Coronary Artery DiseaseBIOSTEMINCT02579031
A Comparison of an Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
A study testing Orsiro and Xience in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndrome, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 10 sites in Switzerland.
Trial summary
PCI is considered as the reperfusion strategy of choice for patients with acute STEMI. Data from RCTs and meta-analyses demonstrate a consistent and strong signal towards a significant reduction in MACE among patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI with newer generation stents with enhanced biocompatibility. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Orsiro and Xience
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,300 participants
- Where
- 10 sitesSwitzerland
- Study dates
- Apr 2016to May 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥18 years
- ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction
- Primary PCI occurring within 24 hours of symptom onset
- Presence of ≥1 acute infarct artery target vessel with one or more coronary artery stenoses in a native coronary artery from 2.25 to 4.0 mm in diameter that can be covered with one or multiple coronary stents
Who cannot join
- Known allergy to aspirin, Ticagrelor, Prasugrel, Clopidogrel, Sirolimus, Everolimus or contrast media
- Planned surgery within 6 months of primary PCI, unless dual antiplatelet therapy could be maintained throughout the peri-surgical period
- Currently participating in another trial before reaching the primary endpoint
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Non-cardiac comorbid conditions with life expectancy of less than 1 year
- Mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction
- Acute myocardial infarction due to stent thrombosis
Trial locations and contacts
10 sites in 1 country.
10 sites in 1 country
Switzerland10 sites
Kantonsspital Aarau
Aarau
Universitätsspital Basel
Basel
Bern University Hospital, Dep. of Cardiology
Bern, 3010
Universität Freiburg
Fribourg
HUG
Geneva
Lausanne University Hospital
Lausanne, 1011
Kantonsspital Luzern
Lucerne
Kantonsspital St. Gallen
Sankt Gallen
Spital Wallis
Sion
Triemli
Zurich
About this study
PCI is considered as the reperfusion strategy of choice for patients with acute STEMI. Data from RCTs and meta-analyses demonstrate a consistent and strong signal towards a significant reduction in MACE among patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI with newer generation stents with enhanced biocompatibility.
The present trial aims at filling the current gap of evidence by providing randomized data to establish the superior clinical outcome with an ultrathin strut third-generation DES with biodegradable polymer designed to improve vascular healing in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, compared to the current state-of-the art second-generation DES with permanent polymer.
Read the detailed description
Background
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is considered nowadays as the reperfusion strategy of choice for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI, owing to a lower risk of myocardial re-infarction and improved short- and long-term survival compared to fibrinolysis. However, STEMI is still associated with poorer clinical outcomes after PCI, compared to stable CAD, with higher rates of stent thrombosis and an increased risk of myocardial re-infarction persisting throughout long-term follow-up. recent data from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses demonstrate a consistent and strong signal towards a significant reduction in major adverse cardiac events among patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI with third-generation DESs, compared with both first-generation and second-generation DESs with durable polymer. Importantly, this signal suggesting superiority of third-generation DESs in patients with STEMI has never been demonstrated with second-generation DESs. Third-generation DESs with enhanced biocompatibility may therefore have a particular clinical benefit in high-risk subgroups of patients with delayed vascular healing but these data warrants confirmation in appropriately designed randomized controlled trials.
Objective
The purpose of the study is to compare the safety and efficacy of a novel biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (Orsiro®) with a durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent (Xience Xpedition or Xience Alpine®) in a superiority trial among patients presenting with acute STEMI and undergoing primary PCI.
Methods
Eligible patients with acute STEMI presenting within 24 hours of symptom onset will undergo primary PCI. At PCI, the randomly allocated stent has to be implanted in the culprit lesion of the target vessel.
