DiabetesPINUPNCT02586519
Pressure-Sensing Insoles in the Neuropathic Ulcer Treatment Pathway
A study testing SurroSense Rx System in people with Diabetes and Diabetes Complications, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) is a common complication with a 25% lifetime risk in patients with diabetes. While most of these ulcers can be treated successfully on an outpatient basis, some will persist and become infected. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes, Diabetes Complications, Neuropathy
- What is being tested?
- SurroSense Rx System
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Jun 2016to May 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diabetes (according to AAFP diagnostic criteria )
- Presence of neuropathy with Loss of Protective Sensation (LOPS), as defined by any loss of sensation as per the assessments included in the Modified Neuropathy Disability Score (MNDS)
- Active plantar diabetic foot ulcer (Grade 1A, according to the University of Texas Wound Classification System , )
- A minimum size ulcer ≥0.5cm2 and ≤ 12 cm2 post debridement at time of randomization
- If the subject has more than one ulcer, they should be identified and at least 2 cm apart
- Age >18
Show all 11Show fewer
- At least one palpable foot pulse
- Ability to understand all of the study requirements
- Life expectancy greater than the duration of the study
- Subject or responsible caregiver is willing and able to maintain the required offloading (as applicable for the location of the ulcer) and applicable dressing changes
- Doppler Ultrasound positive for at least one pedal pulse in each foot
Who cannot join
- Weight > 400 lb (182 kg)
- Uncorrected visual impairment
- Active Infection
- Non-plantar ulcers on the ankle, posterior heel, or other location
- More than one active plantar ulcer
- Presence of severe ischemia (any of: absence of foot pulses, Ankle Brachial Index 0.6 > [ABI] > 1.2, capillary refill time > 5 seconds; see Appendix 3)
Show all 27Show fewer
- Current participation in another clinical investigation of a medical device or a drug; or has participated in such a study within 30 days prior to this study
- Current smokers
- Active abuse of alcohol
- o Subject has a history of any of the following intercurrent illnesses or conditions that would compromise the safety of the subject or the normal healing process:
- End-stage renal disease
- Immunosuppression
- Severe malnutrition
- Liver disease
- Aplastic anemia
- Scleroderma
- Acquired immune deficiency disease (AIDS) or HIV positive
- Connective tissue disorder
- Exacerbation of sickle cell anemia
- Active Charcot foot
- Excessive lymphedema
- Osteomyelitis and gangrene
- Subjects with ulcers secondary to a disease other than diabetes (e.g. vasculitis, neoplasms or haematological disorders)
- o At the end of the run-in period and prior to randomization, the subject be excluded if the following conditions are not met:
- Subject does not continue to meet the entrance criteria (inclusion and exclusion)
- The size of the study ulcer, following debridement, has decreased by more than 30% from the baseline assessment measured at screening.
- Abnormal toe and/or ankle range of motion
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Zivot Limb Preservation Centre- Peter Lougheed Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T1Y 6J4
About this study
Official title: Pressure-Sensing Insoles in the Neuropathic Ulcer Treatment Pathway (PINUP): A Randomized Controlled Trial for Active Neuropathic Ulcer Treatment
Diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) is a common complication with a 25% lifetime risk in patients with diabetes. While most of these ulcers can be treated successfully on an outpatient basis, some will persist and become infected. Nearly one fifth of patients with lower-extremity diabetic ulcers will require amputation of the affected limb, resulting in staggering costs for both the patient and the healthcare system. Therapies that promote rapid and complete healing and reduce the need for expensive surgical procedures impact these costs substantially.
The standard of care for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers is the removable cast walker (RCW). RCW use has demonstrated plantar pressure reduction yet is typically perceived as having compliance issues due to its removable nature. In addressing this limitation, a modified version of the RCW has been developed by wrapping it in a layer of cohesive or plaster bandage. This technique has been termed the "instant" total contact cast (iTCC) derived from the seldom-used, gold standard treatment, the total contact cast (TCC). While ease of application and potential clinical equivalence are clear benefits, the iTCC carries disadvantages on account of its irremovability. For example, frequent dressing changes impractical, yet may be necessary for complex wound care. The goal of this research is to continue inquiry and innovation in this most basic aspect of care, whilst addressing the limitations of past research and failures in this domain.
