Infant, Very Low Birth WeightNCT02573779
Growth and Microbiome Development in Very Low Birth Weight Infants Fed Primarily Mother's Own Milk vs. Donor Human Milk
An observational study of Infant, Very Low Birth Weight, run by Baylor College of Medicine at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
A study to compare growth, development of the intestinal bacterial environment, and other short term outcomes in groups of babies fed primarily their own mother's milk compared to those who receive primarily donor human milk. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 3 days
- Conditions the study is for
- Infant, Very Low Birth Weight
- How many people
- 125 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 10 Jul 2015to 25 Oct 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 3 days
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Study population: Newborn infants less than 1500 g birth weight who are fed primarily either mother's own milk or donor human milk.
Who may be able to join
- Infants less than 72 hours old and less than 1500 g birth weight, who have reasonable expectation of survival and can adhere to a feeding protocol involving mother's own milk and/or donor milk that will include fortification using Prolacta and potentially human cream.
Who cannot join
- Exclusion criteria will include birth weight greater than 1500 g, age > 72 hours old, major congenital anomalies, clinically significant heart disease, abdominal wall defects and/or intestinal atresias, severe perinatal hypoxia, or otherwise less than reasonable expectation of survival through the study period.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Baylor College of Medicine / Texas Children's Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030
Texas Children's Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030
About this study
Official title: Intestinal Microbiota and Short Term Outcomes in Very Low Birth Weight Infants Fed Primarily Donor Human Milk Compared to Infants Fed Primarily Mother's Own Milk
A study to compare growth, development of the intestinal bacterial environment, and other short term outcomes in groups of babies fed primarily their own mother's milk compared to those who receive primarily donor human milk. The investigators hypothesize that infants who receive primarily their own mother's milk will have better growth, a more diverse intestinal bacterial environment, and possibly some improved short term outcomes such as better feeding tolerance and lower rates of infection.
Read the detailed description
Background: Human milk feeding provides numerous benefits to preterm infants due to improvements in gastrointestinal maturation, host defense, infection rates, and improved long-term outcomes in neurodevelopment as well as cardiovascular and metabolic disease. There is accumulating evidence that an exclusive human milk-based diet decreases the rates of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and death, and is associated with better feeding tolerance in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants than a diet of bovine milk-based products. In order to provide VLBW infants the benefits afforded by human milk feeding, the use of donor milk (DM) in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) has increased as many mothers are unable to provide sufficient milk needed for their premature infants. While there have been numerous studies that have favorably compared feeding of mother's own milk (MOM) to formula as well as studies that compare DM to formula, there are relatively few that compare maternal milk to donor milk.
In regard to feeding tolerance and infection prevention, it has been proposed that DM may be less beneficial than MOM due to reduction in biologically active components during pasteurization, including human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) and other immunological factors, growth factors, and hormones. Finally, alterations in the intestinal microbiota of preterm infants are suspected to contribute to disease states such as NEC, specifically within infants who have decreased microbial diversity. To the investigators knowledge, no studies comparing the intestinal microbiota among infants fed primarily MOM versus those fed primarily DM have been published.
Purpose: To compare growth velocities, time to reach full enteral feeding volume, intestinal microbiota, and short term outcomes (NEC, late-onset sepsis, white matter injury) between infants fed primarily mother's own milk versus pasteurized donor human milk.
Hypothesis: Infants fed primarily (50% or greater) mother's own milk will have increased intestinal microbiome diversity compared to infants fed primarily pasteurized donor human milk.
Design: This prospective cohort study will be conducted in the Level III NICU at Texas Children's Hospital - Pavilion for Women and the Level II NICU at Texas Children's Hospital -- West Tower. Infants less than 1500 g birth weight will be fed exclusively human milk (mother's milk and or donor breast milk) fortified with donor human milk-derived fortifier per the investigators hospital guidelines. Once enteral feeding is established, infants will be categorized into cohorts based on percentage of feeding volume consisting of mother's own milk, including broad categorization of greater than 50% maternal milk versus less than 50%, and possibly tiered analysis of infants who receive less 25% maternal milk, 25-75% maternal milk, and greater than 75% maternal milk.
An enrollment goal of greater than 125 infants including twins and multiples will be targeted for adequate sample size.
