AzTrials
AzTrials

Weight LossEndominaNCT02582229

A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of an Endoluminal-suturing Device (Endomina TM) as an Aid for Endoscopic Gastric Reduction.

A study testing Endomina in people with Weight Loss, run by Erasme University Hospital at 3 sites in 3 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Surgery is the only effective treatment for morbid obesity and can be divided into restrictive surgeries (Lap Band and Sleeve gastrectomy), malabsorptive surgeries (Biliary pancreatic deviation and duodenal switch) or a combination of both (RYGBP). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 64 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Weight Loss
What is being tested?
Endomina
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
3 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
Nov 2015to Jul 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 64 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 21-64 years;
  • BMI between 30 to 40 kg/m²
  • Must be able to comply with all study requirements for the duration of the study as outlined in the protocol. This includes complying with the visit schedule as well as study specific procedures such as: clinical assessment, endoscopy, radiography, as well as laboratory investigations.
  • Must be able to understand and be willing to provide written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Achalasia and any other esophageal motility disorders
  • Heart diseases: unstable angina, myocardial infarction within the past year, or heart disease classified within the New York Heart Association's Class III or IV functional capacity.
  • Hypertension: uncontrolled hypertension during last 3 month
  • Severe renal, hepatic, pulmonary disease or cancer;
  • GI stenosis or obstruction
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Impending gastric surgery 60 days post intervention;
  • Currently participating in other study

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 3 countries.

3 sites in 3 countries

Belgium1 site
  • Gastroenterology Department Erasme Hospital

    Brussels, 1070

Other trials in Belgium

Czechia1 site
  • Internal cilic - department of Gastroenterology - University Hospital

    Ostrava, 70800

Other trials in Czechia

Italy1 site
  • U.O. Endoscopia Digestiva Chirurgica

    Roma, 00168

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Surgery is the only effective treatment for morbid obesity and can be divided into restrictive surgeries (Lap Band and Sleeve gastrectomy), malabsorptive surgeries (Biliary pancreatic deviation and duodenal switch) or a combination of both (RYGBP).

This later technique is the most common and most effective surgical procedure performed worldwide and has been processed to be an effective treatment of morbid obesity and its complications, achieving excess weight loss of 65 to 80 % ; 1-2 years after surgery (1,2).

Read more

Vertical gastric plication is a novel surgical approach for reducing the stomach capacity. Anterior surface plication and greater curvature plication are variations of vertical gastric plication that reduce the gastric capacity through infolding of the anterior surface or greater curvature of the stomach, respectively. These approaches have been tested, with positive results (3,4).

A transoral or endoluminal approach (ie, a procedure that requires no incision, because access is granted through the mouth) offers the potential for additional benefit to the patient, because the procedures continue to become more and more minimally invasive.

Advances in endoluminal devices are now allowing clinicians the ability to begin exploring bariatric procedures performed via flexible endoscopy. Although these procedures may not be as effective as their surgical counterparts, these less-invasive options may relieve patients of the significant risks associated with surgery (5).

Read the detailed description

Endomina (Endo Tools Therapeutics, Nivelles, Belgium) is CE mark robot driven device that may be attached to an endoscope inside the body and allows remote manipulation of the arms of devices during a peroral intervention. It offers the possibilities of making transoral surgical full thickness sutures and may allow performing, via a transoral route.

After a first trial on pigs (safety) we did a second trial on human. This trial included 11 patients treated with the same technique. There were no complications and the short term results were encouraging.

Study design:

Prospective, non-randomized, interventional, open-label, multi-center efficacy study.

Objectives:

Study to evaluate the efficacy of an endoluminal vertical gastroplasty (EVG) using an endoluminal-suturing device. In the literature the efficacy of an endoluminal technique is defined as a loss of weight of 25% excess weight loss (EWL) sustained at 1 year (6).

Endpoints Secondary endpoint: Efficacy Information on efficacy will be obtained by measurements of total weight loss and excess weight loss during 12 months Secondary endpoint: Safety Safety will be characterized by the incidence of all Adverse Device Effects (ADEs), non-serious and serious, possibly related to or related to the procedure and/or device that are experienced by study participants.

In addition, safety assessments will be determined based on physical examination (vital signs) and laboratory tests during scheduled visits. Safety evaluations will also be performed to ensure no subsequent adverse events have occurred and to ensure any adverse events during the trial that are considered on-going are stable or have resolved. Safety will be assessed at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months following the intervention.

Sample size •40 patients will be enrolled Based on the result of our previous study, with a beta power of 80% and an alpha error of 5%, the number of patient needed to detect a 25% EWL reduction at one year is 34. Considering a lost to follow-up of 10%, 40 patients is required.