The investigators propose examining the capability of the SurroSense Rx® smart insole and smartwatch system (Orpyx Medical Technologies Inc., Calgary AB) in managing and monitoring adherence to plantar pressure offloading through alert-based feedback. The insoles are embedded with pressure sensors, which wirelessly communicate with a smartwatch that provides feedback on modifying activity or pressure profile over time. This smartwatch transmits audio, visual, and tactile notifications when excessive pressure-time thresholds under plantar regions of interest have been met. This feedback allows patients to be educated on their plantar pressure, and engages them and their caregivers to manage adherence to offloading. The investigators also propose comparing the healing rates of active neuropathic ulcers using RCWs coupled with the SurroSense Rx® smart insole system to assess whether adjunctive use of the two interventions improves the efficiency of neuropathic ulcer treatment.
Read the detailed description
Pressure offloading is the lynchpin of neuropathic ulcer care. Multiple methods of statically reducing pressure have been employed, with various degrees of success, in the ulcer care continuum. Traditional offloading interventions redistribute the load on the plantar surface, and include: non-removable devices (total contact casts, removable walkers rendered non-removable, and cast shoes), and removable devices (walkers, forefoot offloading shoes, half shoes, bivalve total contact casts, and therapeutic shoes)1,2,3.
A Cochrane Review on the use of offloading in the treatment of uncomplicated neuropathic plantar ulcers gives the efficacy of each device type in terms of percentage of ulcers healed and time required for healing4. The total contact cast has been found to be more effective than removable devices in many randomized controlled trials, for both the percentage of neuropathic ulcers healed and the time required for healing5,6,7. Ninety-two percent of neuropathic ulcers healed in an average of 6 weeks8. Removable walkers made non-removable may be as effective as total contact casts9,10,11. The effectiveness of forefoot offloading shoes, half-shoes, and cast shoes in the healing of neuropathic forefoot ulcers needs to be confirmed by prospective trials12. The lower efficacy of prescribed removable devices could be attributable to a lower adherence to recommended use13.
The effectiveness of offloading interventions is intimately linked to the skin reperfusion that is seen when persistent external pressure is alleviated. Key modifiable parameters in mitigating tissue damage to the neuropathic foot are pressure and time. Kosiak reported in 1959 that "microscopic pathologic changes were noted in tissues subjected to as little as 60 mmHg for only one hour"14,15. More recently, exposures from 15 min to one hour at pressures greater than 240 mmHg, and from two hours or more at pressures greater than 67 mmHg, were found to cause cell death in rat muscle tissue16. Despite this, there is limited information regarding the efficacy of interventions aimed at preventing pressure ulcers; a comprehensive review of the literature did not find enough evidence to recommend a repositioning frequency17. A consensus document from an international review on pressure ulcer prevention states that "patients confined to wheelchairs should be taught to reposition every 15 minutes"18.
While established pressure offloading interventions are able to statically reduce pressure on the active ulcer, they provide no dynamic relief of pressure. Since neuropathy is characterized by a loss of protective sensation (LOPS), the patient is often unaware of sustained pressure on a specific anatomic region over time. Even with static offloading instruments, it is conceivable that critical pressure and time thresholds can be dynamically exceeded without the patient's knowledge or ability to address the problem.
Taken together, the literature provides support for the development of a system that monitors pressure over time at key locations, and provides alert-based feedback to guide as-needed, patient-based offloading for use in patients with active ulceration.
The SurroSense Rx system (Orpyx Medical Technologies Inc., Calgary, AB) is a patent pending (US Publication #20120109013 and PCT WO/2012/055029) footwear system designed to aid in the prevention of plantar pressure ulceration and re-ulceration and the treatment of active ulcers in neuropathic patients. It comprises two pressure-sensing inserts and a smartwatch display device. The device alerts the user when "safe" pressure and time thresholds have been exceeded; the current thresholds are based on the general clinical understanding of pressure ulcer formation, which indicates that a conservative threshold would be >30-50mmHg for >15 minutes. For a review of the literature, please refer to Appendix 4. As more plantar pressure and outcome data are collected over time, these thresholds may be modified for future iterations of the product. These thresholds will be kept constant for the duration of the study in question. The device measures plantar pressures at discrete points corresponding to bony prominences that would be considered to be at higher risk for ulceration: the first metatarsal head (1), the lateral metatarsal heads (2), the great toe (1), the lateral toes (1), the lateral foot (2), and the heel (1). These areas were selected based on the inherent high risk of neuropathic ulceration at these anatomic locations. This data is tracked, with analysis being performed on those that have been collected over the last 15 minutes. If > 95% of the measurements taken by a pressure sensor over a 15-minute scanning window exceed 30-50 mmHg, an alert is sent to the user via the smartwatch to guide them to appropriately offload that area.
