GlaucomaNCT02594280
Benchmarking Management of Glaucoma Using the Diopsys VEP/PERG Protocols.
An observational study of Glaucoma, run by Diopsys, Inc..
Trial summary
Establish electrophysiological benchmarks, using the Diopsys Visual Evoked Potential/ Pattern ERG (VEP/PERG) protocols of populations with Glaucoma following: 1) Baseline VEP/ERG prior to treatment; and 2) VEP/PERG after treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Glaucoma
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 15 Feb 2018to 1 May 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study population is a group of glaucoma patients that are scheduled for 1) Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty or 2) Trabecular stent bypass microsurgery as a treatment.
Who may be able to join
- Patient will have repeatable abnormal SAP results (pattern standard deviation with p ≤5% and/or Glaucoma Hemifield Test outside normal limits)
- Glaucomatous optic disc appearance (those with cup to disc area ratio, rim thinning or RNFL defects indicative of glaucoma)
- Repeatable intraocular pressure ≥23 mmHg, in at least one eye.
- The last SAP test of all participants will be classified following the Glaucoma Staying System (GSS).
Who cannot join
- A spherical refraction outside + 5.0 D and cylinder correction outside + 3.0 D.
- Intraocular surgery in the study eye (except non-complicated cataract or refractive surgery performed less than 1 year before enrollment).
- Any prior vitrectomy
- Any prior macular or pan retinal photocoagulation laser
- History of neurologic condition known to affect visual function.
- Inability to obtain a reliable PERG/VEP test.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Observational/Prospective Study for Benchmarking the Management of Glaucoma With Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) or Trabecular Stent Bypass Microsurgery, Using the Diopsys Visual Evoked Potential/Pattern ERG Protocols
Establish electrophysiological benchmarks, using the Diopsys Visual Evoked Potential/ Pattern ERG (VEP/PERG) protocols of populations with Glaucoma following: 1) Baseline VEP/ERG prior to treatment; and 2) VEP/PERG after treatment.
Read the detailed description
The VEP and PERG have been proven and accepted as a viable clinical tool in the assessment of diseases of the retina ganglion cells. The Diopsys® Neuro Optic Vision Assessment Vision (NOVA) Testing System generates a battery of retinal responses evoked by viewing horizontal/checkerboard grating patterns with optimized contrast levels and visual field sizes.
Electrophysiological tests evaluate the function of the different structures constituting the visual nervous pathways (retina, optic nerve, optic tract, and chiasm, radiation and cerebral cortex). Among the various electrophysiological examinations, two very important tests are Electroretinograms (ERGs), which study the various retinal components, and Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs) which study the visual pathway. These tests provide objective information on the function of the visual system even in those cases in which opacities of dioptric means (cataract, corneal leukoma) do not allow the direct observation of the retina and optic nerve, and may provide functional information in advance of structural changes.
Maculopathy and neuropathies are included in the long list of diseases of the visual pathway that permanently impair visual function. As there are considerable evidences related to the nature and evaluation of maculopathy and glaucomatous neuropathy, objective and reliable techniques are needed for visual function evaluation. By using PERG recordings, doctors are able to differentiate between normal subjects and subjects with ocular hypertension notwithstanding a normal optic disc and VF. PERG can provide important diagnostic information regarding the functional integrity of the macula and ganglion cells.
Based on a longitudinal study from Bascom Palmer Eye, abnormal retina function was recorded by PERG eight years before structural damage to the RNFL was detected. The study suggests that for glaucoma suspects it takes two years for a 10% change in PERG amplitude while it takes ten years for 10% change in RNFL.
The Diopsys® NOVA-pERG is a retinal biopotential that is evoked when a temporally phase-reversed horizontal/checkerboard grating pattern of constant total luminance is viewed. The contrast and viewing angle of the stimulus is optimized to elicit detection of dysfunction of the macula or the retinal ganglion cells selectively. The two NOVA-PERG reporting protocols are Contrast Sensitivity (CS) and Concentric Stimulus Fields (CSF). CS is optimized to detect dysfunctions of the retina that are sensitive to discrimination between different contrast levels while the CSF is optimized to localized pathologies in specific regions of the retina such as central vision and macula. Currently both protocols utilize steady-state technology.
