Bariatric SurgeryNCT02579798
Does Pulmonary Compliance Optimization Through PEEP Manipulations Reduces the Incidence of Postoperative Hypoxaemia in Bariatric Surgery?
A study testing PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure) in people with Bariatric Surgery, run by Brugmann University Hospital at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
General anesthesia, even in patients in good health, impairs gas exchanges and ventilatory mechanics. These effects result primarily from atelectasis formation. They occur in 85-90% of healthy patients in the minutes following the induction when a positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) is not used. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Bariatric Surgery
- What is being tested?
- PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- Jul 2013to Mar 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ASA score (American Society of Anesthesiologists ) of II or III
- BMI > 35 kg/m²
- Elective laparoscopic bariatric surgery: gastric bypass or sleeve
Who cannot join
- Restrictive (CPT <65%) or obstructive (VEMS/CV < 69%) chronic lung disease
- Increase of the intracranial pressure
- History of smoking with chronic obstructive disease (VEMS/CV)
- Active tabagism
- Ongoing pregnancy
- History of heart failure (NYHA III or IV) or coronary artery disease
Show all 9Show fewer
- Urgent surgery
- Allergy to a drug used within the study
- Lack of written informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
General anesthesia, even in patients in good health, impairs gas exchanges and ventilatory mechanics. These effects result primarily from atelectasis formation. They occur in 85-90% of healthy patients in the minutes following the induction when a positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) is not used.
The functional residual capacity (FRC) of obese patients during general anesthesia is even smaller than the one of healthy patients. There is a direct relationship between the body mass index and the decrease of the functional residual capacity. Obese patients have therefore more atelectasis. The increased abdominal pressure during the pneumoperitoneum will increase the decrease of the CRF, and thus aggravate the formation of these atelectasis.
Read more
Atelectasis affect the peroperative gas exchanges and are likely to be involved in the worsening of postoperative hypoxemia episodes. In addition, atelectasis alter the clearance of secretions and the lymph flow, which predispose to lung infections.Taking all these factors into account, it is logical to think that the atelectasis presence can lead to an increase of the postsurgical morbidity (respiratory distress, infections). That is why actively fighting against the formation of these atelectasis is important.
There is a lack of scientific evidence to say that the strategies against atelectasis as PEEP have a significant impact on the patient's postoperative status. The expected clinical benefits balance (reduction of respiratory distress episodes, infections and mortality) versus the risks linked to the maneuvers done to reduce the development of atelectasis (barotraumas, cardiac complications) remains to be determined.
The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of two different alveolar recruitment strategies on the incidence of postoperative hypoxemia in obese patients after bariatric surgery.
The secondary objectives of this study are to compare the number of recruitment maneuvers, the Pa02 / FI02 ratio (ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen), the dynamic compliance, the anatomic dead space and intraoperative PaCO2-EtCO2 gradient (arterial and end tidal gradient) between two alveolar recruitment strategies applied in obese patients during laparoscopic bariatric surgery (gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy).
The tertiary objectives of this study are to report the number of respiratory complications and postoperative wound infections at the 30th postoperative day.
Read the detailed description
General anesthesia, even in patients in good health, impairs gas exchanges and ventilatory mechanics. These effects result primarily from atelectasis formation. They occur in 85-90% of healthy patients in the minutes following the induction when a positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) is not used.
These atelectasis are formed on one hand by the reduction of the functional residual capacity (FRC) following a compression mechanism (loss of the inspiratory muscle tone, which is accompanied by a chest wall configuration change and a diaphragm cephalic movement) and on the other hand by a denitrogenation absorption process (ventilation at high Fi02 (oxygen inspired fraction) causing complete absorption of O2 with lack of support for the alveolus, which then collapses).
The FRC of obese patients during general anesthesia is even smaller than the one of healthy patients. There is a direct relationship between the body mass index and the decrease of the functional residual capacity. Obese patients have therefore more atelectasis. The increased abdominal pressure during the pneumoperitoneum will increase the decrease of the CRF, and thus aggravate the formation of these atelectasis.
Atelectasis affect the peroperative gas exchanges and are likely to be involved in the worsening of postoperative hypoxemia episodes. In addition, atelectasis alter the clearance of secretions and the lymph flow, which predispose to lung infections.Taking all these factors into account, it is logical to think that the atelectasis presence can lead to an increase of the postsurgical morbidity (respiratory distress, infections). That is why actively fighting against the formation of these atelectasis is important.
Several strategies have been studied in order to improve respiratory mechanics and reduce impaired gas exchange during laparoscopic surgery in obese patients. The position called "chair", mechanical ventilation with PEEP, recruitment maneuvers followed by the PEEP, and spontaneous ventilation with CPAP before extubation, are all strategies that have proven effective to decrease development these atelectasis.
Currently, the scientific community agrees on the fact that PEEP improves intraoperative respiratory function (improved compliance, oxygenation) especially in conjunction with recruitment maneuvers.