The proof of concept of the designed platform as a supplement in the management of the diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) will be assessed in the context of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) pilot. Our hypotheses are that the proposed technology will:
- Accelerate the wound healing process (i.e. success of complete wound healing within 16 weeks, time to heal, rate of wound size change, and complication rate);
- Improve adherence with RCW use (measured in hours of use per day); and
- Improve offloading (i.e. in terms of pressure-time intervals).
- Upon wound closure, prevent the incidence of plantar ulcer recurrence.
Eligible subjects will be randomized to the Experimental Arm, Control Arm A or Control Arm B (25 per arm). The experimental group will be provided with an active (alerting) SurroSense Rx® device fitted into a standardized RCW* (Rebound® Diabetic Walker, Össur, Iceland). Control Group A will be provided with an inactive (non-alerting) version of the SurroSense Rx® device fitted into a standardized RCW. Control Group B will be provided with an inactive version of the SurroSense Rx® device fitted into a standardized RCW and secured with a device-specific tie; this will act as an iTCC device for the purposes of this trial. Patients in all arms will be provided with a New Balance 928 shoe to wear on their contralateral foot so as to ensure optimal device performance. All patients will be assessed at baseline and every week until successful wound healing or 16 weeks, whichever comes first. Following wound resolution, patients will be followed with their assigned device, being used in a pair of New Balance 928 shoes to be provided to the patient, for 6 months for ulcer recurrence. After 6 months, the device will be discontinued, at which time the patients will be followed for an additional 12 months for further ulcer recurrence. Should a patient's wound remain unresolved after 16 weeks, they will continue using their assigned device into the subsequent 6-month period. If wound resolution occurs during this 6-month period, patients will switch to the New Balance 928 shoes for the remainder of the period; however, if wound resolution does not occur during this time, the patient will be withdrawn from the study prior to the commencement of the subsequent 12-month observation period. For all research subjects wearing the SurroSense Rx®, the device will measure plantar pressure and adherence to prescribed offloading. All groups will be fit with Jawbone UP Activity Trackers (or an equivalent activity tracker) so as to monitor their activity throughout the study.
*The removable Rebound® Diabetic Walker insole is heat-moldable: it can be heated (3 minutes at 110°C/230°F) and formed to the patients' foot (the patient stands in socks on the heated insole for 1 minute - then the hexagons should be removed as appropriate). This method should improve the weight distribution of the plantar foot and provide better offloading at the ulcer sites, and is recommended for optimal treatment.
Primary aims of the study:
- This pilot study will investigate the efficacy of the SurroSense Rx® system in expediting the healing of active neuropathic ulcers in terms of rate of wound area reduction.
- It will also investigate the system's potential to improve healing rates in the treatment of active neuropathic ulcers using the more practical RCWs.
- It will also investigate the system's potential to prevent recurrent ulceration post ulcer resolution. To achieve this, following wound resolution, patients will be followed for 18 months (the first 6 months with their assigned device) to monitor for ulcer recurrence.
