Obesity, MorbidEPO2-ANCT02590406
EPO2-A: Evaluation of Pre-Oxygenation in Morbid Obesity: Effect of Position and Positive Pressure Ventilation
A study testing Beach chair (BC) and ZEEP and Reverse Trendelenburg and NIPPV in people with Obesity, Morbid, run by Laval University at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The risk of complication associated with airway in obese patient is important. The result of pre-oxygenation gives the clinician a prolonged non-hypoxic apnea time. The relation between FRC and non-hypoxic apnea time has been correlated. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Obesity, Morbid
- What is being tested?
- Beach chair (BC) and ZEEP and Reverse Trendelenburg and NIPPV
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Sep 2015to Mar 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- BMI > 40
- Abdominal obesity : waist circumference: > 115 for the women waist circumference > 130 for the men
Who cannot join
- Facial hair
- Cranio-facial abnormality
- Asthma (continuous treatment)
- COPD (FEV1 < 80%)
- Severe cardiovascular disease (NYHA > 3)
- Pregnancy
Show all 9Show fewer
- Tobacco use
- Know or suspected difficulty with intubation
- Severe GERD or risk of aspiration
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Québec, Quebec, G1V4G5
About this study
Official title: EPO2-A: Evaluation of Different Pre-Oxygenation Condition in Morbid Obesity: Effect of Position and Positive Pressure Ventilation During General Anesthesia Induction
The risk of complication associated with airway in obese patient is important. The result of pre-oxygenation gives the clinician a prolonged non-hypoxic apnea time. The relation between FRC and non-hypoxic apnea time has been correlated. However, the best condition to accomplish the pre-oxygenation in morbidly obese patient has yet to be described in the medical literature. A study previously done in our hospital (EPO2-PV) compared the effect of different positions and ventilation modes on the FRC in the laboratory. A significant difference has been established on the FRC between the inverse Trendelenburg position with positive pressure ventilation and the head up ("beach-chair") position without positive pressure. The current study, EPO2-A is designed to compared the two positions and ventilation modes during the induction of general anesthesia on morbidly obese and correlate the difference in FRC to difference in apnea time.
Read the detailed description
Obesity prevalence in the population is increasing. Thus a growing number of obese patient need surgical interventions. These patients have a four time higher risk of suffering of serious complication in relation with their airway management compare with non-obese patients. This is explained by an increased incidence of difficulty with the ventilation and intubation of the obese. The time available for the clinician to manage the airway is define by the non hypoxic apnea time. This laps of time is dependent of the oxygen stocks of the patient, which are dependent of the functional residual capacity (FRC) and his oxygen consumption. For a non-obese patient, a normal pre-oxygenation of three minutes at 100% of oxygen allows a non hypoxic apnea time (oxygen saturation > 90%) of 8,9 minutes. However, for the morbidly obese, this time is cut to less than three minutes.
The major goal of the pre-oxygenation is to increase the alveolar partial pressure of oxygen available in the end-expiratory pulmonary volume. This can be done by replacing the nitrogen in the alveolus by oxygen and by increasing the pulmonary stocks, the FRC. It has been demonstrated that the FRC after the induction of anesthesia is cut by half for the obese. This reduction is explained by a diminished thoracic compliance and an increase of the dependent lung regions' atelectasis because of a more cephalic position of the diaphragm.
Various pre-oxygenation methods have been described to prolong the non hypoxic apnea time in the obese population. Some proposed pre-oxygenation strategies with the patient in the head up position (beach chair). It is a position derived from the ramped position described as the best to visualized the obese patients' glottis. Others proposed pre-oxygenation strategies with positive pressure ventilation, but only the supine position has been studied concomitantly.
Individually, these techniques of pre-oxygenation are superior to the combination of supine position and no positive pressure. Indeed, studies demonstrated that the beach chair position (derived from the ramped position) or the positive pressure pre-oxygenation in supine position diminished the time needed to obtain a satisfactory pre-oxygenation (End-expiratory oxygen fraction >0,9) and a longer non hypoxic apnea time. Sill, these strategies have never been combined in the same protocol.
