AzTrials
AzTrials

ThyroidectomyNCT02577068

Combination Effect of Nefopam With Propacetamol for Postoperative Pain After Thyroidectomy

A study testing Nefopam and Propacetamol in people with Thyroidectomy and Pain, run by Yonsei University at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patients undergoing thyroidectomy are suffering not only surgical wound pain but posterior neck pain because of neck extension position during the surgery. However, there has been little attention of posterior neck pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Thyroidectomy, Pain
What is being tested?
Nefopam and Propacetamol
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
84 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
15 Nov 2015to 23 Aug 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patient who undergone open thyroidectomy
  • 20~70 years old
  • ASA I~III

Who cannot join

  • hypersensitivity on Nefopam and Propacetamol
  • Liver failure, chronic alcohol addiction
  • severe hemolytic anemia, chronic nutrition deficiency
  • history of seizure
  • MI, MAO inhibitor
  • pregnant, breast-feeding
  • foreigners

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine

    Seoul, 120-752

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Patients undergoing thyroidectomy are suffering not only surgical wound pain but posterior neck pain because of neck extension position during the surgery. However, there has been little attention of posterior neck pain. Nefopam and Propacetamol have different pharmacodynamics and been used for postoperative pain control in thyroidectomy patients. The aim of this study is evaluation of combination effect of Nefopam and Propacetamol for acute wound pain, posterior neck pain and chronic pain after thyroidectomy.

Conditions
Thyroidectomy, Pain
Being tested
Nefopam, Propacetamol
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NefopamDrug

    Patients undergoing thyroidectomy receive medications depending on the group allocation 30minutes prior to the surgery end; Nefopam 20mg, Propacetamol 2g, and Nefopam 20mg+Propacetamol 2g. In addition, patients will take the same medication every six hours during POD 1.

  • PropacetamolDrug

    Patients undergoing thyroidectomy receive medications depending on the group allocation 30minutes prior to the surgery end; Nefopam 20mg, Propacetamol 2g, and Nefopam 20mg+Propacetamol 2g. In addition, patients will take the same medication every six hours during POD 1.

Study groups in NCT02577068
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
nefopam groupActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Nefopam
propacetamol groupActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Propacetamol
nefopam and propacetamol groupExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Nefopam; Drug: Propacetamol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. VAS score on wound site and posterior neck

    Patients' subject pain score through VAS on the surgery wound site and posterior neck.

    Measured: one hour after the surgery

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Additional pain rescue drug

    how much of pain rescue drugs taken besides PCA

    Measured: for postop. 24hrs.

  2. Postoperative nausea and vomiting

    nausea score (0-none, 1- a little, 2- moderate, 3-severe) and vomiting (all or none)

    Measured: for postop. 24hrs.

  3. Patient satisfaction

    Patients satisfaction score ( 0- dissatisfaction, 1- a little dissatisfaction, 2- average, 3- a little satisfaction, 4- satisfaction)

    Measured: for postop. 24hrs.

  4. Chronic pain and neurogenic pain

    Neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire(DN 4) :

    The DN4 questionnaire consists of a total of 10 items grouped in 4 sections. The first seven items are related to the quality of pain (burning, painful cold, electric shocks) and its association to abnormal sensations (tingling, pins and needles, numbness, itching). The other 3 items are related to neurological examination in the painful area (touch hypoesthesia, pinprick hypoesthesia, tactile allodynia). A score of 1 is given to each positive item and a score of 0 to each negative item. The total score is calculated as the sum of all 10 items, and the cut-off value for the diagnosis of neuropathic pain is a total score of 4/10. All questions are related to pain which is the claim for current medical consultation.

    Measured: three month after the surgery.

  5. acute VAS on wound site and posterior neck

    VAS for patients' subject pain scor

    Measured: postop. 24hrs.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Oct 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start15 Nov 2015
  3. Primary completion23 Aug 2016
  4. Study completion23 Aug 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
84 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02577068
Sponsor's protocol ID
4-2015-0746
Status last verified
Feb 2019
First submitted
6 Oct 2015
Last updated
21 Mar 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Han DW, Koo BN, Chung WY, Park CS, Kim SY, Palmer PP, Kim KJ. Preoperative greater occipital nerve block in total thyroidectomy patients can reduce postoperative occipital headache and posterior neck pain. Thyroid. 2006 Jun;16(6):599-603. doi: 10.1089/thy.2006.16.599.

    PubMed 16839262

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Nefopam and Propacetamol in people with Thyroidectomy and Pain, run by Yonsei University at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

VAS score on wound site and posterior neck (time frame: one hour after the surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02577068, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in