Hereditary Spastic ParaplegiaPhase 2/3SPASTOXNCT02604186
Effects of Botulinum Toxin Injections in Patients With Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia
A Phase 2/3 study testing Botulinum Toxin Injections in people with Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia, run by University of Campinas, Brazil at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
Hereditary spastic paraplegias constitute a heterogeneous group of diseases with the common predominant feature of spasticity of the lower limbs. The clinical picture is composed of difficulty walking, exaggerated deep reflexes, pathological reflexes such as the Babinski sign, sphincter disturbances and various… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia
- What is being tested?
- Botulinum Toxin Injections
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 55 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 9 Mar 2016to 15 Mar 2017
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age between 18 and 80 years
- Clinical diagnosis of Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia
- Ability to walk at least 10 meters: Assistive devices are permitted
Who cannot join
- Wheelchair bound patients
- Additional neurological symptoms that may significantly impact gait such as ataxia, polyneuropathy or dementia.
- Fixed tendon contractures
- Antecedents of allergy or adverse reaction to botulinum toxin
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding condition
- Mental retardation
- Dementia
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Botulinum Toxin in Patients With Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Crossover Study
Hereditary spastic paraplegias constitute a heterogeneous group of diseases with the common predominant feature of spasticity of the lower limbs. The clinical picture is composed of difficulty walking, exaggerated deep reflexes, pathological reflexes such as the Babinski sign, sphincter disturbances and various degrees of weakness as well as sensory disturbances.
Spasticity is the symptom that provoques greater incapacity. Although there have been recent advances in the genetic and pathogenic characterization of SPG there is scarcity of therapeutic options. The Botulinum Toxin (BTx) is a well established treatment for movement disorders such as cervical dystonia, blepharospasm, and arm spastic following stroke.
Therefore, the investigators propose the execution of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment with Btx over SPG patient's gait. The primary outcome measure will be gait velocity with the 10 meter walking test 8 weeks after injection. Each participant will be submitted to one injection session of Btx and one of placebo (consisting of sterile sodium chloride), each one separated by a period of 6 months. The primary and secondary outcomes will be evaluated by a blind investigator 8 weeks after each injection session.
Read the detailed description
Introduction
Hereditary spastic paraplegias (SPG) constitute a heterogeneous group of diseases with a common predominant feature: spasticity of the lower limbs and difficulty walking. The neurologic examination reveals spasticity, exaggerated and pathological reflexes, such as the Babinski sign, and minor hypoesthesia. Spasticity is more evident when the patient walks than during passive movement. Weakness may or may not be present, and typically is less disabling than spasticity, especially during the initial years of the disease. The increase in tonus leads to reduced amplitude of movement and abnormal posture, altogether leading to a very slow gait, falls and articular deformities. Clinically, SPG is divided into pure and complicated forms. The first one is characterized by almost exclusive dysfunction of the pyramidal tracts. Minor sensory and sphincter disturbances are also present. The complicated subtypes encompass a wide variety of associated features such as ataxia, cognitive decline and vision loss. Genetically, SPGs are divided into autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive and X-linked forms. Pure forms are mostly inherited in an autosomal dominant manner, whereas the autosomal recessive forms mostly manifest as complicated forms. Although useful clinically, this genotype-phenotype correlation is not always true. The most used SPG classification is based on the locus that harbors the mutated gene. Each subtype is designated by the initials SPG, followed by a number that corresponds to a specific gene. The gene number is established following the chronological order of identification of each locus.
The discovery of new genes and the unraveling of molecular pathways of SPGs have lead to a better understanding of the disease in the past few years. Despite that, there are very few treatment options . There is no placebo-controlled clinical trial performed to assess any therapeutic intervention for SPG. Oral anti-spastic agents such as baclofen and tizanidine are frequently employed. When the response is inadequate, or there are significant side effects, botulinum toxin injections may be attempted. The substance blocks liberation of acetylcholine from the pre-synaptic cleft. With less activation of the nicotinic receptors at the post-synaptic junction the muscle contraction is inhibited. Botulinum Toxin (Btx) is a first-line treatment for movement disorders such as cervical dystonia, blepharospasm, and spastic arm following stroke. Studies with Btx in patients with SPG are limited to small open-label case series, and there is no solid evidence that patients actually benefit from this therapy. The rationale basis for its use is based on the well established knowledge that Btx reduces muscle tonus. The functional impact on gait, on the other hand, is not well known, as well as the impact this treatment could produce over symptoms such as fatigue and pain.
