AzTrials
AzTrials

Malignant Pleural EffusionNCT02583282

A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Intrapleural Doxycycline Versus Iodopovidone for Performing Pleurodesis in Malignant Pleural Effusion

A study testing Doxycycline and Iodopovidine in people with Malignant Pleural Effusion, run by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh at 1 site in India.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) arises in advanced-stages of malignancies and frequently heralds a poor prognosis.If the underlying malignancy is chemo sensitive (e.g., small-cell carcinoma of lung \& lymphoma), systemic chemotherapy may control the pleural effusion. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Malignant Pleural Effusion
What is being tested?
Doxycycline and Iodopovidine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
1 Aug 2015to 31 Mar 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • recurrent symptomatic malignant pleural effusion, with subjective improvement of dyspnea following thoracentesis

Who cannot join

  • history of any allergy to iodine or doxycycline
  • history of thyroid disorders
  • failure of lung expansion after insertion of intercostal tube (trapped lung)
  • presence of air leaks
  • advanced malignancy with limited predicted life expectancy (<30 days)
  • failure to provide informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

India1 site
  • Bronchoscopy suite, PGIMER

    Chandigarh, 160012

Other trials in India

About this study

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) arises in advanced-stages of malignancies and frequently heralds a poor prognosis.If the underlying malignancy is chemo sensitive (e.g., small-cell carcinoma of lung \& lymphoma), systemic chemotherapy may control the pleural effusion. Instilling of sclerosing agents into the pleural cavity (pleurodesis) is a common method for the management of MPE. According to a recent survey, tetracycline or its derivative (doxycycline) is the preferred agent for performing pleurodesis at many centers. In a previous study from the investigators' center, the investigators have demonstrated equal efficacy of iodopovidone in comparison to talc in inducing pleural symphysis. Also, iodopovidone has been postulated to have anti-neoplastic effects and hence may help in reducing the drain output. Apart from these benefits iodopovidone is easily available and is cost effective. The investigators believe that iodopovidone will have better efficacy than doxycycline in inducing pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusion.

Read the detailed description

Introduction \& Review of literature Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) arises in advanced-stages of malignancies and frequently heralds a poor prognosis. Most patients with MPE are symptomatic. The most common symptom is exertional dyspnea. Most patients undergo chemotherapy or local treatments to palliate symptoms such as dyspnea, cough \& chest pain, to improve quality of life. If the underlying malignancy is chemo sensitive (e.g., small-cell carcinoma of lung \& lymphoma), systemic chemotherapy may control the pleural effusion.1 However, when pleural effusion persists or reaccumulates after chemotherapy, the management of refractory MPE includes local therapeutic methods such as thoracentesis, pleurodesis, pleurectomy, or pleuroperitoneal shunting. Instilling of sclerosing agents into the pleural cavity (pleurodesis) is a common method for the management of MPE. For several years, various agents such as anti-neoplastics (e.g., nitrogen mustard, bleomycin), tetracycline derivatives, talc, erythromycin, silver nitrate, and povidone-iodine have been injected into the pleural cavity to create pleurodesis.

According to a recent survey, tetracycline or its derivative (doxycycline) is the preferred agent for performing pleurodesis at many centers.7 However, intravenous preparation of doxycycline is not freely available and also induces severe inflammation in the pleura that results in severe chest pain and discomfort to the patient. In a previous study from the investigators' center, the investigators have demonstrated equal efficacy of iodopovidine in comparison to talc in inducing pleural symphysis.8 Also, iodopovidine has been postulated to have anti-neoplastic effects and hence may help in reducing the drain output. Apart from these benefits iodopovidine is easily available and is cost effective. The investigators believe that iodopovidone will have better efficacy than doxycycline in inducing pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusion.

Study hypothesis In patients with malignant pleural effusion, pleurodesis with intrapleural instillation of iodopovidone will have better efficacy in comparison with doxycycline.

Methods

Study design: This will be a randomized double blind study conducted in the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, PGIMER, Chandigarh.

