AzTrials
AzTrials

Blood Coagulation DisorderFF8NCT02601053

The Fear F8ctor Study - Does Fear Induce a Blood Curdling State?

A study testing Dull movie, Scary (horrifying) movie and Heart rate measurement in people with Blood Coagulation Disorder, run by Leiden University Medical Center.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

For centuries the term "blood curling" has been used to describe extreme frightening situations. However, the origin of this ancient theory has never been studied and it remains unknown if fear induces the coagulation system.The objective was to explore the effects of acute fear on the coagulation system while sitting… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 30 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Blood Coagulation Disorder
What is being tested?
Dull movie, Scary (horrifying) movie and Heart rate measurement
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
24 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jun 2015to Sep 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 30 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy volunteers between 18 and 30 years old
  • No medication and otherwise healthy

Who cannot join

  • Any coagulation disorder
  • Hormonal anticonception (excluding intrauterine devices)
  • Pregnancy or puerperium
  • History of Venous thrombosis
  • Major surgery or cast immobilisation in the past two months
  • Neoplasm or inflammatory disease

About this study

Official title: The Fear F8ctor Study - Does Fear Induce a Blood Curdling State? The Origin Behind the Phrase Unravelled

For centuries the term "blood curling" has been used to describe extreme frightening situations. However, the origin of this ancient theory has never been studied and it remains unknown if fear induces the coagulation system.The objective was to explore the effects of acute fear on the coagulation system while sitting still. In a crossover study design healthy subjects will be exposed to a horrifying e.g. scary movie followed by a dull e.g. flat movie which is shown at least 1 week after the first movie on the same day of the week at the same time of the day. Participants will be recruited among students from the Leiden University Medical Center. Blood will be drawn from the cubital vein 10 minutes before the first movie, directly after the first movie. The same will be done 10 minutes before and directly after the second movie. Blood is drawn by using a needle puncture.

Individual markers of coagulation activity will be determined from the blood samples. Pulse rates will be measured and an anxiety/fear score will be collected from each student for both movies.

Read the detailed description

Rationale: For centuries the term "blood curling" has been used to describe extreme frightening situations. The term dates back to the medieval physiology, it was believed that the human body contained four chief fluids, blood, phlegm, bile and black bile. It was thought that fear or horror would 'run the blood cold' or 'curdle' (solidify). To date large parts of the complex mechanism of the coagulation cascade have been unravelled and many risk factors for clotting, i.e., thrombosis have been identified. However, the origin of this ancient theory has never been studied and it remains unknown if fear induces the coagulation system.

Objective: To explore the effects of acute fear on the coagulation system while sitting still.

The investigators will compare systemic coagulation markers before and after both movies in each subject: 13 subjects will be exposed to the horrifying movie first, followed by the dull movie (at least 1 week later). Both movies will be shown on the same day of the week, at the same time of the day and will last approximately 90 minutes. One group of 13 will first view the horrifying movie, followed by the dull move the next week (Group I) and 13 subjects will be exposed to the dull movie first, followed by the horrifying movie (Group II). Spacious seats will be used to avoid the effect of immobilisation due to tight cinema seats. Blood is drawn at four time points (TP); (0) before the first movie (baseline), after the first movie (1), before the second movie (2) and after the second movie (3). A needle puncture is used to collect 12 ml of blood at each time point.

Individual markers of coagulation activity will be determined from the blood samples. Pulse rates will be measured and an anxiety/fear score will be collected from each student for both movies.

Being tested
Dull movie, Scary (horrifying) movie, Heart rate measurement
Medical subject headings
Blood Coagulation Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dull movieOther

    A dull movie (duration approximately 90 minutes)

  • Scary (horrifying) movieOther

    A scary movie (duration approximately 90 minutes)

  • Heart rate measurementOther

    Heart rate measurement using a actiheart device

Study groups in NCT02601053
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dull (boring) movieActive comparatorParticipants will be exposed to a dull (i.e. boring) movie followed by a scary (i.e. horrifying) movie.
Receives: Other: Dull movie; Other: Scary (horrifying) movie; Other: Heart rate measurement
Scary (horrifying) movieExperimentalParticipants will be exposed to a scary (i.e. horrifying) movie followed by a to a dull (i.e. boring) movie.
Receives: Other: Dull movie; Other: Scary (horrifying) movie; Other: Heart rate measurement

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Factor VIII:C (mean change before and after movie) between movies

    The mean change in FVIII:C (in IU/dL) levels after seeing a scary movie (ie from timepoint 0 to 1 in study arm I and from timepoint 2 to timepoint 3 for treatment arm II will be compared to the mean change after seeing a dull movie. A paired student t-test is used to compare the two mean changes in coagulation markers.

