HungerNCT02577705
Building Wealth and Health Network: A Microfinance/TANF Demonstration Project
A study testing Self Empowerment Groups, Financial Empowerment and Matched Savings in people with Hunger and Child Development, run by Center for Hunger-Free Communities at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goals of the The Building Wealth and Health Network (The Network) are to develop and rigorously test an asset building model that will build financial, social and human capital through asset building, financial education and trauma-informed peer support. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Hunger, Child Development, Social Isolation
- What is being tested?
- Self Empowerment Groups, Financial Empowerment and Matched Savings
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 145 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 16 Jun 2014to 31 Dec 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Recipients of TANF cash benefits for four years or less, and
- Subject to mandatory TANF 20-hour work requirement, and
- Parents of at least one child below the age of six
Who cannot join
- Adults who are unable to provide consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Drexel University School of Public Health
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
About this study
The goals of the The Building Wealth and Health Network (The Network) are to develop and rigorously test an asset building model that will build financial, social and human capital through asset building, financial education and trauma-informed peer support. Program components include: 1) Matched savings accounts; 2) Financial literacy classes; and 3) Peer support groups using the Sanctuary ® trauma-informed approach to social services. This program is offered in partnership with the Department of Public Welfare of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The program elements will fulfill work requirements for the program called temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF).
The hypothesis is that the program's combination of services will result in improved economic security through boosting income, increasing assets, and building a supportive social network, that then translates to better health outcomes.
Read the detailed description
Families with young children under age six participating in The Temporary Assistance for NeedyFamilies Program (TANF) that are deemed "work mandatory" are required to participate in work-related activities for at least 20 hours per week in order to receive TANF benefits. However, due to financial hardship, poor health, and exposure to violence and adversity, the success families achieve through TANF participation can be limited.
In 2013, 45.3 million people lived in poverty in the United States, including over one in five children under the age of six, yet only 27% of eligible families received Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). While child poverty increases the risk of poor health and developmental delays, many public assistance programs, such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), and housing subsidies, protect vulnerable children from the negative effects of poverty. However, it is unclear if TANF has demonstrated significant improvements in maternal and child wellbeing, in moving families out of poverty, or in fully preparing low-income families for success in the workforce.
One of the goals of TANF is to provide job skills and education programs to support adults and their children as they enter the workforce. However, many families experience barriers to employment, which may prevent them from successfully transitioning off of TANF. This may be due in part to poor health among those receiving TANF, as approximately one third of TANF recipients have reported a work-limiting health condition; and almost 43% of TANF recipients reported multiple types of disability including memory impairment, emotional/mental limitations, movement limitations, and sensory impairment. In addition to the poor health and disability reported by TANF participants, they also report alarmingly high rates of exposure to violence and adversity in their communities and in their family relationships. For instance, among TANF eligible families, rates of intimate partner violence are as high as 74% compared to up to 31% in the general community, posing a major barrier to rates of employment. While exposure to violence in adulthood indicates severe hardship, such exposure to violence across the lifespan, reaching back into childhood, is also reported at significantly higher rates among low-income families. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) consisting of physical and emotional abuse and neglect, sexual abuse, and household dysfunction, such as having a household member in prison, or witnessing domestic violence are especially prevalent among those receiving TANF. ACEs and violence exposure are closely linked to work-limiting conditions such as depression, cardiovascular disease, food insecurity and other health conditions. Exposure to ACEs has been linked to higher rates of worker absenteeism and stress surrounding work and finances in adulthood, indicating an association between ACEs and later financial stability. Other related barriers to work are having a criminal record, or having served time in prison, and among female heads of household TANF recipients, the prevalence of interactions with the criminal justice system is quite high compared to other low income populations. Finally, when a parent of a young child is in prison, it can have detrimental effects on the child's development, which in turn, demands more attention, time and care by adult caregivers, creating more barriers to work. Female heads of households who have a criminal history are at greater risk for reaching the TANF time limit which can exacerbate the barriers of obtaining employment. Furthermore, children whose parents have a criminal history are at a greater risk of becoming involved in the criminal justice system and are more likely to exhibit high-risk behaviors than children in the general population.
