AzTrials
AzTrials

Urinary IncontinenceNCT02599831

Efficacy of Electrical Pudendal Nerve Stimulation for Patients With Post Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence

A study testing Electrical pudendal nerve stimulation, PFM training and Transanal ES in people with Urinary Incontinence, run by Shanghai Institute of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Meridian at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether electrical pudendal nerve stimulation is more effective than pelvic floor muscle training plus transanal electrical stimulation in treating post prostatectomy Incontinence. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 to 85 years, men only
Conditions the study is for
Urinary Incontinence
What is being tested?
Electrical pudendal nerve stimulation, PFM training and Transanal ES
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
96 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Nov 2015to Aug 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 to 85 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • incontinence at 1 month or more after RP
  • ≥2 incontinence episodes a week on baseline 7-day bladder diary
  • no residual cancer after RP on pathological examination

Who cannot join

  • the presence of preoperative incontinence
  • treatment with anticholinergics
  • urinary tract infection or hematuria
  • postvoid residual volume>100 mL

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Shanghai research institute of acupuncture and meridian

    Shanghai, 200030

Other trials in China

About this study

The purpose of this study is to determine whether electrical pudendal nerve stimulation is more effective than pelvic floor muscle training plus transanal electrical stimulation in treating post prostatectomy Incontinence.

Read the detailed description

Conservative therapy could be considered a choice of treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) as it seems to have no side effect and causes significant and long-term improvement in symptoms. Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and electrical stimulation are two commonly used forms of conservative treatment for SUI. PFMT improves the structural support of the pelvis. However, many patients have difficulty identifying and isolating their pelvic floor muscles (PFM) and are unable to perform the exercise effectively. Furthermore, patients who can identify the PFM often find that the required daily exercise routine is burdensome. Hence, the primary disadvantage of PFMT is lack of long-term patient compliance. Electrical stimulation (ES) is a non-invasive, passive treatment that produces a muscle contraction. Transanal electrical stimulation (TES) has little side-effect, and the patient compliance is 70-85% in published reports. TES results in PFM contraction by indirect nerve stimulation, mainly by polysynaptic reflex responses. The indirect stimulation and reflexive contraction may be the reason why the effect of electrical stimulation is not as good as that of PFMT when performed correctly. By combining the advantages of PFMT and TES and incorporating the technique of deep insertion of long acupuncture needles, we developed electrical pudendal nerve stimulation (EPNS). In EPNS, long acupuncture needles of 0.40 Х 100 or 125 mm were deeply inserted into four sacral points and electrified to stimulate the pudendal nerves (PN) and contract the PFM. CT transverse plane at the coccygeal apex has showed that the position of the lower needle tip is similar to where (adjacent to PN at Alcock's canal) the Bion device is implanted for chronic PN stimulation. Our previous study showed that EPNS had a better therapeutic effect on female SUI as compared with PFMT + TES. Simultaneous records of perineal ultrasonographic PFM contraction, vaginal pressure and pelvic floor surface electromyogram in our previous study have proved that EPNS can exactly excite PN and induce PFM contraction in female SUI patients. However, EPNS has also shown satisfactory effect in male patients with SUI problems. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of EPNS to PFMT + TES in treating male SUI.

Being tested
Electrical pudendal nerve stimulation, PFM training, Transanal ES
Keywords
Electrical pudendal nerve stimulation, Pelvic floor muscle training, Transanal electrical stimulation, Post radical prostatectomy incontinence, Comparative study
Medical subject headings
Urinary Incontinence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Electrical pudendal nerve stimulationDevice

    Also called G6805-2 Multi-Purpose Health Device

    Four sacrococcygeal points are selected. The two upper points are located about 1 cm bilateral to the sacrococcygeal joint. On the upper points, a needle of 0.40 Х 100 mm is inserted perpendicularly to a depth of 80 to 90 mm to produce a sensation referred to the root of the penis (perineum) or the anus. The locations of the two lower points are about 1 cm bilateral to the tip of the coccyx. On the lower points, a needle of 0.40 Х 100 or 125 mm is inserted obliquely towards the ischiorectal fossa to a depth of 90 to 110 mm to produce a sensation referred to the root of the penis (perineum). After the sensation referred to the above regions is produced, each of two pairs of electrodes from a G6805-2 Multi-Purpose Health Device is connected with the two ipsilaterally inserted needles.

  • PFM trainingDevice

    Also called AM1000B (Shenzhen Creative Industry Co.Ltd, China)

    A nerve function reconstruction treatment system (AM1000B; Shenzhen Creative Industry Co.Ltd, China) is used for EMG-biofeedback assisted PFMT.

  • Transanal ESDevice

    A neuromuscular stimulation therapy system (PHENIX USB 4,Electronic Concept Lignon Innovation, France) is used for TES

Study groups in NCT02599831
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Electrical pudendal nerve stimulationExperimentalFour sacrococcygeal points were selected. Two 0.40Х100 mm needles were inserted perpendicularly to a depth of 80-90 mm 1 cm bilateral to the sacrococcygeal joint, to produce a sensation referred to the root of the penis (perineum) or the anus. Two needles of 0.40Х100 or 125mm were inserted obliquely toward the ischiorectal fossa to a depth of 90 to 110 mm about 1 cm bilateral to the tip of the coccyx, to produce a sensation referred to the root of the penis (or the perineum). Each two ipsilaterally needles were connected to one electrode from a G6805-2Multi-Purpose Health Device (Shanghai Medical Instruments High-Techno, Shanghai, China), with a frequency of 2.5 Hz and an intensity (45~55 mA). EPNS was given for 60 min a time, 3 times per week for 8 weeks.
Receives: Device: Electrical pudendal nerve stimulation
PFM training with Transanal ESActive comparatorElectromyogram BF-assisted PFMT (using a nerve function reconstruction treatment system (AM1000B; Shenzhen Creative Industry Co. Ltd, China) and following TES (using a neuromuscular stimulation therapy system (PHENIX USB4, Electronic Concept Lignon Innovation, France)) at a current intensity of < 60 mA (as high as possible within the patient's tolerance) and frequencies of 15 Hz and 85 Hz (alternate 3-minute periods of stimulation) were performed by a specially trained therapist, 20 minutes each time, respectively (a total of 40 minutes), 3 times a week for a total of 8 weeks. The patients were also required to conduct 30 maximal high-intensity PFM contractions for 2-6 seconds (with 2-6 seconds rest), 3 sessions every day at home for a total of 8 weeks.
Receives: Device: PFM training; Device: Transanal ES

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. ICIQ-UI-SF

    International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence-Short Form

    Measured: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. diaper numbers

    none, 1-3 per week, 4-6 per week, 1-4 per day and more than 4 per day are scored 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively

    Measured: 8 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Nov 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2015
  3. Primary completionFeb 2017
  4. Study completionAug 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
96 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02599831
Sponsor's protocol ID
ZYSNXD-CC
Status last verified
Dec 2017
First submitted
29 Oct 2015
Last updated
27 Feb 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Electrical pudendal nerve stimulation, PFM training and Transanal ES in people with Urinary Incontinence, run by Shanghai Institute of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Meridian at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

ICIQ-UI-SF (time frame: 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in