But there is a lack of scientific evidence to say that the strategies against atelectasis as PEEP have a significant impact on the patient's postoperative status. The expected clinical benefits balance (reduction of respiratory distress episodes, infections and mortality) versus the risks linked to the maneuvers done to reduce the development of atelectasis (barotraumas, cardiac complications) remains to be determined.
The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of two different alveolar recruitment strategies on the incidence of postoperative hypoxemia in obese patients after bariatric surgery.
The secondary objectives of this study are to compare the number of recruitment maneuvers, the Pa02 / FI02 ratio, the dynamic compliance, the anatomic dead space and intraoperative PaCO2-EtCO2 gradient between two alveolar recruitment strategies applied in obese patients during laparoscopic bariatric surgery (gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy).
The tertiary objectives of this study are to report the number of respiratory complications and postoperative wound infections at the 30th postoperative day.
- Conditions
- Bariatric Surgery
- Being tested
- PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure)
- Keywords
- Bariatric surgery, Post-surgery hypoxemia, Obesity
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure)Device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PEEP 10 cmH20 | Experimental | In this group, a PEEP of 10 cmH20 is applied for the duration of the intervention and a recruitment maneuver is applied each time the SpO2 (oxygen pulsated saturation) drops below 95%. Receives: Device: PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure) |
| optimal PEEP | Active comparator | In this group, 10 cmH20 PEEP is applied immediately. Then the "optimal PEEP" is sought at three key moments. It is determined by the best value of lung compliance found in the patient. It is sought by increasing or decreasing the value of the PEEP by increments or decrements of 2 cmH20. If after 6 respiratory cycles, the value of the compliance is increased, the investigator continues to increase the value of the PEEP. On the other hand, if the value of compliance is reduced, the investigator reduces the value of PEEP. The value of the PEEP selected shall in no event exceed the set pressure range (maximum pressure plate of 30 cmH20 and maximum inspiratory peak pressure 40cmH20). A recruitment maneuver is applied each time the SpO2 drops below 95%, as in the PEEP 10cmH2O group. Receives: Device: PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of hypoxemia episodes (Sp02<90%)
This will be monitored by a portable saturometer (OxyTrue A, Bluepoint, Germany). This saturometer will allow the investigators to count the number of hypoxemia episodes (Sp02<90%) and their duration in obese patients, in the postoperative period.
Measured: continuously during 48h after surgery
Number of hypoxemia episodes (Sp02<95%)
This will be monitored by a portable saturometer (OxyTrue A, Bluepoint, Germany). This saturometer will allow the investigators to count the number of hypoxemia episodes (Sp02<95%) and their duration in obese patients, in the postoperative period.
Measured: continuously during 48h after surgery
Secondary outcomes (60)
Number of recruitment manoeuvers
Recruitment manoeuver are performed if patient saturation drops below 95%.
Measured: From the beginning of the surgery till moment 1 (after induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitoneum)
Number of recruitment manoeuvers
Recruitment manoeuver are performed if patient saturation drops below 95%.
Measured: From moment 1 till moment 2 (after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation)
Number of recruitment manoeuvers
Recruitment manoeuver are performed if patient saturation drops below 95%.
Measured: From moment 2 till moment 3 (after pneumoperitoneum exsufflation - patient lying flat)
Number of recruitment manoeuvers
Recruitment manoeuver are performed if patient saturation drops below 95%.
Measured: From moment 3 till the end of the surgery (patient leaving the theater)
Pulmonary dynamic compliance (Cd) - preoperative
This will be determined by the following formula: Cd = Vt/P(peak)-PEEP and expressed in mL/cmH2O
Measured: Just before surgery, at ambient air contact
Pulmonary dynamic compliance (Cd) - moment 1
This will be determined by the following formula: Cd = Vt/P(peak)-PEEP and expressed in mL/cmH2O
Measured: just after the anesthesia induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitory
Pulmonary dynamic compliance (Cd) -moment 2
This will be determined by the following formula: Cd = Vt/P(peak)-PEEP and expressed in mL/cmH2O
Measured: just after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation
Pulmonary dynamic compliance (Cd) -moment 3
This will be determined by the following formula: Cd = Vt/P(peak)-PEEP and expressed in mL/cmH2O
Measured: just after pneumoperitoneum exsufflation - patient lying flat
Pulmonary dynamic compliance (Cd) -if recruitment manoeuvers
This will be determined by the following formula: Cd = Vt/P(peak)-PEEP and expressed in mL/cmH2O
Measured: Five minutes after any recruitment manoeuver
Anatomic dead space - preoperative
This will be determined by this formula: VD = VT (1-PEtCO2/PaC02)
Measured: Just before surgery, at ambient air contact
Anatomic dead space -moment 1
This will be determined by this formula: VD = VT (1-PEtCO2/PaC02)
Measured: just after the anesthesia induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitory
Anatomic dead space -moment 2
This will be determined by this formula: VD = VT (1-PEtCO2/PaC02)
Measured: just after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation
Anatomic dead space -moment 3
This will be determined by this formula: VD = VT (1-PEtCO2/PaC02)
Measured: just after pneumoperitoneum exsufflation - patient lying flat
Anatomic dead space -if recruitment manoeuvers
This will be determined by this formula: VD = VT (1-PEtCO2/PaC02)
Measured: Five minutes after any recruitment manoeuver
PaO2/FiO2 ratio - preoperative
Arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen ratio
Measured: Just before surgery, at ambient air contact
PaO2/FiO2 ratio - moment 1
Arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen ratio
Measured: just after the anesthesia induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitory
PaO2/FiO2 ratio - moment 2
Arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen ratio
Measured: just after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation
PaO2/FiO2 ratio - moment 3
Arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen ratio
Measured: just after pneumoperitoneum exsufflation - patient lying flat
PaO2/FiO2 ratio - if recruitment manoeuvers
Arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen ratio
Measured: Five minutes after any recruitment manoeuver
PaCO2-EtCO2 gradient - preoperative
The gradient between the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the arterial blood (PaCO2) and the CO2 end-tidal partial pressure (EtCO2) is used to evaluate the effectiveness of alveolar recruitment.