Justification Spasticity is the most disabling manifestation in patients with SPG. Although there have been recent advances in the genetic and pathogenic characterization of the disease, there is scarcity of therapeutic options. The use of oral anti-spastics is limited by frequent side effects such as somnolence and drowsiness. Therefore, the investigators designed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Btx injections in patients with SPG. The primary outcome measure will be gait velocity assessed through the 10 meter walking test 8 weeks after injection. Each participant will be submitted to one injection session with Btx and one with placebo (consisting of sterile sodium chloride), each one separated by a period of 6 months.
Objectives General Objective To evaluate the effects of Btx compared to placebo injections in a cohort of patients with SPG. The primary outcome will be increase in gait velocity, a measure that reflects functional gain. Secondary outcomes will include measures of spasticity, pain and fatigue.
Specific Objectives
- To investigate whether Btx injections improve maximum gait velocity in patients with SPG compared to injections of placebo.
- To investigate the effects of the treatment versus placebo over the following functional measures: Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS), Visual Analogic Pain Scale, Brief Pain inventory, Modified fatigue impact scale, Ashworth Spasticity and muscle strength (through the Medical Research Council Scale) for adductors and triceps surae muscles.
Methods Patients Selection Patients will be selected during regular consultations at two University Hospitals in Brazil: the University of Campinas (UNICAMP) and the Federal University of Paraná (UFPR).
Sample size Estimate The sample size calculus was based on a recent exploratory study (Niet, 2015) where 15 patients with autosomal dominant spastic paraplegia were submitted to Btx injections at the triceps surae. This provoked and increase in gait velocity of 9% after 4 weeks and of 12% after 18 weeks. Estimating a 12% effect for an alfa value of 0.08 and a p value of 0.05, the investigators obtained a N of 54 individuals after correcting for possible losses (approximately 10%). The Stata version 13.1 was used for the estimates.
Procedures All patients recruited will be randomized to receive injections of Prosigne (Botulinum Toxin A) or a Placebo solution (sterile Sodium Chloride 0.9%). Each patient in the treatment group will receive 400 units of botulinum toxin. 100 units will be injected at adductors at each leg and 100 units will be applied in each triceps surae bilaterally. The botulinum toxin as well as the placebo solutions will be prepared by a blind investigator. Prosigne will be diluted with sterile sodium chloride (10U/0.2mL). Within 24 to 28 weeks of the first treatment groups will be switched. Those patients that received botulinum toxin will receive a placebo solution and vice-versa (crossover point). During the study, all patients will be oriented to maintain the ongoing use of medications. They will receive an explanatory sheet regarding stretching exercises, at least one month before receiving treatment, and will be trained by a physiotherapist to execute those exercises twice a week.
Data analysis and interpretation Patients will be evaluated by an experienced and blind neurologist regarding the efficacy parameters of the study. This evaluation will take place immediately before each treatment section and 8 weeks after it. The primary outcome measure will be maximum gait velocity. Each patient will be asked to walk a 10 meter distance barefooted 3 times, as fast as he can. The average velocity between the 3 trials will be used as the final measure. Assistive devices are permitted. Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS), Ashworth modified spasticity scale, medical research council scale for muscular strength (for adductors, thigh and triceps surae muscle groups), visual analogic scale of pain, brief pain inventory and the modified fatigue impact scale, together with the 10 meter comfortable walking velocity, will be evaluated at the same day as the primary outcome measure and will serve as secondary outcome measures.
- Conditions
- Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia
- Being tested
- Botulinum Toxin Injections, Placebo Injections
- Keywords
- Spasticity, Botulinum Toxin, Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia
- Medical subject headings
- Spastic Paraplegia, Hereditary, Muscle Spasticity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Botulinum Toxin InjectionsOther
Each patient in the treatment group will receive 400 units of botulinum toxin. 100 units will be injected at adductors at each leg and 100 units will be applied in each triceps surae bilaterally.
Placebo InjectionsOther
Each patient in the placebo group will receive sterile sodium chloride injections at adductors and triceps surae muscles bilaterally.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Botulinum Toxin Injections | Experimental | Botulinum Toxin injections at adductors and triceps surae Receives: Other: Botulinum Toxin Injections |
| Placebo Injections | Placebo comparator | Placebo injections at adductors and triceps surae Receives: Other: Placebo Injections |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline in 10 meter maximum gate velocity
The primary outcome measure will be change from baseline in maximum gait velocity. Each patient will be asked to walk a 10 meter distance barefooted 3 times, as fast as he can. The average velocity between the 3 trials will be used as the final measure. Assistive devices are permitted.
