PROSTATE CANCERPROSINTNCT02570919
Phase II Study of Ultra-high-dose Hypofractionated vs. Single-dose Image-Guided Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
A study testing IGRT 45 Gy in 5 fractions of 9 Gy and IGRT 24 Gy single dose in people with PROSTATE CANCER, run by Fundacao Champalimaud at 1 site in Portugal.
Trial summary
The present study evaluates clinical outcomes and treatment-related toxicity following definitive ultra-high dose external beam radiotherapy delivered with two different regimens in patients with intermediate-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- PROSTATE CANCER
- What is being tested?
- IGRT 45 Gy in 5 fractions of 9 Gy and IGRT 24 Gy single dose
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePortugal
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2015to 31 Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Signed study specific informed consent form;
- Histologic confirmation of adenocarcinoma of the prostate by biopsy;
- PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL;
- Gleason score 7;
- Staging MRI must confirm American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage T1, T2a, T2b or T2c;
- No direct evidence of regional or distant metastases after appropriate staging studies;
Show all 10Show fewer
- Age ≥ 50;
- Performance Status 0-2;
- Internation Prostate Symptom Score score must be ≤ 15 (alpha blockers allowed);
- CT scan or Ultrasound-based volume estimation of prostate gland ≤ 100 grams;
Who cannot join
- Positive lymph-nodes or metastatic disease from prostate cancer on imaging studies
- Prior invasive malignancy unless disease-free for a minimum of 5 years
- Tumour Clinical stage T3 or T4 on MRI
- PSA > 20 ng/mL
- Gleason score > 7
- Previous pelvic radiotherapy
Show all 13Show fewer
- Previous surgery for prostate cancer
- Previous transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)
- History of Crohn's Disease or Ulcerative Colitis
- Previous significant urinary obstructive symptoms
- Significant psychiatric illness
- Ultrasound or CT estimate of prostate volume > 100 grams
- Severe, active co-morbidity
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Phase II Randomized Study Comparing Ultra-high-dose Hypofractionated vs. Single-dose Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) With Urethral Sparing for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
The present study evaluates clinical outcomes and treatment-related toxicity following definitive ultra-high dose external beam radiotherapy delivered with two different regimens in patients with intermediate-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Modern computer-driven technology enables the implementation of ultra-high hypofractionated Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) safely.
Prostate cancer patients classified according to the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines as intermediate risk (biopsy Gleason score of 7 and/or Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) level >10 and ≤20 ng/mL and/or Stage T1, T2a, T2b or T2c) are eligible for this study.
Read more
Patients will undergo IGRT with volumetric intensity-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) with state-of-the-art treatment-planning and quality assurance procedures. Emphasis is placed on normal tissue sparing and delivery accuracy via the use of devices that ensure stability and beam location reproducibility. A rectal balloon with air filling will be used for prostate target immobilization and anatomical reproducibility, while a urethral catheter loaded with beacon transponders will be used to ensure set-up reproducibility and online target tracking. Previously untreated patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer will be prospectively randomized to receive either 45 Gy in five fractions of 9 Gy each vs. 24 Gy in a single-dose.
Patients will be followed at one month post-treatment and every 3 months for up to 12 months (+/- 4 weeks) and every 6 months thereafter. Acute and chronic toxicity evaluations will focus on urinary, rectal and sexual functions and will be assessed through validated questionnaires. Serum PSA values will be regularly acquired during follow-up. A multiparametric MRI will be performed at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months following intervention. Additionally, a post-treatment diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) will be performed within 15 minutes of the first treatment, to measure early physiologic changes, such as perfusion and ischemia, that may correlate with clinically relevant end-points. Post-treatment prostate needle biopsies will be obtained at 24 months to evaluate pathologic response to therapy. The study will be continuously monitored for a minimum of 5 years. In the event unexpected severe (grade ≥3) toxicities are observed in any one of the treatment arms, the study will be terminated according to the stopping rule >3/first 15 patients.
