AzTrials
AzTrials

GlaucomaNCT02594280

Benchmarking Management of Glaucoma Using the Diopsys VEP/PERG Protocols.

An observational study of Glaucoma, run by Diopsys, Inc..

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Establish electrophysiological benchmarks, using the Diopsys Visual Evoked Potential/ Pattern ERG (VEP/PERG) protocols of populations with Glaucoma following: 1) Baseline VEP/ERG prior to treatment; and 2) VEP/PERG after treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Glaucoma
How many people
60 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
15 Feb 2018to 1 May 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population is a group of glaucoma patients that are scheduled for 1) Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty or 2) Trabecular stent bypass microsurgery as a treatment.

Who may be able to join

  • Patient will have repeatable abnormal SAP results (pattern standard deviation with p ≤5% and/or Glaucoma Hemifield Test outside normal limits)
  • Glaucomatous optic disc appearance (those with cup to disc area ratio, rim thinning or RNFL defects indicative of glaucoma)
  • Repeatable intraocular pressure ≥23 mmHg, in at least one eye.
  • The last SAP test of all participants will be classified following the Glaucoma Staying System (GSS).

Who cannot join

  • A spherical refraction outside + 5.0 D and cylinder correction outside + 3.0 D.
  • Intraocular surgery in the study eye (except non-complicated cataract or refractive surgery performed less than 1 year before enrollment).
  • Any prior vitrectomy
  • Any prior macular or pan retinal photocoagulation laser
  • History of neurologic condition known to affect visual function.
  • Inability to obtain a reliable PERG/VEP test.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Kristy Truman contact

412-383-8778

trumank@upmc.edu

Melessa Salay, BS contact

412-383-9884

salaym@upmc.edu

About this study

Official title: Observational/Prospective Study for Benchmarking the Management of Glaucoma With Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) or Trabecular Stent Bypass Microsurgery, Using the Diopsys Visual Evoked Potential/Pattern ERG Protocols

Establish electrophysiological benchmarks, using the Diopsys Visual Evoked Potential/ Pattern ERG (VEP/PERG) protocols of populations with Glaucoma following: 1) Baseline VEP/ERG prior to treatment; and 2) VEP/PERG after treatment.

Read the detailed description

The VEP and PERG have been proven and accepted as a viable clinical tool in the assessment of diseases of the retina ganglion cells. The Diopsys® Neuro Optic Vision Assessment Vision (NOVA) Testing System generates a battery of retinal responses evoked by viewing horizontal/checkerboard grating patterns with optimized contrast levels and visual field sizes.

Electrophysiological tests evaluate the function of the different structures constituting the visual nervous pathways (retina, optic nerve, optic tract, and chiasm, radiation and cerebral cortex). Among the various electrophysiological examinations, two very important tests are Electroretinograms (ERGs), which study the various retinal components, and Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs) which study the visual pathway. These tests provide objective information on the function of the visual system even in those cases in which opacities of dioptric means (cataract, corneal leukoma) do not allow the direct observation of the retina and optic nerve, and may provide functional information in advance of structural changes.

Maculopathy and neuropathies are included in the long list of diseases of the visual pathway that permanently impair visual function. As there are considerable evidences related to the nature and evaluation of maculopathy and glaucomatous neuropathy, objective and reliable techniques are needed for visual function evaluation. By using PERG recordings, doctors are able to differentiate between normal subjects and subjects with ocular hypertension notwithstanding a normal optic disc and VF. PERG can provide important diagnostic information regarding the functional integrity of the macula and ganglion cells.

Based on a longitudinal study from Bascom Palmer Eye, abnormal retina function was recorded by PERG eight years before structural damage to the RNFL was detected. The study suggests that for glaucoma suspects it takes two years for a 10% change in PERG amplitude while it takes ten years for 10% change in RNFL.

