Postoperative PainPhase 4NCT02571153
Low Doses of Ketamine and Postoperative Quality of Recovery
A Phase 4 study testing Ketamine 0.4 mg/kg, Normal saline and Ketamine 0.2 mg/kg in people with Postoperative Pain and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting, run by Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
There are evidences that intraoperative administration of low doses of ketamine may contribute to control the postoperative pain by acting on the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) channel, reducing the effects related to the tolerance and hyperalgesia induced by opioids. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Postoperative Pain, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
- What is being tested?
- Ketamine 0.4 mg/kg, Normal saline and Ketamine 0.2 mg/kg
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 135 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Sep 2015to May 2016
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II
- Patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Who cannot join
- Patients who refuse to participate in the study
- Patients who are not able to communicate due to alterations in the level of consciousness, or neurologic, or psychiatric disease
- Contraindication of any of the drugs used in the study
- Patients who are superobese (BMI>40)
- History of alcohol or drug dependence
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effects of Low Doses of Ketamine on Postoperative Quality of Recovery After Total Intravenous Anesthesia
There are evidences that intraoperative administration of low doses of ketamine may contribute to control the postoperative pain by acting on the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) channel, reducing the effects related to the tolerance and hyperalgesia induced by opioids. This study aims to evaluate the effects of administration of this agent not only as an analgesic but also its role in the quality of recovery from anesthesia, which includes observation of emotional, psychological and physical aspects. Patients who were scheduled to undergo total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be enrolled in this clinical study. After induction of anesthesia, patients will receive one of three solutions according to the randomly selected group: ketamine 0,2 mg/kg; ketamine 0,4 mg/kg or saline. In the recovery room and on the ward, data related to the presence of pain, analgesic consumption, the incidence of nausea and vomiting, dizziness or hallucinations will be recorded. The next day, the quality of recovery will be evaluated by application of the questionnaire QoR40 (Quality of Recovery Questionnaire-40).
Read the detailed description
Introduction It is known that nociceptive stimuli, triggered by surgery and tissue inflammation can cause peripheral sensitization and primary hyperalgesia, increases spinal responsiveness to stimuli, whether harmful or not, due to the wind-up phenomenon, and other mechanisms, with induction central sensitization. Additionally, opioids commonly employed during general anesthesia may activate, both, the antinociceptive system and the pro-nociceptive system which can lead to acute tolerance and hyperalgesia. There is evidence that NMDA receptors are involved in the development of these changes and that low doses of ketamine (< 1mg/kg) may control of postoperative pain to bind to the receptor phencyclidine the NMDA channel and inhibit the activation of the channel by glutamate non-competitively. Recently, there has been a change in pain management, which includes the observation of non-traditional variables such as those related to the concepts of satisfaction and quality of life related to health. To this end, a growing number of authors went on to assess the opinion of patients as a way to determine the quality of recovery from anesthesia, meaning the observation not only of pain intensity, but also aspects related to emotional state, comfort and independence physical. The QoR-40 questionnaire (Quality of recovery-40), a validated instrument for this purpose, allows an objective approach of these factors that can influence the perception of the patient and allows you to compare different therapeutic ways. There are no recent data on the application of this instrument to assess the effects of giving, or not, of low doses of ketamine on the quality of recovery of patients undergoing total intravenous anesthesia.
