Critically Ill
A study testing Gymna Belgium, DUO 400 (Neuromuscular electrical stimulation) in people with Polyneuropathy, run by Brugmann University Hospital at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
Neuromuscular stimulation (NMES) has been used for several years in the rehabilitation of COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) patients (among others) to improve their resistance to efforts in everyday life. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Polyneuropathy
- What is being tested?
- Gymna Belgium, DUO 400 (Neuromuscular electrical stimulation)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2015to 30 May 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Admission in the ICU of the Brugmann Hospital (Unit 1020) with an intended ICU stay superior to 3 days
- Aged over 18 years
- Respiratory assistance needed (invasive and non-invasive ventilation, CPAP or Optiflow and PaO2(arterial oxygen pressure)/FiO2(fraction of inhaled oxygen)<200mmHg)
- SAPSII (Simplified Acute Physiology Score) between entre 35 et 70.
Who cannot join
- Definitive exclusion criteria:
- patients bearing a pacemaker or an AICD (automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator )
- BMI superior to 35
- serious neuromuscular pathologies or alterations in the inferior members that make both tights stimulation impossible
- pregnant women
- patients admitted from Friday evening to Sunday morning
Show all 12Show fewer
- Temporary exclusion criteria:
- Hemodynamic instability (even with filling up and amines: noradrenaline > 0.5y/kg/min and/or dobutamine >5y/kg/min and/or adrenaline ivc)
- Extreme severity with suspicion of death within the first 24 h
- PIC > 20 cmH2O
- Severe agitation (RASS > +1)
- Curare utilisation within the last 24h
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Neuromuscular stimulation (NMES) has been used for several years in the rehabilitation of COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) patients (among others) to improve their resistance to efforts in everyday life. In patients in intensive care, it seems to improve strength, reduce the loss of muscle mass, prevent the development of CIP / CIM (Critical illness polyneuropathy / critical illness myopathy) and perhaps even reduce ventilation days, with expected effects on the duration of hospitalization and the long-term functional outcome. Although its use could sometimes be limited by the development of peripheral edema and use of vasoconstrictors, the main advantage of this technique is the possibility of being used very early, even in patients that require deep sedation . This is extremely important given that the muscular atrophy process already starts 18h after the onset of invasive ventilation and as signs of impaired nerve transmission are developed in one third of patients at risk within 72 hours.
The purpose of the study is to assess the effects, in the short and medium term, of early neuromuscular stimulation in patients who are at higher risk of developing a critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP) / critical illness myopathy (CIM) spectrum disease.
This is a randomized controlled single-blind study comparing a group of patients submitted to NMES early (up to 5 days after admission) versus a control group unstimulated.
- Conditions
- Polyneuropathy
- Being tested
- Gymna Belgium, DUO 400 (Neuromuscular electrical stimulation)
- Keywords
- critical illness polyneuropathy, critical illness myopathy, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, intensive care unit acquired weakness, prevention of critical illness polyneuropathy
- Medical subject headings
- Polyneuropathies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Gymna Belgium, DUO 400 (Neuromuscular electrical stimulation)Device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Stimulated | Experimental | Patients included in the 'stimulated' group will be stimulated at the level of the quadriceps twice a day, bilaterally and simultaneously, five days per week from Monday to Friday (Stimulator: Gymna Belgium, DUO 400). The stimulation protocol (rectified alternating current; frequency, 75 Hz; intensity, 0-80 mA; pulse duration, 350 microseconds) is the one proposed by the manufacturer for atrophy prevention. The intensity of the electrical current will be gradually increased, without exceeding 80mA or the pain threshold of the patient. Receives: Device: Gymna Belgium, DUO 400 (Neuromuscular electrical stimulation) |
| Control | No intervention | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Duration of respiratory support
The duration of ventilatory support is defined as the time in days, during which the patient requires invasive media type (continuous or not, intubation or tracheotomy and need the help of the respirator) or noninvasive (discontinuous or CPAP NIV (continuous positive airway pressure, noninvasive ventilation)- dependence). This will be assessed during the entire length of stay of the patient inside the intensive care unit (ICU).
Measured: Patients will be followed for the duration of their intensive care unit stay.The average duration of an intensive care unit stay in the CHU Brugamnn Hospital in 2014, all pathologies mixed, is 6 days.