The Diopsys® NOVA-pERG is a retinal biopotential that is evoked when a temporally phase-reversed horizontal/checkerboard grating pattern of constant total luminance is viewed. The contrast and viewing angle of the stimulus is optimized to elicit detection of dysfunction of the macula or the retinal ganglion cells selectively. The two NOVA-PERG reporting protocols are Contrast Sensitivity (CS) and Concentric Stimulus Fields (CSF). CS is optimized to detect dysfunctions of the retina that are sensitive to discrimination between different contrast levels while the CSF is optimized to localized pathologies in specific regions of the retina such as central vision and macula. Currently both protocols utilize steady-state technology.

The advantage of the Diopsys ERG as compared to traditional PERG is that it is non-invasive electrodes are attached to the eyelid and not the conjunctiva, and takes ten minutes to perform instead of 45. Patients do not been to be dark-adapted.

VEPs will be generated using a commercially available Diopsys NOVA System utilizing a fixed protocol. The stimulus will be presented on a 17-inch LCD monitor, running at 75 frames/s. Commercially available skin preparation and EEG paste will be used for recording of the SD-tVEP. Synchronized single-channel VEPs will be recorded, generating a time series of 1024 data points per analysis window. The room luminance will be maintained at scotopic conditions (<0.3 NITS). Preadaptation will be unnecessary for the SD-tVEP recordings. Multiple tests are run to comprise one SD-tVEP protocol. One complete NOVA-VEP (FP) presents a stimulus for a maximum of 1 minute and 46 seconds.

In all cases, the display will be viewed through natural pupils (undilated) with optimal refractive correction in place. The viewing distance will be set to 1 m, yielding a total display viewing angle of 15.5 degrees. The square black/white checkerboard pattern reversal stimulus has a height and width of 27 cm with a red circular ring used as a fixation target. The diameter of the target is approximately 1.5 cm with a ring thickness of 1.5 mm. The target ring will be centered on the stimulus. The check size will be 29.0 minutes of arc. Two pattern contrasts will be used in the study, based on earlier studies that suggested that differential contrast stimulation could affect the NOVA-VEP (FP) waveforms. The first pattern will have a Michelson contrast of 15%. The second pattern will have a Michelson contrast of 85%. These two patterns are referred to as LC (Low contrast) and HC (High contrast) respectively.

During a recording session, the contrast polarity of each stimulus check will be temporally modulated at a reversal frequency of 1 Hz (2 pattern reversals equates to 1 reversal cycle); therefore, each reversal occurs at 2 Hz or twice per second. This stimulus is termed a pattern reversal stimulus and has a duty cycle of 50%. The 15% and 85% contrast stimuli will be presented for each eye (the fellow eye was covered) for 15 seconds. The right eye will be the first one to be tested for all patients.

In preparation for recording, the skin at each electrode site will be scrubbed with Nuprep using a cotton gauze pad. Electrodes will be fixed in position with Ten20 conductive paste and secured with a small gauze pad with conductive paste applied. Electrode impedance will be maintained below 10 kohm and typically kept below 5 kohm.

The Pattern Electroretinogram (PERG) will be recorded using a commercially available system Diopsys® NOVA (Diopsys, Inc. Pine Brook, New Jersey). The testing protocol will include the Concentric Stimulus Field (CSF).

Subjects will be fitted with the appropriate correction for a viewing distance of 24 inches and will be instructed to fixate on a target at the center of stimulus monitor. The test will be performed in a dark room to standardized environment luminance, free of visual and audible distractions. The subject will be comfortable seated facing the stimulus monitor. The patient's seated height will be adjusted so the eye stays in a horizontal plane with the center of the monitor. The test will be performed without pupil dilation and subjects will be allowed to blink freely.

The PERG will be recorded from the study eye by means of hypoallergenic skin sensors Silver/Silver Chloride ink (Diopsys® proprietary Skin Sensor) on the lower eyelids. The reference sensor will be located in the contralateral eyelid and ground sensor in the central forehead area (Fz). The skin will be prepared by cleaning with eyelid cleanser (OCuSOFT®) to ensure good and stable electrical conductivity, keeping the impedances bellow 5 kohm.