The high levels of adversity among TANF recipients and those living in poverty is a significant concern because adversity impacts physical and mental health, academic achievement, employment, the development of executive skills such as working memory and cognitive controls, and parenting of the next generation. Emphasis on job search and work participation for families without attention to adversity and poor health can be a set up for failure. Preliminary evidence demonstrates that social support and comprehensive approaches to social work that build resilience may have strong success in limiting the negative impacts of exposure to violence and adversity. However, the majority of TANF programs across the country rarely integrate such approaches, and in many states, TANF participants that are unable to meet the mandated work requirements, potentially due to poor health and exposure to violence and adversity, may be more likely to be "sanctioned," either have their cash benefits reduced, or cut off completely for a duration of time.
Families that receive sanctions are more likely to have significant health barriers to work participation. Additionally, those that have been sanctioned reported higher rates of intimate partner violence, and physical and behavioral health problems. Sanctions can then increase hardships families already face. For instance, compared to families who have not been sanctioned, families that experience sanction report higher rates of household food insecurity, utility shut-offs, child hospitalizations, difficulty paying for health care, homelessness, and disruptions in children's schooling. This is especially problematic as those who are sanctioned often have young children, putting those children at increased risk during sensitive developmental phases.
To compound the mental and physical barriers to work and self-sufficiency, TANF-eligible families, like many low income families, have low financial literacy, poor no credit history, few or no assets, and are unbanked (having no checking or savings account) or under-banked (having a bank account, but still primarily relying on alternative financial services such as check cashing and money orders). In order to supplement meager income, families may resort to earning income and spending money through the informal economy where they are paying higher fees for check cashing, paying bills, and acquiring loans. This lack of access to mainstream financial institutions and activities can be crippling, as savings and other tangible assets play a critical role in helping shield families from unexpected income shocks, allowing families to weather periods of economic uncertainty without falling further into poverty. Savings create a financial foundation, increase economic security, and can be, over time, invested into education for children. Asset building activities show improvements in health, greater civic and community involvement, and lower rates in the intergenerational transfer of poverty. Savings can also reduce the extreme stress that often accompanies maternal depression. Finally, the positive impacts of savings have held true even during the recession.
In partnership with the state of Pennsylvania Health and Human Services Department, The Building Wealth and Health Network (The Network), a randomized, controlled pilot study, sought to evaluate effectiveness of an intervention to address family hardships associated with exposure to adversity and violence, social isolation, and low financial capability in order to help families get on the pathway to self-sufficiency.
- Conditions
- Hunger, Child Development, Social Isolation
- Being tested
- Self Empowerment Groups, Financial Empowerment, Matched Savings
- Keywords
- food insecurity, adverse childhood experiences, violence exposure, trauma, poverty, TANF, assets, depression, randomized control trial
- Medical subject headings
- Social Isolation, Wounds and Injuries, Depression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Self Empowerment GroupsBehavioural
The Self Empowerment Groups (SEG) curriculum draws key components from the S.E.L.F. tool within Sanctuary, focusing the four domains: creating personal, emotional, moral and physical safety (S), processing and managing emotions (E), recognizing loss and letting go (L), and developing goals for a sense of future (F). S.E.L.F. establishes a common language that all people who have experienced adversity can use to organize their lives and work towards building stable foundations to support their goals and invest in their potential.
Financial EmpowermentBehavioural
The Financial Empowerment curriculum developed for this study consisted of interactive exercises, worksheets, and journal assignments that fostered understanding and practice of banking, building credit and debt management, making the most of one's money, and setting financial goals for oneself and one's family. Content focused on identifying and harnessing the internal and external resources that participants can leverage to begin taking steps towards financial self-sufficiency.
Matched SavingsBehavioural
Participants were assisted with opening a savings accounts at a local non-profit federal credit union (with 1:1 matches of up to twenty dollars per month) over the course of 12 months.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Self Empowerment Groups | Experimental | Intervention activities included helping participants to open savings accounts at a local federal credit union with 1:1 matches of up to twenty dollars per month for 12 months. Participants also received financial empowerment and Peer Support curriculum, weekly for about 3 hours per week for 28 weeks. Receives: Behavioral: Self Empowerment Groups; Behavioral: Financial Empowerment; Behavioral: Matched Savings |
| Financial Empowerment | Experimental | Intervention activities included helping participants to open savings accounts at a local federal credit union with 1:1 matches of up to twenty dollars per month for 12 months. Participants also received financial empowerment weekly for about 3 hours per week for 28 weeks. Receives: Behavioral: Financial Empowerment; Behavioral: Matched Savings |
| Control Group | No intervention | The Control group did not receive assistance in opening a matched savings account, and were required by the County Assistance Office to participate in other Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) mandated work participation activities according to standard procedure. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in family economic hardship
Family economic hardship is a singular outcome captured in three measures of hardship:
- The U.S Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM) which measures food insecurity, 2) an energy security survey, which measures "energy insecurity," and 3) a housing security survey, which measures "housing instability." These three measures combine into a singular measure of hardship that consists of
"No hardship" [no positive response to three hardships above] "Moderate hardship" [at least one of the three hardships] and "Severe hardship" [consisting of 2 or 3 hardships]
Measured: Quarterly change for up to 15 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Change in Career readiness
Career readiness is measured using the employment hope scale.