Read the detailed description
The present phase II randomized study evaluates the clinical outcomes and potential treatment-related toxicity following definitive ultra-high dose per fraction external beam radiation therapy delivered with two different regimens in patients with intermediate-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate. An emerging body of data suggests that extreme hypofractionated radiation schedules, which employ ultra-high dose per fraction (≥7 Gy) in a small number of fractions (≤5), appear equal or superior to conventionally-fractionated (1.8- 2.0 Gy/fraction) and moderately hypo-fractionated schemes (2.5-3.5 Gy/fraction) in terms of both tumor control and toxicity profiles. Modern computer-driven technology enables the implementation of ultra-high hypofractionated Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) safely.
Prostate cancer patients classified according to the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines as intermediate risk (biopsy Gleason score of 7 and/or Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) level >10 and ≤20 ng/mL and/or Stage T1, T2a, T2b or T2c) are eligible for this study.
Extensive experience on extreme hypo-fractionation in prostate has been accrued over the past two years using organ stabilization by means of an endorectal balloon and urethral sparing technique with on-line target motion tracking. The standard dose prescription with this technique has been 45 Gy over 5 consecutive days.
Outcome data on intermediate risk patients treated with single dose external beam radiotherapy are not yet available, although experience on single dose High Dose Radiotherapy (HDR) brachytherapy in prostate cancer indicates similar clinical outcomes and toxicity profiles to external beam hypofractionated schedules. Experience with ultra-high single dose radiotherapy for bone and soft tissue oligometastatic prostate cancer has been consistently shown to locally control >90% prostate cancer lesions, clearly indicating sensitivity of prostate cancer tissue to this mode of cancer radiotherapy. Stage IV oligometastatic prostate cancer patients failing androgen deprivation therapy were treated according to current standard of care with single dose 24 Gy to all foci of detectable disease, including the radiation-naive intraprostatic lesions, with excellent early results, using the same technique employed in the hypofractionated setting. Overall, toxicity profiles have been thus far extremely favorable indicating the intermediate range safety of this technique when applied to whole prostate radiotherapy. These data suggest single dose therapy when properly employed is both safe and effective in managing intra-prostatic cancer settings. Taken together, these observations provide the basis for the present prospective phase II study. Patients enrolled in the study will undergo image-guided, volumetric intensity-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) with state-of-the-art treatment-planning and quality assurance procedures with emphasis on normal tissue sparing and delivery accuracy via the use of devices that ensure stability and beam location reproducibility. A rectal balloon with air filling will be used for prostate target immobilization and anatomical reproducibility, while a urethral catheter loaded with beacon transponders will be used to ensure set-up reproducibility and online target tracking. Previously untreated patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer will be prospectively randomized to receive either 45 Gy in five fractions of 9 Gy each vs. 24 Gy single-dose radiotherapy.
Patients will be followed at one month post-treatment and every 3 months for up to 12 months (+/- 4 weeks) and every 6 months thereafter. Acute and chronic toxicity evaluations will focus, though not exclusively, on urinary, rectal and sexual functions and will be assessed through validated questionnaires. Serum PSA values will be acquired with the same schedule as clinical follow-up. A multiparametric MRI will be performed at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months following intervention. Additionally, a post-treatment diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) will be performed within 15 minutes of the first treatment. Post-treatment prostate core needle biopsies will be obtained once at 24 months to evaluate pathologic response to therapy.The purpose of this scan is to measure early physiologic changes, such as perfusion and ischemia, that may correlate with clinically relevant endpoints. The study will be continuously monitored for a minimum of 5 years. In the event unexpected severe (grade ≥3) toxicities are observed in any one of the treatment arms, the study will be terminated according to the standard stopping rule >3/first 15 patients.
