AzTrials
AzTrials

Infant, Very Low Birth WeightNCT02573779

Growth and Microbiome Development in Very Low Birth Weight Infants Fed Primarily Mother's Own Milk vs. Donor Human Milk

An observational study of Infant, Very Low Birth Weight, run by Baylor College of Medicine at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A study to compare growth, development of the intestinal bacterial environment, and other short term outcomes in groups of babies fed primarily their own mother's milk compared to those who receive primarily donor human milk. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 3 days
Conditions the study is for
Infant, Very Low Birth Weight
How many people
125 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
10 Jul 2015to 25 Oct 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 3 days
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: Newborn infants less than 1500 g birth weight who are fed primarily either mother's own milk or donor human milk.

Who may be able to join

  • Infants less than 72 hours old and less than 1500 g birth weight, who have reasonable expectation of survival and can adhere to a feeding protocol involving mother's own milk and/or donor milk that will include fortification using Prolacta and potentially human cream.

Who cannot join

  • Exclusion criteria will include birth weight greater than 1500 g, age > 72 hours old, major congenital anomalies, clinically significant heart disease, abdominal wall defects and/or intestinal atresias, severe perinatal hypoxia, or otherwise less than reasonable expectation of survival through the study period.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Baylor College of Medicine / Texas Children's Hospital

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Texas Children's Hospital

    Houston, Texas, 77030

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Intestinal Microbiota and Short Term Outcomes in Very Low Birth Weight Infants Fed Primarily Donor Human Milk Compared to Infants Fed Primarily Mother's Own Milk

A study to compare growth, development of the intestinal bacterial environment, and other short term outcomes in groups of babies fed primarily their own mother's milk compared to those who receive primarily donor human milk. The investigators hypothesize that infants who receive primarily their own mother's milk will have better growth, a more diverse intestinal bacterial environment, and possibly some improved short term outcomes such as better feeding tolerance and lower rates of infection.

Read the detailed description

Background: Human milk feeding provides numerous benefits to preterm infants due to improvements in gastrointestinal maturation, host defense, infection rates, and improved long-term outcomes in neurodevelopment as well as cardiovascular and metabolic disease. There is accumulating evidence that an exclusive human milk-based diet decreases the rates of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and death, and is associated with better feeding tolerance in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants than a diet of bovine milk-based products. In order to provide VLBW infants the benefits afforded by human milk feeding, the use of donor milk (DM) in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) has increased as many mothers are unable to provide sufficient milk needed for their premature infants. While there have been numerous studies that have favorably compared feeding of mother's own milk (MOM) to formula as well as studies that compare DM to formula, there are relatively few that compare maternal milk to donor milk.

In regard to feeding tolerance and infection prevention, it has been proposed that DM may be less beneficial than MOM due to reduction in biologically active components during pasteurization, including human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) and other immunological factors, growth factors, and hormones. Finally, alterations in the intestinal microbiota of preterm infants are suspected to contribute to disease states such as NEC, specifically within infants who have decreased microbial diversity. To the investigators knowledge, no studies comparing the intestinal microbiota among infants fed primarily MOM versus those fed primarily DM have been published.

Purpose: To compare growth velocities, time to reach full enteral feeding volume, intestinal microbiota, and short term outcomes (NEC, late-onset sepsis, white matter injury) between infants fed primarily mother's own milk versus pasteurized donor human milk.

Hypothesis: Infants fed primarily (50% or greater) mother's own milk will have increased intestinal microbiome diversity compared to infants fed primarily pasteurized donor human milk.

Design: This prospective cohort study will be conducted in the Level III NICU at Texas Children's Hospital - Pavilion for Women and the Level II NICU at Texas Children's Hospital -- West Tower. Infants less than 1500 g birth weight will be fed exclusively human milk (mother's milk and or donor breast milk) fortified with donor human milk-derived fortifier per the investigators hospital guidelines. Once enteral feeding is established, infants will be categorized into cohorts based on percentage of feeding volume consisting of mother's own milk, including broad categorization of greater than 50% maternal milk versus less than 50%, and possibly tiered analysis of infants who receive less 25% maternal milk, 25-75% maternal milk, and greater than 75% maternal milk.

An enrollment goal of greater than 125 infants including twins and multiples will be targeted for adequate sample size.

Procedure: Infants will be enrolled within 72 hours of birth and started on parenteral nutrition and enteral human milk feedings per standardized feeding protocols and discretion of the attending neonatologist on service. Decisions to decrease or discontinue enteral feedings due to medical instability will be made by the attending neonatologist. Infants will be preferentially fed their own mothers' milk when available. For mothers who are unable to express adequate milk volume for their infants, pooled, pasteurized donor human milk will be offered per established NICU protocol. Feeds will be supplemented with human-milk based fortifier per protocol.