Procedure: Infants will be enrolled within 72 hours of birth and started on parenteral nutrition and enteral human milk feedings per standardized feeding protocols and discretion of the attending neonatologist on service. Decisions to decrease or discontinue enteral feedings due to medical instability will be made by the attending neonatologist. Infants will be preferentially fed their own mothers' milk when available. For mothers who are unable to express adequate milk volume for their infants, pooled, pasteurized donor human milk will be offered per established NICU protocol. Feeds will be supplemented with human-milk based fortifier per protocol.
At time of initial consent for the study, mothers will also be asked for consent to obtain a small sample (0.2-0.5 mL) of colostrum or expressed milk produced in the first week of life, as well as weekly milk samples thereafter, in order to analyze bacterial content of milk as it compares to the developing infant microbiome. However, consent for milk collection is not required for the infant's participation in the study. For infants who receive primarily donor milk, weekly samples of the milk they receive may similarly be analyzed for bacterial content.
Infant stool samples will be collected during the first week of life and then at weekly intervals for six weeks for research purposes. The samples will be analyzed via 16S rRNA sequencing to determine diversity of intestinal microbiota. Additional analysis for metabolomics will be considered if lab availability and cost allows.
Once weekly, a research nurse or physician will document growth measurements, including weight, length, and head circumference. Outcome data from the infants' medical records will be recorded, including time to regain birth weight, feeding tolerance as indicated by time required to reach full enteral feeding volumes of 100 ml/kg/day (for hydration) and 130-160 ml/kg/day (final goal volume for nutrition), and rates of NEC, spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP), late-onset sepsis, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). As all preterm infants less than 1000 g birth weight born at TCH-PFW have routinely performed brain MRIs at term gestation or hospital discharge, enrolled infants who fall into this subgroup will have their MRI results reviewed for outcome analysis.
Additional medical record data for collection will include mechanism of delivery (cesarean vs. vaginal), antibiotics received by mother during 2nd and 3rd trimester as well as at time of delivery and while nursing/expressing milk, antibiotics received by baby during hospitalization, length of hospitalization, postmenstrual age at discharge, days NPO, days of parenteral nutrition, percentage of patients with patent ductus arteriosus, and rates of intraventricular hemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity, and death.
Although there is no long-term follow up currently designed for this study, at time of initial enrollment there will be an optional consent to allow study personnel to access medical records for patients who go on to have neurodevelopmental follow up visits at clinics within the investigators institution. There will also be optional consent for families to be contacted when the infant is approximately 6, 12, 18, and 24 months for developmental follow up. This will allow for possible comparison of neurodevelopmental outcomes at approximately 18-24 months in the subgroup of patients whose mothers consent to these aspects of the study.
No labs will be requested for research purposes. No interventions are part of this protocol.
- Conditions
- Infant, Very Low Birth Weight
- Being tested
- Observational - no intervention
- Keywords
- human milk, enteral nutrition, microbiome, microbiota
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Observational - no interventionOther
This study will observe cohorts of infants who are fed primarily either their own mother's milk or donor milk as part of their routine care. No direct intervention is performed as part of the study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Infants fed mother's own milk | Infants fed >50% mother's own milk with enteral feeding. Receives: Other: Observational - no intervention | |
| Donor milk fed infants | Infants fed <50% mother's own milk (and thus >50% donor human milk) with enteral feeding. Receives: Other: Observational - no intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Intestinal Microbiome Diversity
Stool samples during the first 6 weeks of life will be analyzed to compare development of microbial diversity
Measured: 6 weeks
Hospital Length of Stay
Hospital length of stay will be calculated from birth to discharge of infant.
Measured: Birth to discharge
Weight Gain
Weight gain will be evaluated weekly throughout the study (defined as g/kg/day)
Measured: 6-10 weeks
Linear Growth
Linear growth will be measured weekly (defined as cm/week)
Measured: 6-10 weeks
Head Circumference Growth
Growth in head circumference will be measured weekly (defined as cm/wk)
Measured: 6-10 weeks
Secondary outcomes (4)
Days to Final Enteral Feed Volume
Number of days for infant to reach full enteral feeds.
