AzTrials
AzTrials

Vitamin D DeficiencyNCT02590614

Genetic, Dietary and Environmental Influences on Vitamin D Metabolism

A study testing 800 IU Vitamin D in people with Vitamin D Deficiency, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Determine differences in serum vitamin D metabolism by genetic ancestry. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 35 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Vitamin D Deficiency
What is being tested?
800 IU Vitamin D
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
412 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Nov 2013to 24 Apr 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 35 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy African American and Caucasian adult volunteers
  • Aged 18 to 35
  • At least 50% African American or at least 50% Caucasian
  • Willing to take a vitamin D supplement for two months
  • Willing to attend monthly visits to the clinic for blood draw and vital check
  • Willing to refrain from taking other dietary supplements including herbal supplements, multi-vitamins and vitamin D supplements other than the supplements provided in the trial.
  • Willing to avoid tanning bed use during the above mentioned period.
  • Willing to avoid extensive use of analgesics and have the consumption of the following drugs recorded: Acetaminophen, Celecoxib, Codeine, Fentanyl, any antibiotics, and Hormonal IUD.

Who cannot join

  • Participants with a fever (100 degrees F or higher) at the time of the visit
  • Participants with severe chronic disease (i.e., chronic kidney disease, cirrhosis of the liver, heart attack, HIV/AIDS, alcoholism, hemophilia, sickle cell disease, or other serious underlying illness that prevents blood donation),
  • Participants that have received radiation therapy or chemotherapy within the past 4 weeks,
  • Participants with any of the following on the upper right arm: rashes, a cast, swelling, paralysis, open sores or wounds.
  • Individuals with blindness and/or deafness
  • Pregnant participants will be excluded from the study.
Show all 23Show fewer
  • Participants taking any of the following medications will be excluded from the study:
  • Long-term antibiotic use: Clarithromycin, Ciprofloxacin, Erythromycin, Telithromycin, Nafcillin
  • Chemotherapy for cancer
  • Prescription vitamin supplement
  • Anti-convulsants: Carbamazepine, Pentobarbital, Phenobarbital, Phenytoin, Primidone, Fosphenytoin
  • Erectile dysfunction drugs: sildenafil, vardenafil, tadalafil
  • Immunosuppressants: Tacrolimus, Cyclosporine A, Sirolimus, Mycophenolate, Glucocorticoids (like Dexamethasone)
  • Proton-pump inhibitors: omeprazole lansoprazole, dexlansoprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole, and esomeprazole
  • Calcium Channel Blockers: nifedipine, felodipine, isradipine, nicardipine, nifedipine, nisoldipine, amlodipine, lacidipine, Verapamil, diltiazem
  • Diuretics : furosemide, bumetanide, torsemide, ethacrynic acid, amiloride, triamterene, spironolactone, eplerenone,
  • Statins: lovastatin, simvastatin, atorvastatin, Pravastatin, fluvastatin, rosuvastatin, pitavastatin, Orlistat (Xenical, Alli),
  • Anti-fungal: Itraconazole, Ketoconazole, Posaconazole, Voriconazole, Fluconazole, Isavuconazole (isavuconazonium sulfate) Clotrimazole
  • HIV protease inhibitors and other anti-retrovirals : Atazanavir, Boceprevir, Darunavir, Indinavir, Lopinavir, Nelfinavir, Ombitasvirparitaprevirritonavir, Ombitasvirparitaprevirritonavir plus dasabuvir, Ritonavir and ritonavir containing coformulations, Saquinavir, Telaprevir
  • TB medications: Rifabutin, Rifampin (rifampicin), Rifapentine
  • As well as CYP3A4 inhibitors including: Ceritinib, Cobicistat and cobicistat containing coformulations, Idelalisib, Nefazodone, Amiodarone, Aprepitant, Cimetidine, Conivaptan, Crizotinib, Delavirdine, Desipramine, Dronedarone, Fosaprepitant Mifepristone, Netupitant, Nilotinib, and Tibolone
  • As well as CYP3A4 inducers including: Dexamethasone, Enzalutamide, Lumacaftor, Mitotane, St. John's wort, Bexarotene, Bosentan, Dabrafenib, Efavirenz, Eslicarbazepine, Etravirine, Modafinil
  • Other drugs that will cause a participant to be excluded include: Cholestyramine, Ferric carboxymaltose (treatment of iron deficiency anemia), Dapsone, Metformin

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Penn State Clinical Research Center

    University Park, Pennsylvania, 16802

Other trials in United States

About this study

Determine differences in serum vitamin D metabolism by genetic ancestry.