Patients will be followed-up with a hospital visit at 12 months. Patients will be followed-up for clinical endpoints by telephone at 30 days and 2 years.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndrome
- Being tested
- Orsiro, Xience
- Keywords
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Stents, Drug-Eluting Stents, Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndrome
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OrsiroDevice
Novel biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent used during primary percutaneous coronary intervention
XienceDevice
Durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent used during primary percutaneous coronary intervention
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Orsiro | Active comparator | Novel biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent Orsiro Receives: Device: Orsiro |
| Xience | Active comparator | Durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent Xience Receives: Device: Xience |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of patients with target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (Q-wave and non-Q-wave), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization
Measured: up to 12 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Number of patients with clinically indicated and not clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (TLR)
Measured: up to 30 days, 1 and 2 years
Number of patients with clinically indicated and not clinically indicated target vessel revascularization (TVR)
Measured: up to 30 days, 1 and 2 years
Number of patients with target vessel failure (TVF)
Measured: up to 30 days, 1 and 2 years
Number of patients with cardiac death
Measured: up to 30 days, 1 and 2 years
Number of patients with all-cause death (cardiac and non-cardiac)
Measured: up to 30 days, 1 and 2 years
Number of patients with myocardial infarction (Q-wave and non-Q-wave)
Measured: up to 30 days, 1 and 2 years
Number of patients with definite stent thrombosis
Measured: up to 30 days, 1 and 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2016
- Primary completionApr 2019
- Study completionMay 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,300 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Lausanne Hospitals
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Thomas Pilgrim, Prof. Dr. med., Principal investigator, Dep. of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02579031
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 288/15
- Acronym
- BIOSTEMI
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 16 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 2 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003 Jan 4;361(9351):13-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12113-7.
PubMed 12517460Kolh P, Windecker S, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Juni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A; European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines; Zamorano JL, Achenbach S, Baumgartner H, Bax JJ, Bueno H, Dean V, Deaton C, Erol C, Fagard R, Ferrari R, Hasdai D, Hoes AW, Kirchhof P, Knuuti J, Kolh P, Lancellotti P, Linhart A, Nihoyannopoulos P, Piepoli MF, Ponikowski P, Sirnes PA, Tamargo JL, Tendera M, Torbicki A, Wijns W, Windecker S; EACTS Clinical Guidelines Committee; Sousa Uva M, Achenbach S, Pepper J, Anyanwu A, Badimon L, Bauersachs J, Baumbach A, Beygui F, Bonaros N, De Carlo M, Deaton C, Dobrev D, Dunning J, Eeckhout E, Gielen S, Hasdai D, Kirchhof P, Luckraz H, Mahrholdt H, Montalescot G, Paparella D, Rastan AJ, Sanmartin M, Sergeant P, Silber S, Tamargo J, ten Berg J, Thiele H, van Geuns RJ, Wagner HO, Wassmann S, Wendler O, Zamorano JL; Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery; European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Oct;46(4):517-92. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu366. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available.
PubMed 25173601Kukreja N, Onuma Y, Garcia-Garcia H, Daemen J, van Domburg R, Serruys PW. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: long-term outcome after bare metal and drug-eluting stent implantation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Oct;1(2):103-10. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.787762. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
PubMed 20031664Brodie B, Pokharel Y, Fleishman N, Bensimhon A, Kissling G, Hansen C, Milks S, Cooper M, McAlhany C, Stuckey T. Very late stent thrombosis after primary percutaneous coronary intervention with bare-metal and drug-eluting stents for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a 15-year single-center experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jan;4(1):30-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.11.004.
PubMed 21251626Loh JP, Pendyala LK, Kitabata H, Torguson R, Omar A, Minha S, Chen F, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Waksman R. Comparison of outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention among different coronary subsets (stable and unstable angina pectoris and ST-segment and non-ST-segment myocardial infarction). Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jun 1;113(11):1794-801. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
PubMed 24837256Nakazawa G, Finn AV, Joner M, Ladich E, Kutys R, Mont EK, Gold HK, Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. Delayed arterial healing and increased late stent thrombosis at culprit sites after drug-eluting stent placement for acute myocardial infarction patients: an autopsy study. Circulation. 2008 Sep 9;118(11):1138-45. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.762047. Epub 2008 Aug 25.
