Autism Spectrum DisorderNCT02591446
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies in Autism Spectrum Disorders
An observational study of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disability, run by Rhode Island Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is the most prevalent of the developmental disorders and their incidence is rising. However, the variability in the behavioral symptoms is large. In part for these reasons, the ASD clinical diagnosis is challenging and often is not made until 3-5 years of age. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 45 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Intellectual Disability
- How many people
- 48 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2014to 7 Aug 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 45 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Study population: We will study a total of 120 individuals with ASD. We will also evaluate a total of 120 controls. Ages 6 - 45
Who may be able to join
- For ASD group: Clinical diagnosis of a disorder on the autism spectrum according to:
- DSM 5 criteria
- Assessment using the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised
- Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule.
- For the Control group:
- No history of ASD or other developmental delay
Show all 11Show fewer
- No history of ASD or other developmental delay in first degree relatives.
- For the group of individuals with Intellectual Disability: Mild to moderate intellectual disability with IQ < 70, but with no ASD.
- Age range: 6-45
- IQ: High functioning individuals will have an IQ>90; Low functioning individuals will have an IQ < 70 with mild-moderate intellectual disability.
- Informed consent (and if needed parental assent).
Who cannot join
- Intracranial pathology, cerebral palsy, history of severe head injury, or significant dysmorphology;
- History of fainting spells of unknown or undetermined etiology that might constitute seizures;
- History of seizures, diagnosis of epilepsy, or immediate (1st degree relative) family history epilepsy;
- Any progressive (e.g., neurodegenerative) neurological disorder;
- Chronic (particularly) uncontrolled medical conditions that may cause a medical emergency in case of a provoked seizure (cardiac malformation, cardiac dysrhythmia, asthma, etc.);
- Metal implants (excluding dental fillings);
Show all 19Show fewer
- Pacemaker;
- Implanted medication pump;
- Vagal nerve stimulator;
- Deep brain stimulator;
- TENS unit (unless removed completely for the study);
- Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt;
- Signs of increased intracranial pressure;
- Intracranial lesion (including incidental finding on MRI);
- History of head injury resulting in prolonged loss of consciousness;
- Substance abuse or dependence within the past six months;
- Chronic treatment with prescription medications that decrease cortical seizure threshold
- Pregnancy
- Control participants will be excluded from taking part in the study if they have diagnosis of psychiatric condition and if they have family history for ASD.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Bradley Hospital
East Providence, Rhode Island, 02915
About this study
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is the most prevalent of the developmental disorders and their incidence is rising. However, the variability in the behavioral symptoms is large. In part for these reasons, the ASD clinical diagnosis is challenging and often is not made until 3-5 years of age. Thus, there remains an unmet need for a valid and reliable marker which would facilitate ASD diagnosis early in life, enable efficient study of ASD risk factors, and eventually serve as a useful marker to inform the development of effective therapies and assess treatment response in future clinical trials. The specific brain based marker that investigators are currently evaluating is brain plasticity (the changes that occur in your brain through experience). Investigators measure brain plasticity using noninvasive brain stimulation including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) combined with brain imaging, EEG, and behavioral outcome measures. Their work to date demonstrates the potential utility of these techniques in higher-functioning adolescents and adults with ASD, and pilot data support the feasibility and safety of applying the same measures to children and lower functioning individuals.
In this study, investigators will evaluate the validity of this marker in low- and high-functioning adults with ASD, in low- and high-functioning children with ASD, and assess the reliability of this marker.
Read the detailed description
The clinical, social and financial burden of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is staggering. They are the most prevalent of the developmental disorders and their incidence is rising. However, the ASD phenotype variability is large, and ASD symptoms can manifest over a range of ages and to different degrees. In part for these reasons, the ASD clinical diagnosis is challenging and often is not made until 3-5 years of age. Thus, there remains an unmet need for a valid and reliable endophenotype which would facilitate ASD diagnosis early in life, enable efficient study of ASD risk factors, and eventually serve as a useful biomarker to inform the development of effective therapies and assess treatment response in future clinical trials. The overarching goal of this proposal is to explore the utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures of brain plasticity as a novel neurophysiologic endophenotype in high- and low-functioning adults and children with ASD.
