AzTrials
AzTrials

DyspepsiaNCT02570776

UBT as a Diagnostic Tool for HP Prevalance

An observational study of Dyspepsia, run by National Institute of Liver & GI Diseases, Pakistan at 1 site in Pakistan.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The prevalence of H. pylori infection in Pakistan is unknown and investigators want to assess it in dyspeptic patients utilizing UBT. At the same time investigators want to validate UBT sensitivity and specificity in Pakistani patients Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Dyspepsia
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
Dec 2013to Feb 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients getting routine upper GI Endoscopy are enrolled and as per routine histopathology samples are taken to assess Helicobacter pylori. This assessment will be done by two independent histopathologists \& later the results will be compared with C14 UBT taking histopathology as gold standard.

Who may be able to join

  • Male and female subjects with dyspeptic symptoms (B1 Criteria of FD)
  • Subject who has not been treated for H pylori eradication in the past
  • Age above 18 years
  • No Alarm symptoms of :
  • Gastrointestinal Bleeding
  • Anemia
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Early satiety
  • Unexplained weight loss
  • Progressive dysphagia
  • Odynophagia
  • Recurrent vomiting
  • Family history of GI malignancy
  • Previous GI malignancy

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant females
  • Use of NSAIDs
  • Use of anti- secretory agent (H2 blockers) and proton pump inhibitors in previous 4 weeks
  • Use of anti- microbial agents (Clarithromycin, Metronidazole, Amoxacillin, quinalones) or bismuth in last 4 weeks
  • .Gastric and/or duodenal erosions or ulcers, polyps or malignancy if noted on endoscopy will be excluded.
  • Patients with predominant symptoms or gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD) or Endoscopic evidence of esophagitis.
  • Patients with abnormal upper abdominal ultrasound.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site, 1 recruiting
  • National Institute of Liver & GI Diseases, Dow University of Health Sciences

    Karachi, Sindh, 0042

    Zahid Azam, FCPS, MSc, +922199261462, zahid.azam@duhs.edu.pk

    Abdullah Khalid, MBBS; FCPS, +922199261462, abdullah.khalid@duhs.edu.pk

    Recruiting

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Prevalence of Helicobacter Pylori Infection in Dyspeptic Adults and Validation of C14 Urea Breath Test (UBT) as a Diagnostic Tool for Helicobacter Pylori Infection in Pakistani Population

The prevalence of H. pylori infection in Pakistan is unknown and investigators want to assess it in dyspeptic patients utilizing UBT. At the same time investigators want to validate UBT sensitivity and specificity in Pakistani patients

Read the detailed description

The non-invasive methods for the diagnosis of Hp are the Urea Breath Test (UBT) and serological tests. The serological tests includes ELISA test in serum for Hp antibody and in stool for Hp antigen. Serum ELISA Hp antibody is not sensitive for showing active infection and the titres do not decrease even after successful eradication. Serology test cannot be used for those who have previously been treated for Hp, as the decline in titre of Hp antibodies is too slow to be of practical use. The stool Hp antigen detection test is more sensitive and specific as it detects bacterial antigens which will only be positive in the presence of Hp. However, it is cumbersome to collect stool and laboratory services are required. The C14 Urea Breath Test (UBT) is an office based test with sensitivity and specificity comparable to that of the stool antigen test. The diagnostic validity of these tests depends on the prevalence of H pylori infection. A higher prevalence would be associated with higher sensitivity and lower specificity. The safety profile of the urea breath test is very favourable, and no major side effects are associated with it. The aims of this study are to estimate H pylori prevalence in Pakistan among the adult dyspeptic population and to validate the sensitivity and specificity UBT in our population

Conditions
Dyspepsia
Keywords
Helicobacter pylori, UBT, Sensitivity, specificity, prevalence
Medical subject headings
Dyspepsia, Hypersensitivity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02570776
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
observationCohort of patients for Endoscopy \& they are assessed for Helicobacter pylori through the histopathology \& also throgh C14 C UBT.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Prevalence of H pylori infection in Pakistani polulation

    Prevalence of H pylori will be assessed by UBT \& confirmed with histopathology as gold standard \& sensitivity \& specificity will be calculated.

    Measured: 1 day

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Sensivity & specificity of Heliprobe (C14 UBT system) in local population

    Sensitivity \& specificity will be measured by number of subjects positive based on ROC

    Measured: 1 day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Oct 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2013
  3. Primary completionDec 2015 (estimated)
  4. Study completionFeb 2016 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02570776
Sponsor's protocol ID
PK-13-01
Status last verified
Oct 2015
First submitted
7 May 2014
Last updated
7 Oct 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Dyspepsia, run by National Institute of Liver & GI Diseases, Pakistan at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Prevalence of H pylori infection in Pakistani polulation (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2015.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in