PubMed 18725485Iqbal J, Sumaya W, Tatman V, Parviz Y, Morton AC, Grech ED, Campbell S, Storey RF, Gunn J. Incidence and predictors of stent thrombosis: a single-centre study of 5,833 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery stenting. EuroIntervention. 2013 May 20;9(1):62-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I1A10.
PubMed 23685296Guo N, Maehara A, Mintz GS, He Y, Xu K, Wu X, Lansky AJ, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, Brodie B, Kellett MA Jr, Dressler O, Parise H, Mehran R, Stone GW. Incidence, mechanisms, predictors, and clinical impact of acute and late stent malapposition after primary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an intravascular ultrasound substudy of the Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial. Circulation. 2010 Sep 14;122(11):1077-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.906040. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
PubMed 20805433Bangalore S, Amoroso N, Fusaro M, Kumar S, Feit F. Outcomes with various drug-eluting or bare metal stents in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a mixed treatment comparison analysis of trial level data from 34 068 patient-years of follow-up from randomized trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(4):378-90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000415. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
PubMed 23922145Otsuka F, Vorpahl M, Nakano M, Foerst J, Newell JB, Sakakura K, Kutys R, Ladich E, Finn AV, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. Pathology of second-generation everolimus-eluting stents versus first-generation sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in humans. Circulation. 2014 Jan 14;129(2):211-23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001790. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
PubMed 24163064Sianos G, Papafaklis MI, Daemen J, Vaina S, van Mieghem CA, van Domburg RT, Michalis LK, Serruys PW. Angiographic stent thrombosis after routine use of drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the importance of thrombus burden. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Aug 14;50(7):573-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.059. Epub 2007 Jul 30.
PubMed 17692740Grines CL, Cox DA, Stone GW, Garcia E, Mattos LA, Giambartolomei A, Brodie BR, Madonna O, Eijgelshoven M, Lansky AJ, O'Neill WW, Morice MC. Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999 Dec 23;341(26):1949-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199912233412601.
PubMed 10607811Haner JD, Rohla M, Losdat S, Iglesias JF, Muller O, Eeckhout E, Kurz D, Weilenmann D, Kaiser C, Tapponnier M, Roffi M, Heg D, Windecker S, Pilgrim T. Ultrathin-strut vs thin-strut drug-eluting stents for multi and single-stent lesions: A lesion-level subgroup analysis of 2 randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2023 Sep;263:73-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.05.004. Epub 2023 May 14.
PubMed 37192697Iglesias JF, Muller O, Losdat S, Roffi M, Kurz DJ, Weilenmann D, Kaiser C, Heg D, Windecker S, Pilgrim T. Complex primary percutaneous coronary intervention with ultrathin-strut biodegradable versus thin-strut durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A subgroup analysis from the BIOSTEMI randomized trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Mar;101(4):687-700. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30600. Epub 2023 Feb 19.
PubMed 36807456Iglesias JF, Muller O, Losdat S, Roffi M, Kurz DJ, Weilenmann D, Kaiser C, Heg D, Valgimigli M, Windecker S, Pilgrim T. Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention with thin-strut biodegradable versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A subgroup analysis of the BIOSTEMI randomized trial. Int J Cardiol. 2021 Jul 1;334:37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.04.034. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
PubMed 33887341
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Comparison of an Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02579031
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BIOSTEMI / 288/15
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndrome
- Keywords
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Stents, Drug-Eluting Stents, Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndrome
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,300 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Lausanne Hospitals
- Study start
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
PCI is considered as the reperfusion strategy of choice for patients with acute STEMI. Data from RCTs and meta-analyses demonstrate a consistent and strong signal towards a significant reduction in MACE among patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI with newer generation stents with enhanced biocompatibility.
The present trial aims at filling the current gap of evidence by providing randomized data to establish the superior clinical outcome with an ultrathin strut third-generation DES with biodegradable polymer designed to improve vascular healing in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, compared to the current state-of-the art second-generation DES with permanent polymer.