Measured: 6-10 weeks
Rates of Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC)
the number of patients with a diagnosis of NEC (Stage ≥ IIA) will be collected
Measured: 6-10 weeks
Rates of Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation (SIP)
the number of patients who develop a spontaneous intestinal perforation will be collected
Measured: 6-10 weeks
Rates of Late-onset Sepsis
the number of patients with late-onset sepsis will be collected
Measured: 6-10 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Study start10 Jul 2015
- Primary completion30 Sep 2016
- Study completion25 Oct 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (29)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Infant, Very Low Birth WeightStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Baylor College of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 125 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Baylor College of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Amy Hair, Baylor College of Medicine
- Investigators
- Amy Hair, MD, Principal investigator, Baylor College of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02573779
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-36828
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 8 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 25 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Schanler RJ. Outcomes of human milk-fed premature infants. Semin Perinatol. 2011 Feb;35(1):29-33. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.10.005.
PubMed 21255704Sullivan S, Schanler RJ, Kim JH, Patel AL, Trawoger R, Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, Chan GM, Blanco CL, Abrams S, Cotten CM, Laroia N, Ehrenkranz RA, Dudell G, Cristofalo EA, Meier P, Lee ML, Rechtman DJ, Lucas A. An exclusively human milk-based diet is associated with a lower rate of necrotizing enterocolitis than a diet of human milk and bovine milk-based products. J Pediatr. 2010 Apr;156(4):562-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.10.040. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
PubMed 20036378Cristofalo EA, Schanler RJ, Blanco CL, Sullivan S, Trawoeger R, Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, Dudell G, Rechtman DJ, Lee ML, Lucas A, Abrams S. Randomized trial of exclusive human milk versus preterm formula diets in extremely premature infants. J Pediatr. 2013 Dec;163(6):1592-1595.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.07.011. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
PubMed 23968744Abrams SA, Schanler RJ, Lee ML, Rechtman DJ. Greater mortality and morbidity in extremely preterm infants fed a diet containing cow milk protein products. Breastfeed Med. 2014 Jul-Aug;9(6):281-5. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2014.0024. Epub 2014 May 27.
PubMed 24867268Sisk PM, Lovelady CA, Gruber KJ, Dillard RG, O'Shea TM. Human milk consumption and full enteral feeding among infants who weigh </= 1250 grams. Pediatrics. 2008 Jun;121(6):e1528-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2110.
PubMed 18519456Schanler RJ, Shulman RJ, Lau C. Feeding strategies for premature infants: beneficial outcomes of feeding fortified human milk versus preterm formula. Pediatrics. 1999 Jun;103(6 Pt 1):1150-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.6.1150.
PubMed 10353922Section on Breastfeeding. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2012 Mar;129(3):e827-41. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3552. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
PubMed 22371471Schanler RJ. Mother's own milk, donor human milk, and preterm formulas in the feeding of extremely premature infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007 Dec;45 Suppl 3:S175-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000302967.83244.36.
PubMed 18185087Hair AB, Hawthorne KM, Chetta KE, Abrams SA. Human milk feeding supports adequate growth in infants </= 1250 grams birth weight. BMC Res Notes. 2013 Nov 13;6:459. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-459.
PubMed 24220185Hair AB, Blanco CL, Moreira AG, Hawthorne KM, Lee ML, Rechtman DJ, Abrams SA. Randomized trial of human milk cream as a supplement to standard fortification of an exclusive human milk-based diet in infants 750-1250 g birth weight. J Pediatr. 2014 Nov;165(5):915-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.07.005. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
PubMed 25130571Dewey KG, Heinig MJ, Nommsen-Rivers LA. Differences in morbidity between breast-fed and formula-fed infants. J Pediatr. 1995 May;126(5 Pt 1):696-702. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70395-0.
PubMed 7751991Le Huerou-Luron I, Blat S, Boudry G. Breast- v. formula-feeding: impacts on the digestive tract and immediate and long-term health effects. Nutr Res Rev. 2010 Jun;23(1):23-36. doi: 10.1017/S0954422410000065. Epub 2010 May 10.
PubMed 20450531Duijts L, Ramadhani MK, Moll HA. Breastfeeding protects against infectious diseases during infancy in industrialized countries. A systematic review. Matern Child Nutr. 2009 Jul;5(3):199-210. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2008.00176.x.
