AzTrials
AzTrials

Prostatic NeoplasmsNCT02600481

Impacts of Different Pressure Pneumoperitoneum on Myocardial and Pulmonary Injuries After Robot-assisted Surgery

A study testing low-pressure pneumoperitoneum and standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in people with Prostatic Neoplasms and Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, run by Huadong Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is aimed to determine whether low- and standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum have different impacts on troponin T(TnT) level as well as pulmonary complications after prolonged robot-assisted surgeries in the Trendelenburg position. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
low-pressure pneumoperitoneum and standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
280 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Jan 2016to Dec 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who are scheduled to undergo Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy or other robot-assisted urological surgeries last longer than 3 hours
  • Patients who are classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA)I and II
  • Patient's preoperative troponin T(TnT) level is normal

Who cannot join

  • Patients with preoperative cardiopulmonary dysfunction who can not understand prolonged surgeries in the Trendelenburg position:severe pulmonary dysfunction or New York Heart Association(NYHA) classification is Ⅲ-Ⅳ.
  • Body Mass Index>30.
  • Any intraoperative situation as follows:1. Any cause to cancel operation or change robot-assisted surgery to open surgery 2. Intraoperative cardiovascular accidents.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Ruijin Hospital

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200025

    Rong Dong, Doctor, +86-21-64370045, sally9132@163.com

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Impacts of Prolonged Low-pressure and Standard-pressure Pneumoperitoneum on Myocardial and Pulmonary Injuries After Robot-assisted Surgery in the Trendelenburg Position: a Bi-center, Randomized Controlled Trial

This study is aimed to determine whether low- and standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum have different impacts on troponin T(TnT) level as well as pulmonary complications after prolonged robot-assisted surgeries in the Trendelenburg position.

Read the detailed description

The hypothesis of this study is based on several studies reported that increased postoperative troponin T(TnT) level was significantly associated with 30-day mortality, and some other reports showed that low-pressure pneumoperitoneum had better haemodynamic outcome than that of standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum. Hence, we hypothesize that different pneumoperitoneal pressure may lead to different levels of TnT after prolonged robot-assisted surgeries.

This clinical trial will be conducted in Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University and Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,both are tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China.

After signing the Informed Consent, subjects who meet the eligibility criteria will be randomly assigned to low- or standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum group.The randomization plans will be implemented using statistical software R, and will be stored in an online database.These subjects will be recruited from January 1st 2016 to December 31st 2017.

TnT is set as the primary endpoint for this trial to evaluate the myocardial injuries, and will be measured for each patient who will undergo in-patient robot-assisted urological surgery within 24 hours postoperatively using the fourth-generation high-sensitivity TnT assay.

The total sample size will be 280.With 140 patients in each of the two treatment groups, the power will be at least 0.70 to detect an increment of TnT level among 80% of subjects.Chest CT scan is used to diagnose the pulmonary complications on the third day postoperatively.

Data will be collected to analysize whether prolonged different intraperitoneal pressure has different impacts on cardiopulmonary injuries.

Being tested
low-pressure pneumoperitoneum, standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum
Keywords
standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum, prolonged pneumoperitoneum, myocardial injuries, troponin T(TnT), Trendelenburg position, chest CT scan, low-pressure pneumoperitoneum, robot-assisted surgery
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Neoplasms, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • low-pressure pneumoperitoneumProcedure or surgery

    Using low-pressure(between 7-10 mm Hg ) pneumoperitoneum to complete robot-assisted surgeries,such as radical prostatectomy or cystectomy.

  • standard-pressure pneumoperitoneumProcedure or surgery

    Using standard-pressure (between 12-16 mm Hg )pneumoperitoneum to complete robot-assisted surgeries,such as radical prostatectomy or cystectomy.

Study groups in NCT02600481
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
low-pressure pneumoperitoneum groupExperimentalSubjects assigned to the low-pressure pneumoperitoneum group will receive 7-10 mm Hg carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum, and the expected duration is longer than 3 hours to complete robot-assisted surgeries in the Trendelenburg position;
Receives: Procedure: low-pressure pneumoperitoneum
standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum groupActive comparatorSubjects assigned to the standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum group will receive 12-16 mm Hg carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum, which is expected lasted longer than 3 hours to complete robot-assisted surgeries in the Trendelenburg position;
Receives: Procedure: standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Troponin T level is set as the marker of myocardial injuries after robot-assisted surgeries

    Measured: Within the first 24 hours after prolonged robot-assisted surgeries

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Chest CT scan is used to determine pulmonary complications

    Measured: On the third day after prolonged robot-assisted surgeries

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Nov 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2016
  3. Primary completionDec 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
280 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02600481
Sponsor's protocol ID
2015K060
Status last verified
Nov 2015
First submitted
5 Nov 2015
Last updated
10 Nov 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Finkelstein J, Eckersberger E, Sadri H, Taneja SS, Lepor H, Djavan B. Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: The European and US Experience. Rev Urol. 2010 Winter;12(1):35-43.