Measured: Quarterly change for up to 15 months
Change in Mental Health
To assess depressive symptoms among adult participants, we used the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D).
Measured: Quarterly change for up to 15 months
Change in Child development
Children's developmental status was measured by the Parents' Evaluations of Developmental Status Survey. Participants were asked ten questions about their child's developmental issues: global/cognitive, expressive language and articulation, fine-motor, gross motor, behavior, social-emotional, self-help, school, and any other concerns.
Measured: Quarterly change for up to 15 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Study start16 Jun 2014
- Primary completion31 Dec 2015
- Study completion31 Dec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (76)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HungerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 145 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Center for Hunger-Free Communities
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mariana Chilton, PhD, MPH, Drexel University
- Investigators
- Mariana Chilton, PhD, MPH, Principal investigator, Drexel University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02577705
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1041002551
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 13 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 1 Feb 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Duncan GJ, Brooks-Gunn J. Family poverty, welfare reform, and child development. Child Dev. 2000 Jan-Feb;71(1):188-96. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00133.
PubMed 10836573Black MM, Quigg AM, Cook J, Casey PH, Cutts DB, Chilton M, Meyers A, Ettinger de Cuba S, Heeren T, Coleman S, Rose-Jacobs R, Frank DA. WIC participation and attenuation of stress-related child health risks of household food insecurity and caregiver depressive symptoms. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 May;166(5):444-51. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1.
PubMed 22566545Frank DA, Chilton M, Casey PH, Black MM, Cook JT, Cutts DB, Meyers AF. Nutritional-assistance programs play a critical role in reducing food insecurity. Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):e1267; author reply e1267-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0808. No abstract available.
PubMed 20435705Dworsky, A. and M.E. Courtney, Barriers to employment among TANF applicants and their consequences for self-sufficiency. Families in Society-the Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 2007. 88(3): p. 379-389.
Trisi, D. and L. Pavetti, TANF Weakening as a Safety Net for Poor Families, in Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3700, Editor. 2012, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities: Washington, D.C
Bloom, D., P.J. Loprest, and S.R. Zedlewski, TANf recipients with barriers to employment. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program-Research Synthesis Brief, 2011. 1
Loprest, P. and E. Maag, Disabilities among TANF recipients: Evidence from NHIS. 2009, The Urban Institute: Washington, D.C.
Kennedy AC. Urban adolescent mothers exposed to community, family, and partner violence: prevalence, outcomes, and welfare policy implications. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2006 Jan;76(1):44-54. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.76.1.44.
PubMed 16569126Bowie, S.L. and D.M. Dopwell, Metastressors as barriers to self-sufficiency among TANF-reliant African American and Latina women. Affilia, 2013
Lown EA, Schmidt LA, Wiley J. Interpersonal violence among women seeking welfare: unraveling lives. Am J Public Health. 2006 Aug;96(8):1409-15. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.057786. Epub 2006 Jun 29.
PubMed 16809602Raphael J. Keeping battered women safe during welfare reform: new challenges. J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 2002 Winter;57(1):32-5.
PubMed 11905488Cheng TC. Intimate partner violence and welfare participation: a longitudinal causal analysis. J Interpers Violence. 2013 Mar;28(4):808-30. doi: 10.1177/0886260512455863. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
PubMed 22929347Adams AE, Bybee D, Tolman RM, Sullivan CM, Kennedy AC. Does job stability mediate the relationship between intimate partner violence and mental health among low-income women? Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2013 Oct;83(4):600-8. doi: 10.1111/ajop.12053.
PubMed 24164531Staggs SL, Long SM, Mason GE, Krishnan S, Riger S. Intimate partner violence, social support, and employment in the post-welfare reform era. J Interpers Violence. 2007 Mar;22(3):345-67. doi: 10.1177/0886260506295388.
