Disorder of Maxillary SinusNCT02583737
Comparative Study Between Lyophilized or Frozen Bone Allografts for Sinus-lifting
A study testing freeze bone allograft and lyophilized bone allograft in people with Disorder of Maxillary Sinus and Accessory; Bone, run by University of Sao Paulo.
Trial summary
Bone resorption and atrophy in maxillary posterior region is due to severe periodontal disease and is consequent tooth extractions. Sinus pneumatisation can occur after tooth extraction and alveolar bone loss. Consequently, bone-reducing volume at that region is a great challenge to implantodontists. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Disorder of Maxillary Sinus, Accessory; Bone, Bone Atrophy
- What is being tested?
- freeze bone allograft and lyophilized bone allograft
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jun 2014to Dec 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- healthy
- totally or partially edentulous patients, bilaterally, in upper premolar or molar region; presenting maxillary sinus lifting necessity with bilateral alveolar bone height lower than 5mm and indication for at least one osseointegrated dental implant in premolar or molar region.
Who cannot join
- recent sinusitis history
- hypersensibility for sinus allergens, tabagism, ethylism
- severe periodontal disease, diabetes, hypertension.
- Cases that occur schneiderian membrane perforation will be excluded from the final sample.
About this study
Official title: Histological and Microtomographic Comparative Study Between Lyophilized or Frozen Bone Allografts for Sinus-lifting: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Bone resorption and atrophy in maxillary posterior region is due to severe periodontal disease and is consequent tooth extractions. Sinus pneumatisation can occur after tooth extraction and alveolar bone loss. Consequently, bone-reducing volume at that region is a great challenge to implantodontists. Sinus lifting surgery have been practiced since 80's and many biomaterials have been used to solve filling issues to maintain the sinus floor lifted in a position that can allow dental implants installation. Bone grafts have shown to be the best choice of filling grafts. Despite autologous bone are the gold standard filling biomaterial it is associates with great mortality and morbidity. So, bone allografts from tissue bank had been shown to be an advantageous alternative. Lyophilized or freeze tissue bone are the most common allografts but literature is poor in randomized controlled parallel clinical trials regarding those filling grafts for sinus lifting. The aim of this study is to perform a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing two bone allografts: lyophilized and freeze bone allografts from human bone tissue bank. The investigators want to verify which one can develop greater osteogenesis, if is there any difference between them regarding the architectural trabeculae formation, if there are different patterns of reabsorption and finally if is there any differences between them regarding primary and lately dental implants stability. To answer those questions the investigators propose firstly, to carry out microtomographic and histological analysis from trephine bone samples after six months of sinus lifting and grafting in healthy participants undergoing osseointegrated dental implants. Secondly, the primary and lately implant stability is going to be achieved employing Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA).
- Conditions
- Disorder of Maxillary Sinus, Accessory; Bone, Bone Atrophy
- Being tested
- freeze bone allograft, lyophilized bone allograft
- Keywords
- bone, maxillary sinus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
freeze bone allograftProcedure or surgery
sinus lifting filling procedure employing freeze bone allograft from tissue bone bank.
lyophilized bone allograftProcedure or surgery
sinus lifting filling procedure employing lyophilized bone allograft from tissue bone bank.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| group lyophilized bone allograft | Active comparator | sinus lifting with tissue bank lyophilized bone filling Receives: Procedure: lyophilized bone allograft |
| group freeze bone allograft | Active comparator | sinus lifting with freeze bone bank filling Receives: Procedure: freeze bone allograft |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
volume of bone neoformation in mm3
computational software for analysis the micro CT scanning of trephine bone samples images
Measured: six months after grafting
area of bone neoformation in μm2
IMAGEJ histomorphometric software for analysis of trephine bone samples micrographic images
Measured: six months after grafting
Secondary outcomes (2)
dental implants stability value
primary implant stability by Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) in ISQ
Measured: six months after grafting
dental implants stability value
late stability by Resonance Frequency analysis (RFA) in ISQ
Measured: six months after dental implant
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2014
- Primary completionDec 2016 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2016 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Disorder of Maxillary SinusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Maria Cristina Zindel Deboni, University of Sao Paulo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02583737
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CAEE 30738714.0.0000.0075.
- Status last verified
- May 2016
- First submitted
- 19 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 11 May 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Acocella A, Bertolai R, Nissan J, Sacco R. Clinical, histological and histomorphometrical study of maxillary sinus augmentation using cortico-cancellous fresh frozen bone chips. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011 Apr;39(3):192-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.03.019. Epub 2010 May 7.
PubMed 20452232Chiapasco M, Giammattei M, Carmagnola D, Autelitano L, Rabbiosi D, Dellavia C. Iliac crest fresh-frozen allografts and autografts in maxillary and mandibular reconstruction: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation. Minerva Stomatol. 2013 Jan-Feb;62(1-2):3-16. English, Italian.
