AzTrials
AzTrials

Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)Phase 4PLATINUMNCT02587065

Plegridy Satisfaction Study in Participants

A Phase 4 study testing peginterferon beta-1a in people with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS), run by Biogen at 30 sites in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to investigate whether Peg-IFN beta-1a improves the satisfaction of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) participants unsatisfied with injectable subcutaneous Interferons, as measured by the Abbreviated Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire to Medication (TSQM-9), at 12… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
What is being tested?
peginterferon beta-1a
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
193 participants
Where
30 sitesItaly
Study dates
3 Feb 2016to 21 Dec 2017
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects diagnosed with Relapsing Remitting MS according to 2010 McDonald criteria.
  • Subjects with EDSS score between 0.0 and 5.0 at baseline.

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
  • Have any contra-indications to treatment with Peg-IFN-beta 1a according to the Summary of Product Characteristics.
  • NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Trial locations and contacts

30 sites in 1 country.

30 sites in 1 country

Italy30 sites
  • Research Site

    Arezzo, 52100

  • Research Site

    Bari, 70124

  • Research Site

    Cagliari, 09126

  • Research Site

    Cefalù, 90015

  • Research Site

    Chieti, 66100

  • Research Site

    Como, 22100

  • Research Site

    Fidenza, 43036

  • Research Site

    Foligno, 06034

  • Research Site

    Gallarate, 21013

  • Research Site

    Genova, 16132

  • Research Site

    L’Aquila, 67100

  • Research Site

    Messina, 98125

  • Research Site

    Milan, 20132

  • Research Site

    Milan, 20133

  • Research Site

    Modena, 41126

  • Research Site

    Mondovì, 12084

  • research Site

    Naples, 80131

  • Research Site

    Naples, 80137

  • Research Site

    Orbassano, 10043

  • Research Site

    Ozieri, 07014

  • Research Site

    Palermo, 90129

  • Research Site

    Palermo, 90146

  • Research Site

    Pavia, 27100

  • Research Site

    Pietra Ligure, 17027

  • Research Site

    Pozzilli, 86077

  • Research Site

    Reggio Calabria, 89100

  • Research Site

    Roma, 00152

  • Research Site

    Roma, 00168

  • Research Site

    Roma, 00189

  • Research Site

    Torino, 10126

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Multicenter Interventional Phase IV Study for the Assessment of the Effects on Patient's Satisfaction of Plegridy (Pre-filled Pen) in Subjects With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis Unsatisfied With Other Injectable Subcutaneous Interferons (PLATINUM)

The primary objective of this study is to investigate whether Peg-IFN beta-1a improves the satisfaction of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) participants unsatisfied with injectable subcutaneous Interferons, as measured by the Abbreviated Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire to Medication (TSQM-9), at 12 weeks. The secondary objectives of this study are to evaluate in this study population: effects of Peg-IFN beta-1a treatment on participants' satisfaction at 24 weeks; effects of Peg-IFN beta-1a treatment on short-term participants' adherence; effects of Peg-IFN beta-1a treatment on participants' fatigue; effects of Peg-IFN beta-1a on disease activity and physical disability; impact of Peg-IFN beta-1a treatment on participant-reported health-related quality of life; impact of Peg-IFN beta-1a treatment on participants' injection-system satisfaction; Evaluate the relationship between participants' satisfaction and adherence; Evaluate the relationship between participants' satisfaction and social-demographic factors (age, sex, employment working, level of education, etc) and clinical characteristics (annualized relapse rate [ARR], disability, etc.) and to evaluate the treatment safety and tolerability.

Being tested
peginterferon beta-1a
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • peginterferon beta-1aDrug

    Also called BIIB017, PEGylated Interferon Beta-1a, Plegridy, PEG IFN β-1a

    125 mcg administered subcutaneously (SC) every 2 weeks.

Study groups in NCT02587065
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
peginterferon beta-1aExperimental125 μg administered subcutaneously (SC) every 2 weeks
Receives: Drug: peginterferon beta-1a

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Convenience Satisfaction Score of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire to Medication (TSQM-9) at Week 12

    TSQM is a 14-item instrument consisting of four scales: effectiveness scale (questions 1 to 3), side effects scale (questions 4 to 8), convenience scale (questions 9 to 11) and global satisfaction scale (questions 12 to 14). In TSQM-9, the five items related to side effects of medication were not included. The scores were computed by adding items for each domain. The lowest possible score was subtracted from this composite score and divided by the greatest possible score minus the lowest possible score. This provided a transformed score between 0 and 1 that was then multiplied by 100. TSQM-9 domain scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing higher satisfaction on that domain. Questionnaires were completed electronically by participants, by means of a participant i-PAD at each study visit.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Change From Baseline in the Score of All Domains of TSQM-9 at Week 24