Length of stay in the intensive care unit
Measured in days
Measured: Patients will be followed for the duration of their intensive care unit stay.The average duration of an intensive care unit stay in the CHU Brugamnn Hospital in 2014, all pathologies mixed, is 6 days.
Type of hospital discharge
Back to home or to a specialized long term care structure
Measured: At hospital discharge, within a maximum of two years (approximate study length).
Secondary outcomes (20)
cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris
The quadriceps muscle mass will be assessed using an ultrasound system (PHILIPS, VIVIDS5).
Measured: First day in ICU
cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris
The quadriceps muscle mass will be assessed using an ultrasound system (PHILIPS, VIVIDS5).
Measured: Third day in ICU
cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris
The quadriceps muscle mass will be assessed using an ultrasound system (PHILIPS, VIVIDS5).
Measured: Fifth day in ICU
cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris
The quadriceps muscle mass will be assessed using an ultrasound system (PHILIPS, VIVIDS5).
Measured: Seventh day in ICU
cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris
The quadriceps muscle mass will be assessed using an ultrasound system (PHILIPS, VIVIDS5).
Measured: The day the patient is discharged from the intensive care unit. The average duration of an intensive care unit stay in the CHU Brugamnn Hospital in 2014, all pathologies mixed, is 6 days.
Force index - Grip test
The "Grip Test" involves measuring the grip force developed by the hand of the patient, using a dynamometer (Neugen Medicals MODEL EH 101). This test will be conducted as soon as possible aka when the patient has -1 ≤ RASS ≤ 1, is sufficiently collaborating and little sedated.
Measured: Patients will be followed for the duration of their intensive care unit stay.The average duration of an intensive care unit stay in the CHU Brugamnn Hospital in 2014, all pathologies mixed, is 6 days.
Force index - Grip test
The "Grip Test" involves measuring the grip force developed by the hand of the patient, using a dynamometer (Neugen Medicals MODEL EH 101). This test will be performed on the day the patient is discharged from the intensive care unit.
Measured: The day the patient is discharged from the intensive care unit. The average duration of an intensive care unit stay in the CHU Brugamnn Hospital in 2014, all pathologies mixed, is 6 days.
Force index - Bike
The bike (Neugen Medicals MODEL EH 101) is a true "bike room" which facilitates active and passive mobilization of bedridden patients and allows, among other things, to measure the force developed by the patients and the ratio between active and passive labor work.This test will be conducted as soon as possible aka when the patient has -1 ≤ RASS ≤ 1, is sufficiently collaborating and little sedated.
Measured: Patients will be followed for the duration of their intensive care unit stay.The average duration of an intensive care unit stay in the CHU Brugamnn Hospital in 2014, all pathologies mixed, is 6 days.
Force index - Bike
The bike (Neugen Medicals MODEL EH 101) is a true "bike room" which facilitates active and passive mobilization of bedridden patients and allows, among other things, to measure the force developed by the patients and the ratio between active and passive labor work.This will be measured at patient discharge from ICU
Measured: The day the patient is discharged from the intensive care unit. The average duration of an intensive care unit stay in the CHU Brugamnn Hospital in 2014, all pathologies mixed, is 6 days.
Electromyogram
The Electrical conduction of nerves fibula will be assessed to detect nerve damage. A positive test will involve a complete electrophysiological monitoring by a specialist.
Measured: First day of ICU admission
Electromyogram
The Electrical conduction of nerves fibula will be assessed to detect nerve damage. A positive test will involve a complete electrophysiological monitoring by a specialist.
Measured: Third day of ICU admission
Electromyogram
The Electrical conduction of nerves fibula will be assessed to detect nerve damage. A positive test will involve a complete electrophysiological monitoring by a specialist.
Measured: Fifth day of ICU admission
Electromyogram
The Electrical conduction of nerves fibula will be assessed to detect nerve damage. A positive test will involve a complete electrophysiological monitoring by a specialist.
Measured: Seventh day of ICU admission
Electromyogram
The Electrical conduction of nerves fibula will be assessed to detect nerve damage. A positive test will involve a complete electrophysiological monitoring by a specialist.
Measured: The day the patient is discharged from the intensive care unit. The average duration of an intensive care unit stay in the CHU Brugamnn Hospital in 2014, all pathologies mixed, is 6 days.