Detailed description
Background
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is considered nowadays as the reperfusion strategy of choice for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI, owing to a lower risk of myocardial re-infarction and improved short- and long-term survival compared to fibrinolysis. However, STEMI is still associated with poorer clinical outcomes after PCI, compared to stable CAD, with higher rates of stent thrombosis and an increased risk of myocardial re-infarction persisting throughout long-term follow-up. recent data from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses demonstrate a consistent and strong signal towards a significant reduction in major adverse cardiac events among patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI with third-generation DESs, compared with both first-generation and second-generation DESs with durable polymer. Importantly, this signal suggesting superiority of third-generation DESs in patients with STEMI has never been demonstrated with second-generation DESs. Third-generation DESs with enhanced biocompatibility may therefore have a particular clinical benefit in high-risk subgroups of patients with delayed vascular healing but these data warrants confirmation in appropriately designed randomized controlled trials.
Objective
The purpose of the study is to compare the safety and efficacy of a novel biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (Orsiro®) with a durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent (Xience Xpedition or Xience Alpine®) in a superiority trial among patients presenting with acute STEMI and undergoing primary PCI.
Methods
Eligible patients with acute STEMI presenting within 24 hours of symptom onset will undergo primary PCI. At PCI, the randomly allocated stent has to be implanted in the culprit lesion of the target vessel.
Patients will be followed-up with a hospital visit at 12 months. Patients will be followed-up for clinical endpoints by telephone at 30 days and 2 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Orsiro | Active comparator | Device: OrsiroNovel biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent Orsiro |
| Xience | Active comparator | Device: XienceDurable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent Xience |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age ≥18 years
- ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction
- Primary PCI occurring within 24 hours of symptom onset
- Presence of ≥1 acute infarct artery target vessel with one or more coronary artery stenoses in a native coronary artery from 2.25 to 4.0 mm in diameter that can be covered with one or multiple coronary stents
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Known allergy to aspirin, Ticagrelor, Prasugrel, Clopidogrel, Sirolimus, Everolimus or contrast media
- Planned surgery within 6 months of primary PCI, unless dual antiplatelet therapy could be maintained throughout the peri-surgical period
- Currently participating in another trial before reaching the primary endpoint
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Non-cardiac comorbid conditions with life expectancy of less than 1 year
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OrsiroNovel biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent used during primary percutaneous coronary intervention | Device | Orsiro |
| XienceDurable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent used during primary percutaneous coronary intervention | Device | Xience |
Primary outcome
Number of patients with target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (Q-wave and non-Q-wave), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization
Time frame: up to 12 months
7 secondary outcomes
Number of patients with clinically indicated and not clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (TLR)
Time frame: up to 30 days, 1 and 2 years
Number of patients with clinically indicated and not clinically indicated target vessel revascularization (TVR)
Time frame: up to 30 days, 1 and 2 years
Number of patients with target vessel failure (TVF)
Time frame: up to 30 days, 1 and 2 years
Number of patients with cardiac death
Time frame: up to 30 days, 1 and 2 years
Number of patients with all-cause death (cardiac and non-cardiac)
Time frame: up to 30 days, 1 and 2 years
Number of patients with myocardial infarction (Q-wave and non-Q-wave)
Time frame: up to 30 days, 1 and 2 years
Number of patients with definite stent thrombosis
Time frame: up to 30 days, 1 and 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Sep 2020.
- Results publication: PubMed 12517460Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003 Jan 4;361(9351):13-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12113-7.