Read the detailed description

Vitamin D metabolites are well-recognized to stop cancer cell growth in culture. However, a clear definition of a sufficient level of serum vitamin D (currently measured as 25(OH)D) for disease prevention has been hampered by inconsistent results from both observational studies and randomized clinical trials. Observational cancer studies report both increased and reduced risks of cancer in subjects with higher serum levels of 25(OH)D, while large randomized trials report no significant benefit of vitamin D supplementation for breast cancer (incidence), colon cancer (incidence and mortality), lung cancer (mortality), or benign proliferative breast disease.

The 25(OH)D metabolite of vitamin D (comprised of 25(OH)D3 and 25(OH)D2), is the principal hydroxylated metabolite in serum and is considered a reasonable functional biomarker of vitamin D status. This is because, although subject to seasonal variation, multiple measurements in the same individual are relatively consistent over time. The most biologically active vitamin D metabolite is 1,25(OH)2D3, and may therefore be the most relevant to long-term health outcomes. Nonetheless, 1,25(OH)2D3 is not frequently used as a biomarker in epidemiologic studies as it displays diurnal variation and has a short in vivo half life.

Notably, in vivo treatment with 1,25(OH)2D3 is associated with increased metabolic clearance of 25(OH)D3, decreased serum 25(OH)D3 levels, and a higher 25(OH)D3 to 24,25(OH)2D3 conversion rate in humans and animals. This suggests that use of 25(OH)D as single biomarker of vitamin D status does not fully capture the entire picture. Paradoxically, one individual may be classified with 'low' 25(OH)D as a consequence of low dietary intake and little sun exposure while yet another individual classified with 'low' 25(OH)D may actually have a higher concentration of the 1,25(OH)2D3 metabolite-possibly due to genetic differences in enzymes that metabolize vitamin D (CYP2R1, CYP27B1, and CYP24A1).

Genome-wide and candidate gene association studies of serum 25(OH)D levels have suggested a role of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) near the vitamin D binding protein (GC) and CYP2R1. However, the investigators and others have shown that serum 25(OH)D levels are also associated with genetic ancestry. Because existing studies do not adjust for genetic ancestry and the function of these SNPs have yet to be established, it is not known whether these SNPs actually play a role or whether these may be spurious associations due to ancestral background (i.e., population stratification), correlations with truly causal SNPs, or to random chance. In addition, because of the number of SNPs that must be distinguished, genome-wide studies do not capture regions with high homology or sequence repeats, such as the promoter region of CYP24A1 which has a higher guanine-cytosine content. Improved classification of 'low' 25(OH)D levels within the context of a particular genetic background through identification of "rapid" versus "slow" vitamin D metabolizers will likely have important implications for cancer risk.

It is well-recognized that individuals with African Ancestry have substantially lower (~2-fold) serum 25(OH)D levels compared with other racial/ethnic groups. These differences have been attributed primarily to skin pigmentation. However, the relation between serum 25(OH)D levels and health outcomes is complex and involves a number of variables including diet, sun exposure and hormone status. For example, despite lower average dietary intake of both calcium and vitamin D, and lower serum 25(OH)D levels, African Americans have higher bone mineral density and a 3-fold lower risk of hip fracture relative to European Americans. There are some lines of evidence which suggest that African Americans may have comparatively higher circulating levels of 1,25(OH)2D3, although most studies are small and do not account for age and/or diurnal variation, and this may explain why other studies report no difference.

