Adenoma, Liver CellPhase 2NCT02582034
Internal Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinomas With Therasphere: Optimized Dosimetry Versus Standard Dosimetry
A Phase 2 study testing Optimized Internal Radiation Therapy and Standard Internal Radiation Therapy in people with Adenoma, Liver Cell, run by Center Eugene Marquis at 4 sites in France.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a treatment with Therasphere which is optimized is more efficient compared to a standard treatment for patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinomas. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Adenoma, Liver Cell
- What is being tested?
- Optimized Internal Radiation Therapy and Standard Internal Radiation Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 56 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Dec 2015to Dec 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18,
- Written free and informed consent,
- Histologically demonstrated Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), not a candidate for surgery or local ablative treatment (radio frequency, etc.)
- Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification A, B or C,
- At least one lesion ≥ 7 cm,
- Hepatic reserve (hepatic parenchyma not treated) after the first SIRT ≥ 30%,
Show all 19Show fewer
- Unilateral involvement, minimal bilateral involvement allowed only with a hepatic reserve ≥ 30% after SIRT
- Child A classification only, or B but with bilirubinemia <35 micromol/L,
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1,
- Patients whose biological parameters meet the following criteria:
- Hemoglobin ≥ 8.5 g/dL,
- Granulocytes ≥ 1500/mm3,
- Platelets ≥ 50,000/mm3,
- Bilirubinemia <35 micromol per liter,
- Transaminases ≤ five times the upper limit of normal,
- Creatininemia ≤ 1.5 times the normal upper limit,
- Expected survival over 12 weeks,
- Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing age,
- If sorafenib has been taken the diagnostic angiogram must follow it by at least four weeks after its stop.
Who cannot join
- HCC operable or accessible to a local ablative treatment (radio frequency),
- Hepatectomy history unless a segmental treatment is considered, with a hepatic reserve ≥ 30% after SIRT,
- Prior treatment with sorafenib unless stopped at least four weeks earlier,
- History of chemo-embolization of the principal lesion, except in case of nodular residual lesion measuring at least 7 cm or in case of progression after initial response,
- Bilateral disease requiring a whole liver injection or with a hepatic reserve < 30% after SIRT
- Treatment of another cancer less than one year earlier,
Show all 13Show fewer
- Extra-hepatic metastases other than adenopathies of the hilum smaller than 2 cm,
- >70% tumor invasion of the liver,
- Bilirubinemia ≥ 35 µmol/L,
- A Severe underlying biliary pathology:
- Bile duct anomaly (stent, dilation) Cirrhosis of biliary origin,
- Women of childbearing age without contraception
- Pregnant or nursing women
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
France4 sites
CHU Henri Mondor
Créteil, 94000
CHU Saint Eloi
Montpellier, 34925
Centre Eugène Marquis
Rennes, 35042
Gustave Roussy
Villejuif
About this study
Official title: Selective Internal Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinomas With Yttrium-90 Loaded Microspheres: Optimized Dosimetry Versus Standard Dosimetry
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a treatment with Therasphere which is optimized is more efficient compared to a standard treatment for patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinomas.
Read the detailed description
For patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma, a palliative treatment can be proposed if tumor expansion is limited to the liver. One of palliative treatment is the the Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) with Therasphere®. This treatment is made secure by performing a diagnostic angiogram coupled with a hepatic perfusion scintigraph with which patients at risk of complications are identified and excluded. The treatment objective, with the standard dosimetric approach, is to deliver an absorbed dose of 120 ± 20 Gy to the treated hepatic volume, most often one lobe. Recent retrospective trials show that an optimized dosimetric approach, considering the dose absorbed by the tumor, is technically achievable and would probably make it possible to obtain a better effectiveness. In our experience, treatment personalisation have been described to be used for 60% of the patients with a tumor larger than 7 cm underlying the clinical impact of this new approach.
- Conditions
- Adenoma, Liver Cell
- Being tested
- Optimized Internal Radiation Therapy, Standard Internal Radiation Therapy
- Keywords
- Optimized Dosimetry versus standard Dosimetry, Internal Radiation Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Adenoma, Liver Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Optimized Internal Radiation TherapyRadiation
Injection of yttrium-90 microspheres (TheraSphere®) is performed during the therapeutic angiogram, directly into the hepatic artery (left or right, or even segmental).
Optimized dosimetry arm: the activity to be administered is calculated so as to deliver predictive dosimetry:
- An absorbed dose to the tumor of at least ≥ 205 Gy and if possible exceeding 250 Gy or even 300 Gy
- A dose at the treated healthy liver < 120 Gy in case of lobar treatment
- Dose to the treated healthy liver can exceed 120 Gy in case of segmental treatment and hepatic reserve > 30%
- A pulmonary dose < 30 Gy for one treatment and < 50 Gy in cumulative dose in case of multiple treatments.