PubMed 19531047ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition; Arslanoglu S, Corpeleijn W, Moro G, Braegger C, Campoy C, Colomb V, Decsi T, Domellof M, Fewtrell M, Hojsak I, Mihatsch W, Molgaard C, Shamir R, Turck D, van Goudoever J. Donor human milk for preterm infants: current evidence and research directions. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013 Oct;57(4):535-42. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182a3af0a.
PubMed 24084373Bertino E, Giuliani F, Baricco M, Di Nicola P, Peila C, Vassia C, Chiale F, Pirra A, Cresi F, Martano C, Coscia A. Benefits of donor milk in the feeding of preterm infants. Early Hum Dev. 2013 Oct;89 Suppl 2:S3-6. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.07.008. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
PubMed 23932110
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intestinal Microbiota and Short Term Outcomes in Very Low Birth Weight Infants Fed Primarily Donor Human Milk Compared to Infants Fed Primarily Mother's Own Milk
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02573779
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H-36828
- Conditions
- Infant, Very Low Birth Weight
- Keywords
- human milk, enteral nutrition, microbiome, microbiota
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 125 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Baylor College of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Jul 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Oct 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 29 Apr 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A study to compare growth, development of the intestinal bacterial environment, and other short term outcomes in groups of babies fed primarily their own mother's milk compared to those who receive primarily donor human milk. The investigators hypothesize that infants who receive primarily their own mother's milk will have better growth, a more diverse intestinal bacterial environment, and possibly some improved short term outcomes such as better feeding tolerance and lower rates of infection.
Detailed description
Background: Human milk feeding provides numerous benefits to preterm infants due to improvements in gastrointestinal maturation, host defense, infection rates, and improved long-term outcomes in neurodevelopment as well as cardiovascular and metabolic disease. There is accumulating evidence that an exclusive human milk-based diet decreases the rates of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and death, and is associated with better feeding tolerance in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants than a diet of bovine milk-based products. In order to provide VLBW infants the benefits afforded by human milk feeding, the use of donor milk (DM) in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) has increased as many mothers are unable to provide sufficient milk needed for their premature infants. While there have been numerous studies that have favorably compared feeding of mother's own milk (MOM) to formula as well as studies that compare DM to formula, there are relatively few that compare maternal milk to donor milk.
In regard to feeding tolerance and infection prevention, it has been proposed that DM may be less beneficial than MOM due to reduction in biologically active components during pasteurization, including human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) and other immunological factors, growth factors, and hormones. Finally, alterations in the intestinal microbiota of preterm infants are suspected to contribute to disease states such as NEC, specifically within infants who have decreased microbial diversity. To the investigators knowledge, no studies comparing the intestinal microbiota among infants fed primarily MOM versus those fed primarily DM have been published.
Purpose: To compare growth velocities, time to reach full enteral feeding volume, intestinal microbiota, and short term outcomes (NEC, late-onset sepsis, white matter injury) between infants fed primarily mother's own milk versus pasteurized donor human milk.
Hypothesis: Infants fed primarily (50% or greater) mother's own milk will have increased intestinal microbiome diversity compared to infants fed primarily pasteurized donor human milk.
Design: This prospective cohort study will be conducted in the Level III NICU at Texas Children's Hospital - Pavilion for Women and the Level II NICU at Texas Children's Hospital -- West Tower. Infants less than 1500 g birth weight will be fed exclusively human milk (mother's milk and or donor breast milk) fortified with donor human milk-derived fortifier per the investigators hospital guidelines. Once enteral feeding is established, infants will be categorized into cohorts based on percentage of feeding volume consisting of mother's own milk, including broad categorization of greater than 50% maternal milk versus less than 50%, and possibly tiered analysis of infants who receive less 25% maternal milk, 25-75% maternal milk, and greater than 75% maternal milk.
An enrollment goal of greater than 125 infants including twins and multiples will be targeted for adequate sample size.
Procedure: Infants will be enrolled within 72 hours of birth and started on parenteral nutrition and enteral human milk feedings per standardized feeding protocols and discretion of the attending neonatologist on service. Decisions to decrease or discontinue enteral feedings due to medical instability will be made by the attending neonatologist. Infants will be preferentially fed their own mothers' milk when available. For mothers who are unable to express adequate milk volume for their infants, pooled, pasteurized donor human milk will be offered per established NICU protocol. Feeds will be supplemented with human-milk based fortifier per protocol.