Among Europeans alone, a moderately high heritability of serum 25(OH)D levels (~50 to 70% for 25(OH)D) has been observed, as well as associations between 25(OH)D and several genetic polymorphisms in vitamin D metabolizing enzymes, although the functional consequences of these polymorphisms are not known. Small and large clinical trials among healthy individuals have also noted substantial inter-individual differences(as much as 5-fold) in the increases of serum 25(OH)D levels among participants given the same oral dose of vitamin D, the same minimal erythema dose (MED) of UV-B light, or the same dose of UV light. The importance of understanding inter-individual differences in vitamin D synthesis, metabolism and effect have been underscored by results from high dose randomized trials reporting that those in the vitamin D supplementation groups experienced a 31% higher bone fracture incidence, and significantly lower prostate cancer survival. There is a clear need to understand individual differences in the metabolism of vitamin D before future high dose trials proceed.

Previous Data: Studies by the investigators' lab and others have identified significant racial/ethnic differences in the frequency of variants in genes responsible for vitamin D metabolism (i.e., CYP2R1, CYP27B1 and CYP24A1). In collaboration with the Pike Laboratory (University of Wisconsin), the investigators' laboratory has identified several novel genetic variants in recently identified regulatory regions of the gene which encodes for the major vitamin D catabolic enzyme (CYP24A1).

Study Rationale:The role/function of these polymorphisms has not been tested in either epidemiologic association studies or in cell-based assays. It will be important to complement genetic association studies with multiple types of molecular assays that can tell a consistent story about the likely role of a particular genetic variant.

The investigators hypothesize that there is a significant influence of genetic variants on serum vitamin D metabolism that is independent of genetic ancestry, skin melanin content, sunlight exposure and dietary/supplement intake.

Study Objectives:A small randomized study in healthy subjects will investigate temporal changes in the balance of metabolites (25(OH)D3, 25(OH)D2, 24,25(OH)2D3 and 1,25(OH)2D3) following a two-month course of vitamin D3 (800 IU/d).

This study overcomes limitations of existing genetic association studies that may report spurious results due to lack of control for genetic ancestry, skin reflectance, collection of blood specimens during summer months, or the use of assays that do not distinguish 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3. The advantages of this study are: 1) a matched design that incorporates temporal assessment of vitamin D metabolism, 2) genetic Ancestry Informative Markers (AIMs), 3) melanin skin index, 4) a sensitive and reliable assay for four serum vitamin D metabolites, and 5) functional molecular assays related to specific genetic polymorphisms.

The investigators' research addresses one of the major research gaps in the understanding of the health-related benefits of vitamin D identified by a recent Institute of Medicine Review. While vitamin D metabolites have significant anti-cancer properties, a better understanding of the genetic influences upon vitamin D metabolism is needed in order to improve the identification of cancer risks associated with vitamin D.

Study Design: This study employs two designs-first a cross-sectional study of participants is selected.

Among the cross-sectional study participants, a subset is randomly selected and matched based on genetic ancestry, and randomized to either the intervention (800 IU/day of vitamin d) or placebo group.

Statistical Plan:In the first portion of this study, an estimated 400 participants will be screened to determine eligibility. Eligibility screening will be completed online through RedCap.

In the second portion of this study, participants randomly chosen from the original 400 for the Supplement Intervention Study will be asked to complete 3 additional blood draws at Week 0, 4 and 8 of the Supplement Intervention Study (N=64).

The 64 Supplement Intervention study participants will be randomly chosen from the eligible participants in the first part of the study (n=400). Sample size calculations were performed by Dr. Vernon Chinchilli in order to estimate the number of participants that the investigators would need in order to detect differences in their vitamin D levels. The investigators accounted for loss-to-follow-up and normal withdrawal from the study.

NOTE:

The total participants that will get screened has been changed (from the original AICR grant) and revised in the budget from 300 to 400 participants. The investigators made this revision because the investigators decided that loss to follow-up may be higher than the originally estimated 10%. The investigators then estimated that loss to follow-up may actually be closer to 20%. This proportional difference was calculated from the investigators' original estimate of 52 to 64 (which is about 24% increase in participants) and was revised also to increase the amount of participants that the investigators will screen from the original 300 to an estimated 372 (determined proportionally with a 24% increase). The investigators went ahead and assumed that the upper limit may include 400 participants so that the investigators can end up with 64 participants in the supplementation trial.