The advantage of the Diopsys ERG as compared to traditional PERG is that it is non-invasive electrodes are attached to the eyelid and not the conjunctiva, and takes ten minutes to perform instead of 45. Patients do not been to be dark-adapted.
VEPs will be generated using a commercially available Diopsys NOVA System utilizing a fixed protocol. The stimulus will be presented on a 17-inch LCD monitor, running at 75 frames/s. Commercially available skin preparation and EEG paste will be used for recording of the SD-tVEP. Synchronized single-channel VEPs will be recorded, generating a time series of 1024 data points per analysis window. The room luminance will be maintained at scotopic conditions (<0.3 NITS). Preadaptation will be unnecessary for the SD-tVEP recordings. Multiple tests are run to comprise one SD-tVEP protocol. One complete NOVA-VEP (FP) presents a stimulus for a maximum of 1 minute and 46 seconds.
In all cases, the display will be viewed through natural pupils (undilated) with optimal refractive correction in place. The viewing distance will be set to 1 m, yielding a total display viewing angle of 15.5 degrees. The square black/white checkerboard pattern reversal stimulus has a height and width of 27 cm with a red circular ring used as a fixation target. The diameter of the target is approximately 1.5 cm with a ring thickness of 1.5 mm. The target ring will be centered on the stimulus. The check size will be 29.0 minutes of arc. Two pattern contrasts will be used in the study, based on earlier studies that suggested that differential contrast stimulation could affect the NOVA-VEP (FP) waveforms. The first pattern will have a Michelson contrast of 15%. The second pattern will have a Michelson contrast of 85%. These two patterns are referred to as LC (Low contrast) and HC (High contrast) respectively.
During a recording session, the contrast polarity of each stimulus check will be temporally modulated at a reversal frequency of 1 Hz (2 pattern reversals equates to 1 reversal cycle); therefore, each reversal occurs at 2 Hz or twice per second. This stimulus is termed a pattern reversal stimulus and has a duty cycle of 50%. The 15% and 85% contrast stimuli will be presented for each eye (the fellow eye was covered) for 15 seconds. The right eye will be the first one to be tested for all patients.
In preparation for recording, the skin at each electrode site will be scrubbed with Nuprep using a cotton gauze pad. Electrodes will be fixed in position with Ten20 conductive paste and secured with a small gauze pad with conductive paste applied. Electrode impedance will be maintained below 10 kohm and typically kept below 5 kohm.
The Pattern Electroretinogram (PERG) will be recorded using a commercially available system Diopsys® NOVA (Diopsys, Inc. Pine Brook, New Jersey). The testing protocol will include the Concentric Stimulus Field (CSF).
Subjects will be fitted with the appropriate correction for a viewing distance of 24 inches and will be instructed to fixate on a target at the center of stimulus monitor. The test will be performed in a dark room to standardized environment luminance, free of visual and audible distractions. The subject will be comfortable seated facing the stimulus monitor. The patient's seated height will be adjusted so the eye stays in a horizontal plane with the center of the monitor. The test will be performed without pupil dilation and subjects will be allowed to blink freely.
The PERG will be recorded from the study eye by means of hypoallergenic skin sensors Silver/Silver Chloride ink (Diopsys® proprietary Skin Sensor) on the lower eyelids. The reference sensor will be located in the contralateral eyelid and ground sensor in the central forehead area (Fz). The skin will be prepared by cleaning with eyelid cleanser (OCuSOFT®) to ensure good and stable electrical conductivity, keeping the impedances bellow 5 kohm.
The stimulus will be presented on a gamma corrected Acer V173BM 17-inch LCD monitor, having a refresh rate of 75 frames / second. The CSF pattern stimulus will consist of black/white horizontal gratings (24° and 16° circular field, 98% contrast and 102.28 candelas/m2 mean luminance), reversing at 15 reversals/second) with a duration of 25 seconds. A red spinning ring will be used as a fixation target with a diameter of 1 cm and 1 mm of thickness. This target ring will be at the corner of four checks, centered on the stimulus field.
A test will be categorized as non-reliable if Phase Variance is greater than 0.4 and/or if the Magnitude Variance to Magnitude Ratio (VMR) is greater than 2.9 and/or if more than 4 artifacts are detected. The FERG test results will be saved in an SQL database and presented in a report form to be used for analysis.