- Conditions
- PROSTATE CANCER
- Being tested
- IGRT 45 Gy in 5 fractions of 9 Gy, IGRT 24 Gy single dose
- Keywords
- Prostate cancer, IGRT, Hypofractionation, Extreme, Single Fraction, Urethral Sparing, MRI
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IGRT 45 Gy in 5 fractions of 9 GyRadiation
Administration of 9 Gy in five consecutive days, to a total dose of 45 Gy radiation
IGRT 24 Gy single doseRadiation
Administration of a single dose of 24 Gy in one session
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| IGRT 45 Gy in 5 fractions of 9 Gy | Active comparator | Arm A: Hypofractionated IGRT at a prescription dose of 45 Gy in 5 fractions of 9 Gy delivered in five consecutive days Receives: Radiation: IGRT 45 Gy in 5 fractions of 9 Gy |
| IGRT 24 Gy single dose | Experimental | Arm B: single fraction IGRT at a prescription dose of 24 Gy Receives: Radiation: IGRT 24 Gy single dose |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of patients with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects v4.0
Comparison of treatment related adverse events as measured by Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects v4.0 over a 5 year time frame
Measured: Participants should be followed continuously, for the duration of 5 years
Secondary outcomes (3)
Biochemical outcome based on PSA assessment
Measured: Participants should be followed at baseline and follow-up, for the duration of 5 years
Quality of life assessment based on validated questionnaires
Measured: Participants should be followed at baseline and follow-up, for the duration of 5 years
Pathological response based on biopsy at 24 months post-treatment
Measured: 24 months post-treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Study start1 Sep 2015
- Primary completion30 Sep 2017
- Study completion31 Dec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PROSTATE CANCERStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fundacao Champalimaud
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Carlo Greco, MD, Fundacao Champalimaud
- Investigators
- Carlo Greco, M.D., Principal investigator, Champalimaud Foundation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02570919
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PROSINT-IGRT A(1)
- Acronym
- PROSINT
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 2 Sep 2015
- Last updated
- 23 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Greco C, Pares O, Pimentel N, Louro V, Santiago I, Vieira S, Stroom J, Mateus D, Soares A, Marques J, Freitas E, Coelho G, Seixas M, Lopez-Beltran A, Fuks Z. Safety and Efficacy of Virtual Prostatectomy With Single-Dose Radiotherapy in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Results From the PROSINT Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021 May 1;7(5):700-708. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0039.
PubMed 33704378Bodo S, Campagne C, Thin TH, Higginson DS, Vargas HA, Hua G, Fuller JD, Ackerstaff E, Russell J, Zhang Z, Klingler S, Cho H, Kaag MG, Mazaheri Y, Rimner A, Manova-Todorova K, Epel B, Zatcky J, Cleary CR, Rao SS, Yamada Y, Zelefsky MJ, Halpern HJ, Koutcher JA, Cordon-Cardo C, Greco C, Haimovitz-Friedman A, Sala E, Powell SN, Kolesnick R, Fuks Z. Single-dose radiotherapy disables tumor cell homologous recombination via ischemia/reperfusion injury. J Clin Invest. 2019 Feb 1;129(2):786-801. doi: 10.1172/JCI97631. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
PubMed 30480549
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase II Randomized Study Comparing Ultra-high-dose Hypofractionated vs. Single-dose Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) With Urethral Sparing for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02570919
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PROSINT / PROSINT-IGRT A(1)
- Conditions
- PROSTATE CANCER
- Keywords
- Prostate cancer, IGRT, Hypofractionation, Extreme, Single Fraction, Urethral Sparing, MRI
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fundacao ChampalimaudUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The present study evaluates clinical outcomes and treatment-related toxicity following definitive ultra-high dose external beam radiotherapy delivered with two different regimens in patients with intermediate-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Modern computer-driven technology enables the implementation of ultra-high hypofractionated Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) safely.
Prostate cancer patients classified according to the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines as intermediate risk (biopsy Gleason score of 7 and/or Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) level >10 and ≤20 ng/mL and/or Stage T1, T2a, T2b or T2c) are eligible for this study.
Patients will undergo IGRT with volumetric intensity-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) with state-of-the-art treatment-planning and quality assurance procedures. Emphasis is placed on normal tissue sparing and delivery accuracy via the use of devices that ensure stability and beam location reproducibility. A rectal balloon with air filling will be used for prostate target immobilization and anatomical reproducibility, while a urethral catheter loaded with beacon transponders will be used to ensure set-up reproducibility and online target tracking. Previously untreated patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer will be prospectively randomized to receive either 45 Gy in five fractions of 9 Gy each vs. 24 Gy in a single-dose.
Patients will be followed at one month post-treatment and every 3 months for up to 12 months (+/- 4 weeks) and every 6 months thereafter. Acute and chronic toxicity evaluations will focus on urinary, rectal and sexual functions and will be assessed through validated questionnaires. Serum PSA values will be regularly acquired during follow-up. A multiparametric MRI will be performed at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months following intervention. Additionally, a post-treatment diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) will be performed within 15 minutes of the first treatment, to measure early physiologic changes, such as perfusion and ischemia, that may correlate with clinically relevant end-points. Post-treatment prostate needle biopsies will be obtained at 24 months to evaluate pathologic response to therapy. The study will be continuously monitored for a minimum of 5 years. In the event unexpected severe (grade ≥3) toxicities are observed in any one of the treatment arms, the study will be terminated according to the stopping rule >3/first 15 patients.
