ResuscitationREDEEDNCT02575573
Resuscitation Decisions in the Emergency Department (ED)
An observational study of Resuscitation, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
The investigators will retrospectively examine the connection between resuscitation decisions of admitted patients at the ED of the University Hospital of Basel and several demographic and health related measures. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Resuscitation
- What is being tested?
- Factors influencing resuscitation decisions of patients and Factors leading to not asking patients about resuscitation preference
- How many people
- 10,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- Oct 2015to Dec 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Admitted patients from the Emergency Department of the University Hospital of Basel between the 1st of January 2010 and the 31st of December 2014.
Who may be able to join
- Patients admitted to the emergency department (duration of hospitalisation more than 24 h).
- Patients with a research consent "yes".
Who cannot join
- Patients being discharged within less than 24 hours.
- Patients with a research consent "no".
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Switzerland1 site
University Hospital Basel, Emergency Department
Basel, Canton of Basel-City, 4031
About this study
Official title: Influencing Factors on Resuscitation Decisions in the ED
The investigators will retrospectively examine the connection between resuscitation decisions of admitted patients at the ED of the University Hospital of Basel and several demographic and health related measures. Additionally there will be an examination, which patient characterestics may have lead to patients not having been asked about resuscitation decisions.
- Conditions
- Resuscitation
- Being tested
- Factors influencing resuscitation decisions of patients, Factors leading to not asking patients about resuscitation preference
- Keywords
- resuscitation decision
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Factors influencing resuscitation decisions of patientsOther
Factors leading to not asking patients about resuscitation preferenceOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Admitted patients at the ED | Not described Receives: Other: Factors influencing resuscitation decisions of patients; Other: Factors leading to not asking patients about resuscitation preference |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Resuscitation decision of the patient
Answer to the question "Do you want life prolonging treatment if necessary?"
Measured: During stay at ED (range: <1 hour until 31 days)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Patient characterestics, which may have lead to patients not having been asked about resuscitation decisions
Age, gender, resuscitation decision, ICD codes
Measured: During stay at ED (range: <1 hour until 31 days)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2015
- Primary completionDec 2016
- Study completionDec 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for ResuscitationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 10,000 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Basel, Max Planck Institute for Human Development
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Roland Bingisser, Prof., Principal investigator, University Hospital Basel, Emergency Department
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02575573
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REDEED
- Acronym
- REDEED
- Status last verified
- Jan 2018
- First submitted
- 6 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 3 Jan 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jan 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Influencing Factors on Resuscitation Decisions in the ED
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02575573
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REDEED / REDEED
- Conditions
- Resuscitation
- Keywords
- resuscitation decision
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10,000 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Basel, Max Planck Institute for Human Development
- Study start
- Oct 2015
- Primary completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators will retrospectively examine the connection between resuscitation decisions of admitted patients at the ED of the University Hospital of Basel and several demographic and health related measures. Additionally there will be an examination, which patient characterestics may have lead to patients not having been asked about resuscitation decisions.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Admitted patients at the ED | – | Other: Factors influencing resuscitation decisions of patients, Other: Factors leading to not asking patients about resuscitation preference |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Admitted patients from the Emergency Department of the University Hospital of Basel between the 1st of January 2010 and the 31st of December 2014.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients admitted to the emergency department (duration of hospitalisation more than 24 h).
- Patients with a research consent "yes".
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients being discharged within less than 24 hours.
- Patients with a research consent "no".
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Factors influencing resuscitation decisions of patients | Other | Admitted patients at the ED |
| Factors leading to not asking patients about resuscitation preference | Other | Admitted patients at the ED |
Primary outcome
Resuscitation decision of the patient
Time frame: During stay at ED (range: <1 hour until 31 days)
Answer to the question "Do you want life prolonging treatment if necessary?"
1 secondary outcome
Patient characterestics, which may have lead to patients not having been asked about resuscitation decisions
Time frame: During stay at ED (range: <1 hour until 31 days)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jan 2018.
Related trials for Resuscitation
Recruiting
Optimization of Saturation Targets And Resuscitation Trial (OptiSTART)
Premature Infants, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ultrasound-Calibrated Pulse Contour Cardiac Output Monitoring: Value and Accuracy in Hemodynamic Care
Sepsis, Circulatory Instability
Not yet recruiting
Compression-Only Versus Standard Basic Life Support Training in Nursing Students
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Not yet recruiting
Execution of Prehospital Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Patients With Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA)
Not yet recruiting
Deep-plane Facelift As A Staged Adjunct To Facial Reanimation : Functional And Aesthetic Outcomes in Comparison to Facial Reanimation Alone
Facial Palsy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Roland Bingisser, Prof. principal investigator
University Hospital Basel, Emergency Department
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Resuscitation, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Resuscitation decision of the patient (time frame: During stay at ED (range: <1 hour until 31 days)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jan 2018.