    PubMed 20428292
  • Orvieto MA, Patel VR. Evolution of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Scand J Surg. 2009;98(2):76-88. doi: 10.1177/145749690909800203.

    PubMed 19799045
  • Hakimi AA, Feder M, Ghavamian R. Minimally invasive approaches to prostate cancer: a review of the current literature. Urol J. 2007 Summer;4(3):130-7.

    PubMed 17987573
  • Meininger D, Byhahn C, Bueck M, Binder J, Kramer W, Kessler P, Westphal K. Effects of prolonged pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamics and acid-base balance during totally endoscopic robot-assisted radical prostatectomies. World J Surg. 2002 Dec;26(12):1423-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-002-6404-7. Epub 2002 Sep 26.

    PubMed 12297911
  • Yiannakopoulou ECh, Nikiteas N, Perrea D, Tsigris C. Effect of laparoscopic surgery on oxidative stress response: systematic review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Apr;23(2):101-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182827b33.

    PubMed 23579502
  • Sharma KC, Kabinoff G, Ducheine Y, Tierney J, Brandstetter RD. Laparoscopic surgery and its potential for medical complications. Heart Lung. 1997 Jan-Feb;26(1):52-64; quiz 65-7. doi: 10.1016/s0147-9563(97)90009-1.

    PubMed 9013221
  • Leduc LJ, Mitchell A. Intestinal ischemia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS. 2006 Apr-Jun;10(2):236-8.

    PubMed 16882427
  • de Cleva R, Silva FP, Zilberstein B, Machado DJ. Acute renal failure due to abdominal compartment syndrome: report on four cases and literature review. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2001 Jul-Aug;56(4):123-30. doi: 10.1590/s0041-87812001000400006.

    PubMed 11717720
  • Imamoglu M, Sapan L, Tekelioglu Y, Sarihan H. Long-term effects of elevated intra-abdominal pressure on testes an experimental model of laparoscopy. Urol J. 2013 Sep 26;10(3):953-9.

    PubMed 24078502
  • Joris JL, Chiche JD, Canivet JL, Jacquet NJ, Legros JJ, Lamy ML. Hemodynamic changes induced by laparoscopy and their endocrine correlates: effects of clonidine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Nov;32(5):1389-96. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00406-9.

    PubMed 9809953
  • Russo A, Marana E, Viviani D, Polidori L, Colicci S, Mettimano M, Proietti R, Di Stasio E. Diastolic function: the influence of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg positioning during laparoscopic hysterectomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Nov;26(11):923-7. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832cb3c9.

    PubMed 19696680
  • Sharma KC, Brandstetter RD, Brensilver JM, Jung LD. Cardiopulmonary physiology and pathophysiology as a consequence of laparoscopic surgery. Chest. 1996 Sep;110(3):810-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.110.3.810. No abstract available.

    PubMed 8797429
  • Wahba RW, Beique F, Kleiman SJ. Cardiopulmonary function and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Anaesth. 1995 Jan;42(1):51-63. doi: 10.1007/BF03010572.

    PubMed 7889585
  • Hanaoka M, Hara Y, Fujiogi M, Fujisawa N, Kawakami M, Shioiri S, Tanaka M, Yasuno M. Pulmonary edema after laparoscopic hepatectomy in a patient with Budd-Chiari syndrome-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015 May;8(2):197-200. doi: 10.1111/ases.12152.

    PubMed 25913587
  • Aydin V, Kabukcu HK, Sahin N, Mesci A, Arici AG, Kahveci G, Ozmete O. Comparison of pressure and volume-controlled ventilation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations. Clin Respir J. 2016 May;10(3):342-9. doi: 10.1111/crj.12223. Epub 2014 Nov 14.

    PubMed 25307158

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing low-pressure pneumoperitoneum and standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in people with Prostatic Neoplasms and Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, run by Huadong Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Nov 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Weidong Gu, Doctor (+86-21-62483180 ext. 70603, mcwgwd@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Troponin T level is set as the marker of myocardial injuries after robot-assisted surgeries (time frame: Within the first 24 hours after prolonged robot-assisted surgeries). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02600481, which also lists 28 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Nov 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in