At time of initial consent for the study, mothers will also be asked for consent to obtain a small sample (0.2-0.5 mL) of colostrum or expressed milk produced in the first week of life, as well as weekly milk samples thereafter, in order to analyze bacterial content of milk as it compares to the developing infant microbiome. However, consent for milk collection is not required for the infant's participation in the study. For infants who receive primarily donor milk, weekly samples of the milk they receive may similarly be analyzed for bacterial content.

Infant stool samples will be collected during the first week of life and then at weekly intervals for six weeks for research purposes. The samples will be analyzed via 16S rRNA sequencing to determine diversity of intestinal microbiota. Additional analysis for metabolomics will be considered if lab availability and cost allows.

Once weekly, a research nurse or physician will document growth measurements, including weight, length, and head circumference. Outcome data from the infants' medical records will be recorded, including time to regain birth weight, feeding tolerance as indicated by time required to reach full enteral feeding volumes of 100 ml/kg/day (for hydration) and 130-160 ml/kg/day (final goal volume for nutrition), and rates of NEC, spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP), late-onset sepsis, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). As all preterm infants less than 1000 g birth weight born at TCH-PFW have routinely performed brain MRIs at term gestation or hospital discharge, enrolled infants who fall into this subgroup will have their MRI results reviewed for outcome analysis.

Additional medical record data for collection will include mechanism of delivery (cesarean vs. vaginal), antibiotics received by mother during 2nd and 3rd trimester as well as at time of delivery and while nursing/expressing milk, antibiotics received by baby during hospitalization, length of hospitalization, postmenstrual age at discharge, days NPO, days of parenteral nutrition, percentage of patients with patent ductus arteriosus, and rates of intraventricular hemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity, and death.

Although there is no long-term follow up currently designed for this study, at time of initial enrollment there will be an optional consent to allow study personnel to access medical records for patients who go on to have neurodevelopmental follow up visits at clinics within the investigators institution. There will also be optional consent for families to be contacted when the infant is approximately 6, 12, 18, and 24 months for developmental follow up. This will allow for possible comparison of neurodevelopmental outcomes at approximately 18-24 months in the subgroup of patients whose mothers consent to these aspects of the study.

No labs will be requested for research purposes. No interventions are part of this protocol.

Being tested
Observational - no intervention
Keywords
human milk, enteral nutrition, microbiome, microbiota

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Observational - no interventionOther

    This study will observe cohorts of infants who are fed primarily either their own mother's milk or donor milk as part of their routine care. No direct intervention is performed as part of the study.

Study groups in NCT02573779
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Infants fed mother's own milkInfants fed >50% mother's own milk with enteral feeding.
Receives: Other: Observational - no intervention
Donor milk fed infantsInfants fed <50% mother's own milk (and thus >50% donor human milk) with enteral feeding.
Receives: Other: Observational - no intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Intestinal Microbiome Diversity

    Stool samples during the first 6 weeks of life will be analyzed to compare development of microbial diversity

    Measured: 6 weeks

  2. Hospital Length of Stay

    Hospital length of stay will be calculated from birth to discharge of infant.

    Measured: Birth to discharge

  3. Weight Gain

    Weight gain will be evaluated weekly throughout the study (defined as g/kg/day)

    Measured: 6-10 weeks

  4. Linear Growth

    Linear growth will be measured weekly (defined as cm/week)

    Measured: 6-10 weeks

  5. Head Circumference Growth

    Growth in head circumference will be measured weekly (defined as cm/wk)

    Measured: 6-10 weeks

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Days to Final Enteral Feed Volume

    Number of days for infant to reach full enteral feeds.

    Measured: 6-10 weeks

  2. Rates of Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC)

    the number of patients with a diagnosis of NEC (Stage ≥ IIA) will be collected

    Measured: 6-10 weeks

  3. Rates of Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation (SIP)

    the number of patients who develop a spontaneous intestinal perforation will be collected

    Measured: 6-10 weeks

  4. Rates of Late-onset Sepsis

    the number of patients with late-onset sepsis will be collected

    Measured: 6-10 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Oct 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start10 Jul 2015
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2016
  4. Study completion25 Oct 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
125 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02573779
Sponsor's protocol ID
H-36828
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
8 Oct 2015
Last updated
25 Feb 2025
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Schanler RJ. Outcomes of human milk-fed premature infants. Semin Perinatol. 2011 Feb;35(1):29-33. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.10.005.