Measured: Just before surgery, at ambient air contact
PaCO2-EtCO2 gradient - moment 1
The gradient between the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the arterial blood (PaCO2) and the CO2 end-tidal partial pressure (EtCO2) is used to evaluate the effectiveness of alveolar recruitment.
Measured: just after the anesthesia induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitory
PaCO2-EtCO2 gradient - moment 2
The gradient between the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the arterial blood (PaCO2) and the CO2 end-tidal partial pressure (EtCO2) is used to evaluate the effectiveness of alveolar recruitment.
Measured: just after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation
PaCO2-EtCO2 gradient - moment 3
The gradient between the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the arterial blood (PaCO2) and the CO2 end-tidal partial pressure (EtCO2) is used to evaluate the effectiveness of alveolar recruitment.
Measured: just after pneumoperitoneum exsufflation - patient lying flat
PaCO2-EtCO2 gradient - if recruitment manoeuvers
The gradient between the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the arterial blood (PaCO2) and the CO2 end-tidal partial pressure (EtCO2) is used to evaluate the effectiveness of alveolar recruitment.
Measured: Five minutes after any recruitment manoeuver
Number of respiratory complications
Number of hospitalisations due to respiratory complications within 30 days after surgery.
Measured: 30 days after surgery
Number of postoperative wound infections
All patients are seen at the surgical consultation on day 30 after surgery. The anamnesis performed during that consultation enables the investigators to identify patients with wound infections (defined as a need for local or oral antibiotics, additional hospitalisation or abnormal cicatrisation).
Measured: 30 days after surgery
Pre-operative physiologic measures: cardiac frequency (FC)
The hemodynamic and respiratory parameters of the patient are measured by means of a Datex-Ohmeda Acertys machine (Aisys type).
Measured: Just before surgery, at ambient air contact
Pre-operative physiologic measures: Arterial tension (TA)
The hemodynamic and respiratory parameters of the patient are measured by means of a Datex-Ohmeda Acertys machine (Aisys type).
Measured: Just before surgery, at ambient air contact
Pre-operative physiologic measures: pH
The hemodynamic and respiratory parameters of the patient are measured by means of a Datex-Ohmeda Acertys machine (Aisys type).
Measured: Just before surgery, at ambient air contact
Pre-operative physiologic measures: partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the arterial blood (PaCO2)
The gasometric parameters of the patient are analyzed with a Rapidlab 1265 machine (Siemens).
Measured: Just before surgery, at ambient air contact
Operative physiologic measures - moment 1: FC
The hemodynamic and respiratory parameters of the patient are measured by means of a Datex-Ohmeda Acertys machine (Aisys type).
Measured: just after induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitoneum
Operative physiologic measures - moment 1: PAM (Average arterial pressure)
The hemodynamic and respiratory parameters of the patient are measured by means of a Datex-Ohmeda Acertys machine (Aisys type).
Measured: just after induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitoneum
Operative physiologic measures - moment 1: pH
The hemodynamic and respiratory parameters of the patient are measured by means of a Datex-Ohmeda Acertys machine (Aisys type).
Measured: just after induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitoneum
Operative physiologic measures - moment 1: PaCO2
The gasometric parameters of the patient are analyzed with a Rapidlab 1265 machine (Siemens)
Measured: just after induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitoneum
Operative physiologic measures - moment 1: CO2
The gasometric parameters of the patient are analyzed with a Rapidlab 1265 machine (Siemens)
Measured: just after induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitoneum
Operative physiologic measures - moment 2: FC
The hemodynamic and respiratory parameters of the patient are measured by means of a Datex-Ohmeda Acertys machine (Aisys type).
Measured: just after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation
Operative physiologic measures - moment 2: PAM
The hemodynamic and respiratory parameters of the patient are measured by means of a Datex-Ohmeda Acertys machine (Aisys type).