Investigators' work to date demonstrates the potential utility of these measures in higher-functioning adults with ASD, and pilot data support the feasibility and safety of applying the same measures to children and lower functioning individuals in whom the value of such an endophenotype would be particularly high. Investigators thus propose to apply single-pulse TMS to evaluate the modulation in corticospinal reactivity induced by a specific repetitive TMS protocol known as theta burst stimulation (TBS). The comparison of the motor responses induced by single-pulse TMS before and following TBS is a unique noninvasive measure of brain plasticity in humans, and investigators have found that it shows a reliable abnormality in high-functioning adult individuals with ASD.
Each subject's participation in the study will consist of three visits: a screening visit and two identical study visits 1-3 weeks apart. Each visit will last for approximately 2 hours. During the first study visit the participants will provide informed consent. patients will then receive a thorough medical history and neurological and physical exam by a licensed physician with training in pediatric medicine. This will evaluate for underlying neurological disorders that would be exclusionary (e.g. motor impairments, epilepsy, medication contraindications etc.) All subjects will also complete a neuropsychological evaluation including IQ and ASD specific evaluations. If eligible to continue, the participant will then return within two weeks to undergo the first TMS evaluation. The TMS procedure will then be repeated 1-3 weeks later. The two identical TMS study visits aim to address reliability of the TMS-based measures: Investigators hypothesize that the TMS measures will be consistent across sessions within all study groups (ASD and controls, adults and children, low- and high-functioning individuals). Such test-retest reliability data are critical to explore the utility of the TMS measures as a potential marker for diagnosis and therapeutic efficacy of an intervention. Investigators thus anticipate that data from the proposed studies will address an important need for a rapid, noninvasive, reliable and safe endophenotype available to patients with ASD across ages and level of function.
- Conditions
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Intellectual Disability
- Keywords
- TMS, Autism Spectrum Disorders, Plasticity
- Medical subject headings
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Intellectual Disability
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Motor Evoked Potential
Motor Evoked Potential will be assessed using electromyogram (EMG). The computer data will be de-identified.
Measured: Immediately following TMS Motor Threshold determination.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2014
- Primary completion7 Aug 2017
- Study completion7 Aug 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Autism Spectrum DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Rhode Island Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation, Bradley Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lindsay Oberman, PhD, Principal investigator, Lifespan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02591446
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 413114
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 22 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 10 Aug 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Aug 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies in Autism Spectrum Disorders
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02591446
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 413114
- Conditions
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Intellectual Disability
- Keywords
- TMS, Autism Spectrum Disorders, Plasticity
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Rhode Island HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation, Bradley Hospital
- Study start
- Oct 2014
- Primary completion
- 7 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Aug 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is the most prevalent of the developmental disorders and their incidence is rising. However, the variability in the behavioral symptoms is large. In part for these reasons, the ASD clinical diagnosis is challenging and often is not made until 3-5 years of age. Thus, there remains an unmet need for a valid and reliable marker which would facilitate ASD diagnosis early in life, enable efficient study of ASD risk factors, and eventually serve as a useful marker to inform the development of effective therapies and assess treatment response in future clinical trials. The specific brain based marker that investigators are currently evaluating is brain plasticity (the changes that occur in your brain through experience). Investigators measure brain plasticity using noninvasive brain stimulation including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) combined with brain imaging, EEG, and behavioral outcome measures. Their work to date demonstrates the potential utility of these techniques in higher-functioning adolescents and adults with ASD, and pilot data support the feasibility and safety of applying the same measures to children and lower functioning individuals.
In this study, investigators will evaluate the validity of this marker in low- and high-functioning adults with ASD, in low- and high-functioning children with ASD, and assess the reliability of this marker.
Detailed description
The clinical, social and financial burden of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is staggering. They are the most prevalent of the developmental disorders and their incidence is rising. However, the ASD phenotype variability is large, and ASD symptoms can manifest over a range of ages and to different degrees. In part for these reasons, the ASD clinical diagnosis is challenging and often is not made until 3-5 years of age. Thus, there remains an unmet need for a valid and reliable endophenotype which would facilitate ASD diagnosis early in life, enable efficient study of ASD risk factors, and eventually serve as a useful biomarker to inform the development of effective therapies and assess treatment response in future clinical trials. The overarching goal of this proposal is to explore the utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures of brain plasticity as a novel neurophysiologic endophenotype in high- and low-functioning adults and children with ASD.