- Conditions
- Glaucoma
- Medical subject headings
- Glaucoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT)SLT | Monitor glaucoma patients that are scheduled to be treated with Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) with VEP/PERG. The treatment is not dependent on the study. | |
| Trabecular stent bypass microsurgery | Monitor glaucoma patients that are scheduled to be treated with trabecular stent bypass microsurgery with VEP/PERG.The treatment is not dependent on the study. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
VEP Amplitude at 15% Contrast
Record the VEP Amplitude at 15% contrast stimulus.
Measured: Within 1 month prior to treatment
VEP Amplitude at 15% Contrast
Record the VEP Amplitude at 15% contrast stimulus.
Measured: 3 months post treatment
VEP Amplitude at 15% Contrast
Record the VEP Amplitude at 15% contrast stimulus
Measured: 6 months post treatment
VEP Latency at 15% Contrast
Record the VEP Latency at 15% contrast stimulus.
Measured: Within 1 month prior to treatment
VEP Latency at 15% Contrast
Record the VEP Latency at 15% contrast stimulus
Measured: 3 months post treatment
VEP Latency at 15% Contrast
Record the VEP Latency at 15% contrast stimulus
Measured: 6 months post treatment
VEP Amplitude at 85% Contrast
Record the VEP Amplitude at 85% contrast stimulus.
Measured: Within 1 month prior to treatment
VEP Amplitude at 85% Contrast
Record the VEP Amplitude at 85% contrast stimulus.
Measured: 3 months post treatment
VEP Amplitude at 85% Contrast
Record the VEP Amplitude at 85% contrast stimulus.
Measured: 6 months post treatment
VEP Latency at 85% Contrast
Record the VEP Latency at 85% contrast stimulus
Measured: Within 1 month prior to treatment
VEP Latency at 85% Contrast
Record the VEP Latency at 85% contrast stimulus
Measured: 3 months post treatment
VEP Latency at 85% Contrast
Record the VEP Latency at 85% contrast stimulus
Measured: 6 months post treatment
PERG Magnitude at 16 degree stimulus
Record the PERG Magnitude at 16 degree stimulus
Measured: Within 1 month prior to treatment
PERG Magnitude at 16 degree stimulus
Record the PERG Magnitude at 16 degree stimulus
Measured: 3 months post treatment
PERG Magnitude at 16 degree stimulus
Record the PERG Magnitude at 16 degree stimulus
Measured: 6 months post treatment
PERG MagnitudeD at 16 degree stimulus
Record the PERG MagnitudeD at 16 degree stimulus
Measured: Within 1 month prior to treatment
PERG MagnitudeD at 16 degree stimulus
Record the PERG MagnitudeD at 16 degree stimulus
Measured: 3 months post treatment
PERG MagnitudeD at 16 degree stimulus
Record the PERG MagnitudeD at 16 degree stimulus
Measured: 6 months post treatment
PERG Magnitude at 24 degree stimulus
Record the PERG Magnitude at 24 degree stimulus
Measured: Within 1 month prior to treatment
PERG Magnitude at 24 degree stimulus
Record the PERG Magnitude at 24 degree stimulus
Measured: 3 months post treatment
PERG Magnitude at 24 degree stimulus
Record the PERG Magnitude at 24 degree stimulus
Measured: 6 months post treatment
PERG MagnitudeD at 24 degree stimulus
Record the PERG MagnitudeD at 24 degree stimulus
Measured: Within 1 month prior to treatment
PERG MagnitudeD at 24 degree stimulus
Record the PERG MagnitudeD at 24 degree stimulus
Measured: 3 months post treatment
PERG MagnitudeD at 24 degree stimulus
Record the PERG MagnitudeD at 24 degree stimulus
Measured: 6 months post treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Nov 2015 (estimated)
- Study start15 Feb 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completion15 Dec 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion1 May 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for GlaucomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Diopsys, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- University of Pittsburgh
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Wollstein Gadi, MD, Principal investigator, University of Pittsburgh
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02594280
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2015-UPMC-01
- Status last verified
- Jan 2018
- First submitted
- 30 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 25 Jan 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Bach M, Brigell MG, Hawlina M, Holder GE, Johnson MA, McCulloch DL, Meigen T, Viswanathan S. ISCEV standard for clinical pattern electroretinography (PERG): 2012 update. Doc Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;126(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s10633-012-9353-y. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
PubMed 23073702Banitt MR, Ventura LM, Feuer WJ, Savatovsky E, Luna G, Shif O, Bosse B, Porciatti V. Progressive loss of retinal ganglion cell function precedes structural loss by several years in glaucoma suspects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Mar 28;54(3):2346-52. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-11026.