PubMed 17308203Frogner, B., R. Moffit, and D. Ribar, Leaving Welfare: Long-Term Evidence from Three Cities. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University. https://orchid. hosts. jhmi. edu/wfp/files/WP10-01_Leaving% 20Welfare. pdf, 2010.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Feb 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Building Wealth and Health Network: A Microfinance/TANF Demonstration Project
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02577705
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1041002551
- Conditions
- Hunger, Child Development, Social Isolation
- Keywords
- food insecurity, adverse childhood experiences, violence exposure, trauma, poverty, TANF, assets, depression
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 145 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Center for Hunger-Free CommunitiesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Jun 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goals of the The Building Wealth and Health Network (The Network) are to develop and rigorously test an asset building model that will build financial, social and human capital through asset building, financial education and trauma-informed peer support. Program components include: 1) Matched savings accounts; 2) Financial literacy classes; and 3) Peer support groups using the Sanctuary ® trauma-informed approach to social services. This program is offered in partnership with the Department of Public Welfare of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The program elements will fulfill work requirements for the program called temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF).
The hypothesis is that the program's combination of services will result in improved economic security through boosting income, increasing assets, and building a supportive social network, that then translates to better health outcomes.
Detailed description
Families with young children under age six participating in The Temporary Assistance for NeedyFamilies Program (TANF) that are deemed "work mandatory" are required to participate in work-related activities for at least 20 hours per week in order to receive TANF benefits. However, due to financial hardship, poor health, and exposure to violence and adversity, the success families achieve through TANF participation can be limited.
In 2013, 45.3 million people lived in poverty in the United States, including over one in five children under the age of six, yet only 27% of eligible families received Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). While child poverty increases the risk of poor health and developmental delays, many public assistance programs, such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), and housing subsidies, protect vulnerable children from the negative effects of poverty. However, it is unclear if TANF has demonstrated significant improvements in maternal and child wellbeing, in moving families out of poverty, or in fully preparing low-income families for success in the workforce.
One of the goals of TANF is to provide job skills and education programs to support adults and their children as they enter the workforce. However, many families experience barriers to employment, which may prevent them from successfully transitioning off of TANF. This may be due in part to poor health among those receiving TANF, as approximately one third of TANF recipients have reported a work-limiting health condition; and almost 43% of TANF recipients reported multiple types of disability including memory impairment, emotional/mental limitations, movement limitations, and sensory impairment. In addition to the poor health and disability reported by TANF participants, they also report alarmingly high rates of exposure to violence and adversity in their communities and in their family relationships. For instance, among TANF eligible families, rates of intimate partner violence are as high as 74% compared to up to 31% in the general community, posing a major barrier to rates of employment. While exposure to violence in adulthood indicates severe hardship, such exposure to violence across the lifespan, reaching back into childhood, is also reported at significantly higher rates among low-income families. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) consisting of physical and emotional abuse and neglect, sexual abuse, and household dysfunction, such as having a household member in prison, or witnessing domestic violence are especially prevalent among those receiving TANF. ACEs and violence exposure are closely linked to work-limiting conditions such as depression, cardiovascular disease, food insecurity and other health conditions. Exposure to ACEs has been linked to higher rates of worker absenteeism and stress surrounding work and finances in adulthood, indicating an association between ACEs and later financial stability. Other related barriers to work are having a criminal record, or having served time in prison, and among female heads of household TANF recipients, the prevalence of interactions with the criminal justice system is quite high compared to other low income populations. Finally, when a parent of a young child is in prison, it can have detrimental effects on the child's development, which in turn, demands more attention, time and care by adult caregivers, creating more barriers to work. Female heads of households who have a criminal history are at greater risk for reaching the TANF time limit which can exacerbate the barriers of obtaining employment. Furthermore, children whose parents have a criminal history are at a greater risk of becoming involved in the criminal justice system and are more likely to exhibit high-risk behaviors than children in the general population.
The high levels of adversity among TANF recipients and those living in poverty is a significant concern because adversity impacts physical and mental health, academic achievement, employment, the development of executive skills such as working memory and cognitive controls, and parenting of the next generation. Emphasis on job search and work participation for families without attention to adversity and poor health can be a set up for failure. Preliminary evidence demonstrates that social support and comprehensive approaches to social work that build resilience may have strong success in limiting the negative impacts of exposure to violence and adversity. However, the majority of TANF programs across the country rarely integrate such approaches, and in many states, TANF participants that are unable to meet the mandated work requirements, potentially due to poor health and exposure to violence and adversity, may be more likely to be "sanctioned," either have their cash benefits reduced, or cut off completely for a duration of time.