At time of initial consent for the study, mothers will also be asked for consent to obtain a small sample (0.2-0.5 mL) of colostrum or expressed milk produced in the first week of life, as well as weekly milk samples thereafter, in order to analyze bacterial content of milk as it compares to the developing infant microbiome. However, consent for milk collection is not required for the infant's participation in the study. For infants who receive primarily donor milk, weekly samples of the milk they receive may similarly be analyzed for bacterial content.
Infant stool samples will be collected during the first week of life and then at weekly intervals for six weeks for research purposes. The samples will be analyzed via 16S rRNA sequencing to determine diversity of intestinal microbiota. Additional analysis for metabolomics will be considered if lab availability and cost allows.
Once weekly, a research nurse or physician will document growth measurements, including weight, length, and head circumference. Outcome data from the infants' medical records will be recorded, including time to regain birth weight, feeding tolerance as indicated by time required to reach full enteral feeding volumes of 100 ml/kg/day (for hydration) and 130-160 ml/kg/day (final goal volume for nutrition), and rates of NEC, spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP), late-onset sepsis, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). As all preterm infants less than 1000 g birth weight born at TCH-PFW have routinely performed brain MRIs at term gestation or hospital discharge, enrolled infants who fall into this subgroup will have their MRI results reviewed for outcome analysis.
Additional medical record data for collection will include mechanism of delivery (cesarean vs. vaginal), antibiotics received by mother during 2nd and 3rd trimester as well as at time of delivery and while nursing/expressing milk, antibiotics received by baby during hospitalization, length of hospitalization, postmenstrual age at discharge, days NPO, days of parenteral nutrition, percentage of patients with patent ductus arteriosus, and rates of intraventricular hemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity, and death.
Although there is no long-term follow up currently designed for this study, at time of initial enrollment there will be an optional consent to allow study personnel to access medical records for patients who go on to have neurodevelopmental follow up visits at clinics within the investigators institution. There will also be optional consent for families to be contacted when the infant is approximately 6, 12, 18, and 24 months for developmental follow up. This will allow for possible comparison of neurodevelopmental outcomes at approximately 18-24 months in the subgroup of patients whose mothers consent to these aspects of the study.
No labs will be requested for research purposes. No interventions are part of this protocol.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Infants fed mother's own milk | – | Other: Observational - no interventionInfants fed >50% mother's own milk with enteral feeding. |
| Donor milk fed infants | – | Other: Observational - no interventionInfants fed <50% mother's own milk (and thus >50% donor human milk) with enteral feeding. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 3 days
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- Newborn infants less than 1500 g birth weight who are fed primarily either mother's own milk or donor human milk.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Infants less than 72 hours old and less than 1500 g birth weight, who have reasonable expectation of survival and can adhere to a feeding protocol involving mother's own milk and/or donor milk that will include fortification using Prolacta and potentially human cream.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Exclusion criteria will include birth weight greater than 1500 g, age > 72 hours old, major congenital anomalies, clinically significant heart disease, abdominal wall defects and/or intestinal atresias, severe perinatal hypoxia, or otherwise less than reasonable expectation of survival through the study period.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Observational - no interventionThis study will observe cohorts of infants who are fed primarily either their own mother's milk or donor milk as part of their routine care. No direct intervention is performed as part of the study. | Other | Donor milk fed infants, Infants fed mother's own milk |
Primary outcome
Intestinal Microbiome Diversity
Time frame: 6 weeks
Stool samples during the first 6 weeks of life will be analyzed to compare development of microbial diversity
Hospital Length of Stay
Time frame: Birth to discharge
Hospital length of stay will be calculated from birth to discharge of infant.
Weight Gain
Time frame: 6-10 weeks
Weight gain will be evaluated weekly throughout the study (defined as g/kg/day)
Linear Growth
Time frame: 6-10 weeks
Linear growth will be measured weekly (defined as cm/week)
Head Circumference Growth
Time frame: 6-10 weeks
Growth in head circumference will be measured weekly (defined as cm/wk)
4 secondary outcomes
Days to Final Enteral Feed Volume
Time frame: 6-10 weeks
Rates of Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC)
Time frame: 6-10 weeks
Rates of Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation (SIP)
Time frame: 6-10 weeks
Rates of Late-onset Sepsis
Time frame: 6-10 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Feb 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 21255704Schanler RJ. Outcomes of human milk-fed premature infants. Semin Perinatol. 2011 Feb;35(1):29-33. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.10.005.