The beach chair position without positive pressure ventilation has become the standard of care because it is the position that allows the best glottis view. Though, it has been shown by Boyce and coll. that the reverse Trendelenburg position, and not the beach chair, increased the non hypoxic apnea time, the recuperation time and the minimal saturation obtained compared to the supine position. We think that there is an advantage to use the reverse Trendelenburg position to optimize the non hypoxic apnea time. Indeed, our hypothesis is that there will be less pressure on the diaphragm in comparison with the beach char position.
A studied realized by our group (EPO2-PV) evaluated the effect of three positions (Reverse Trendelenburg, beach chair and supine) and two ventilation strategies (spontaneous ventilation with or without positive pressure) on morbidly obese FRC in laboratory. The results showed a statistically significant difference on the FRC after a pre-oxygenation with positive pressure compared with the pre-oxygenation without positive pressure, and this regardless of the position. Moreover, for both ventilation strategies, results demonstrated a statistically significant superiority between the FRC obtained after pre-oxygenation in reverse Trendelenburg compared with the beach chair and the supine position. No improvement has been shown with the beach chair position.
Thereby, the current study will try to correlate the FRC results obtained in laboratory in actual non hypoxic apnea time in the operating room. This research design tries to compare, in patient receiving general anesthesia for bariatric surgeries, the effect of the pre-oxygenation with positive pressure and the reverse Trendelenburg position, on the non hypoxic apnea time in comparison with the actual standard of care, beach chair position without positive pressure ventilation.
- Conditions
- Obesity, Morbid
- Being tested
- Beach chair (BC) and ZEEP, Reverse Trendelenburg and NIPPV
- Keywords
- Morbid Obesity, Bariatric Surgery, Pre-Oxygenation, Anesthesia Induction, Positive pressure ventilation, Non hypoxic apnea time, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Anesthesia, General
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity, Morbid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Beach chair (BC) and ZEEPProcedure or surgery
Table Position: Beach chair, Inclination of the upper part of the table at 25 degrees, breaking at the patient's hips ZEEP: 3 minutes pre-oxygenation with tidal volumes, FiO2 100%, mouth piece used as a ventilatory interface
Reverse Trendelenburg and NIPPVProcedure or surgery
Table Position: Reverse Trendelenburg, Inclination of the whole table at 25 degrees from an horizontal plane, head up.
NIPPV: 3 minutes of pre-oxygenation with 8 cm H2O positive pressure and 10 cm H2O PEEP. Trigger set at 1,5 L/min, mouth piece is used as a ventilatory interface
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Beach chair (BC) and ZEEP | Active comparator | Table Position: Beach chair, Inclination of the upper part of the table at 25 degrees, breaking at the patient's hips ZEEP: 3 minutes pre-oxygenation with tidal volumes, FiO2 100%, mouth piece used as a ventilatory interface Receives: Procedure: Beach chair (BC) and ZEEP |
| Reverse Trendelenburg and NIPPV | Experimental | Table Position: Reverse Trendelenburg, Inclination of the whole table at 25 degrees from an horizontal plane, head up.