Selection of cases: A total of 100 consecutive patients of malignant pleural effusion will be enrolled in the study. Patients will be equally randomized to undergo pleurodesis, either with intrapleural iodopovidone or intrapleural doxycycline. A written informed consent will be taken from all the patients participating in the present study

Randomization: Patient will be randomized 1:1 to undergo pleurodesis either by instillation of intrapleural iodopovidone or intrapleural doxycycline. The randomization sequence will be computer generated. The sequence generated will be kept in a sealed opaque envelope and will be opened at the time of procedure

Procedure: A chest tube (24-28 F) will be inserted through the fifth intercostal space in the mid-axillary line, to achieve complete drainage of the effusion and/or complete lung expansion. In case of large effusions, drainage will be spread over 24-48 h to prevent re-expansion pulmonary oedema. Pleurodesis will be performed when the daily drainage output will decrease to <150 mL/day and chest radiograph demonstrates apposition of pleural surfaces. In cases of pneumothorax, complete lung expansion and absence of any air leaks will be confirmed before instillation of the chemical agent. A chest radiograph will be performed to confirm complete re-expansion. Normal saline solution (50 mL) containing lignocaine (2 mg/kg ideal body weight) will be infused through the chest tube. Simultaneously, tramadol (100 mg) will be administered intravenously for analgesia. After 15 minutes pleurodesis will be performed either by instillation of doxycycline or by iodopovidone.

Doxycycline: 500 mg of doxycycline will be dissolved in 50 ml of normal saline. The combination will then be instilled through the chest tube in the pleural cavity and the chest tube drain will be clamped for 4 hours.

Iodopovidone: 20 ml of 10% betadine (Microshield, Johnson and Johnson, Solan, India) will be dissolved in 80 mL of normal saline. The combination will then be instilled through the chest tube in the pleural cavity and the chest tube drain will be clamped for 4 hours.

The chest tube will be flushed with 50 mL of normal saline after instillation of study drug (doxycycline or iodopovidone).

Endpoint: The chest tube will be removed if the drainage output is less than 100mL of pleural fluid and there is complete lung re-expansion with no residual pneumothorax on chest radiograph. Pulse, blood pressure, respiratory rate and temperature will be measured before and every 30 minutes after the procedure for 6 hours. Chest pain after pleurodesis will be recorded on a visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0-100 mm. Patients will be given additional intravenous tramadol (50 mg) on an as-needed basis after the procedure. Any complications related to the procedure will be recorded. Complications such as hypotension, fever, acute respiratory failure and empyema will be noted. Patients will be followed up at 1 week, at 1, 3 and 6 months.

Being tested
Doxycycline, Iodopovidine
Medical subject headings
Pleural Effusion, Malignant

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DoxycyclineOther

    500 mg of doxycycline will be dissolved in 50 ml of normal saline. The combination will then be instilled through the chest tube in the pleural cavity and the chest tube drain will be clamped for 4 hours.

  • IodopovidineOther

    20 ml of 10% betadine (Microshield, Johnson and Johnson, Solan, India) will be dissolved in 80 mL of normal saline. The combination will then be instilled through the chest tube in the pleural cavity and the chest tube drain will be clamped for 4 hours.

Study groups in NCT02583282
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DoxycyclineExperimentalIntrapleural doxycycline
Receives: Other: Doxycycline
IodopovidineActive comparatorIntrapleural iodopovidine
Receives: Other: Iodopovidine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Complete success

    long-term relief of symptoms related to the effusion, with absence of re-accumulation of fluid on chest radiograph at 30 days

    Measured: 30 days

  2. Partial success

    diminution of dyspnea related to the effusion, with only partial reaccumulation of fluid and no requirement for therapeutic thoracentesis

    Measured: 30 days

  3. Failed pleurodesis

    reaccumulation of pleural fluid requiring therapeutic thoracentesis, persistence of drainage output >250mL/day requiring repeat procedure, lack of success requiring surgical intervention

    Measured: 30 days

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Time to pleurodesis

    interval between instillation of the agent and removal of the chest tube

    Measured: 1 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Oct 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Aug 2015
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2020
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02583282
Sponsor's protocol ID
INT/IEC/2015/232
Status last verified
Oct 2022
First submitted
4 Aug 2015
Last updated
6 Oct 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Damaraju V, Sehgal IS, Muthu V, Prasad KT, Dhooria S, Aggarwal AN, Agarwal R. Efficacy and safety of doxycycline versus iodopovidone for pleurodesis through an intercostal tube in malignant pleural effusions: a randomized trial. Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jul 10;31(8):454. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07932-y.

    PubMed 37428348

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Doxycycline and Iodopovidine in people with Malignant Pleural Effusion, run by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Complete success (time frame: 30 days). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02583282, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in