Physical Function ICU Test score (PFIT-s)
This simple functional test was developed to measure the functional abilities of patients severely debilitated that are found in the ICU. It consists in assessing four different levels of physical ability: the bending force of the shoulder and knee extension in sitting position, measured with the Oxford scale; the level of assistance needed to move from a sitting position to a standing position; and the ability to stand and walk on site. Patients will be tested as soon as possible aka when the patient has: -1 ≤ RASS ≤ 1, is sufficiently collaborating and not heavily sedated.
Measured: Patients will be followed for the duration of their intensive care unit stay.The average duration of an intensive care unit stay in the CHU Brugamnn Hospital in 2014, all pathologies mixed, is 6 days.
Physical Function ICU Test score (PFIT-s)
This simple functional test was developed to measure the functional abilities of patients severely debilitated that are found in the ICU. It consists in assessing four different levels of physical ability: the bending force of the shoulder and knee extension in sitting position, measured with the Oxford scale; the level of assistance needed to move from a sitting position to a standing position; and the ability to stand and walk on site.
Measured: the day the patient is discharged from the intensive care unit. The average duration of an intensive care unit stay in the CHU Brugamnn Hospital in 2014, all pathologies mixed, is 6 days.
Six minutes Walking Test
The 6-minute walk test is a validated and commonly used test to assess submaximal functional capacity; the test is conducted according to the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society.
Measured: the day the patient is discharged from the hospital, within a maximum of 2 years (approximate total study length)
Six minutes Walking Test
The 6-minute walk test is a validated and commonly used test to assess submaximal functional capacity; the test is conducted according to the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society.
Measured: one year after the day of admission to the intensive care unit
MOS SF-36
The MOS SF-36 questionnaire will be proposed to patients on the day of hospital discharge and one year after the day of admission to the ICU, to assess their quality of life.
Measured: the day the patient is discharged from the hospital, within a maximum of two years (approximated study lenght)
MOS SF-36
The MOS SF-36 questionnaire will be proposed to patients on the day of hospital discharge and one year after the day of admission to the ICU, to assess their quality of life.
Measured: one year after the day of admission to the intensive care unit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Study start1 Oct 2015
- Primary completion30 May 2018
- Study completion30 May 2018
Why it stopped: Lack of human ressources
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PolyneuropathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Brugmann University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jacques DEVRIENDT, Brugmann University Hospital
- Investigators
- Jacques Devriendt, MD, Principal investigator, CHU Brugmann
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02566941
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHUB-SNM001
- Status last verified
- May 2018
- First submitted
- 14 Aug 2015
- Last updated
- 31 May 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Dal-Pizzol F, Ritter C. Functional disability 5 years after ARDS. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 21;365(3):274-5; author reply 275-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1105509. No abstract available.
PubMed 21774725Batt J, dos Santos CC, Cameron JI, Herridge MS. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness: clinical phenotypes and molecular mechanisms. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb 1;187(3):238-46. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201205-0954SO. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
PubMed 23204256Hermans G, De Jonghe B, Bruyninckx F, Van den Berghe G. Interventions for preventing critical illness polyneuropathy and critical illness myopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 30;2014(1):CD006832. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006832.pub3.
PubMed 24477672Maddocks M, Gao W, Higginson IJ, Wilcock A. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for muscle weakness in adults with advanced disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;(1):CD009419. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009419.pub2.
PubMed 23440837Dirks ML, Wall BT, Snijders T, Ottenbros CL, Verdijk LB, van Loon LJ. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation prevents muscle disuse atrophy during leg immobilization in humans. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2014 Mar;210(3):628-41. doi: 10.1111/apha.12200. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
PubMed 24251881Routsi C, Gerovasili V, Vasileiadis I, Karatzanos E, Pitsolis T, Tripodaki E, Markaki V, Zervakis D, Nanas S. Electrical muscle stimulation prevents critical illness polyneuromyopathy: a randomized parallel intervention trial. Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R74. doi: 10.1186/cc8987. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
PubMed 20426834Burke D, Gorman E, Stokes D, Lennon O. An evaluation of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in critical care using the ICF framework: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Respir J. 2016 Jul;10(4):407-20. doi: 10.1111/crj.12234. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
PubMed 25353646Hirose T, Shiozaki T, Shimizu K, Mouri T, Noguchi K, Ohnishi M, Shimazu T. The effect of electrical muscle stimulation on the prevention of disuse muscle atrophy in patients with consciousness disturbance in the intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2013 Aug;28(4):536.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.02.010. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
PubMed 23561945Segers J, Hermans G, Bruyninckx F, Meyfroidt G, Langer D, Gosselink R. Feasibility of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 2014 Dec;29(6):1082-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.06.024. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
PubMed 25108833Levine S, Nguyen T, Taylor N, Friscia ME, Budak MT, Rothenberg P, Zhu J, Sachdeva R, Sonnad S, Kaiser LR, Rubinstein NA, Powers SK, Shrager JB. Rapid disuse atrophy of diaphragm fibers in mechanically ventilated humans. N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 27;358(13):1327-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070447.