Measured: 8 weeks after injections
Secondary outcomes (7)
Change from baseline in Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS),
The same neurologist will examine the patient to evaluate change at the SPRS scale
Measured: 8 weeks after each procedure
Change from baseline in Ashworth spasticity scale of adductors and triceps surae muscles
The same neurologist will examine the patient to evaluate change from baseline
Measured: 8 weeks after each procedure
Change from baseline in muscle strengh (Medical Research Council scale) concerning adductors and triceps surae muscles.
The same neurologist will examine the patient to evaluate change from baseline
Measured: 8 weeks after each procedure
Change from baseline in visual analogic scale of pain
this scale will be applied by a neurologic physiotherapist
Measured: 8 weeks after each procedure
Change from baseline in brief pain inventory scale
this scale will be applied by a neurologic physiotherapist
Measured: 8 weeks after each procedure
Change from baseline in modified fatigue impact scale
this scale will be applied by a neurologic physiotherapist
Measured: 8 weeks after each procedure
Change from baseline in 10 meter comfortable walking velocity
this scale will be applied by a neurologic physiotherapist
Measured: 8 weeks after each procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Nov 2015 (estimated)
- Study start9 Mar 2016
- Primary completion15 Mar 2017
- Study completion15 Mar 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hereditary Spastic ParaplegiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Campinas, Brazil
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Cristália Produtos Químicos Farmacêuticos Ltda.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Marcondes Cavalcante França Júnior, University of Campinas, Brazil
- Investigators
- Marcondes c França Júnior, M.D, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Campinas, Brazil
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02604186
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CAAE: 48177315.9.1001.5404
- Acronym
- SPASTOX
- Status last verified
- Nov 2017
- First submitted
- 9 Nov 2015
- Last updated
- 7 Nov 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
de Niet M, de Bot ST, van de Warrenburg BP, Weerdesteyn V, Geurts AC. Functional effects of botulinum toxin type-A treatment and subsequent stretching of spastic calf muscles: a study in patients with hereditary spastic paraplegia. J Rehabil Med. 2015 Feb;47(2):147-53. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1909.
PubMed 25325386
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Nov 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Botulinum Toxin in Patients With Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Crossover Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02604186
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SPASTOX / CAAE: 48177315.9.1001.5404
- Conditions
- Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia
- Keywords
- Spasticity, Botulinum Toxin, Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Campinas, BrazilUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Cristália Produtos Químicos Farmacêuticos Ltda.
- Study start
- 9 Mar 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Mar 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Nov 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hereditary spastic paraplegias constitute a heterogeneous group of diseases with the common predominant feature of spasticity of the lower limbs. The clinical picture is composed of difficulty walking, exaggerated deep reflexes, pathological reflexes such as the Babinski sign, sphincter disturbances and various degrees of weakness as well as sensory disturbances.
Spasticity is the symptom that provoques greater incapacity. Although there have been recent advances in the genetic and pathogenic characterization of SPG there is scarcity of therapeutic options. The Botulinum Toxin (BTx) is a well established treatment for movement disorders such as cervical dystonia, blepharospasm, and arm spastic following stroke.
Therefore, the investigators propose the execution of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment with Btx over SPG patient's gait. The primary outcome measure will be gait velocity with the 10 meter walking test 8 weeks after injection. Each participant will be submitted to one injection session of Btx and one of placebo (consisting of sterile sodium chloride), each one separated by a period of 6 months. The primary and secondary outcomes will be evaluated by a blind investigator 8 weeks after each injection session.
