AzTrials
AzTrials

HungerNCT02577705

Building Wealth and Health Network: A Microfinance/TANF Demonstration Project

A study testing Self Empowerment Groups, Financial Empowerment and Matched Savings in people with Hunger and Child Development, run by Center for Hunger-Free Communities at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goals of the The Building Wealth and Health Network (The Network) are to develop and rigorously test an asset building model that will build financial, social and human capital through asset building, financial education and trauma-informed peer support. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Hunger, Child Development, Social Isolation
What is being tested?
Self Empowerment Groups, Financial Empowerment and Matched Savings
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
145 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
16 Jun 2014to 31 Dec 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Recipients of TANF cash benefits for four years or less, and
  • Subject to mandatory TANF 20-hour work requirement, and
  • Parents of at least one child below the age of six

Who cannot join

  • Adults who are unable to provide consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Drexel University School of Public Health

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

Other trials in United States

About this study

The goals of the The Building Wealth and Health Network (The Network) are to develop and rigorously test an asset building model that will build financial, social and human capital through asset building, financial education and trauma-informed peer support. Program components include: 1) Matched savings accounts; 2) Financial literacy classes; and 3) Peer support groups using the Sanctuary ® trauma-informed approach to social services. This program is offered in partnership with the Department of Public Welfare of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The program elements will fulfill work requirements for the program called temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF).

The hypothesis is that the program's combination of services will result in improved economic security through boosting income, increasing assets, and building a supportive social network, that then translates to better health outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Families with young children under age six participating in The Temporary Assistance for NeedyFamilies Program (TANF) that are deemed "work mandatory" are required to participate in work-related activities for at least 20 hours per week in order to receive TANF benefits. However, due to financial hardship, poor health, and exposure to violence and adversity, the success families achieve through TANF participation can be limited.

In 2013, 45.3 million people lived in poverty in the United States, including over one in five children under the age of six, yet only 27% of eligible families received Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). While child poverty increases the risk of poor health and developmental delays, many public assistance programs, such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), and housing subsidies, protect vulnerable children from the negative effects of poverty. However, it is unclear if TANF has demonstrated significant improvements in maternal and child wellbeing, in moving families out of poverty, or in fully preparing low-income families for success in the workforce.

One of the goals of TANF is to provide job skills and education programs to support adults and their children as they enter the workforce. However, many families experience barriers to employment, which may prevent them from successfully transitioning off of TANF. This may be due in part to poor health among those receiving TANF, as approximately one third of TANF recipients have reported a work-limiting health condition; and almost 43% of TANF recipients reported multiple types of disability including memory impairment, emotional/mental limitations, movement limitations, and sensory impairment. In addition to the poor health and disability reported by TANF participants, they also report alarmingly high rates of exposure to violence and adversity in their communities and in their family relationships. For instance, among TANF eligible families, rates of intimate partner violence are as high as 74% compared to up to 31% in the general community, posing a major barrier to rates of employment. While exposure to violence in adulthood indicates severe hardship, such exposure to violence across the lifespan, reaching back into childhood, is also reported at significantly higher rates among low-income families. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) consisting of physical and emotional abuse and neglect, sexual abuse, and household dysfunction, such as having a household member in prison, or witnessing domestic violence are especially prevalent among those receiving TANF. ACEs and violence exposure are closely linked to work-limiting conditions such as depression, cardiovascular disease, food insecurity and other health conditions. Exposure to ACEs has been linked to higher rates of worker absenteeism and stress surrounding work and finances in adulthood, indicating an association between ACEs and later financial stability. Other related barriers to work are having a criminal record, or having served time in prison, and among female heads of household TANF recipients, the prevalence of interactions with the criminal justice system is quite high compared to other low income populations. Finally, when a parent of a young child is in prison, it can have detrimental effects on the child's development, which in turn, demands more attention, time and care by adult caregivers, creating more barriers to work. Female heads of households who have a criminal history are at greater risk for reaching the TANF time limit which can exacerbate the barriers of obtaining employment. Furthermore, children whose parents have a criminal history are at a greater risk of becoming involved in the criminal justice system and are more likely to exhibit high-risk behaviors than children in the general population.

The high levels of adversity among TANF recipients and those living in poverty is a significant concern because adversity impacts physical and mental health, academic achievement, employment, the development of executive skills such as working memory and cognitive controls, and parenting of the next generation. Emphasis on job search and work participation for families without attention to adversity and poor health can be a set up for failure. Preliminary evidence demonstrates that social support and comprehensive approaches to social work that build resilience may have strong success in limiting the negative impacts of exposure to violence and adversity. However, the majority of TANF programs across the country rarely integrate such approaches, and in many states, TANF participants that are unable to meet the mandated work requirements, potentially due to poor health and exposure to violence and adversity, may be more likely to be "sanctioned," either have their cash benefits reduced, or cut off completely for a duration of time.