    TSQM is a 14-item instrument consisting of four scales: effectiveness scale (questions 1 to 3), side effects scale (questions 4 to 8), convenience scale (questions 9 to 11) and global satisfaction scale (questions 12 to 14). In TSQM-9, the five items related to side effects of medication were not included. The scores were computed by adding items for each domain. The lowest possible score was subtracted from this composite score and divided by the greatest possible score minus the lowest possible score. This provided a transformed score between 0 and 1 that was then multiplied by 100. TSQM-9 domain scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing higher satisfaction on that domain. Questionnaires were completed electronically by participants, by means of a participant i-PAD at each study visit.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  2. Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Adherence to Study Treatment at Weeks 12 and 24

    Adherence to treatment was evaluated using a questionnaire assessing adherence and the reasons for not taking drug at the recommended frequency of administration. Participants who had taken the prescribed doses of treatment in the previous 28 days were evaluated.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

  3. Change From Baseline in Fatigue Status Scale (FSS) Score at Weeks 12 and 24

    FSS is a questionnaire composed of nine statements on the state of fatigue experienced during the previous week. The answers are within a scale of agreement ranging from 1 to 7, where 1 represents less fatigue and 7 indicates highest fatigue. The total score was obtained summing the number given at each item and it ranges from 7 to 63. An overall score of ≥36 indicates a state of fatigue. Questionnaires were completed electronically by participants, by means of a participant i-PAD at each study visit. Here, negative values indicate improvement in FSS score from baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

  4. Change From Baseline in Adapted Sclerosis Treatment Concerns Questionnaire (MSTCQ) Score at Weeks 12 and 24

    MSTCQ is a 20-item questionnaire adapted for 'Peg-interferon Beta 1a' containing two domains: injection system satisfaction (1-9) and side effects (1-11). All questions in the MSTCQ have a five-point response choice, with a minimum possible total score of 20 and a maximum possible total score of 100. Lower total scores indicating better outcomes. Questionnaires were completed electronically by participants, by means of a participant I-PAD at each study visit. Here, negative values indicate improvement in MSTCQ score from baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

  5. Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life Questionnaire (MusiQoL) Score at Week 12 and 24

    MusiQoL is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 31 items describing nine dimensions of health-related quality of life (QoL): activities of daily living, psychological wellbeing, symptoms, relationship with friends, relationship with family, sentimental and sexual life, coping rejection, relationship with healthcare system). All items are scored based on frequency/extent of an event on a five-point scale ranging from never/not at all (option 1) to always/very much (option 5). Total score is obtained by linearly transforming and standardizing on a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate a better level of health-related QoL for each dimension and for the global index score. Here, negative values indicate improvement in MusiQoL score from baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

  6. Change From Baseline in Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at Week 24

    Relapses are defined as neurologic symptoms lasting more than 24 hours which occur at least 30 days after the onset of a preceding event. ARR was calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants divided by the total participant-years of exposure to that treatment. Here negative sign indicates decrease in annual relapse rate as compared to baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  7. Percent Change in Relapse-Free Participants at Week 24

    Relapses are defined as neurologic symptoms lasting more than 24 hours which occur at least 30 days after the onset of a preceding event. Percent change in relapse-free participants had been calculated with respect to the number of relapse-free participants at baseline. Here, negative sign indicates decrease in number of relapse free participants at specified timepoint as compared to baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  8. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can herefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 24

  9. Number of Participants With AE Stratified by Severity

    Severity of AEs was evaluated based on the following criteria- Mild: Symptoms barely noticeable to participant or does not make participant uncomfortable; does not influence performance or functioning; prescription drug not ordinarily needed for relief of symptom(s) but may be given because of personality of participant. Moderate: Symptoms of a sufficient severity to make participant uncomfortable; performance of daily activity is influenced; participant is able to continue in study; treatment for symptom(s) may be needed. Severe: Symptoms cause severe discomfort; symptoms cause incapacitation or significant impact on participant's daily life; severity may cause cessation of treatment with study treatment; treatment for symptom(s) may be given and/or participant hospitalized.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 24

  10. Number of Participants With Clinical Abnormal Laboratory Values

    Participants with clinical abnormal laboratory values were reported throughout the studies.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Oct 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start3 Feb 2016
  3. Primary completion2 Oct 2017
  4. Study completion21 Dec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
193 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02587065
Sponsor's protocol ID
ITA-PEG-14-10779
Other IDs
2015-002201-11, 2015
Acronym
PLATINUM
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
23 Oct 2015
Last updated
31 Aug 2023
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing peginterferon beta-1a in people with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS), run by Biogen at 30 sites in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 30 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Jan 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Convenience Satisfaction Score of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire to Medication (TSQM-9) at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline, Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Aug 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in