    Measured: Four time points (TP); (0) before the first movie (baseline), after the first movie [90 minutes](1), before the second movie (baseline, 2) and after the second movie [90 minutes](3). All blood will be drawn within 15 minutes before or after the movie.

  2. Change in D-dimer (mean change before and after movie) between movies

    The mean change in D-dimer(in ng/mL) levels after seeing a scary movie (ie from timepoint 0 to 1 in study arm I and from timepoint 2 to timepoint 3 for treatment arm II will be compared to the mean change after seeing a dull movie. A paired student t-test is used to compare the two mean changes in coagulation markers.

    Measured: Four time points (TP); (0) before the first movie (baseline), after the first movie [90 minutes](1), before the second movie (baseline, 2) and after the second movie [90 minutes](3). All blood will be drawn within 15 minutes before or after the movie.

  3. Change in Thrombin and Antithrombin complexes (TATc) (mean change before and after movie) between movies

    The mean change in TATc (in mcg/L) levels after seeing a scary movie (ie from timepoint 0 to 1 in study arm I and from timepoint 2 to timepoint 3 for treatment arm II will be compared to the mean change after seeing a dull movie. A paired student t-test is used to compare the two mean changes in coagulation markers.

    Measured: Four time points (TP); (0) before the first movie (baseline), after the first movie [90 minutes](1), before the second movie (baseline, 2) and after the second movie [90 minutes](3). All blood will be drawn within 15 minutes before or after the movie.

  4. Change in Prothrombin fragments 1+2 (F1+2) (mean change before and after movie) between movies

    The mean change in F1+2 (in umol/dL) levels after seeing a scary movie (ie from timepoint 0 to 1 in study arm I and from timepoint 2 to timepoint 3 for treatment arm II will be compared to the mean change after seeing a dull movie. A paired student t-test is used to compare the two mean changes in coagulation markers.

    Measured: Four time points (TP); (0) before the first movie (baseline), after the first movie [90 minutes](1), before the second movie (baseline, 2) and after the second movie [90 minutes](3). All blood will be drawn within 15 minutes before or after the movie.

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Difference of Heart Rate (peaks in heart rate) between movies

    Heart rates will be measures in beats per minute during the entire movie, using an actiheart device that monitores the heart rate every 15 seconds.

    Measured: During the entire movie the heart rate is recorded [up to 90 minutes]. Heart rate peaks (above average) will be compared between movies in one individual.

  2. Difference of the Visual Analogue Scale on Fear between movies

    A VAS (0-10 points) on fear is recorded from every participant after they have seen the dull and scary movie.

    Measured: VAS scale, directly after dull movie [90 minutes] and directly after scary movie [90 minutes] for each individual

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Nov 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2015
  3. Primary completionAug 2015
  4. Study completionSep 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
24 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02601053
Sponsor's protocol ID
P15.146
Other IDs
NL53805.058.15
Acronym
FF8
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
5 Nov 2015
Last updated
5 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Nemeth B, Scheres LJ, Lijfering WM, Rosendaal FR. Bloodcurdling movies and measures of coagulation: Fear Factor crossover trial. BMJ. 2015 Dec 16;351:h6367. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6367.

    PubMed 26673787

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Dull movie, Scary (horrifying) movie and Heart rate measurement in people with Blood Coagulation Disorder, run by Leiden University Medical Center.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Factor VIII:C (mean change before and after movie) between movies (time frame: Four time points (TP); (0) before the first movie (baseline), after the first movie [90 minutes](1), before the second movie (baseline, 2) and after the second movie [90 minutes](3). All blood will be drawn within 15 minutes before or after the movie.). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02601053, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in