The stimulus will be presented on a gamma corrected Acer V173BM 17-inch LCD monitor, having a refresh rate of 75 frames / second. The CSF pattern stimulus will consist of black/white horizontal gratings (24° and 16° circular field, 98% contrast and 102.28 candelas/m2 mean luminance), reversing at 15 reversals/second) with a duration of 25 seconds. A red spinning ring will be used as a fixation target with a diameter of 1 cm and 1 mm of thickness. This target ring will be at the corner of four checks, centered on the stimulus field.

A test will be categorized as non-reliable if Phase Variance is greater than 0.4 and/or if the Magnitude Variance to Magnitude Ratio (VMR) is greater than 2.9 and/or if more than 4 artifacts are detected. The FERG test results will be saved in an SQL database and presented in a report form to be used for analysis.

Conditions
Glaucoma
Medical subject headings
Glaucoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02594280
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT)SLTMonitor glaucoma patients that are scheduled to be treated with Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) with VEP/PERG. The treatment is not dependent on the study.
Trabecular stent bypass microsurgeryMonitor glaucoma patients that are scheduled to be treated with trabecular stent bypass microsurgery with VEP/PERG.The treatment is not dependent on the study.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. VEP Amplitude at 15% Contrast

    Record the VEP Amplitude at 15% contrast stimulus.

    Measured: Within 1 month prior to treatment

  2. VEP Amplitude at 15% Contrast

    Record the VEP Amplitude at 15% contrast stimulus.

    Measured: 3 months post treatment

  3. VEP Amplitude at 15% Contrast

    Record the VEP Amplitude at 15% contrast stimulus

    Measured: 6 months post treatment

  4. VEP Latency at 15% Contrast

    Record the VEP Latency at 15% contrast stimulus.

    Measured: Within 1 month prior to treatment

  5. VEP Latency at 15% Contrast

    Record the VEP Latency at 15% contrast stimulus

    Measured: 3 months post treatment

  6. VEP Latency at 15% Contrast

    Record the VEP Latency at 15% contrast stimulus

    Measured: 6 months post treatment

  7. VEP Amplitude at 85% Contrast

    Record the VEP Amplitude at 85% contrast stimulus.

    Measured: Within 1 month prior to treatment

  8. VEP Amplitude at 85% Contrast

    Record the VEP Amplitude at 85% contrast stimulus.

    Measured: 3 months post treatment

  9. VEP Amplitude at 85% Contrast

    Record the VEP Amplitude at 85% contrast stimulus.

