Angioplasty, BalloonPhase 3INTACTNCT02599389
Comparison of Angioplasty/Drug Coated Balloon/Laser + Drug Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Artery In-stent Restenosis
A Phase 3 study testing Drug-coated balloons and Excimer Laser in people with Angioplasty, Balloon, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 13 sites in France.
Trial summary
The aim of this multicenter triple-arm randomized study is to compare two innovative techniques with the gold standard currently used and providing unsatisfactory results for the In-Stent Restenosis (ISR) treatment in femoro-popliteal arteries. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Angioplasty, Balloon
- What is being tested?
- Drug-coated balloons and Excimer Laser
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 222 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Dec 2015to May 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient of age > 18 years
- Patient with previously peripheral implanted stent(s) located in or extending to the popliteal artery
- Patient who received this stent between 3-36 months before inclusion
- Patient with one or more in-stent restenosis lesion(s) > 70% in the same arterial segment in association with clinical symptoms of claudication or an critical limb ischemia with Rutherford classification of 2, 3, 4 or 5
- Reference vessel diameter between 4 and 7 mm
- Patient affiliated to a social security regimen
- EC-approved consent form signed by the participant and the investigator (must be signed prior initiation of any study related intervention)
Who cannot join
- Life expectancy >18 months
- Patient already included in this study (recruitment of the contralateral leg is not allowed)
- Patient contraindicated for the use of antiplatelet therapy
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
- Patient with a target limb infection being treated
- Patient with a procoagulant blood disease
Show all 16Show fewer
- Patient with history of contrast agents allergies
- Patient with intolerance to paclitaxel
- Patient with severe renal impairment (GFR <30 ml / min / 1.73 m²) or patient with a creatinine clearance <15 ml / min
- External compression of previously implanted stent
- Patient participating in any clinical trial using another investigational drug or product which could interfere with the interpretation of the trial results.
- Patient under trusteeship or guardianship
- Angiographic exclusion criteria :
- Inflow (above) severe lesion >70% or occlusion untreated satisfactorily (residual lesion> 50%) before the management of the target lesion
- Perforation, dissection or lesions on the arterial network access requiring an assumption prior to randomization
- Stent fracture grade 4 or 5 at the target lesion
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 1 country.
13 sites in 1 country
France13 sites
Clinique Rhône Durance
Avignon, 84000
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon
Besançon, 25030
University Hospital of Bordeaux - Hospital Pellegrin
Bordeaux, 33000
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon
Dijon, 21079
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lyon, 69000
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes
Nantes, 44093
Polyclinique Les Fleurs
Ollioules, 83190
Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou - AP-HP de Paris
Paris, 75015
Clinique de L'Europe
Rouen, 76100
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de St Etienne
Saint-Etienne, 42055
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Strasbourg
Strasbourg, 67091
Clinique Pasteur
Toulouse, 31076
About this study
Official title: Economic Evaluation Comparing Standard Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-eluted Balloon or Laser-Excimer in Association With Drug-eluted Balloon in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery In-stent Restenosis.
The aim of this multicenter triple-arm randomized study is to compare two innovative techniques with the gold standard currently used and providing unsatisfactory results for the In-Stent Restenosis (ISR) treatment in femoro-popliteal arteries. This protocol compares the use of drug-coated balloons (paclitaxel - antimitotic) used alone or in association with the Excimer Laser to recalibrate the vessel lumen into the stent by destroying the whole fibrous material to the standard angioplasty using plain balloons. INTACT study main objective is to assess cost-effectiveness ratio of the treatment of femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis by comparing these two innovative strategies and the standard one in terms of cost per Qaly (Quality adjusted life-years) gained at 18 months from a collective perspective.
Read the detailed description
The publication show that there is probably an effectiveness gradient (expressed as a proportion of patients with in-stent restenosis a 18 months after the intervention of the first stenosis reduction): standard balloons would be less effective than active balloons themselves less effective than in combination with the excimer laser. Reducing the risk of In-Stent Restenosis has major implications for the treatment of patients because it reduces the use of arterial bypass or amputation, if unable to perform revascularization.
Based on these promising results of efficiency, we can hypothesize that the active balloons in combination with the Excimer laser would improve the quality of life of patients while reducing the cost of their treatment, this compared to only assets balloons. This same improvement in quality of life with reduced costs of care would be observed for only assets compared to standard balloons. In health economic terms, it is therefore likely that the strategy combining assets balloons and Excimer laser is dominant over assets balloons themselves dominant over standard balloons.