Measured: just after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation
Operative physiologic measures - moment 2: pH
The hemodynamic and respiratory parameters of the patient are measured by means of a Datex-Ohmeda Acertys machine (Aisys type).
Measured: just after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation
Operative physiologic measures - moment 2: PaCO2
The gasometric parameters of the patient are analyzed with a Rapidlab 1265 machine (Siemens)
Measured: just after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation
Operative physiologic measures - moment 2: CO2
The gasometric parameters of the patient are analyzed with a Rapidlab 1265 machine (Siemens)
Measured: just after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation
Operative physiologic measures - moment 3: FC
The hemodynamic and respiratory parameters of the patient are measured by means of a Datex-Ohmeda Acertys machine (Aisys type).
Measured: just after pneumoperitoneum exsufflation - patient lying flat
Operative physiologic measures - moment 3: PAM
The hemodynamic and respiratory parameters of the patient are measured by means of a Datex-Ohmeda Acertys machine (Aisys type).
Measured: just after pneumoperitoneum exsufflation - patient lying flat
Operative physiologic measures - moment 3: pH
The hemodynamic and respiratory parameters of the patient are measured by means of a Datex-Ohmeda Acertys machine (Aisys type).
Measured: just after pneumoperitoneum exsufflation - patient lying flat
Operative physiologic measures - moment 3: CO2
The gasometric parameters of the patient are analyzed with a Rapidlab 1265 machine (Siemens)
Measured: just after pneumoperitoneum exsufflation - patient lying flat
Operative physiologic measures - moment 3: PaCO2
The gasometric parameters of the patient are analyzed with a Rapidlab 1265 machine (Siemens)
Measured: just after pneumoperitoneum exsufflation - patient lying flat
Operative physiologic measures - if recruitment manoeuvers occurs: FC
The hemodynamic and respiratory parameters of the patient are measured by means of a Datex-Ohmeda Acertys machine (Aisys type).
Measured: Five minutes after any recruitment manoeuver
Operative physiologic measures - if recruitment manoeuvers occurs: PAM
The hemodynamic and respiratory parameters of the patient are measured by means of a Datex-Ohmeda Acertys machine (Aisys type).
Measured: Five minutes after any recruitment manoeuver
Operative physiologic measures - if recruitment manoeuvers occurs: SpO2
The gasometric parameters of the patient are analyzed with a Rapidlab 1265 machine (Siemens)
Measured: Five minutes after any recruitment manoeuver
Operative physiologic measures - if recruitment manoeuvers occurs: pH
The hemodynamic and respiratory parameters of the patient are measured by means of a Datex-Ohmeda Acertys machine (Aisys type).
Measured: Five minutes after any recruitment manoeuver
Operative physiologic measures - if recruitment manoeuvers occurs: PaCO2
The gasometric parameters of the patient are analyzed with a Rapidlab 1265 machine (Siemens)
Measured: Five minutes after any recruitment manoeuver
Operative physiologic measures - if recruitment manoeuvers occurs: PaO2
The gasometric parameters of the patient are analyzed with a Rapidlab 1265 machine (Siemens)
Measured: Five minutes after any recruitment manoeuver
Operative physiologic measures - if recruitment manoeuvers occurs: CO2
The gasometric parameters of the patient are analyzed with a Rapidlab 1265 machine (Siemens)
Measured: Five minutes after any recruitment manoeuver
Pre-operative physiologic measures: partial pressure of oxygen in the arterial blood (PaO2)
The gasometric parameters of the patient are analyzed with a Rapidlab 1265 machine (Siemens)
Measured: Just before surgery, at ambient air contact
Operative physiologic measures - moment 1: PaO2
The gasometric parameters of the patient are analyzed with a Rapidlab 1265 machine (Siemens)
Measured: just after induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitoneum
Operative physiologic measures - moment 2: PaO2
The gasometric parameters of the patient are analyzed with a Rapidlab 1265 machine (Siemens)
Measured: just after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation
Operative physiologic measures - moment 3: PaO2
The gasometric parameters of the patient are analyzed with a Rapidlab 1265 machine (Siemens)
Measured: just after pneumoperitoneum exsufflation - patient lying flat
Pre-operative physiologic measures: Oxygen Pulsated Saturation (SpO2)
The gasometric parameters of the patient are analyzed with a Rapidlab 1265 machine (Siemens)
Measured: Just before surgery, at ambient air contact
Operative physiologic measures - moment 1: SpO2
The gasometric parameters of the patient are analyzed with a Rapidlab 1265 machine (Siemens)
Measured: just after induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitoneum
Operative physiologic measures - moment 2: SpO2
The gasometric parameters of the patient are analyzed with a Rapidlab 1265 machine (Siemens)
Measured: just after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation
Operative physiologic measures - moment 3: SpO2
The gasometric parameters of the patient are analyzed with a Rapidlab 1265 machine (Siemens)
Measured: just after pneumoperitoneum exsufflation - patient lying flat
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2013
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionMar 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bariatric SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Brugmann University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Philippe VAN DER LINDEN, Brugmann University Hospital
- Investigators
- Philippe Van der Linden, MD, Principal investigator, CHU BrugmannVan Hecke Delphine, MD, Principal investigator, CHU Brugmann
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02579798
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHUB-CRF
- Status last verified
- Jan 2018
- First submitted
- 12 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 19 Jan 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Coussa M, Proietti S, Schnyder P, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Prevention of atelectasis formation during the induction of general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2004 May;98(5):1491-5, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000111743.61132.99.
