HIVPrEP-HIVDNCT02572505
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis and Timed Intercourse for HIV-Discordant Couples
A study testing Truvada in people with HIV and Infertility, run by University of Missouri-Columbia at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has now become a treatable disease and many infected individuals are interested in having a family. Couples in which the man is infected but the woman is HIV-negative (hereafter referred to as HIV-discordant) require medical intervention during procreation to prevent HIV… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV, Infertility
- What is being tested?
- Truvada
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2015to 20 Sep 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Woman:
- 18-40 years of age
- not pregnant
- BMI 18.5-30
- nonsmoker
- no use of IV drugs
Show all 24Show fewer
- seronegative for HIV
- negative tests for hepatitis C and hepatitis B, human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV I\&II), syphilis, Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhea
- normal fertility examination
- normal PAP smear and HPV screen
- Man:
- 18-50 years of age
- nonsmoker
- no use of IV drugs
- HIV-seropositive
- under the care of an infectious disease specialist
- without evidence of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)
- HIV viral load <50,000 copies/mL and CD4 count > 250 cells/mL for the preceding 6 month period
- taking anti-retroviral medication
- must be circumcised
- have 2 normal semen analyses
- Couple:
- must be informed of safer choices (donor insemination, adoption, remaining childless)
- must attest to safe sexual practices.
Who cannot join
- either man or woman is incarcerated
- either man or woman is unable to provide informed consent
- woman is unable to take Truvada (tenofovir/emtricitabine) medication due to contraindications or adverse reaction
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Missouri Center for Reproductive Medicine & Fertility
Columbia, Missouri
About this study
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has now become a treatable disease and many infected individuals are interested in having a family. Couples in which the man is infected but the woman is HIV-negative (hereafter referred to as HIV-discordant) require medical intervention during procreation to prevent HIV transmission to the female and her child. The current view is that reducing the number of infections involving unprotected intercourse in HIV-discordant couples is a public health issue in the U.S. The safest methods for HIV-discordant couples are insemination using a sperm donor, adoption and remaining childless. However, some couples strongly desire a biologically related child. Fertility clinics in the United States have been resistant to treating HIV-discordant couples, offering only expensive, invasive techniques. This reduces access to care, leading to couples choosing unprotected intercourse to conceive a child. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a treatment taken by the woman before having unprotected intercourse with an infected man. Truvada has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to reduce the risk of HIV-discordant couples and the Centers for Disease Control and prevention (CDC) has recommended that serodiscordant patients who wish to have a child be counseled on the availability of PrEP. When risks of transmission are minimized, including undetectable HIV in blood and use of PrEP, unprotected intercourse during the fertile period is likely to be a safe option for conceiving a child. The investigators propose to enroll HIV-discordant couples who have been counseled on the safer alternatives of donor insemination, adoption and remaining childless; have been offered referral to a clinic offering sperm washing with insemination or in vitro fertilization (IVF); have been apprised of the risks of using PrEP and one timed intercourse per cycle; and decide to proceed with this method. Couples will be from the population of HIV-discordant patients with a minimal risk of disease transmission as described above. After evaluation for normal fertility and low potential for disease transmission, the couple will receive instruction on timing of the most fertile day of the cycle, and the woman will be given a prescription for the PrEP medication. The woman and any offspring will be followed for 6 months using blood tests to check for evidence of HIV infection.
Read the detailed description
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has now become a treatable disease and many infected individuals are interested in having a family. Couples in which the man is infected but the woman is HIV-negative (hereafter referred to as HIV-discordant) require medical intervention during procreation to prevent HIV transmission to the female and her child. The current view is that reducing the number of infections involving unprotected intercourse in HIV-discordant couples is a public health issue in the U.S.