Secondary aims of the study:
- Compare complete wound healing at 16 weeks in the experimental versus control groups
- Compare the healing times and rates as a function of the patient's baseline Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) and Modified Neuropathy Disability Score (MNDS)19 in the experimental versus control group
- Compare the change in the MNDS over the course of the study
- Performance of a cost-effectiveness analysis of the experimental versus control group's methods of treating diabetic ulcers
- Elucidate pressure data and adherence parameters (activity data-including step count and type of activity, peak pressures, number of alerts, measures of central tendency for time to offload, areas of alert generation, hours of use per day) for all patients, and compare those data for patients in the experimental versus control groups
- Compare area of ulceration to areas of SurroSense Rx® device alert generation (active devices) or would-be alert generation (inactive devices)
- Compare pressure data and adherence parameters (activity data-including step count and type of activity, peak pressures, number of alerts, measures of central tendency for time to offload, areas of alert generation, hours of use per day) to MNSI and MNDS Scales
- Examine the ability of pressure data and adherence parameters to predict healing
- Comparison of complication rates in the experimental versus control groups
- Being tested
- SurroSense Rx System
- Keywords
- wearable technology, Orpyx, SurroSense Rx, smart insole, TCC, total contact cast, insole, removable cast walker, RCW
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Complications, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Diabetic Foot
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SurroSense Rx SystemDevice
Also called SurroSense Rx Smart Insole System
The SurroSense Rx system (Orpyx Medical Technologies Inc., Calgary, AB) is a smart insole system designed to aid in the prevention of plantar pressure ulceration and re-ulceration, and the treatment of active ulcers in neuropathic patients. It comprises two pressure-sensing inserts and a smartwatch display device. The device alerts the user when "safe" pressure and time thresholds have been exceeded so that on-demand offloading can occur.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active SurroSense Rx System + RCW | Experimental | Patients randomized to the experimental group will be fitted with an active (alerting) version of the SurroSense R® smart insole System. This device will be placed in the RCW, underneath the liner. The device tab will be fed up the instep, through a hole in the liner, and affixed to the dorsum of the RCW by way of a tie. Receives: Device: SurroSense Rx System |
| Inactive SurroSense Rx System + RCW | Sham comparator | Patients randomized to this group will be fitted with an inactive (non-alerting) version of the device in an identical fashion. Receives: Device: SurroSense Rx System |
| Inactive SurroSense Rx System + iTCC | Sham comparator | Patients in this group will be fitted with an inactive (non-alerting) version of the device in an identical fashion. The RCW will be further secured using a device specific tie such that it acts as an iTCC. Receives: Device: SurroSense Rx System |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of Wound Closure
Rate of Wound Closure (mm2 per day)
Measured: 12 Weeks
Rate of Wound Resolution
Rate of Wound Closure (Complete) over first 12 weeks
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (4)
Recurrence of Ulcer
Rate of ulcer recurrence in 6 months post complete wound closure (epithelialization)
Measured: 6 months
Cost Utility
Cost of care over assessed period
Measured: Wound Healing Period (up to 12 weeks) + 6 Months Post-Wound Closure
Activity
Change in activity (step count) over time period of assessment
Measured: Wound Healing Period (up to 12 weeks) + 6 Months Post-Wound Closure
Complication Rates
Requirement for antibiotics and/or surgical intervention
Measured: Wound Healing Period (up to 12 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2016
- Primary completionMay 2019
- Study completionMay 2019
Why it stopped: During the unavoidable gap resulting from the global pandemic, the technologies being used in this study have significantly improved and it is no longer optimal to provide patients with the old technology when improved technology is available.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of CalgaryThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Calgary
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Karim Manji, University of Calgary
- Investigators
- Karim Manji, DPM, AACFAS, Principal investigator, University of Calgary
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02586519
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PINUP
- Acronym
- PINUP
- Status last verified
- Nov 2021
- First submitted
- 22 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 6 Dec 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Cavanagh PR, Bus SA. Off-loading the diabetic foot for ulcer prevention and healing. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep;52(3 Suppl):37S-43S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.007.
PubMed 20804932Bus SA, Valk GD, van Deursen RW, Armstrong DG, Caravaggi C, Hlavacek P, Bakker K, Cavanagh PR. The effectiveness of footwear and offloading interventions to prevent and heal foot ulcers and reduce plantar pressure in diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008 May-Jun;24 Suppl 1:S162-80. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.850.
PubMed 18442178Bus SA. Priorities in offloading the diabetic foot. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012 Feb;28 Suppl 1:54-9. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2240.
PubMed 22271724Lewis J, Lipp A. Pressure-relieving interventions for treating diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD002302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002302.pub2.
PubMed 23440787KOSIAK M. Etiology and pathology of ischemic ulcers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1959 Feb;40(2):62-9. No abstract available.
PubMed 13618101Linder-Ganz E, Engelberg S, Scheinowitz M, Gefen A. Pressure-time cell death threshold for albino rat skeletal muscles as related to pressure sore biomechanics. J Biomech. 2006;39(14):2725-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.08.010. Epub 2005 Sep 30.
PubMed 16199045Reddy M, Gill SS, Rochon PA. Preventing pressure ulcers: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006 Aug 23;296(8):974-84. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.8.974.
PubMed 16926357Chawla A, Bhasin G, Chawla R, "Validation Of Neuropathy Symptoms Score (NSS) And Neuropathy Disability Score (NDS ) In The Clinical Diagnosis Of Peripheral Neuropathy In Middle Aged People With Diabetes." The Internet Journal of Family Practice; 12(1).
Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Harkless LB. Validation of a diabetic wound classification system. The contribution of depth, infection, and ischemia to risk of amputation. Diabetes Care. 1998 May;21(5):855-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.5.855.