PubMed 18367735Latronico N, Bertolini G, Guarneri B, Botteri M, Peli E, Andreoletti S, Bera P, Luciani D, Nardella A, Vittorielli E, Simini B, Candiani A. Simplified electrophysiological evaluation of peripheral nerves in critically ill patients: the Italian multi-centre CRIMYNE study. Crit Care. 2007;11(1):R11. doi: 10.1186/cc5671.
PubMed 17254336Seymour JM, Ward K, Sidhu PS, Puthucheary Z, Steier J, Jolley CJ, Rafferty G, Polkey MI, Moxham J. Ultrasound measurement of rectus femoris cross-sectional area and the relationship with quadriceps strength in COPD. Thorax. 2009 May;64(5):418-23. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.103986. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
PubMed 19158125Latronico N, Nattino G, Guarneri B, Fagoni N, Amantini A, Bertolini G; GiVITI Study Investigators. Validation of the peroneal nerve test to diagnose critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy in the intensive care unit: the multicentre Italian CRIMYNE-2 diagnostic accuracy study. F1000Res. 2014 Jun 11;3:127. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.3933.3. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25309729Skinner EH, Berney S, Warrillow S, Denehy L. Development of a physical function outcome measure (PFIT) and a pilot exercise training protocol for use in intensive care. Crit Care Resusc. 2009 Jun;11(2):110-5.
PubMed 19485874Denehy L, de Morton NA, Skinner EH, Edbrooke L, Haines K, Warrillow S, Berney S. A physical function test for use in the intensive care unit: validity, responsiveness, and predictive utility of the physical function ICU test (scored). Phys Ther. 2013 Dec;93(12):1636-45. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120310. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
PubMed 23886842
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 May 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in the Critically Ill
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02566941
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CHUB-SNM001
- Conditions
- Polyneuropathy
- Keywords
- critical illness polyneuropathy, critical illness myopathy, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, intensive care unit acquired weakness, prevention of critical illness polyneuropathy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Lack of human ressources
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Brugmann University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 May 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Neuromuscular stimulation (NMES) has been used for several years in the rehabilitation of COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) patients (among others) to improve their resistance to efforts in everyday life. In patients in intensive care, it seems to improve strength, reduce the loss of muscle mass, prevent the development of CIP / CIM (Critical illness polyneuropathy / critical illness myopathy) and perhaps even reduce ventilation days, with expected effects on the duration of hospitalization and the long-term functional outcome. Although its use could sometimes be limited by the development of peripheral edema and use of vasoconstrictors, the main advantage of this technique is the possibility of being used very early, even in patients that require deep sedation . This is extremely important given that the muscular atrophy process already starts 18h after the onset of invasive ventilation and as signs of impaired nerve transmission are developed in one third of patients at risk within 72 hours.
The purpose of the study is to assess the effects, in the short and medium term, of early neuromuscular stimulation in patients who are at higher risk of developing a critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP) / critical illness myopathy (CIM) spectrum disease.