PubMed 15105237Imberger G, McIlroy D, Pace NL, Wetterslev J, Brok J, Moller AM. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during anaesthesia for the prevention of mortality and postoperative pulmonary complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Sep 8;(9):CD007922. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007922.pub2.
PubMed 20824871Eichenberger A, Proietti S, Wicky S, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Morbid obesity and postoperative pulmonary atelectasis: an underestimated problem. Anesth Analg. 2002 Dec;95(6):1788-92, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200212000-00060.
PubMed 12456460Whalen FX, Gajic O, Thompson GB, Kendrick ML, Que FL, Williams BA, Joyner MJ, Hubmayr RD, Warner DO, Sprung J. The effects of the alveolar recruitment maneuver and positive end-expiratory pressure on arterial oxygenation during laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jan;102(1):298-305. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000183655.57275.7a.
PubMed 16368847Futier E, Constantin JM, Pelosi P, Chanques G, Kwiatkoskwi F, Jaber S, Bazin JE. Intraoperative recruitment maneuver reverses detrimental pneumoperitoneum-induced respiratory effects in healthy weight and obese patients undergoing laparoscopy. Anesthesiology. 2010 Dec;113(6):1310-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fc640a.
PubMed 21068660Almarakbi WA, Fawzi HM, Alhashemi JA. Effects of four intraoperative ventilatory strategies on respiratory compliance and gas exchange during laparoscopic gastric banding in obese patients. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;102(6):862-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep084. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
PubMed 19403595Reinius H, Jonsson L, Gustafsson S, Sundbom M, Duvernoy O, Pelosi P, Hedenstierna G, Freden F. Prevention of atelectasis in morbidly obese patients during general anesthesia and paralysis: a computerized tomography study. Anesthesiology. 2009 Nov;111(5):979-87. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b87edb.
PubMed 19809292Pelosi P, Ravagnan I, Giurati G, Panigada M, Bottino N, Tredici S, Eccher G, Gattinoni L. Positive end-expiratory pressure improves respiratory function in obese but not in normal subjects during anesthesia and paralysis. Anesthesiology. 1999 Nov;91(5):1221-31. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199911000-00011.
PubMed 10551570Tusman G, Bohm SH, Suarez-Sipmann F, Turchetto E. Alveolar recruitment improves ventilatory efficiency of the lungs during anesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 2004 Aug-Sep;51(7):723-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03018433.
PubMed 15310643Maisch S, Reissmann H, Fuellekrug B, Weismann D, Rutkowski T, Tusman G, Bohm SH. Compliance and dead space fraction indicate an optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure after recruitment in anesthetized patients. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jan;106(1):175-81, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000287684.74505.49.
PubMed 18165575Strang CM, Hachenberg T, Freden F, Hedenstierna G. Development of atelectasis and arterial to end-tidal PCO2-difference in a porcine model of pneumoperitoneum. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Aug;103(2):298-303. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep102. Epub 2009 May 13.
PubMed 19443420Gander S, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Positive end-expiratory pressure during induction of general anesthesia increases duration of nonhypoxic apnea in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2005 Feb;100(2):580-584. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000143339.40385.1B.
PubMed 15673897Hans GA, Sottiaux TM, Lamy ML, Joris JL. Ventilatory management during routine general anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Jan;26(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b000e000000f1fb.
PubMed 19122544Mercat A, Richard JC, Vielle B, Jaber S, Osman D, Diehl JL, Lefrant JY, Prat G, Richecoeur J, Nieszkowska A, Gervais C, Baudot J, Bouadma L, Brochard L; Expiratory Pressure (Express) Study Group. Positive end-expiratory pressure setting in adults with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008 Feb 13;299(6):646-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.6.646.
PubMed 18270353Gattinoni L, Carlesso E, Brazzi L, Caironi P. Positive end-expiratory pressure. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010 Feb;16(1):39-44. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283354723.
PubMed 19996966
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jan 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Does Pulmonary Compliance Optimization Through PEEP Manipulations Reduces the Incidence of Postoperative Hypoxaemia in Bariatric Surgery?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02579798
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CHUB-CRF
- Conditions
- Bariatric Surgery
- Keywords
- Bariatric surgery, Post-surgery hypoxemia, Obesity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Brugmann University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2013
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
General anesthesia, even in patients in good health, impairs gas exchanges and ventilatory mechanics. These effects result primarily from atelectasis formation. They occur in 85-90% of healthy patients in the minutes following the induction when a positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) is not used.