    PubMed 21255704
  • Sullivan S, Schanler RJ, Kim JH, Patel AL, Trawoger R, Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, Chan GM, Blanco CL, Abrams S, Cotten CM, Laroia N, Ehrenkranz RA, Dudell G, Cristofalo EA, Meier P, Lee ML, Rechtman DJ, Lucas A. An exclusively human milk-based diet is associated with a lower rate of necrotizing enterocolitis than a diet of human milk and bovine milk-based products. J Pediatr. 2010 Apr;156(4):562-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.10.040. Epub 2009 Dec 29.

    PubMed 20036378
  • Cristofalo EA, Schanler RJ, Blanco CL, Sullivan S, Trawoeger R, Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, Dudell G, Rechtman DJ, Lee ML, Lucas A, Abrams S. Randomized trial of exclusive human milk versus preterm formula diets in extremely premature infants. J Pediatr. 2013 Dec;163(6):1592-1595.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.07.011. Epub 2013 Aug 20.

    PubMed 23968744
  • Abrams SA, Schanler RJ, Lee ML, Rechtman DJ. Greater mortality and morbidity in extremely preterm infants fed a diet containing cow milk protein products. Breastfeed Med. 2014 Jul-Aug;9(6):281-5. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2014.0024. Epub 2014 May 27.

    PubMed 24867268
  • Sisk PM, Lovelady CA, Gruber KJ, Dillard RG, O'Shea TM. Human milk consumption and full enteral feeding among infants who weigh </= 1250 grams. Pediatrics. 2008 Jun;121(6):e1528-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2110.

    PubMed 18519456
  • Schanler RJ, Shulman RJ, Lau C. Feeding strategies for premature infants: beneficial outcomes of feeding fortified human milk versus preterm formula. Pediatrics. 1999 Jun;103(6 Pt 1):1150-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.6.1150.

    PubMed 10353922
  • Section on Breastfeeding. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2012 Mar;129(3):e827-41. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3552. Epub 2012 Feb 27.

    PubMed 22371471
  • Schanler RJ. Mother's own milk, donor human milk, and preterm formulas in the feeding of extremely premature infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007 Dec;45 Suppl 3:S175-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000302967.83244.36.

    PubMed 18185087
  • Hair AB, Hawthorne KM, Chetta KE, Abrams SA. Human milk feeding supports adequate growth in infants </= 1250 grams birth weight. BMC Res Notes. 2013 Nov 13;6:459. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-459.

    PubMed 24220185
  • Hair AB, Blanco CL, Moreira AG, Hawthorne KM, Lee ML, Rechtman DJ, Abrams SA. Randomized trial of human milk cream as a supplement to standard fortification of an exclusive human milk-based diet in infants 750-1250 g birth weight. J Pediatr. 2014 Nov;165(5):915-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.07.005. Epub 2014 Aug 15.

    PubMed 25130571
  • Dewey KG, Heinig MJ, Nommsen-Rivers LA. Differences in morbidity between breast-fed and formula-fed infants. J Pediatr. 1995 May;126(5 Pt 1):696-702. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70395-0.

    PubMed 7751991
  • Le Huerou-Luron I, Blat S, Boudry G. Breast- v. formula-feeding: impacts on the digestive tract and immediate and long-term health effects. Nutr Res Rev. 2010 Jun;23(1):23-36. doi: 10.1017/S0954422410000065. Epub 2010 May 10.

    PubMed 20450531
  • Duijts L, Ramadhani MK, Moll HA. Breastfeeding protects against infectious diseases during infancy in industrialized countries. A systematic review. Matern Child Nutr. 2009 Jul;5(3):199-210. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2008.00176.x.

    PubMed 19531047
  • ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition; Arslanoglu S, Corpeleijn W, Moro G, Braegger C, Campoy C, Colomb V, Decsi T, Domellof M, Fewtrell M, Hojsak I, Mihatsch W, Molgaard C, Shamir R, Turck D, van Goudoever J. Donor human milk for preterm infants: current evidence and research directions. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013 Oct;57(4):535-42. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182a3af0a.

    PubMed 24084373
  • Bertino E, Giuliani F, Baricco M, Di Nicola P, Peila C, Vassia C, Chiale F, Pirra A, Cresi F, Martano C, Coscia A. Benefits of donor milk in the feeding of preterm infants. Early Hum Dev. 2013 Oct;89 Suppl 2:S3-6. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.07.008. Epub 2013 Aug 6.

    PubMed 23932110

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Infant, Very Low Birth Weight, run by Baylor College of Medicine at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Apr 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intestinal Microbiome Diversity (time frame: 6 weeks). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02573779, which also lists 29 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Feb 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in