The risk of HIV transmission by regular intercourse in HIV-discordant couples in a stable relationship is about 1 case for every 1000 sexual acts. However, the risk is extremely low if 1) the couple is monogamous; 2) there is no intravenous (IV) drug use; 3) the man has low HIV viral load, a high CD4 count (CD4 cells are white blood cells that are attacked by HIV), and no symptoms of the disease; 4) the couple is free of other sexually transmitted infections; 5) the male and female genital tracts are free of sores; 6) the man is circumcised; and 7) the man is taking antiretroviral treatment (ART). In fact, studies in African HIV-discordant couples have found no transmission of HIV if patients either have low blood levels of HIV, no symptoms of HIV infection or are taking ART.
The safest methods for HIV-discordant couples are insemination using a sperm donor, adoption and remaining childless. However, some couples strongly desire a biologically related child. Fertility clinics in the U.S. have been resistant to treating HIV-discordant couples. Generally, the available treatment in the U.S. involves in vitro fertilization (IVF), which involves collecting sperm and eggs from the couple and allowing fertilization to occur in the laboratory, with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), in which a single sperm is injected directly into the egg. One cycle of treatment costs more than 20% of the median annual income in the U.S., and the birth rate with this method is approximately 35% per cycle of treatment. These factors significantly reduce access to care, and studies have shown that when access to care is low, many couples will choose to use unprotected intercourse, even if counseled on the risks involved. Without appropriate screening and counseling, unprotected intercourse is risky, with 4% of women becoming infected in one study
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a treatment taken by the woman before having unprotected intercourse with an infected man. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the drug Truvada (Tenofovir/emtricitabine) for use by HIV-discordant couples. Whereas IVF and ICSI are invasive techniques that breach the natural barriers to infection in the female reproductive tract, intercourse preserves these protective mechanisms. The goals of treating HIV-discordant couples are to reduce the infectivity of the male and the susceptibility of the female to infection. Trials carried out primarily in Africa looking at HIV transmission in HIV-discordant couples have shown that use of PrEP significantly reduces the risk of transmission. Based on these results, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and prevention (CDC) has recommended that serodiscordant patients who wish to have a child be counseled on the availability of PrEP. When risks of transmission are minimized, including undetectable HIV in blood and the use of PrEP, unprotected intercourse during the fertile period is likely to be a safe option for conceiving a child.
An ongoing Swiss trial, started in 2004, has had no infection of the female in 53 couples, and has had an overall pregnancy rate of 75% after 6 cycles of treatment. Preliminary data from a United Kingdom trial reports 13 couples with 11 pregnancies and no female infection. An Italian trial has been initiated recently. Treatment of HIV-discordant couples with PrEP and timed, unprotected intercourse remains experimental.
The investigators propose to enroll HIV-discordant couples who have been counseled on the safer alternatives of donor insemination, adoption and remaining childless; have been offered referral to a clinic offering sperm washing with insemination or ICSI; have been apprised of the risks of using PrEP and one timed intercourse per cycle; and decide to proceed with this method. Couples will be from the population of HIV-discordant patients with a minimal risk of disease transmission as described above. After evaluation for normal fertility and low potential for disease transmission, the couple will receive instruction on timing of the most fertile day of the cycle, and the woman will be given a prescription for the PrEP medication. The woman and any offspring will be followed for 6 months using blood tests to check for evidence of HIV infection.
- Conditions
- HIV, Infertility
- Being tested
- Truvada
- Keywords
- HIV-Discordant, Preexposure Prophylaxis
- Medical subject headings
- Infertility
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TruvadaDrug
Also called HIV-D, PrEP, Gilead Sciences, emtricitabine
Female patient will take Truvada and use condoms for each act of intercourse except once at the optimal time for fertility.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HIV-Discordant Couple | Experimental | A couple in which the man is HIV-seropositive and the woman is HIV-seronegative who wish to have a biologically related child. Couple will use condoms for all sexual acts except one act of unprotected intercourse during the fertile period when the woman will be taking the drug Truvada. Receives: Drug: Truvada |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of women remaining HIV-seronegative for 6 months after a treatment menstrual cycle
After having one act of unprotected intercourse at the woman's fertile period, she will be tested at 6 months by HIV Ab test. Outcome will be reported as proportion of women becoming HIV-seropositive after one cycle of treatment. It is expected that this will be zero.