Families that receive sanctions are more likely to have significant health barriers to work participation. Additionally, those that have been sanctioned reported higher rates of intimate partner violence, and physical and behavioral health problems. Sanctions can then increase hardships families already face. For instance, compared to families who have not been sanctioned, families that experience sanction report higher rates of household food insecurity, utility shut-offs, child hospitalizations, difficulty paying for health care, homelessness, and disruptions in children's schooling. This is especially problematic as those who are sanctioned often have young children, putting those children at increased risk during sensitive developmental phases.
To compound the mental and physical barriers to work and self-sufficiency, TANF-eligible families, like many low income families, have low financial literacy, poor no credit history, few or no assets, and are unbanked (having no checking or savings account) or under-banked (having a bank account, but still primarily relying on alternative financial services such as check cashing and money orders). In order to supplement meager income, families may resort to earning income and spending money through the informal economy where they are paying higher fees for check cashing, paying bills, and acquiring loans. This lack of access to mainstream financial institutions and activities can be crippling, as savings and other tangible assets play a critical role in helping shield families from unexpected income shocks, allowing families to weather periods of economic uncertainty without falling further into poverty. Savings create a financial foundation, increase economic security, and can be, over time, invested into education for children. Asset building activities show improvements in health, greater civic and community involvement, and lower rates in the intergenerational transfer of poverty. Savings can also reduce the extreme stress that often accompanies maternal depression. Finally, the positive impacts of savings have held true even during the recession.
In partnership with the state of Pennsylvania Health and Human Services Department, The Building Wealth and Health Network (The Network), a randomized, controlled pilot study, sought to evaluate effectiveness of an intervention to address family hardships associated with exposure to adversity and violence, social isolation, and low financial capability in order to help families get on the pathway to self-sufficiency.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Self Empowerment Groups | Experimental | Behavioral: Self Empowerment Groups, Behavioral: Financial Empowerment, Behavioral: Matched SavingsIntervention activities included helping participants to open savings accounts at a local federal credit union with 1:1 matches of up to twenty dollars per month for 12 months. Participants also received financial empowerment and Peer Support curriculum, weekly for about 3 hours per week for 28 weeks. |
| Financial Empowerment | Experimental | Behavioral: Financial Empowerment, Behavioral: Matched SavingsIntervention activities included helping participants to open savings accounts at a local federal credit union with 1:1 matches of up to twenty dollars per month for 12 months. Participants also received financial empowerment weekly for about 3 hours per week for 28 weeks. |
| Control Group | No intervention | –The Control group did not receive assistance in opening a matched savings account, and were required by the County Assistance Office to participate in other Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) mandated work participation activities according to standard procedure. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Recipients of TANF cash benefits for four years or less, and
- Subject to mandatory TANF 20-hour work requirement, and
- Parents of at least one child below the age of six
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adults who are unable to provide consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Self Empowerment GroupsThe Self Empowerment Groups (SEG) curriculum draws key components from the S.E.L.F. tool within Sanctuary, focusing the four domains: creating personal, emotional, moral and physical safety (S), processing and managing emotions (E), recognizing loss and letting go (L), and developing goals for a sense of future (F). S.E.L.F. establishes a common language that all people who have experienced adversity can use to organize their lives and work towards building stable foundations to support their goals and invest in their potential. | Behavioural | Self Empowerment Groups |
| Financial EmpowermentThe Financial Empowerment curriculum developed for this study consisted of interactive exercises, worksheets, and journal assignments that fostered understanding and practice of banking, building credit and debt management, making the most of one's money, and setting financial goals for oneself and one's family. Content focused on identifying and harnessing the internal and external resources that participants can leverage to begin taking steps towards financial self-sufficiency. | Behavioural | Financial Empowerment, Self Empowerment Groups |
| Matched SavingsParticipants were assisted with opening a savings accounts at a local non-profit federal credit union (with 1:1 matches of up to twenty dollars per month) over the course of 12 months. | Behavioural | Financial Empowerment, Self Empowerment Groups |
Primary outcome
Change in family economic hardship
Time frame: Quarterly change for up to 15 months
Family economic hardship is a singular outcome captured in three measures of hardship: 1) The U.S Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM) which measures food insecurity, 2) an energy security survey, which measures "energy insecurity," and 3) a housing security survey, which measures "housing instability." These three measures combine into a singular measure of hardship that consists of "No hardship" [no positive response to three hardships above] "Moderate hardship" [at least one of the three hardships] and "Severe hardship" [consisting of 2 or 3 hardships]
3 secondary outcomes
Change in Career readiness
Time frame: Quarterly change for up to 15 months
Change in Mental Health
Time frame: Quarterly change for up to 15 months
Change in Child development
Time frame: Quarterly change for up to 15 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Feb 2017.