PubMed 23412088Bode SF, Jehle T, Bach M. Pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma suspects: new findings from a longitudinal study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jun 16;52(7):4300-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6381.
PubMed 21372021Parisi V, Miglior S, Manni G, Centofanti M, Bucci MG. Clinical ability of pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in detecting visual dysfunction in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2006 Feb;113(2):216-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.10.044. Epub 2006 Jan 10.
PubMed 16406535Dodt E. The electrical response of the human eye to patterned stimuli: clinical observations. Doc Ophthalmol. 1987 Mar;65(3):271-86. doi: 10.1007/BF00149934.
PubMed 3678000Carr MD RE. The Pattern Electroretinogram (PERG). Paper presented at: NANOS, 1988.
Ventura LM, Porciatti V. Pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006 Apr;17(2):196-202. doi: 10.1097/01.icu.0000193082.44938.3c.
PubMed 16552256Bach M, Unsoeld AS, Philippin H, Staubach F, Maier P, Walter HS, Bomer TG, Funk J. Pattern ERG as an early glaucoma indicator in ocular hypertension: a long-term, prospective study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Nov;47(11):4881-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0875.
PubMed 17065502Kono Y, Jonas JB, Zangwill L, Berry CC, Weinreb RN. Agreement of measurement of parapapillary atrophy with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and planimetry of photographs. J Glaucoma. 1999 Apr;8(2):105-10.
PubMed 10209726Holder GE. Pattern electroretinography (PERG) and an integrated approach to visual pathway diagnosis. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2001 Jul;20(4):531-61. doi: 10.1016/s1350-9462(00)00030-6.
PubMed 11390258
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jan 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Observational/Prospective Study for Benchmarking the Management of Glaucoma With Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) or Trabecular Stent Bypass Microsurgery, Using the Diopsys Visual Evoked Potential/Pattern ERG Protocols
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02594280
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2015-UPMC-01
- Conditions
- Glaucoma
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Diopsys, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- University of Pittsburgh
- Study start
- 15 Feb 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 15 Dec 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Nov 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Establish electrophysiological benchmarks, using the Diopsys Visual Evoked Potential/ Pattern ERG (VEP/PERG) protocols of populations with Glaucoma following: 1) Baseline VEP/ERG prior to treatment; and 2) VEP/PERG after treatment.
Detailed description
The VEP and PERG have been proven and accepted as a viable clinical tool in the assessment of diseases of the retina ganglion cells. The Diopsys® Neuro Optic Vision Assessment Vision (NOVA) Testing System generates a battery of retinal responses evoked by viewing horizontal/checkerboard grating patterns with optimized contrast levels and visual field sizes.
Electrophysiological tests evaluate the function of the different structures constituting the visual nervous pathways (retina, optic nerve, optic tract, and chiasm, radiation and cerebral cortex). Among the various electrophysiological examinations, two very important tests are Electroretinograms (ERGs), which study the various retinal components, and Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs) which study the visual pathway. These tests provide objective information on the function of the visual system even in those cases in which opacities of dioptric means (cataract, corneal leukoma) do not allow the direct observation of the retina and optic nerve, and may provide functional information in advance of structural changes.
Maculopathy and neuropathies are included in the long list of diseases of the visual pathway that permanently impair visual function. As there are considerable evidences related to the nature and evaluation of maculopathy and glaucomatous neuropathy, objective and reliable techniques are needed for visual function evaluation. By using PERG recordings, doctors are able to differentiate between normal subjects and subjects with ocular hypertension notwithstanding a normal optic disc and VF. PERG can provide important diagnostic information regarding the functional integrity of the macula and ganglion cells.
Based on a longitudinal study from Bascom Palmer Eye, abnormal retina function was recorded by PERG eight years before structural damage to the RNFL was detected. The study suggests that for glaucoma suspects it takes two years for a 10% change in PERG amplitude while it takes ten years for 10% change in RNFL.