PubMed 9589255Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Harkless LB. Classification of diabetic foot wounds. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996 Nov-Dec;35(6):528-31. doi: 10.1016/s1067-2516(96)80125-6.
PubMed 8986890Mueller MJ, Diamond JE, Sinacore DR, Delitto A, Blair VP 3rd, Drury DA, Rose SJ. Total contact casting in treatment of diabetic plantar ulcers. Controlled clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 1989 Jun;12(6):384-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.12.6.384.
PubMed 2659299Ganguly S, Chakraborty K, Mandal PK, Ballav A, Choudhury S, Bagchi S, Mukherjee S. A comparative study between total contact casting and conventional dressings in the non-surgical management of diabetic plantar foot ulcers. J Indian Med Assoc. 2008 Apr;106(4):237-9, 244.
PubMed 18828342Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Wu S, Boulton AJ. Evaluation of removable and irremovable cast walkers in the healing of diabetic foot wounds: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2005 Mar;28(3):551-4. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.3.551.
PubMed 15735186Ahn C, Salcido RS. Advances in wound photography and assessment methods. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2008 Feb;21(2):85-93; quiz 94-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000305411.58350.7d.
PubMed 18349736Thomas GB, Finney RL. Calculus and Analytic Geometry. 9th ed. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley; 1995.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Dec 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pressure-Sensing Insoles in the Neuropathic Ulcer Treatment Pathway (PINUP): A Randomized Controlled Trial for Active Neuropathic Ulcer Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02586519
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PINUP / PINUP
- Keywords
- wearable technology, Orpyx, SurroSense Rx, smart insole, TCC, total contact cast, insole, removable cast walker
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: During the unavoidable gap resulting from the global pandemic, the technologies being used in this study have significantly improved and it is no longer optimal to provide patients with the old technology when improved technology is available.
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CalgaryUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2016
- Primary completion
- May 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) is a common complication with a 25% lifetime risk in patients with diabetes. While most of these ulcers can be treated successfully on an outpatient basis, some will persist and become infected. Nearly one fifth of patients with lower-extremity diabetic ulcers will require amputation of the affected limb, resulting in staggering costs for both the patient and the healthcare system. Therapies that promote rapid and complete healing and reduce the need for expensive surgical procedures impact these costs substantially.
The standard of care for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers is the removable cast walker (RCW). RCW use has demonstrated plantar pressure reduction yet is typically perceived as having compliance issues due to its removable nature. In addressing this limitation, a modified version of the RCW has been developed by wrapping it in a layer of cohesive or plaster bandage. This technique has been termed the "instant" total contact cast (iTCC) derived from the seldom-used, gold standard treatment, the total contact cast (TCC). While ease of application and potential clinical equivalence are clear benefits, the iTCC carries disadvantages on account of its irremovability. For example, frequent dressing changes impractical, yet may be necessary for complex wound care. The goal of this research is to continue inquiry and innovation in this most basic aspect of care, whilst addressing the limitations of past research and failures in this domain.
The investigators propose examining the capability of the SurroSense Rx® smart insole and smartwatch system (Orpyx Medical Technologies Inc., Calgary AB) in managing and monitoring adherence to plantar pressure offloading through alert-based feedback. The insoles are embedded with pressure sensors, which wirelessly communicate with a smartwatch that provides feedback on modifying activity or pressure profile over time. This smartwatch transmits audio, visual, and tactile notifications when excessive pressure-time thresholds under plantar regions of interest have been met. This feedback allows patients to be educated on their plantar pressure, and engages them and their caregivers to manage adherence to offloading. The investigators also propose comparing the healing rates of active neuropathic ulcers using RCWs coupled with the SurroSense Rx® smart insole system to assess whether adjunctive use of the two interventions improves the efficiency of neuropathic ulcer treatment.
Detailed description
Pressure offloading is the lynchpin of neuropathic ulcer care. Multiple methods of statically reducing pressure have been employed, with various degrees of success, in the ulcer care continuum. Traditional offloading interventions redistribute the load on the plantar surface, and include: non-removable devices (total contact casts, removable walkers rendered non-removable, and cast shoes), and removable devices (walkers, forefoot offloading shoes, half shoes, bivalve total contact casts, and therapeutic shoes)1,2,3.