NIPPV: 3 minutes of pre-oxygenation with 8 cm H2O positive pressure and 10 cm H2O PEEP. Trigger set at 1,5 L/min, mouth piece is used as a ventilatory interface Receives: Procedure: Reverse Trendelenburg and NIPPV |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Non Hypoxic Apnea Time
Change of Non-hypoxic apnea time in obese patient during a General Anesthesia induction, as a result of different pre-oxygenation position and ventilation mode; 1-Beach Chair and No positive pressure ventilation, 2-Reverse Trendelenburg and positive pressure ventilation and PEEP. End of measure time frame is 5 minutes after intubation
Measured: After a 3 minutes pre-oxygenation period
Secondary outcomes (5)
Time to Expired Oxygen Fraction > 0,9
Evaluation of time needed to obtain an expired fraction of oxygen of > 0,9 in the two groups during the pre-oxygenation
Measured: During the pre-oxygenation period
Maximum Expired Fraction of Oxygen Obtained
Evaluation of the maximum expired oxygen fraction obtained in the two groups
Measured: After 3 minutes of pre-oxygenation
Minimum Arterial Saturation of Oxygen Obtained
Evaluation of the minimal saturation obtained after the resumption of the ventilation
Measured: After the end of the Non-hypoxic apnea time
Time to 97% Saturation
Measured: Evaluation of the time needed to the beginning of the ventilation to the moment where the saturation is 97%
Hemodynamic Changes
Evaluation of the changes in vital signs during and after the pre-oxygenation phase in the two combinations of position and ventilation mode
Measured: From the beginning of the pre-oxygenation to the end of the protocol
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2015
- Primary completionJan 2016
- Study completionMar 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (21)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Obesity, MorbidStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Laval UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Laval University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Antony Carrier-Boucher, MD, Principal investigator, Laval UniversityBussières S Jean, MD, Principal investigator, Laval University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02590406
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IUCPQ 21211
- Acronym
- EPO2-A
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 6 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 25 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C; Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):617-31. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer058. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
PubMed 21447488Juvin P, Lavaut E, Dupont H, Lefevre P, Demetriou M, Dumoulin JL, Desmonts JM. Difficult tracheal intubation is more common in obese than in lean patients. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):595-600. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000072547.75928.B0.
PubMed 12873960Langeron O, Masso E, Huraux C, Guggiari M, Bianchi A, Coriat P, Riou B. Prediction of difficult mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2000 May;92(5):1229-36. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200005000-00009.
PubMed 10781266Tanoubi I, Drolet P, Donati F. Optimizing preoxygenation in adults. Can J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;56(6):449-66. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9084-z. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
PubMed 19399574Gambee AM, Hertzka RE, Fisher DM. Preoxygenation techniques: comparison of three minutes and four breaths. Anesth Analg. 1987 May;66(5):468-70. No abstract available.
PubMed 3578856Jense HG, Dubin SA, Silverstein PI, O'Leary-Escolas U. Effect of obesity on safe duration of apnea in anesthetized humans. Anesth Analg. 1991 Jan;72(1):89-93. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199101000-00016.
PubMed 1984382Damia G, Mascheroni D, Croci M, Tarenzi L. Perioperative changes in functional residual capacity in morbidly obese patients. Br J Anaesth. 1988 Apr;60(5):574-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/60.5.574.
PubMed 3377932Pelosi P, Croci M, Ravagnan I, Tredici S, Pedoto A, Lissoni A, Gattinoni L. The effects of body mass on lung volumes, respiratory mechanics, and gas exchange during general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1998 Sep;87(3):654-60. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199809000-00031.
PubMed 9728848Altermatt FR, Munoz HR, Delfino AE, Cortinez LI. Pre-oxygenation in the obese patient: effects of position on tolerance to apnoea. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Nov;95(5):706-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei231. Epub 2005 Sep 2.
PubMed 16143575Boyce JR, Ness T, Castroman P, Gleysteen JJ. A preliminary study of the optimal anesthesia positioning for the morbidly obese patient. Obes Surg. 2003 Feb;13(1):4-9. doi: 10.1381/096089203321136511.
PubMed 12630606Lane S, Saunders D, Schofield A, Padmanabhan R, Hildreth A, Laws D. A prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy of pre-oxygenation in the 20 degrees head-up vs supine position. Anaesthesia. 2005 Nov;60(11):1064-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04374.x.
PubMed 16229689Collins JS, Lemmens HJ, Brodsky JB, Brock-Utne JG, Levitan RM. Laryngoscopy and morbid obesity: a comparison of the "sniff" and "ramped" positions. Obes Surg. 2004 Oct;14(9):1171-5. doi: 10.1381/0960892042386869.
PubMed 15527629Levitan RM, Mechem CC, Ochroch EA, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. Head-elevated laryngoscopy position: improving laryngeal exposure during laryngoscopy by increasing head elevation. Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Mar;41(3):322-30. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.87.