Methods After arrival in the operating room, standard American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) monitors will be applied. Midazolam 0.06 mg/kg and 1% lidocaine (30 mg) will be administered intravenously immediately after venoclysis. After anesthesia induction, capnographic monitoring will be added and the neuromuscular blockade will be evaluated using acceleromyography (TOF Watch). Induction and maintenance of anesthesia will be performed as follows: remifentanil, induction dose 0.5 μg/kg/min, followed by a maintenance dose of 0.3 μg/kg/min. Propofol, initial bolus (2.0 mg/kg) followed by infusion at 4 to 6 mg/kg/h. Each patient will receive rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) before tracheal intubation. Ventilation will be controlled by adjusting the flow volume and respiratory rate to keep the end-tidal carbon dioxid (CO2) level between 30 and 40 mmHg. In the case of inadequate depth of anesthesia (movements, sweating, tachycardia, blood pressure increase >10% of the pre-induction value), propofol infusion or sevoflurane rate will be increased (by 1%); if this was not sufficient, the remifentanil infusion rate will be also increased (by 0,1 μg/kg/min). Patients who exhibit reductions in systolic arterial pressure (SAP) greater than 30% or heart rate (HR) reductions to less than 50 bpm will be given ephedrine (10 mg) and atropine (0.5 mg), respectively. After induction patients will receive one of three intravenous solutions: ketamine 0.2 mg/kg - diluted in saline until the volume of 5 mililiters (mL) (k2 group); ketamine 0.4 mg/kg diluted in saline until the volume of 5 ml (k4 group) or 5mL of 0.9% normal saline (K0 group). Hydration will be maintained with 0.9% normal saline 2 ml/kg/h. All of the participants were given dexamethasone (8 mg) and ketoprofen (100 mg) at the onset of surgery and dimenhydrinate (30 mg), dipyrone (1 g) and morphine (0.1 mg/kg) 15 minutes prior the end of the procedure. Atropine (0.01 mg/kg) and neostigmine (0.05 mg/kg) were used to achieve T4/T1>0.9 on the TOF monitor. Extubation was performed after awakening. When stable vital signs and respiration was confirmed, all patients were transferred to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Data related to the occurrence of pain, nausea, vomiting, dizziness or hallucinations at the PACU will be recorded as will be the length of stay in the PACU. Pain will be assessed every 15 minutes using a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale, where zero meant no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain. Morphine (1 to 2 mg) will be administered intravenously every 10 minutes to maintain the pain score below 4 (1 mg when the pain score was <7 and 2 mg when it was ≥7). Following discharge from the PACU (minimum stay 60 minutes and Aldrete \& Kroulik index >9), all of the participants will be given ketoprofen (100 mg) every 12 hours and dipyrone (30 mg/kg, maximum 1 g) every six hours intravenously. Whenever patients judged that their analgesia was insufficient, tramadol (100 mg) will be administered intravenously at eight-hour minimum intervals as needed. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) will be treated with dimenhydrinate (30 mg) intravenously. Pain score, use of analgesics, and the occurrence of nausea, vomiting, and other complications during the hospital ward stay will be recorded.
QoR40 The quality of postoperative functional recovery will be assessed by the QoR40 questionnaire, which assesses five dimensions of recovery (physical comfort - 12 items; emotional state - 7 items; physical independence - 5 items; physiological support - 7 items; and pain - 7 items). Each item is rated on a five-point Likert scale: none of the time, some of the time, usually, most of the time, and all the time. The total score on the QoR40 ranges from 40 (poorest quality of recovery) to 200 (best quality of recovery). The QoR40 will be administered by a blind investigator 24 hours after surgery.
- Being tested
- Ketamine 0.4 mg/kg, Normal saline, Ketamine 0.2 mg/kg
- Keywords
- Intravenous anesthesia, Postoperative nausea vomiting, Postoperative pain, Patient satisfaction, Quality of health care, Ketamine
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting, Patient Satisfaction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ketamine 0.4 mg/kgDrug
Intravenous ketamine 0.4 mg/kg after induction of anesthesia
Normal salineDrug
Intravenous normal saline 0.9% 5 mL
Ketamine 0.2 mg/kgDrug
Intravenous ketamine 0.2 mg/kg after induction of anesthesia
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Saline group | Placebo comparator | Normal saline 0.9% (5 mL) Receives: Drug: Normal saline |
| Ketamine 0.2 | Experimental | ketamine 0.2 mg/kg (5 mL) Receives: Drug: Ketamine 0.2 mg/kg |
| Ketamine 0.4 | Experimental | ketamine 0.4 mg/kg (5 mL) Receives: Drug: Ketamine 0.4 mg/kg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of Postoperative Recovery Assessed by QoR-40 Questionnaire 24 Hours After Surgery
Quality of postoperative functional recovery assessed by the questionnaire QoR40 The quality of postoperative functional recovery was assessed by the QoR-40 questionnaire, which assesses five dimensions of recovery (physical comfort - 12 items; emotional state - 7 items; physical independence - 5 items; physiological support - 7 items; and pain - 7 items). Each item was rated on a five-point Likert scale: none of the time, some of the time, usually, most of the time, and all the time. The total score on the QoR-40 ranges from 40 (poorest quality of recovery) to 200 (best quality of recovery). The QoR-40 was administered by a blind investigator 24 hours after surgery.