A Cochrane Review on the use of offloading in the treatment of uncomplicated neuropathic plantar ulcers gives the efficacy of each device type in terms of percentage of ulcers healed and time required for healing4. The total contact cast has been found to be more effective than removable devices in many randomized controlled trials, for both the percentage of neuropathic ulcers healed and the time required for healing5,6,7. Ninety-two percent of neuropathic ulcers healed in an average of 6 weeks8. Removable walkers made non-removable may be as effective as total contact casts9,10,11. The effectiveness of forefoot offloading shoes, half-shoes, and cast shoes in the healing of neuropathic forefoot ulcers needs to be confirmed by prospective trials12. The lower efficacy of prescribed removable devices could be attributable to a lower adherence to recommended use13.
The effectiveness of offloading interventions is intimately linked to the skin reperfusion that is seen when persistent external pressure is alleviated. Key modifiable parameters in mitigating tissue damage to the neuropathic foot are pressure and time. Kosiak reported in 1959 that "microscopic pathologic changes were noted in tissues subjected to as little as 60 mmHg for only one hour"14,15. More recently, exposures from 15 min to one hour at pressures greater than 240 mmHg, and from two hours or more at pressures greater than 67 mmHg, were found to cause cell death in rat muscle tissue16. Despite this, there is limited information regarding the efficacy of interventions aimed at preventing pressure ulcers; a comprehensive review of the literature did not find enough evidence to recommend a repositioning frequency17. A consensus document from an international review on pressure ulcer prevention states that "patients confined to wheelchairs should be taught to reposition every 15 minutes"18.
While established pressure offloading interventions are able to statically reduce pressure on the active ulcer, they provide no dynamic relief of pressure. Since neuropathy is characterized by a loss of protective sensation (LOPS), the patient is often unaware of sustained pressure on a specific anatomic region over time. Even with static offloading instruments, it is conceivable that critical pressure and time thresholds can be dynamically exceeded without the patient's knowledge or ability to address the problem.
Taken together, the literature provides support for the development of a system that monitors pressure over time at key locations, and provides alert-based feedback to guide as-needed, patient-based offloading for use in patients with active ulceration.
The SurroSense Rx system (Orpyx Medical Technologies Inc., Calgary, AB) is a patent pending (US Publication #20120109013 and PCT WO/2012/055029) footwear system designed to aid in the prevention of plantar pressure ulceration and re-ulceration and the treatment of active ulcers in neuropathic patients. It comprises two pressure-sensing inserts and a smartwatch display device. The device alerts the user when "safe" pressure and time thresholds have been exceeded; the current thresholds are based on the general clinical understanding of pressure ulcer formation, which indicates that a conservative threshold would be >30-50mmHg for >15 minutes. For a review of the literature, please refer to Appendix 4. As more plantar pressure and outcome data are collected over time, these thresholds may be modified for future iterations of the product. These thresholds will be kept constant for the duration of the study in question. The device measures plantar pressures at discrete points corresponding to bony prominences that would be considered to be at higher risk for ulceration: the first metatarsal head (1), the lateral metatarsal heads (2), the great toe (1), the lateral toes (1), the lateral foot (2), and the heel (1). These areas were selected based on the inherent high risk of neuropathic ulceration at these anatomic locations. This data is tracked, with analysis being performed on those that have been collected over the last 15 minutes. If > 95% of the measurements taken by a pressure sensor over a 15-minute scanning window exceed 30-50 mmHg, an alert is sent to the user via the smartwatch to guide them to appropriately offload that area.
The proof of concept of the designed platform as a supplement in the management of the diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) will be assessed in the context of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) pilot. Our hypotheses are that the proposed technology will:
- Accelerate the wound healing process (i.e. success of complete wound healing within 16 weeks, time to heal, rate of wound size change, and complication rate);
- Improve adherence with RCW use (measured in hours of use per day); and
- Improve offloading (i.e. in terms of pressure-time intervals).
- Upon wound closure, prevent the incidence of plantar ulcer recurrence.