The Diopsys® NOVA-pERG is a retinal biopotential that is evoked when a temporally phase-reversed horizontal/checkerboard grating pattern of constant total luminance is viewed. The contrast and viewing angle of the stimulus is optimized to elicit detection of dysfunction of the macula or the retinal ganglion cells selectively. The two NOVA-PERG reporting protocols are Contrast Sensitivity (CS) and Concentric Stimulus Fields (CSF). CS is optimized to detect dysfunctions of the retina that are sensitive to discrimination between different contrast levels while the CSF is optimized to localized pathologies in specific regions of the retina such as central vision and macula. Currently both protocols utilize steady-state technology.
The advantage of the Diopsys ERG as compared to traditional PERG is that it is non-invasive electrodes are attached to the eyelid and not the conjunctiva, and takes ten minutes to perform instead of 45. Patients do not been to be dark-adapted.
VEPs will be generated using a commercially available Diopsys NOVA System utilizing a fixed protocol. The stimulus will be presented on a 17-inch LCD monitor, running at 75 frames/s. Commercially available skin preparation and EEG paste will be used for recording of the SD-tVEP. Synchronized single-channel VEPs will be recorded, generating a time series of 1024 data points per analysis window. The room luminance will be maintained at scotopic conditions (<0.3 NITS). Preadaptation will be unnecessary for the SD-tVEP recordings. Multiple tests are run to comprise one SD-tVEP protocol. One complete NOVA-VEP (FP) presents a stimulus for a maximum of 1 minute and 46 seconds.
In all cases, the display will be viewed through natural pupils (undilated) with optimal refractive correction in place. The viewing distance will be set to 1 m, yielding a total display viewing angle of 15.5 degrees. The square black/white checkerboard pattern reversal stimulus has a height and width of 27 cm with a red circular ring used as a fixation target. The diameter of the target is approximately 1.5 cm with a ring thickness of 1.5 mm. The target ring will be centered on the stimulus. The check size will be 29.0 minutes of arc. Two pattern contrasts will be used in the study, based on earlier studies that suggested that differential contrast stimulation could affect the NOVA-VEP (FP) waveforms. The first pattern will have a Michelson contrast of 15%. The second pattern will have a Michelson contrast of 85%. These two patterns are referred to as LC (Low contrast) and HC (High contrast) respectively.
During a recording session, the contrast polarity of each stimulus check will be temporally modulated at a reversal frequency of 1 Hz (2 pattern reversals equates to 1 reversal cycle); therefore, each reversal occurs at 2 Hz or twice per second. This stimulus is termed a pattern reversal stimulus and has a duty cycle of 50%. The 15% and 85% contrast stimuli will be presented for each eye (the fellow eye was covered) for 15 seconds. The right eye will be the first one to be tested for all patients.
In preparation for recording, the skin at each electrode site will be scrubbed with Nuprep using a cotton gauze pad. Electrodes will be fixed in position with Ten20 conductive paste and secured with a small gauze pad with conductive paste applied. Electrode impedance will be maintained below 10 kohm and typically kept below 5 kohm.
The Pattern Electroretinogram (PERG) will be recorded using a commercially available system Diopsys® NOVA (Diopsys, Inc. Pine Brook, New Jersey). The testing protocol will include the Concentric Stimulus Field (CSF).
Subjects will be fitted with the appropriate correction for a viewing distance of 24 inches and will be instructed to fixate on a target at the center of stimulus monitor. The test will be performed in a dark room to standardized environment luminance, free of visual and audible distractions. The subject will be comfortable seated facing the stimulus monitor. The patient's seated height will be adjusted so the eye stays in a horizontal plane with the center of the monitor. The test will be performed without pupil dilation and subjects will be allowed to blink freely.
The PERG will be recorded from the study eye by means of hypoallergenic skin sensors Silver/Silver Chloride ink (Diopsys® proprietary Skin Sensor) on the lower eyelids. The reference sensor will be located in the contralateral eyelid and ground sensor in the central forehead area (Fz). The skin will be prepared by cleaning with eyelid cleanser (OCuSOFT®) to ensure good and stable electrical conductivity, keeping the impedances bellow 5 kohm.