PubMed 12605198Coussa M, Proietti S, Schnyder P, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Prevention of atelectasis formation during the induction of general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2004 May;98(5):1491-5, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000111743.61132.99.
PubMed 15105237Cressey DM, Berthoud MC, Reilly CS. Effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure to enhance pre-oxygenation in morbidly obese women. Anaesthesia. 2001 Jul;56(7):680-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01374-3.x.
PubMed 11437771
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- EPO2-A: Evaluation of Different Pre-Oxygenation Condition in Morbid Obesity: Effect of Position and Positive Pressure Ventilation During General Anesthesia Induction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02590406
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EPO2-A / IUCPQ 21211
- Conditions
- Obesity, Morbid
- Keywords
- Morbid Obesity, Bariatric Surgery, Pre-Oxygenation, Anesthesia Induction, Positive pressure ventilation, Non hypoxic apnea time, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Anesthesia, General
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Laval UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2015
- Primary completion
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Mar 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The risk of complication associated with airway in obese patient is important. The result of pre-oxygenation gives the clinician a prolonged non-hypoxic apnea time. The relation between FRC and non-hypoxic apnea time has been correlated. However, the best condition to accomplish the pre-oxygenation in morbidly obese patient has yet to be described in the medical literature. A study previously done in our hospital (EPO2-PV) compared the effect of different positions and ventilation modes on the FRC in the laboratory. A significant difference has been established on the FRC between the inverse Trendelenburg position with positive pressure ventilation and the head up ("beach-chair") position without positive pressure. The current study, EPO2-A is designed to compared the two positions and ventilation modes during the induction of general anesthesia on morbidly obese and correlate the difference in FRC to difference in apnea time.
Detailed description
Obesity prevalence in the population is increasing. Thus a growing number of obese patient need surgical interventions. These patients have a four time higher risk of suffering of serious complication in relation with their airway management compare with non-obese patients. This is explained by an increased incidence of difficulty with the ventilation and intubation of the obese. The time available for the clinician to manage the airway is define by the non hypoxic apnea time. This laps of time is dependent of the oxygen stocks of the patient, which are dependent of the functional residual capacity (FRC) and his oxygen consumption. For a non-obese patient, a normal pre-oxygenation of three minutes at 100% of oxygen allows a non hypoxic apnea time (oxygen saturation > 90%) of 8,9 minutes. However, for the morbidly obese, this time is cut to less than three minutes.
The major goal of the pre-oxygenation is to increase the alveolar partial pressure of oxygen available in the end-expiratory pulmonary volume. This can be done by replacing the nitrogen in the alveolus by oxygen and by increasing the pulmonary stocks, the FRC. It has been demonstrated that the FRC after the induction of anesthesia is cut by half for the obese. This reduction is explained by a diminished thoracic compliance and an increase of the dependent lung regions' atelectasis because of a more cephalic position of the diaphragm.
Various pre-oxygenation methods have been described to prolong the non hypoxic apnea time in the obese population. Some proposed pre-oxygenation strategies with the patient in the head up position (beach chair). It is a position derived from the ramped position described as the best to visualized the obese patients' glottis. Others proposed pre-oxygenation strategies with positive pressure ventilation, but only the supine position has been studied concomitantly.
Individually, these techniques of pre-oxygenation are superior to the combination of supine position and no positive pressure. Indeed, studies demonstrated that the beach chair position (derived from the ramped position) or the positive pressure pre-oxygenation in supine position diminished the time needed to obtain a satisfactory pre-oxygenation (End-expiratory oxygen fraction >0,9) and a longer non hypoxic apnea time. Sill, these strategies have never been combined in the same protocol.