Eligible subjects will be randomized to the Experimental Arm, Control Arm A or Control Arm B (25 per arm). The experimental group will be provided with an active (alerting) SurroSense Rx® device fitted into a standardized RCW* (Rebound® Diabetic Walker, Össur, Iceland). Control Group A will be provided with an inactive (non-alerting) version of the SurroSense Rx® device fitted into a standardized RCW. Control Group B will be provided with an inactive version of the SurroSense Rx® device fitted into a standardized RCW and secured with a device-specific tie; this will act as an iTCC device for the purposes of this trial. Patients in all arms will be provided with a New Balance 928 shoe to wear on their contralateral foot so as to ensure optimal device performance. All patients will be assessed at baseline and every week until successful wound healing or 16 weeks, whichever comes first. Following wound resolution, patients will be followed with their assigned device, being used in a pair of New Balance 928 shoes to be provided to the patient, for 6 months for ulcer recurrence. After 6 months, the device will be discontinued, at which time the patients will be followed for an additional 12 months for further ulcer recurrence. Should a patient's wound remain unresolved after 16 weeks, they will continue using their assigned device into the subsequent 6-month period. If wound resolution occurs during this 6-month period, patients will switch to the New Balance 928 shoes for the remainder of the period; however, if wound resolution does not occur during this time, the patient will be withdrawn from the study prior to the commencement of the subsequent 12-month observation period. For all research subjects wearing the SurroSense Rx®, the device will measure plantar pressure and adherence to prescribed offloading. All groups will be fit with Jawbone UP Activity Trackers (or an equivalent activity tracker) so as to monitor their activity throughout the study.
*The removable Rebound® Diabetic Walker insole is heat-moldable: it can be heated (3 minutes at 110°C/230°F) and formed to the patients' foot (the patient stands in socks on the heated insole for 1 minute - then the hexagons should be removed as appropriate). This method should improve the weight distribution of the plantar foot and provide better offloading at the ulcer sites, and is recommended for optimal treatment.
Primary aims of the study:
- This pilot study will investigate the efficacy of the SurroSense Rx® system in expediting the healing of active neuropathic ulcers in terms of rate of wound area reduction.
- It will also investigate the system's potential to improve healing rates in the treatment of active neuropathic ulcers using the more practical RCWs.
- It will also investigate the system's potential to prevent recurrent ulceration post ulcer resolution. To achieve this, following wound resolution, patients will be followed for 18 months (the first 6 months with their assigned device) to monitor for ulcer recurrence.
Secondary aims of the study:
- Compare complete wound healing at 16 weeks in the experimental versus control groups
- Compare the healing times and rates as a function of the patient's baseline Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) and Modified Neuropathy Disability Score (MNDS)19 in the experimental versus control group
- Compare the change in the MNDS over the course of the study
- Performance of a cost-effectiveness analysis of the experimental versus control group's methods of treating diabetic ulcers
- Elucidate pressure data and adherence parameters (activity data-including step count and type of activity, peak pressures, number of alerts, measures of central tendency for time to offload, areas of alert generation, hours of use per day) for all patients, and compare those data for patients in the experimental versus control groups
- Compare area of ulceration to areas of SurroSense Rx® device alert generation (active devices) or would-be alert generation (inactive devices)
- Compare pressure data and adherence parameters (activity data-including step count and type of activity, peak pressures, number of alerts, measures of central tendency for time to offload, areas of alert generation, hours of use per day) to MNSI and MNDS Scales
- Examine the ability of pressure data and adherence parameters to predict healing
- Comparison of complication rates in the experimental versus control groups
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active SurroSense Rx System + RCW | Experimental | Device: SurroSense Rx SystemPatients randomized to the experimental group will be fitted with an active (alerting) version of the SurroSense R® smart insole System. This device will be placed in the RCW, underneath the liner. The device tab will be fed up the instep, through a hole in the liner, and affixed to the dorsum of the RCW by way of a tie. |
| Inactive SurroSense Rx System + RCW | Sham comparator | Device: SurroSense Rx SystemPatients randomized to this group will be fitted with an inactive (non-alerting) version of the device in an identical fashion. |
| Inactive SurroSense Rx System + iTCC | Sham comparator | Device: SurroSense Rx SystemPatients in this group will be fitted with an inactive (non-alerting) version of the device in an identical fashion. The RCW will be further secured using a device specific tie such that it acts as an iTCC. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Diabetes (according to AAFP diagnostic criteria )
- Presence of neuropathy with Loss of Protective Sensation (LOPS), as defined by any loss of sensation as per the assessments included in the Modified Neuropathy Disability Score (MNDS)
- Active plantar diabetic foot ulcer (Grade 1A, according to the University of Texas Wound Classification System , )
- Age >18
- At least one palpable foot pulse
Key exclusion criteria (27 listed)
- Weight > 400 lb (182 kg)
- Uncorrected visual impairment
- Active Infection
- Non-plantar ulcers on the ankle, posterior heel, or other location
- More than one active plantar ulcer
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SurroSense Rx SystemAlso: SurroSense Rx Smart Insole SystemThe SurroSense Rx system (Orpyx Medical Technologies Inc., Calgary, AB) is a smart insole system designed to aid in the prevention of plantar pressure ulceration and re-ulceration, and the treatment of active ulcers in neuropathic patients. It comprises two pressure-sensing inserts and a smartwatch display device. The device alerts the user when "safe" pressure and time thresholds have been exceeded so that on-demand offloading can occur. | Device | Active SurroSense Rx System + RCW, Inactive SurroSense Rx System + RCW, Inactive SurroSense Rx System + iTCC |
Primary outcome
Rate of Wound Closure
Time frame: 12 Weeks
Rate of Wound Closure (mm2 per day)
Rate of Wound Resolution
Time frame: 12 weeks
Rate of Wound Closure (Complete) over first 12 weeks
4 secondary outcomes
Recurrence of Ulcer
Time frame: 6 months
Cost Utility
Time frame: Wound Healing Period (up to 12 weeks) + 6 Months Post-Wound Closure
Activity
Time frame: Wound Healing Period (up to 12 weeks) + 6 Months Post-Wound Closure
Complication Rates
Time frame: Wound Healing Period (up to 12 weeks)
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: During the unavoidable gap resulting from the global pandemic, the technologies being used in this study have significantly improved and it is no longer optimal to provide patients with the old technology when improved technology is available.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Dec 2021.