PubMed 23422679de Castilho TR, Tortamano P, Marotti J, de Andrade JC Jr, Chilvarquer I, Ximenez ME, Alves MT. Clinical and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Fresh Frozen Bone Allograft in Sinus Lift Surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Feb;18(1):40-50. doi: 10.1111/cid.12234. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
PubMed 24909241Deluiz D, Oliveira LS, Pires FR, Tinoco EM. Time-dependent changes in fresh-frozen bone block grafts: tomographic, histologic, and histomorphometric findings. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Apr;17(2):296-306. doi: 10.1111/cid.12108. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
PubMed 23837530Eskan MA, Greenwell H, Hill M, Morton D, Vidal R, Shumway B, Girouard ME. Platelet-rich plasma-assisted guided bone regeneration for ridge augmentation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2014 May;85(5):661-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.130260. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
PubMed 23895252Goulet JA, Senunas LE, DeSilva GL, Greenfield ML. Autogenous iliac crest bone graft. Complications and functional assessment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Jun;(339):76-81. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199706000-00011.
PubMed 9186204Holtzclaw D, Toscano N, Eisenlohr L, Callan D. The safety of bone allografts used in dentistry: a review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Sep;139(9):1192-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0334.
PubMed 18762629Le B, Rohrer MD, Prasad HS. Screw "tent-pole" grafting technique for reconstruction of large vertical alveolar ridge defects using human mineralized allograft for implant site preparation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Feb;68(2):428-35. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.059. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
PubMed 20116718Pimentel AC, Napimoga MH, Manzi MR, Sendyk WR. Reconstruction of the edentulous mandible with fresh frozen bone grafts and implants: a 4-year report of a prospective clinical study. Cell Tissue Bank. 2014 Mar;15(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s10561-012-9352-y. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
PubMed 23184222Pelegrine AA, Sorgi da Costa CE, Sendyk WR, Gromatzky A. The comparative analysis of homologous fresh frozen bone and autogenous bone graft, associated or not with autogenous bone marrow, in rabbit calvaria: a clinical and histomorphometric study. Cell Tissue Bank. 2011 Aug;12(3):171-84. doi: 10.1007/s10561-010-9178-4. Epub 2010 May 16.
PubMed 20473718Schwartz Z, Goldstein M, Raviv E, Hirsch A, Ranly DM, Boyan BD. Clinical evaluation of demineralized bone allograft in a hyaluronic acid carrier for sinus lift augmentation in humans: a computed tomography and histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Apr;18(2):204-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01303.x.
PubMed 17348885
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Histological and Microtomographic Comparative Study Between Lyophilized or Frozen Bone Allografts for Sinus-lifting: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02583737
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CAEE 30738714.0.0000.0075.
- Conditions
- Disorder of Maxillary Sinus, Accessory; Bone, Bone Atrophy
- Keywords
- bone, maxillary sinus
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao PauloUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2016 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Bone resorption and atrophy in maxillary posterior region is due to severe periodontal disease and is consequent tooth extractions. Sinus pneumatisation can occur after tooth extraction and alveolar bone loss. Consequently, bone-reducing volume at that region is a great challenge to implantodontists. Sinus lifting surgery have been practiced since 80's and many biomaterials have been used to solve filling issues to maintain the sinus floor lifted in a position that can allow dental implants installation. Bone grafts have shown to be the best choice of filling grafts. Despite autologous bone are the gold standard filling biomaterial it is associates with great mortality and morbidity. So, bone allografts from tissue bank had been shown to be an advantageous alternative. Lyophilized or freeze tissue bone are the most common allografts but literature is poor in randomized controlled parallel clinical trials regarding those filling grafts for sinus lifting. The aim of this study is to perform a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing two bone allografts: lyophilized and freeze bone allografts from human bone tissue bank. The investigators want to verify which one can develop greater osteogenesis, if is there any difference between them regarding the architectural trabeculae formation, if there are different patterns of reabsorption and finally if is there any differences between them regarding primary and lately dental implants stability. To answer those questions the investigators propose firstly, to carry out microtomographic and histological analysis from trephine bone samples after six months of sinus lifting and grafting in healthy participants undergoing osseointegrated dental implants. Secondly, the primary and lately implant stability is going to be achieved employing Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| group lyophilized bone allograft | Active comparator | Procedure: lyophilized bone allograftsinus lifting with tissue bank lyophilized bone filling |
| group freeze bone allograft | Active comparator | Procedure: freeze bone allograftsinus lifting with freeze bone bank filling |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- healthy
- totally or partially edentulous patients, bilaterally, in upper premolar or molar region; presenting maxillary sinus lifting necessity with bilateral alveolar bone height lower than 5mm and indication for at least one osseointegrated dental implant in premolar or molar region.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- recent sinusitis history
- hypersensibility for sinus allergens, tabagism, ethylism
- severe periodontal disease, diabetes, hypertension.
