AzTrials
AzTrials

Vascular Access ComplicationNCT02602665

Central Line Placement-EVALUATION OF LINE DEPTH AS A FACTOR IN NEED FOR LINE REPLACEMENT SECONDARY TO MALPOSITION

A study testing Shallow catheter tip placement and Deep catheter tip placement in people with Vascular Access Complication, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a single center, randomized, controlled trial in which tunneled central line catheters will be placed in two distinct, select positions. The catheter tip position will then be followed up prospectively after placement to determine whether there is any malpositioning of the tip and if one placement is better… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 18 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Vascular Access Complication
What is being tested?
Shallow catheter tip placement and Deep catheter tip placement
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Dec 2019to 28 Dec 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Children from 0-18 years of age needing a tunneled central line (port or broviac) for treatment of their disease.

Who cannot join

  • Wire exchanged lines
  • Non ultrasound placed lines, femoral lines, saphenous vein lines, and cut downs
  • Short gut syndrome children < 1 year of age

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • The University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Central Line Placement Study -EVALUATION OF LINE DEPTH AS A FACTOR IN NEED FOR LINE REPLACEMENT SECONDARY TO MALPOSITION

This is a single center, randomized, controlled trial in which tunneled central line catheters will be placed in two distinct, select positions. The catheter tip position will then be followed up prospectively after placement to determine whether there is any malpositioning of the tip and if one placement is better than the other.

Read the detailed description

Optimal central line placement is vital to catheter longevity. If malpositioned, the catheter may need to get replaced, potentially causing additional morbidity to the patient and additional cost to the healthcare system. In our department, a retrospective study looking at catheter tip position at inital placement and incidence of malposition. In this study, 404 catheter placements were reviewed, and a total of 162 (40.1%) were replaced. Out of the 162 replaced, 36 (22.2%) were replaced secondary to malposition. From this study, we were also able to conclude that catheter tips placed in a deeper position, approximately one and a half vertebral bodies below the carina, were less likely to be malpositioned in the future upon radiographic review.

Current standard of care does not dictate positioning of the line in a specific loacation. In the presence of these findings, we are proposing to conduct a single center randomized control trial in which tunneled central line catheters will be placed in two distinct, select positions. After informed consent is obtained from the patient and family, they will be randomized to one of two treatment groups. The shallow group will have the tip of the catheter located approximately one vertebral body above the carina. The deep group will have the catheter tip placed 1.5 to 2.5 vertebral bodies below the carina. Central line placement will be performed under fluoroscopy in the operating room to optimize catheter placement. Chest X ray in the post operative area will be used to confirm catheter tip position. The catheter tip position will then be followed up prospectively using chest X ray films at or within three months after placement to determine whether there is any malpositioning of the tip.

Being tested
Shallow catheter tip placement, Deep catheter tip placement
Keywords
catheter placement

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Shallow catheter tip placementProcedure or surgery

    for shallow placement tip of catheter placed 1 vertebral body above to even with the carina

  • Deep catheter tip placementProcedure or surgery

    deep placement catheter tip is placed 1.5 to 2.5 vertebral bodies below the carina

Study groups in NCT02602665
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Shallow catheter tip placementExperimentalPatients randomized to shallow tip placement will have the tip of the catheter placed approximately one vertebral body above to even with the carina.
Receives: Procedure: Shallow catheter tip placement
Deep catheter tip placementExperimentalPatients randomized to deep tip placement will have the tip of the catheter placed 1.5 to 2.5 vertebral bodies below the carina.
Receives: Procedure: Deep catheter tip placement

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Malposition

    The primary outcome measure of this study is to determine whether the position of the tip during central line placement plays a role in malposition during further evaluation of these patients. This will be determined with chest X-ray done at or within 90 days after line insertion. All non-ultrasound guided lines and those placed by cut down procedure will be tallied in a prospective manner to calculate the number of lines placed without radiological guidance. Number of attempts required to place the line (number of times the needle is removed exterior to the skin, i.e. number of skin punctures.)

    Measured: 90 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Nov 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Dec 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion28 Dec 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion28 Dec 2021 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Design was not feasible

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02602665
Sponsor's protocol ID
98248
Status last verified
Jan 2020
First submitted
9 Nov 2015
Last updated
18 Jan 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Shallow catheter tip placement and Deep catheter tip placement in people with Vascular Access Complication, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Malposition (time frame: 90 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jan 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT02602665 | AzTrials