- Background: PubMed 20804932Cavanagh PR, Bus SA. Off-loading the diabetic foot for ulcer prevention and healing. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep;52(3 Suppl):37S-43S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.007.
- Background: PubMed 18442178Bus SA, Valk GD, van Deursen RW, Armstrong DG, Caravaggi C, Hlavacek P, Bakker K, Cavanagh PR. The effectiveness of footwear and offloading interventions to prevent and heal foot ulcers and reduce plantar pressure in diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008 May-Jun;24 Suppl 1:S162-80. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.850.
- Background: PubMed 22271724Bus SA. Priorities in offloading the diabetic foot. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012 Feb;28 Suppl 1:54-9. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2240.
- Background: PubMed 23440787Lewis J, Lipp A. Pressure-relieving interventions for treating diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD002302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002302.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 13618101KOSIAK M. Etiology and pathology of ischemic ulcers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1959 Feb;40(2):62-9. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 16199045Linder-Ganz E, Engelberg S, Scheinowitz M, Gefen A. Pressure-time cell death threshold for albino rat skeletal muscles as related to pressure sore biomechanics. J Biomech. 2006;39(14):2725-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.08.010. Epub 2005 Sep 30.
- Background: PubMed 16926357Reddy M, Gill SS, Rochon PA. Preventing pressure ulcers: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006 Aug 23;296(8):974-84. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.8.974.
- BackgroundChawla A, Bhasin G, Chawla R, "Validation Of Neuropathy Symptoms Score (NSS) And Neuropathy Disability Score (NDS ) In The Clinical Diagnosis Of Peripheral Neuropathy In Middle Aged People With Diabetes." The Internet Journal of Family Practice; 12(1).
- Background: PubMed 9589255Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Harkless LB. Validation of a diabetic wound classification system. The contribution of depth, infection, and ischemia to risk of amputation. Diabetes Care. 1998 May;21(5):855-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.5.855.
- Background: PubMed 8986890Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Harkless LB. Classification of diabetic foot wounds. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996 Nov-Dec;35(6):528-31. doi: 10.1016/s1067-2516(96)80125-6.
- Background: PubMed 2659299Mueller MJ, Diamond JE, Sinacore DR, Delitto A, Blair VP 3rd, Drury DA, Rose SJ. Total contact casting in treatment of diabetic plantar ulcers. Controlled clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 1989 Jun;12(6):384-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.12.6.384.
- Background: PubMed 18828342Ganguly S, Chakraborty K, Mandal PK, Ballav A, Choudhury S, Bagchi S, Mukherjee S. A comparative study between total contact casting and conventional dressings in the non-surgical management of diabetic plantar foot ulcers. J Indian Med Assoc. 2008 Apr;106(4):237-9, 244.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Karim Manji, DPM, AACFAS principal investigator
University of Calgary
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SurroSense Rx System in people with Diabetes and Diabetes Complications, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 27 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: During the unavoidable gap resulting from the global pandemic, the technologies being used in this study have significantly improved and it is no longer optimal to provide patients with the old technology when improved technology is available.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of Wound Closure (time frame: 12 Weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02586519, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Dec 2021.