The functional residual capacity (FRC) of obese patients during general anesthesia is even smaller than the one of healthy patients. There is a direct relationship between the body mass index and the decrease of the functional residual capacity. Obese patients have therefore more atelectasis. The increased abdominal pressure during the pneumoperitoneum will increase the decrease of the CRF, and thus aggravate the formation of these atelectasis.
Atelectasis affect the peroperative gas exchanges and are likely to be involved in the worsening of postoperative hypoxemia episodes. In addition, atelectasis alter the clearance of secretions and the lymph flow, which predispose to lung infections.Taking all these factors into account, it is logical to think that the atelectasis presence can lead to an increase of the postsurgical morbidity (respiratory distress, infections). That is why actively fighting against the formation of these atelectasis is important.
There is a lack of scientific evidence to say that the strategies against atelectasis as PEEP have a significant impact on the patient's postoperative status. The expected clinical benefits balance (reduction of respiratory distress episodes, infections and mortality) versus the risks linked to the maneuvers done to reduce the development of atelectasis (barotraumas, cardiac complications) remains to be determined.
The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of two different alveolar recruitment strategies on the incidence of postoperative hypoxemia in obese patients after bariatric surgery.
The secondary objectives of this study are to compare the number of recruitment maneuvers, the Pa02 / FI02 ratio (ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen), the dynamic compliance, the anatomic dead space and intraoperative PaCO2-EtCO2 gradient (arterial and end tidal gradient) between two alveolar recruitment strategies applied in obese patients during laparoscopic bariatric surgery (gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy).
The tertiary objectives of this study are to report the number of respiratory complications and postoperative wound infections at the 30th postoperative day.
Detailed description
General anesthesia, even in patients in good health, impairs gas exchanges and ventilatory mechanics. These effects result primarily from atelectasis formation. They occur in 85-90% of healthy patients in the minutes following the induction when a positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) is not used.
These atelectasis are formed on one hand by the reduction of the functional residual capacity (FRC) following a compression mechanism (loss of the inspiratory muscle tone, which is accompanied by a chest wall configuration change and a diaphragm cephalic movement) and on the other hand by a denitrogenation absorption process (ventilation at high Fi02 (oxygen inspired fraction) causing complete absorption of O2 with lack of support for the alveolus, which then collapses).
The FRC of obese patients during general anesthesia is even smaller than the one of healthy patients. There is a direct relationship between the body mass index and the decrease of the functional residual capacity. Obese patients have therefore more atelectasis. The increased abdominal pressure during the pneumoperitoneum will increase the decrease of the CRF, and thus aggravate the formation of these atelectasis.
Atelectasis affect the peroperative gas exchanges and are likely to be involved in the worsening of postoperative hypoxemia episodes. In addition, atelectasis alter the clearance of secretions and the lymph flow, which predispose to lung infections.Taking all these factors into account, it is logical to think that the atelectasis presence can lead to an increase of the postsurgical morbidity (respiratory distress, infections). That is why actively fighting against the formation of these atelectasis is important.
Several strategies have been studied in order to improve respiratory mechanics and reduce impaired gas exchange during laparoscopic surgery in obese patients. The position called "chair", mechanical ventilation with PEEP, recruitment maneuvers followed by the PEEP, and spontaneous ventilation with CPAP before extubation, are all strategies that have proven effective to decrease development these atelectasis.
Currently, the scientific community agrees on the fact that PEEP improves intraoperative respiratory function (improved compliance, oxygenation) especially in conjunction with recruitment maneuvers.
But there is a lack of scientific evidence to say that the strategies against atelectasis as PEEP have a significant impact on the patient's postoperative status. The expected clinical benefits balance (reduction of respiratory distress episodes, infections and mortality) versus the risks linked to the maneuvers done to reduce the development of atelectasis (barotraumas, cardiac complications) remains to be determined.
The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of two different alveolar recruitment strategies on the incidence of postoperative hypoxemia in obese patients after bariatric surgery.
The secondary objectives of this study are to compare the number of recruitment maneuvers, the Pa02 / FI02 ratio, the dynamic compliance, the anatomic dead space and intraoperative PaCO2-EtCO2 gradient between two alveolar recruitment strategies applied in obese patients during laparoscopic bariatric surgery (gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy).