The investigators will conduct an intention-to-treat analysis to analyze differences in the serum level of vitamin D metabolites and vitamin D metabolite ratios within supplement and placebo group pairs at times 0, 1 month and 2 months. Differences in the pairwise log concentration of metabolites and log metabolite ratios will be tested by Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests and linear mixed-effect models (SAS Proc Mixed) using restricted maximum likelihood estimation to account for one time point as well as repeated measures of vitamin D metabolites. Potential confounding and effect modification by dietary intake of vitamin D will be assessed.

Being tested
800 IU Vitamin D, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Vitamin D Deficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 800 IU Vitamin DDietary supplement

    Also called Vital Nutrients

    Among the cross-sectional study participants, a subset is randomly selected and matched based on genetic ancestry, and randomized to the intervention group.

  • PlaceboDietary supplement

    Also called Vital Nutrients Placebo

    Among the cross-sectional study participants, a subset is randomly selected and matched based on genetic ancestry, and randomized to the placebo group

Study groups in NCT02590614
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
800 IU Vitamin DExperimentalParticipants will be taking 800 IU/d of vitamin D3 for two months
Receives: Dietary Supplement: 800 IU Vitamin D
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo made by Vital Nutrients, Inc. to look exactly like the 800 IU/d caplets by the same company.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Serum concentrations of 25(OH)D3

    Differences in the increase in fasting serum levels of vitamin D metabolite 25(OH)D3 between African American and European American ancestry pairs will be determined at 0, 1 and 2 months.

    Measured: Three month change

  2. Serum concentrations of 24,25(OH)2D3

    Differences in the increase in fasting serum levels of vitamin D metabolite 24,25(OH)D3 between African American and European American ancestry pairs will be determined at 0, 1 and 2 months.

    Measured: Three month change

  3. Serum concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3

    Differences in the increase in fasting serum levels of vitamin D metabolite 1,25(OH)D3 between African American and European American ancestry pairs will be determined at 0, 1 and 2 months.

    Measured: Three month change

  4. Metabolite Ratio

    Difference in the upstream to downstream vitamin D metabolite ratios (24,25(OH)2D3 to 25(OH)D3 and 1,25(OH)2D3 to 25(OH)D3) between African American and European American ancestry pairs will be determined at 0, 1 and 2 months.

    Measured: Three months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Oct 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2013
  3. Primary completionMay 2018
  4. Study completion24 Apr 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
412 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02590614
Sponsor's protocol ID
209517-REV1
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
26 Oct 2015
Last updated
8 May 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Ahn J, Yu K, Stolzenberg-Solomon R, Simon KC, McCullough ML, Gallicchio L, Jacobs EJ, Ascherio A, Helzlsouer K, Jacobs KB, Li Q, Weinstein SJ, Purdue M, Virtamo J, Horst R, Wheeler W, Chanock S, Hunter DJ, Hayes RB, Kraft P, Albanes D. Genome-wide association study of circulating vitamin D levels. Hum Mol Genet. 2010 Jul 1;19(13):2739-45. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq155. Epub 2010 Apr 23.

    PubMed 20418485
  • Al-Delaimy WK, Jansen EH, Peeters PH, van der Laan JD, van Noord PA, Boshuizen HC, van der Schouw YT, Jenab M, Ferrari P, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB. Reliability of biomarkers of iron status, blood lipids, oxidative stress, vitamin D, C-reactive protein and fructosamine in two Dutch cohorts. Biomarkers. 2006 Jul-Aug;11(4):370-82. doi: 10.1080/13547500600799748.

    PubMed 16908443
  • Aronov PA, Hall LM, Dettmer K, Stephensen CB, Hammock BD. Metabolic profiling of major vitamin D metabolites using Diels-Alder derivatization and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008 Jul;391(5):1917-30. doi: 10.1007/s00216-008-2095-8. Epub 2008 Apr 24.