Detailed description
Introduction
Hereditary spastic paraplegias (SPG) constitute a heterogeneous group of diseases with a common predominant feature: spasticity of the lower limbs and difficulty walking. The neurologic examination reveals spasticity, exaggerated and pathological reflexes, such as the Babinski sign, and minor hypoesthesia. Spasticity is more evident when the patient walks than during passive movement. Weakness may or may not be present, and typically is less disabling than spasticity, especially during the initial years of the disease. The increase in tonus leads to reduced amplitude of movement and abnormal posture, altogether leading to a very slow gait, falls and articular deformities. Clinically, SPG is divided into pure and complicated forms. The first one is characterized by almost exclusive dysfunction of the pyramidal tracts. Minor sensory and sphincter disturbances are also present. The complicated subtypes encompass a wide variety of associated features such as ataxia, cognitive decline and vision loss. Genetically, SPGs are divided into autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive and X-linked forms. Pure forms are mostly inherited in an autosomal dominant manner, whereas the autosomal recessive forms mostly manifest as complicated forms. Although useful clinically, this genotype-phenotype correlation is not always true. The most used SPG classification is based on the locus that harbors the mutated gene. Each subtype is designated by the initials SPG, followed by a number that corresponds to a specific gene. The gene number is established following the chronological order of identification of each locus.
The discovery of new genes and the unraveling of molecular pathways of SPGs have lead to a better understanding of the disease in the past few years. Despite that, there are very few treatment options . There is no placebo-controlled clinical trial performed to assess any therapeutic intervention for SPG. Oral anti-spastic agents such as baclofen and tizanidine are frequently employed. When the response is inadequate, or there are significant side effects, botulinum toxin injections may be attempted. The substance blocks liberation of acetylcholine from the pre-synaptic cleft. With less activation of the nicotinic receptors at the post-synaptic junction the muscle contraction is inhibited. Botulinum Toxin (Btx) is a first-line treatment for movement disorders such as cervical dystonia, blepharospasm, and spastic arm following stroke. Studies with Btx in patients with SPG are limited to small open-label case series, and there is no solid evidence that patients actually benefit from this therapy. The rationale basis for its use is based on the well established knowledge that Btx reduces muscle tonus. The functional impact on gait, on the other hand, is not well known, as well as the impact this treatment could produce over symptoms such as fatigue and pain.
Justification Spasticity is the most disabling manifestation in patients with SPG. Although there have been recent advances in the genetic and pathogenic characterization of the disease, there is scarcity of therapeutic options. The use of oral anti-spastics is limited by frequent side effects such as somnolence and drowsiness. Therefore, the investigators designed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Btx injections in patients with SPG. The primary outcome measure will be gait velocity assessed through the 10 meter walking test 8 weeks after injection. Each participant will be submitted to one injection session with Btx and one with placebo (consisting of sterile sodium chloride), each one separated by a period of 6 months.
Objectives General Objective To evaluate the effects of Btx compared to placebo injections in a cohort of patients with SPG. The primary outcome will be increase in gait velocity, a measure that reflects functional gain. Secondary outcomes will include measures of spasticity, pain and fatigue.
Specific Objectives
- To investigate whether Btx injections improve maximum gait velocity in patients with SPG compared to injections of placebo.
- To investigate the effects of the treatment versus placebo over the following functional measures: Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS), Visual Analogic Pain Scale, Brief Pain inventory, Modified fatigue impact scale, Ashworth Spasticity and muscle strength (through the Medical Research Council Scale) for adductors and triceps surae muscles.
Methods Patients Selection Patients will be selected during regular consultations at two University Hospitals in Brazil: the University of Campinas (UNICAMP) and the Federal University of Paraná (UFPR).
Sample size Estimate The sample size calculus was based on a recent exploratory study (Niet, 2015) where 15 patients with autosomal dominant spastic paraplegia were submitted to Btx injections at the triceps surae. This provoked and increase in gait velocity of 9% after 4 weeks and of 12% after 18 weeks. Estimating a 12% effect for an alfa value of 0.08 and a p value of 0.05, the investigators obtained a N of 54 individuals after correcting for possible losses (approximately 10%). The Stata version 13.1 was used for the estimates.
Procedures All patients recruited will be randomized to receive injections of Prosigne (Botulinum Toxin A) or a Placebo solution (sterile Sodium Chloride 0.9%). Each patient in the treatment group will receive 400 units of botulinum toxin. 100 units will be injected at adductors at each leg and 100 units will be applied in each triceps surae bilaterally. The botulinum toxin as well as the placebo solutions will be prepared by a blind investigator. Prosigne will be diluted with sterile sodium chloride (10U/0.2mL). Within 24 to 28 weeks of the first treatment groups will be switched. Those patients that received botulinum toxin will receive a placebo solution and vice-versa (crossover point). During the study, all patients will be oriented to maintain the ongoing use of medications. They will receive an explanatory sheet regarding stretching exercises, at least one month before receiving treatment, and will be trained by a physiotherapist to execute those exercises twice a week.