The beach chair position without positive pressure ventilation has become the standard of care because it is the position that allows the best glottis view. Though, it has been shown by Boyce and coll. that the reverse Trendelenburg position, and not the beach chair, increased the non hypoxic apnea time, the recuperation time and the minimal saturation obtained compared to the supine position. We think that there is an advantage to use the reverse Trendelenburg position to optimize the non hypoxic apnea time. Indeed, our hypothesis is that there will be less pressure on the diaphragm in comparison with the beach char position.
A studied realized by our group (EPO2-PV) evaluated the effect of three positions (Reverse Trendelenburg, beach chair and supine) and two ventilation strategies (spontaneous ventilation with or without positive pressure) on morbidly obese FRC in laboratory. The results showed a statistically significant difference on the FRC after a pre-oxygenation with positive pressure compared with the pre-oxygenation without positive pressure, and this regardless of the position. Moreover, for both ventilation strategies, results demonstrated a statistically significant superiority between the FRC obtained after pre-oxygenation in reverse Trendelenburg compared with the beach chair and the supine position. No improvement has been shown with the beach chair position.
Thereby, the current study will try to correlate the FRC results obtained in laboratory in actual non hypoxic apnea time in the operating room. This research design tries to compare, in patient receiving general anesthesia for bariatric surgeries, the effect of the pre-oxygenation with positive pressure and the reverse Trendelenburg position, on the non hypoxic apnea time in comparison with the actual standard of care, beach chair position without positive pressure ventilation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Beach chair (BC) and ZEEP | Active comparator | Procedure: Beach chair (BC) and ZEEPTable Position: Beach chair, Inclination of the upper part of the table at 25 degrees, breaking at the patient's hips ZEEP: 3 minutes pre-oxygenation with tidal volumes, FiO2 100%, mouth piece used as a ventilatory interface |
| Reverse Trendelenburg and NIPPV | Experimental | Procedure: Reverse Trendelenburg and NIPPVTable Position: Reverse Trendelenburg, Inclination of the whole table at 25 degrees from an horizontal plane, head up. NIPPV: 3 minutes of pre-oxygenation with 8 cm H2O positive pressure and 10 cm H2O PEEP. Trigger set at 1,5 L/min, mouth piece is used as a ventilatory interface |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- BMI > 40
- Abdominal obesity : waist circumference: > 115 for the women waist circumference > 130 for the men
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Facial hair
- Cranio-facial abnormality
- Asthma (continuous treatment)
- COPD (FEV1 < 80%)
- Severe cardiovascular disease (NYHA > 3)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Beach chair (BC) and ZEEPTable Position: Beach chair, Inclination of the upper part of the table at 25 degrees, breaking at the patient's hips ZEEP: 3 minutes pre-oxygenation with tidal volumes, FiO2 100%, mouth piece used as a ventilatory interface | Procedure or surgery | Beach chair (BC) and ZEEP |
| Reverse Trendelenburg and NIPPVTable Position: Reverse Trendelenburg, Inclination of the whole table at 25 degrees from an horizontal plane, head up. NIPPV: 3 minutes of pre-oxygenation with 8 cm H2O positive pressure and 10 cm H2O PEEP. Trigger set at 1,5 L/min, mouth piece is used as a ventilatory interface | Procedure or surgery | Reverse Trendelenburg and NIPPV |
Primary outcome
Non Hypoxic Apnea Time
Time frame: After a 3 minutes pre-oxygenation period
Change of Non-hypoxic apnea time in obese patient during a General Anesthesia induction, as a result of different pre-oxygenation position and ventilation mode; 1-Beach Chair and No positive pressure ventilation, 2-Reverse Trendelenburg and positive pressure ventilation and PEEP. End of measure time frame is 5 minutes after intubation
5 secondary outcomes
Time to Expired Oxygen Fraction > 0,9
Time frame: During the pre-oxygenation period
Maximum Expired Fraction of Oxygen Obtained
Time frame: After 3 minutes of pre-oxygenation
Minimum Arterial Saturation of Oxygen Obtained
Time frame: After the end of the Non-hypoxic apnea time
Time to 97% Saturation
Time frame: Evaluation of the time needed to the beginning of the ventilation to the moment where the saturation is 97%
Hemodynamic Changes
Time frame: From the beginning of the pre-oxygenation to the end of the protocol
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Mar 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 21447488Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C; Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):617-31. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer058. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
- Background: PubMed 12873960Juvin P, Lavaut E, Dupont H, Lefevre P, Demetriou M, Dumoulin JL, Desmonts JM. Difficult tracheal intubation is more common in obese than in lean patients. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):595-600. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000072547.75928.B0.