    PubMed 18437365
  • Barnholtz-Sloan JS, McEvoy B, Shriver MD, Rebbeck TR. Ancestry estimation and correction for population stratification in molecular epidemiologic association studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Mar;17(3):471-7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0491. No abstract available.

    PubMed 18349264
  • Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Shetty PB, Guan X, Nyante SJ, Luo J, Brennan DJ, Millikan RC. FGFR2 and other loci identified in genome-wide association studies are associated with breast cancer in African-American and younger women. Carcinogenesis. 2010 Aug;31(8):1417-23. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq128. Epub 2010 Jun 16.

    PubMed 20554749
  • Bell NH, Shaw S, Turner RT. Evidence that 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits the hepatic production of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in man. J Clin Invest. 1984 Oct;74(4):1540-4. doi: 10.1172/JCI111568.

    PubMed 6332830
  • Birlea SA, Costin GE, Norris DA. Cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in the action of vitamin D analogs targeting vitiligo depigmentation. Curr Drug Targets. 2008 Apr;9(4):345-59. doi: 10.2174/138945008783954970.

    PubMed 18393827
  • Boyan BD, Hurst-Kennedy J, Denison TA, Schwartz Z. 24R,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [24R,25(OH)2D3] controls growth plate development by inhibiting apoptosis in the reserve zone and stimulating response to 1alpha,25(OH)2D3 in hypertrophic cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2010 Jul;121(1-2):212-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2010.03.057. Epub 2010 Mar 20.

    PubMed 20307662
  • Braun MM, Helzlsouer KJ, Hollis BW, Comstock GW. Colon cancer and serum vitamin D metabolite levels 10-17 years prior to diagnosis. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Sep 15;142(6):608-11. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117682.

    PubMed 7653469
  • Brazerol WF, McPhee AJ, Mimouni F, Specker BL, Tsang RC. Serial ultraviolet B exposure and serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D response in young adult American blacks and whites: no racial differences. J Am Coll Nutr. 1988 Apr;7(2):111-8. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1988.10720227.

    PubMed 3361035
  • Brouwer DA, van Beek J, Ferwerda H, Brugman AM, van der Klis FR, van der Heiden HJ, Muskiet FA. Rat adipose tissue rapidly accumulates and slowly releases an orally-administered high vitamin D dose. Br J Nutr. 1998 Jun;79(6):527-32. doi: 10.1079/bjn19980091.

    PubMed 9771340
  • Bu FX, Armas L, Lappe J, Zhou Y, Gao G, Wang HW, Recker R, Zhao LJ. Comprehensive association analysis of nine candidate genes with serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels among healthy Caucasian subjects. Hum Genet. 2010 Nov;128(5):549-56. doi: 10.1007/s00439-010-0881-9. Epub 2010 Sep 1.

    PubMed 20809279
  • Chen TC. Photobiology of Vitamin D. In: Holick MF, ed. Vitamin D: Physiology, Molecular Biology, and Clinical Implications. Towtowa, NJ: Humana Press, Inc.; 1999.

  • Chlebowski RT, Johnson KC, Kooperberg C, Pettinger M, Wactawski-Wende J, Rohan T, Rossouw J, Lane D, O'Sullivan MJ, Yasmeen S, Hiatt RA, Shikany JM, Vitolins M, Khandekar J, Hubbell FA; Women's Health Initiative Investigators. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Nov 19;100(22):1581-91. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn360. Epub 2008 Nov 11.

    PubMed 19001601
  • Chung M, Balk EM, Brendel M, Ip S, Lau J, Lee J, Lichtenstein A, Patel K, Raman G, Tatsioni A, Terasawa T, Trikalinos TA. Vitamin D and calcium: a systematic review of health outcomes. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Aug;(183):1-420.

    PubMed 20629479

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing 800 IU Vitamin D in people with Vitamin D Deficiency, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Serum concentrations of 25(OH)D3 (time frame: Three month change). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02590614, which also lists 65 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in