The stimulus will be presented on a gamma corrected Acer V173BM 17-inch LCD monitor, having a refresh rate of 75 frames / second. The CSF pattern stimulus will consist of black/white horizontal gratings (24° and 16° circular field, 98% contrast and 102.28 candelas/m2 mean luminance), reversing at 15 reversals/second) with a duration of 25 seconds. A red spinning ring will be used as a fixation target with a diameter of 1 cm and 1 mm of thickness. This target ring will be at the corner of four checks, centered on the stimulus field.
A test will be categorized as non-reliable if Phase Variance is greater than 0.4 and/or if the Magnitude Variance to Magnitude Ratio (VMR) is greater than 2.9 and/or if more than 4 artifacts are detected. The FERG test results will be saved in an SQL database and presented in a report form to be used for analysis.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT)SLT | – | –Monitor glaucoma patients that are scheduled to be treated with Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) with VEP/PERG. The treatment is not dependent on the study. |
| Trabecular stent bypass microsurgery | – | –Monitor glaucoma patients that are scheduled to be treated with trabecular stent bypass microsurgery with VEP/PERG.The treatment is not dependent on the study. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study population is a group of glaucoma patients that are scheduled for 1) Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty or 2) Trabecular stent bypass microsurgery as a treatment.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patient will have repeatable abnormal SAP results (pattern standard deviation with p ≤5% and/or Glaucoma Hemifield Test outside normal limits)
- Glaucomatous optic disc appearance (those with cup to disc area ratio, rim thinning or RNFL defects indicative of glaucoma)
- Repeatable intraocular pressure ≥23 mmHg, in at least one eye.
- The last SAP test of all participants will be classified following the Glaucoma Staying System (GSS).
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- A spherical refraction outside + 5.0 D and cylinder correction outside + 3.0 D.
- Intraocular surgery in the study eye (except non-complicated cataract or refractive surgery performed less than 1 year before enrollment).
- Any prior vitrectomy
- Any prior macular or pan retinal photocoagulation laser
- History of neurologic condition known to affect visual function.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
VEP Amplitude at 15% Contrast
Time frame: Within 1 month prior to treatment
Record the VEP Amplitude at 15% contrast stimulus.
VEP Amplitude at 15% Contrast
Time frame: 3 months post treatment
Record the VEP Amplitude at 15% contrast stimulus.
VEP Amplitude at 15% Contrast
Time frame: 6 months post treatment
Record the VEP Amplitude at 15% contrast stimulus
VEP Latency at 15% Contrast
Time frame: Within 1 month prior to treatment
Record the VEP Latency at 15% contrast stimulus.
VEP Latency at 15% Contrast
Time frame: 3 months post treatment
Record the VEP Latency at 15% contrast stimulus
VEP Latency at 15% Contrast
Time frame: 6 months post treatment
Record the VEP Latency at 15% contrast stimulus
VEP Amplitude at 85% Contrast
Time frame: Within 1 month prior to treatment
Record the VEP Amplitude at 85% contrast stimulus.
VEP Amplitude at 85% Contrast
Time frame: 3 months post treatment
Record the VEP Amplitude at 85% contrast stimulus.
VEP Amplitude at 85% Contrast
Time frame: 6 months post treatment
Record the VEP Amplitude at 85% contrast stimulus.
VEP Latency at 85% Contrast
Time frame: Within 1 month prior to treatment
Record the VEP Latency at 85% contrast stimulus
VEP Latency at 85% Contrast
Time frame: 3 months post treatment
Record the VEP Latency at 85% contrast stimulus
VEP Latency at 85% Contrast
Time frame: 6 months post treatment
Record the VEP Latency at 85% contrast stimulus
PERG Magnitude at 16 degree stimulus
Time frame: Within 1 month prior to treatment
Record the PERG Magnitude at 16 degree stimulus
PERG Magnitude at 16 degree stimulus
Time frame: 3 months post treatment
Record the PERG Magnitude at 16 degree stimulus
PERG Magnitude at 16 degree stimulus
Time frame: 6 months post treatment
Record the PERG Magnitude at 16 degree stimulus
PERG MagnitudeD at 16 degree stimulus
Time frame: Within 1 month prior to treatment
Record the PERG MagnitudeD at 16 degree stimulus
PERG MagnitudeD at 16 degree stimulus
Time frame: 3 months post treatment
Record the PERG MagnitudeD at 16 degree stimulus
PERG MagnitudeD at 16 degree stimulus
Time frame: 6 months post treatment
Record the PERG MagnitudeD at 16 degree stimulus
PERG Magnitude at 24 degree stimulus
Time frame: Within 1 month prior to treatment
Record the PERG Magnitude at 24 degree stimulus
PERG Magnitude at 24 degree stimulus
Time frame: 3 months post treatment
Record the PERG Magnitude at 24 degree stimulus
PERG Magnitude at 24 degree stimulus
Time frame: 6 months post treatment
Record the PERG Magnitude at 24 degree stimulus
PERG MagnitudeD at 24 degree stimulus
Time frame: Within 1 month prior to treatment
Record the PERG MagnitudeD at 24 degree stimulus
PERG MagnitudeD at 24 degree stimulus
Time frame: 3 months post treatment
Record the PERG MagnitudeD at 24 degree stimulus
PERG MagnitudeD at 24 degree stimulus
Time frame: 6 months post treatment
Record the PERG MagnitudeD at 24 degree stimulus
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jan 2018.