Families that receive sanctions are more likely to have significant health barriers to work participation. Additionally, those that have been sanctioned reported higher rates of intimate partner violence, and physical and behavioral health problems. Sanctions can then increase hardships families already face. For instance, compared to families who have not been sanctioned, families that experience sanction report higher rates of household food insecurity, utility shut-offs, child hospitalizations, difficulty paying for health care, homelessness, and disruptions in children's schooling. This is especially problematic as those who are sanctioned often have young children, putting those children at increased risk during sensitive developmental phases.

To compound the mental and physical barriers to work and self-sufficiency, TANF-eligible families, like many low income families, have low financial literacy, poor no credit history, few or no assets, and are unbanked (having no checking or savings account) or under-banked (having a bank account, but still primarily relying on alternative financial services such as check cashing and money orders). In order to supplement meager income, families may resort to earning income and spending money through the informal economy where they are paying higher fees for check cashing, paying bills, and acquiring loans. This lack of access to mainstream financial institutions and activities can be crippling, as savings and other tangible assets play a critical role in helping shield families from unexpected income shocks, allowing families to weather periods of economic uncertainty without falling further into poverty. Savings create a financial foundation, increase economic security, and can be, over time, invested into education for children. Asset building activities show improvements in health, greater civic and community involvement, and lower rates in the intergenerational transfer of poverty. Savings can also reduce the extreme stress that often accompanies maternal depression. Finally, the positive impacts of savings have held true even during the recession.

In partnership with the state of Pennsylvania Health and Human Services Department, The Building Wealth and Health Network (The Network), a randomized, controlled pilot study, sought to evaluate effectiveness of an intervention to address family hardships associated with exposure to adversity and violence, social isolation, and low financial capability in order to help families get on the pathway to self-sufficiency.

Being tested
Self Empowerment Groups, Financial Empowerment, Matched Savings
Keywords
food insecurity, adverse childhood experiences, violence exposure, trauma, poverty, TANF, assets, depression, randomized control trial
Medical subject headings
Social Isolation, Wounds and Injuries, Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Self Empowerment GroupsBehavioural

    The Self Empowerment Groups (SEG) curriculum draws key components from the S.E.L.F. tool within Sanctuary, focusing the four domains: creating personal, emotional, moral and physical safety (S), processing and managing emotions (E), recognizing loss and letting go (L), and developing goals for a sense of future (F). S.E.L.F. establishes a common language that all people who have experienced adversity can use to organize their lives and work towards building stable foundations to support their goals and invest in their potential.

  • Financial EmpowermentBehavioural

    The Financial Empowerment curriculum developed for this study consisted of interactive exercises, worksheets, and journal assignments that fostered understanding and practice of banking, building credit and debt management, making the most of one's money, and setting financial goals for oneself and one's family. Content focused on identifying and harnessing the internal and external resources that participants can leverage to begin taking steps towards financial self-sufficiency.

  • Matched SavingsBehavioural

    Participants were assisted with opening a savings accounts at a local non-profit federal credit union (with 1:1 matches of up to twenty dollars per month) over the course of 12 months.

Study groups in NCT02577705
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Self Empowerment GroupsExperimentalIntervention activities included helping participants to open savings accounts at a local federal credit union with 1:1 matches of up to twenty dollars per month for 12 months. Participants also received financial empowerment and Peer Support curriculum, weekly for about 3 hours per week for 28 weeks.
Receives: Behavioral: Self Empowerment Groups; Behavioral: Financial Empowerment; Behavioral: Matched Savings
Financial EmpowermentExperimentalIntervention activities included helping participants to open savings accounts at a local federal credit union with 1:1 matches of up to twenty dollars per month for 12 months. Participants also received financial empowerment weekly for about 3 hours per week for 28 weeks.
Receives: Behavioral: Financial Empowerment; Behavioral: Matched Savings
Control GroupNo interventionThe Control group did not receive assistance in opening a matched savings account, and were required by the County Assistance Office to participate in other Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) mandated work participation activities according to standard procedure.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in family economic hardship

    Family economic hardship is a singular outcome captured in three measures of hardship:

    1. The U.S Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM) which measures food insecurity, 2) an energy security survey, which measures "energy insecurity," and 3) a housing security survey, which measures "housing instability." These three measures combine into a singular measure of hardship that consists of

    "No hardship" [no positive response to three hardships above] "Moderate hardship" [at least one of the three hardships] and "Severe hardship" [consisting of 2 or 3 hardships]

    Measured: Quarterly change for up to 15 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Change in Career readiness

    Career readiness is measured using the employment hope scale.