Measured: 6 months after each menstrual cycle in which HIV-discordant couple has one act of unprotected intercourse
Secondary outcomes (1)
Proportion of couples achieving pregnancy after each treatment menstrual cycle.
If the woman does not start menses after treatment cycle, pregnancy will be measured by serum hCG.
Measured: Approximately one month after unprotected intercourse
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2015
- Primary completion20 Sep 2017
- Study completion20 Sep 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (23)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIVStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Missouri-Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Erma Drobnis, University of Missouri-Columbia
- Investigators
- Danny J Schust, M.D., Principal investigator, University of Missouri-Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02572505
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB #2002937
- Acronym
- PrEP-HIVD
- Status last verified
- Oct 2017
- First submitted
- 6 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 6 Oct 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
ACOG Committee Opinion no 595: Committee on Gynecologic Practice: Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 May;123(5):1133-1136. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000446855.78026.21.
PubMed 24785877Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Recommendations for reducing the risk of viral transmission during fertility treatment with the use of autologous gametes: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013 Feb;99(2):340-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.028. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
PubMed 22975112Barreiro P, Castilla JA, Labarga P, Soriano V. Is natural conception a valid option for HIV-serodiscordant couples? Hum Reprod. 2007 Sep;22(9):2353-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem226. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
PubMed 17640945Daar ES, Daar JF. Human immunodeficiency virus and fertility care: embarking on a path of knowledge and access. Fertil Steril. 2006 Feb;85(2):298-300; discussion 301. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.018.
PubMed 16595202De Carli G, Palummieri A, Liuzzi G, Puro V. Safe conception for human immunodeficiency virus-discordant couples: the preexposure prophylaxis for conception alternative. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;210(1):90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.011. Epub 2013 Aug 14. No abstract available.
PubMed 23954529de Vincenzi I. A longitudinal study of human immunodeficiency virus transmission by heterosexual partners. European Study Group on Heterosexual Transmission of HIV. N Engl J Med. 1994 Aug 11;331(6):341-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199408113310601.
PubMed 8028613Del Romero J, Castilla J, Hernando V, Rodriguez C, Garcia S. Combined antiretroviral treatment and heterosexual transmission of HIV-1: cross sectional and prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2010 May 14;340:c2205. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2205.
PubMed 20472675Downs AM, De Vincenzi I. Probability of heterosexual transmission of HIV: relationship to the number of unprotected sexual contacts. European Study Group in Heterosexual Transmission of HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1996 Apr 1;11(4):388-95. doi: 10.1097/00042560-199604010-00010.
PubMed 8601226Frodsham LC, Boag F, Barton S, Gilling-Smith C. Human immunodeficiency virus infection and fertility care in the United Kingdom: demand and supply. Fertil Steril. 2006 Feb;85(2):285-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1326.
PubMed 16595198Gilling-Smith C, Nicopoullos JD, Semprini AE, Frodsham LC. HIV and reproductive care--a review of current practice. BJOG. 2006 Aug;113(8):869-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00960.x. Epub 2006 Jun 2.
PubMed 16753050Gray RH, Wawer MJ, Brookmeyer R, Sewankambo NK, Serwadda D, Wabwire-Mangen F, Lutalo T, Li X, vanCott T, Quinn TC; Rakai Project Team. Probability of HIV-1 transmission per coital act in monogamous, heterosexual, HIV-1-discordant couples in Rakai, Uganda. Lancet. 2001 Apr 14;357(9263):1149-53. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04331-2.
PubMed 11323041Klein J, Pena JE, Thornton MH, Sauer MV. Understanding the motivations, concerns, and desires of human immunodeficiency virus 1-serodiscordant couples wishing to have children through assisted reproduction. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;101(5 Pt 1):987-94. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00012-7.