- Conditions
- Angioplasty, Balloon
- Being tested
- Drug-coated balloons, Excimer Laser
- Keywords
- in-stent restenosis; drug-coated balloons; Excimer Laser, cost effectiveness study, quality of life
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Drug-coated balloonsDevice
Also called In.Pact (Medtronic)
Excimer LaserDevice
Also called SPECTRANETICS
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard balloon | No intervention | Angioplasty with use of standard balloons |
| Drug-coated balloons | Experimental | Angioplasty with use of drug-coated balloons Receives: Device: Drug-coated balloons |
| Drug-coated balloons and laser | Experimental | Angioplasty with use of drug-coated balloons in association with Excimer Laser Receives: Device: Drug-coated balloons; Device: Excimer Laser |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incremental cost per Qaly gained at 18 months
Measured: 18 months after angioplasty
Incremental cost per avoided stenosis relapse at 18 months
Measured: 18 months after angioplasty
Secondary outcomes (9)
New In-stent restenosis during follow-up
No recurrence of in-stent restenosis > 50% during follow-up with doppler . The three treatment groups are compared.
Measured: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months after angioplasty
A major adverse event
Absence of major event during follow-up as death, lower limb amputation or lack of required revascularization.
Measured: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months after angioplasty
Improvement in the walking procedure
Improvement in the walking procedure performing by Strandness test
Measured: Before and 12 months after angioplasty
Clinical improvement
Clinical improvement by the Rutherford classification at 6, 12 and 18 months. This improvement is objectified by a decrease in category 1 or several classes.
Measured: 6 months, 12 months and 18 months after angioplasty
Systolic blood pressure Index
Index :ratio of brachial pressure and compressible leg artery pressure
Measured: 6 months, 12 months and 18 months after angioplasty
new treatment for the treated lesion
Measured: 6 months, 12 months and 18 months after angioplasty
revascularization, with restenosis of the treated lesion
Measured: 6 months, 12 months and 18 months after angioplasty
recurrence of clinical symptoms
Measured: 6 months, 12 months and 18 months after angioplasty
Blood ultrasonic doppler velocimetry
Measured: 6 months, 12 months and 18 months after angioplasty
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Nov 2015 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2015
- Primary completionMay 2020
- Study completionMay 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Angioplasty, BalloonStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, BordeauxThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 222 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Bordeaux
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Eric DUCASSE, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, BordeauxAntoine BENARD, MD, Study chair, Unité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche clinique et épidémiologique; University Hospital, Bordeaux
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02599389
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHUBX 2014/40
- Other IDs
- 2015-A00924-45
- Acronym
- INTACT
- Status last verified
- Nov 2019
- First submitted
- 5 Nov 2015
- Last updated
- 10 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Ducasse E, Sapoval M, Brunet J, Commeau P, Goueffic Y, Sabatier J, Steinmetz E, Lermusiaux P, Rosset E, Caradu C. Outcomes and Comparative Analysis of the Initial Results of Standard Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Coated Balloons Alone Versus in Association With Laser-Excimer Atherectomy in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery In-Stent Restenosis (INTACT). J Endovasc Ther. 2026 Feb;33(1):244-258. doi: 10.1177/15266028241248333. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
PubMed 38659343
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Economic Evaluation Comparing Standard Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-eluted Balloon or Laser-Excimer in Association With Drug-eluted Balloon in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery In-stent Restenosis.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02599389
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INTACT / CHUBX 2014/40
- Conditions
- Angioplasty, Balloon
- Keywords
- in-stent restenosis; drug-coated balloons; Excimer Laser, cost effectiveness study, quality of life
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 222 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, BordeauxUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- May 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Nov 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this multicenter triple-arm randomized study is to compare two innovative techniques with the gold standard currently used and providing unsatisfactory results for the In-Stent Restenosis (ISR) treatment in femoro-popliteal arteries. This protocol compares the use of drug-coated balloons (paclitaxel - antimitotic) used alone or in association with the Excimer Laser to recalibrate the vessel lumen into the stent by destroying the whole fibrous material to the standard angioplasty using plain balloons. INTACT study main objective is to assess cost-effectiveness ratio of the treatment of femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis by comparing these two innovative strategies and the standard one in terms of cost per Qaly (Quality adjusted life-years) gained at 18 months from a collective perspective.