- Cases that occur schneiderian membrane perforation will be excluded from the final sample.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| freeze bone allograftsinus lifting filling procedure employing freeze bone allograft from tissue bone bank. | Procedure or surgery | group freeze bone allograft |
| lyophilized bone allograftsinus lifting filling procedure employing lyophilized bone allograft from tissue bone bank. | Procedure or surgery | group lyophilized bone allograft |
Primary outcome
volume of bone neoformation in mm3
Time frame: six months after grafting
computational software for analysis the micro CT scanning of trephine bone samples images
area of bone neoformation in μm2
Time frame: six months after grafting
IMAGEJ histomorphometric software for analysis of trephine bone samples micrographic images
2 secondary outcomes
dental implants stability value
Time frame: six months after grafting
dental implants stability value
Time frame: six months after dental implant
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2016.
- Background: PubMed 20452232Acocella A, Bertolai R, Nissan J, Sacco R. Clinical, histological and histomorphometrical study of maxillary sinus augmentation using cortico-cancellous fresh frozen bone chips. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011 Apr;39(3):192-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.03.019. Epub 2010 May 7.
- Background: PubMed 23422679Chiapasco M, Giammattei M, Carmagnola D, Autelitano L, Rabbiosi D, Dellavia C. Iliac crest fresh-frozen allografts and autografts in maxillary and mandibular reconstruction: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation. Minerva Stomatol. 2013 Jan-Feb;62(1-2):3-16. English, Italian.
- Background: PubMed 24909241de Castilho TR, Tortamano P, Marotti J, de Andrade JC Jr, Chilvarquer I, Ximenez ME, Alves MT. Clinical and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Fresh Frozen Bone Allograft in Sinus Lift Surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Feb;18(1):40-50. doi: 10.1111/cid.12234. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
- Background: PubMed 23837530Deluiz D, Oliveira LS, Pires FR, Tinoco EM. Time-dependent changes in fresh-frozen bone block grafts: tomographic, histologic, and histomorphometric findings. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Apr;17(2):296-306. doi: 10.1111/cid.12108. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
- Background: PubMed 23895252Eskan MA, Greenwell H, Hill M, Morton D, Vidal R, Shumway B, Girouard ME. Platelet-rich plasma-assisted guided bone regeneration for ridge augmentation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2014 May;85(5):661-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.130260. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
- Background: PubMed 9186204Goulet JA, Senunas LE, DeSilva GL, Greenfield ML. Autogenous iliac crest bone graft. Complications and functional assessment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Jun;(339):76-81. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199706000-00011.
- Background: PubMed 18762629Holtzclaw D, Toscano N, Eisenlohr L, Callan D. The safety of bone allografts used in dentistry: a review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Sep;139(9):1192-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0334.
- Background: PubMed 20116718Le B, Rohrer MD, Prasad HS. Screw "tent-pole" grafting technique for reconstruction of large vertical alveolar ridge defects using human mineralized allograft for implant site preparation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Feb;68(2):428-35. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.059. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
- Background: PubMed 23184222Pimentel AC, Napimoga MH, Manzi MR, Sendyk WR. Reconstruction of the edentulous mandible with fresh frozen bone grafts and implants: a 4-year report of a prospective clinical study. Cell Tissue Bank. 2014 Mar;15(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s10561-012-9352-y. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
- Background: PubMed 20473718Pelegrine AA, Sorgi da Costa CE, Sendyk WR, Gromatzky A. The comparative analysis of homologous fresh frozen bone and autogenous bone graft, associated or not with autogenous bone marrow, in rabbit calvaria: a clinical and histomorphometric study. Cell Tissue Bank. 2011 Aug;12(3):171-84. doi: 10.1007/s10561-010-9178-4. Epub 2010 May 16.
- Background: PubMed 17348885Schwartz Z, Goldstein M, Raviv E, Hirsch A, Ranly DM, Boyan BD. Clinical evaluation of demineralized bone allograft in a hyaluronic acid carrier for sinus lift augmentation in humans: a computed tomography and histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Apr;18(2):204-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01303.x.
Related trials for Disorder of Maxillary Sinus
Recruiting
Two Bovine Xenografts in Lateral Window Sinus Augmentation With or Without Bone Marrow Blood
Alveolar Bone Loss, Sinus Floor Augmentation
Recruiting
The Application of a Biphasic Calcium Sulfate Graft Material in Sinus Floor Elevation
Alveolar Bone Loss, Edentulism Nos
Not yet recruiting
Buccal Periosteal Inversion Flap vs Buccal Advancement Flap for Acute Oro-Antral Communication Closure
Acute Oroantral Communication
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Customized 3D Printed Oral Stents During Head and Neck Radiotherapy
Head and Neck Carcinoma, Malignant Parotid Gland Neoplasm
RecruitingPhase 1
Testing the Addition of Ipatasertib to Usual Chemotherapy and Radiation for Head and Neck Cancer
Clinical Stage II HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8, Clinical Stage III HPV-Mediated (p16-Positive) Oropharyngeal Carcinoma AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing freeze bone allograft and lyophilized bone allograft in people with Disorder of Maxillary Sinus and Accessory; Bone, run by University of Sao Paulo.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
volume of bone neoformation in mm3 (time frame: six months after grafting). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02583737, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2016.