PubMed 12738162Lampe MA, Smith DK, Anderson GJ, Edwards AE, Nesheim SR. Achieving safe conception in HIV-discordant couples: the potential role of oral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;204(6):488.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.02.026. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
PubMed 21457911Mandelbrot L, Heard I, Henrion-Geant E, Henrion R. Natural conception in HIV-negative women with HIV-infected partners. Lancet. 1997 Mar 22;349(9055):850-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61754-0. No abstract available.
PubMed 9121267Mastro TD, de Vincenzi I. Probabilities of sexual HIV-1 transmission. AIDS. 1996;10 Suppl A:S75-82. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199601001-00011. No abstract available.
PubMed 8883613
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Oct 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis and Timed Intercourse for HIV-Discordant Couples
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02572505
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PrEP-HIVD / IRB #2002937
- Conditions
- HIV, Infertility
- Keywords
- HIV-Discordant, Preexposure Prophylaxis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Withdrawn
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Missouri-ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Sep 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has now become a treatable disease and many infected individuals are interested in having a family. Couples in which the man is infected but the woman is HIV-negative (hereafter referred to as HIV-discordant) require medical intervention during procreation to prevent HIV transmission to the female and her child. The current view is that reducing the number of infections involving unprotected intercourse in HIV-discordant couples is a public health issue in the U.S. The safest methods for HIV-discordant couples are insemination using a sperm donor, adoption and remaining childless. However, some couples strongly desire a biologically related child. Fertility clinics in the United States have been resistant to treating HIV-discordant couples, offering only expensive, invasive techniques. This reduces access to care, leading to couples choosing unprotected intercourse to conceive a child. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a treatment taken by the woman before having unprotected intercourse with an infected man. Truvada has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to reduce the risk of HIV-discordant couples and the Centers for Disease Control and prevention (CDC) has recommended that serodiscordant patients who wish to have a child be counseled on the availability of PrEP. When risks of transmission are minimized, including undetectable HIV in blood and use of PrEP, unprotected intercourse during the fertile period is likely to be a safe option for conceiving a child. The investigators propose to enroll HIV-discordant couples who have been counseled on the safer alternatives of donor insemination, adoption and remaining childless; have been offered referral to a clinic offering sperm washing with insemination or in vitro fertilization (IVF); have been apprised of the risks of using PrEP and one timed intercourse per cycle; and decide to proceed with this method. Couples will be from the population of HIV-discordant patients with a minimal risk of disease transmission as described above. After evaluation for normal fertility and low potential for disease transmission, the couple will receive instruction on timing of the most fertile day of the cycle, and the woman will be given a prescription for the PrEP medication. The woman and any offspring will be followed for 6 months using blood tests to check for evidence of HIV infection.
Detailed description
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has now become a treatable disease and many infected individuals are interested in having a family. Couples in which the man is infected but the woman is HIV-negative (hereafter referred to as HIV-discordant) require medical intervention during procreation to prevent HIV transmission to the female and her child. The current view is that reducing the number of infections involving unprotected intercourse in HIV-discordant couples is a public health issue in the U.S.
The risk of HIV transmission by regular intercourse in HIV-discordant couples in a stable relationship is about 1 case for every 1000 sexual acts. However, the risk is extremely low if 1) the couple is monogamous; 2) there is no intravenous (IV) drug use; 3) the man has low HIV viral load, a high CD4 count (CD4 cells are white blood cells that are attacked by HIV), and no symptoms of the disease; 4) the couple is free of other sexually transmitted infections; 5) the male and female genital tracts are free of sores; 6) the man is circumcised; and 7) the man is taking antiretroviral treatment (ART). In fact, studies in African HIV-discordant couples have found no transmission of HIV if patients either have low blood levels of HIV, no symptoms of HIV infection or are taking ART.