The tertiary objectives of this study are to report the number of respiratory complications and postoperative wound infections at the 30th postoperative day.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PEEP 10 cmH20 | Experimental | Device: PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure)In this group, a PEEP of 10 cmH20 is applied for the duration of the intervention and a recruitment maneuver is applied each time the SpO2 (oxygen pulsated saturation) drops below 95%. |
| optimal PEEP | Active comparator | Device: PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure)In this group, 10 cmH20 PEEP is applied immediately. Then the "optimal PEEP" is sought at three key moments. It is determined by the best value of lung compliance found in the patient. It is sought by increasing or decreasing the value of the PEEP by increments or decrements of 2 cmH20. If after 6 respiratory cycles, the value of the compliance is increased, the investigator continues to increase the value of the PEEP. On the other hand, if the value of compliance is reduced, the investigator reduces the value of PEEP. The value of the PEEP selected shall in no event exceed the set pressure range (maximum pressure plate of 30 cmH20 and maximum inspiratory peak pressure 40cmH20). A recruitment maneuver is applied each time the SpO2 drops below 95%, as in the PEEP 10cmH2O group. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- ASA score (American Society of Anesthesiologists ) of II or III
- BMI > 35 kg/m²
- Elective laparoscopic bariatric surgery: gastric bypass or sleeve
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Restrictive (CPT <65%) or obstructive (VEMS/CV < 69%) chronic lung disease
- Increase of the intracranial pressure
- History of smoking with chronic obstructive disease (VEMS/CV)
- Active tabagism
- Ongoing pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure) | Device | PEEP 10 cmH20, optimal PEEP |
Primary outcome
Number of hypoxemia episodes (Sp02<90%)
Time frame: continuously during 48h after surgery
This will be monitored by a portable saturometer (OxyTrue A, Bluepoint, Germany). This saturometer will allow the investigators to count the number of hypoxemia episodes (Sp02<90%) and their duration in obese patients, in the postoperative period.
Number of hypoxemia episodes (Sp02<95%)
Time frame: continuously during 48h after surgery
This will be monitored by a portable saturometer (OxyTrue A, Bluepoint, Germany). This saturometer will allow the investigators to count the number of hypoxemia episodes (Sp02<95%) and their duration in obese patients, in the postoperative period.
60 secondary outcomes
Number of recruitment manoeuvers
Time frame: From the beginning of the surgery till moment 1 (after induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitoneum)
Number of recruitment manoeuvers
Time frame: From moment 1 till moment 2 (after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation)
Number of recruitment manoeuvers
Time frame: From moment 2 till moment 3 (after pneumoperitoneum exsufflation - patient lying flat)
Number of recruitment manoeuvers
Time frame: From moment 3 till the end of the surgery (patient leaving the theater)
Pulmonary dynamic compliance (Cd) - preoperative
Time frame: Just before surgery, at ambient air contact
Pulmonary dynamic compliance (Cd) - moment 1
Time frame: just after the anesthesia induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitory
Pulmonary dynamic compliance (Cd) -moment 2
Time frame: just after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation
Pulmonary dynamic compliance (Cd) -moment 3
Time frame: just after pneumoperitoneum exsufflation - patient lying flat
Pulmonary dynamic compliance (Cd) -if recruitment manoeuvers
Time frame: Five minutes after any recruitment manoeuver
Anatomic dead space - preoperative
Time frame: Just before surgery, at ambient air contact
Anatomic dead space -moment 1
Time frame: just after the anesthesia induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitory
Anatomic dead space -moment 2
Time frame: just after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation
Anatomic dead space -moment 3
Time frame: just after pneumoperitoneum exsufflation - patient lying flat
Anatomic dead space -if recruitment manoeuvers
Time frame: Five minutes after any recruitment manoeuver
PaO2/FiO2 ratio - preoperative
Time frame: Just before surgery, at ambient air contact
PaO2/FiO2 ratio - moment 1
Time frame: just after the anesthesia induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitory
PaO2/FiO2 ratio - moment 2
Time frame: just after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation
PaO2/FiO2 ratio - moment 3
Time frame: just after pneumoperitoneum exsufflation - patient lying flat
PaO2/FiO2 ratio - if recruitment manoeuvers
Time frame: Five minutes after any recruitment manoeuver
PaCO2-EtCO2 gradient - preoperative
Time frame: Just before surgery, at ambient air contact
PaCO2-EtCO2 gradient - moment 1
Time frame: just after the anesthesia induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitory
PaCO2-EtCO2 gradient - moment 2
Time frame: just after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation
PaCO2-EtCO2 gradient - moment 3
Time frame: just after pneumoperitoneum exsufflation - patient lying flat
PaCO2-EtCO2 gradient - if recruitment manoeuvers
Time frame: Five minutes after any recruitment manoeuver
Number of respiratory complications
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
Number of postoperative wound infections
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
Pre-operative physiologic measures: cardiac frequency (FC)
Time frame: Just before surgery, at ambient air contact
Pre-operative physiologic measures: Arterial tension (TA)
Time frame: Just before surgery, at ambient air contact
Pre-operative physiologic measures: pH
Time frame: Just before surgery, at ambient air contact
Pre-operative physiologic measures: partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the arterial blood (PaCO2)
Time frame: Just before surgery, at ambient air contact
Operative physiologic measures - moment 1: FC
Time frame: just after induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitoneum
Operative physiologic measures - moment 1: PAM (Average arterial pressure)
Time frame: just after induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitoneum
Operative physiologic measures - moment 1: pH
Time frame: just after induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitoneum
Operative physiologic measures - moment 1: PaCO2
Time frame: just after induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitoneum
Operative physiologic measures - moment 1: CO2
Time frame: just after induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitoneum
Operative physiologic measures - moment 2: FC
Time frame: just after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation
Operative physiologic measures - moment 2: PAM
Time frame: just after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation
Operative physiologic measures - moment 2: pH
Time frame: just after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation
Operative physiologic measures - moment 2: PaCO2
Time frame: just after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation
Operative physiologic measures - moment 2: CO2
Time frame: just after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jan 2018.