    Measured: 6 months post treatment

  10. VEP Latency at 85% Contrast

    Record the VEP Latency at 85% contrast stimulus

    Measured: Within 1 month prior to treatment

  11. VEP Latency at 85% Contrast

    Record the VEP Latency at 85% contrast stimulus

    Measured: 3 months post treatment

  12. VEP Latency at 85% Contrast

    Record the VEP Latency at 85% contrast stimulus

    Measured: 6 months post treatment

  13. PERG Magnitude at 16 degree stimulus

    Record the PERG Magnitude at 16 degree stimulus

    Measured: Within 1 month prior to treatment

  14. PERG Magnitude at 16 degree stimulus

    Record the PERG Magnitude at 16 degree stimulus

    Measured: 3 months post treatment

  15. PERG Magnitude at 16 degree stimulus

    Record the PERG Magnitude at 16 degree stimulus

    Measured: 6 months post treatment

  16. PERG MagnitudeD at 16 degree stimulus

    Record the PERG MagnitudeD at 16 degree stimulus

    Measured: Within 1 month prior to treatment

  17. PERG MagnitudeD at 16 degree stimulus

    Record the PERG MagnitudeD at 16 degree stimulus

    Measured: 3 months post treatment

  18. PERG MagnitudeD at 16 degree stimulus

    Record the PERG MagnitudeD at 16 degree stimulus

    Measured: 6 months post treatment

  19. PERG Magnitude at 24 degree stimulus

    Record the PERG Magnitude at 24 degree stimulus

    Measured: Within 1 month prior to treatment

  20. PERG Magnitude at 24 degree stimulus

    Record the PERG Magnitude at 24 degree stimulus

    Measured: 3 months post treatment

  21. PERG Magnitude at 24 degree stimulus

    Record the PERG Magnitude at 24 degree stimulus

    Measured: 6 months post treatment

  22. PERG MagnitudeD at 24 degree stimulus

    Record the PERG MagnitudeD at 24 degree stimulus

    Measured: Within 1 month prior to treatment

  23. PERG MagnitudeD at 24 degree stimulus

    Record the PERG MagnitudeD at 24 degree stimulus

    Measured: 3 months post treatment

  24. PERG MagnitudeD at 24 degree stimulus

    Record the PERG MagnitudeD at 24 degree stimulus

    Measured: 6 months post treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Nov 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start15 Feb 2018 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion15 Dec 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 May 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02594280
Sponsor's protocol ID
2015-UPMC-01
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
30 Oct 2015
Last updated
25 Jan 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Bach M, Brigell MG, Hawlina M, Holder GE, Johnson MA, McCulloch DL, Meigen T, Viswanathan S. ISCEV standard for clinical pattern electroretinography (PERG): 2012 update. Doc Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;126(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s10633-012-9353-y. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

    PubMed 23073702
  • Banitt MR, Ventura LM, Feuer WJ, Savatovsky E, Luna G, Shif O, Bosse B, Porciatti V. Progressive loss of retinal ganglion cell function precedes structural loss by several years in glaucoma suspects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Mar 28;54(3):2346-52. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-11026.

    PubMed 23412088
  • Bode SF, Jehle T, Bach M. Pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma suspects: new findings from a longitudinal study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jun 16;52(7):4300-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6381.

    PubMed 21372021
  • Parisi V, Miglior S, Manni G, Centofanti M, Bucci MG. Clinical ability of pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in detecting visual dysfunction in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2006 Feb;113(2):216-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.10.044. Epub 2006 Jan 10.

    PubMed 16406535
  • Dodt E. The electrical response of the human eye to patterned stimuli: clinical observations. Doc Ophthalmol. 1987 Mar;65(3):271-86. doi: 10.1007/BF00149934.

    PubMed 3678000
  • Carr MD RE. The Pattern Electroretinogram (PERG). Paper presented at: NANOS, 1988.

  • Ventura LM, Porciatti V. Pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006 Apr;17(2):196-202. doi: 10.1097/01.icu.0000193082.44938.3c.

    PubMed 16552256
  • Bach M, Unsoeld AS, Philippin H, Staubach F, Maier P, Walter HS, Bomer TG, Funk J. Pattern ERG as an early glaucoma indicator in ocular hypertension: a long-term, prospective study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Nov;47(11):4881-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0875.

    PubMed 17065502
  • Kono Y, Jonas JB, Zangwill L, Berry CC, Weinreb RN. Agreement of measurement of parapapillary atrophy with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and planimetry of photographs. J Glaucoma. 1999 Apr;8(2):105-10.

    PubMed 10209726
  • Holder GE. Pattern electroretinography (PERG) and an integrated approach to visual pathway diagnosis. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2001 Jul;20(4):531-61. doi: 10.1016/s1350-9462(00)00030-6.

    PubMed 11390258

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Glaucoma, run by Diopsys, Inc..

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Kristy Truman (412-383-8778, trumank@upmc.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

VEP Amplitude at 15% Contrast (time frame: Within 1 month prior to treatment). The study lists 24 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02594280, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jan 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in