    Measured: Quarterly change for up to 15 months

  2. Change in Mental Health

    To assess depressive symptoms among adult participants, we used the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D).

    Measured: Quarterly change for up to 15 months

  3. Change in Child development

    Children's developmental status was measured by the Parents' Evaluations of Developmental Status Survey. Participants were asked ten questions about their child's developmental issues: global/cognitive, expressive language and articulation, fine-motor, gross motor, behavior, social-emotional, self-help, school, and any other concerns.

    Measured: Quarterly change for up to 15 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Oct 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start16 Jun 2014
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2015
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
145 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02577705
Sponsor's protocol ID
1041002551
Status last verified
Oct 2015
First submitted
13 Oct 2015
Last updated
1 Feb 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Duncan GJ, Brooks-Gunn J. Family poverty, welfare reform, and child development. Child Dev. 2000 Jan-Feb;71(1):188-96. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00133.

    PubMed 10836573
  • Black MM, Quigg AM, Cook J, Casey PH, Cutts DB, Chilton M, Meyers A, Ettinger de Cuba S, Heeren T, Coleman S, Rose-Jacobs R, Frank DA. WIC participation and attenuation of stress-related child health risks of household food insecurity and caregiver depressive symptoms. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 May;166(5):444-51. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1.

    PubMed 22566545
  • Frank DA, Chilton M, Casey PH, Black MM, Cook JT, Cutts DB, Meyers AF. Nutritional-assistance programs play a critical role in reducing food insecurity. Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):e1267; author reply e1267-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0808. No abstract available.

    PubMed 20435705
  • Dworsky, A. and M.E. Courtney, Barriers to employment among TANF applicants and their consequences for self-sufficiency. Families in Society-the Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 2007. 88(3): p. 379-389.

  • Trisi, D. and L. Pavetti, TANF Weakening as a Safety Net for Poor Families, in Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3700, Editor. 2012, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities: Washington, D.C

  • Bloom, D., P.J. Loprest, and S.R. Zedlewski, TANf recipients with barriers to employment. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program-Research Synthesis Brief, 2011. 1

  • Loprest, P. and E. Maag, Disabilities among TANF recipients: Evidence from NHIS. 2009, The Urban Institute: Washington, D.C.

  • Kennedy AC. Urban adolescent mothers exposed to community, family, and partner violence: prevalence, outcomes, and welfare policy implications. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2006 Jan;76(1):44-54. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.76.1.44.

    PubMed 16569126
  • Bowie, S.L. and D.M. Dopwell, Metastressors as barriers to self-sufficiency among TANF-reliant African American and Latina women. Affilia, 2013

  • Lown EA, Schmidt LA, Wiley J. Interpersonal violence among women seeking welfare: unraveling lives. Am J Public Health. 2006 Aug;96(8):1409-15. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.057786. Epub 2006 Jun 29.

    PubMed 16809602
  • Raphael J. Keeping battered women safe during welfare reform: new challenges. J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 2002 Winter;57(1):32-5.

    PubMed 11905488
  • Cheng TC. Intimate partner violence and welfare participation: a longitudinal causal analysis. J Interpers Violence. 2013 Mar;28(4):808-30. doi: 10.1177/0886260512455863. Epub 2012 Aug 27.

    PubMed 22929347
  • Adams AE, Bybee D, Tolman RM, Sullivan CM, Kennedy AC. Does job stability mediate the relationship between intimate partner violence and mental health among low-income women? Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2013 Oct;83(4):600-8. doi: 10.1111/ajop.12053.

    PubMed 24164531
  • Staggs SL, Long SM, Mason GE, Krishnan S, Riger S. Intimate partner violence, social support, and employment in the post-welfare reform era. J Interpers Violence. 2007 Mar;22(3):345-67. doi: 10.1177/0886260506295388.

    PubMed 17308203
  • Frogner, B., R. Moffit, and D. Ribar, Leaving Welfare: Long-Term Evidence from Three Cities. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University. https://orchid. hosts. jhmi. edu/wfp/files/WP10-01_Leaving% 20Welfare. pdf, 2010.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Self Empowerment Groups, Financial Empowerment and Matched Savings in people with Hunger and Child Development, run by Center for Hunger-Free Communities at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in family economic hardship (time frame: Quarterly change for up to 15 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02577705, which also lists 76 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Feb 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in