- Background: PubMed 23073702Bach M, Brigell MG, Hawlina M, Holder GE, Johnson MA, McCulloch DL, Meigen T, Viswanathan S. ISCEV standard for clinical pattern electroretinography (PERG): 2012 update. Doc Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;126(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s10633-012-9353-y. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
- Background: PubMed 23412088Banitt MR, Ventura LM, Feuer WJ, Savatovsky E, Luna G, Shif O, Bosse B, Porciatti V. Progressive loss of retinal ganglion cell function precedes structural loss by several years in glaucoma suspects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Mar 28;54(3):2346-52. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-11026.
- Background: PubMed 21372021Bode SF, Jehle T, Bach M. Pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma suspects: new findings from a longitudinal study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jun 16;52(7):4300-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6381.
- Background: PubMed 16406535Parisi V, Miglior S, Manni G, Centofanti M, Bucci MG. Clinical ability of pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in detecting visual dysfunction in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2006 Feb;113(2):216-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.10.044. Epub 2006 Jan 10.
- Background: PubMed 3678000Dodt E. The electrical response of the human eye to patterned stimuli: clinical observations. Doc Ophthalmol. 1987 Mar;65(3):271-86. doi: 10.1007/BF00149934.
- BackgroundCarr MD RE. The Pattern Electroretinogram (PERG). Paper presented at: NANOS, 1988.
- Background: PubMed 16552256Ventura LM, Porciatti V. Pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006 Apr;17(2):196-202. doi: 10.1097/01.icu.0000193082.44938.3c.
- Background: PubMed 17065502Bach M, Unsoeld AS, Philippin H, Staubach F, Maier P, Walter HS, Bomer TG, Funk J. Pattern ERG as an early glaucoma indicator in ocular hypertension: a long-term, prospective study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Nov;47(11):4881-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0875.
- Background: PubMed 10209726Kono Y, Jonas JB, Zangwill L, Berry CC, Weinreb RN. Agreement of measurement of parapapillary atrophy with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and planimetry of photographs. J Glaucoma. 1999 Apr;8(2):105-10.
- Background: PubMed 11390258Holder GE. Pattern electroretinography (PERG) and an integrated approach to visual pathway diagnosis. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2001 Jul;20(4):531-61. doi: 10.1016/s1350-9462(00)00030-6.
Related trials for Glaucoma
Recruiting
Effects of Balance Training in Individuals With Glaucoma
Glaucoma
Not yet recruiting
Glaucoma Drop Aids Part 2
Glaucoma, Intraocular Pressure
Not yet recruiting
PAUL® Glaucoma Implant Safety and Effectiveness Study
Refractory Glaucoma
Recruiting
The Acute Effect of Exercise Type And Timing on Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Intra-Ocular Pressure in Individuals With Glaucoma (The ACHIEVE-project).
Glaucoma Open-Angle Primary, Hypertension
RecruitingObservational study
Anterior Segment Anatomy Assessed by Swept-Source OCT in Ocular Surgery Patients
Cataract, Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Wollstein Gadi, MD principal investigator
University of Pittsburgh
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Glaucoma, run by Diopsys, Inc..
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Kristy Truman (412-383-8778, trumank@upmc.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
VEP Amplitude at 15% Contrast (time frame: Within 1 month prior to treatment). The study lists 24 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02594280, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jan 2018.