Study duration:

•6 months of enrolment and 12 months of follow up Overall design This will be a prospective, non-randomized, open-label, multi-center, interventional, efficacy study.

A period of approximately 6 months is anticipated form the time the first patient is enrolled to the completion of the last patient. There will be no randomization in this study.

Once baseline eligibility criteria have been met all patients will undergo the same treatment protocol. A subject will be considered "enrolled" if he/she has signed the informed consent, passed all screening criteria and has undergone a procedure.

Criteria for discontinuation If a subject discontinues participation in the study, he or she will be contacted in order to obtain information about the reason(s) for discontinuation and collection of any potential AEs. The Investigator will document the reason for Subject Withdrawal on the Patient Case Report Form (CRF). Discontinued patients will be followed until all AEs resolve or until the Investigator decides that follow-up are no longer necessary.

Study Design:

Devices used during the protocol In addition to Endomina device (provided as companionate by Endotools Options) any other required endoscopic accessories can be used during the procedure.

Point of enrollment A subject will be considered "enrolled" if he/she has signed the informed consent, passed all screening criteria and has agreed to the procedure.

Study duration and number of subjects A period of approximately 6 months is anticipated form the time the time the first patient is enrolled to the completion of the last patient.

Lab tests and other screening procedures can occur as early as 30 days prior to scheduled procedure.

The participants will be followed as follow:

  • Day (-1): Admission
  • Day (0): Procedure
  • Day (+1): Clinical Follow up and discharge (i.e. if no adverse effects observed)
  • 1 month: Clinical assessment
  • 3 month: Follow up endoscopy, Clinical assessment
  • 6 month: Clinical assessment
  • 12 month: Clinical and endoscopic assessment On Parallel a nutritional specialist will monitor the patient on quarterly basis (1,3,6,12).

Study procedures The intervention will be performed under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation. Endomina will be introduced into the stomach over guide wires and then fixed to the endoscope. The procedure will include the placement of 4-6 transmural anterior-posterior sutures after argon plasma coagulation of the tissue opposition areas in order to ensure persistence of the pouch reduction. Patient will be kept overnight after the procedure.

Conditions
Weight Loss
Being tested
Endomina
Medical subject headings
Weight Loss

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EndominaDevice

    The intervention will be performed under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation. Endomina will be introduced into the stomach over guide wires and then fixed to the endoscope. The procedure will include the placement of 4-6 transmural anterior-posterior sutures after argon plasma coagulation of the tissue opposition areas in order to ensure persistence of the pouch reduction. Patient will be kept overnight after the procedure.

Study groups in NCT02582229
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionnalExperimentalThe intervention will be performed under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation. Endomina will be introduced into the stomach over guide wires and then fixed to the endoscope. The procedure will include the placement of 4-6 transmural anterior-posterior sutures after argon plasma coagulation of the tissue opposition areas in order to ensure persistence of the pouch reduction. Patient will be kept overnight after the procedure.
Receives: Device: Endomina

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Weight Loss

    Weight loss - Excess Weight Loss - BMI

    Measured: one year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Complications

    Vital signs - Pain - Bleeding - Perforation - other

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Oct 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2015
  3. Primary completionJul 2016
  4. Study completionJul 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02582229
Sponsor's protocol ID
P2015/432
Acronym
Endomina
Status last verified
Sep 2016
First submitted
16 Oct 2015
Last updated
13 Sep 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Jensen MD, Pories W, Fahrbach K, Schoelles K. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004 Oct 13;292(14):1724-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.14.1724.

    PubMed 15479938
  • Magro DO, Geloneze B, Delfini R, Pareja BC, Callejas F, Pareja JC. Long-term weight regain after gastric bypass: a 5-year prospective study. Obes Surg. 2008 Jun;18(6):648-51. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9265-1. Epub 2008 Apr 8.

    PubMed 18392907
  • Fogel R, De Fogel J, Bonilla Y, De La Fuente R. Clinical experience of transoral suturing for an endoluminal vertical gastroplasty: 1-year follow-up in 64 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Jul;68(1):51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.061. Epub 2008 Mar 19.

    PubMed 18355825
  • Paxton JH, Matthews JB. The cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2005 Jan;15(1):24-34. doi: 10.1381/0960892052993477.

    PubMed 15760496
  • Huberty V, Machytka E, Boskoski I, Barea M, Costamagna G, Deviere J. Endoscopic gastric reduction with an endoluminal suturing device: a multicenter prospective trial with 1-year follow-up. Endoscopy. 2018 Dec;50(12):1156-1162. doi: 10.1055/a-0630-1224. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

    PubMed 29906810

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Endomina in people with Weight Loss, run by Erasme University Hospital at 3 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Belgium, Czechia, Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Weight Loss (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02582229, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in