Measured: 24 hours
Secondary outcomes (6)
Length of PACU Stay
Length of stay at postanesthesia recovery room
Measured: During the stay at postanesthesia recovery room (about 90 to 120 minutes)
Occurrence of Postoperative, Nausea and Vomiting
Percentage of participants with postoperative nausea and vomiting at the PACU and during the hospital ward stay
Measured: 24 hours
Occurrence of Pain at PACU Using a 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Occurrence of pain at the PACU. Average Pain will be calculated. The pain score will be evaluated using a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale, where zero mean no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain.
Measured: 90 minutes postanesthesia at recovery room
Morphine Consumption (mg) at PACU
Morphine consumption (mg) at PACU (about 90 to 120 minutes)
Measured: During the stay at postanesthesia recovery room (about 90 to 120 minutes)
The Severity of Postoperative Pain
The severity of postoperative pain was rated the higher score of pain (NRS) during the hospital ward stay.
Pain was evaluated using a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale (NRS), where zero meant no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain.
Measured: 24 hours
Percentage of Participants With Tramadol Consumption
Percentage of Participants with Tramadol during the ward stay
Measured: 24 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2015
- Primary completionMar 2016
- Study completionMay 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Postoperative PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 135 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Eduardo Toshiyuki Moro, Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo
- Investigators
- Eduardo T Moro, PhD, Principal investigator, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Pontificial Catholic University of São Paulo - PUCSP
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02571153
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PUCSP 057539/2015
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 2 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 6 Mar 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Xie H, Wang X, Liu G, Wang G. Analgesic effects and pharmacokinetics of a low dose of ketamine preoperatively administered epidurally or intravenously. Clin J Pain. 2003 Sep-Oct;19(5):317-22. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200309000-00006.
PubMed 12966258Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.
PubMed 10740540Wu L, Huang X, Sun L. The efficacy of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists on improving the postoperative pain intensity and satisfaction after remifentanil-based anesthesia in adults: a meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2015 Jun;27(4):311-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.03.020. Epub 2015 Mar 29.
PubMed 25824051Pfenninger EG, Durieux ME, Himmelseher S. Cognitive impairment after small-dose ketamine isomers in comparison to equianalgesic racemic ketamine in human volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2002 Feb;96(2):357-66. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200202000-00022.
PubMed 11818769Kissin I, Bright CA, Bradley EL Jr. The effect of ketamine on opioid-induced acute tolerance: can it explain reduction of opioid consumption with ketamine-opioid analgesic combinations? Anesth Analg. 2000 Dec;91(6):1483-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200012000-00035.
PubMed 11094005
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Mar 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Low Doses of Ketamine on Postoperative Quality of Recovery After Total Intravenous Anesthesia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02571153
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PUCSP 057539/2015
- Keywords
- Intravenous anesthesia, Postoperative nausea vomiting, Postoperative pain, Patient satisfaction, Quality of health care, Ketamine
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 135 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao PauloUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2015
- Primary completion
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 Mar 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There are evidences that intraoperative administration of low doses of ketamine may contribute to control the postoperative pain by acting on the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) channel, reducing the effects related to the tolerance and hyperalgesia induced by opioids. This study aims to evaluate the effects of administration of this agent not only as an analgesic but also its role in the quality of recovery from anesthesia, which includes observation of emotional, psychological and physical aspects. Patients who were scheduled to undergo total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be enrolled in this clinical study. After induction of anesthesia, patients will receive one of three solutions according to the randomly selected group: ketamine 0,2 mg/kg; ketamine 0,4 mg/kg or saline. In the recovery room and on the ward, data related to the presence of pain, analgesic consumption, the incidence of nausea and vomiting, dizziness or hallucinations will be recorded. The next day, the quality of recovery will be evaluated by application of the questionnaire QoR40 (Quality of Recovery Questionnaire-40).