Data analysis and interpretation Patients will be evaluated by an experienced and blind neurologist regarding the efficacy parameters of the study. This evaluation will take place immediately before each treatment section and 8 weeks after it. The primary outcome measure will be maximum gait velocity. Each patient will be asked to walk a 10 meter distance barefooted 3 times, as fast as he can. The average velocity between the 3 trials will be used as the final measure. Assistive devices are permitted. Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS), Ashworth modified spasticity scale, medical research council scale for muscular strength (for adductors, thigh and triceps surae muscle groups), visual analogic scale of pain, brief pain inventory and the modified fatigue impact scale, together with the 10 meter comfortable walking velocity, will be evaluated at the same day as the primary outcome measure and will serve as secondary outcome measures.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Botulinum Toxin Injections | Experimental | Other: Botulinum Toxin InjectionsBotulinum Toxin injections at adductors and triceps surae |
| Placebo Injections | Placebo comparator | Other: Placebo InjectionsPlacebo injections at adductors and triceps surae |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age between 18 and 80 years
- Clinical diagnosis of Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia
- Ability to walk at least 10 meters: Assistive devices are permitted
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Wheelchair bound patients
- Additional neurological symptoms that may significantly impact gait such as ataxia, polyneuropathy or dementia.
- Fixed tendon contractures
- Antecedents of allergy or adverse reaction to botulinum toxin
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding condition
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Botulinum Toxin InjectionsEach patient in the treatment group will receive 400 units of botulinum toxin. 100 units will be injected at adductors at each leg and 100 units will be applied in each triceps surae bilaterally. | Other | Botulinum Toxin Injections |
| Placebo InjectionsEach patient in the placebo group will receive sterile sodium chloride injections at adductors and triceps surae muscles bilaterally. | Other | Placebo Injections |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline in 10 meter maximum gate velocity
Time frame: 8 weeks after injections
The primary outcome measure will be change from baseline in maximum gait velocity. Each patient will be asked to walk a 10 meter distance barefooted 3 times, as fast as he can. The average velocity between the 3 trials will be used as the final measure. Assistive devices are permitted.
7 secondary outcomes
Change from baseline in Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS),
Time frame: 8 weeks after each procedure
Change from baseline in Ashworth spasticity scale of adductors and triceps surae muscles
Time frame: 8 weeks after each procedure
Change from baseline in muscle strengh (Medical Research Council scale) concerning adductors and triceps surae muscles.
Time frame: 8 weeks after each procedure
Change from baseline in visual analogic scale of pain
Time frame: 8 weeks after each procedure
Change from baseline in brief pain inventory scale
Time frame: 8 weeks after each procedure
Change from baseline in modified fatigue impact scale
Time frame: 8 weeks after each procedure
Change from baseline in 10 meter comfortable walking velocity
Time frame: 8 weeks after each procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Nov 2017.
- Background: PubMed 25325386de Niet M, de Bot ST, van de Warrenburg BP, Weerdesteyn V, Geurts AC. Functional effects of botulinum toxin type-A treatment and subsequent stretching of spastic calf muscles: a study in patients with hereditary spastic paraplegia. J Rehabil Med. 2015 Feb;47(2):147-53. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1909.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Whole-body Electrical Muscle Stimulation Exercise on Adults With Neuromuscular Disease
Neuromuscular Diseases (NMD), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Active, not recruiting
Flexibility, Resistance, Aerobic, Movement Execution Training in Adults With Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia
Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Registry Database for Movement Disorders in Southern Anhui Province
Motor Neuron Diseases, Spinocerebellar Ataxias
RecruitingObservational study
TreatHSP Platform: Adaptive Natural History Platform for Ataxias, HSPs, and Spastic Ataxias
Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia, Spastic Ataxia
RecruitingObservational study
A Natural History Study Seeks to Understand the Clinical, Genomic, Pharmacological, Laboratory, and Dietary Determinates of Pyrimidine and Purine Metabolism Disorders
AMPD3, OMIM*102772, AMP Deaminase Deficiency, AK1, OMIM *103000, Adenylate Kinase Deficiency
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marcondes c França Júnior, M.D, PhD principal investigator
University of Campinas, Brazil
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Botulinum Toxin Injections in people with Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia, run by University of Campinas, Brazil at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline in 10 meter maximum gate velocity (time frame: 8 weeks after injections). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02604186, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2017.