The safest methods for HIV-discordant couples are insemination using a sperm donor, adoption and remaining childless. However, some couples strongly desire a biologically related child. Fertility clinics in the U.S. have been resistant to treating HIV-discordant couples. Generally, the available treatment in the U.S. involves in vitro fertilization (IVF), which involves collecting sperm and eggs from the couple and allowing fertilization to occur in the laboratory, with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), in which a single sperm is injected directly into the egg. One cycle of treatment costs more than 20% of the median annual income in the U.S., and the birth rate with this method is approximately 35% per cycle of treatment. These factors significantly reduce access to care, and studies have shown that when access to care is low, many couples will choose to use unprotected intercourse, even if counseled on the risks involved. Without appropriate screening and counseling, unprotected intercourse is risky, with 4% of women becoming infected in one study
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a treatment taken by the woman before having unprotected intercourse with an infected man. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the drug Truvada (Tenofovir/emtricitabine) for use by HIV-discordant couples. Whereas IVF and ICSI are invasive techniques that breach the natural barriers to infection in the female reproductive tract, intercourse preserves these protective mechanisms. The goals of treating HIV-discordant couples are to reduce the infectivity of the male and the susceptibility of the female to infection. Trials carried out primarily in Africa looking at HIV transmission in HIV-discordant couples have shown that use of PrEP significantly reduces the risk of transmission. Based on these results, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and prevention (CDC) has recommended that serodiscordant patients who wish to have a child be counseled on the availability of PrEP. When risks of transmission are minimized, including undetectable HIV in blood and the use of PrEP, unprotected intercourse during the fertile period is likely to be a safe option for conceiving a child.
An ongoing Swiss trial, started in 2004, has had no infection of the female in 53 couples, and has had an overall pregnancy rate of 75% after 6 cycles of treatment. Preliminary data from a United Kingdom trial reports 13 couples with 11 pregnancies and no female infection. An Italian trial has been initiated recently. Treatment of HIV-discordant couples with PrEP and timed, unprotected intercourse remains experimental.
The investigators propose to enroll HIV-discordant couples who have been counseled on the safer alternatives of donor insemination, adoption and remaining childless; have been offered referral to a clinic offering sperm washing with insemination or ICSI; have been apprised of the risks of using PrEP and one timed intercourse per cycle; and decide to proceed with this method. Couples will be from the population of HIV-discordant patients with a minimal risk of disease transmission as described above. After evaluation for normal fertility and low potential for disease transmission, the couple will receive instruction on timing of the most fertile day of the cycle, and the woman will be given a prescription for the PrEP medication. The woman and any offspring will be followed for 6 months using blood tests to check for evidence of HIV infection.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HIV-Discordant Couple | Experimental | Drug: TruvadaA couple in which the man is HIV-seropositive and the woman is HIV-seronegative who wish to have a biologically related child. Couple will use condoms for all sexual acts except one act of unprotected intercourse during the fertile period when the woman will be taking the drug Truvada. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (24 listed)
- 18-40 years of age
- not pregnant
- BMI 18.5-30
- nonsmoker
- no use of IV drugs
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- either man or woman is incarcerated
- either man or woman is unable to provide informed consent
- woman is unable to take Truvada (tenofovir/emtricitabine) medication due to contraindications or adverse reaction
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TruvadaAlso: HIV-D, PrEP, Gilead Sciences, emtricitabineFemale patient will take Truvada and use condoms for each act of intercourse except once at the optimal time for fertility. | Drug | HIV-Discordant Couple |
Primary outcome
Proportion of women remaining HIV-seronegative for 6 months after a treatment menstrual cycle
Time frame: 6 months after each menstrual cycle in which HIV-discordant couple has one act of unprotected intercourse
After having one act of unprotected intercourse at the woman's fertile period, she will be tested at 6 months by HIV Ab test. Outcome will be reported as proportion of women becoming HIV-seropositive after one cycle of treatment. It is expected that this will be zero.
1 secondary outcome
Proportion of couples achieving pregnancy after each treatment menstrual cycle.
Time frame: Approximately one month after unprotected intercourse
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Oct 2017.
- Background: PubMed 24785877ACOG Committee Opinion no 595: Committee on Gynecologic Practice: Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 May;123(5):1133-1136. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000446855.78026.21.