This is a randomized controlled single-blind study comparing a group of patients submitted to NMES early (up to 5 days after admission) versus a control group unstimulated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Stimulated | Experimental | Device: Gymna Belgium, DUO 400 (Neuromuscular electrical stimulation)Patients included in the 'stimulated' group will be stimulated at the level of the quadriceps twice a day, bilaterally and simultaneously, five days per week from Monday to Friday (Stimulator: Gymna Belgium, DUO 400). The stimulation protocol (rectified alternating current; frequency, 75 Hz; intensity, 0-80 mA; pulse duration, 350 microseconds) is the one proposed by the manufacturer for atrophy prevention. The intensity of the electrical current will be gradually increased, without exceeding 80mA or the pain threshold of the patient. |
| Control | No intervention | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Admission in the ICU of the Brugmann Hospital (Unit 1020) with an intended ICU stay superior to 3 days
- Aged over 18 years
- Respiratory assistance needed (invasive and non-invasive ventilation, CPAP or Optiflow and PaO2(arterial oxygen pressure)/FiO2(fraction of inhaled oxygen)<200mmHg)
- SAPSII (Simplified Acute Physiology Score) between entre 35 et 70.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- patients bearing a pacemaker or an AICD (automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator )
- BMI superior to 35
- serious neuromuscular pathologies or alterations in the inferior members that make both tights stimulation impossible
- pregnant women
- patients admitted from Friday evening to Sunday morning
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Gymna Belgium, DUO 400 (Neuromuscular electrical stimulation) | Device | Stimulated |
Primary outcome
Duration of respiratory support
Time frame: Patients will be followed for the duration of their intensive care unit stay.The average duration of an intensive care unit stay in the CHU Brugamnn Hospital in 2014, all pathologies mixed, is 6 days.
The duration of ventilatory support is defined as the time in days, during which the patient requires invasive media type (continuous or not, intubation or tracheotomy and need the help of the respirator) or noninvasive (discontinuous or CPAP NIV (continuous positive airway pressure, noninvasive ventilation)- dependence). This will be assessed during the entire length of stay of the patient inside the intensive care unit (ICU).
Length of stay in the intensive care unit
Time frame: Patients will be followed for the duration of their intensive care unit stay.The average duration of an intensive care unit stay in the CHU Brugamnn Hospital in 2014, all pathologies mixed, is 6 days.
Measured in days
Type of hospital discharge
Time frame: At hospital discharge, within a maximum of two years (approximate study length).
Back to home or to a specialized long term care structure
20 secondary outcomes
cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris
Time frame: First day in ICU
cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris
Time frame: Third day in ICU
cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris
Time frame: Fifth day in ICU
cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris
Time frame: Seventh day in ICU
cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris
Time frame: The day the patient is discharged from the intensive care unit. The average duration of an intensive care unit stay in the CHU Brugamnn Hospital in 2014, all pathologies mixed, is 6 days.
Force index - Grip test
Time frame: Patients will be followed for the duration of their intensive care unit stay.The average duration of an intensive care unit stay in the CHU Brugamnn Hospital in 2014, all pathologies mixed, is 6 days.
Force index - Grip test
Time frame: The day the patient is discharged from the intensive care unit. The average duration of an intensive care unit stay in the CHU Brugamnn Hospital in 2014, all pathologies mixed, is 6 days.
Force index - Bike
Time frame: Patients will be followed for the duration of their intensive care unit stay.The average duration of an intensive care unit stay in the CHU Brugamnn Hospital in 2014, all pathologies mixed, is 6 days.
Force index - Bike
Time frame: The day the patient is discharged from the intensive care unit. The average duration of an intensive care unit stay in the CHU Brugamnn Hospital in 2014, all pathologies mixed, is 6 days.
Electromyogram
Time frame: First day of ICU admission
Electromyogram
Time frame: Third day of ICU admission
Electromyogram
Time frame: Fifth day of ICU admission
Electromyogram
Time frame: Seventh day of ICU admission
Electromyogram
Time frame: The day the patient is discharged from the intensive care unit. The average duration of an intensive care unit stay in the CHU Brugamnn Hospital in 2014, all pathologies mixed, is 6 days.
Physical Function ICU Test score (PFIT-s)
Time frame: Patients will be followed for the duration of their intensive care unit stay.The average duration of an intensive care unit stay in the CHU Brugamnn Hospital in 2014, all pathologies mixed, is 6 days.
Physical Function ICU Test score (PFIT-s)
Time frame: the day the patient is discharged from the intensive care unit. The average duration of an intensive care unit stay in the CHU Brugamnn Hospital in 2014, all pathologies mixed, is 6 days.
Six minutes Walking Test
Time frame: the day the patient is discharged from the hospital, within a maximum of 2 years (approximate total study length)
Six minutes Walking Test
Time frame: one year after the day of admission to the intensive care unit
MOS SF-36
Time frame: the day the patient is discharged from the hospital, within a maximum of two years (approximated study lenght)
MOS SF-36
Time frame: one year after the day of admission to the intensive care unit
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 May 2018.