- Background: PubMed 20036378Sullivan S, Schanler RJ, Kim JH, Patel AL, Trawoger R, Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, Chan GM, Blanco CL, Abrams S, Cotten CM, Laroia N, Ehrenkranz RA, Dudell G, Cristofalo EA, Meier P, Lee ML, Rechtman DJ, Lucas A. An exclusively human milk-based diet is associated with a lower rate of necrotizing enterocolitis than a diet of human milk and bovine milk-based products. J Pediatr. 2010 Apr;156(4):562-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.10.040. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
- Background: PubMed 23968744Cristofalo EA, Schanler RJ, Blanco CL, Sullivan S, Trawoeger R, Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, Dudell G, Rechtman DJ, Lee ML, Lucas A, Abrams S. Randomized trial of exclusive human milk versus preterm formula diets in extremely premature infants. J Pediatr. 2013 Dec;163(6):1592-1595.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.07.011. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
- Background: PubMed 24867268Abrams SA, Schanler RJ, Lee ML, Rechtman DJ. Greater mortality and morbidity in extremely preterm infants fed a diet containing cow milk protein products. Breastfeed Med. 2014 Jul-Aug;9(6):281-5. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2014.0024. Epub 2014 May 27.
- Background: PubMed 18519456Sisk PM, Lovelady CA, Gruber KJ, Dillard RG, O'Shea TM. Human milk consumption and full enteral feeding among infants who weigh </= 1250 grams. Pediatrics. 2008 Jun;121(6):e1528-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2110.
- Background: PubMed 10353922Schanler RJ, Shulman RJ, Lau C. Feeding strategies for premature infants: beneficial outcomes of feeding fortified human milk versus preterm formula. Pediatrics. 1999 Jun;103(6 Pt 1):1150-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.6.1150.
- Background: PubMed 22371471Section on Breastfeeding. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2012 Mar;129(3):e827-41. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3552. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
- Background: PubMed 18185087Schanler RJ. Mother's own milk, donor human milk, and preterm formulas in the feeding of extremely premature infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007 Dec;45 Suppl 3:S175-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000302967.83244.36.
- Background: PubMed 24220185Hair AB, Hawthorne KM, Chetta KE, Abrams SA. Human milk feeding supports adequate growth in infants </= 1250 grams birth weight. BMC Res Notes. 2013 Nov 13;6:459. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-459.
- Background: PubMed 25130571Hair AB, Blanco CL, Moreira AG, Hawthorne KM, Lee ML, Rechtman DJ, Abrams SA. Randomized trial of human milk cream as a supplement to standard fortification of an exclusive human milk-based diet in infants 750-1250 g birth weight. J Pediatr. 2014 Nov;165(5):915-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.07.005. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
- Background: PubMed 7751991Dewey KG, Heinig MJ, Nommsen-Rivers LA. Differences in morbidity between breast-fed and formula-fed infants. J Pediatr. 1995 May;126(5 Pt 1):696-702. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70395-0.
- Background: PubMed 20450531Le Huerou-Luron I, Blat S, Boudry G. Breast- v. formula-feeding: impacts on the digestive tract and immediate and long-term health effects. Nutr Res Rev. 2010 Jun;23(1):23-36. doi: 10.1017/S0954422410000065. Epub 2010 May 10.
Related trials for Infant, Very Low Birth Weight
Recruiting
Effect of Developmental Care on Very Low Birth Weight Infants
Intervention
Active, not recruiting
30% or 60% Oxygen at Birth to Improve Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Very Low Birthweight Infants
Premature Infant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant
RecruitingPhase 1
Gut Permeability and Microbiome in Preterm Infants
Prematurity Complications
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Predictors of Postnatal Growth Failure in Preterm Infants
Premature Birth, Growth Failure
Recruiting
Donor Breast Milk 2
Iron Deficiency Anemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amy Hair, MD principal investigator
Baylor College of Medicine
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Infant, Very Low Birth Weight, run by Baylor College of Medicine at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Apr 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Intestinal Microbiome Diversity (time frame: 6 weeks). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02573779, which also lists 29 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Feb 2025.