Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)Phase 4PLATINUMNCT02587065
Plegridy Satisfaction Study in Participants
A Phase 4 study testing peginterferon beta-1a in people with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS), run by Biogen at 30 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to investigate whether Peg-IFN beta-1a improves the satisfaction of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) participants unsatisfied with injectable subcutaneous Interferons, as measured by the Abbreviated Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire to Medication (TSQM-9), at 12… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)
- What is being tested?
- peginterferon beta-1a
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 193 participants
- Where
- 30 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- 3 Feb 2016to 21 Dec 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects diagnosed with Relapsing Remitting MS according to 2010 McDonald criteria.
- Subjects with EDSS score between 0.0 and 5.0 at baseline.
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
- Have any contra-indications to treatment with Peg-IFN-beta 1a according to the Summary of Product Characteristics.
- NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Trial locations and contacts
30 sites in 1 country.
30 sites in 1 country
Italy30 sites
Research Site
Arezzo, 52100
Research Site
Bari, 70124
Research Site
Cagliari, 09126
Research Site
Cefalù, 90015
Research Site
Chieti, 66100
Research Site
Como, 22100
Research Site
Fidenza, 43036
Research Site
Foligno, 06034
Research Site
Gallarate, 21013
Research Site
Genova, 16132
Research Site
L’Aquila, 67100
Research Site
Messina, 98125
Research Site
Milan, 20132
Research Site
Milan, 20133
Research Site
Modena, 41126
Research Site
Mondovì, 12084
research Site
Naples, 80131
Research Site
Naples, 80137
Research Site
Orbassano, 10043
Research Site
Ozieri, 07014
Research Site
Palermo, 90129
Research Site
Palermo, 90146
Research Site
Pavia, 27100
Research Site
Pietra Ligure, 17027
Research Site
Pozzilli, 86077
Research Site
Reggio Calabria, 89100
Research Site
Roma, 00152
Research Site
Roma, 00168
Research Site
Roma, 00189
Research Site
Torino, 10126
About this study
Official title: Multicenter Interventional Phase IV Study for the Assessment of the Effects on Patient's Satisfaction of Plegridy (Pre-filled Pen) in Subjects With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis Unsatisfied With Other Injectable Subcutaneous Interferons (PLATINUM)
The primary objective of this study is to investigate whether Peg-IFN beta-1a improves the satisfaction of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) participants unsatisfied with injectable subcutaneous Interferons, as measured by the Abbreviated Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire to Medication (TSQM-9), at 12 weeks. The secondary objectives of this study are to evaluate in this study population: effects of Peg-IFN beta-1a treatment on participants' satisfaction at 24 weeks; effects of Peg-IFN beta-1a treatment on short-term participants' adherence; effects of Peg-IFN beta-1a treatment on participants' fatigue; effects of Peg-IFN beta-1a on disease activity and physical disability; impact of Peg-IFN beta-1a treatment on participant-reported health-related quality of life; impact of Peg-IFN beta-1a treatment on participants' injection-system satisfaction; Evaluate the relationship between participants' satisfaction and adherence; Evaluate the relationship between participants' satisfaction and social-demographic factors (age, sex, employment working, level of education, etc) and clinical characteristics (annualized relapse rate [ARR], disability, etc.) and to evaluate the treatment safety and tolerability.