Detailed description
The present phase II randomized study evaluates the clinical outcomes and potential treatment-related toxicity following definitive ultra-high dose per fraction external beam radiation therapy delivered with two different regimens in patients with intermediate-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate. An emerging body of data suggests that extreme hypofractionated radiation schedules, which employ ultra-high dose per fraction (≥7 Gy) in a small number of fractions (≤5), appear equal or superior to conventionally-fractionated (1.8- 2.0 Gy/fraction) and moderately hypo-fractionated schemes (2.5-3.5 Gy/fraction) in terms of both tumor control and toxicity profiles. Modern computer-driven technology enables the implementation of ultra-high hypofractionated Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) safely.
Prostate cancer patients classified according to the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines as intermediate risk (biopsy Gleason score of 7 and/or Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) level >10 and ≤20 ng/mL and/or Stage T1, T2a, T2b or T2c) are eligible for this study.
Extensive experience on extreme hypo-fractionation in prostate has been accrued over the past two years using organ stabilization by means of an endorectal balloon and urethral sparing technique with on-line target motion tracking. The standard dose prescription with this technique has been 45 Gy over 5 consecutive days.
Outcome data on intermediate risk patients treated with single dose external beam radiotherapy are not yet available, although experience on single dose High Dose Radiotherapy (HDR) brachytherapy in prostate cancer indicates similar clinical outcomes and toxicity profiles to external beam hypofractionated schedules. Experience with ultra-high single dose radiotherapy for bone and soft tissue oligometastatic prostate cancer has been consistently shown to locally control >90% prostate cancer lesions, clearly indicating sensitivity of prostate cancer tissue to this mode of cancer radiotherapy. Stage IV oligometastatic prostate cancer patients failing androgen deprivation therapy were treated according to current standard of care with single dose 24 Gy to all foci of detectable disease, including the radiation-naive intraprostatic lesions, with excellent early results, using the same technique employed in the hypofractionated setting. Overall, toxicity profiles have been thus far extremely favorable indicating the intermediate range safety of this technique when applied to whole prostate radiotherapy. These data suggest single dose therapy when properly employed is both safe and effective in managing intra-prostatic cancer settings. Taken together, these observations provide the basis for the present prospective phase II study. Patients enrolled in the study will undergo image-guided, volumetric intensity-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) with state-of-the-art treatment-planning and quality assurance procedures with emphasis on normal tissue sparing and delivery accuracy via the use of devices that ensure stability and beam location reproducibility. A rectal balloon with air filling will be used for prostate target immobilization and anatomical reproducibility, while a urethral catheter loaded with beacon transponders will be used to ensure set-up reproducibility and online target tracking. Previously untreated patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer will be prospectively randomized to receive either 45 Gy in five fractions of 9 Gy each vs. 24 Gy single-dose radiotherapy.