Detailed description
Introduction It is known that nociceptive stimuli, triggered by surgery and tissue inflammation can cause peripheral sensitization and primary hyperalgesia, increases spinal responsiveness to stimuli, whether harmful or not, due to the wind-up phenomenon, and other mechanisms, with induction central sensitization. Additionally, opioids commonly employed during general anesthesia may activate, both, the antinociceptive system and the pro-nociceptive system which can lead to acute tolerance and hyperalgesia. There is evidence that NMDA receptors are involved in the development of these changes and that low doses of ketamine (< 1mg/kg) may control of postoperative pain to bind to the receptor phencyclidine the NMDA channel and inhibit the activation of the channel by glutamate non-competitively. Recently, there has been a change in pain management, which includes the observation of non-traditional variables such as those related to the concepts of satisfaction and quality of life related to health. To this end, a growing number of authors went on to assess the opinion of patients as a way to determine the quality of recovery from anesthesia, meaning the observation not only of pain intensity, but also aspects related to emotional state, comfort and independence physical. The QoR-40 questionnaire (Quality of recovery-40), a validated instrument for this purpose, allows an objective approach of these factors that can influence the perception of the patient and allows you to compare different therapeutic ways. There are no recent data on the application of this instrument to assess the effects of giving, or not, of low doses of ketamine on the quality of recovery of patients undergoing total intravenous anesthesia.
Methods After arrival in the operating room, standard American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) monitors will be applied. Midazolam 0.06 mg/kg and 1% lidocaine (30 mg) will be administered intravenously immediately after venoclysis. After anesthesia induction, capnographic monitoring will be added and the neuromuscular blockade will be evaluated using acceleromyography (TOF Watch). Induction and maintenance of anesthesia will be performed as follows: remifentanil, induction dose 0.5 μg/kg/min, followed by a maintenance dose of 0.3 μg/kg/min. Propofol, initial bolus (2.0 mg/kg) followed by infusion at 4 to 6 mg/kg/h. Each patient will receive rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) before tracheal intubation. Ventilation will be controlled by adjusting the flow volume and respiratory rate to keep the end-tidal carbon dioxid (CO2) level between 30 and 40 mmHg. In the case of inadequate depth of anesthesia (movements, sweating, tachycardia, blood pressure increase >10% of the pre-induction value), propofol infusion or sevoflurane rate will be increased (by 1%); if this was not sufficient, the remifentanil infusion rate will be also increased (by 0,1 μg/kg/min). Patients who exhibit reductions in systolic arterial pressure (SAP) greater than 30% or heart rate (HR) reductions to less than 50 bpm will be given ephedrine (10 mg) and atropine (0.5 mg), respectively. After induction patients will receive one of three intravenous solutions: ketamine 0.2 mg/kg - diluted in saline until the volume of 5 mililiters (mL) (k2 group); ketamine 0.4 mg/kg diluted in saline until the volume of 5 ml (k4 group) or 5mL of 0.9% normal saline (K0 group). Hydration will be maintained with 0.9% normal saline 2 ml/kg/h. All of the participants were given dexamethasone (8 mg) and ketoprofen (100 mg) at the onset of surgery and dimenhydrinate (30 mg), dipyrone (1 g) and morphine (0.1 mg/kg) 15 minutes prior the end of the procedure. Atropine (0.01 mg/kg) and neostigmine (0.05 mg/kg) were used to achieve T4/T1>0.9 on the TOF monitor. Extubation was performed after awakening. When stable vital signs and respiration was confirmed, all patients were transferred to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Data related to the occurrence of pain, nausea, vomiting, dizziness or hallucinations at the PACU will be recorded as will be the length of stay in the PACU. Pain will be assessed every 15 minutes using a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale, where zero meant no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain. Morphine (1 to 2 mg) will be administered intravenously every 10 minutes to maintain the pain score below 4 (1 mg when the pain score was <7 and 2 mg when it was ≥7). Following discharge from the PACU (minimum stay 60 minutes and Aldrete \& Kroulik index >9), all of the participants will be given ketoprofen (100 mg) every 12 hours and dipyrone (30 mg/kg, maximum 1 g) every six hours intravenously. Whenever patients judged that their analgesia was insufficient, tramadol (100 mg) will be administered intravenously at eight-hour minimum intervals as needed. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) will be treated with dimenhydrinate (30 mg) intravenously. Pain score, use of analgesics, and the occurrence of nausea, vomiting, and other complications during the hospital ward stay will be recorded.
