AzTrials
AzTrials

COPDNIVLEAKSNCT02599246

FiO2 in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patient Normobaric O2 Versus NIV

An observational study of COPD and Home Care, run by Breas Medical S.A.R.L. at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare pharyngeal FiO2 in day time with nasal normobaric O2 with inhaled FiO2 in the night time with home care ventilator NIV at the same O2 flow. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
COPD, Home Care, Oxygen Therapy
How many people
14 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
17 Nov 2015to 24 Feb 2016
How long will I take part?
1 Day
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. With day time oxygenotherapy and nocturnal NIV and O2 supply

Who may be able to join

  • informed consent

Who cannot join

  • acute on chronic respiratory distress

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Military teaching hospital Ste Anne

    Toulon, VAR, 83000

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Measured FiO2 With Nasal Canula O2 Versus Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) With the Same O2 Flow, in COPD Patients the NIV LEAKS Study

The purpose of this study is to compare pharyngeal FiO2 in day time with nasal normobaric O2 with inhaled FiO2 in the night time with home care ventilator NIV at the same O2 flow.

Read the detailed description

in a prospective observational study the investigators will register FiO2 in 15 voluntaries COPD patients as following:

  • Pharyngeal FiO2 (G5® Philips™ side stream FiO2) with O2 supply through nasal cannula at basal flow (flow needed by patient). In order to compare FiO2s the investigators will measure FiO2 with 150%, 75%, 50% and 25 % of basal Flow
  • And FiO2 during nocturnal NIV (pressure support ventilation; Vivo 50®, Bréas™), using facial or nasal masque (Confort Gel® Respironics™). O2 flow will be basal flow.
Keywords
Home ventilator, FiO2, O2, NIV, COPD
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Difference in FiO2 measured during NIV compared to the FiO2 measured during day time with nasal canula at similar O2 flow

    Measured: 18 hours

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Time spent below different O2 levels during NIV despite constant O2 flow and their correlation to day time FiO2 with nasal canula

    Measured: 18 hours

  2. levels of O2 adjustment needed to keep FiO2 stable with NIV

    Measured: 1 hour

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Nov 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start17 Nov 2015
  3. Primary completion22 Feb 2016
  4. Study completion24 Feb 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
14 participants (actual)
Target duration
1 Day
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02599246
Sponsor's protocol ID
NIVLEAKS1
Acronym
NIVLEAKS
Status last verified
Jan 2017
First submitted
2 Nov 2015
Last updated
1 Feb 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Cardinale M, Cungi PJ, Esnault P, Castagna O, Nguyen C, Daranda E, Bordes J, Arnal JM, Meaudre E, Goutorbe P. In COPD, Nocturnal Noninvasive Ventilation Reduces the FIO2 Delivered Compared With Long-Term Oxygen Therapy at the Same Flow. Respir Care. 2020 Dec;65(12):1897-1903. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07570. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

    PubMed 32694183

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of COPD and Home Care, run by Breas Medical S.A.R.L. at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Difference in FiO2 measured during NIV compared to the FiO2 measured during day time with nasal canula at similar O2 flow (time frame: 18 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02599246, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Feb 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in