Detailed description
The publication show that there is probably an effectiveness gradient (expressed as a proportion of patients with in-stent restenosis a 18 months after the intervention of the first stenosis reduction): standard balloons would be less effective than active balloons themselves less effective than in combination with the excimer laser. Reducing the risk of In-Stent Restenosis has major implications for the treatment of patients because it reduces the use of arterial bypass or amputation, if unable to perform revascularization.
Based on these promising results of efficiency, we can hypothesize that the active balloons in combination with the Excimer laser would improve the quality of life of patients while reducing the cost of their treatment, this compared to only assets balloons. This same improvement in quality of life with reduced costs of care would be observed for only assets compared to standard balloons. In health economic terms, it is therefore likely that the strategy combining assets balloons and Excimer laser is dominant over assets balloons themselves dominant over standard balloons.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard balloon | No intervention | –Angioplasty with use of standard balloons |
| Drug-coated balloons | Experimental | Device: Drug-coated balloonsAngioplasty with use of drug-coated balloons |
| Drug-coated balloons and laser | Experimental | Device: Drug-coated balloons, Device: Excimer LaserAngioplasty with use of drug-coated balloons in association with Excimer Laser |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patient of age > 18 years
- Patient with previously peripheral implanted stent(s) located in or extending to the popliteal artery
- Patient who received this stent between 3-36 months before inclusion
- Patient with one or more in-stent restenosis lesion(s) > 70% in the same arterial segment in association with clinical symptoms of claudication or an critical limb ischemia with Rutherford classification of 2, 3, 4 or 5
- Reference vessel diameter between 4 and 7 mm
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Life expectancy >18 months
- Patient already included in this study (recruitment of the contralateral leg is not allowed)
- Patient contraindicated for the use of antiplatelet therapy
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
- Patient with a target limb infection being treated
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Drug-coated balloonsAlso: In.Pact (Medtronic) | Device | Drug-coated balloons, Drug-coated balloons and laser |
| Excimer LaserAlso: SPECTRANETICS | Device | Drug-coated balloons and laser |
Primary outcome
Incremental cost per Qaly gained at 18 months
Time frame: 18 months after angioplasty
Incremental cost per avoided stenosis relapse at 18 months
Time frame: 18 months after angioplasty
9 secondary outcomes
New In-stent restenosis during follow-up
Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months after angioplasty
A major adverse event
Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months after angioplasty
Improvement in the walking procedure
Time frame: Before and 12 months after angioplasty
Clinical improvement
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months and 18 months after angioplasty
Systolic blood pressure Index
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months and 18 months after angioplasty
new treatment for the treated lesion
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months and 18 months after angioplasty
revascularization, with restenosis of the treated lesion
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months and 18 months after angioplasty
recurrence of clinical symptoms
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months and 18 months after angioplasty
Blood ultrasonic doppler velocimetry
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months and 18 months after angioplasty
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jun 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 38659343Ducasse E, Sapoval M, Brunet J, Commeau P, Goueffic Y, Sabatier J, Steinmetz E, Lermusiaux P, Rosset E, Caradu C. Outcomes and Comparative Analysis of the Initial Results of Standard Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Coated Balloons Alone Versus in Association With Laser-Excimer Atherectomy in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery In-Stent Restenosis (INTACT). J Endovasc Ther. 2026 Feb;33(1):244-258. doi: 10.1177/15266028241248333. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
Related trials for Angioplasty, Balloon
Recruiting
EVERO Drug-coated Balloon (DCB) Randomized Trial
Peripheral Vascular Disease, Peripheral Arterial Disease
Recruiting
Computational μFR-Guided Versus Angiographic Guidance in Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty
Coronary Artery Disease
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Laser Atherectomy and Sirolimus-eluting Balloon Angioplasty for CLTI
Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
TrEatment Approach in the Multimodal Era Registry
Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension, CTEPH
Recruiting
Late-lumen Changes After Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stents in De Novo Coronary Lesions
Coronary Artery Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eric DUCASSE, MD, PhD principal investigator
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Antoine BENARD, MD study chair
Unité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche clinique et épidémiologique; University Hospital, Bordeaux
13 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Drug-coated balloons and Excimer Laser in people with Angioplasty, Balloon, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 13 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incremental cost per Qaly gained at 18 months (time frame: 18 months after angioplasty). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02599389, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2026.