- Background: PubMed 10836573Duncan GJ, Brooks-Gunn J. Family poverty, welfare reform, and child development. Child Dev. 2000 Jan-Feb;71(1):188-96. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00133.
- Background: PubMed 22566545Black MM, Quigg AM, Cook J, Casey PH, Cutts DB, Chilton M, Meyers A, Ettinger de Cuba S, Heeren T, Coleman S, Rose-Jacobs R, Frank DA. WIC participation and attenuation of stress-related child health risks of household food insecurity and caregiver depressive symptoms. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 May;166(5):444-51. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1.
- Background: PubMed 20435705Frank DA, Chilton M, Casey PH, Black MM, Cook JT, Cutts DB, Meyers AF. Nutritional-assistance programs play a critical role in reducing food insecurity. Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):e1267; author reply e1267-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0808. No abstract available.
- BackgroundDworsky, A. and M.E. Courtney, Barriers to employment among TANF applicants and their consequences for self-sufficiency. Families in Society-the Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 2007. 88(3): p. 379-389.
- BackgroundTrisi, D. and L. Pavetti, TANF Weakening as a Safety Net for Poor Families, in Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3700, Editor. 2012, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities: Washington, D.C
- BackgroundBloom, D., P.J. Loprest, and S.R. Zedlewski, TANf recipients with barriers to employment. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program-Research Synthesis Brief, 2011. 1
- BackgroundLoprest, P. and E. Maag, Disabilities among TANF recipients: Evidence from NHIS. 2009, The Urban Institute: Washington, D.C.
- Background: PubMed 16569126Kennedy AC. Urban adolescent mothers exposed to community, family, and partner violence: prevalence, outcomes, and welfare policy implications. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2006 Jan;76(1):44-54. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.76.1.44.
- BackgroundBowie, S.L. and D.M. Dopwell, Metastressors as barriers to self-sufficiency among TANF-reliant African American and Latina women. Affilia, 2013
- Background: PubMed 16809602Lown EA, Schmidt LA, Wiley J. Interpersonal violence among women seeking welfare: unraveling lives. Am J Public Health. 2006 Aug;96(8):1409-15. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.057786. Epub 2006 Jun 29.
- Background: PubMed 11905488Raphael J. Keeping battered women safe during welfare reform: new challenges. J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 2002 Winter;57(1):32-5.
- Background: PubMed 22929347Cheng TC. Intimate partner violence and welfare participation: a longitudinal causal analysis. J Interpers Violence. 2013 Mar;28(4):808-30. doi: 10.1177/0886260512455863. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
Related trials for Hunger
Recruiting
Satiety, Microbiome, Appetite Regulation, and Tracking Energy Across Targeted Snacks: Chronic Study
Healthy Participants, Healthy Adult Subject
Recruiting
Satiety, Microbiome, Appetite Regulation, and Tracking Energy Across Targeted Snacks: Acute Postprandial Study
Healthy Participants, Healthy Adult Subject
Active, not recruiting
Diabetes Prevention Program With or Without Hunger Training in Helping to Lower Breast Cancer Risk in Obese Participants
Deleterious BRCA1 Gene Mutation, Deleterious BRCA2 Gene Mutation
Recruiting
Assessing the Relationships Between Parent-child Eating in the Absence of Hunger, Appetitive Traits, and Food Parenting.
Eating in Absence of Hunger, Food Parenting
Recruiting
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Nutritional Supplement Packages on Improving School Children's Hunger, Eating Behavior and Classroom Concentration
Classroom Concentration, Dietary Diversity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mariana Chilton, PhD, MPH principal investigator
Drexel University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Self Empowerment Groups, Financial Empowerment and Matched Savings in people with Hunger and Child Development, run by Center for Hunger-Free Communities at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in family economic hardship (time frame: Quarterly change for up to 15 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02577705, which also lists 76 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Feb 2017.