- Results publication: PubMed 25173601Kolh P, Windecker S, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Juni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A; European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines; Zamorano JL, Achenbach S, Baumgartner H, Bax JJ, Bueno H, Dean V, Deaton C, Erol C, Fagard R, Ferrari R, Hasdai D, Hoes AW, Kirchhof P, Knuuti J, Kolh P, Lancellotti P, Linhart A, Nihoyannopoulos P, Piepoli MF, Ponikowski P, Sirnes PA, Tamargo JL, Tendera M, Torbicki A, Wijns W, Windecker S; EACTS Clinical Guidelines Committee; Sousa Uva M, Achenbach S, Pepper J, Anyanwu A, Badimon L, Bauersachs J, Baumbach A, Beygui F, Bonaros N, De Carlo M, Deaton C, Dobrev D, Dunning J, Eeckhout E, Gielen S, Hasdai D, Kirchhof P, Luckraz H, Mahrholdt H, Montalescot G, Paparella D, Rastan AJ, Sanmartin M, Sergeant P, Silber S, Tamargo J, ten Berg J, Thiele H, van Geuns RJ, Wagner HO, Wassmann S, Wendler O, Zamorano JL; Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery; European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Oct;46(4):517-92. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu366. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 20031664Kukreja N, Onuma Y, Garcia-Garcia H, Daemen J, van Domburg R, Serruys PW. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: long-term outcome after bare metal and drug-eluting stent implantation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Oct;1(2):103-10. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.787762. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 21251626Brodie B, Pokharel Y, Fleishman N, Bensimhon A, Kissling G, Hansen C, Milks S, Cooper M, McAlhany C, Stuckey T. Very late stent thrombosis after primary percutaneous coronary intervention with bare-metal and drug-eluting stents for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a 15-year single-center experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jan;4(1):30-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.11.004.
- Results publication: PubMed 24837256Loh JP, Pendyala LK, Kitabata H, Torguson R, Omar A, Minha S, Chen F, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Waksman R. Comparison of outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention among different coronary subsets (stable and unstable angina pectoris and ST-segment and non-ST-segment myocardial infarction). Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jun 1;113(11):1794-801. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 18725485Nakazawa G, Finn AV, Joner M, Ladich E, Kutys R, Mont EK, Gold HK, Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. Delayed arterial healing and increased late stent thrombosis at culprit sites after drug-eluting stent placement for acute myocardial infarction patients: an autopsy study. Circulation. 2008 Sep 9;118(11):1138-45. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.762047. Epub 2008 Aug 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 23685296Iqbal J, Sumaya W, Tatman V, Parviz Y, Morton AC, Grech ED, Campbell S, Storey RF, Gunn J. Incidence and predictors of stent thrombosis: a single-centre study of 5,833 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery stenting. EuroIntervention. 2013 May 20;9(1):62-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I1A10.
- Results publication: PubMed 20805433Guo N, Maehara A, Mintz GS, He Y, Xu K, Wu X, Lansky AJ, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, Brodie B, Kellett MA Jr, Dressler O, Parise H, Mehran R, Stone GW. Incidence, mechanisms, predictors, and clinical impact of acute and late stent malapposition after primary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an intravascular ultrasound substudy of the Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial. Circulation. 2010 Sep 14;122(11):1077-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.906040. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 23922145Bangalore S, Amoroso N, Fusaro M, Kumar S, Feit F. Outcomes with various drug-eluting or bare metal stents in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a mixed treatment comparison analysis of trial level data from 34 068 patient-years of follow-up from randomized trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(4):378-90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000415. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 24163064Otsuka F, Vorpahl M, Nakano M, Foerst J, Newell JB, Sakakura K, Kutys R, Ladich E, Finn AV, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. Pathology of second-generation everolimus-eluting stents versus first-generation sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in humans. Circulation. 2014 Jan 14;129(2):211-23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001790. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 17692740Sianos G, Papafaklis MI, Daemen J, Vaina S, van Mieghem CA, van Domburg RT, Michalis LK, Serruys PW. Angiographic stent thrombosis after routine use of drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the importance of thrombus burden. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Aug 14;50(7):573-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.059. Epub 2007 Jul 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 10607811Grines CL, Cox DA, Stone GW, Garcia E, Mattos LA, Giambartolomei A, Brodie BR, Madonna O, Eijgelshoven M, Lansky AJ, O'Neill WW, Morice MC. Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999 Dec 23;341(26):1949-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199912233412601.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thomas Pilgrim, Prof. Dr. med. principal investigator
Dep. of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital
10 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Orsiro and Xience in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndrome, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 10 sites in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 10 sites in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of patients with target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (Q-wave and non-Q-wave), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (time frame: up to 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02579031, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Sep 2020.