Investigators' work to date demonstrates the potential utility of these measures in higher-functioning adults with ASD, and pilot data support the feasibility and safety of applying the same measures to children and lower functioning individuals in whom the value of such an endophenotype would be particularly high. Investigators thus propose to apply single-pulse TMS to evaluate the modulation in corticospinal reactivity induced by a specific repetitive TMS protocol known as theta burst stimulation (TBS). The comparison of the motor responses induced by single-pulse TMS before and following TBS is a unique noninvasive measure of brain plasticity in humans, and investigators have found that it shows a reliable abnormality in high-functioning adult individuals with ASD.
Each subject's participation in the study will consist of three visits: a screening visit and two identical study visits 1-3 weeks apart. Each visit will last for approximately 2 hours. During the first study visit the participants will provide informed consent. patients will then receive a thorough medical history and neurological and physical exam by a licensed physician with training in pediatric medicine. This will evaluate for underlying neurological disorders that would be exclusionary (e.g. motor impairments, epilepsy, medication contraindications etc.) All subjects will also complete a neuropsychological evaluation including IQ and ASD specific evaluations. If eligible to continue, the participant will then return within two weeks to undergo the first TMS evaluation. The TMS procedure will then be repeated 1-3 weeks later. The two identical TMS study visits aim to address reliability of the TMS-based measures: Investigators hypothesize that the TMS measures will be consistent across sessions within all study groups (ASD and controls, adults and children, low- and high-functioning individuals). Such test-retest reliability data are critical to explore the utility of the TMS measures as a potential marker for diagnosis and therapeutic efficacy of an intervention. Investigators thus anticipate that data from the proposed studies will address an important need for a rapid, noninvasive, reliable and safe endophenotype available to patients with ASD across ages and level of function.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
- Study population
- We will study a total of 120 individuals with ASD. We will also evaluate a total of 120 controls. Ages 6 - 45
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- For ASD group: Clinical diagnosis of a disorder on the autism spectrum according to:
- For the Control group:
- For the group of individuals with Intellectual Disability: Mild to moderate intellectual disability with IQ < 70, but with no ASD.
- Age range: 6-45
- IQ: High functioning individuals will have an IQ>90; Low functioning individuals will have an IQ < 70 with mild-moderate intellectual disability.
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Intracranial pathology, cerebral palsy, history of severe head injury, or significant dysmorphology;
- History of fainting spells of unknown or undetermined etiology that might constitute seizures;
- History of seizures, diagnosis of epilepsy, or immediate (1st degree relative) family history epilepsy;
- Any progressive (e.g., neurodegenerative) neurological disorder;
- Chronic (particularly) uncontrolled medical conditions that may cause a medical emergency in case of a provoked seizure (cardiac malformation, cardiac dysrhythmia, asthma, etc.);
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Motor Evoked Potential
Time frame: Immediately following TMS Motor Threshold determination.
Motor Evoked Potential will be assessed using electromyogram (EMG). The computer data will be de-identified.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Aug 2017.
Related trials for Autism Spectrum Disorder
RecruitingPhase 1
Cannabidiol (CBD) in Adults With ASD
Autism Spectrum Disorder
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Xanomeline and Trospium Chloride for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders in Children and Adolescents
Schizophrenia, Autism-Related Irritability
Not yet recruiting
Sensory-integration Therapy Verses Augumented Reality-based Training in ASD
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Recruiting
Cumulative and Booster Effects of Multisession Prefrontal tDCS in ASD Adolescents
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Autistic Spectrum Disorder
Not yet recruiting
"Family Resilience And Mind-body Enhancement" (FRAME): A Randomised Controlled Trial
Autism
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lindsay Oberman, PhD principal investigator
Lifespan
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disability, run by Rhode Island Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Motor Evoked Potential (time frame: Immediately following TMS Motor Threshold determination.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Aug 2017.