- Being tested
- peginterferon beta-1a
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
peginterferon beta-1aDrug
Also called BIIB017, PEGylated Interferon Beta-1a, Plegridy, PEG IFN β-1a
125 mcg administered subcutaneously (SC) every 2 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| peginterferon beta-1a | Experimental | 125 μg administered subcutaneously (SC) every 2 weeks Receives: Drug: peginterferon beta-1a |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Convenience Satisfaction Score of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire to Medication (TSQM-9) at Week 12
TSQM is a 14-item instrument consisting of four scales: effectiveness scale (questions 1 to 3), side effects scale (questions 4 to 8), convenience scale (questions 9 to 11) and global satisfaction scale (questions 12 to 14). In TSQM-9, the five items related to side effects of medication were not included. The scores were computed by adding items for each domain. The lowest possible score was subtracted from this composite score and divided by the greatest possible score minus the lowest possible score. This provided a transformed score between 0 and 1 that was then multiplied by 100. TSQM-9 domain scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing higher satisfaction on that domain. Questionnaires were completed electronically by participants, by means of a participant i-PAD at each study visit.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Secondary outcomes (10)
Change From Baseline in the Score of All Domains of TSQM-9 at Week 24
TSQM is a 14-item instrument consisting of four scales: effectiveness scale (questions 1 to 3), side effects scale (questions 4 to 8), convenience scale (questions 9 to 11) and global satisfaction scale (questions 12 to 14). In TSQM-9, the five items related to side effects of medication were not included. The scores were computed by adding items for each domain. The lowest possible score was subtracted from this composite score and divided by the greatest possible score minus the lowest possible score. This provided a transformed score between 0 and 1 that was then multiplied by 100. TSQM-9 domain scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing higher satisfaction on that domain. Questionnaires were completed electronically by participants, by means of a participant i-PAD at each study visit.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Adherence to Study Treatment at Weeks 12 and 24
Adherence to treatment was evaluated using a questionnaire assessing adherence and the reasons for not taking drug at the recommended frequency of administration. Participants who had taken the prescribed doses of treatment in the previous 28 days were evaluated.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Fatigue Status Scale (FSS) Score at Weeks 12 and 24
FSS is a questionnaire composed of nine statements on the state of fatigue experienced during the previous week. The answers are within a scale of agreement ranging from 1 to 7, where 1 represents less fatigue and 7 indicates highest fatigue. The total score was obtained summing the number given at each item and it ranges from 7 to 63. An overall score of ≥36 indicates a state of fatigue. Questionnaires were completed electronically by participants, by means of a participant i-PAD at each study visit. Here, negative values indicate improvement in FSS score from baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Adapted Sclerosis Treatment Concerns Questionnaire (MSTCQ) Score at Weeks 12 and 24
MSTCQ is a 20-item questionnaire adapted for 'Peg-interferon Beta 1a' containing two domains: injection system satisfaction (1-9) and side effects (1-11). All questions in the MSTCQ have a five-point response choice, with a minimum possible total score of 20 and a maximum possible total score of 100. Lower total scores indicating better outcomes. Questionnaires were completed electronically by participants, by means of a participant I-PAD at each study visit. Here, negative values indicate improvement in MSTCQ score from baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life Questionnaire (MusiQoL) Score at Week 12 and 24
MusiQoL is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 31 items describing nine dimensions of health-related quality of life (QoL): activities of daily living, psychological wellbeing, symptoms, relationship with friends, relationship with family, sentimental and sexual life, coping rejection, relationship with healthcare system). All items are scored based on frequency/extent of an event on a five-point scale ranging from never/not at all (option 1) to always/very much (option 5). Total score is obtained by linearly transforming and standardizing on a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate a better level of health-related QoL for each dimension and for the global index score. Here, negative values indicate improvement in MusiQoL score from baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at Week 24
Relapses are defined as neurologic symptoms lasting more than 24 hours which occur at least 30 days after the onset of a preceding event. ARR was calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants divided by the total participant-years of exposure to that treatment. Here negative sign indicates decrease in annual relapse rate as compared to baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Percent Change in Relapse-Free Participants at Week 24
Relapses are defined as neurologic symptoms lasting more than 24 hours which occur at least 30 days after the onset of a preceding event. Percent change in relapse-free participants had been calculated with respect to the number of relapse-free participants at baseline. Here, negative sign indicates decrease in number of relapse free participants at specified timepoint as compared to baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can herefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 24
Number of Participants With AE Stratified by Severity
Severity of AEs was evaluated based on the following criteria- Mild: Symptoms barely noticeable to participant or does not make participant uncomfortable; does not influence performance or functioning; prescription drug not ordinarily needed for relief of symptom(s) but may be given because of personality of participant. Moderate: Symptoms of a sufficient severity to make participant uncomfortable; performance of daily activity is influenced; participant is able to continue in study; treatment for symptom(s) may be needed. Severe: Symptoms cause severe discomfort; symptoms cause incapacitation or significant impact on participant's daily life; severity may cause cessation of treatment with study treatment; treatment for symptom(s) may be given and/or participant hospitalized.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Clinical Abnormal Laboratory Values