- Background: PubMed 15105237Coussa M, Proietti S, Schnyder P, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Prevention of atelectasis formation during the induction of general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2004 May;98(5):1491-5, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000111743.61132.99.
- Background: PubMed 20824871Imberger G, McIlroy D, Pace NL, Wetterslev J, Brok J, Moller AM. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during anaesthesia for the prevention of mortality and postoperative pulmonary complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Sep 8;(9):CD007922. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007922.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 12456460Eichenberger A, Proietti S, Wicky S, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Morbid obesity and postoperative pulmonary atelectasis: an underestimated problem. Anesth Analg. 2002 Dec;95(6):1788-92, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200212000-00060.
- Background: PubMed 16368847Whalen FX, Gajic O, Thompson GB, Kendrick ML, Que FL, Williams BA, Joyner MJ, Hubmayr RD, Warner DO, Sprung J. The effects of the alveolar recruitment maneuver and positive end-expiratory pressure on arterial oxygenation during laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jan;102(1):298-305. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000183655.57275.7a.
- Background: PubMed 21068660Futier E, Constantin JM, Pelosi P, Chanques G, Kwiatkoskwi F, Jaber S, Bazin JE. Intraoperative recruitment maneuver reverses detrimental pneumoperitoneum-induced respiratory effects in healthy weight and obese patients undergoing laparoscopy. Anesthesiology. 2010 Dec;113(6):1310-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fc640a.
- Background: PubMed 19403595Almarakbi WA, Fawzi HM, Alhashemi JA. Effects of four intraoperative ventilatory strategies on respiratory compliance and gas exchange during laparoscopic gastric banding in obese patients. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;102(6):862-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep084. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
- Background: PubMed 19809292Reinius H, Jonsson L, Gustafsson S, Sundbom M, Duvernoy O, Pelosi P, Hedenstierna G, Freden F. Prevention of atelectasis in morbidly obese patients during general anesthesia and paralysis: a computerized tomography study. Anesthesiology. 2009 Nov;111(5):979-87. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b87edb.
- Background: PubMed 10551570Pelosi P, Ravagnan I, Giurati G, Panigada M, Bottino N, Tredici S, Eccher G, Gattinoni L. Positive end-expiratory pressure improves respiratory function in obese but not in normal subjects during anesthesia and paralysis. Anesthesiology. 1999 Nov;91(5):1221-31. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199911000-00011.
- Background: PubMed 15310643Tusman G, Bohm SH, Suarez-Sipmann F, Turchetto E. Alveolar recruitment improves ventilatory efficiency of the lungs during anesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 2004 Aug-Sep;51(7):723-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03018433.
- Background: PubMed 18165575Maisch S, Reissmann H, Fuellekrug B, Weismann D, Rutkowski T, Tusman G, Bohm SH. Compliance and dead space fraction indicate an optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure after recruitment in anesthetized patients. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jan;106(1):175-81, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000287684.74505.49.
- Background: PubMed 19443420Strang CM, Hachenberg T, Freden F, Hedenstierna G. Development of atelectasis and arterial to end-tidal PCO2-difference in a porcine model of pneumoperitoneum. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Aug;103(2):298-303. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep102. Epub 2009 May 13.
- Background: PubMed 15673897Gander S, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Positive end-expiratory pressure during induction of general anesthesia increases duration of nonhypoxic apnea in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2005 Feb;100(2):580-584. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000143339.40385.1B.
Related trials for Bariatric Surgery
Active, not recruiting
Comparing 150cm OAGB With 150cm Biliopancreatic Limb RYGB. A Non-inferiority Trial
Bariatric Surgery Candidate, Obesity
Active, not recruiting
Mindfulness Based Eating Awareness Training for Bariatric Surgery Patients
Obesity, Morbid, Eating Disorder Symptom
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Oxytocin for Respiratory Compromise and Hypoventilation Induced by Drugs
Obesity & Overweight, Respiratory Depression
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Non-Invasive MASLD Diagnosis & T2D Remission Biomarkers
MASLD, T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Active, not recruiting
Stepwise PEEP vs Sustained Inflation in Bariatric Surgery Patients
Recruitment, Bariatric Surgery Candidate
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Philippe Van der Linden, MD principal investigator
CHU Brugmann
Van Hecke Delphine, MD principal investigator
CHU Brugmann
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure) in people with Bariatric Surgery, run by Brugmann University Hospital at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of hypoxemia episodes (Sp02<90%) (time frame: continuously during 48h after surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02579798, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jan 2018.