Standard Internal Radiation TherapyRadiation
Injection of yttrium-90 microspheres (TheraSphere®) is performed during the therapeutic angiogram, directly into the hepatic artery (left or right, or even segmental).Standard dosimetry arm: the activity to be administered is calculated so as predictive dosimetry:
- An absorbed dose of 120 ± 20 Gy to the treated volume (whatever the tumor absorbed dose)
- A pulmonary dose < 30 Gy for one treatment and < 50 Gy in cumulative dose in case of multiple treatments.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard dosimetry | Active comparator | Standard Internal Radiation Therapy : Dose of radiation delivered to the tumoral volume is fixed : 120 Gray (GY) Receives: Radiation: Standard Internal Radiation Therapy |
| Optimized dosimetry | Experimental | Optimized Internal Radiation Therapy : Dose of radiation absorbed by the tumor is > 205 GY, if possible 250 or 300 Gy. Receives: Radiation: Optimized Internal Radiation Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary endpoint is to compare the response rate of the treated lesion at the first radioembolization, evaluated using European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria of yttrium-90 marked glass microspheres SIRT
Measured: 3 months after treatment administration
Secondary outcomes (5)
Progression Free Survival
Measured: Up to 12 months
Overall survival
Measured: Up to 30 months after inclusion of the 1st patient
Related Adverse Events in both arms as assessed by National Cancer Institute criteria (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, (NCI CTCAE) version 4).
Measured: Up to 12 months
Progression free survival not accessible to SIRT
Measured: Up to 12 months after treatment administration
Post-therapeutic dosimetry measured by Positron emission tomography-computed tomography PET / CT
Dose delivered to the treated liver, the tumors, healthy liver and lings
Measured: Day one of treatment administration
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2015
- Primary completionDec 2018
- Study completionDec 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Adenoma, Liver CellStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Center Eugene Marquis
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Etienne GARIN, Pr, Study chair, Centre Eugène Marquis
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02582034
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DOSISPHERES-01
- Status last verified
- Jan 2019
- First submitted
- 9 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 31 Jan 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Garin E, Tselikas L, Guiu B, Chalaye J, Rolland Y, de Baere T, Assenat E, Tacher V, Palard X, Deandreis D, Mariano-Goulart D, Amaddeo G, Boudjema K, Hollebecque A, Meerun MA, Regnault H, Vibert E, Campillo-Gimenez B, Edeline J. Long-Term Overall Survival After Selective Internal Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinomas: Updated Analysis of DOSISPHERE-01 Trial. J Nucl Med. 2024 Feb 1;65(2):264-269. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266211.
PubMed 38212068Garin E, Tselikas L, Guiu B, Chalaye J, Edeline J, de Baere T, Assenat E, Tacher V, Robert C, Terroir-Cassou-Mounat M, Mariano-Goulart D, Amaddeo G, Palard X, Hollebecque A, Kafrouni M, Regnault H, Boudjema K, Grimaldi S, Fourcade M, Kobeiter H, Vibert E, Le Sourd S, Piron L, Sommacale D, Laffont S, Campillo-Gimenez B, Rolland Y; DOSISPHERE-01 Study Group. Personalised versus standard dosimetry approach of selective internal radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (DOSISPHERE-01): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jan;6(1):17-29. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30290-9. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
PubMed 33166497
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Selective Internal Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinomas With Yttrium-90 Loaded Microspheres: Optimized Dosimetry Versus Standard Dosimetry
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02582034
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DOSISPHERES-01
- Conditions
- Adenoma, Liver Cell
- Keywords
- Optimized Dosimetry versus standard Dosimetry, Internal Radiation Therapy
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Center Eugene MarquisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a treatment with Therasphere which is optimized is more efficient compared to a standard treatment for patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinomas.
Detailed description
For patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma, a palliative treatment can be proposed if tumor expansion is limited to the liver. One of palliative treatment is the the Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) with Therasphere®. This treatment is made secure by performing a diagnostic angiogram coupled with a hepatic perfusion scintigraph with which patients at risk of complications are identified and excluded. The treatment objective, with the standard dosimetric approach, is to deliver an absorbed dose of 120 ± 20 Gy to the treated hepatic volume, most often one lobe. Recent retrospective trials show that an optimized dosimetric approach, considering the dose absorbed by the tumor, is technically achievable and would probably make it possible to obtain a better effectiveness. In our experience, treatment personalisation have been described to be used for 60% of the patients with a tumor larger than 7 cm underlying the clinical impact of this new approach.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard dosimetry | Active comparator | Radiation: Standard Internal Radiation TherapyStandard Internal Radiation Therapy : Dose of radiation delivered to the tumoral volume is fixed : 120 Gray (GY) |
| Optimized dosimetry | Experimental | Radiation: Optimized Internal Radiation TherapyOptimized Internal Radiation Therapy : Dose of radiation absorbed by the tumor is > 205 GY, if possible 250 or 300 Gy. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Age ≥ 18,
- Written free and informed consent,
- Histologically demonstrated Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), not a candidate for surgery or local ablative treatment (radio frequency, etc.)
- Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification A, B or C,
- At least one lesion ≥ 7 cm,
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- HCC operable or accessible to a local ablative treatment (radio frequency),
- Hepatectomy history unless a segmental treatment is considered, with a hepatic reserve ≥ 30% after SIRT,
- Prior treatment with sorafenib unless stopped at least four weeks earlier,
- History of chemo-embolization of the principal lesion, except in case of nodular residual lesion measuring at least 7 cm or in case of progression after initial response,
- Bilateral disease requiring a whole liver injection or with a hepatic reserve < 30% after SIRT
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Optimized Internal Radiation TherapyInjection of yttrium-90 microspheres (TheraSphere®) is performed during the therapeutic angiogram, directly into the hepatic artery (left or right, or even segmental). Optimized dosimetry arm: the activity to be administered is calculated so as to deliver predictive dosimetry: * An absorbed dose to the tumor of at least ≥ 205 Gy and if possible exceeding 250 Gy or even 300 Gy * A dose at the treated healthy liver < 120 Gy in case of lobar treatment * Dose to the treated healthy liver can exceed 120 Gy in case of segmental treatment and hepatic reserve > 30% * A pulmonary dose < 30 Gy for one treatment and < 50 Gy in cumulative dose in case of multiple treatments. | Radiation | Optimized dosimetry |
| Standard Internal Radiation TherapyInjection of yttrium-90 microspheres (TheraSphere®) is performed during the therapeutic angiogram, directly into the hepatic artery (left or right, or even segmental).Standard dosimetry arm: the activity to be administered is calculated so as predictive dosimetry: * An absorbed dose of 120 ± 20 Gy to the treated volume (whatever the tumor absorbed dose) * A pulmonary dose < 30 Gy for one treatment and < 50 Gy in cumulative dose in case of multiple treatments. | Radiation | Standard dosimetry |
Primary outcome
The primary endpoint is to compare the response rate of the treated lesion at the first radioembolization, evaluated using European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria of yttrium-90 marked glass microspheres SIRT
Time frame: 3 months after treatment administration
5 secondary outcomes
Progression Free Survival
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Overall survival
Time frame: Up to 30 months after inclusion of the 1st patient
Related Adverse Events in both arms as assessed by National Cancer Institute criteria (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, (NCI CTCAE) version 4).
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Progression free survival not accessible to SIRT
Time frame: Up to 12 months after treatment administration
Post-therapeutic dosimetry measured by Positron emission tomography-computed tomography PET / CT
Time frame: Day one of treatment administration
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jan 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38212068Garin E, Tselikas L, Guiu B, Chalaye J, Rolland Y, de Baere T, Assenat E, Tacher V, Palard X, Deandreis D, Mariano-Goulart D, Amaddeo G, Boudjema K, Hollebecque A, Meerun MA, Regnault H, Vibert E, Campillo-Gimenez B, Edeline J. Long-Term Overall Survival After Selective Internal Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinomas: Updated Analysis of DOSISPHERE-01 Trial. J Nucl Med. 2024 Feb 1;65(2):264-269. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266211.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33166497Garin E, Tselikas L, Guiu B, Chalaye J, Edeline J, de Baere T, Assenat E, Tacher V, Robert C, Terroir-Cassou-Mounat M, Mariano-Goulart D, Amaddeo G, Palard X, Hollebecque A, Kafrouni M, Regnault H, Boudjema K, Grimaldi S, Fourcade M, Kobeiter H, Vibert E, Le Sourd S, Piron L, Sommacale D, Laffont S, Campillo-Gimenez B, Rolland Y; DOSISPHERE-01 Study Group. Personalised versus standard dosimetry approach of selective internal radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (DOSISPHERE-01): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jan;6(1):17-29. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30290-9. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
Related trials for Adenoma, Liver Cell
RecruitingPhase 2
18F-Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor ([18F]FAPI-74) PET Imaging for Cancer Detection
Sarcoma, Small Cell Lung Cancer or Extrapulmonary Neuroendocrine Cancer (EP-NEC)
RecruitingObservational study
Frequency and Clinical Phenotype of BAP1 Hereditary Predisposition Syndrome
Uveal Melanoma, Cutaneous Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study of MDX2001 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
Biliary Tract Cancer, Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
FOG-001 in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Cancer, Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
FAPI PET Imaging - An Exploratory Study
Thyroid Pathology, Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Etienne GARIN, Pr study chair
Centre Eugène Marquis
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Optimized Internal Radiation Therapy and Standard Internal Radiation Therapy in people with Adenoma, Liver Cell, run by Center Eugene Marquis at 4 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 19 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary endpoint is to compare the response rate of the treated lesion at the first radioembolization, evaluated using European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria of yttrium-90 marked glass microspheres SIRT (time frame: 3 months after treatment administration). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02582034, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2019.