- Background: PubMed 21774725Dal-Pizzol F, Ritter C. Functional disability 5 years after ARDS. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 21;365(3):274-5; author reply 275-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1105509. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 23204256Batt J, dos Santos CC, Cameron JI, Herridge MS. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness: clinical phenotypes and molecular mechanisms. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb 1;187(3):238-46. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201205-0954SO. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
- Background: PubMed 24477672Hermans G, De Jonghe B, Bruyninckx F, Van den Berghe G. Interventions for preventing critical illness polyneuropathy and critical illness myopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 30;2014(1):CD006832. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006832.pub3.
- Background: PubMed 23440837Maddocks M, Gao W, Higginson IJ, Wilcock A. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for muscle weakness in adults with advanced disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;(1):CD009419. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009419.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 24251881Dirks ML, Wall BT, Snijders T, Ottenbros CL, Verdijk LB, van Loon LJ. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation prevents muscle disuse atrophy during leg immobilization in humans. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2014 Mar;210(3):628-41. doi: 10.1111/apha.12200. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
- Background: PubMed 20426834Routsi C, Gerovasili V, Vasileiadis I, Karatzanos E, Pitsolis T, Tripodaki E, Markaki V, Zervakis D, Nanas S. Electrical muscle stimulation prevents critical illness polyneuromyopathy: a randomized parallel intervention trial. Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R74. doi: 10.1186/cc8987. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
- Background: PubMed 25353646Burke D, Gorman E, Stokes D, Lennon O. An evaluation of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in critical care using the ICF framework: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Respir J. 2016 Jul;10(4):407-20. doi: 10.1111/crj.12234. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
- Background: PubMed 23561945Hirose T, Shiozaki T, Shimizu K, Mouri T, Noguchi K, Ohnishi M, Shimazu T. The effect of electrical muscle stimulation on the prevention of disuse muscle atrophy in patients with consciousness disturbance in the intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2013 Aug;28(4):536.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.02.010. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
- Background: PubMed 25108833Segers J, Hermans G, Bruyninckx F, Meyfroidt G, Langer D, Gosselink R. Feasibility of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 2014 Dec;29(6):1082-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.06.024. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
- Background: PubMed 18367735Levine S, Nguyen T, Taylor N, Friscia ME, Budak MT, Rothenberg P, Zhu J, Sachdeva R, Sonnad S, Kaiser LR, Rubinstein NA, Powers SK, Shrager JB. Rapid disuse atrophy of diaphragm fibers in mechanically ventilated humans. N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 27;358(13):1327-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070447.
- Background: PubMed 17254336Latronico N, Bertolini G, Guarneri B, Botteri M, Peli E, Andreoletti S, Bera P, Luciani D, Nardella A, Vittorielli E, Simini B, Candiani A. Simplified electrophysiological evaluation of peripheral nerves in critically ill patients: the Italian multi-centre CRIMYNE study. Crit Care. 2007;11(1):R11. doi: 10.1186/cc5671.
- Background: PubMed 19158125Seymour JM, Ward K, Sidhu PS, Puthucheary Z, Steier J, Jolley CJ, Rafferty G, Polkey MI, Moxham J. Ultrasound measurement of rectus femoris cross-sectional area and the relationship with quadriceps strength in COPD. Thorax. 2009 May;64(5):418-23. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.103986. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
Related trials for Polyneuropathy
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History Evaluation of Charcot Marie Tooth Disease (CMT) Types CMT1B, CMT2A, CMT4A, CMT4C, and Others
Charcot Marie Tooth Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
An Open Label Clinical Study to Evaluate Tanruprubart (Also Commonly Known as ANX005) in Participants With Guillain-Barré Syndrome (FORWARD Study)
Guillain-Barre Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Muscle MRI Fat Fraction Before Surgery to Predict Strength Recovery After Foot-Drop Surgery in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease
Foot Drop, Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 1A
RecruitingObservational study
Real-World Efgartigimod Effectiveness in CIDP: A Prospective Study
Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy, CIDP
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Registry Database for Movement Disorders in Southern Anhui Province
Motor Neuron Diseases, Spinocerebellar Ataxias
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jacques Devriendt, MD principal investigator
CHU Brugmann
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Gymna Belgium, DUO 400 (Neuromuscular electrical stimulation) in people with Polyneuropathy, run by Brugmann University Hospital at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Duration of respiratory support (time frame: Patients will be followed for the duration of their intensive care unit stay.The average duration of an intensive care unit stay in the CHU Brugamnn Hospital in 2014, all pathologies mixed, is 6 days.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02566941, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2018.