- Background: PubMed 10781266Langeron O, Masso E, Huraux C, Guggiari M, Bianchi A, Coriat P, Riou B. Prediction of difficult mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2000 May;92(5):1229-36. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200005000-00009.
- Background: PubMed 19399574Tanoubi I, Drolet P, Donati F. Optimizing preoxygenation in adults. Can J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;56(6):449-66. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9084-z. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
- Background: PubMed 3578856Gambee AM, Hertzka RE, Fisher DM. Preoxygenation techniques: comparison of three minutes and four breaths. Anesth Analg. 1987 May;66(5):468-70. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 1984382Jense HG, Dubin SA, Silverstein PI, O'Leary-Escolas U. Effect of obesity on safe duration of apnea in anesthetized humans. Anesth Analg. 1991 Jan;72(1):89-93. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199101000-00016.
- Background: PubMed 3377932Damia G, Mascheroni D, Croci M, Tarenzi L. Perioperative changes in functional residual capacity in morbidly obese patients. Br J Anaesth. 1988 Apr;60(5):574-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/60.5.574.
- Background: PubMed 9728848Pelosi P, Croci M, Ravagnan I, Tredici S, Pedoto A, Lissoni A, Gattinoni L. The effects of body mass on lung volumes, respiratory mechanics, and gas exchange during general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1998 Sep;87(3):654-60. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199809000-00031.
- Background: PubMed 16143575Altermatt FR, Munoz HR, Delfino AE, Cortinez LI. Pre-oxygenation in the obese patient: effects of position on tolerance to apnoea. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Nov;95(5):706-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei231. Epub 2005 Sep 2.
- Background: PubMed 12630606Boyce JR, Ness T, Castroman P, Gleysteen JJ. A preliminary study of the optimal anesthesia positioning for the morbidly obese patient. Obes Surg. 2003 Feb;13(1):4-9. doi: 10.1381/096089203321136511.
- Background: PubMed 16229689Lane S, Saunders D, Schofield A, Padmanabhan R, Hildreth A, Laws D. A prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy of pre-oxygenation in the 20 degrees head-up vs supine position. Anaesthesia. 2005 Nov;60(11):1064-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04374.x.
- Background: PubMed 15527629Collins JS, Lemmens HJ, Brodsky JB, Brock-Utne JG, Levitan RM. Laryngoscopy and morbid obesity: a comparison of the "sniff" and "ramped" positions. Obes Surg. 2004 Oct;14(9):1171-5. doi: 10.1381/0960892042386869.
Related trials for Obesity, Morbid
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pilot Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of OPTILENE® SILVER MESH ELASTIC in Prevention of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) and Incisional Hernia (IH)
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Morbid Obesity
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Evaluating Metabolic Health in Individuals With Extreme Obesity
BMI>40
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Bariatric Surgery Registry
Obesity, Morbid
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Serum Estradiol and Endometrial Thickness After Bariatric Surgery in Postmenopausal Women With Obesity
Obesity, Morbid, Postmenopause
Active, not recruiting
Mindfulness Based Eating Awareness Training for Bariatric Surgery Patients
Obesity, Morbid, Eating Disorder Symptom
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Antony Carrier-Boucher, MD principal investigator
Laval University
Bussières S Jean, MD principal investigator
Laval University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Beach chair (BC) and ZEEP and Reverse Trendelenburg and NIPPV in people with Obesity, Morbid, run by Laval University at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Mar 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Non Hypoxic Apnea Time (time frame: After a 3 minutes pre-oxygenation period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02590406, which also lists 21 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Mar 2020.