- Background: PubMed 22975112Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Recommendations for reducing the risk of viral transmission during fertility treatment with the use of autologous gametes: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013 Feb;99(2):340-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.028. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
- Background: PubMed 17640945Barreiro P, Castilla JA, Labarga P, Soriano V. Is natural conception a valid option for HIV-serodiscordant couples? Hum Reprod. 2007 Sep;22(9):2353-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem226. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
- Background: PubMed 16595202Daar ES, Daar JF. Human immunodeficiency virus and fertility care: embarking on a path of knowledge and access. Fertil Steril. 2006 Feb;85(2):298-300; discussion 301. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.018.
- Background: PubMed 23954529De Carli G, Palummieri A, Liuzzi G, Puro V. Safe conception for human immunodeficiency virus-discordant couples: the preexposure prophylaxis for conception alternative. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;210(1):90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.011. Epub 2013 Aug 14. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 8028613de Vincenzi I. A longitudinal study of human immunodeficiency virus transmission by heterosexual partners. European Study Group on Heterosexual Transmission of HIV. N Engl J Med. 1994 Aug 11;331(6):341-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199408113310601.
- Background: PubMed 20472675Del Romero J, Castilla J, Hernando V, Rodriguez C, Garcia S. Combined antiretroviral treatment and heterosexual transmission of HIV-1: cross sectional and prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2010 May 14;340:c2205. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2205.
- Background: PubMed 8601226Downs AM, De Vincenzi I. Probability of heterosexual transmission of HIV: relationship to the number of unprotected sexual contacts. European Study Group in Heterosexual Transmission of HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1996 Apr 1;11(4):388-95. doi: 10.1097/00042560-199604010-00010.
- Background: PubMed 16595198Frodsham LC, Boag F, Barton S, Gilling-Smith C. Human immunodeficiency virus infection and fertility care in the United Kingdom: demand and supply. Fertil Steril. 2006 Feb;85(2):285-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1326.
- Background: PubMed 16753050Gilling-Smith C, Nicopoullos JD, Semprini AE, Frodsham LC. HIV and reproductive care--a review of current practice. BJOG. 2006 Aug;113(8):869-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00960.x. Epub 2006 Jun 2.
- Background: PubMed 11323041Gray RH, Wawer MJ, Brookmeyer R, Sewankambo NK, Serwadda D, Wabwire-Mangen F, Lutalo T, Li X, vanCott T, Quinn TC; Rakai Project Team. Probability of HIV-1 transmission per coital act in monogamous, heterosexual, HIV-1-discordant couples in Rakai, Uganda. Lancet. 2001 Apr 14;357(9263):1149-53. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04331-2.
- Background: PubMed 12738162Klein J, Pena JE, Thornton MH, Sauer MV. Understanding the motivations, concerns, and desires of human immunodeficiency virus 1-serodiscordant couples wishing to have children through assisted reproduction. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;101(5 Pt 1):987-94. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00012-7.
Related trials for HIV
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Adapting the ESTEEM Intervention to Improve Mental Health and PrEP Uptake Among Men at Risk of HIV
PrEP Use
RecruitingPhase 2
Evaluating the Safety and Immunogenicity of MTBVAC
HIV I Infection, Tuberculosis
Active, not recruiting
Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Mobile HIV Prevention App to Increase HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) Testing and PrEP Initiation Among Rural Men Who Have Sex With Men
HIV Infections, STI
Not yet recruiting
PNF RCT to Decrease Alcohol Use and Increase HIV Prevention
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), Alcohol Misuse
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Danny J Schust, M.D. principal investigator
University of Missouri-Columbia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Truvada in people with HIV and Infertility, run by University of Missouri-Columbia at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 24 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of women remaining HIV-seronegative for 6 months after a treatment menstrual cycle (time frame: 6 months after each menstrual cycle in which HIV-discordant couple has one act of unprotected intercourse). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02572505, which also lists 23 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2017.