QoR40 The quality of postoperative functional recovery will be assessed by the QoR40 questionnaire, which assesses five dimensions of recovery (physical comfort - 12 items; emotional state - 7 items; physical independence - 5 items; physiological support - 7 items; and pain - 7 items). Each item is rated on a five-point Likert scale: none of the time, some of the time, usually, most of the time, and all the time. The total score on the QoR40 ranges from 40 (poorest quality of recovery) to 200 (best quality of recovery). The QoR40 will be administered by a blind investigator 24 hours after surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Saline group | Placebo comparator | Drug: Normal salineNormal saline 0.9% (5 mL) |
| Ketamine 0.2 | Experimental | Drug: Ketamine 0.2 mg/kgketamine 0.2 mg/kg (5 mL) |
| Ketamine 0.4 | Experimental | Drug: Ketamine 0.4 mg/kgketamine 0.4 mg/kg (5 mL) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II
- Patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients who refuse to participate in the study
- Patients who are not able to communicate due to alterations in the level of consciousness, or neurologic, or psychiatric disease
- Contraindication of any of the drugs used in the study
- Patients who are superobese (BMI>40)
- History of alcohol or drug dependence
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ketamine 0.4 mg/kgIntravenous ketamine 0.4 mg/kg after induction of anesthesia | Drug | Ketamine 0.4 |
| Normal salineIntravenous normal saline 0.9% 5 mL | Drug | Saline group |
| Ketamine 0.2 mg/kgIntravenous ketamine 0.2 mg/kg after induction of anesthesia | Drug | Ketamine 0.2 |
Primary outcome
Quality of Postoperative Recovery Assessed by QoR-40 Questionnaire 24 Hours After Surgery
Time frame: 24 hours
Quality of postoperative functional recovery assessed by the questionnaire QoR40 The quality of postoperative functional recovery was assessed by the QoR-40 questionnaire, which assesses five dimensions of recovery (physical comfort - 12 items; emotional state - 7 items; physical independence - 5 items; physiological support - 7 items; and pain - 7 items). Each item was rated on a five-point Likert scale: none of the time, some of the time, usually, most of the time, and all the time. The total score on the QoR-40 ranges from 40 (poorest quality of recovery) to 200 (best quality of recovery). The QoR-40 was administered by a blind investigator 24 hours after surgery.
6 secondary outcomes
Length of PACU Stay
Time frame: During the stay at postanesthesia recovery room (about 90 to 120 minutes)
Occurrence of Postoperative, Nausea and Vomiting
Time frame: 24 hours
Occurrence of Pain at PACU Using a 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Time frame: 90 minutes postanesthesia at recovery room
Morphine Consumption (mg) at PACU
Time frame: During the stay at postanesthesia recovery room (about 90 to 120 minutes)
The Severity of Postoperative Pain
Time frame: 24 hours
Percentage of Participants With Tramadol Consumption
Time frame: 24 hours
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Mar 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 12966258Xie H, Wang X, Liu G, Wang G. Analgesic effects and pharmacokinetics of a low dose of ketamine preoperatively administered epidurally or intravenously. Clin J Pain. 2003 Sep-Oct;19(5):317-22. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200309000-00006.
- Background: PubMed 10740540Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.
- Background: PubMed 25824051Wu L, Huang X, Sun L. The efficacy of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists on improving the postoperative pain intensity and satisfaction after remifentanil-based anesthesia in adults: a meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2015 Jun;27(4):311-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.03.020. Epub 2015 Mar 29.
- Background: PubMed 11818769Pfenninger EG, Durieux ME, Himmelseher S. Cognitive impairment after small-dose ketamine isomers in comparison to equianalgesic racemic ketamine in human volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2002 Feb;96(2):357-66. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200202000-00022.
- Background: PubMed 11094005Kissin I, Bright CA, Bradley EL Jr. The effect of ketamine on opioid-induced acute tolerance: can it explain reduction of opioid consumption with ketamine-opioid analgesic combinations? Anesth Analg. 2000 Dec;91(6):1483-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200012000-00035.
Related trials for Postoperative Pain
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
Recruiting
Effect of Cryotherapeutic and Nanotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite on Post-Operative Endodontic Pain.
Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis, Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis
RecruitingPhase 2
REctus Sheath Trial
Acute Pain, Postoperative Pain, Acute
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS) Using Magnesium Sulfate Added to Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery and Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain
Breast Cancer, Postoperative Pain
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Pain in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section at Assuit University Hospital
Cesarean Section
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eduardo T Moro, PhD principal investigator
School of Medical and Health Sciences, Pontificial Catholic University of São Paulo - PUCSP
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Ketamine 0.4 mg/kg, Normal saline and Ketamine 0.2 mg/kg in people with Postoperative Pain and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting, run by Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Mar 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of Postoperative Recovery Assessed by QoR-40 Questionnaire 24 Hours After Surgery (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02571153, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2017.