Participants with clinical abnormal laboratory values were reported throughout the studies.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Study start3 Feb 2016
- Primary completion2 Oct 2017
- Study completion21 Dec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by BiogenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 193 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Biogen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Study director, Biogen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02587065
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ITA-PEG-14-10779
- Other IDs
- 2015-002201-11, 2015
- Acronym
- PLATINUM
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 23 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 31 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicenter Interventional Phase IV Study for the Assessment of the Effects on Patient's Satisfaction of Plegridy (Pre-filled Pen) in Subjects With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis Unsatisfied With Other Injectable Subcutaneous Interferons (PLATINUM)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02587065
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PLATINUM / ITA-PEG-14-10779
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 193 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- BiogenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 3 Feb 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Jan 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to investigate whether Peg-IFN beta-1a improves the satisfaction of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) participants unsatisfied with injectable subcutaneous Interferons, as measured by the Abbreviated Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire to Medication (TSQM-9), at 12 weeks. The secondary objectives of this study are to evaluate in this study population: effects of Peg-IFN beta-1a treatment on participants' satisfaction at 24 weeks; effects of Peg-IFN beta-1a treatment on short-term participants' adherence; effects of Peg-IFN beta-1a treatment on participants' fatigue; effects of Peg-IFN beta-1a on disease activity and physical disability; impact of Peg-IFN beta-1a treatment on participant-reported health-related quality of life; impact of Peg-IFN beta-1a treatment on participants' injection-system satisfaction; Evaluate the relationship between participants' satisfaction and adherence; Evaluate the relationship between participants' satisfaction and social-demographic factors (age, sex, employment working, level of education, etc) and clinical characteristics (annualized relapse rate [ARR], disability, etc.) and to evaluate the treatment safety and tolerability.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| peginterferon beta-1a | Experimental | Drug: peginterferon beta-1a125 μg administered subcutaneously (SC) every 2 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Subjects diagnosed with Relapsing Remitting MS according to 2010 McDonald criteria.
- Subjects with EDSS score between 0.0 and 5.0 at baseline.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
- Have any contra-indications to treatment with Peg-IFN-beta 1a according to the Summary of Product Characteristics.
- NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| peginterferon beta-1aAlso: BIIB017, PEGylated Interferon Beta-1a, Plegridy, PEG IFN β-1a125 mcg administered subcutaneously (SC) every 2 weeks. | Drug | peginterferon beta-1a |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Convenience Satisfaction Score of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire to Medication (TSQM-9) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
TSQM is a 14-item instrument consisting of four scales: effectiveness scale (questions 1 to 3), side effects scale (questions 4 to 8), convenience scale (questions 9 to 11) and global satisfaction scale (questions 12 to 14). In TSQM-9, the five items related to side effects of medication were not included. The scores were computed by adding items for each domain. The lowest possible score was subtracted from this composite score and divided by the greatest possible score minus the lowest possible score. This provided a transformed score between 0 and 1 that was then multiplied by 100. TSQM-9 domain scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing higher satisfaction on that domain. Questionnaires were completed electronically by participants, by means of a participant i-PAD at each study visit.
10 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in the Score of All Domains of TSQM-9 at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Adherence to Study Treatment at Weeks 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Fatigue Status Scale (FSS) Score at Weeks 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Adapted Sclerosis Treatment Concerns Questionnaire (MSTCQ) Score at Weeks 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life Questionnaire (MusiQoL) Score at Week 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Percent Change in Relapse-Free Participants at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Number of Participants With AE Stratified by Severity
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Clinical Abnormal Laboratory Values
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Aug 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate Pharmacokinetics, Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity and Pharmacodynamic Effects of Subcutaneous Ocrelizumab Administration in Children and Adolescents With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)
Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Comparison Between ABP 692 and Ocrevus® (Ocrelizumab)
Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Determining the Effectiveness of earLy Intensive Versus Escalation Approaches for RRMS
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Rocbrutinib in PRL-Positive Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Ocrelizumab in Comparison With Fingolimod in Children and Adolescents With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)
Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director study director
Biogen
30 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing peginterferon beta-1a in people with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS), run by Biogen at 30 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 30 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Jan 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Convenience Satisfaction Score of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire to Medication (TSQM-9) at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline, Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Aug 2023.