Patients will be followed at one month post-treatment and every 3 months for up to 12 months (+/- 4 weeks) and every 6 months thereafter. Acute and chronic toxicity evaluations will focus, though not exclusively, on urinary, rectal and sexual functions and will be assessed through validated questionnaires. Serum PSA values will be acquired with the same schedule as clinical follow-up. A multiparametric MRI will be performed at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months following intervention. Additionally, a post-treatment diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) will be performed within 15 minutes of the first treatment. Post-treatment prostate core needle biopsies will be obtained once at 24 months to evaluate pathologic response to therapy.The purpose of this scan is to measure early physiologic changes, such as perfusion and ischemia, that may correlate with clinically relevant endpoints. The study will be continuously monitored for a minimum of 5 years. In the event unexpected severe (grade ≥3) toxicities are observed in any one of the treatment arms, the study will be terminated according to the standard stopping rule >3/first 15 patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| IGRT 45 Gy in 5 fractions of 9 Gy | Active comparator | Radiation: IGRT 45 Gy in 5 fractions of 9 GyArm A: Hypofractionated IGRT at a prescription dose of 45 Gy in 5 fractions of 9 Gy delivered in five consecutive days |
| IGRT 24 Gy single dose | Experimental | Radiation: IGRT 24 Gy single doseArm B: single fraction IGRT at a prescription dose of 24 Gy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Signed study specific informed consent form;
- Histologic confirmation of adenocarcinoma of the prostate by biopsy;
- PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL;
- Gleason score 7;
- Staging MRI must confirm American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage T1, T2a, T2b or T2c;
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Positive lymph-nodes or metastatic disease from prostate cancer on imaging studies
- Prior invasive malignancy unless disease-free for a minimum of 5 years
- Tumour Clinical stage T3 or T4 on MRI
- PSA > 20 ng/mL
- Gleason score > 7
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IGRT 45 Gy in 5 fractions of 9 GyAdministration of 9 Gy in five consecutive days, to a total dose of 45 Gy radiation | Radiation | IGRT 45 Gy in 5 fractions of 9 Gy |
| IGRT 24 Gy single doseAdministration of a single dose of 24 Gy in one session | Radiation | IGRT 24 Gy single dose |
Primary outcome
Number of patients with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects v4.0
Time frame: Participants should be followed continuously, for the duration of 5 years
Comparison of treatment related adverse events as measured by Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects v4.0 over a 5 year time frame
3 secondary outcomes
Biochemical outcome based on PSA assessment
Time frame: Participants should be followed at baseline and follow-up, for the duration of 5 years
Quality of life assessment based on validated questionnaires
Time frame: Participants should be followed at baseline and follow-up, for the duration of 5 years
Pathological response based on biopsy at 24 months post-treatment
Time frame: 24 months post-treatment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jul 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33704378Greco C, Pares O, Pimentel N, Louro V, Santiago I, Vieira S, Stroom J, Mateus D, Soares A, Marques J, Freitas E, Coelho G, Seixas M, Lopez-Beltran A, Fuks Z. Safety and Efficacy of Virtual Prostatectomy With Single-Dose Radiotherapy in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Results From the PROSINT Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021 May 1;7(5):700-708. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0039.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30480549Bodo S, Campagne C, Thin TH, Higginson DS, Vargas HA, Hua G, Fuller JD, Ackerstaff E, Russell J, Zhang Z, Klingler S, Cho H, Kaag MG, Mazaheri Y, Rimner A, Manova-Todorova K, Epel B, Zatcky J, Cleary CR, Rao SS, Yamada Y, Zelefsky MJ, Halpern HJ, Koutcher JA, Cordon-Cardo C, Greco C, Haimovitz-Friedman A, Sala E, Powell SN, Kolesnick R, Fuks Z. Single-dose radiotherapy disables tumor cell homologous recombination via ischemia/reperfusion injury. J Clin Invest. 2019 Feb 1;129(2):786-801. doi: 10.1172/JCI97631. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
Related trials for PROSTATE CANCER
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Veterans Affairs Seamless Phase II/III Randomized Trial of STAndard Systemic theRapy With or Without PET-directed Local Therapy for Oligometastatic pRosTate Cancer
Prostate Cancer, Oligometastasis
Not yet recruiting
Mind-Body Interventions for the Improvement of Quality of Life, Stress, and Sleep Quality Among Survivors of Breast, Prostate, Endometrial, or Colorectal Cancer
Breast Cancer Stage I, Colorectal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Study of Opevesostat (MK-5684) Versus Alternative NHA in mCRPC (MK-5684-003)
Prostate Cancer Metastatic
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Spatial Needle Placement Strategies and Pathological Concordance in Prostate Biopsy: A National Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
Prostate Cancer, Prostatic Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
177Lu Radiolabeled Monoclonal Antibody HuJ591 (177Lu-J591) and Ketoconazole in Patients With Prostate Cancer
Prostate Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Carlo Greco, M.D. principal investigator
Champalimaud Foundation
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing IGRT 45 Gy in 5 fractions of 9 Gy and IGRT 24 Gy single dose in people with PROSTATE CANCER, run by Fundacao Champalimaud at 1 site in Portugal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of patients with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects v4.0 (time frame: Participants should be followed continuously, for the duration of 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02570919, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2019.